Military Review

Bandera question

39
In the Carpathian region, in the presidential residence "Sinegora" Petro Poroshenko recently held a meeting in a narrow top circle. It is noteworthy that, among other things, the Speaker of the Rada Parubiy and the head of the National Security and Defense Council Turchinov were present; Interior Minister Avakov and Ex-Prime Minister Yatsenyuk refused to attend; A representative of the US embassy was not invited. The list of participants and non-participants in this meeting speaks about the current political situation in the Bandera remake four years after its formation and prospects.




There is a split of the ruling elite of the “Bandera democracy”, behind which stands the American embassy, ​​the arbiter of all the “young independent democracies”, and this arbiter, that is, the judge, relies again on Arseniy Yatsenyuk and his comrades. After a rest in Los Angeles, Yatsenyuk plunged into parliamentary activity, ardently supported the adoption of the law “on reintegration” - the war in the Donbas, and, as we see, is very cold towards Poroshenko. Like the US embassy in Kiev, which criticizes Poroshenko for the “wrong” bill introduced to the Rada on the Anti-Corruption Court.

By the way, this split of the junta, and the position of the US embassy, ​​explain the continuation of Mikhail Saakashvili’s adventures in Kiev, who also arrived to Ukraine from the USA, and the integrity of Mihomoydan, still under Avakov’s sensitive guardianship, which is still overclocked, apparently waiting for the fourth anniversary “ revolution gidnosti.

Kiev political analyst Mikhail Pogrebinsky called the Rada’s adopted law “On the Reintegration of Donbass” also “the first step towards war with Russia.” This follows from the text of the law. Other experts recall Poroshenko’s words about a “politico-diplomatic” solution of the Donbas issue with the help of the law “On Reintegration”, which, as it were, excludes the war in Donbas from the current agenda. They believe that "reintegration" can be directed inside Ukraine, up to the imposition of martial law in Lviv and Transcarpathia. What is Poroshenko's ploy here? - Probably, the American ambassador Marie Jovanovic does not know either.

The moment of truth will probably be Poroshenko’s signing of a law on “reintegration” - a war that he promises to do. The “war party” in Kiev, headed by Yatsenyuk, will demand the literal implementation of this law, that is, the commencement of hostilities in the Donbas, along with the American embassy and the Maidan of “Saakashvili”.

Russia is also preparing for the force option, the special representative of the Russian Federation in Minsk, Boris Gryzlov, said that “the United States sanctioned the force solution of the Donbass issue” with the law “on reintegration” adopted with their submission. Add, coinciding with the presidential elections in Russia with a view to delegitimizing them. With the adoption of the law “on reintegration”, Poroshenko can legally begin military operations in the Donbas.

Moscow, in order to declare its position, is waiting for the official entry into force of this law, where Russia is called the “aggressor” and the “invader”, who disavows the Minsk agreements. What will be the answer? Vladimir Zhirinovsky on air Vladimir Solovyov said that he would submit to the Duma a bill on denouncing the Grand Treaty of Friendship between Russia and Ukraine. There used to be precedents when Zhirinovsky predicted the actions of the Kremlin. Such an answer to Russia will have major consequences, not only for Ukraine, but also for Europe and America.

For four years now, the Bandera issue has revolved around the transit of Russian gas to Europe. Nobody knows when Moscow will gather with the spirit and put an end to the Ukrainian transit, or will Bandera help with this? Plans to blow up the "pipe" from the "Bandera guides" were, but they were frightened by the wrath of Berlin and Europe.

Today, Europe has somehow become less concerned about its own interests in Ukraine, the United States has become more active, but their Russian-European “pipe” does not care at all, even if it explodes. This pipe can explode if a “reintegration” war begins in Ukraine, because it is impossible to predict where and how it will end. In this respect, the mining and infantry brigade of the Donbass rotation by rotation in Transcarpathia 128 is noteworthy, to the place of permanent deployment, although this fact can be interpreted in different ways, given the aggravation of relations between Kiev and Budapest.

Poroshenko is now under suspicion of his Western donors, formally, not in opposition to corruption. In fact, the list of claims against Poroshenko is different and much larger. The US demand from Poroshenko for anti-corruption reform of the country is the famous American “impracticable requirement”, or another operation “under a false flag”, which often ends in death for the patient.

If Poroshenko postpones the signing of the law “on reintegration” - to the war, sending it to the back of the Constitutional Court, or postpone the war announced in that Donbas, this law, Arseniy Yatsenyuk can join Mihomaydan, and with Avakov and the US embassy, ​​together with the Nazi “Azov” the demand for the immediate creation of the Anti-Corruption Court, and the national impeachment of the “huckster Poroshenko”. And Poroshenko will be the second Yanukovych ...

George Soros, the famous American prophet, again turned his eyes on Europe in an interview with the Financial Times: “The European Union is an institution that is on the verge of collapse. Now Russia is a resurgent force. ” Given the special “love” of Soros for Russia, it is difficult to explain such a forecast by his flattery to Russia. As for the collapse of the European Union, it is inevitable if the transit of Russian gas stops, other prophets have been talking about this for a long time, including adviser to President Reagan, economist Paul Craig Roberts. In other words, Soros from America foresees the explosion of a transit gas pipeline in Ukraine.
Author:
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 25 January 2018 15: 11
    +6
    Personally, I didn’t care what they had there and how. But the attitude of our politicians is alarming. A policy of waiting, trying to pacify someone with whom you can’t put up with can lead to failure.
    1. Sapiens 63
      Sapiens 63 25 January 2018 15: 34
      +2
      Unfortunately, direct military support of the republics in the event of an APU offensive cannot be dispensed with, as well as losses in people and reputation and new sanctions. Plus, the moral state of the Armed Forces of the Republic is no longer so, people are tired of the war, the establishment of popular commanders, the distribution of power, etc.
    2. Berber
      Berber 25 January 2018 16: 24
      +7
      How many times have this been discussed. GDP did everything right. The strategy and tactics of the cavalry strike is good to a limited extent. Need to be able and wait. Sorry for the people of course. But on the other hand, what would happen if we fully got involved in the conflict. Think over the consequences.
      1. 210ox
        210ox 25 January 2018 17: 02
        11
        Yes, there wouldn’t be anything. They turned off the swift? They closed the Sberbank? There would have been a chorus and the roar of a driven mammoth. They would have saved people. They would have raised their authority. And now, all the trash of the Russian people and the country are kicking.
        Quote: BerBer
        How many times have this been discussed. GDP did everything right. The strategy and tactics of the cavalry strike is good to a limited extent. Need to be able and wait. Sorry for the people of course. But on the other hand, what would happen if we fully got involved in the conflict. Think over the consequences.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 26 January 2018 00: 06
          10
          Quote: 210ox
          Yes, there wouldn’t be anything. They turned off the swift? They closed the Sberbank? There would have been a chorus and the roar of a driven mammoth. They would have saved people. They would have raised their authority. And now, all the trash of the Russian people and the country are kicking.
          Come on! The United States initially embarked on an Ukric adventure in the hope that Russia would engage in a military scam to bring the "fraternal people" to life, so that Moscow would not stop the United States from redrawing the Middle East at its discretion. As a result, in Syria we would have already profaned everything, including our last base in Tartus, together with our interests in B. Vostok, and here we would have been bogged down to the ears by uniting the whole of Europe against ourselves, which might have already escalated from the Russian-Urkinian conflict into full-scale war between NATO and Russia at the European theater of operations. Mattresses in any situation would remain aloof and receive their dividends.
          1. Hlavaty
            Hlavaty 26 January 2018 15: 55
            +4
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            As a result, in Syria we would have already profaned everything, including our last base in Tartus along with our interests in B. Vostok, and here we would have been bogged down to the ears uniting Europe all against ourselves, which could have already grown from the Russian-Urkain conflict into full-scale war between NATO and Russia

            Oh do not scare yourself. When Russia forced Georgia to peace, did the West really do something? Except yelling in the media. They respond to power and determination solely with fear. Look at how the DPRK blew the United States twists, and they only cheeks puff.
            And Russia after Crimea suddenly took and stopped (despite the rather massive support of the southeastern regions). The West regarded this stop as indecision caused by fear of the West. And since the “client is vibrating”, then it is necessary to “crush” it, which they immediately began to do through sanctions and psychological pressure.
            If Russia had shown decisiveness in defending its zone of interests and drove anti-Russian militants back into caches, then the West would have perceived this as the natural right of the strong man to restore order in his zone of interests. Just because they themselves would have acted like that themselves. Like normal predators.
            There is a separate section in jurisprudence - victimology. Studying the psychology of the victim. So it is scientifically proven that criminals feel people who are ready to be scared and give everything away. The predator feels the prey. But if the victim shows determination and readiness for resistance, then in most cases the offender does not aggravate the situation, but switches to another victim.
            So it is here. The West is a predator, and any indecision provokes it to increase pressure. And his readiness to fight back causes fear in him.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Hlavaty
                Hlavaty 26 January 2018 18: 20
                +5
                Just yesterday I registered and in the very first comment I started with insults. Learn Maidan education.
            2. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 26 January 2018 20: 57
              +3
              Quote: Hlavaty
              Oh do not scare yourself. When Russia forced Georgia to peace, did the West really do something? Except yelling in the media. They respond to power and determination solely with fear.
              Nobody scares anyone. Georgia was a check for lice. The United States studied the degree of pressure on the Russian Federation, which comes with a military response. They hoped that Russia would express a protest, note, concern and puffed out cheeks, but they did not really believe that their “six” would rake the real go-ahead. At the same time, the Six was fully confident that the United States would certainly engage in battle in order to protect the ally. Both Georgians and Americans screwed up.
              Quote: Hlavaty
              Look at how the DPRK blew the United States twists, and they only cheeks puff.

              Well, you compared! The US has a direct conflict with the DPRK, without intermediaries! The United States for the first time in many years faced nose-to-nose resistance and realized that the cheek on the nose would be painful and, most importantly, personal, and they prefer to act with the wrong hands.
              Quote: Hlavaty
              And Russia after Crimea suddenly took and stopped (despite the rather massive support of the southeastern regions). The West regarded this stop as indecision caused by fear of the West. And since the “client is vibrating”, then it is necessary to “crush” it, which they immediately began to do through sanctions and psychological pressure.
              Where did you stay? After 2014, ending with the Crimean theme in 2015, Russia began working in Syria, where it decently leaned on a coalition of 60 countries including the United States. The crush on them did not grow.
              Quote: Hlavaty
              If Russia had shown decisiveness in defending its zone of interests and drove anti-Russian militants back into caches, then the West would have perceived this as the natural right of the strong man to restore order in his zone of interests. Just because they themselves would have acted like that themselves.
              Soon, anyone who needs it will arrive in a targeted and sufficient quantity, but this will be done exclusively in the framework of retaliatory measures.
              1. Hlavaty
                Hlavaty 26 January 2018 22: 51
                +2
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                Well, you compared! The US has a direct conflict with the DPRK, without intermediaries!

                Well, you compared! Some kind of DPRK (with two nuclear bombs) and a nuclear power Russia, capable of destroying the United States. And what about Russia and the United States love through intermediaries?
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                Where did you stay? Russia after 2014 year, ending with the Crimean theme in 2015 year, began to work in Syria

                They stopped in Ukraine. From your words, for the sake of the Gazprom war in Syria.
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                Soon, anyone who needs it will arrive in a targeted and sufficient quantity, but this will be done exclusively in the framework of retaliatory measures.

                Well, of course! The eternal "Russian style" - endless attempts to make friends with scumbags until they give in the face and just a little after they give. Well, and then yes ... of course ... Europe to shreds!
                1. Nyrobsky
                  Nyrobsky 26 January 2018 23: 37
                  +4
                  Quote: Hlavaty
                  Well, you compared! Some kind of DPRK (with two nuclear bombs) and a nuclear power Russia, capable of destroying the United States.
                  Vladimr, you are promoting your truth, and you are right about it (10 missiles to the DPRK and 1000 missiles from Russia), but you persistently lose sight of one nuance. USA for no reason will not go to direct military conflict with Russia, as it threatens mutual destruction. therefore mattresses fight with Russia indirectly and by proxysetting his sixes. In the situation with the DPRK, the Americans are "one on one"without the possibility of a military solution to the Korean problem by drawing other countries into the conflict. Even if one Korean missile reaches its goal, it will be a global defeat for the United States.
                  Quote: Hlavaty
                  They stopped in Ukraine. From your words, for the sake of the Gazprom war in Syria.
                  Not for the sake of the Gazprom war, although Russia's energy interest is far from last. Without Russian intervention in the Syrian conflict, Damascus would not have lasted six months. With the fall of Damascus, the question would arise of closing the Russian Navy base in Tartus, respectively, Russia would be completely squeezed out of the Mediterranean.
                  Quote: Hlavaty
                  Well, of course! The eternal "Russian style" - endless attempts to make friends with scumbags until they give in the face and just a little after they give.

                  But the demonstration of this style will happen very soon, but everything will be limited solely to the territory of a young but not to the extent of a greyhound in a new European country. All Europe to tear to shreds, this time no one will.
                  1. Hlavaty
                    Hlavaty 27 January 2018 00: 02
                    +1
                    Quote: Nyrobsky
                    The United States will never go to a direct military conflict with Russia, because it threatens mutual destruction. Therefore, mattresses are at war indirectly with Russia,

                    That is why Russia can very well afford to give in to these "alien hands" for its pleasure. And as a result, there will be nothing besides squeals and sanctions.
                    Quote: Nyrobsky
                    Not for the sake of the Gazprom war, although Russia's energy interest is far from last. Without Russian intervention in the Syrian conflict, Damascus would not have lasted six months. With the fall of Damascus, the question would arise of closing the Russian Navy base in Tartus

                    Your cart ran ahead of the horse. A military base is not an end in itself, but an instrument for achieving goals. But the goal was to prevent the construction of a gas pipeline through Syria from the rich deposits of Qatar to the Mediterranean Sea, where Europeans can buy this gas. Then Gazprom will have to compete, change prices, profit to lose. Horror is easy!
                    Because the war in Syria is so generously funded by Russia, in contrast to the war in the Donbass. Moreover, Russia is not interested in a complete cessation of the war in Syria - if there is a peaceful life, the Syrians may want to participate in the gas pipeline, make money on gas transportation and negotiate with Qatar. And Gazprom does not need this at all. Therefore, in Syria there will be a sluggish war for a long time.
          2. Berber
            Berber 26 January 2018 16: 51
            0
            You can’t explain anything to them stubborn. There is no imagination in people.
        2. Berber
          Berber 26 January 2018 08: 49
          +1
          How simple it is for you. The Americans are pulling us into this conflict. Probably they have already painted the consequences? Nord Stream 2 and South Stream would wave our hand at least.
          1. 210ox
            210ox 26 January 2018 10: 09
            +6
            Listen. Do Russia need a pipe? Even two? We need it. But besides these pipes, there are lots of industries in the corral that our management cannot shake. Maybe the main thing is not the priority of these pipes? And is there anyway we can’t move the economy from the dead center inside the country? the leading countries are moving forward and we can’t catch up with gas export by the standard of living. And yet. I’m pretty sure that transit through Ukraine will remain. Maybe less.
            Quote: BerBer
            How simple it is for you. The Americans are pulling us into this conflict. Probably they have already painted the consequences? Nord Stream 2 and South Stream would wave our hand at least.
      2. Hlavaty
        Hlavaty 25 January 2018 17: 28
        +9
        Quote: BerBer
        what would happen if we fully got involved in the conflict. Think over the consequences

        It would be the same: sanctions, screams, etc. But there would be no rulers in Kiev who dream of starting a war with Russia.
        And it would be easier to worry about sanctions if the Ukrainian agricultural and industrial complex was at hand.
        1. Berber
          Berber 26 January 2018 08: 54
          +3
          Bandera was not born from scratch. Nationalism has been nurtured throughout the post-Soviet era. You think to solve it at a time. No, let them cook in their own (shit) juice. Gorge, then it will be easier.
          1. Alber
            Alber 26 January 2018 11: 36
            +1
            Quote: BerBer
            Bandera was not born from scratch. Nationalism has been nurtured throughout post-Soviet times.

            The name "Bandera" appeared on behalf of Stepan Bandera, a baptized Jew (godfather). The movement was funded, nurtured again by Jewry
          2. Hlavaty
            Hlavaty 26 January 2018 15: 34
            +2
            Quote: BerBer
            No, let them cook in their own (shit) juice. Gorge, then it will be easier.

            You say so, as if it was a couple of months. And it lasts for years, decades. During this time, a new generation has grown up which, apart from the nationalist brainwashing, knows nothing. They are no longer "full" as you put it - they simply do not know anything else. And since there is no intelligible alternative propaganda, then they don’t have to find out from.
            Your words are an attempt to justify the inaction of Russia. But this is not necessary. The result is important. And he is reached by the one who CONTINUOUSLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY works for the result. Anyone who does not work or does it irregularly and haphazardly usually loses.
            1. Berber
              Berber 26 January 2018 15: 53
              0
              What actions of Russia would you like to see?
              Just submit an idea.
              If you conduct active hostilities, Russia's foreign trade will receive less than several hundred billion. Because the sanctions imposed by the West will be justified. Our economy, despite the bravura reports, is stagnating. The entire sanction blow was taken by medium and small businesses. The continuation of sanctions, we can pull, but not for long.
              And now, what is the Russian government doing? And the government is waiting - when a burden called Ukraine becomes overwhelming for the United States. They cannot swallow this piece.
              1. Hlavaty
                Hlavaty 26 January 2018 16: 08
                +2
                Quote: BerBer
                And now, what is the Russian government doing? And the government is waiting - when a burden called Ukraine becomes overwhelming for the United States. They cannot swallow this piece.

                Waiting and catching up is the destiny of the weak. If Russia itself has recorded itself as weaklings, then let it sit waiting by the sea for weather.
                But the United States and Europe will not simply give Ukraine away. They simply do not understand investors. So much money invested and what is the result? No result so far. So if you are waiting for “when a burden called Ukraine becomes overwhelming for the United States,” then you’ll get worse. Because with Ukraine there are only two options: either the West will make a ram from Ukraine, Poland, Romania and the Baltic states and the war will spread to South-West Russia or Russia will restore the order it needs in Ukraine, so that the rest will lose their desire to fight.
                The remaining options are from the evil one and for the oligarchs. Although it seems that even the Russian oligarchs began to reach slowly (judging by the statements of Kostin in Davos).
                1. Berber
                  Berber 26 January 2018 16: 13
                  0
                  Suggest something intelligible. So that without sacrifices and with a minimum of consequences.
                  1. Hlavaty
                    Hlavaty 26 January 2018 16: 20
                    +2
                    "without casualties and with a minimum of consequences" could be before the perestroika. When Gorbachev began to ruin the country, blood began to pour. And after the collapse of the USSR, it was said that Russia could achieve something naively without casualties. And the more time passes, the greater the price that Russia will have to pay to defend its interests. We need to talk about how much time will pass on the moment when the price for Russia becomes unbearable. That is what the West is seeking.
                    So "without sacrifices and with a minimum of consequences" will not work.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 25 January 2018 17: 48
      0
      Natsik stirred. And where will Poroshenko do the “good deeds”? belay
    4. Dr_engie
      Dr_engie 28 January 2018 00: 11
      +2
      It’s just that in reality the Ukrainians are not so scary and cruel as our media are painting. The authorities, obviously, know this, and therefore it is not worth wondering that all of them are “opposed” exclusively on the TV screen.
      Still, there are so many moans about the supply of weapons from the United States, and they themselves are still returning equipment from the Crimea to them. Straight miraculous miracles are happening.
  2. SPLV
    SPLV 25 January 2018 15: 34
    +7
    And they will begin in February. Like Georgians. To the Olympics. At the same time, “athletes from Russia” are being driven out of Korea.
    This is a modern trend - to a new Olympics - a new war.
    1. dSK
      dSK 25 January 2018 17: 03
      +1
      Quote: SPLV
      to the new Olympics - a new war.
      The Armed Forces of Ukraine conduct mine clearing of the gray zone near Horlivka. This was reported by DNR intelligence. According to the Donetsk military, the actions of Ukrainian punitive means preparing for a large-scale offensive. As reported war correspondent Semen Pegov, The Armed Forces of Ukraine conduct mine clearing of the gray zone near Gorlovka using special equipment. Thus, the Ukrainian military is preparing safe corridors for the advance of their infantry, as well as assault groups, accompanied by tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, he said. According to him, this information was confirmed by two sources in the power structures of the Donetsk republics. (Channel "Tsargrad" 16:29, 25.01.18/XNUMX/XNUMX)
      1. Normal ok
        Normal ok 31 January 2018 17: 59
        0
        Quote: dsk
        The Armed Forces of Ukraine conduct mine clearing of the gray zone near Horlivka. This was reported by DNR intelligence.

        They are constantly reporting something. That's just the truth in this, it is good if 30%.
    2. alavrin
      alavrin 25 January 2018 17: 11
      +3
      Not by February. And by the beginning of the World Cup.
      1. Alber
        Alber 26 January 2018 11: 39
        0
        Quote: alavrin
        Not by February. And by the beginning of the World Cup.


        So the World Cup will be foiled - boycotted ...
    3. avt
      avt 25 January 2018 19: 59
      +1
      Quote: SPLV
      This is a modern trend - to a new Olympics - a new war.

      Yes. A written order to wage war is practically required of a piglet; he does not want to leave documentary evidence, as previously Trupchinov
      request Going through a cavalry raid is not a problem. And then what to do on the territory ?? As well as in LNR, it’s already clear that the view of peaceful life is already more or less crystallizing, like a free-will end, civilian government structures are being formed. The same Zakharchenko and ... Plotnitsky were regularly taken to Aksyonov in Crimea and obviously not on vacation. fetus, you can be poisoned.
  3. izya top
    izya top 25 January 2018 16: 29
    +4
    The representative of the US Embassy was not invited.
    what is this ?! riot ?! angry
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 25 January 2018 17: 47
      +6
      The representative of the embassy was a janitor, so they did not invite. smile
  4. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 25 January 2018 18: 27
    +5
    News of the First Channel .... When there is nothing to write or you don’t cut into the direct themes of the site, write about Ukraine. Once again about Ukraine .... Then again about Ukraine.
  5. Streletskos
    Streletskos 25 January 2018 20: 04
    15
    How much attention?
  6. Antares
    Antares 26 January 2018 00: 41
    +1
    A little better than usual. True stamps and slogans no less. Well, at least something more than just them.
    Position-fluctuates with the lines of the party. Predict always not very ... neither with Trump nor with Ukraine does not work.
  7. gla172
    gla172 26 January 2018 05: 00
    0
    "A crest will remain a crest
    Though you let him in Europe
    Where to act with the mind,
    He only annoys f * ck.

    And that is why in Russia
    Bequeathed as much by Monomakh:
    "Contact God forbid!
    With three - Zhidom, Khokhl and Lyakh. "

    The insidious train, although blind;
    Puffy Lyakh - worse than bl ** and,
    Crest - eat the bread with you,
    And then shit in your soup "(c).

    "Ukrainians" T.G.Shevchenko 1851
  8. nakhtigalsif
    nakhtigalsif 26 January 2018 06: 18
    0
    Quote: Hlavaty
    Quote: BerBer
    what would happen if we fully got involved in the conflict. Think over the consequences

    It would be the same: sanctions, screams, etc. But there would be no rulers in Kiev who dream of starting a war with Russia.

    ... Nepanyatna wassat It was necessary to fight a war, so that there would be no war ... request
    1. Hlavaty
      Hlavaty 26 January 2018 20: 42
      +1
      For example, they are at war with terrorists so that there is no terror - is it pannyat here?
  9. sergevonsohrn
    sergevonsohrn 26 January 2018 13: 14
    +3
    a typical situation among Ukrainian "national patriots"! during the German occupation, the Oun split into three branches, at odds with each other no less fiercely than against the "commies" and "Muscovites"! they couldn’t decide at all - which of them loves the “great Fuhrer Adolf Hitler” more .... now, it seems, everything is as then! only the "Fuhrer" is another .....
  10. JonnyT
    JonnyT 29 January 2018 15: 14
    +1
    the vat with g0vn..m starts to boil again, now the main thing is that it g0vn ... doesn’t splatter the sun, it’s the World Cup, the world doping competitions and finally the elections.
    As for the APU, they are advancing - they are constantly writing that the APU will go on the offensive, that it just doesn’t go in any way.
    No gunpowder, it’s better to send APU to the Hungarians with the Romanians than to seriously fight the Russian Federation. Makhamaydans and egg-laying will be crushed, it’s not Yanukovych’s vegetable for you, but a rich rich Jew. for which oligarchs from the Russian Federation are ready to "write"
    Moreover, Gunpowder himself seeks contacts (salvation) with Vova, which means that he will never go to a clear and inapplicable war
  11. Normal ok
    Normal ok 31 January 2018 17: 56
    0
    Russia is also preparing for a force-based version, Russia's special envoy in Minsk, Boris Gryzlov, said that "the United States has sanctioned the use of force to resolve the Donbass issue," the law on reintegration adopted with their submission. Let us add by confining it to the presidential election in Russia with the aim of delegitimizing it.

    It is possible that Putin himself needs a war before the election. This will rally the Russians around him. And the elections can be held later.
  12. The comment was deleted.