Military Review

The first photos of the BMP interior on the Boomerang platform appeared on the Web.

36
The newest Russian wheeled infantry fighting vehicle K-17, created by the Boomerang platform, is currently the most mysterious of the entire range of promising Russian vehicles, writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta.


The first photos of the BMP interior on the Boomerang platform appeared on the Web.


“If the Armata, Kurganets-25, Coalition-SV self-propelled guns were described in sufficient detail by the Russian media, Boomerangs rarely appeared on television screens. In addition to direct participation in the Parades on Red Square, Nizhny Novgorod machines were shown only at the Army-2017 international military-technical forum. However, until now many questions have remained unanswered, ”the article says.



According to the author, part of the secrets of the promising machine will be revealed on the eve of the Defender of the Fatherland Day, when the premiere of the new release of the Military Acceptance program will be released on Zvezda TV channel. The transfer will be entirely devoted to "Boomerang."

Information about this is posted in Instagram. "Military Industrial Company", which is engaged in the development and production of armored vehicles. Here are photos that have never been published anywhere. For example, you can consider how the car looks from the inside.

You can also see special monitors with the help of which it is possible to control armaments, and to evaluate the advantage of installing a remote-controlled combat module.

The introduction of an isolated placement of ammunition not only secured the infantry, but also significantly improved their living conditions behind the armor, the author notes.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/KomandanteS17
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 23 January 2018 12: 49 New
    11
    I recall an old BMP-1 where the landing party sat on the sides with its back to the tank with a solarium.
    1. brr1
      brr1 23 January 2018 16: 52 New
      +2
      And I remember BMD-1, where the landing party was sitting like a sprat in a bank (those that are behind the tower an arrow, a grenade launcher and his assistant). Here the limousine is straight
  2. Gray brother
    Gray brother 23 January 2018 12: 51 New
    +2
    Good but not enough.
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 23 January 2018 13: 00 New
      +3
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Good but not enough.

      little, but Horrosho! (Let it be for now) wink
      1. Angel_and_Demon
        Angel_and_Demon 23 January 2018 13: 13 New
        +5
        not enough yes
        1. Per se.
          Per se. 23 January 2018 13: 55 New
          +9
          We can be proud, we will have the largest BTR in the world, "Stryker" in this confounded. If it is not enough, then there is still T-15 and “Kurganets”, they surpassed “Bradley” and “Warrior” everyone there. In my opinion, it would have been better to have let out the BTR-90 long ago, and better than the BMP-3, it is unlikely that they will be created in the foreseeable future. Of course, for anti-terrorist operations, as a police, anti-guerrilla vehicle, and demonstrators, where to frighten the crowd, “Boomerang” is a solid thing.
          1. Angel_and_Demon
            Angel_and_Demon 23 January 2018 14: 00 New
            10
            I agree - the visibility is awesome, you can get with your eyes closed
            1. Per se.
              Per se. 23 January 2018 14: 22 New
              13
              Quote: Angel_and_Demon
              with closed eyes you can get
              It's all about priorities, if you dwell on military columns that attack militants from ambushes in our rear, putting land mines, this is one thing, if a big war, this is another. We have taken the path of experience of local wars, anti-terrorist operations. Finally, making huge is simply physically easier than rationally compact. If you run into MRAP (mine resistant ambush protected - protected from undermining and attacks from ambushes, minostoykny zasadozashchishchennoy), then, of course, we have an armored troop-carrier for military columns, dwell on the landmine, but increase the height, making the target more vulnerable for PTR and armor-piercing shells. In the diagram, the usual truck and car with MRAP technology. What kind of war we are preparing for, if the “Syrian experience” also wants to be transferred to the snowy expanses, yes, under the deep rivers. So the show "tank biathlon", you see, will be the criterion for combat training.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 23 January 2018 16: 20 New
                +7
                Quote: Per se.
                We have taken the path of experience of local wars and anti-terrorist operations.

                Do you still believe that there will be a war like WWII with tank wedges and fire ramparts? Look carefully at the military conflicts of the past half century and answer your question: hasn't the strategy and tactics of war changed since the Second World War?
                Quote: Per se.
                We can be proud, we will have the largest armored personnel carrier in the world, "Stryker" in this is confounded.

                Seriously? Can I find out the dimensions of the Boomerang? Here is Stryker -
                BATTLE WEIGHT, t: 18,77.

                CREW, pers .: 3.

                OVERALL DIMENSIONS, mm: length - 6950, width - 2720, height - 2640.
                Can I find out what dimensions of the Boomerang?
                Quote: midivan
                Yeah, uuuzh, you’ll ride on the armor if you jump from the armor and break your legs.

                Sitting on the armor, you will be the first to turn into a cargo of 200, if you get into an armored personnel carrier or an anti-tank missile system or undermine a mine. In order to wean from the shoveling habit of moving on the armor and save the lives of fighters, they created armored capsules in Boomeranka so that such rams would not die with packs that like to ride on top.
                1. Ryazan87
                  Ryazan87 23 January 2018 17: 03 New
                  +3
                  Comrade back in the 40s: "... increase the height, making the target more vulnerable already for PTR and armor-piercing shells."
                  1. Per se.
                    Per se. 24 January 2018 06: 17 New
                    0
                    Quote: Ryazanets87
                    Comrade back in 40's: "...
                    "Comrade" had to trap an RPG or an ATGM, but hurried ... However, for your skepticism, I suppose, this changes little.
                2. Per se.
                  Per se. 23 January 2018 18: 33 New
                  +4
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  Do you still believe that there will be a war like the Second World War with tank wedges and firing shafts?
                  As one pop from the Soviet film said, - all people believe in something, some believe that there is a God, others believe that there is no God ... If a war begins, and, God forbid, a big war, from my "faith ", and in readiness for such a hard year, there will be much more benefit than your" optimism. " Generally, what will be the new war, more or less knew only the potential aggressor, and even then the plot was not always formed according to his ideas. As it develops historically, generals tend to prepare not for the war that comes, and rarely guessed real prospects. If you, Andrei, as they say, give your hand, guaranteeing a forecast, your business, but, I repeat, it is better not to be such an overconfident optimist for small and light war games. On your proposal, "pussies are measured" by "Striker", it is enough for me that I see in comparison in size. And, if you hold back, the BMP T-15 surely surpassed, like a mastodon monster, by all criteria even the freaks “Bradley” and “Warrior”.
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  To wean the habit of moving on the scoop on armor and save the lives of fighters, and create armored capsules in Boomeranka so that these rambi would not die in batches that they like to ride on top
                  Excuse me, did you ride armor, for example, on a mountain serpentine, when they can attack a column so that time is running out, and they will not even shoot at close range, and from all sides, but from above, almost at the roof? Here in such a miracle, “Boomerange”, “with a can of beer” inside, you will most likely die, even without having had these desired doors, “in the anus”, to open. On the armor went not only from the fact that there are more chances to survive when undermining a mine or a land mine, and that you could quickly jump and take up defense. Those who dream of seeing an air-raid shelter in the BMP or BTR, are cruelly mistaken, if such is the place in the war. No, there are no vehicles to be killed, and in the military columns in the same Afghanistan there were not only BMPs or armored personnel carriers with “fools” on the armor, there were trucks, truck cranes, tankers, ambulances in the column ... What should I do with them? If there was a competent guard, good intelligence, good work of sappers, well-coordinated traffic control, this was one of the main guarantees of successful passage, and this will remain central to local conflicts when walking columns in its rear, and not the birth of the Maus under the infantry. In the present war, from which no one is insured, all this will fade into the background. There were no such problems from the Wehrmacht in the same World War II, the columns were attacked by dive-bombers, and not German partisan saboteurs, armored vehicles would need another. As for your Boomerangs, so, as I said above, for the internal troops and the police will come down.
                  1. NEXUS
                    NEXUS 23 January 2018 18: 39 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Per se.
                    If a war starts, and, God forbid, a big war, my "faith", and when ready for such a dashing year, will be much more useful than your "optimism."

                    Dear, if a big war begins, the Boomerangs with the Armats will not be at the box office at all, maybe they will speak of a completely different weapon. So your speech about faith is not at the box office at all. And if you take into account the fact that HIGH-PRECISE weapons, including the Kyrgyz Republic, are being developed, the talk of a big war becomes quite ridiculous.
                    Quote: Per se.
                    Sorry, but you rode on armor, for example, on a mountain serpentine,

                    Skated so what?
                    Quote: Per se.
                    Those who dream of seeing a bomb shelter in an infantry fighting vehicle or armored personnel carrier are cruelly mistaken, if there is such a place in the war.

                    Dear, apparently our developers are really stupid ... they make armored capsules, all kinds of KAZs, new armor, etc., and then such a warrior comes and says, yes, it's all full of crap. You’ll have to ride on the armor and goals.
                    1. Per se.
                      Per se. 23 January 2018 19: 17 New
                      +3
                      Quote: NEXUS
                      Dear, apparently our developers are quite stupid ...
                      We expressed our opinion, I heard you, but you did not convince me. I think this is normal for discussion. I am not a fan of writing slogans, I hope that you were at least a little interested, and there was something to think about, and I hope very much that I personally did not offend you. All the best.
                  2. Sling cutter
                    Sling cutter 23 January 2018 19: 30 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Per se.
                    Sorry, but you rode on armor, for example, on a mountain serpentine, when they can attack the convoy so that time is running out, and they will not only shoot at point blank range, and from all sides, but also from above, practically into the roof?

                    by the way, very effective
                    Quote: Per se.
                    that there’s a better chance of surviving a mine or a landmine, and that you could quickly jump off and take up a defense.

                    So exactly soldier If you do not have time, then order your little brothers wooden jackets.
                    Quote: Per se.
                    military convoys in the same Afghanistan weren’t alone with armored personnel carriers or armored personnel carriers with “fools” on the armor, there were also trucks, truck cranes, tankers, ambulances in the convoy ...

                    Five columns of Kabul-Gardez for BZ
                    Quote: Per se.
                    good intelligence, good work of sappers, well-coordinated traffic control, this was one of the main keys to successful passage, this will remain the main one in local conflicts

                    10 columns "For Courage."
                    It is useless to explain this, that the bets, bmps and bmdeshki were used to deliver personnel, it was invented by old-timers in the early 80s, because when hit or detonated, the entire compartment is destroyed, and only the fur-water ... soldier
                    1. Dreamboat
                      Dreamboat 24 January 2018 00: 15 New
                      +1
                      It is ridiculous to read people who do not understand the difference between infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers. The armored personnel carrier should not go on the attack on artillery and ATGM, it has other tasks.
                      And artillery has changed since the Second World War, the guided (and even homing) ATGM is not critical to the height of the target ...
                      And you don’t need fairy tales about riding on armor, such a practice arose because there was simply no place inside the “armor” for everyone (and even what it was - you won’t fit in, but to go in a convoy in the tented Urals is definitely suicide. Then this practice was surrounded by “legends” and a halo of coolness. The currents of the 200s and 300s during such trips were obtained due to weak roadside land mines or during sniper fire.
                    2. Per se.
                      Per se. 24 January 2018 06: 02 New
                      0
                      Quote: Stroporez
                      10 columns "For Courage."
                      My respect for you!
              2. ProkletyiPirat
                ProkletyiPirat 23 January 2018 21: 59 New
                0
                Quote: Per se.
                In the diagram, the usual truck and car with MRAP technology. What kind of war we are preparing for, if the “Syrian experience” also wants to be transferred to the snowy expanses, yes, under the deep rivers. So the show "tank biathlon", you see, will be the criterion for combat training.

                Dear, where did the picture come from?
                1. Per se.
                  Per se. 24 January 2018 05: 59 New
                  +1
                  Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                  where does the picture come from?
                  Rolf Hilmes, "Protecting Ground Forces' Combat Machines from Min. Opportunities and Boundaries" (http://btvt.info/3attackdefensemobility/mines.ht
                  m). Alternatively, in the search engine "protection of armored vehicles from explosions," then look for images in pictures.
          2. yarema vishneveckiy
            yarema vishneveckiy 23 January 2018 14: 38 New
            +1
            Btr 90 breaks through. Even armor-piercing bullets. Bmp 3 made of aluminum alloy. There is no mine protection. This technique. The best case of the late 20th century
            1. Per se.
              Per se. 23 January 2018 18: 44 New
              +1
              Quote: yarema vishneveckiy
              BTR 90 breaks through. Even armor piercing bullets. Bmp 3 aluminum alloy.
              A "UAZ" with machine guns from the "Syrian experience", from what century? The BTR-90 is a good car, not deservedly condemned, like the BMP-3, will remain the best in its class for many years to come. What is the "Boomerang", which did not even go through the entire test cycle, was not adopted, from which it will burn or just break, now remains a big question, but what is already a large-sized lateral and frontal projection goal, obviously.
              1. Dreamboat
                Dreamboat 24 January 2018 00: 27 New
                0
                BTR 90 sued time, it wasn’t brought to mind in the 80s, and funding ended in the 90s. And the armor protection of the 90th (as far as I remember) is not much better than the 80th.
                BMP 3 in service, ordered a little again, due to funding. But the output over the engine is of course F ___!
                "Boomerang" without weapons tests no one will accept, do not worry. And what is high - so far no one knows the niche assigned to him. And then, the geometric height of the machine almost does not affect the probability of its defeat - the height (size) of the armored capsule affects it. And the fact that the armored capsule is raised above the ground - reduces damage from explosive devices.
          3. midivan
            midivan 23 January 2018 15: 16 New
            +4
            Quote: Per se.
            We can be proud, we will have the largest armored personnel carrier in the world

            Yeah, uuuzh, you’ll ride on the armor if you jump from the armor and break your legs.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 23 January 2018 16: 38 New
              +3
              Quote: midivan
              Yeah, uuuzh, you’ll ride on the armor if you jump from the armor and break your legs.

              So ... it's just a constructive way to wean the personnel to ride on the armor.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 23 January 2018 16: 52 New
                +5
                Quote: Alexey RA
                So ... it's just a constructive way to wean the personnel to ride on the armor.

                This is a way to convey a simple idea that people are running out and should be protected. What is the use of modern weapons if there are no people who will use them? It finally dawned on our MO that millions of drug losses were useless to us.
              2. midivan
                midivan 23 January 2018 18: 22 New
                +2
                Quote: Alexey RA
                So ... it's just a constructive way to wean the personnel to ride on the armor.

                Many do not wean smile need to burn there (in a good and in a good way).
    2. seti
      seti 23 January 2018 13: 46 New
      +4
      If soon the video on the Military Acceptance is enough. There will be something to see. I hope soon the first deliveries to the troops.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 23 January 2018 14: 14 New
        10
        Quote: seti
        I hope soon the first deliveries to the troops.

        There will be no serial deliveries before 20 years. All the equipment, that of the Armata line, that Kurganets or Boomerang, are all new equipment that requires running-in, testing, and refinement. That is why they are modernizing the old Soviet so far, which I think is right.
  3. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 23 January 2018 13: 20 New
    +6
    Well, this is very pleasing, we have been waiting for news about the Boomerang for a long time. We wait!
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 23 January 2018 13: 33 New
    +4
    Pl photo shows that the military in uniform inside the car closely! Either the seats are not adjustable, or they are really too close to one row from another!
    1. woron333444
      woron333444 23 January 2018 14: 36 New
      +2
      This is not a Mercedes
    2. Genry
      Genry 23 January 2018 14: 57 New
      +2
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Either the seats are not adjustable, or they are really too close to one row from another!

      Yes, they could make ~ 30 cm wider. The internal space would be larger and go along with T-72.
    3. midivan
      midivan 23 January 2018 15: 22 New
      +2
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Pl photo shows that the military in uniform inside the car closely! Either the seats are not adjustable, or they are really too close to one row from another!

      Quote: Genry
      Yes, they could make ~ 30 cm wider. The internal space would be larger and go along with T-72.

      And if the seats are arranged according to the type of cylinders of the V-shaped engine, then you don’t have to rest on your knees and you don’t have to do it wider. request IMHA
  5. Radikal
    Radikal 23 January 2018 14: 58 New
    +1
    Quote: Per se.
    Quote: Angel_and_Demon
    with closed eyes you can get
    It's all about priorities, if you dwell on military columns that attack militants from ambushes in our rear, putting land mines, this is one thing, if a big war, this is another. We have taken the path of experience of local wars, anti-terrorist operations. Finally, making huge is simply physically easier than rationally compact. If you run into MRAP (mine resistant ambush protected - protected from undermining and attacks from ambushes, minostoykny zasadozashchishchennoy), then, of course, we have an armored troop-carrier for military columns, dwell on the landmine, but increase the height, making the target more vulnerable for PTR and armor-piercing shells. In the diagram, the usual truck and car with MRAP technology. What kind of war we are preparing for, if the “Syrian experience” also wants to be transferred to the snowy expanses, yes, under the deep rivers. So the show "tank biathlon", you see, will be the criterion for combat training.

    good hi
  6. Dedall
    Dedall 23 January 2018 21: 46 New
    +1
    On the BTR-60, it was possible to expand the seats and the rookery turned out to be a compartment, but what about this?
    And about the excessive height of the correct remark. This is due to the fact that in the southern edges of the SBZ traveled around platoon strongholds and conducted inspections and dressings inside the armored personnel carrier. And somehow I got into it and I hear a loud “broads” outside. And this turns out to be a “bassoon” of barmaleys who floundered on my “armor dressing”. Hit if it was taller.
  7. Dmitry Tantsyura
    Dmitry Tantsyura 24 January 2018 14: 21 New
    0
    s \ in the compartment and where? how's your temperature?