58 years ago the world's first nuclear submarine was launched. Secrets of "Nautilus" ("Nautilus")

21


21 January 1954, the nuclear submarine "Nautilus" ("Nautilus") was launched. It was the first submarine with a nuclear reactor, allowing months to be in the autonomous navigation without lifting to the surface. A new page has opened in stories Cold War ...

The idea to use a nuclear reactor as a power plant of submarines originated in the Third Reich. Prof. Heisenberg’s non-oxygen-using “uranium machines” (the so-called nuclear reactors at that time) were intended primarily for the “underwater wolves” Kriegsmarine. However, the German physicists failed to bring the work to a logical conclusion, and the initiative passed to the United States, which for some time was the only country in the world with atomic reactors and bombs.

In the early years of the Cold War between the USSR and the USA, long-range bombers were thought to be American carriers of the atomic bomb. The United States had extensive experience in the combat use of this type of weapon, the American strategic aviation possessed a reputation as the most powerful in the world, finally, the territory of the United States was considered largely immune to the enemy’s retaliatory strike. However, the use of aircraft required their base in close proximity to the borders of the USSR. As a result of the diplomatic efforts undertaken in July 1948, the Labor Government agreed to deploy 60 B-29 bombers with atomic bombs in the UK. After the signing of the North Atlantic Pact in April 1949, all of Western Europe became embroiled in the US nuclear strategy, and the number of American bases abroad by the end of the 1960s reached 3400!



However, over time, the US military and politicians have come to understand that the presence of strategic aviation in foreign territories is associated with the risk of a change in the political situation in a particular country, therefore the carrier of nuclear power weapons in the future war, the fleet was increasingly seen. Finally, this trend strengthened after convincing tests of atomic bombs near the Bikini Atoll.

In 1948, the American designers completed the development of the design of a nuclear power plant and proceeded to the design and construction of an experimental reactor.
Thus, there were all prerequisites for creating fleet nuclear submarines, which not only had to carry nuclear weapons, but also had an atomic reactor as a power plant.

Construction of the first such boat, named in honor of the fantastic submarine, invented by Jules Verne, "Nautilus" and having the designation SSN-571, began 14 June 1952, in the presence of US President Harry Truman at the shipyard in Groton.

58 years ago the world's first nuclear submarine was launched. Secrets of "Nautilus" ("Nautilus")


21 January 1954, in the presence of US President Eisenhower "Nautilus" was launched, and after eight months - September 30 1954 - adopted by the US Navy.
17 January 1955, the "Nautilus" went on sea trials in the open ocean, and its first commander, Eugene Wilkinson, broadcast on the air in clear text: "Let's go under the atomic engine."
Apart from an absolutely new power plant “Mark-2”, the boat was of the usual design. With a Nautilus displacement of about 4000 tons, the twin-shaft nuclear power plant with a total power of 9860 kilowatts provided a speed of more than 20 nodes. The submerged sailing range was 25 thousands of miles with 450 consumption of grams U235 per month. Thus, the duration of the voyage depended only on the correct operation of the means of air regeneration, food stocks and endurance of personnel.

At the same time, however, the specific gravity of the nuclear installation turned out to be very high, because of this, it was not possible to install part of the weapons and equipment provided by the project on Nautilus. The main cause of weighting was biological protection, which included lead, steel and other materials (about 740 tons). As a result, all the weapons of the Nautilus were 6 nasal torpedo tubes with ammunition in 24 torpedoes.

* * *
As in any new business, it was not without problems.

Even during the construction of the Nautilus, and specifically during the testing of the power plant, there was a rupture of the secondary circuit, through which saturated steam with a temperature around 220 ° C and under pressure 18 atmospheres came from the steam generator to the turbine. Fortunately, it was not the main, but an auxiliary steam line.

The cause of the accident, as established during the investigation, was a manufacturing defect: instead of pipes made of high-quality carbon steel A-106, pipes of less durable material A-53 were included in the steam line. The accident forced American designers to question the feasibility of using welded pipes in submarine systems operating under pressure.

Elimination of the consequences of the accident and the replacement of already assembled welded pipes with seamless ones delayed the completion of the Nautilus construction for several months.

After the launch of the boat, rumors began to circulate in the media, as if Nautilus personnel received serious doses of radiation due to flaws in the bioprotection structure. It was reported that the naval command had to urgently make a partial replacement of the crew, and put the submarine in the dock to make the necessary changes to the protection design. How true this information is, is not known until now.



4 May 1958 of the year on the "Nautilus", submerged from Panama to San Francisco, there was a fire in the turbine compartment. The ignition of the oil-borne left-sided turbine insulation was found to have started a few days before the fire, but its signs were left without proper attention. A slight smell of smoke was taken for the smell of fresh paint. The fire was discovered only when the finding of personnel in the compartment because of the smoke became impossible. There was so much smoke in the compartment that the submariners in smoke masks could not find its source.

Without finding out the reasons for the appearance of smoke, the ship commander gave the order to stop the turbine, ascend to the periscope depth and try to ventilate the compartment through the snorkel. However, these measures did not help, and the boat was forced to float in the surface position. Reinforced ventilation of the compartment through the open hatch with the help of an auxiliary diesel generator finally brought its results. The amount of smoke in the compartment decreased, and the crew managed to find a place of fire. Two sailors in smoke masks (there were only four such masks on the boat) with the help of knives and pliers began to tear off the glowing insulation from the turbine hull. A column of flame about a meter high was knocked out from under the torn piece of insulation. In the course went foam extinguishers. The flames were shot down and the insulation stripping continued. People had to change every 10-15 minutes, as acrid smoke penetrated even into masks. After only four hours, all the isolation from the turbine was removed and the fire extinguished.
After the arrival of the boat in San Francisco, its commander carried out a number of activities aimed at improving the fire safety of the ship. In particular, the old insulation was removed from the second turbine. Insulating breathing apparatus was provided to all personnel of the submarine.

In May, the 1958 of the year, during the preparation of the Nautilus for a trip to the North Pole by boat, the water flow of the main condenser of a steam turbine installation took place. Seawater infiltrated into the condensate-nutrient system could be the cause of salinization of the second circuit and entail the failure of the entire energy system of the ship. Repeated attempts to find a leak did not lead to success, and the submarine commander made an original decision. After the arrival of the “Nautilus” in Seattle, sailors in civilian clothes - the preparation of the campaign was kept strictly confidential - they bought up all the patented liquid in automobile stores to fill the radiators of cars to stop leaks.
Half of this liquid (about 80 liters) was poured into the condenser, after which neither in Seattle nor later did the problem of salinization of the capacitor arise during the trip. Probably, the flow was in the space between the double tube plates of the condenser and stopped after pouring this space with a self-hardening mixture.

10 November 1966 of the year during the NATO Navy exercises in the North Atlantic "Nautilus", which went into the attack in the periscope position on the American aircraft carrier "Essex" (displacement 33 thousand tons), collided with it. As a result of the collision, the aircraft carrier received an underwater hole, and the fence of the sliding devices was destroyed on the boat. Accompanied by the destroyer, the Nautilus reached its own speed at a speed of about 10 nodes to a naval base in New York, overcoming a distance of about 360 miles.

* * *
22 July 1958, the Nautilus, commanded by William Andersen, left Pearl Harbor to reach the North Pole.

It all started with the fact that at the end of 1956, the head of the Navy Admiral Burke received a letter from Senator Jackson. The senator was interested in the possibility of actions of atomic submarines under the pack ice of the Arctic. This letter was the first sign, which made the command of the American fleet seriously think about organizing a campaign to the North Pole. True, some of the American admirals considered the venture reckless and was strongly opposed. Despite this, the commander of the submarine forces of the Atlantic fleet considered the polar campaign to be a decided matter.

Anderson began to prepare for the upcoming campaign with tripled zeal. A special equipment was installed on the Nautilus, which made it possible to determine the state of the ice, and the new MK-19 compass, which, unlike ordinary magnetic compasses, operated in high latitudes. Just before the trip, Anderson got the most recent maps and charts from the depths of the Arctic, and even made a flight, the route of which coincided with the planned Nautilus route.
19 August 1957 "Nautilus" headed for the area between Greenland and Spitsbergen. The first trial exit of the submarine for pack ice was unsuccessful. When the sonar meter recorded zero ice thickness, the boat attempted to surface. Instead of the expected polynya, the Nautilus met a drifting ice floe. From a collision with it, the boat severely damaged the only periscope, and the commander of the "Nautilus" decided to go back to the edge of the packs.
The twisted periscope was repaired in field conditions. Anderson was rather skeptical about how stainless steel welders work - even under ideal factory conditions, such welding required a lot of experience. Nevertheless, the crack formed in the periscope was repaired, and the device began to act again.



The second attempt to reach the pole did not bring results either. A couple of hours after the Nautilus crossed the 86 parallel, both gyrocompasses failed. Anderson decided not to tempt fate and gave the order to turn - at high latitudes even a tiny deviation from the correct course could be fatal and lead the ship to a foreign coast.
At the end of October, 1957, Anderson delivered a white paper at the White House, which was devoted to a recent march under the Arctic ice. The report was listened to with indifference, and William was disappointed. The stronger was the desire of the commander of the "Nautilus" to go to the pole again.

Thinking over this voyage, Anderson prepared a letter to the White House, in which he convincingly argued that going over the pole would become a reality next year. From the presidential administration made it clear that the commander of the "Nautilus" can count on support. The idea became interested in the Pentagon. Shortly thereafter, Admiral Burke reported on the impending campaign to the President himself, who was very enthusiastic about Anderson’s plans.

The operation was to be conducted in an atmosphere of strict secrecy - the command feared a new failure. Only a small group of people in the government knew about the details of the campaign. To hide the true reason for installing additional navigation equipment on the Nautilus, the ship’s participation in joint training maneuvers together with the Skate and Khafbik boats was announced.

9 June 1958, the Nautilus set off on his second polar voyage. When Seattle was left far behind, Anderson ordered the submarine number on the fencing of the wheelhouse to be painted over to keep it incognito. On the fourth day of the journey, the Nautilus approached the Aleutian Islands. Knowing that he would have to go through shallow water, the captain commanded the ascent. The "Nautilus" maneuvered for a long time in the area - looking for a convenient break in the chain of islands to get to the north. Finally, navigator Jenkins discovered a fairly deep passage between the islands. Having overcome the first obstacle, the submarine entered the Bering Sea.
Now the Nautilus had to slip through the narrow and ice-covered Bering Strait. The path to the west of the St. Lawrence Island turned out to be completely closed by pack ice. The draft of some icebergs exceeded ten meters. They could easily crush the Nautilus, pushing the submarine to the bottom. Despite the fact that much of the journey was completed, Anderson gave the order to follow the reverse course.

The commander of the Nautilus did not despair - perhaps the eastern passage through the strait would be more friendly to rare guests. The boat emerged from the Siberian ice and headed south of St. Lawrence Island, intending to pass into the deep waters past Alaska. The next few days of the march passed without incident, and in the morning on June 17 the submarine reached the Chukchi Sea.

And then Anderson's bright expectations collapsed. The first alarm was the appearance of an ice floe of nineteen meters thick, which went straight to the submarine ship. Collisions with her were avoided, but the recorders of the instruments warned: an even more serious obstacle was in the path of the boat. Having nestled to the very bottom, the Nautilus slipped under a huge ice floe at a distance of only one and a half meters from it. To avoid death was only a miracle. When the pen of the recorder finally went up, indicating that the boat had missed the ice floe, Anderson realized: the operation had failed completely ...



The captain sent his ship to Pearl Harbor. There was still hope that at the end of the summer the border of the ice would move to deeper regions, and one more attempt could be made to get to the pole. But who will give her permission after so many failures?

The reaction of the top US military was immediate - Anderson was summoned to Washington for an explanation. The commander of the "Nautilus" was doing well, showing perseverance. His report for senior Pentagon officers expressed the firm conviction that the next, July, march would undoubtedly be crowned with success. And he was given another chance.

Anderson immediately began to act. To observe the ice situation, he sent his navigator Jenks to Alaska. For Jenks, they composed a legend according to which he was an officer of the Pentagon who was endowed with special powers. Arriving in Alaska, Jenks took to the air almost all the patrol aircraft, which daily conducted observations in the area of ​​the future route "Nautilus". In mid-July, Anderson, who was still in Pearl Harbor, received the long-awaited news from his navigator: the ice situation became favorable for the transpolar transition, the main thing is not to miss the moment.

22 July nuclear submarine with wiped numbers left Pearl Harbor. "Nautilus" was going at maximum speed. On the night of July 27, Anderson led the ship to the Bering Sea. Two days later, having completed the 2900-mile journey from Pearl Harbor, the Nautilus had already cut the waters of the Chukchi Sea.

1 August submarine descended under the pack ice of the Arctic, sometimes going into the water to a depth of twenty meters. To carry out the "Nautilus" under them was not easy. Almost all the time, Anderson himself was on watch.

The crew of the ship was excited about the upcoming event, which I wanted to note properly. Some, for example, suggested twenty-five small circles be described around the pole. Then the "Nautilus" could enter the Guinness Book of Records as a ship, the first in the history of navigation 25 committed world voyages in one trip. Anderson rightly believed that such maneuvers are out of the question - the probability of losing the course is too great. The commander of the Nautilus was worried about completely different problems. To cross the pole as accurately as possible, Anderson did not take his eyes off the pointers of electronic navigation devices. 3 August at twenty-three hours and fifteen minutes the goal of the campaign - the North Geographical Pole of the Earth - was reached.

Without lingering around the pole longer than required by collecting statistical information on the state of ice and seawater, Anderson sent a submarine into the Greenland Sea. Nautilus was to arrive in the Reykjavik area, where a secret meeting was to take place. The helicopter, which was waiting for the submarine at the rendezvous point, removed only one person from the submarine, Commander Anderson. Fifteen minutes later, the helicopter landed in Keflavik next to the transport plane ready for dispatch. When the aircraft’s wheels touched the landing strip of the airfield in Washington, Anderson was already awaited by a car sent from the White House — the president wanted to see the Nautilus commander. After the report on the operation, Anderson was again returned to the boat, which during this time had reached Portland.



Six days later, the Nautilus and its commander entered New York with honor. A military parade was organized in their honor ...

* * *
Among modern myths there is one.
It is said that experiments on the establishment of a telepathic connection were conducted on the submarine "Nautilus".

This information was voiced at the end of the 1950-s by two French conspiracy theorists - Louis Powell and Jacques Bergier. Their article did not pass by the attention of the Soviet authorities defending the country from a potential aggressor. 26 March 1960, Minister of Defense Marshal Malinovsky received a report from the engineer-colonel, Ph.D. Poletayev:

"In the US Armed Forces adopted telepathy (transfer of thoughts over a distance without the help of technical means) as a means of communication with submarines sailing ... Scientific research on telepathy has been conducted for a long time, but since the end of 1957, large research organizations have joined the work USA: Rend Corporation, Westinghouse, Bell Company Phone and others. At the end of the work, an experiment was carried out - transmitting information via a telepathic connection from the base to the submarine “Nautilus”, which was submerged under the polar ice at a distance of 2000 kilometers from the base. The experience was a success. ”

The Minister, as expected, became keenly interested in such a startling success of a potential adversary. Several secret meetings were held with the participation of Soviet specialists in parapsychology. The possibility of opening works on the study of the phenomenon of telepathy in the military and military medical aspects was discussed, but at the time they ended in nothing.

In the middle of 1990, the correspondents of the Chicago magazine ZIS WICK took a series of interviews with Captain Nautilus Anderson. His answer was categorical: “There was definitely no telepathy experience. The article of Lord and Bergier is entirely false. 25 July 1960, the day when, according to the authors, the Nautilus went to sea to conduct a telepathic communication session, the boat was in dry dock in Portsmouth.

These statements were verified by journalists through their own channels and turned out to be true.
According to the author of the book “Parapsychological War: Threat or Illusion,” Martin Ebon, behind the articles on “Nautilus” was ... The USSR State Security Committee! The purpose of the "duck", according to the author, is quite original: to convince the Central Committee of the CPSU to give the go-ahead to the beginning of similar work in the Union. Say, party leaders, educated in the spirit of dogmatic materialism, were prejudiced against idealistic parapsychology. The only thing that could push them to develop relevant research was information about successful developments abroad ...

* * *
3 March 1980 of the year “Nautilus”, after 25 years of service, was expelled from the fleet and declared a national historical monument. Plans were made to convert the submarine to a museum for public display. After the decontamination was completed and a large amount of preparatory work was completed on 6 on July 1985, the Nautilus was towed to Groton, Connecticut. Here at the US Submarine Museum, the world's first nuclear submarine is open to the public.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    21 January 2012 11: 51
    For some reason I always thought that the Soviet submarine was the first to visit the pole.
    I wonder if the fact was the case whether the United States can claim the shelf?
    1. +2
      21 January 2012 16: 02
      The first nuclear-powered submarine to surface at the pole was the USS Skate (SSN-578)
      1. 0
        21 January 2012 16: 05
        You're right. This boat was the third US nuclear submarine, the second to visit the North Pole and the first to emerge there.
  2. 755962
    +3
    21 January 2012 12: 00
    The first atomic boat, the first trips to the Arctic Ocean, she had to pass many tests in 25 years of service before becoming a museum of the submarine fleet. I pay tribute to the courage of American sailors.
  3. 0
    21 January 2012 14: 09
    "the incredible adventures of the captains of the nautilus"
    interesting..
  4. +2
    21 January 2012 14: 42
    A huge milestone in the arms race. And then someone calls the USSR the militarized monster - even though the nuclear bomb, the atomic submarine, the nuclear aircraft carrier --- they all made the US the first, and the USSR had to respond to threats.
    1. -1
      21 January 2012 16: 04
      Wrong, Kars.
      With the same success, Americans can say that the Nautilus submarine was the answer to the 100.000 T-54 / 55 tanks

      Both powers were militarized, but the US also developed the civilian sector.
      1. +1
        23 January 2012 12: 15
        And "Dropshot" (and similar plans) by chance was not born in the United States? Or maybe the T-55 began to rivet from 1945?
  5. -3
    21 January 2012 16: 18
    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
    response to 100.000 T-54 / 55 tanks

    Lope lope?
    Compared to the multinational standard US Navy and nuclear stockpile, our tank armies look pale.
    And I imagine how our tanks are transported across the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean to the shores of the United States

    21 January 1954, in the presence of US President Eisenhower "Nautilus" was launched, and after eight months - September 30 1954 - adopted by the US Navy.
    Do not tell me how many the USSR had T-54 / 55 tanks then?
    1. -3
      21 January 2012 19: 42
      Lope lope?
      Illiterate Kars bulged his eyes on the well-known figure)))

      And I imagine how our tanks are transported across the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean to the shores of the United States
      Yeah ... what can I say. A person has a mental disorder

      Do not tell me how many the USSR had T-54 / 55 tanks then?
      Thousand 50-60
      1. 0
        21 January 2012 19: 57
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        Illiterate Kars bulged his eyes on the well-known figure)))

        or maybe you will open competent eyes and take a look at least at Wikipedia
        In total, taking into account the options made in other countries, it was released before the 100 000 T-54 / 55, which made it the most numerous tank in history.

        With what joy do you attribute to the USSR all 100 thousands?
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        that the Nautilus submarine was a response to the 100.000 T-54 / 55 tanks

        So you are our literate, you just lied
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        And I imagine how our tanks are transported across the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean to the shores of the United States
        Yeah ... what can I say. A person has a mental disorder


        Sorry, but this is your genius that gives in response to our tanks the construction of a submarine, not the serial production of the M47 and M48
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        Do not tell me how many the USSR had T-54 / 55 tanks then?
        Thousand 50-60


        Of course, the T-55 adopted by 1958 is especially likely, and somehow it does not notice 8 000 M48 and 8 500 M47
        1. -2
          22 January 2012 00: 32
          In short, comrade Kars gotten up on his stupidity and began to look for miserable excuses.

          Regarding the tanks and the ocean, obviously Kars cannot guess on its own, you have to tell:
          All the scenarios of the Third World War looked the same: Russian tanks were tearing towards Gibraltar, the USA was bombing the European part of the USSR. Therefore, the number of tanks mattered, Russian tanks were the main threat.

          as it does not notice 8 000 M48 and 8 500 M47
          This paragraph generally amused me.
          The Soviet group in Eastern Europe usually numbered up to 20 000 tanks. The Americans had nothing to oppose to them on land, so the Yankees developed aviation and the navy, their original strengths.

          Of course, the T-55 adopted by 1958 is especially likely
          At least you read Wikipedia, it pleases
          1. 0
            22 January 2012 00: 59
            Do not tell my slippers

            someone froze about 100 000 T-54 / 55 in 1954 and now it freezes am
            Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
            All the scenarios of the Third World War looked the same: Russian tanks are rushing to Gibraltar

            uncle, what gibbeltar? from which oak tree did you collapse? English Channel
            Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
            US bomb European part of the USSR

            instead of not bombing the European? well, you are a connoisseur. What year are you describing? before or after the deployment of the Pershing in Europe?
            Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
            The Soviet group in Eastern Europe usually numbered up to 20 000 tanks

            uncle and where else is 80 000? is it really against China?
            Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
            The Americans had nothing to oppose them on land

            as I understand it, you exclude the technology of the countries of the NATO Block from the list?
            Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
            therefore, the Yankees developed aviation and the navy, their original strong areas

            Probably they only knew about the Soviet tanks about it? Otherwise they thought we were on the shores of the ocean.
            Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
            Of course, the T-55 adopted by 1958 is especially likely
            At least you read Wikipedia, it pleases

            since there are so many T-1954 tanks in 55, but it wouldn’t hurt you to read it at least, maybe you’ll stop driving the blizzard
            1. -3
              22 January 2012 15: 18
              uncle, what gibbeltar? from which oak tree did you collapse? English Channel
              Awful, Kars, conceive)))

              as I understand it, you exclude the technology of the countries of the NATO Block from the list?
              Yes. If the conversation is about the beginning of 50x, this figure can be neglected.
              1. +2
                22 January 2012 18: 02
                Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
                If the conversation is about the beginning of 50x

                in principle about the end of 50 x or rather 1954, but with your alternative history where the USSR can have everything in the 1954 100 000 T-54 / 55.

                Although it is unclear why this should be neglected, there are Shermanov there, probably, a thousand 5 of various modifications of the type, the remains of German tanks

                And on the other questions there is nothing to say? Freeze?
  6. Capt.stryker
    +6
    21 January 2012 17: 24
    Quote: koosss
    "the incredible adventures of the captains of the nautilus"
    interesting..


    There is a very good book - "Around the World Under Water" (published by the USSR Ministry of Defense, Moscow - 1965), this is a collection of essays written by the commanders of the American nuclear submarines "Nautilus", "Skate", "Sea Dregon" and "Triton", though in abbreviated translation, but nevertheless the reading is very interesting and exciting. So: this article is trite from this book, the chapter of the author William Anderson "Nautilus" at the North Pole. The only difference is that in the book events are described in the first person.
  7. Capt.stryker
    +4
    21 January 2012 20: 03
    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
    Do not tell me how many the USSR had T-54 / 55 tanks then?
    Thousand 50-60

    Information:
    About 35 thousand were produced in the USSR. cars, another 5,5 thousand in Poland and Czechoslovakia, more than 16 thousand were built under license and without any clones in China in China
    How many tanks of this type were actually in the SA, I have not yet found information, but in any case, in the USSR there were more tanks of all types than in the rest of the world combined.
    1. 0
      21 January 2012 20: 28
      In the USSR, there were never more than 60 tanks at the same time, including outdated and mothballed ones. At least this figure with the indicated conditions has been met in several different sources. I don’t remember which ones specifically, don’t ask, but I’m sure that such a quantity is enormous.
      1. -1
        22 January 2012 00: 37
        Forced to disagree with you. I met the following figure: at the end of the Second World War, the USSR tank fleet consisted of 30-35 thousand vehicles, and it managed to thin out over the next decade. Given the massive emergence of new designs in the post-war years, the 60.000 figure could be exceeded (especially if you take into account obsolete and conservation)
        1. -1
          22 January 2012 01: 57
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          next figure: at the end of the Second World War, the USSR tank fleet consisted of 30-35 thousand vehicles, and it managed to thin out over the next decade.

          Oh yes, I see you are a fan of Soviet tank building ---- to keep tanks of military production in service, although the designers themselves wrote in 1945 and understood that they were not suitable for peacetime - not that quality.

          Well, we are talking about the T-54 / 55 tanks
          Quote: Kars
          Do not tell me how many the USSR had T-54 / 55 tanks then?

          and you’ve already done everything you can --- and there were 9 thousands of tanks on 1945 in May 25.2 - of which 5.3 were thousand heavy, 11 were thousand medium - and notice not a single T-54 / 55
          1. -3
            22 January 2012 15: 19
            Remain in your opinion. Clowns need Russia
            1. 0
              22 January 2012 17: 57
              I'm from Ukraine.
              And the clown here is YOU, no logic, no knowledge
              your arguments to accept so the USA stamped 50 000 Shermans for the war, then they have everything in service

              learn the mate part - can Gibraltar mix the Channel
              and lie
  8. 0
    21 January 2012 20: 37
    .. I didn’t understand one thing here, here is a photo of our 627 project and ZhMT-705 pr. ????
    1. 0
      21 January 2012 20: 45
      And who knows ... If Capt.Stryker told the truth, then it seems that this is not an article, but a student’s abstract.
      1. 0
        23 January 2012 12: 21
        Well, if you take into account the phrase "After the boat arrived in San Francisco, its commander carried out a number of measures aimed at increasing the ship's fire safety.", then the author's incompetence is beyond doubt. I would like to see the commander - a jack of all trades. He is a commander and an engineer and a builder and the Navy's Main Command at the same time. And all the relevant services are on the side
  9. Capt.stryker
    +5
    21 January 2012 22: 01
    Quote: desava
    If Capt.Stryker told the truth, then it seems that this is not an article, but a student’s abstract

    Capt.Stryker told the truth. Now this book is at my fingertips. I can even imagine a table of contents:

    Foreword ................................................. ....................
    ............... p. 5

    William Anderson. Nutilus at the North Pole. .............. page 17

    James Calvert. Under the ice to the pole (Submarine "Skate") ......... p.103

    George Steele. Swimming "Sea Dregon". .................................... p. 221

    Edward Beach. Around the world under water (nuclear submarine "Triton"). ............ p. 314

    Norman Polmar. The death of Thresher. ......................................... p. 455

    The total volume of the book is 516 pp.

    I recommend to all lovers of marine science (NOT Marinina!), The reading is fascinating, swallowed in one breath. I myself read this book for a very, very long time, but from the first paragraphs of this article I recognized a familiar text.
  10. Jupiter
    0
    22 January 2012 11: 21
    Is it single-hull or what? portholes seem to be visible in the photo ..
    Americans are the same to me, romantics are bad ... :))
    1. 0
      22 January 2012 11: 29
      There are no portholes on a combat submarine, let alone an atomic one (albeit the first, albeit the Nautilus). In the photo, not portholes, but scuppers in the superstructure for draining water after surfacing - the superstructure is permeable.
    2. -1
      22 January 2012 11: 39
      Finger do not deign to poke, where did you see the portholes there?
  11. Tishkin
    0
    1 October 2013 10: 14
    I was very pleased with this: "On the night of July 27, Anderson took the ship out to the Bering Sea. Two days later, having covered the 2900-mile route from Pearl Harbor, the Nautilus was already cutting through the waters of the Chukchi Sea." A simple calculation shows that the speed of the "Nautilus" throughout this route was over 60 knots !!! Well, nonsense !!!
  12. +2
    4 June 2014 20: 35
    Interestingly, the author thought a little when he collected this amusing collection of long-known "secrets" from the Internet. Well, this passage
    The idea of ​​using a nuclear reactor as a power plant for submarines arose in the Third Reich.
    and bewitches in general: how could it be without a gloomy Teutonic genius? After all, they all invented it, from a nuclear reactor (which they didn’t even have, apart from the well-known idle construction) and a time machine to horse walks in the fresh air.

    The construction of the first such boat, named after the fantastic submarine invented by Jules Verne, the Nautilus
    The Americans did not need to refer to the creative heritage of the famous science fiction writer, since Robert Fulton as early as 1800 (28 years before the birth of Jules Verne) proposed to Napoleon a project of a submarine called the Nautilus.

    The rest and I do not want to comment, hodgepodge.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"