Military Review

In South Korea, placed all six components of THAAD PRO

26
All six components of the American missile defense system THAAD deployed in South Korea, while Seoul did not give Moscow guarantees that this system will be controlled by South Korean military, said in an interview with RIA News Russian Ambassador to South Korea Alexander Timonin.


In South Korea, placed all six components of THAAD PRO


With regard to the deployment in the Republic of Korea (Republic of Korea) of the American ABMAD system, as far as we know, currently all six components of this anti-missile battery are already deployed in the Republic of Kazakhstan. At the same time, only the South Korean military men are not talking about any "guarantees" of control of these complexes.
- he said.

In July, 2016, after five months of negotiations, the United States and South Korea agreed to deploy the THAAD system, which would, if necessary, intercept North Korean ballistic missiles. THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) is designed for high-altitude over-atmospheric interception of missiles, allegedly, of short and medium range.

The deployment of THAAD is causing concern to China and Russia. Japan expressed its approval for these plans, noting that the deployment of THAAD would contribute to peace and stability in the region.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 26 January 2018 11: 50
    +4
    But the South and the North will go to the Olympic Games as one team. wassat Friendship is direct for centuries. laughing Soon, the tone of many leaders who are now tearing shirts will noticeably change to a more respectful one.
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 26 January 2018 11: 58
      +3
      The big strategic mistake of the leadership of the Republic of Korea, given the fact that these weapons will be commanded by mattresses, who do not care about the interests of Koreans.
      1. family tree
        family tree 26 January 2018 12: 09
        +1
        Quote: Thought Giant
        The big strategic mistake of the leadership of the Republic of Korea, given the fact

        And given the fact that they have now become one of the priority objectives for warheads, both for Chinese and Russian.
        Even, the closer the "lampad", the more dreary at heart recourse
        1. Vladimir16
          Vladimir16 26 January 2018 13: 08
          0
          Japan expressed appreciation for these plans, noting that the deployment of THAAD would contribute to peace and stability in the region.

          Masochists. If mattresses again explode atomic bombs in Japan, will the Japanese again express their approval?
          Should the Chinese or Russians retaliate with the canine THAAD and the whole of South Korea with it, the Koreans who survived by miracle would thank the mattresses with a retaliatory strike?
          Instead of head z.op they have?
          1. Shurik70
            Shurik70 26 January 2018 13: 16
            +1
            In fact, if you remember what happened before, it turns out funny.

            USA: Buy from us THAAD, you will shoot down rockets of northerners.
            South Korea: Give me a couple.
            people of South Korea: AAAAA !!! They will kill us all! Let's go to the protests!
            China: We do not like such air defense at the borders.
            USA: Here are four for you.
            South Korea: We asked for a couple!
            USA: You have one billion $
            South Korea: Cho ?? !! We generally requested a couple of hundred and fifty.
            USA: So 150 without taxes, we never write taxes on price tags in stores.
            South Korea: Take it all in the ass! We do not need THAAD, you need, you pay yourself.
            USA: Okay, then put six. You have half a billion.

            laughing
  2. mihey
    mihey 26 January 2018 11: 58
    0
    The softness of the response to the Merikatos Wishlist of our and Chinese rulers begins to strain more and more. Maybe it's time to go from chatter to business?
    1. sogdy
      sogdy 26 January 2018 12: 30
      +2
      Quote: mihey
      Maybe it's time to go from chatter to business?

      What is your action plan? What is the intended effect of your actions?
      1. mihey
        mihey 26 January 2018 12: 51
        0
        Put in Sev. Korea, our missile defense system with our service team. There are two axioms: 1) Gopniks understand only power; 2) it is impossible to negotiate with terrorists and blackmailers under any circumstances. Everything will not be worse early, but it can become better.
        1. sogdy
          sogdy 26 January 2018 13: 01
          +1
          Quote: mihey
          Put in Sev. Korea our missile defense systems with our service team

          From the territory of the DPRK, artillery shoots through the whole of RK. Without missile defense and other gadgets. In theory, one salvo (well, then five) could be enough to completely destroy, for example, Seoul. There is also rocket artillery.
          But, to all this there is some suspicion that Japan and Guam will be the most affected. From both sides.
          And yes, everything is so close there, the neighbor’s training ground and management in Magadan are enough. Closer than from Belarus to France.
          1. mihey
            mihey 26 January 2018 13: 05
            0
            Russian missile defense systems in the North. Korea should not be deployed in order to intercept missiles, but so that no one jerks at this state.
            1. sogdy
              sogdy 30 January 2018 15: 18
              0
              Misha, is the permanent presence of our railway workers in the DPRK not enough?
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 26 January 2018 11: 59
    +1
    worries China and Russia
    And moreover, it’s justified. Y. Korea is needed by Americans exclusively for the so-called "containment" of Russia and China.
    Japan commended these plans
    For Americans it’s not so easy.
  4. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 26 January 2018 12: 06
    0
    Silent glanders, at our side ... Now on the left on the globe, then on the right. Seriously, they think that we demons are demon.
    You sleep in the summer on the veranda, do not touch anyone at dawn, and then some evil Drosophila starts to get you. Well, I’m not too lazy, I’ll get up from the 15th with the Pravda newspaper in my hands ... And then I’ll go fishing. Thanks for waking me up. Amen. Something somehow thought so. drinks We’ll get you soon and through the South Pole, and there, like Portos, you’ll have a band behind your back - without beautiful pebbles, and catch without a chance.
  5. Baloo
    Baloo 26 January 2018 12: 07
    +1
    In the territory of South Korea, new targets were delivered.
  6. askort154
    askort154 26 January 2018 12: 10
    0
    Sometimes the idea, absurd at first glance, comes that “Y” is a deep development of the USA.
    Dude studied in Switzerland, it's hard to believe that he was not interested in the CIA. The Americans helped him create rockets (rather Ukrainian, because they did not respond to this message in the media) and gave several nuclear charges that he "experienced". To this noise, they placed their TNAAD against China and Russia. Korea will be reunited. As a result, there will be a new nuclear power in the Asia-Pacific region under the control of the United States.
    Korea will become "Israel" in the Asia-Pacific region! And what?
    1. family tree
      family tree 26 January 2018 12: 27
      +1
      Korea will become "Israel" in the Asia-Pacific region! And what?
      Not a ride, China is nearby. Yes, and the Donut power is unlikely to be shared. Rather, she still bargains the buns, both from the Chinese and from the opposite side. He studied in Switzerland laughing
  7. Guru
    Guru 26 January 2018 12: 26
    0
    Well, everything is clear. The Koreans will have no idea which missiles are loaded into containers, air defense or tactical. Clever what to say.
  8. Lavrenti Pavlovich
    Lavrenti Pavlovich 26 January 2018 12: 34
    0
    When stripes someone really warm up, so that would not seem a little.
    1. mihey
      mihey 26 January 2018 12: 54
      0
      Options 2, and both with a nuclear apocalypse at the end.
  9. Firework
    Firework 26 January 2018 13: 26
    +1
    it’s not scary, the Russian Federation has missiles not only in the Far East, but Sev. Korea is a rather unpredictable state
  10. Aleks2048
    Aleks2048 26 January 2018 13: 26
    0
    Like it or not, but the way out of this and generally the situation with the defense capability of the Russian Federation in asymmetric measures such as "status 6". You need to have based on fundamentally different non-missile methods for delivering guaranteed US death. It may spit on a nuclear-free space treaty or something else, but in any case, you need a club and in general it should be cheap. All the same, a nuclear strike weapon is the last argument, both for enemies and for friends and for ourselves. Today, there can be no limited nuclear conflict. Just as there can be no limited local war between the USA and the Russian Federation. Such local events will almost instantly become global.
    In all other respects, that is, for other conflicts, the presence or absence of this complex in the Republic of Kazakhstan does not play a role. And about the fact that he will be serviced by calculations from the United States and that the alleged problem is in subordinating the calculations of the complex in the United States, and not the Kyrgyz Republic, as it was clear right away, the whole army of the Kyrgyz Republic is subordinate to the US army leadership.
  11. Old26
    Old26 26 January 2018 21: 08
    0
    Quote: perepilka
    And given the fact that they have now become one of the priority objectives for warheads, both for Chinese and Russian.

    Well, with the Chinese, at least it’s clear, but where does the Russian warheads. It is for China that these installations at least pose a certain danger, but for the Russians they are there, that they are not

    Quote: sogdy
    From the territory of the DPRK, artillery shoots through the whole of RK. Without missile defense and other gadgets. .

    Well, do not write such a frank nonsense, showing your level of knowledge. Or in your reality, North Korean artillery has a firing range of 400 km ????

    Quote: sogdy
    In theory, one salvo (well, then five) could be enough to completely destroy, for example, Seoul. There is also rocket artillery ..

    Well, just the same GLOBAL THEORETICIAN, at least once, consider that one (or five) volleys are sufficient for the complete destruction of Seoul. I wonder if you know that the conglomeration of Seoul is approximately 90 to 75 km. To Seoul (the center of the capital) and not to the outskirts of the conglomeration - about 40 km. And the North Koreans have about 60 self-propelled guns of 170-mm caliber, with a TTX sufficient to cover the center of Seoul. True they shoot with a rate of fire 1-2 shots in 5 minutes
    There is also rocket artillery. About 4 thousand out of 10 thousand MLRS have a firing range of 10 km. From the demilitarized zone to the very outskirts of the Seoul conglomeration, about 20 km (this is a 5 km wide section. And how many artillery systems will you put in. There are, of course, a hundred or two caliber 240 mm. Where will you place it?

    Even if you consider that in one salvo, theoretically, North Koreans can launch 4000 shells in the Southerners, and the conglomeration area is 6750 square meters. kilometers, it turns out that 1 shell per 1,7 quad. kilometer. A good destruction when one shell falls over more than one and a half square kilometers.

    Quote: sogdy
    But, to all this there is some suspicion that Japan and Guam will be the most affected. From both sides ..

    Well, Japan is still close, and the North Koreans have something to get. But if it gets to Guam, then only a few missiles. If at the same time get

    Quote: Alex2048
    Like it or not, but the way out of this and generally the situation with the defense capability of the Russian Federation in asymmetric measures such as "status 6". .

    "Status-6" will not help here. Minimum "Status-15".

    Quote: Alex2048
    You need to have based on fundamentally different non-missile methods for delivering guaranteed US death. .

    What about similar developments in the US? What about the analogue of our "Status"? In contrast to the figure from the document with the stamp "Well, very secret. Burn before reading."shown on TV, the Americans have already shown their "toy" in the "iron"
    1. sogdy
      sogdy 27 January 2018 19: 43
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      Well, just the same GLOBAL THEORETIST, at least once think that one (or five) volleys are sufficient for the complete destruction of Seoul.

      Thanks for the criticism.
      True, your calculation is not clear on the numbers of 40 years ago, the existing line - existing - and being developed - 60 years. Further, do not explain where Korea has such reserves of iron, copper and tin from? And the mass production of nitrates is somehow not very clear. But there are endless reserves of expanded clay, selenium. But the DPRK's rocket technology is completely its own.
      Doesn’t it seem worth it to listen to the “fabrications” of Koreans? And yet, to assume that we are dealing with a different class of weapons?
  12. Old26
    Old26 27 January 2018 20: 53
    0
    Quote: sogdy
    True, your calculation is not clear on the numbers of 40 years ago, the existing line - existing - and being developed - 60 years.

    Do not quite understand your passage? and here 40 years ago and being developed 60 years. What, the demilitarized zone took a different shape? Has it become narrower or wider? This has not changed, and there is an extremely small section of the DMZ from the DPRK, where it is possible to place guns and MLRS so that at least part of it would reach Seoul.

    Quote: sogdy
    Further, do not explain where Korea has such reserves of iron, copper and tin from? And the mass production of nitrates is somehow not very clear. But there are endless reserves of expanded clay, selenium.

    Most likely these questions relate to someone else, I did not write about them

    Quote: sogdy
    But the DPRK's rocket technology is completely its own.

    The technology is possible (I emphasize only possible) and was developed in the DPRK, although on the basis of the achievements of the USSR, Ukraine, and Russia.

    Quote: sogdy
    Doesn’t it seem worth it to listen to the “fabrications” of Koreans? And yet, to assume that we are dealing with a different class of weapons?

    What are the fabrications? We must proceed from this
    1. sogdy
      sogdy 31 January 2018 14: 22
      0
      Quote: Old26
      Most likely these questions relate to someone else, I did not write about them

      These questions arise directly from your calculation, since the ammunition you expect must be produced.
      Quote: Old26
      What, the demilitarized zone took a different shape? Has it become narrower or wider? This has not changed, and there is an extremely small section of the DMZ from the DPRK, where it is possible to place guns and MLRS so that at least part of it would reach Seoul.

      Well right, not even funny.
      Quote: Old26
      The technology is possible (I emphasize only possible) and was developed in the DPRK, although on the basis of the achievements of the USSR, Ukraine, and Russia.

      Can you justify your doubts?
      About the "developments of the USSR, Ukraine, Russia" - is also not funny. Kibalchich did not draw a postal rocket. And he used the Korean-Chinese developments, and not bad aglitsky (s).
      All technology rests on the availability of nozzle and nozzle materials. The rest is dancing from this node. Management, type of fuel, size and shape are determined by a key element.
      I would not want to go further into the educational program further. The only question is: is Korea a suicide country with its 9-year written history? Didn't the Korean say that weapons should be reproducible here and now?
  13. Fkjydjckfrgh
    Fkjydjckfrgh 28 January 2018 12: 25
    0
    "Well, now the whole duck is ours." (with)
  14. The comment was deleted.