Military Review

Because of the advantages of NATO, war with Russia will be nuclear

96
A military conflict between NATO and the Russian Federation will lead to a nuclear war. The nuclear scenario is most likely when NATO has an advantage. In this world war, billions of people will die.


Because of the advantages of NATO, war with Russia will be nuclear


About the possible advantage of the North Atlantic alliance in the war and the offensive "Doomsday" writes in a popular magazine "National Interest" famous analyst Dave Majumdar.

Why does the war with Russia lead to a nuclear catastrophe that will kill billions of people? That was the question Dave Majumdar asked. And tried to answer it. In a written form.

A counter-attack by the NATO forces of the Russian forces would be a bloody response and would lead to the highest risk of an escalation of the conflict, the analyst believes. However, just such a scenario is “one of the likely results of the Russian invasion,” the specialist is confident.

In the case of a NATO counterattack, traditional Russian forces, “of which only a part are well trained and well equipped,” will suffer serious losses or will be completely destroyed, explains Majumdar. And if NATO forces then attack targets inside Russia, or even "move onto Russian territory," the Kremlin may conclude: there is a danger of "state existence." In the end, after all, Moscow has repeatedly “expressed concern” that Western plans for regime change in Russia are “too real a danger”. And in this situation, Majumdar points out, Russia can decide to oppose the advancement of NATO forces "with its arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons».

A recent study by the RAND Corporation showed that Russia could capture three NATO states within sixty hours: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Nor did the war games of the brain trust imitate the use of nuclear weapons. If a war breaks out between NATO and Russia, “nuclear weapons will certainly come into play, especially if the conflict develops in a bad direction for Moscow,” the analyst believes.

In contrast to the Soviet Union, which adhered to the policy of non-first use of nuclear weapons, modern Russia, the author recalls, "directly rejected" this provision - and this refusal happened back in 1993 year. The traditional military forces of Moscow were falling apart during the economic and social crisis of the 1990s, and Russia finally adopted the “de-escalation” doctrine. Here is the 2000 doctrine of the year in brief (in the vision of Majumdar): if Russia faced a large-scale attack, the result of which would be the defeat of its traditional forces, Moscow could resort to nuclear weapons.

In the 2010 year, the foreign author continues, Russia “revised this doctrine somewhat” as its usual forces began to recover. And in the current version of the doctrine it is stated that Moscow will use nuclear weapons in those situations “that would endanger the very existence of the state”.

The current RAND study shows that Russia could easily have seized the Baltic, but the war game did not consider the case when a NATO offensive would be launched. It speaks only of the quick defeat of the Baltic countries, as a result of which the North Atlantic Alliance would be in a bad situation and with a limited number of answer options. All the answers would be “bad”: a counteroffensive fraught with blood, losses and the risk of escalation of the conflict. The most peaceful option from NATO is a temporary “concession” to the Russians, that is, recognition of defeat. This has disastrous consequences - no, not for the Baltic countries, but for the alliance.

Meanwhile, according to Majumdar, it is precisely the NATO offensive, albeit bloody, that would become "one of the likely consequences of the Russian invasion." And in this case, the Russian traditional forces would most likely be destroyed. Or they would have suffered significant damage.

As for the Russian tactical nuclear arsenal, the analyst writes further, it is not as large as the Soviet arsenal was once. True, the exact data "difficult to find."

It was believed that the Soviet Union possessed from 15.000 to 25.000 units. tactical nuclear weapons of all types, up to medium-range ballistic missiles.

According to the US Congress, Moscow is gradually destroying its non-strategic arsenal. The reduction has been going on since the end of the Cold War. In today's Russia, however, there are up to 4.000 tactical nuclear units. However, other experts suggest that Russia has only 2.000 tactical units of nuclear weapons. But these data are hardly accurate. A relatively recent analysis by the Royal United Service Institute of Igor Sutyagin (Great Britain) showed that Russia has no more than 1.040 units. non-strategic nuclear weapons. Of these, from 128 to 210 warheads are in service with the Russian ground forces. In Russian navy there are about 330 tactical units of nuclear weapons, the Russian Air Force - 334 units The air defense forces of the Russian Federation have another 68 to 166 tactical nuclear weapons mounted on various ground-to-air missiles. Finally, according to a report presented by the Federation of American Scientists, Russia generally has no deployed non-strategic nuclear weapons. All tactical units are "in the central storage", and "several thousand decommissioned non-strategic warheads are awaiting dismantle."

On that "study" of experts and analyst Majumdar ends. The idea of ​​specialists is clear: Americans and NATO should not be so afraid of the Russian nuclear response and the "escalation" - the Russians may not have time to give a tactical nuclear response. They are all gathering dust in warehouses or outdated and waiting for disassembly.

On the other hand, analyst Majumdar hints at the “billions” of future victims of the new war. Obviously, behind these words lies the analyst's opinion about the possible use of Russian strategic nuclear weapons, and not tactical ones. It is logical: since the Russians are not ready to fight with tactical "units", strategic ones will be used. But what about: there is a danger to the "existence of the state."

The specialist sees salvation for the West in one thing: in the power of NATO. The alliance must certainly have “advantages” over the Russians. Apparently, this is the main message of the whole article. The more NATO has the military strength and technical advantages, the less chances Mr. Putin has for the occupation of the Baltic countries.

But why does the Kremlin need the Baltic countries? Not a single Western expert not only answers this question, but, in fact, does not even put it. The only answer that foreign analysts and politicians give is this: Putin wants to restore Russia's former greatness and extend the borders of the Fatherland to the former borders of the USSR. However, this is only a parody of the answer.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vard
    Vard 29 January 2018 15: 03
    0
    Well, this was when it was ... And now our military is being driven both in the tail and in the mane ... So everything is more likely the opposite ...
    1. Varyag_0711
      Varyag_0711 29 January 2018 16: 21
      35
      As soon as I read to the last name "analyst" Dave Majumdar, I got sick of reading further. And after this phrase:
      A counter-attack by the NATO forces of the Russian forces would be a bloody response and would lead to the highest risk of an escalation of the conflict, the analyst believes. However, just such a scenario is “one of the likely results of the Russian invasion,” the specialist is confident.
      I finally believed in the "prophetic gift" of this cherished "analyst".
      Russia is just asleep and sees how to start a nuclear war for the sake of these Tribal Baltic countries with low social responsibility. fool Well, what else can be said about the gift of foresight of Dave Majumdar? To say that such "analysts" were kept in special institutions in the USSR, this means to say nothing. With the same success, I can act as an international analyst, I even think that I will do much better.
      1. Berber
        Berber 29 January 2018 16: 46
        +7
        I did not even read further. Man lives in a parallel world. No analyst from him. The analysis is based on computer shooters.
        That the analysis will be better is sure.
        1. Antianglosax
          Antianglosax 30 January 2018 10: 22
          +2
          What is nuclear, what is not nuclear - there are no chances for the Westerners, and they know this better than ours, and therefore they break out like incapable dogs.
      2. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 29 January 2018 21: 53
        +4
        Quote: Varyag_0711
        Well, what else can be said about the gift of foresight of Dave Majumdar? To say that such "analysts" were kept in special institutions in the USSR, this means to say nothing. With the same success, I can act as an international analyst, I even think that I will do much better.
        I think that this, as you indicated, “AnalyteG” did not set such a task as to give the layman a real alignment and forecast of the development of military operations between NATO and Russia, as well as the result thereof. He has a different task, namely a methodical and constant impact on the Moscow Union of Artists of the American and European inhabitants, with the aim of accustoming him to the idea of ​​the inevitability of the impending war with Russia. No more...
        1. jjj
          jjj 30 January 2018 10: 32
          +1
          If all the events that develop around Russia are arranged in a logical chain, the conclusion is clear: the Western world is systematically preparing for war with Russia, cutting off the strings of ties. By the way, friends, it's time to get the cards of the "Mir" payment system
      3. karabas86
        karabas86 1 February 2018 22: 22
        0
        100500 hi good bully laughing 100500
    2. zyzx
      zyzx 29 January 2018 16: 34
      +3
      May there be no full-scale war. Modern weapons are so expensive that the same fighters, at a cost of 100 million greens, became like battleships, at the beginning of the 20th century, they all built them up, but it was scary to use them against an equal enemy, and suddenly they would be drowned. So the 5th generation aircraft are so expensive to send not a single general will dare them against the means of modern air defense.
      1. Looking for
        Looking for 5 February 2018 00: 03
        -1
        You have strange criteria for a full-scale war. The horse, too, throughout the history of mankind, has stood like a battleship. And nevertheless, the history of the earth is a continuous string of wars.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 29 January 2018 17: 29
      0
      If they elect Zhirinovsky as president, he will surely drop the “core” into some small state, as he promised. So, for wit. belay
      1. Pax tecum
        Pax tecum 29 January 2018 20: 04
        +3
        analyst Majumdar alludes to “billions” of future victims of a new war

        Well, not the "billions" really ... Enough to ditch just one "golden billion". And, this is roughly the NATO bastard.
        1. Victor Bukhtoyarov
          Victor Bukhtoyarov 31 January 2018 09: 36
          0
          ..I absolutely agree ... I pretend to be a performer I hope God forgives ...
          1. Looking for
            Looking for 5 February 2018 00: 05
            -1
            They will go to a holy cause — to free the world from the adversary.
  2. svp67
    svp67 29 January 2018 15: 05
    11
    Because of the advantages of NATO, war with Russia will be nuclear
    And someone thought that it would be like a knightly duel when knights rode out on the battlefield and staged a tournament? Russia simply has no choice but to use its nuclear forces in the event of such a conflict, and NATO countries have too many advantages for ALL INDICATORS. We simply cannot stop them otherwise. So, you should not be silent about this, but speak LOUD and OPEN. Whatever people in Europe would understand again, that this war would not go round them, they would get the full bill.
    1. Pax tecum
      Pax tecum 29 January 2018 20: 12
      +1
      In general, this "analyst" is right. We acquired and improved our nuclear weapons precisely then, so that the bloodiest war in the history of mankind would not be repeated.
      And, NATO is a creation just against the USSR / Russia, in other words, against the Russians. In Russian, one, two, three do not go, History weaned. But, and such a huge NATO crowd is also bored. This is the merit of our nuclear triad.
  3. Overlock
    Overlock 29 January 2018 15: 22
    +7
    Quote: svp67
    Russia simply has no choice but to use its nuclear forces in the event of such a conflict, and NATO countries have too many advantages for ALL INDICATORS.

    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 29 January 2018 15: 36
      12
      Laurel Sling cutter-Don't give rest?
      Be afraid ... to you before him, as before China laughing
      1. Overlock
        Overlock 29 January 2018 15: 53
        +5
        on the merits of the question there are objections?
        1. Varyag_0711
          Varyag_0711 29 January 2018 16: 23
          12
          Overlock Today, 15:53 ​​↑ New
          on the merits of the question there are objections?
          There is! Stop bearing bullshit and you will be happy.
          1. Overlock
            Overlock 29 January 2018 16: 38
            +3
            What is bullshit. specify
            1. Mestny
              Mestny 29 January 2018 16: 57
              +4
              For each article the same pipe.
              And it’s okay to quote there, so no. Some kind of cheap pictures of teenagers will pile up.
              Not ashamed?
              1. Overlock
                Overlock 29 January 2018 17: 06
                +4
                what are you talking about? The impossibility of a nuclear war with Europe or the children of our elite and their homes in the EU?
                And then heaped up? They run around with us, and there
                1. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 29 January 2018 18: 14
                  +5
                  What are the children and the elite on the nose of the nuclear conflict - whoever shoots first will die second, no matter who is where and where.
            2. Varyag_0711
              Varyag_0711 29 January 2018 17: 04
              +8
              Overlock Today, 16:38 PM ↑
              What is bullshit. specify
              In all, in ALL of your comments, the same duda, "lelikusopropalo" and "Putin all the time", change the record, otherwise it has already stuck.
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 29 January 2018 17: 11
                10
                Quote: Varyag_0711
                ... change the record, otherwise it’s already stuck

                Where does the sewing machine plate come from? laughing
                1. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 29 January 2018 18: 15
                  +4
                  The dude has a spool on the sewing machine.
              2. Overlock
                Overlock 29 January 2018 19: 08
                +2
                the exact opposite of yours, everything is fine, everything is wonderful, it will be even better. This is normal - when everyone thinks the same, brain cancer turns out
                1. your1970
                  your1970 29 January 2018 22: 21
                  +3
                  Quote: Overlock
                  the exact opposite of yours, everything is fine, everything is wonderful, it will be even better. This is normal - when everyone thinks the same, brain cancer turns out
                  -Do you seriously think that if information passes about the upcoming launch of nuclear weapons by NATO, someone will think about someone else’s children in Europe? Or do you not understand that even if we don’t use nuclear weapons at all (we won’t / don’t want / don’t we can) Europe will have enough of that radioactive infection - which will be ours?
                  A tiny ejection (actually not even an explosion !!) in Chernobyl was recorded to the border of France and Spain !! And now multiply by the power and number of NATO warheads - at least 2000-3000 times.
                  What nafig children there, what are you ..
                  We will not be here - but they also have there a Geiger counter will scale from the consequences of the explosions of their own warheads, and nuclear winter, and other delights. A week earlier, a week later ...
                  1. Golovan Jack
                    Golovan Jack 29 January 2018 22: 42
                    +6
                    With all due respect, you are currently feeding the troll.
                    About "children" - this is only one of the standard cliches with which they operate here, ahem.
                    Quote: your1970
                    ... nuclear winter, and other delights ...

                    Now come running Vadim237, and will explain to you how twice two, that nuclear winter is prejudice ...
                    Goss ... how boring something request
                  2. meandr51
                    meandr51 30 January 2018 13: 53
                    0
                    Hardly. A nuclear power plant has a thousandfold greater amount of radiation contamination (radionuclides) than nuclear bombs. so there will be no fatal consequences for Europe. And if so, Washington doesn't give a damn.
                    1. Vadim237
                      Vadim237 30 January 2018 22: 41
                      0
                      Dangerous consequences will be coupled with technological accidents, as well as from decay products such as Iodine 131 half-life of 8 days, Strontium 90 half-life of 28 years, Cesium 137 half-life of 30 years of Americas 241 half-life of 432 years, Carbon 14 half-life of 5700 years .
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. zulusuluz
      zulusuluz 29 January 2018 21: 54
      +1

      Overlock
      Do you think there will be Konashenkov’s children at hour X ???
  4. leonardo_1971
    leonardo_1971 29 January 2018 15: 27
    +2
    Why do they need such hysteria? War is not a blockbuster on the screen. But death, blood and the loss of everything that is close to you. After a nuclear war, nobody will need iPhones, bucks and much more. Let's live in peace!
  5. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 29 January 2018 15: 48
    +3
    I hesitate to ask, and why the hell Russia the Baltic countries then capture? Have farmers of Russia resisted without minerals?
    1. zyzx
      zyzx 29 January 2018 16: 37
      +3
      Well, you are strange, we are evil RICHINS! Every morning after drinking vodka and playing the balalaika, I begin to develop an invasion plan in different countries, then ride a bear and sharpen my automatic machine.
    2. tank66
      tank66 29 January 2018 18: 29
      +2
      And you, sir, have you not heard of the mega-reserves of sprat and balm?
    3. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 29 January 2018 22: 17
      +5
      Quote: andrej-shironov
      and why the heck Russia the Baltic countries then capture? Have farmers of Russia resisted without minerals?

      There is no reason, if the USA and NATO are not planning to shout at us with a new crusade ... If this happens, then the Tribalts are important in this game as a bridgehead of the invasion. Therefore, it will have to be de facto eliminated before the landing of the expeditionary forces at the ports of Shprotoedov ... Then the expedition will have to land in Poland, Germany, France - and this is a loss of pace, long logistics to the line of contact ... Not ICE!
      Therefore, knowing what awaits them, the NATO troops raised their whine in advance according to unrealizable dreams and irrevocably poorer ... m invasion plans. EU-nicknames themselves against the Russian Federation without backwater support for such a gamble will not dare ... And the staff will risk their health after applying BSU ... This is what we should be very seriously afraid of ... Deployment of the orbital missile defense system and the number of rocket-launch vehicles will become a litmus test -technology...
      Somehow, however.
      1. andrej-shironov
        andrej-shironov 30 January 2018 09: 28
        0
        Not logical. This can be done without seizing the bridgehead. Modern warfare trends often imply a contactless war with the enemy, which allows you to do without tactical devices of the Second World War. Accordingly, the bridgehead, as a buffer territory, is not needed by itself.
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 30 January 2018 23: 29
          +1
          Quote: andrej-shironov
          a bridgehead, as a buffer territory, is not needed on its own.

          You came up with this great !!!
          MAO from wheels, without a bridgehead ... Yes, this is a new word in operational art! Without the concentration of forces, without the deployment of the landing base, the rear - well, even the poisees would not have endured it, not like some kind of PDO forces there !!! belay
          Respect ... Respect !!! bully
          1. andrej-shironov
            andrej-shironov 31 January 2018 09: 01
            +1
            In vain foolishness, apparently nothing to say. If we are talking about the capture of the Tribaltics, then you don’t need a bridgehead, because at the borders. If we talk about the bridgehead as a springboard further to Europe, then this does not need the whole Tribaltic.
    4. meandr51
      meandr51 30 January 2018 13: 54
      0
      So shy on! Do not put the civilized in an uncomfortable position.
      1. meandr51
        meandr51 30 January 2018 14: 02
        0
        By the way, the Russian Federation can also capture Georgia, and capture Turkmenistan and Mongolia. How did they forget that?
      2. andrej-shironov
        andrej-shironov 30 January 2018 14: 41
        0
        Yes, you sir Hamlo! wink In fact, you have nothing to argue?
  6. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 29 January 2018 15: 49
    +2
    Each war is much tougher than the previous one. So the war that NATO will start against Russia will be the last. Even with any favorable outcome, the world will simply fall apart not in small groups of embittered, endangered populations.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 29 January 2018 18: 18
      0
      With a greater probability of 100% in case of danger, all NATO members will act on the principle - one for all and each for themselves.
      1. meandr51
        meandr51 30 January 2018 13: 55
        0
        The first option is not believed. Here, each for himself is real. This is in the event of a nuclear war.
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 29 January 2018 22: 37
      +1
      Quote: tihonmarine
      with any favorable outcome, the world will simply fall apart not in small groups of embittered, endangered populations.

      Well, so endangered. It is possible that someone is evolving. For example, insects. And they will drive people with slippers - an eye for an eye wassat
  7. BAI
    BAI 29 January 2018 16: 12
    0
    They have everything gathering dust in warehouses

    Well, let them think so. I have every reason to believe that an unpleasant "surprise" will await the NATO members.
  8. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 29 January 2018 16: 32
    +3
    It seems that such a report was written in the early 00s (zero). Many have already recognized the fact that the modern Russian army will cope with NATO provided that the United States does not intervene, and will cope with the use of conventional weapons and not nuclear weapons ..
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 30 January 2018 13: 57
      0
      Even in case of intervention. Americans don’t have time to throw anything right away. And then they just won’t give them. Yes, and why should they?
  9. X Y Z
    X Y Z 29 January 2018 16: 39
    +2
    Not guys, you drop it. Once invaded, then there is military action, devastation, famine. And Russian fools must feed all this horde of loafers, their industry, economy, etc. Here we have only a dream to capture these bankrupt wastelands. No, they themselves have collapsed, and feed yourself. There are no fools.
  10. Proton
    Proton 29 January 2018 17: 15
    0
    I think it’s time to start turning the videos with the explosions and consequences of nuclear explosions, as applied to Gorgods, modeling, they like to simulate everything in the west, so we will show how rusty and old it can come laughing
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 30 January 2018 13: 58
      0
      It is necessary to make films about the nuclear response of the Russian Federation and twist them in the West, if it is banned from showing, then on the Internet.
  11. Mustached Kok
    Mustached Kok 29 January 2018 17: 27
    0
    Most likely this is one of those representatives of the "experts" who say that the Pentagon asks them to beg for new money for the "budget", and not what actually happens
  12. urman
    urman 29 January 2018 17: 30
    0
    Counter attack of NATO forces.
    It turns out first the Russian Federation attacks.
    Damn, they are in the west, generally wizards, like that grandmother in the forest, Yu
    I will not rape you granny, as you will not have to.
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 30 January 2018 13: 59
      +1
      They attack themselves, and then CNN will say that we first started.
  13. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 29 January 2018 17: 33
    +2
    People take it easy laughing These reports are intended for the ears of their electorate according to the level of thinking of this very electorate. wassat
  14. kipage
    kipage 29 January 2018 18: 30
    15
    Because of the advantages of NATO, war with Russia will be nuclear

    Undoubtedly
  15. kudma
    kudma 29 January 2018 18: 34
    +1
    Damn I’ll go feed the bear, and then soon to capture the Baltic states!
  16. The Sparkle
    The Sparkle 29 January 2018 18: 54
    0
    I do not call for the seizure of the tribaltics, but I do not mind - if the inscription “made in Russia” was on Riga Balsam, as now on Crimean wines. But as far as I understand the “non-citizens” everything suits them there and the Crimean scenario will not work there. )))
    1. Mikhail Filippov
      Mikhail Filippov 30 January 2018 13: 45
      0
      And there are not so many of them
    2. KaPToC
      KaPToC 30 January 2018 17: 41
      0
      Quote: Flame
      I do not call for the seizure of the tribaltics, but I do not mind - if the inscription “made in Russia” was on Riga Balsam, as now on Crimean wines.

      It is only necessary to wait a bit, all Russophobes from the Baltic countries are leaving to live west, she (the Baltic States) will not go anywhere from Russia.
  17. vredlo
    vredlo 29 January 2018 19: 59
    +1
    damn I’ll go take a samovar with vodka from a bear and then I’ll get drunk again and when the Baltic states fight we’ll go to saddle him and he’ll grease a severe infection and balalaika to celebrate a victory
  18. bandabas
    bandabas 29 January 2018 20: 00
    0
    Directly DMB. But then. Wow ...
  19. Old26
    Old26 29 January 2018 20: 13
    +2
    Quote: andrej-shironov
    I hesitate to ask, and why the hell Russia the Baltic countries then capture? Have farmers of Russia resisted without minerals?

    The most appropriate question. What for? Yes, technically, according to the analysts of the same RAND, we can capture the Baltic states in less than 3 days, and NATO will not even have time to transfer a couple of battalions there. But the question is, why do we need this Baltic surrendered? If after the US withdrawal from the INF, they deploy their ballistic missiles there, then a blow rather than an invasion will be sufficient. Again, no wars begin spontaneously. There will be a certain period of preparation that opens.

    In short - the analytics of this Dave Majumdar is a huge minus,

    Quote: zyzx
    Well, you are strange, we are evil RICHINS! Every morning after drinking vodka and playing the balalaika, I begin to develop an invasion plan in different countries, then ride a bear and sharpen my automatic machine.

    Exactly. You ride a poor animal, but not to share a liter with it, and then you can use a balalaika duet, and plans to develop

    Quote: Alexey-74
    It seems that such a report was written in the early 00s (zero). Many have already recognized the fact that the modern Russian army will cope with NATO provided that the United States does not intervene, and will cope with the use of conventional weapons and not nuclear weapons ..

    Cope? Do our armed forces already surpass the NATO forces in quantitative and qualitative terms? We have more aviation than them. The fleet is also probably an order of magnitude larger? Maybe you shouldn’t be engaged in cap-making, but is it realistic to look at the world? We can really defeat NATO only with the use of nuclear weapons. Otherwise, they surpass us in all respects.
    1. Mikhail Filippov
      Mikhail Filippov 30 January 2018 13: 45
      0
      Baltic ... why the Baltic states surrendered to the USSR? Just don’t say that they supposedly “asked for it themselves”. Bulgaria, Angola, Mozambique also once asked, but they were not taken. They didn’t take Mongolia, but they took it - why?
      Why are they now? Well, for example, we need a way to the Kaliningrad region - this is at least.
  20. Max von adelheid
    Max von adelheid 29 January 2018 20: 55
    0
    Ahtung !!! Rusish PARTISAN !!! belay
  21. Vadim237
    Vadim237 29 January 2018 22: 09
    0
    Since they are thinking about nuclear war, it’s worth looking at one episode filmed in Ukraine in 2013 that’s not about war - but the details of what NATA does not think about are underlined.
  22. shinobi
    shinobi 29 January 2018 22: 45
    0
    Was this "analyst" in the army himself? Strategist damn. To attack, they need to create a shock fist. And this is a large number of everything, only in small areas. The target is shorter. That’s generally not necessary to use nuclear weapons. Enough and conventional MLRS. About which, incidentally, sane Pentagon generals constantly tryndy. They remember the Chinese lesson about Damansky better than the Chinese themselves. And there the advantage was almost 15-20 times. But Madzhmur apparently knows better how they are.
  23. Georgievic
    Georgievic 29 January 2018 22: 59
    0
    Delirium of a smoked Asian accidentally granted permission for permanent residence!
  24. Seraphimamur
    Seraphimamur 30 January 2018 06: 03
    +2
    I did not even read to the end. This is how much you need to be sick on your head in order to seriously think that between NATO (USA) and Russia a non-nuclear war is possible. If there is a war, then only a nuclear war for the complete destruction of either us or them. And unfortunately, unlike the USSR, Russia is not ready for such a war in terms of economy and civil defense.
    1. meandr51
      meandr51 30 January 2018 14: 03
      0
      I'm ready. I will stay alive and take over the USA!
    2. Vladimir Moroz
      Vladimir Moroz 31 January 2018 20: 28
      +1
      And the population of NATO is ready for war!
  25. Mikhail Filippov
    Mikhail Filippov 30 January 2018 13: 42
    +1
    Calm down, there will be nothing in terms of direct military confrontation. There will be a series of proxy wars such as Ukrainian, there will be economic pressure, informational. There will be a war of special services, there will be a demonstration of power ... but there will be no direct military clash
  26. alexjk
    alexjk 30 January 2018 13: 57
    0
    )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
    )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
    )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
    )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
    )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
    1. Murlyka cat
      Murlyka cat 30 January 2018 16: 06
      0
      Let's play our favorite children's game, a game with the words: Americans, Americans, Americans, Americans, poop. I suggest in the future, when writing articles, to use only an abbreviated version of the name of these schizophrenics.
  27. klm-57
    klm-57 30 January 2018 13: 58
    +1
    Again nonsense. Some kind of Russian invasion ... Who needs you to invade the ruined dwarf countries?
  28. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 30 January 2018 14: 13
    0
    The Western World for many centuries accumulated gold, jewelry and assets, destroying and robbing either Carthage, then Persia, then Byzantium, Napoleon and Hitler, I'm not talking about the rich India, Libya, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria ... And all that was looted beyond labor to lose in a nuclear war? Don’t get sick !!! The global financial clans of the Americans will never go to a nuclear conflict, if there is even a 0,01% probability of dying. Moreover, having large capitals, you can live under any government, even under Zyuganov with his "communist" oligarchs or Chinese communists. Global financiers will not bring the conflict to universal perdition.
  29. istepanov
    istepanov 30 January 2018 14: 20
    0
    Jewish warrior escalates. They really have no choice but to push idiots into their minds with their foreheads.

    But we have a way out!
    "Deep otvetka" for the deep state of America and the operation "Sky Sniper"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JANYfmq0EPI

    Introduced for Roskomnadzor Jews from 05min 30sec Kvachkov and beyond - BSK, but what a start !!!
    Qualified, with the entry into a new paradigm, overcoming the Old Testament usury is achieved exclusively in an inter-civilizational dialogue, with a transparently set and raising the worldview level of earthlings with the super-task of OVERCOMING THROUGH PRESCRIPTION.
    DISPRESSION - superiority, foresight of their unnatural essence, from the height of predictability, ability, ability to penetrate into the essence of something, anticipate low motives, intrigues and tricks, deactivate them by announcing them at an early stage.

    It is important that reaching the next stage in the development of mankind, conventionally called the cosmological paradigm, is metrologically reliable and cannot be bloody.
    Those. maximum transparency of the jammed "Jewish question" is a sufficient condition [sic!] acting on it like a summer sun on snow.
    WHEN THE LIGHT COMES, DARKNESS IS GOING ON - NO FIGHT!
    1. istepanov
      istepanov 30 January 2018 14: 23
      +1
      And no abstraction, no esotericism.
      LIGHT liberating the Russian Federation, and together with it humanity from usurious beliefs, is materialized by the usual prose of life))):

      1) With a slight movement of a strong (power) hand, the Roskomnadzor is cleared of Jews who are systemically wrecking there.

      2) Overcoming at the household level, the methods of Old Testament fraud, metrologically classified into three groups: Demagogy, Pilpulism and Khutspa. This is achieved by teaching them in schools at the OBZh lessons or electives, for maximum coverage in a short time period. Just a few training hours, with practicing in role-playing games, and an eco-social vaccination for life will give a systemically guaranteed result in line with the development of humanity (HDI).

      3) The indispensability and system superiority of the so-called A close examination of the “Jewish mind” in management and business turned out to be fraud - dumping any business process into the logic of a zero-sum game (to play with a non-zero sum, you need the good will of both parties, or the total superiority of the “forces of good”), and the following: gain ”, due to fraudulent schemes already launched at the ideological level, in cooperation with finances and themis.
      Significantly more effective in terms of noise immunity, managerial polystructures provide a sufficient quality for overcoming system fraud solutions.

      Nothing personal - the paradigm of the infant, trilogy - flat-earth stage of the development of civilization is outdated and has become its antagonist.
      - According to the Law of Time. The Law of Time - a multiple increase in the level of worldview literacy that occurs during the life of one generation, automatically debunkes the Old Testament matrix of total lies.
      - On the development of technologies for access to space energies and the systematic loss of the need for fraudulent loans, always accompanied by a loop of opaque exacerbations
      - Due to the fact that the Jews themselves have rolled into the arms of the golden calf.
      This is clearly demonstrated by Trump with Bannon and the MAGA, a verified high-tech approach, for the first time in the history of mankind, tearing to shreds the title mechanism of enslavement of states and peoples - a systemically fraudulent scheme for the election of a P-resident through liquid media.
  30. time112
    time112 30 January 2018 15: 07
    0
    Yeah ........ this "analyst" is more like paralysis. Arguments "... plus or minus a kilometer" regarding Russia's nuclear stockpiles. So can I. As they say - sculpt Emelya, your week)))
  31. wachmann
    wachmann 30 January 2018 16: 16
    0
    "And if the NATO forces then attack targets inside Russia or even" move to Russian territory ", the Kremlin can conclude: there is a danger to the" existence of the state. "
    guessed it yourself? what a seer! laughing
  32. Bind
    Bind 30 January 2018 17: 03
    0
    In the furnace of their research :))
    Russia enough for 10 hours to capture troebaltov. Only they in FIG did not fall to anyone
  33. Old26
    Old26 30 January 2018 18: 24
    0
    Quote: Binding
    Russia enough for 10 hours to capture troebaltov. Only they in FIG did not fall to anyone

    For some reason, our general staff assured that 60 is enough. Maybe it will not “overfulfill” the plan and capture “ahead of schedule”?
    1. Town Hall
      Town Hall 30 January 2018 18: 28
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      For some reason, our General Staff assured that 60 is enough.




      And one well-known Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation assured that he had 24 hours and a battalion of airborne forces to capture one provincial Russian city
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 30 January 2018 20: 30
        0
        As a result, they all raked - but he stayed away.
  34. aleks700
    aleks700 31 January 2018 04: 41
    0
    But why does the Kremlin need the Baltic countries?
    That is the question! A piece of course tidbit, but the first ?! Never.
  35. sgapich
    sgapich 31 January 2018 06: 38
    0
    Here, in fact, this "expert", I suspect that in this case - "sofa analyteG level 80" smile
  36. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 31 January 2018 08: 17
    0
    Here is a specific message for US, CREEPED out of fear, when such articles come out it says only one thing - they don’t know what to do, they’re screaming different nonsense, Europe and its territory, chemical plants, platinum, nuclear power plants will have enough and 100 nuclear blanks, which counter-offensive, when huge territories are flooded from its use, the question is how will the concentration of troops be carried out for an offensive with such a floating territory. Not to mention other aspects of wars. professionals will justify it much better. This scribbler MUDAKMMURISTY lost his brains from excitement, I am afraid, as if, as that Minister of State Defense had not kicked from any window, their psyche is weak. Mood ... he is in Africa Mood ....
  37. IgorS
    IgorS 31 January 2018 11: 58
    +1
    A striking example of a Western school of analysts:
    “The Martians will take over Boston in two days.” We have three possible answers ...
    “Do Martians even exist?” And do they need Boston?
    “You are a traitor!” Exist! And, of course, dream of aggression! We will repulse the attack so ...
  38. Vladimir Moroz
    Vladimir Moroz 31 January 2018 20: 23
    +1
    Who told this person that he is an analyst? This is a typical DB according to the classification of S. Lavrov. What is the invasion of the Russians? Where? What for?
  39. JonnyT
    JonnyT 1 February 2018 11: 43
    0
    Majumdar


    Another fantastic vyser from the patient.
    The probability of using nuclear weapons by NATO for offensive purposes is much higher than Russia's defense against the "invincible and brilliant super military superman of NATO soldiers"
  40. Alexey Mazurov
    Alexey Mazurov 1 February 2018 13: 57
    0
    And without sprotland, Russia can’t see the power ... a good attempt to give us beggars, the Pentagon, thank you, no need ... feed yourself!
  41. bsk_una
    bsk_una 1 February 2018 18: 42
    0
    Poor renowned analyst Dave Majumdar! Why is he still alive, and did not jump out of the window at least from the 5th floor (most likely the outcome will be predictable). But to think, why do Russians need Balts !? They need to be fed, to develop an economy that they sucked after the 90s. Tell me frankly, Mr. Dave, your fists itch, so you often visit fascist Ukraine, come to Klichno, ask well to correct your reckless little head. Maybe help!
  42. Looking for
    Looking for 4 February 2018 23: 54
    -1
    It’s ridiculous to read the rants of this American expert. The main thing is not to say that in the event of a possible nuclear conflict. Almost all of Russia's nuclear weapons potential will be aimed not at some Baltic states or even at Europe. . And given the population density of some regions of the United States- "each neutron-proton will find its purpose"
  43. Nikita azyava
    Nikita azyava 19 December 2019 00: 00
    0
    we are Russian ready for a nuclear war with NATO