Military Review

National Interest told what the conflict between NATO and Russia can turn into

74
The armed conflict between the NATO and Russian forces could lead to a nuclear war, and the likelihood of such a scenario is especially high if the advantage is on the side of the alliance, writes National Interest magazine.




“The USSR’s nuclear strategy was based on a“ non-first-use ”policy, meaning the state’s refusal to use nuclear weapons, except when the country itself is subjected to nuclear aggression. However, modern Russia abandoned this policy and developed a new military doctrine in 2000, which implies the possibility of using a nuclear arsenal in case of a threat of defeat or the threat of defeat of the Russian general-purpose forces, ”the article cites. RIA News.

The doctrine of the 2010 year, in turn, involves the use of nuclear weapons in situations that "endanger the existence of the state as such," the newspaper notes.

The author emphasizes that a possible “Russian aggression” against the Baltic states will lead to a counter-offensive from the NATO forces.

At the same time, experts believe that "the Russian conventional armed forces will be defeated due to the fact that only a small part of them are well prepared and equipped," and "in the event of a NATO attack on military facilities inside Russia or the penetration of the North Atlantic Alliance into Russian territory of Moscow will use tactical nuclear weapons to counter the offensive forces of the military-political bloc, "the article says.

At the same time, military experts believe that “Russia has a much smaller arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons compared to the Soviet Union,” the author writes.

According to various estimates, today the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have "from one to four thousand units of non-strategic nuclear weapons." And some experts claim that “Russia today has no tactical nuclear weapons ready for use,” concludes the publication.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 26 January 2018 08: 37
    25
    National Interest told what the conflict between NATO and Russia can turn into

    Than what ... the Russian northern fox will come to the homes of Europeans and mattresses.
    The author emphasizes that a possible “Russian aggression” against the Baltic states will lead to a counter-offensive from the NATO forces.

    Yeah ... straight Kutuzov and Napoleon in one bottle. wassat Who will give them that? Iskanders by that time would make Europe a glass desert and out of NATO forces in those lands, except that microbes would remain.
    1. oldseaman1957
      oldseaman1957 26 January 2018 08: 41
      +8
      Quote: NEXUS
      Russian northern fox will come to the homes of Europeans and mattresses
      - It will be so ... that God forbid! Forcing the situation to unacceptable limits, the West shows only one thing: mental degradation. This is scary!
      Iskanders will make Europe a glass desert by then
      - War, even victorious, without victims from the victors does not happen! They also grieve over the one who died, and there will be thousands of them! So do not stomp your foot.
      1. Pax tecum
        Pax tecum 26 January 2018 08: 44
        +5
        In principle, everything is true. A small clarification - Russian nuclear mushrooms will be enough for the whole world, and there will be no peace there.
        1. Pax tecum
          Pax tecum 26 January 2018 08: 49
          +5
          And why is it not so objective? Where is the likelihood of such a scenario where Russia defeats NATO during the conventional war with conventional weapons? Why not?
          About this does not write the magazine National Interest. Fearfully.
          PS There is a problem. We’ll take over Europe, but will we be able to keep this “unconventional flock”? Why do we need so much genetic trash?
          Although, if you think about it and give the go-ahead, you will cleanse yourself.
          Precedents were already in history. The latter is the creation of national liberation fronts in World War II. Even in the countries of Hitler's original allies.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 26 January 2018 09: 02
            +4
            Quote: Pax tecum
            And why is it not so objective? Where is the likelihood of such a scenario where Russia defeats NATO

            In this auto-training for European rambo, objectivity is not included. Stupidly zombies idiots, with a strong suggestion that they are immortal.
            1. bulvas
              bulvas 26 January 2018 09: 50
              +1
              Always surprised by such reasoning.
              Are they ready for at least one non-nuclear strike on their city?

              Or overseas are not interested in European cities?

              No, I think they are interested.
              They would be happy to restore European cities
              And the money would be allocated from the budget.

              That is the stakeholder in the conflict.

              The Middle East is no longer interested in them - everyone scooped up, it’s time to tackle Europe
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 26 January 2018 09: 54
                +3
                Quote: bulvas
                Or overseas are not interested in European cities?

                Of course they’re not interested ... it’s there, far, behind a puddle ... bombs never fell on American heads.
        2. neri73-r
          neri73-r 26 January 2018 08: 51
          0
          At the same time, military experts believe that “Russia has a much smaller arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons compared to the Soviet Union,” the author writes.


          And where did he go then? Remained in Ukraine? wassat
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 26 January 2018 08: 47
        16
        Quote: oldseaman1957
        The West shows only one thing: mental degradation.

        Mattresses stupidly believe that they will be able to sit behind a puddle. Putin clearly said that "we know where the legs grow from, and in case of aggression, we will beat not by hand, but immediately by the face ... by the impudent mattress’ face. "
        1. Star
          Star 26 January 2018 09: 29
          +2
          It is necessary to put warheads of the megaton class so that the impudent "erysipelas" would not even think that it can sit deep inside.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 26 January 2018 09: 31
            +2
            Quote: Asterisk
            It is necessary to put warheads of the megaton class so that the impudent "erysipelas" would not even think that it can sit deep inside.

            Here the topic of Status-6 really does not even let mattresses sleep peacefully. Maybe he can, or maybe not, but I’m sure they’re checking, they’re not eager.
      3. 210ox
        210ox 26 January 2018 08: 58
        +3
        In the near future, I hope this does not happen can show that the Caribbean crisis is nonsense ...
        Quote: oldseaman1957
        Quote: NEXUS
        Russian northern fox will come to the homes of Europeans and mattresses
        - It will be so ... that God forbid! Forcing the situation to unacceptable limits, the West shows only one thing: mental degradation. This is scary!
        Iskanders will make Europe a glass desert by then
        - War, even victorious, without victims from the victors does not happen! They also grieve over the one who died, and there will be thousands of them! So do not stomp your foot.
      4. Esoteric
        Esoteric 26 January 2018 10: 26
        +2
        Quote: oldseaman1957
        So do not stomp your foot.

        No, we will meet with bread and salt. Sometimes it is useful to burn weeds along the fence so that they do not penetrate and destroy crops with useful plants. No one is touching Europe, is not trying to conquer. Not only was she given the opportunity to contemplate a united Germany and a number of countries that were not even on the map of the XNUMXth century went to the dissolution of the SVD bloc, the withdrawal of troops in exchange for not expanding NATO eastward, so they are accustomed to a "freebie" So, have you decided to milk Russia before the end of time? Wanted free hot dogs? We feed until indigestion, they are called "Iskander" and "Caliber" ...
        soldier
      5. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 26 January 2018 10: 41
        +2
        "..if the advantage is on the side of the alliance, writes National Interest magazine." ""
        NATO advantage? What advantage does the National Interest talk about if:
        1. Russia is not going to invade and start a war with NATO. She does not need it.
        Maybe the Baltics are dreaming, "Well. Rather, take me?"
        And the US needs a reason to create an enemy for Europe in the person of Russia to keep the countries of NATO and the EU in its American reins
        And the bridle is the occupational waxes of the United States and Britain in Europe. Remained since 1945
        And the bridle is the purchase of American weapons by European countries and the maintenance of the US military-industrial complex and thereby the rise of their American economy at the expense of Europeans
        This is not the first time that National Interest has written about a variant of the RF Armed Forces invasion into the Baltic countries.
        For example .. Russia may seize Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania within 60 hours, reports The National Interest

        9 09 17 g ..https: //russian.rt.com/inotv/2017-09-09/Nationa
        l-interest-rasskazal-v-kakom

        2. Maybe once again the National Interest pushes the Europeans "nah Osten" and "blitzkrieg." ,, and they themselves are hoping to sit behind a large Atlantic puddle now. Speaking about the use of TACTICAL NW by Russia ... "Moreover, if NATO forces attack the territory of Russia, Moscow can conclude that the existence of the state is in jeopardy. In such circumstances, Russia may use its arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons.
        But. Tactical nuclear weapons in Europe are American and under American command .. And this is an occasion to strike at the territory of the United States itself
        In their madness, the specialists of RAND and National Interest began to play too.
    2. Vard
      Vard 26 January 2018 08: 43
      +1
      As for the defeat in a conventional war ... they dreamed about it ... A simple comparison of for example front-line aviation ... ours in Syria and NATO in Libya ... Or tanks ... in the same Syria and let's say in Iraq ... gives an unambiguous the answer ... They will again receive at the place where normal people have a face ...
      1. Pax tecum
        Pax tecum 26 January 2018 09: 16
        +2
        If a global “kneading” begins, and the world sees that Russia will annihilate NATO, then believe me, many will join. And this is in addition to our original allies.
        Russia will not be alone, although the entire collective West is afraid only of Russia. There, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics will be remembered, since such a topic has gone.
        Americans will be beaten and killed around the world by their military bases.
        And, until their continental territory (namely, the territory of the United States) is touched, it is not a fact that they will support EuroNATO. This will be a surprise!
        1. Esoteric
          Esoteric 26 January 2018 10: 32
          +1
          Quote: Pax tecum
          Americans will be beaten and killed around the world by their military bases.

          It's right yes DPRK's firm stance has already shown what these warriors actually represent. Their extermination in Syria is covered by the capital and real estate of Russian oligarchs. If Russia “cleansed” Syrian land, then Europe would shut up. They are on the cards - "brave warriors".
    3. Evil543
      Evil543 26 January 2018 08: 48
      +4
      And all that they know about us.
      “At the same time, experts believe that“ the Russian conventional armed forces will be defeated due to the fact that only a small part of them are well trained and equipped ”
      Here they contradict themselves, but what about the previous statements by experts and their generals that we are the best? Then we’ll tear them like a hot-water bottle, and now we’ll lose what

      [quote = NEXUS] [quote] National Interest told what the conflict between NATO and Russia might turn out [/ quote]

      Than what ... the Russian northern fox will come to the homes of Europeans and mattresses.

      What kind of fox? Hopefully Northern?
      1. Smog
        Smog 26 January 2018 09: 09
        +4
        . Most likely, "experts" National Interest paraphrenic syndrome.
        Paraphrenic syndrome is characterized by delusions of persecution, exposure, phenomena of mental automatism, combined with fantastic delusions of greatness. Patients say that they are great people, gods, leaders, the course of the world history of the Critic depends on them, consciousness of the disease in such patients is completely absent. Paraphrenic delusional syndrome is most often observed with schizophrenia, less often with late psychoses.
      2. Alexander 3
        Alexander 3 26 January 2018 09: 56
        0
        They have a squirrel jumping there, and they have many squirrels there.
        1. To be or not to be
          To be or not to be 26 January 2018 11: 03
          0
          "Squirrel is jumping," "
          Even as jumping !!
          At the annual NATO exercises in Europe such as "Steadfast Noon" ("Confident noon") worked out a whole range of issues related to the use of tactical nuclear bombs B61.
          The crews of Polish F-16 aircraft in addition to the aircraft of the USA, Belgium, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands began to be involved as early as 2010 at exercises of this type in Italy.
          Since last year, the crews of Czech aircraft have also been involved.
          In 2016, these exercises were held at air bases in Belgium and the Netherlands
          In 2017, the Kleine Brogel airbase in Belgium and the Buchel airbase in Germany

          And movies - Kleine Brogel, 17-10-2017, Steadfast Noon 2017, Polish F-16
      3. Esoteric
        Esoteric 26 January 2018 10: 37
        0
        Quote: Evil543
        Than than ... stop russian northern fox will come in the houses of Europeans and mattresses.
        What kind of fox? Hopefully Northern? fool

        Which one? Yes, no ... lol Here is one:
    4. gringo
      gringo 26 January 2018 11: 13
      0
      And the cockroaches will stay too
  2. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 26 January 2018 08: 41
    +3
    But what about the tactical: Immediately to the strategic. Why lose time? You can also connect the Martians.
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 26 January 2018 08: 55
      +5
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      But what about the tactical: Immediately to the strategic. Why lose time? You can also connect the Martians.

      There is contact with Martians, strategic asteroids are ready. Let them just try angry
      1. Mar.Tirah
        Mar.Tirah 26 January 2018 11: 16
        +1
        Tremble foes! good good good
  3. ramzes1776
    ramzes1776 26 January 2018 08: 44
    +4
    Do not worry Basurman, there are enough vigorous charges for everyone.
  4. AVA77
    AVA77 26 January 2018 08: 45
    +1
    Based on the publications in the Western press, I get the impression that they are all stupid people there. By Lavrov, db wassat
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 26 January 2018 09: 12
      +8
      Quote: AVA77
      Based on the publications in the Western press, I get the impression that they are all stupid people there. By Lavrov, db wassat

      They inspire European warriors that they have a "SAVE" button, and if that, you can reboot and fight further.
      1. AVA77
        AVA77 26 January 2018 09: 14
        +2
        Well, something like this fool , db
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 26 January 2018 09: 27
        +1
        If only they were not told that all of our missiles were "rotten" !!!
        1. Cobalt
          Cobalt 26 January 2018 09: 43
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          If only they were not told that all of our missiles were "rotten" !!!

          So they inspire! And there are few charges, and the army is weak .... and "Nata" - a counteroffensive on Russian territory ... and athletes on doping ... and in general they are invaders (Crimea) ... and support the bloody tyrants (Syria). So someone will get the impression that you can fight.
      3. Tusv
        Tusv 26 January 2018 09: 35
        +2
        Quote: NEXUS
        They inspire European warriors that they have a "SAVE" button, and if that, you can reboot and fight further.

        So disks will be formatted at the best. Though press f2 or on modern Cotrol S
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 26 January 2018 10: 13
          +2
          But sho, once the soldiers of the Red Army were inspired, the Shaw the German worker will not shoot his "brother" the Soviet worker, but will turn his weapon against his fat belly !!! What kind of blood for this d ... washed !!!
          Nothing new. carbon copy techniques, propaganda tools have simply become more extensive, that’s the whole difference !!!
          1. Cobalt
            Cobalt 26 January 2018 10: 46
            +2
            Quote: rocket757
            Well once inspired the soldiers of the Red Army

            So now they inspire it not to us, but to their public ....
            And they inspire us that we will throw all the hats.
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 26 January 2018 12: 41
              0
              Worse! Our hats are very NUCLEAR !!! However, they also have such identities!
  5. Bare
    Bare 26 January 2018 08: 47
    +1
    Let yourself think.
    laughing
  6. brr1
    brr1 26 January 2018 08: 50
    +4
    Nuclear weapons of operational-tactical level should be used immediately as at least one boot or adversary’s caterpillar crosses the country's border. The execution of enemies should be indicative.
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 26 January 2018 09: 00
      +1
      What about provocations? So immediately and the core? belay
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 26 January 2018 09: 14
        +7
        Quote: siberalt
        What about provocations? So immediately and the core? belay

        Have you tried to provoke a bear? He won’t understand your games - will you provoke it, or just dodrc. It will stupidly break it without waiting for pertonit.
    2. Tusv
      Tusv 26 January 2018 09: 49
      0
      Quote: brr1
      The execution of enemies should be indicative.

      Eh. Do not carefully read our doctrine. Already today it is possible to launch a couple of dozen warheads on it - to whom God will send
  7. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 26 January 2018 08: 52
    +4
    "..aggression of Russia against the Baltic states will lead to a counteroffensive by NATO forces ..". Yah ? In a single system. And why did they rush through the bushes when the Erdogan SU-24 shot down? With the thought: "just not me!" . They have a common ass on paper, in fact, each has its own. Yes, this historical misunderstanding of the Baltic states with their pleas for rape has not come against us. She recalls one famous ballerina in the past. She, too, is constantly looking for a pocket that she needs to stick to urgently.
    1. Pax tecum
      Pax tecum 26 January 2018 09: 03
      +2
      Yes, they all write specifically laughing This is their HP.
      As soon as Russia begins a counterattack, the mass surrender of NATO troops will begin and offer us their capitulation and the territory of the countries with a signature on pre-prepared documents.
      They massively learn Russian there.
      Well, do not hold a referendum, in fact. laughing
      Now what to do with them after that? what
      1. g1washntwn
        g1washntwn 26 January 2018 09: 44
        +1
        Quote: Pax tecum
        Now what to do with them after that?

        To learn a new homeland to love. :)
  8. XII Legion
    XII Legion 26 January 2018 09: 00
    15
    Has a place to be
  9. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 26 January 2018 09: 01
    0
    However, modern Russia abandoned this policy and developed a new military doctrine in 2000, which implies the possibility of using a nuclear arsenal in the event of a threat of defeat or a threat of defeat of the Russian armed forces of general purpose, ”

    Well, right. For nefig!
  10. Cxnumx
    Cxnumx 26 January 2018 09: 05
    0
    And some experts even argue that "Russia today does not have tactical nuclear weapons ready for use"

    the main thing is that such de.iloids are not listened too carefully, otherwise there will be a new extinction.
  11. Kent0001
    Kent0001 26 January 2018 09: 09
    +3
    I don’t understand one thing, why analysts from the West believe that we will attack the Baltic Limitrophs? They themselves all cease to exist a little later? What is their mantra about the Baltic states? Nobody needs them.
    And why do we use only tactical nuclear weapons, we are still strategic longing for the main irritant, if that.
  12. Simon
    Simon 26 January 2018 09: 11
    +6
    At the same time, military experts believe that "Russia has a significantly smaller arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons in comparison with the Soviet Union." --- They are very “smart” experts. Well, if they attack, then they will definitely find out how many tactical nuclear weapons we have. They apparently do not remember that after the collapse of the Union, all nuclear weapons were transported to Russia from the separated republics. tongue
  13. Brave Schweik-2
    Brave Schweik-2 26 January 2018 09: 17
    0
    We will boldly go into battle for the power of the Soviets! And as one we die in the struggle for it! ..
  14. Simon
    Simon 26 January 2018 09: 17
    +1
    Quote: neri73-r
    At the same time, military experts believe that “Russia has a much smaller arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons compared to the Soviet Union,” the author writes.


    And where did he go then? Remained in Ukraine? wassat

    Not ... e, sent to Russia. Now Bandera regrets wink
  15. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 26 January 2018 09: 19
    +3
    "Aggression of Russia" against the Baltic states will lead to a counterattack by NATO forces.
    Do they really assume that Russia needs these so-called Baltic states and because of them it will get involved in the war? Stupidity and stuffed up on edge. It is one thing when the politicians of these states try to talk about the "Russian threat" for their purely mercantile purposes, and another when the "enlightened" West picks it up and presents it as a real possible fact.
    or penetration of forces of the North Atlantic Alliance into Russian territory
    Can they? It seems to me that when the author of this journal wrote this nonsense, he himself laughed out loud.
    1. thinker
      thinker 26 January 2018 14: 19
      0
      Yes, look at the source, the author - Dave Majumdar, a famous "analyst."
  16. Maz
    Maz 26 January 2018 09: 38
    0
    And what is ahead of us? Who has the election? ETOGES not just hysteria pumped or what?
  17. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 26 January 2018 09: 38
    +2
    The logic of these rainbow-colored ones is based on the fact that Russia wants to conquer Europe, well, just can't live without it. Therefore, as they say, we definitely need nuclear weapons in sufficient quantities. Our vision of the situation is that the European territories, as well as its population, didn’t give up to us. In this case, why are they chasing NATO members with tactical nuclear weapons, when it is possible to "disinfect" Europe from the NATO infection by ICBMs. They let NATO bases with nuclear weapons come to them, which means they voluntarily stood up for potential distribution.
  18. anjey
    anjey 26 January 2018 09: 47
    0
    Moscow will use tactical nuclear weapons to counter the offensive by the forces of the military-political bloc
    what really trifles-beat the adversary with all together, strategic weapons and on its territory ....
  19. flicker
    flicker 26 January 2018 09: 50
    +3
    ... possible "Russian aggression" against the Baltic states will lead to a counteroffensive by NATO forces.

    Well, it’s just touching. First, LGBT propaganda, and then a “counteroffensive” laughing NATO soldiers are not so much soldiers as hunters (kill-yes, die-no) - and during the "counter-offensive" they will have to try on the psychology of game. Yes, from the one word "counteroffensive", they seem to begin to heal with pride and weaken from fear)
  20. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 26 January 2018 09: 57
    +3
    I never cease to be surprised at the hypocrite of Western journalists and politicians -
    The armed conflict between the NATO and Russian forces could lead to a nuclear war, and the likelihood of such a scenario is especially high if the advantage is on the side of the alliance, writes National Interest magazine.


    You might just think that if the advantage is on the side of Russia, then the USA and the EU will never use nuclear weapons ?! Yes, these bastards against the unfortunate Vietnam and its citizens used the chemical weapons of mass destruction - the agent "Orange", and now they are shouting about world peace and the threat from Russia ...

    These nerds will play out when the United States realizes that they can arrange a provocation with impunity to start a war against Russia, they will do it, whether this war will bring them something good in the form of Russian land production, I doubt very much, but there will be a lot of blood ...

    Now in the West they believe everything the United States is lying about, just as an example, if tomorrow an American submarine strikes its territory and blames Russia for everything, then no one will doubt it in the West ...

    The world is on the verge of a new war ...
  21. Aleks2048
    Aleks2048 26 January 2018 10: 02
    +1
    Something apparently does not work with analysts at NI. Considering Europe as a theater of operations in the conduct of non-nuclear war, for some reason they are trying to isolate it completely to the size of a sandbox. Why not a word is said about the Far East there if something is across the US to Alaska. :) But this is all the little things compared to the situation in the Middle East, there is European blood of war, there are suppliers of hydrocarbons that are needed for Europe and its equipment. I think that it is really necessary to consider the war on the continent of Eurasia, and not just in Europe.
  22. Altona
    Altona 26 January 2018 10: 05
    +1
    Quote: bulvas
    Always surprised by such reasoning.
    Are they ready for at least one non-nuclear strike on their city?

    Or overseas are not interested in European cities?

    ----------------------------------
    They may not be ready, but the allies during the war years dusted German cities with a train-round-robin raid method that even ordinary high-explosive bombs brought the nuclear effect when a permanent fire was created that could not be put out because the fire brigades and bridges were the first to bomb and hospitals, that is, rescue services. And then at the same time the houses on the outskirts and in the center collapsed, wild panic created, and the destruction was completed by the complete demolition of the city.
  23. Piramidon
    Piramidon 26 January 2018 10: 44
    +1
    The author emphasizes that a possible “Russian aggression” against the Baltic states will lead to a counter-offensive from the NATO forces.

    For starters, one of these “authors” would reasonably explain why Russia needs these Baltic states.
  24. taiga2018
    taiga2018 26 January 2018 10: 53
    +2
    here there are those whom history does not teach anything ...
  25. prior
    prior 26 January 2018 11: 10
    +1
    "National Interest told ...."
    Scribes need to write something. Chatterboxes need to chat.
    So they write, here they’re talking nonsense ... that it’s branding or wandering around.
  26. nikolaev
    nikolaev 26 January 2018 12: 24
    0
    Not "NATO Conflict with Russia", but
    "the conflict provoked by the USA against Russia" - it is necessary to speak correctly, and not to translate arrows with crafty terminology
  27. Northern warrior
    Northern warrior 26 January 2018 13: 20
    0
    Russia should withdraw from all treaties signed since 1985. We must tear apart the entire security system in Europe, so that every day they perceive it as the last in their lives. First, withdrawal from the START-3, INF, NPT, nuclear test ban treaties, the inviolability of borders in Europe treaty (1975), and then the resumption of Pu-239 production, the launch of programs to create new types of chemical and biological weapons. In short, a complete return to the beginning of the 80s in terms of the level of international tension.
  28. Tatanka Yotanka
    Tatanka Yotanka 26 January 2018 13: 48
    0
    non-nuclear war - probably hidden unrealizable dreams of a sensible European population who are fed up with gender and migrant policies to immediately give up))
  29. Multicast
    Multicast 26 January 2018 14: 28
    0
    And the article hurt everyone on the site))) Calm guys - naturally, if the conflict starts, and it can only begin with the help of Ukraine and if it comes to nuclear weapons, I would immediately bomb New York and Washington with California, and before everything this would quickly cut the line of communication from America to Europe. Now it is necessary to quietly and peacefully strengthen our forces and to quickly deploy arsenal of supersonic cruise missiles, there are few iskander - it is necessary that each army should be able to destroy enemy groups or headquarters in 5 to 500 minutes for 2500 - XNUMX thousand kilometers. Then no one dares to turn up to us.
  30. Multicast
    Multicast 26 January 2018 14: 31
    0
    Quote: Northern warrior
    Russia should withdraw from all treaties signed since 1985. We must tear apart the entire security system in Europe, so that every day they perceive it as the last in their lives. First, withdrawal from the START-3, INF, NPT, nuclear test ban treaties, the inviolability of borders in Europe treaty (1975), and then the resumption of Pu-239 production, the launch of programs to create new types of chemical and biological weapons. In short, a complete return to the beginning of the 80s in terms of the level of international tension.


    It’s you getting excited, you need to quietly, calmly bend your line and systematically show the enemy what to do if you even think about an attack or provocation.
  31. 1536
    1536 26 January 2018 19: 11
    0
    Why do we attack the Baltic states? We have enough recreational zones, reserves and reserves inside.
  32. Doubting
    Doubting 26 January 2018 21: 18
    0
    They, compare the Russian Federation and NATO laughing
    Pug and elephant. The Turks shot down the plane, the Americans bombed the base with tomahawks,
    than we answered with tomatoes?
  33. Sofa expert
    Sofa expert 27 January 2018 02: 59
    0


    Than what ... the Russian northern fox will come to the homes of Europeans and mattresses.

    What kind of fox? Hopefully Northern?

    Yes, you are the captain of evidence =)
  34. Cobra77
    Cobra77 27 January 2018 04: 40
    0
    Quote: Kent0001
    I don’t understand one thing, why analysts from the West believe that we will attack the Baltic Limitrophs? They themselves all cease to exist a little later? What is their mantra about the Baltic states? Nobody needs them.
    And why do we use only tactical nuclear weapons, we are still strategic longing for the main irritant, if that.


    They do not consider, but persuade. And the Balts because they are the least sorry. And they are the most stupid.
    Strategic no one will touch. Everyone knows the consequences. But tactical it can be both sides.
  35. Cobra77
    Cobra77 27 January 2018 04: 42
    0
    Quote: Doubting
    They, compare the Russian Federation and NATO laughing
    Pug and elephant. The Turks shot down the plane, the Americans bombed the base with tomahawks,
    than we answered with tomatoes?


    There is still something to answer. The trouble is not with this. The trouble with political will in the Russian Federation.
    1. myobius59
      myobius59 29 January 2018 11: 30
      0
      Here, exactly, you said correctly. Our kings, are you stupid or something, according to your "partners" and other "colleagues" all kinds of "Iskanders" and other crap to run !?. Yes, they would rather reduce their people to the status of a corpse than decide on it.
      And then the majority gathered such naive, just laughs. Although, rather sad.