In Germany, experienced a "safe" active tank protection system

44
German company Rheinmetall has successfully tested a new active system tank protection, which, according to the developers, does not pose a danger to armored vehicles and infantry located next to the protected machine. According to Breaking Defense, it was possible to make the system safe thanks to the technology of close interception, in which a flying missile is destroyed close to the tank.

The new system is called ADS. It consists of sensors for the early detection of ammunition, electronic-optical systems for confirming the approach of rockets and shells, a computer system and devices for shooting off striking elements.



In Germany, experienced a "safe" active tank protection system

Fuchs armored personnel carrier with ADS system


The principle of operation of ADS is relatively simple. At some distance from the protected machine, early detection sensors “detect” the approaching ammunition. The system takes him to support, determines the flight path and calculates the approximate place in which he can get. Then, close to the armored ammunition, electro-optical systems are detected.

Shooting systems for striking elements are activated just before the ammunition touches the armor. In Rheinmetall claim that the striking elements in this case, fly a short distance from the armored vehicles, where there is no infantry and other armored vehicles. At the same time, even undermining the flying ammunition will not damage the machine, since there will be no direct contact with the armor.

The new active protection system can be installed not only on the tank, but also on any other type of armored vehicles. ADS tests were carried out on the Leopard II main battle tank and the Fuchs wheeled armored personnel carrier. The checks are successful. Other details about the future system are not specified, reports "N + 1"

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    23 January 2018 14: 23
    Well then you have to shoot a doublet wassat Once solitary does not work ...
    1. +3
      23 January 2018 14: 30
      The cartoon is mediocre, the Israelis draw better, and yes, they still know how to do active defense, not only draw. Russia and Israel do, the rest draw
      1. +14
        23 January 2018 15: 24
        Quote: Chertt
        The cartoon is mediocre, the Israelis draw better, and yes, they still know how to do active defense, not only draw. Russia and Israel do, the rest draw


        raynmetal is still no empty idle talk. envy therefore silently.
        1. +12
          23 January 2018 15: 28
          Quote: vlad_vlad
          raynmetal is still no empty idle talk. envy therefore silently.

          Everything happens the first time. Once CNN reported the news, but did not invent it.
        2. 0
          24 January 2018 05: 21
          Quote: vlad_vlad
          raynmetal is still no empty idle talk. envy therefore silently.

          if they showed a fragment of shelling ... and so far there is nothing to envy. declare "success" can be anything.
      2. 0
        23 January 2018 16: 38
        Quote: Chertt
        The cartoon is mediocre, the Israelis draw better, and yes, they still know how to do active defense, not only draw. Russia and Israel do, the rest draw

        laughing and they have tanks designed by the Germans, which also have German units))), and you further believe how much the pace in iron is cool.
  2. +4
    23 January 2018 14: 26
    With this approach, just jewelry accuracy is needed, I wonder how it will work in real life
    1. +6
      23 January 2018 14: 36
      But how it will not work. What is a faster-flying projectile, or this whole chain of actions to prevent it from hitting a target? Yes, and they decided to shoot down not on the fly, but in the very vicinity of the equipment body.
    2. kig
      0
      24 January 2018 05: 06
      it is said The principle of operation of ADS is relatively simple
  3. +2
    23 January 2018 14: 28
    this is a clone of the Israeli light KAZ short-range along the way, they put the same on SUVs and light BMs.
  4. +5
    23 January 2018 14: 33
    At the same time, even undermining the flying ammunition will not harm the car, since there will be no direct contact with the armor.

    And that the shock wave from the explosion does not harm either the sensors or the foot soldiers nearby? belay
    More wonderful and wonderful. As one little girl said.
  5. +5
    23 January 2018 14: 33
    An Arab with a rag will be included? To wipe the sensors.
    Judging by the RPG-7 commercial with a tandem grenade, this protection will pass at a time, only the leading charge will be lost.
    1. +6
      23 January 2018 15: 15
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Judging by the RPG-7 commercial with a tandem grenade, this protection will pass at a time, only the leading charge will be lost.

      The tandem grenade is doubtful, but the RPG 30 "Hook" is just designed to overcome the KAZ.
      1. +2
        23 January 2018 16: 09
        Quote: kapitan92
        Tandem grenade doubtful

        Why is this? It is long, the sensor will work on the head part - everything will go through it, and the main one will fly.
        1. +3
          23 January 2018 19: 11
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Why is this? It is long, the sensor will work on the head part - everything will go through it, and the main one will fly.

          Detonates! hi
        2. +2
          23 January 2018 21: 14
          Quote: Gray Brother
          and the main one will fly.

          There, the knock sensor is common, that is, when the nose is destroyed, the back will not detonate
          1. 0
            23 January 2018 23: 43
            Quote: ProkletyiPirat
            There, the knock sensor is common, that is, when the nose is destroyed, the back will not detonate

            It is a pity.
        3. 0
          23 January 2018 22: 05
          the grenade also deflects, in addition there a bunch of shrapnel and destroy the whole grenade.
  6. +2
    23 January 2018 14: 37
    Did the tests go on a computer monster? fool Any hacker can draw such a video now! Let them see the real tests on the tank, the photos will at least post the results - then there will be something to discuss, and not this computer sketch from students!
  7. +1
    23 January 2018 14: 37
    With the proliferation of such KAZ, it will be cheaper and smaller. I wanted to read the opinion of Oleg <professor> He most of all says that the tank is an anochronism. Although is it so?
  8. +10
    23 January 2018 14: 38
    “Systems for firing striking elements are activated an instant before the ammunition touches the armor” ///

    It looks more like an improved DZ than a AZ.
    A moment before the defeat, if the heads of the attacking rocket touch something, then it’s likely
    option that cumm.stroy will have time to form.
    And even partially dissipated by the oncoming charge, it will be able to pass light armored personnel carriers.
    In short, a risky "last-minute" way. recourse
    1. +2
      23 January 2018 14: 52
      I also thought about it, it’s enough to configure the operation of the attacking rocket a little earlier than touching the armor and the hole from the cum. jet provided
  9. 0
    23 January 2018 14: 38
    It looks like a Ukrainian kaz. The Barrier. Yes, and why is it safe for armored vehicles? Doesn’t a cumulative jet form in this case?
  10. 0
    23 January 2018 14: 39
    It looks like a Ukrainian kaz. The Barrier. Yes, and why is it safe for armored vehicles? Doesn’t a cumulative jet form in this case?
  11. +9
    23 January 2018 14: 45
    Rafael has already made such a system. Called Trophy LV. But Raphael is more modest than the Germans. He writes that the probability of infantry defeat is less than 1%. I would like to ask the Germans, and if the infantry is pressed to the armor?
    1. +7
      23 January 2018 14: 49
      even if it’s not pressed, because an approaching rocket can explode from exposure to kaz, blast wave, fragments
  12. +1
    23 January 2018 14: 59
    I have a question for specialists: will they ever be able to tilt the trajectory of shells with a magnetic field? Generally should not hurt the infantry ...
    1. +2
      23 January 2018 16: 36
      Quote: bogart047
      someday the trajectory of shells can be driven by a magnetic field

      When a mini-nuclear power plant can fit in the MTO of a tank, but non-magnetic ones have long been no news. Not special.
      1. +2
        23 January 2018 21: 23
        not magnetic steels will not help, with a sufficient density of the magnetic flux, or rather, with a sufficient density of atoms created by the magnetic field, we will get a "force field" aka "energy barrier", a similar effect has long been shown in science fiction, in real life we ​​don’t have understanding the principles of electromagnetic fluxes at levels less than the atomic one, which is much more important, and the impossibility of creating either formulas or installations arises from this. But sooner or later, such a technology will appear in view of the fact that without it, space exploration is impossible. But we most likely will not see this. hi
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  13. +9
    23 January 2018 14: 59
    Rheinmetall Defense - Active & Passive Protection Systems
    June 2016

    ... The work of the "Arena" soldier

    March 2014
  14. +1
    23 January 2018 15: 06
    It is interesting how external factors affect the operation of such a system. Indeed, due to close contact, a small delay in a split second will lead to a shell hit.
  15. +5
    23 January 2018 15: 11
    Well, probably this year KNUMX is known about this KAZ (if not more). It can hardly be called a “revolution”! The “analogue” (even approximate) is the Ukrainian “Barrier” (which in turn was created on the basis of the Soviet experienced KAZ "Rain") An analogue of this system can be made without any problems on the basis of the "Arena" (special modernization) or using the ammunition of the KAZ "Arena" and some technical solutions implemented in the KAZ "Barrier" ... Is it possible to pick up the "key" to the German "lock"? Well then ... let's try!
    1. Grenade (RPG), projectile --EFP charge ("impact core") and miniature laser rangefinder (non-contact fuse) 2. Cumulative "leader" fired near the target (main ammunition after it) ... technical solution implemented in ATGM "HOT-3" .... the principle of influence is somewhat similar to the "decision" of the RPG-30 "Hook".
  16. +4
    23 January 2018 15: 25
    The Germans have a protective munition that fires at the installation site and is directed steeper down ... That's the whole "upgrade"
    At the "Arena", - a trigger at a distance (after firing from a tank): soldier
    2009 g
    1. +3
      23 January 2018 15: 46
      Quote: san4es
      At the “Arena”, - a trigger at a distance (after firing from a tank)

      You do not understand me ! I meant the upgraded Arena or KAZ with the components of the Arena!
      1. +1
        23 January 2018 16: 00
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        ...You do not understand me !

        request ... So I'm not for you (in general) wink
        1. +3
          23 January 2018 16: 10
          So, I was wrong again! This is what happens when you "hang around at the computer for several hours, working with technical documentation; moreover, you jump into VO in fits and starts! That's it! It's time for a big deal!"
          1. +2
            23 January 2018 16: 16
            laughing ... Yes, everything is fine ... Here it doesn’t happen fellow
            ... It's all about the arrow to the right of "time" wink :
            1. +2
              24 January 2018 05: 22
              Thank you for prompting! And then I did not pay attention to it ... request
    2. +2
      23 January 2018 22: 08
      The arena is more reliable than the Germans. The disadvantage of the Arena is only radar, which stands out in height and is very vulnerable.
  17. +1
    23 January 2018 15: 41
    OH WHAT IS IT ???
  18. Maz
    +1
    23 January 2018 16: 22
    Quote: Chertt
    The cartoon is mediocre, the Israelis draw better, and yes, they still know how to do active defense, not only draw. Russia and Israel do, the rest draw

    The Germans have always been doing Jewish development with their prodigies. Improved, improved, upgraded to the extent that they came up with a new, unique and surprising, and the Israelis copied
    1. 0
      23 January 2018 16: 42
      Quote: Maz
      Quote: Chertt
      The cartoon is mediocre, the Israelis draw better, and yes, they still know how to do active defense, not only draw. Russia and Israel do, the rest draw

      The Germans have always been doing Jewish development with their prodigies. Improved, improved, upgraded to the extent that they came up with a new, unique and surprising, and the Israelis copied

      you are well informed wink
  19. +1
    23 January 2018 18: 05
    the usual land mine along the route or they will cover the MLRS and no protection will help ...
  20. 0
    23 January 2018 23: 44
    Clear. Trucks must be beaten under the body in the middle axle.
    But all KAZ have a drawback - it does not protect from above ..