Military Review

Davos Forum-2018 - another step in the slave system 2.0

49
The World Economic Forum (WEF) will be held in Davos 23-26 in January, the theme of which will be the search for causes and effective measures to resolve political and socio-economic problems of the world. Searches for "causes" and "exits" were somehow conducted at previous events, but this time US President Donald Trump should help. They didn’t wait for him at the last congress, because then he participated in the election race, he had to keep the face of the anti-globalist.


In addition, WEF-2018 is a conditional “anniversary” forum after the 2008 crisis. 10 years ago, measures were developed, the results of which can be assessed now.

And the results are disappointing, from the regular report of the Oxfam organization, it follows that 1% of the population of the Earth owns 82% of all world wealth. And over the past 10 years, the state of the super rich only increased, while for all the others it remained, as before, and decreased.

That is, the crisis was resolved not at the expense of a more equitable distribution of resources, but at the expense of the lower strata of the planet’s population.



A delegation of several officials will go to Davos from Russia: Minister of Energy Alexander Novak, Minister of Economic Development Maxim Oreshkin, Minister of Communications and Mass Communications Nikolai Nikiforov, Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich. Along with them will be some oligarchs: Oleg Deripaska, Vagit Alekperov, Mikhail Prokhorov, and others. However, they are unlikely to look for the causes of social and economic problems, because the VEF doesn’t set such a task. About this On the eve.RU told Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor MGIMO Valentin Katasonov.

Davos Forum-2018 - another step in the slave system 2.0


Question: After the leaders of the United States, Germany and some other states did not come to the WEF-2017, they began to talk more and more about the fact that the forum is losing its significance. Can this be said about meeting in 2018?

Valentin Katasonov: I have been preparing publications on the topic of Davos for several years, and I notice a tendency for him to really become just a “talker”. And not even representative talkative, because not all leaders come to this meeting. Last year, the main figure was the head of China, who said that if Trump and America abandon globalization, then the PRC is ready to lead this process itself.

Of course, there are a lot of interesting statements there, I even remember, Deripaska repeatedly made interesting statements in Davos, for example, harsh criticisms of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation were heard from his lips. Of course, I will follow this event, but I don’t expect anything special. I think that this is just a platform for some kind of exchange of opinions, a “get-together”, and there they do not take any important decisions.

Question: Is this “get-together” more likely even for business than for heads of state?

Valentin Katasonov: Yes, the ratio of representatives of approximately 50 / 50 is half the business, half of the officials or some informal representatives of the countries. And the Russian Federation has recently been represented by persons of a rather low level. I remember Medvedev went to Davos, and Putin was never there, well, and now Dvorkovich is there - in general, it’s rather a face for a tick. And they did not make any statements there.

Davos is, of course, a dying playground. And, of course, they will not be able to take any decisions there. A serious crisis for the whole world was the financial crisis. And in 2009-2010. on the same Davos there were quite serious recommendations, the same G8, G20 - decisions were made there. And we see that in a few years the world is again in the same situation, which is very similar to 2007-2008. And I do not exclude that this year there may be a second wave of financial crisis.

Question: That is, in the "anniversary" of the 2008 crisis, can we say that no conclusions have been made?

Valentin Katasonov: None, absolutely. This shows that indeed humanity, the “powerful of this world,” is somehow unable to control the process. And Davos in this sense is not an exception, but rather a vivid manifestation of the fact that the elites are unable to stop this process of slipping the world into the abyss.



Question: Why do you think that the second half of the financial crisis may begin this year?

Valentin Katasonov: I look at one indicator - the relative level of debt. It exceeded the 300% bar of GDP in the United States, the EU, and China. Especially in China, because taking into account the shadow market, even 650% of GDP is obtained there. But no specific decisions are made. Moreover, Trump almost achieved the complete abolition of the Dodd-Frank Act (this is the law that was passed under Obama and which was also called the law on reforming the banking system in the United States). This is almost a full binge for bankers, speculators. Well, the most important event that was awaited in 2017 - the second wave of the crisis - was not, but it means that it moves to 2018.

Question: How would you rate the Russian delegation this year?

Valentin Katasonov: The same level was in previous years, I do not see any special changes. The maximum that was from Russia is Dmitry Medvedev. At the presidential level, there has never been a representative office from the Russian Federation. By the way, Ulyukaev also visited as Minister of Economic Development. In general, I do not think this is some kind of "super level".

Question: If the site turns into a “talker” for business, it would be logical to reduce the number of participating ministers?

Valentin Katasonov: Yes, I agree, because there’s no sense from this "party". The only reason to go there is to simply understand where the wind is blowing, roughly speaking, “go exploring.” But for this it is not necessary to send ministers, it seems to me. It would be enough to send even lower-level officials, because no decisions will be made there anyway, no agreements will be signed either.

Question: And what about "no money"? Is there money for Davos?

Valentin Katasonov: Yes, and participation in this event is not cheap. It is clear that if the oligarchs are going, then this is their own business, and if officials are going, then I think there will be a counter in the number of millions of dollars. Oreshkin celebrated the new year as it was - and that was a resonance, and here, I think, we will have to spend more money.

Question: At the same time, Oxfam released a report, on the basis of which 1% of the population of the Earth now owns 82% of all wealth. How does this compare with Davos?

Valentin Katasonov: Oxfam is an organization that gives its estimates every year, and the trend is the same - this is yet another proof that the crisis will surely occur, because, as the classic Marxism said, the contradictions between production and purchasing demand are intensifying. That is, the more the number of absolutely and relatively poor people increases, the more opportunities there are for the onset of an economic crisis.



Question: What to prepare for?

Valentin Katasonov: Of course, there is a hard screening among the rich, only the super-rich remain. And not just the rich, but those who have determined that their goal is not wealth, but world power. All the rest are rich means for them. In this sense, our entire Russian bourgeoisie, the oligarchy, is also a means. Unfortunately, this does not reach them at all, and they expect that someone will leave them in this very elite. No, they are for real money owners nothing more than a means to achieve their goals.

It is important here that in fact capitalism has already ended. As George Soros said, the music stopped, and they are still dancing. This is no longer capitalism, this is post-capitalism. And post-capitalism is already a new slave system, this is such a gigantic concentration camp, and we see dozens and hundreds of signs of how this concentration camp is being built. In fact, the banking system ceases to exist in its previous form, because interest rates have gone into a minus. There will be no cash, because now there is a phenomenon not widely publicized by the media - "flight" from banks. World lenders and their lobbyists are doing everything possible and impossible to prohibit cash circulation. It will be a completely different model of society. But it will not be a literal return to that slave system, which was, say, thousands of years ago. It will be a much more brutal system, because the classic slave-owning society is a society based on slavery, and the slave is the private property of the owner. And today, of the so-called three growth factors — capital, natural resources, and labor (people) — two are scarce, and the third is redundant. And it can be seen with the naked eye that this excess is already virtually eliminated.

By the way, in 2016, the main theme in Davos was the so-called fourth technological revolution - its manifestation was the mass appearance of robots. So robots will “eat” people. This is post-capitalism, a completely different model of society, and almost no one talks about it.

We are going to, as one hero used to say Ray Bradbury’s novel “451 degrees Fahrenheit”, that a person is a napkin, in which they blow their nose and throw them away, take another napkin. Unfortunately, people do not “see the trees behind the trees,” and this is largely due to the fact that the media are switching our attention to some minor things.
Author:
Originator:
https://www.nakanune.ru/articles/113642/
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 26 January 2018 05: 57 New
    +6
    Fear caught up. But that's it!
    1. dSK
      dSK 26 January 2018 07: 38 New
      +5
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      everything goes
      to "Golden Horde 2,0 ". Valentin Yurievich Katasonov is 100% right. hi
      1. vladimirZ
        vladimirZ 26 January 2018 08: 00 New
        16
        The power of the capitalists inevitably leads to the enslavement of all mankind - and this is confirmed by the figures when "1% of the world's population owns 82% of all the world's wealth" - the slave system 2.0.
        Salvation is only in the new social social system, when the main resources will belong not to the rich, but to the people, in the SOCIALIST SOCIETY and the STATE.
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 26 January 2018 08: 17 New
          +1
          Quote: vladimirZ
          in SOCIALIST SOCIETY and the STATE.

          Old theories cannot offer anything new to society. Unfortunately, there are no new "left" ideas.
          1. vladimirZ
            vladimirZ 26 January 2018 08: 25 New
            +6
            Old theories cannot offer anything new to society. Unfortunately, there are no new "left" ideas. - Chertt

            What are the old ones? The scientific theory of the socio-political structure of states, the system, created by many generations of learned politicians and economists, summarized by K. Marx, and further developed by scientists and politicians. A great contribution to it was made by V.I. Lenin, creator of the world's first socialist state.
            Now this theory is being developed and socialist China is successfully living on this theory.
            What other "theory" do you need, Chertt? lol
            1. Chertt
              Chertt 26 January 2018 08: 47 New
              +8
              I want to make a reservation right away, so that there is an understanding. I am a convinced "Leftist", and an even worse-read leftist, But one cannot help but see that The scientific theory of the socio-political structure of states This is a theory that has big differences with practice. For example, in the USSR, one of the fundamental problems, personal stimulation and encouragement of citizens, was not resolved. All directions moving society forward were held by enthusiasts, which can hardly be considered "scientific" ... And for God's sake do not mention China. There is only a red banner from socialism
              1. vladimirZ
                vladimirZ 26 January 2018 09: 21 New
                +7
                For example, in the USSR, one of the fundamental problems, personal stimulation and encouragement of citizens, was not resolved. - Chertt

                And you know, for example, in the time of I.V. Stalin in the USSR was a "personal stimulation-encouragement" of citizens.
                There was a whole industry, the so-called private cooperation, which in various industrial and production cooperatives, by individual private entrepreneurs, produced a significant part of the so-called "consumer goods", household services.
                The state at that time concentrated its efforts on the development of big industry, energy, and private traders made goods for the people. By the way, the first mass television in the USSR was produced in one of the cooperatives in Leningrad. During the war, these private organizations carried out military orders. After the war, thanks in large part to this broad cooperative movement, the country's trading network was quickly saturated with various products. This system even had its own social pension provision.
                Unfortunately, in the post-Stalin period, Khrushchev liquidated the cooperative movement, pouring them into the Ministry of Local Industry, after which the country constantly faced a shortage of one or the other product.
                You can read about this in articles that have previously been published at VO.
                So that under socialism it is possible to create material interest of people, including those who want to engage in private cooperation.
                And by the way, in China, despite the fact that you do not agree with this, the socialist system, which sets the goal of a general increase in the well-being of the people.
                1. Chertt
                  Chertt 26 January 2018 09: 32 New
                  +1
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  And you know, for example, in the time of I.V. Stalin in the USSR was a "personal incentive-encouragement" of citizens

                  Yes, I know, just like that. that this does not fit into the "theory" of Marx. Therefore, it was destroyed. (You yourself gave an example that a pure theory is not always reasonable)
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  in China, the socialist system, which sets the goal of increasing the general well-being of the people.

                  All countries declare well-being of the people But the gap between billionaires and the poor in China is one of the largest in the world.
                  1. vladimirZ
                    vladimirZ 26 January 2018 09: 43 New
                    +2
                    just like that. that this does not fit into the "theory" of Marx. - Chertt

                    Then I will replenish your knowledge with the fact that Marxism is not a frozen, dead doctrine, science, it will constantly change over time and will be enriched with the knowledge and experience of subsequent generations.
                    For example, if in former times it was believed that communist society can be achieved quickly by passing socialism, there was even such an eccentric Khrushchev who set the goal of achieving communism by the 80 of the 20th century, but now they understand that this is a very slow process, requiring not only the achievement of material well-being society, but above all the moral degeneration of man, which cannot be achieved quickly.
                    It will take hundreds, if not thousands, of years of socialism, which gradually educates people in the morality of communism.
                    1. Chertt
                      Chertt 26 January 2018 09: 49 New
                      +3
                      Quote: vladimirZ
                      Then I will replenish your knowledge with the fact that Marxism is not a frozen, dead doctrine, science, it will constantly change over time and will be enriched with the knowledge and experience of subsequent generations.

                      Voooot. And now take a look at my first comment, This is what I tried to say. No development of old dogma
                      Quote: vladimirZ
                      the goal of achieving communism by the year 80 of the 20th century, they now understand that this is a very slow process, requiring not only the achievement of the material condition of society, but above all the moral degeneration of man,

                      All these general phrases should be worked out on the basis of scientific materialism. hi And such works, something is not visible
                  2. basmach
                    basmach 27 January 2018 03: 30 New
                    0
                    Actually, Marx did not create the theory of socialism. His "Capital" is a study of capitalism. Well, if you are well-read, then you should know. About socialism there is only a transition condition (and even then in passing) - the maximum socialization of production.
                2. CONTROL
                  CONTROL 26 January 2018 12: 22 New
                  +3
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  in the time of I.V. Stalin in the USSR was a "personal incentive-encouragement" of citizens ..

                  "The economic problems of socialism in the USSR" is a short work by I.V. Stalin, outlining the course that China is now taking. (there is a conspiracy theological opinion ...? ... what exactly because of this work of Stalin "died")
                  1. Pax tecum
                    Pax tecum 26 January 2018 16: 13 New
                    +2
                    Oh how! Some unhealthy movement began in relation to (the candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) P. Grudinin.
                    It seems that EdRo will use the administrative resource insolently, taking advantage of the situation and the “supervisors” will remain blind and deaf. And, here and now they really sensed the danger.
                    The CEC issued a warning to the Communist Party in connection with the distribution of the Pravda newsletter, RIA Novosti reports. The document was recognized as illegal campaigning for the candidate for president of Russia, nominated by the Communist Party, Pavel Grudinin.
                    Last Friday, in Novosibirsk, police detained a circulation of the newsletter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation “Pravda”. The document was dedicated to the Communist Party candidate for president of Russia, Grudinin. The local election commission considered the ballot to be illegal campaigning and prohibited its distribution.
                    It is alleged that most residents of the Russian Federation found out about the Communist Party presidential candidate Pavel Grudinin from opinion polls. And what will happen if more competent agitation goes?

                    Pamfilova (head of the CEC) -..., like Churov -..., in due time, earns on the order.
              2. Mikhail3
                Mikhail3 26 January 2018 10: 21 New
                +2
                Quote: Chertt
                personal incentive-encouraging citizens

                This very idea finished off socialism in our execution. In my opinion, the point was that the socialist idea, at first glance, is of great convenience for people, let’s say, a small mind.
                A simple, mechanistic set, do it and "the teaching is omnipotent, because it is true," that is, you will be taken out. So you, considering that everything is right, just think that it was necessary to adjust the "trough" ...
                Alas. In fact, socialism and communism is, in the last turn, “material incentive”. If our houses were to be shown to Marx now, to voice the working conditions to him, he would no doubt have declared his communism to have come true long ago! Materially, we have already greatly skipped his most daring ideas ...
                The question is completely different. The man himself had to change. That was the main task. But right then ... we must abandon the passions. Someone else’s aunt, a couple of rubles in excess of pay, fashionable eyeglasses with a layba ... after all, real little things, nothing to talk about! And the giant dreadnought of socialism crashed about them.
                The question is not about stimulation per se. And in what qualities of a person to rely on. How, for example, did conscience participate in socialist construction? She had people. They talked about her. But they tried not to have business ... And so with all the other qualities that should be the basis of communism.
                Eh, the topic is great, you have to write an article ...
                1. Chertt
                  Chertt 26 January 2018 10: 35 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Mikhail3
                  Eh, the topic is great, you have to write an article ...

                  You are absolutely right that the new social formations will be not so much new in terms of material incentives, but new according to the principle of relations in society.
                  Quote: Mikhail3
                  In fact, socialism and communism is, in the last turn, “material incentive”. If our houses were to be shown to Marx now, to voice the working conditions to him, he would no doubt have declared his communism to have come true long ago!

                  And in this direction, the development of the idea is not completely
                  1. Mikhail3
                    Mikhail3 26 January 2018 11: 37 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Chertt
                    And in this direction, the development of the idea is not completely

                    Exactly. And without this, there will be no progress in social relations on the hair. At the moment, we are "developing" as animals. Just follow the animal instincts. Our approach to power in society at the level of a rat flock.
                    But civilization has already passed the level of rats! To support the very existence of such a large and complex organism, an approach based on science is already necessary! Alas.
                    Century and centuries, the question of power was decided by the rat - the one who was meaner and gathered more strength for this took the upper hand. Climbing up, such a "leader" was engaged in strengthening his power and nothing more. Well, or not involved, and he was devoured. It worked.
                    And it worked because people used to be almost self-sufficient. Everyone survived, using mainly their own means, skills. So no matter how delusional miracles the authorities performed, this almost did not affect people's survival. Does the Sultan jump from bunk to bunk in the harem all year and do not show up from there? Dekhan continue to hoe. Revealed taxes viziers? So what? Etc.
                    And now for the survival of people it is necessary to coordinate the most complex models of relationships. Monstrously complex and interdependent processes of technoeconomics. Consider so many parameters when making decisions that supercomputers have stones spinning!
                    And the level of rulers? These guys, as a rule, do not know how to change the password. They are not up to it. They have a rat fight and nibble tails ...
                    1. Chertt
                      Chertt 26 January 2018 11: 59 New
                      0
                      Quote: Mikhail3
                      And now for the survival of people it is necessary to coordinate the most complex models of relationships. Monstrously complex and interdependent processes of technoeconomics

                      This is probably why the article is called "one more step in the slave system" That is, a society where it is consciously and where instinctively seeks to change the situation when a person finally becomes a set of zeros and ones on a plastic card
                2. CONTROL
                  CONTROL 26 January 2018 12: 31 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Mikhail3
                  Quote: Chertt
                  personal incentive-encouraging citizens

                  This very idea finished off socialism in our execution.

                  “Socialism in our performance” is Khrushchev’s socialism, the socialism of the leftist-Trotskyist.
                  ... And Marx screwed up with the theory of surplus value! He played into the hands of the very "world capital" - mainly financial, bankers - against whom he was trying to fight with his "Capital"; and this, for example, I understood in the 10th grade of middle school (well, not very "middle school" - but, as it were, more "special school" ...) schools!
                3. gladcu2
                  gladcu2 27 January 2018 04: 55 New
                  0
                  Mikhail3

                  You posed the question correctly.

                  Stimulus, realization of power, type of person under communism. So what is communism?

                  Each person working in a collective works in the communist system of labor organization.

                  Here the turner is going to get cutters in the warehouse. Does he pay money for the cutter? No. This means that relationships within an enterprise do not include a monetary system.
                  This turner receives a minimum living wage for survival. His incentive is only unemployment.

                  It turns out that the enterprise is communism, but outside capitalism. And the turner's salary is his social protection.

                  The owner of the enterprise, is a competition for survival.

                  Two ways to exercise power within an enterprise.

                  Command. When the worker is given a command, say, to roll a square or orders, when the worker is explained the situation and ASKED to complete the task, EXPLAINING the need to complete the task. In the second case, the worker is trusted. And the worker is imbued with doeriem. In the second case, the exercise of power takes place on trust. And the goal of the movement is the survival of the enterprise in the competition.

                  Now, the quality of a person in the second case is a sufficient level of system education so that the given conditions of trust can be realized.

                  But as they say, trust but verify. Therefore, an administrative factor must be present.

                  Now we expand the level of the enterprise in the size of the country and get communism. The most effective economic system with the implementation of the knowledge of every citizen of a country that has a goal, which is motivation.

                  Again. Communism is power based on trust, systemic education, and movement toward the ideal, as motivation in the complete absence of a monetary system.

                  The monetary system leads to the realization of power through the illusion of enrichment, and this undermines trust. Illusion she is such an illusion.

                  I hope that the concept of communism is clear ...
                  1. Mikhail3
                    Mikhail3 27 January 2018 16: 14 New
                    +1
                    Quote: gladcu2
                    When the worker is given a command, say, to roll a square or orders, when the worker is explained the situation and ASKED to complete the task, EXPLAINING the need to complete the task. In the second case, the worker is trusted. And the worker is imbued with confidence. In the second case, the exercise of power takes place on trust.

                    ABOUT! They understand me! A minute of sincere pleasure) Thank you. Well, the level that you should have started to go to - the worker goes to the factory library, and he himself understands which tool is needed ...
                    1. Okolotochny
                      Okolotochny 30 January 2018 12: 56 New
                      +4
                      Do you believe that yourself? This is unfortunately utopia. T.Moor, Campanella. People remain people, with all their vices and shortcomings.
                      1. Mikhail3
                        Mikhail3 30 January 2018 16: 04 New
                        0
                        How many stars do you have on a toy pursuit? Hehe ... This is how the most advanced combat unit in the world is controlled - the reconnaissance group. When any member of it, regardless of rank and rank, gives a command, for example: "lie down!" - all fulfill it. And any soldier also performs. If a general from the GRU is nearby, he will also plop down on his belly and try to take cover.
                        Because the fulfillment of the combat mission depends on this, and most importantly, because the whole group has sufficient training and is focused on the result. Whoever saw the danger is the main one at the moment! It is he who makes the decision, and the rest fulfill it. It works.
                        And about Mora ... read my posts first. READ them this time, and do not glance at the lines.
              3. CONTROL
                CONTROL 26 January 2018 12: 14 New
                +4
                Quote: Chertt
                I want to make a reservation right away, so that there is an understanding. I’m a convinced “Leftist,” and an even worse-read leftist,

                Well, "Leftist" ... this is an exaggeration! By what you write, it’s more like Pravak! although this definition is relatively ... In the framework of the parable:
                The atheist came to the theologian and says: - I am a convinced atheist! I am convinced that there is no God!
                Theologian: - And who convinced you of this? What evidence can you give of the "non-existence" of God? What works on this subject have you read?
                “Why do I need to?” Well, I know that there is no God! Atheist I ...
                - Yes, you, my friend, are not an atheist ... You are an ignoramus!
                1. Chertt
                  Chertt 26 January 2018 12: 31 New
                  +2
                  Quote: CONTROL
                  - Yes, you, my friend, are not an atheist ... You are an ignoramus!

                  Most likely not ignorant. but just not a smart person. A true atheist. the last to go is to argue with the theologian. And the right, left, really mixed up and lost their original meaning
          2. uskrabut
            uskrabut 26 January 2018 11: 03 New
            +3
            Quote: Chertt
            Old theories cannot offer anything new to society. Unfortunately, there are no new "left" ideas.

            M.S. Gorbachev proposed a new "concept", as a result of the collapse of the USSR and the degradation of the breakaway republics. It is better to cling to a proven Maxist model doped by Lenin and polished by Stalin. And rabble like Khrushchev and Gorbachev, with their illiteracy, ruined the well-functioning socialist mechanism.
            1. Chertt
              Chertt 26 January 2018 11: 14 New
              0
              Quote: uskrabut
              It’s better to cling on to the proven Maxist model doped by Lenin

              That is, you propose to discard all experience after the 50s of the 20th century and return to the 1923 model. ?? You are so divorced from reality that I have a question, you are by no means a civil servant
              1. CT-55_11-9009
                CT-55_11-9009 29 January 2018 09: 41 New
                +1
                Quote: Chertt
                That is, you propose to discard all experience after the 50s of the 20th century and return to the 1923 model. ?? You are so divorced from reality that I have a question, you are by no means a civil servant

                It is precisely from the experience of the whole 20th century that it turns out that the model of the "Stalinist economy" is the most effective. And this is not the 23rd year, but rather the mid-30s - early 50s (before Khrushchev). Even taking into account the largest war of mankind, which took place in the most developed regions of the Soviet Union, it DEVELOPED! Now - it’s good if it is held at the same level. I would like to believe that it is simply being reconstructed to a new technological structure, only something is not believed ... From the word at all.
      2. The black
        The black 26 January 2018 10: 18 New
        +2
        Davos Forum 2018
        - An ordinary party of oligakhs and mini-oligarchs, no more. The sense is ZERO.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 26 January 2018 08: 18 New
      +2
      For this private gangway with the participation of our officials at the expense of the state. the budget. belay
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 January 2018 22: 48 New
      0
      Robotization of production is an inevitable phenomenon.
  2. Same lech
    Same lech 26 January 2018 05: 57 New
    +6
    That is, the crisis was resolved not at the expense of a more equitable distribution of resources, but at the expense of the lower strata of the planet’s population.


    In ... I was wondering where all the billions of savings accumulated by ordinary citizens during the so-called reforms and crises go ... they just can not take and evaporate ...
    and then I remembered the law of communicating vessels from physics ... compared it turned out the same thing ... at one end a small vessel with citizens' savings at the other end of the barrel with stolen money from the oligarchs ...
    as soon as the level of savings rises above the norm in a small vessel, the so-called kranik hehe hechubais reforms opens and the surplus money from the people smoothly flows into a barrel of money for oligarchs and a handful of all kinds of rich people.


    So, the task of the government and even better of society is to swap these two vessels, it is desirable without revolutions and wars ... the task is very difficult in the current conditions.
    1. Titsen
      Titsen 26 January 2018 06: 34 New
      +1
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      the task is very difficult in the current environment.



      Rather - impossible!
      1. Vard
        Vard 26 January 2018 07: 05 New
        +1
        It's like getting a non-commissioned officer widow ... to carve herself ... But one moment ... she was nevertheless carved ...
    2. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 26 January 2018 07: 48 New
      +4
      Robin Hood robbed the rich and gave to the poor.
      Robin Bad robbed the poor and gave to the rich.
      This is called the Dough Cycle in nature! fellow
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 26 January 2018 07: 01 New
    +3
    it really just becomes more talkative
    A talking room, but many want to light up on it to show their involvement in something "worldly". And for me, the most interesting thing in Davoss is where Poroshenko ambushed Trump for a photo with subsequent victorious broadcasts in the Ukrainian media.
  4. Alex66
    Alex66 26 January 2018 07: 38 New
    +5
    In this sense, our entire Russian bourgeoisie, the oligarchy, are also means. Unfortunately, this does not reach them in any way, and they expect that someone will leave them in this very elite.
    Golden words, all patriotism, Crimea, the rearmament of our elite are needed so that we protect their capital, earn them yachts and mansions, the mentality of our oligarchs and officials does not differ from the Ukrainian, our only got a bigger piece. Our elite is ready to betray their people in exchange for recognition of their right to Russia and we will have tolerance, refugees, gay marriages. We are saved only by the fact that the Western oligarchs do not recognize our upstarts.
  5. BAI
    BAI 26 January 2018 09: 06 New
    +2
    What good is this bunch of fat cats? A discussion of Ukraine is even more useful. So soon and before discussing the events of House-2, you can roll.
  6. uskrabut
    uskrabut 26 January 2018 10: 39 New
    +5
    Funny article. Rogues gathered in Davos to decide how to rob people further. Further robbery is already unrealistic, because people already have nothing. Therefore it is necessary to make them slaves. You just need to know the history, and there the slave system is characterized as ineffective and leading to the degradation of productive forces, the decline of technology. Welcome to antiquity!
    Davos will not decide anything until humanity streamlines the stock market - the main destabilizing factor in the global economy. Will explain. When stocks are sold at prices that promise a payback period of hundreds of years, this is clearly a speculative operation that has nothing to do with investments. Thus, money goes from the real sector of the economy to the virtual one, that is, it ceases to fulfill its functions, goods are no longer bought with this money, they are out of circulation. When the stock price reaches the limit, and they stop buying, there is an avalanche-like drop, because it is necessary to sell more quickly in order to save at least part of the invested money. As a result, the depreciation of shares and the ruin of their owners. As always, the casino is the winner. And to prevent such processes from happening, the bourgeoisie should agree that the sale price of shares should be limited by a reasonable payback period on investments due to dividends (maximum 20 years).
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 26 January 2018 12: 56 New
      +4
      Quote: uskrabut
      When stocks are sold at prices that promise a payback period of hundreds of years, this is clearly a speculative operation that has nothing to do with investments.

      ... when they sell crude oil and minerals at a speculative price ... they sell treasury bonds, secured by interest payments on beautiful pieces of paper with an intricate pattern of pale green and light pistachio flowers ... "- and so on!
      Such "tricks" in the existing capitalist "economy" (just like that - in quotation marks!) - "like Don Pedrov in Brazil!" - and you won’t count! ...
    2. gladcu2
      gladcu2 27 January 2018 06: 07 New
      +1
      The market is the basis of speculation. Speculation under socialism is a crime, on an especially large scale - execution.

      Socialism is an economic system with strict control of profits and a ban on speculation. Instead of a market, a balanced planned economy
  7. CONTROL
    CONTROL 26 January 2018 12: 48 New
    +4
    ... and finally, that it:
    1% of the world's population owns 82% of all world wealth
    On what basis - owns? Legally? But what about "all mine - said gold; all mine - said damask"?
    And - poverty does occur when there is an abundance of planetary resources - precisely because of the "possession of 82% of all wealth"; world finances go in the wrong direction - not in those sectors and areas of labor and capital application where necessary! And sane people have been talking about this for quite some time! there was such a movement, “The Zeitgeist Movement” - unsuccessfully defamed by pro-globalist media.
    ... Yes, and GDP for 30 years has not been considered sane economists as an indicator of the success and health of the economy of any country! Here always they will be ahead of the United States, if only with a continuously operating printing press and demonstrative contempt for their economic and political obligations, and systematic violation any contracts!
  8. nsws3
    nsws3 26 January 2018 12: 49 New
    +1
    Everything is unchanged, as the system under the pharaohs crowd-elitist remained. There is a crowd, but there is an "elite" only signs change, feudalism, capitalism. The essence is essentially the same.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 January 2018 22: 51 New
      +1
      Human society, as it existed along the pyramid, will continue to exist until it disappears.
  9. dvvv
    dvvv 26 January 2018 13: 15 New
    +2
    most pinned Dvorkovich in Davos. In an interview about sanctions against the oligarchs, he did not blush, saying that there were no oligarchs in Russia for a long time, but there were successful and socially responsible businessmen! So ... So everything is fine, there are only big Western bourgeois left to convince
  10. kipage
    kipage 26 January 2018 20: 27 New
    15
    Where are the gladiator games?)
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 January 2018 22: 54 New
      +1
      On tablets - there they are issued to all participants. Medvedev fought ten fights in a row - the minister from Portugal.
  11. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 27 January 2018 23: 17 New
    0
    Feel the difference

    Netanyahu, in Davos, in the process of meeting with European leaders and Trump, meanwhile, drove Croatia the old Israeli F-16. And not just like that, but by agreeing that Israel will equip them with its avionics (also not the newest - 2001 of the year), well, until the heap, it will also sell all our missiles. In short, he earned half a billion dollars on Croats.

    Abbas, frustrated because of Pence and Trump, and most importantly because of the EU commissars, who, having been scared, threw him, refusing to declare the Ramallah organized criminal group, and even after that, called on to stop paying the terrorists, decided to console himself and bought for 50 million dollars personal plane from the ticket office of autonomy.
  12. Okolotochny
    Okolotochny 30 January 2018 17: 25 New
    +4
    Mikhail3,
    Clearly, they read out, overheated. Have a rest.
    1. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 31 January 2018 16: 27 New
      0
      Yes, I understand ... You can’t break the taboo. That is, to discuss incompetence you yourself know who you yourself understand what. And therefore, in our simplest calculation, something like 15 of civilizations already existed. And from the present 14 no distinct traces.
      I strongly suspect that they stumbled on the same. When technology and population come to a point beyond which old management methods are simply not possible. But there are no new ones, in the sense there are, of course, but they come into conflict with selection.
      People who want it are being selected for power now. So they want everyone to do everything for her, while they show great talents in gaining power. Without this in any way, because there are a lot of people who want it, everyone is terrible as a nuclear war, strong, mean ... ideal. So the most gifted win.
      And here they are at the top. And here we also need very, very large talents and skills ... only they, these talents, fundamentally contradict those that led the person to the top. A personality type even needs a different one. Horror. A man conquered a planet. And now you need to be able to fly on it! And the man - soaked with an ax, in the bloodstream on a poppy seed ... Well then, what ?!
      Transfer the planet to another? Then why are you? Get out ... impossible. Here we have Putin in power strangely turned out to be. Power was transferred to him, he himself would never have won it, a personality type is different. So he stands as the only adult among a flock of defective kids ... But the rest will not give up, they will die better, and they will take with them how much it will turn out!
      And what is the way out? Simplify the task! So that the authorities again lacked the thirst for this very power, plus cruelty, cunning and anger. That is - a huge war, to reduce the population and destroy the "extra" technology. And since people have power in the modern world, and they can’t imagine what their military aspirations will lead to, plus they are indestructibly sure that they just represent ... Soon again kirdyk. This time a nuclear-biological one.
      The financiers who rule the world today by ignorance and stupidity will give odds to anyone. At the same time, having learned their wild fen, they consider themselves educated and smart ... as if they did not sterilize the planet to the simplest geniuses. In general, my stupid insolence will soon be irrelevant.