Everything! Aircraft carrier will not: electricity is over

62
Eh! Glorious times were! This is me saying that America was ready to wipe out the offender of its citizens into powder and even could not regret a “whole” aircraft carrier for such a good purpose. Such an Internet meme got its birth during the US grenada campaign against the sovereign island state of Grenada, which showed willfulness and wished to leave the sphere of state influence and even (!) Placed Cuban advisers on its territory without asking for permission from the feudal - from the USA.

Then, in 1983, outraged by the boorish and cynical attitude of the island's governor towards the population (in the best traditions of American democracy!), Who is living in poverty against the backdrop of “guber” booze with booze and prostitutes (ashotakova)! All pro-American governors adhere to such face control, otherwise you are not pro-American!) An American protege, the public of this island (and this is an island off the coast of Venezuela with a population of 110 thousand at that time) equipped a delicious pendal to the pro-American governor, kicked him out of power residence and graciously (on his own head) allowed him to "vegetate" in his own villa. The pendal received by the Grenadian governor resonated echoed in the heads of the US State Department, turned into a jingle and this jingle in their brain became a brilliant plan to free the languishing governor, a prominent representative of American civilization on a wild and uncivilized island! The plan was good, and it was further supported by a stronger plan - to escort for this mission a whole squadron of seven warships led by the Independence aircraft carrier, a squadron of five auxiliary ships led by the tank landing and helicopter-bearing Guam, carrying 9,5, XNUMX thousand of any "creature in a pair" ie - all sorts of marines, rangers and "seals", five tanks and 30 armored personnel carriers.



Everything! Aircraft carrier will not: electricity is over


The armada described above was opposed by: 200 people of Cuban workers invited to arrange a local airport (this is how the Grenadians are the main strike force and a threat to the American grouping) 400 quadruple DShK of the same production, 600 armored personnel carriers - 5 and 23 BRDM and 8 people - Cuban advisors. Still, unfortunately for the population of Grenada, on the island at that time were 8 American students from among those taking part in an annual internship on campuses. These very students were urgently required to release, according to American politicians. Apparently - from the very annual practice.

Describe the whole battle, which began with the traditional failure actions of American warriors, it makes no sense. Whoever wants it, he will google, find what he is looking for and enjoy the description of the usual mediocrity of the US strategists. It makes sense to voice the loss ratio

Losses USA:
19 killed, 116 injured.
8 helicopters were shot down.
4 UH-60
1 MH-6 Hughes (the only photo not confirmed)
1 CH-46
2 AH-1T (Cobra)
Damage received 3 aircraft and 6 helicopters

From a military point of view, the operation is careless, the losses are incredible and inconvenient.
This can only be justified by the fact that the admiral commanded, and he was not given two weeks to prepare.

American students ran up to 80 people a day, or rather, calmly flew two flights of one An-24. After two weeks there would be no one to save.

Loss of defenders of the island:
17 Grenada soldiers killed.

Alas, the losing side does not report either its heroism or losses. As for the stories of American sources about this “Epos”, the myth of the heroic “Cuban builders” actually looked like this:
“There were only 200 of them and they had nothing to shoot with - they didn’t fight. They surrounded their hostels with barbed wire, held 2 for weeks and sent to Cuba. And 17 Americans were treated by wounded Cubans on a Guam helicopter carrier and they also flew home. But 47 military advisers who fought with the Americans, took refuge in the USSR diplomatic mission and flew home with our diplomats. According to the contract of the parties. "

This is all, dear readers, a prelude and an illustration of what is happening today in the land of Syria near the city of Afrin, and one more confirmation that "Wolverine is no longer a cake." And the following happens, in my opinion:

The ill-fated Kurds, who believed the American stories about the fact that now they - the Yankees - their best friends, considered themselves the accomplished masters of a state that had not yet taken place, and on this ringing wave they began to do all kinds of obscenities, namely, they began to ignore the proposals of Al-Assad about the need for negotiations on the topic settlement of the Kurdish issue on the territory of Syria, rejected the proposal of the Russian command of the Russian Aerospace Forces grouping on the same topic, and also began to unceasingly promote the remnants of Islamist radicals in vostoyanii coalition Syria - Russian VKS - Iran - Hezbollah.

Surely, the United States, launching, arming and facilitating the seizure of vast territories of Syria by Kurdish formations, promised them with a blue eye that, “as soon as, then immediately,” ie. - as soon as Turkey starts fighting against the Kurds (and for Erdogan the Kurds near the Turkish border is an abscess that can only be removed surgically), the United States will not force the aircraft carrier at the head of the squadron to defend its best friends to the Syrian desert. Fortunately, Madame Jen Psaki at one time has already suggested how this can be done, threatening AUG of Belarus. For persuasiveness, they even delivered MANPADS to frighten the “evil Turk”.

Do not scare. Trouble ... Turkey has begun active hostilities against the Kurdish enclave and has been successfully annihilating the Kurds for several days already. And already from the part of the Kurds themselves and "of all progressive humanity," cries for the innocent victims and (obviously from a professional clue from Washington) that Russia is to blame for everything. And what are the best friends? They are silent. And, if it is sensible to judge, they have nothing to oppose to the coincidence of interests of the Syrian leadership and the Turkish. And this is not just a coincidence of interests, but also an active defense of one’s interests through force. And the most interesting thing is that the position of both Turkey and Syria is supported, publicly and privately, and coordinated with Russia. What happens - Russia managed to act on two fronts? Yes, and without significant costs. And in contrast to the doubts that the positions of Turkey and the Russian Federation are coordinated, indicate consultations between the General Staffs of both countries.

But for the Kurds, the situation - the seams. Slyly made by the inhabitants of the desert put the wrong horse. And for the states, the situation is not easy. In order to declare oneself as a full-fledged and weighty participant in the conflict, there are few options - either to watch because of the sand dune, or to go to an obvious provocation, which is fraught with an answer and you can cool it up along the ridge.

Here is such a geopolitical conflict, friends, suggests how to act in the case when our closest “nebrat”, supported and lowered by our eternal “partners” off the leash, will completely get rid of and dare to grin towards Russia. It will be necessary to act on the principle of the hero of the movie "The Diamond Hand" - "I will beat gently, but hard ...!"
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    24 January 2018 06: 04
    I think that ours should support Syria and let it deal with the Kurds itself.
    Threat and in general I am admired by the foreign policy of the shaved: they came, they simply plundered space wealth, then they kicked them out, but when they left they managed to spoil everything so much that they still haven't raked it.
    1. +1
      24 January 2018 06: 09
      Quote: K0
      foreign policy admires shaved

      Who are these scoundrels?
      1. +5
        24 January 2018 06: 32
        Quote: Romulus
        Who are these scoundrels?

        so the British)) I would call them naglosaksami of course, but this now applies more to amers)
        1. +3
          24 January 2018 09: 44
          So then maybe the Britons? And then shaved - these are bald people who subjected the scalp to mechanical stress, leading to the removal of this hair.
          1. +4
            24 January 2018 12: 05
            Quote: Mestny
            So then maybe the Britons? And then shaved - these are bald people who subjected the scalp to mechanical stress, leading to the removal of this hair.

            maybe you're right ... but I like the word "shaved" and the root of the word "brit" and a little shade from the phrase "shave the sheep")) they nevertheless were kicked out of these "feeders")))
            may need to write like this: shaved what
          2. +7
            25 January 2018 15: 54
            Quote: Mestny
            So then maybe the Britons?

            In Russian, the word "Britain" is written with one letter "t". This rule applies to all derived words from the word "Britain": British, British, Britons.
          3. +2
            29 January 2018 14: 47
            Quote: Mestny
            And then shaved - it's bald

            You are undoubtedly in the morning frantically looking for a floating comb somewhere. Shaved are not too lazy to shave. And bald ones are naturally lost hair. There was hair - and no. In whole or in part - it does not depend on efforts to work with a razor, but on the level of testosterone in the body. Here is the tail of a peacock, horns of all kinds of deer and elk But in a reasonable person - baldness. Well, I like this theory. And the fact of having a short neat hairstyle without worries.
    2. +7
      24 January 2018 07: 58
      There is no one to even compare with the British in vileness, everywhere, leaving the colonies, they laid time-bombed mines, which continue to fire up to now. Here and Afghanistan, and India with Pakistan and Bangladesh, and South Africa. Only in the countries of the Commonwealth, everything is quite calm, but here already in Britain itself the problems begin in the form of Scotland.
      1. +1
        26 January 2018 01: 55
        Quote: inkass_98
        There’s no one to compare with the British in vileness,

        when compared with their offspring by the Americans, then these for a much shorter period without using any "mines" killed millions of people !!! negative negative negative
        1. +2
          27 January 2018 12: 50
          Quote: Nikolai the Greek
          when compared with their offspring by the Americans, then these for a much shorter period without using any "mines" killed millions of people !!!

          This is a miserable parody - general, compared with the metropolis ...
          1. +2
            27 January 2018 16: 18
            I don’t know who the general store is, and who is the metropolis, but it is the Americans who have been ruining the country for decades !!!
            Quote: AllXVahhaB
            Quote: Nikolai the Greek
            when compared with their offspring by the Americans, then these for a much shorter period without using any "mines" killed millions of people !!!

            This is a miserable parody - general, compared with the metropolis ...

            I don’t know who the general store is, and who is the metropolis, but it is the Americans who have been ruining the country for decades !!!
            1. +2
              28 January 2018 16: 03
              Quote: Nikolai the Greek
              I don’t know who the general store is, and who is the metropolis, but it is the Americans who have been ruining the country for decades !!!

              For decades, they embody what has been laid down by the Metropolis for centuries! Almost all of today's tension points on the planet (Middle East, India \ Pakistan, Afghanistan, Africa, Indochina) are laid by the British. And the countries of the British Commonwealth rule even organizations such as WADA
    3. +1
      26 January 2018 01: 51
      Quote: K0
      I think that ours should support Syria and let it deal with the Kurds itself.
      Threat and in general I am admired by the foreign policy of the shaved: they came, they simply plundered space wealth, then they kicked them out, but when they left they managed to spoil everything so much that they still haven't raked it.

      judging by how events unfold over the past decades, they still arrange chaos, but robbing is no longer possible ... moreover, the consequences of chaos in recent times began to fly back to them !!! wassat wassat good good good
  2. +12
    24 January 2018 06: 10
    Apparently, my mother told the Kurds a little - do not get along with bad boys - you will get a lyuley!
    1. +9
      24 January 2018 07: 52
      I didn’t speak at all, apparently. In adolescence, he spoke quite a bit - a negative attitude.
      Maybe I got such people, but the impression is that he needs to deceive you.
    2. +3
      24 January 2018 07: 56
      Vladimir hi But in any way, the Kurds will blame Russia for all the troubles. A good calf in two mothers sucks? What for you need such an insatiable! To the slaughter!
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Apparently, my mother told the Kurds a little - do not get along with bad boys - you will get a lyuley!
      1. +6
        24 January 2018 08: 02
        Hello Dima ! hi Kurds are also different: Syrian, Iranian, Turkish. And the support is different. And the staff play the Kurdish card! And again, a mess in Syria. ISIS is not enough for us ...
      2. +2
        24 January 2018 09: 56
        Kurds will blame Russia for all troubles. A good calf in two mothers sucks

        210okv, in this regard, the thieves have a saying in the topic: if 2 nipples are inserted into the mouth, then two hours will also fit ... a.
    3. +2
      29 January 2018 14: 51
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      Little apparently mom told the Kurds

      Apparently their dad said: "We don’t need bullies, we ourselves are bullies!"
  3. +6
    24 January 2018 06: 24
    What was it? AND? Personally, I did not understand .... request
    1. +10
      24 January 2018 07: 36
      A small digression into the history of the transition to Syria and Ukraine. I myself did not understand why the author was wasting time. Probably to say:
      "I will beat accurately, but hard ...!"
  4. +10
    24 January 2018 07: 16
    A long time ago the moderator "Esaul" on the site did not appear! hi And for the article +, and thanks! hi
  5. +3
    24 January 2018 07: 46
    Article plus ... a very intelligible presentation of the state of affairs in Syria ... From myself ... It seems that ours have begun to play ahead of the curve ... And most importantly, effectively ...
    1. +7
      24 January 2018 08: 58
      Yes, here rather we are not even the initiators. It seems more like that just "we" having seen how the "baby" beats in hysterics on the floor of the store "just left." lol And then the "child" realized that "he was left alone with the harsh World" and that it was much worse - Russia wasn’t for him Mom tongue It’s time for the “baby” to grow up and understand that “it’s time to go home”, it is too early for them to even think about “their house”.
      And an attempt to take advantage of the fact that the “house is on fire” and try to squeeze something out for yourself, well, here's the harsh truth of life.
      And the phrase "Russia has betrayed us" must be sent "to the crypto, the cosine," we there did not promise either statehood or independence. Advise EVERYONE to realize that Russia is not there for “gifts” to anyone, for - to destroy the terrorists !! good To all the rest, we propose "to sit still and not to bounce." Here Kurds see jumped.
      1. +1
        24 January 2018 09: 20
        It’s impossible just for the phrase Russia betrayed us to turn pisyun especially towards a strategic partner. Kurds for the Russian Federation for the future are more important than Turkey. And you can not push the Kurds into the arms of the United States. Ideally, it is necessary for the Russian Federation to shout at them at the very finish of the military plans of the Turks and besiege them, so that in the eyes of the Kurds of the Russian Federation it would be a savior.
        1. +6
          24 January 2018 10: 19
          Stop on behalf of us all to assign important or "unnecessary." That’s for me personally, as people, that the Turks are the Kurds — the same nevermind. I’m only opposing someone’s aircraft bombing women and children of others, which would throw the same women and children in the basements hiding from the bombing. negative
          And which is much more important - the Kurds want too much, the example of the Bulgarians, if they are “simple Kurds” so good, and those who come to power they want to clog under the Americans and lick their asshole - this is the problem of the Kurds and let them solve it themselves.
          1. +1
            24 January 2018 15: 22
            Well for starters
            Quote: Mih1974
            Stop on behalf of us all to assign important or "unnecessary."

            I expressed my personal opinion and I really believe that not all people are equal. And nations are not all equal among themselves. And who believes that everyone is equal to each other, he simply lives in an illusory world.
            And I also do not care how many non-Russian citizens should die any death in order to improve the living conditions of Russian citizens, well, or at least so that the citizens of the Russian Federation were just in a good mood. And it is a pity to someone who is not a citizen of the Russian Federation outside the Russian Federation who can personally plan to go to provide all possible assistance, he can transfer it from the already small income even through charitable foundations, even though he personally came to give it out to the poor and destitute.
            And about
            Quote: Mih1974
            if they are “simple Kurds” so good, and those who want to clog under the Americans and lick their asses come to power, this is the problem of the Kurds

            I can say that it is precisely this problem that needs to be solved, not giggle over, "The Amers have bombed! Americans shamed the Middle East!" since the picture is not so rosy and, in general, the Americans do not quarrel with the Turks acquire an ally in the form of Kurds. So are all Americans prosrali ?!
          2. +2
            29 January 2018 15: 05
            Quote: Mih1974
            I’m only against someone’s aircraft bombing women and children of others,

            And let them cut with knives? Here an article earlier this morning was about the exploits of the Kurds in the war of 1878 (Massacre at Bayazet), in 1915 (the massacre of the Orthodox or Armenian genocide in modern terms. Greeks, Assyrians and others are vanishingly small compared with Armenians). Nikita the miracle worker (?) Needed allies against the US. So Bashibuzuki became allies for the USSR. Maybe they promised something on behalf of the USSR. So the leadership of the capitalist RF must indignantly open itself from such a totalitarian legacy.
        2. +4
          24 January 2018 13: 18
          Kurds for the Russian Federation for the future are more important than Turkey.
          In terms of a gang of guys trying to break the four states, is it more important than partnership with a very strong regional power? And on what subject do we have the “favor” of the Kurds, for the sake of which we will have to lower Erdogan? Do we need our own gangs, following the example of the USA? Do you know how much they cost, and how effective are they? Or just want, according to the example of American "partners" to write off a billion or two to their support?
          1. 0
            24 January 2018 15: 13
            Maybe the example of the United States ... maybe the ancient USA, examples in history can be found ... but that's not the point. Strategically, Turkey and the United States are friends among themselves, and friends against the Russian Federation and friends, for a long time and no whims of Erdogan will not spoil a long friendship. Turkey for the United States is no less important than the United States for the Turks. Erdogan is not eternal, and the strategic interests of states guarantee their long friendship. Kurds with their wishes for their statehood are just a wonderful gang that can be used and by the way this gang has a back door to countries where they live compactly ...
            1. +2
              24 January 2018 17: 22
              Suddenly, the strategic interest for Turkey is the preservation of its territorial integrity. From this point of view, from the point of view of simply preserving the state, your posts look very interesting. That is, the Turks will be strategically friends with those who are trying to destroy their country? I would ask if you are in your mind, because your statements are not just illogical, they are carried by the clinic from them, but I suspect that your mind is in order. Which begets the next question. Why are you stubbornly carrying this game?
  6. +1
    24 January 2018 08: 38
    These gallant appeals from the series “Let's punish the arrogant Kurds surprise me! It’s profitable for Russia, the Kurds do not like Assad, the Kurds love the United States, let's help Erdogan and beat the Kurds.” In general, at this stage, the Kurds just messed up the shores and are trying to get out of the control of the Russian Federation, but it is not worth splitting the Kurds and even calling them names because the Kurds are a strategic partner for the future, and Turkey is a country from NATO. Who will remember in five years what Assad was? Yes, and Erdogan in five years will go down in history. And with them their ambitions will go away. And the whole Kurdish people will remain even if they now flee from the Turks from Syria. By the way, who, instead of the Kurds, will live in the liberated territory? Then the Kurds will return to their battered houses. What will the representatives of the Russian Federation look like when dealing with Kurds after Erdogan’s departure? Here the Turks will look quite good, they will have a border problem solved and they will be friends Assad the problem of Kurdish autonomy will be solved, friends with the United States because Turkey will not be allowed to leave Turkey from NATO they will have control of Basfor they have the second most powerful fleet in NATO and much more, But the Turks will throw the Russian Federation out of habit, the Russian Federation has only Turkish investments in Turkey, which can be nationalized, probably technologies transferred to Turkey via s400. Kurds have a flaw in the form of ambition to create their own state and the lack of free territory for such a state, but living compactly in several countries of the Middle East, Kurds with skillful puppeteers can be the force that can be the key to successful destabilization of the region. So soon I think we will witness how Moscow will be a peacemaker between the Kurds Erdogan and Assad who issued autonomy within Syria. By the way, Kurds can be the key to expelling the United States from Iraq.
    1. +2
      24 January 2018 10: 04
      It’s strange. But it was precisely the United States that the Kurds chose as their “mother." And they hoped that the Russian Federation would continue to protect their fragmented people after refusing to recognize the power of the President of Syria in Syria. Bad logic among Kurdish leaders.
      1. 0
        24 January 2018 14: 27
        Back in August, the “mother” of the Afrikan Kurds was not at all American:
  7. 0
    24 January 2018 08: 59
    The Yankees have atas with planning at all! If they still have tactics in place here and there, then some imbeciles are involved in the strategy. As we did in the first Chechen. But if we got better, then the worse the worse.
  8. +4
    24 January 2018 09: 11
    Well, by the way, if we talk about the fact that the United States has completely adjusted with the Kurds, then this is not so at all. The Kurds will receive wide autonomy from Assad, will remain friends with the United States because today they receive money from the United States and in the minds of Kurdish people it is the United States that acts as the main assistants in promoting Kurdish independence and the Kurds will receive autonomy in the eyes of the Kurds sold to them by the United States. Time will pass, Erdogan will leave, and Turkey will remain a NATO ally in the USA. Therefore, reasoning about the fact that the United States really stands up for the Kurds can be fiction. In general, with all its unbalanced foreign policy, the United States is not so bad as the pro-Russian media are trying to present us. Globally, the US in the Middle East did not lose anything special, but in general they manage to level the construction of the Kremlin in the Middle East. They manage to push a fly in the ointment in each barrel of honey.
    1. 0
      24 January 2018 12: 56
      I do not quite agree, but plus yours.
    2. 0
      24 January 2018 13: 57
      A little more time will pass, and the next financial crisis will begin to take shape in the USA. NATO will fall apart, and will no longer be controlled by the United States. Old unions will collapse and new ones will appear. And then we’ll count the "chickens."
      1. 0
        24 January 2018 15: 41
        Well, again, twenty-five ... Again, talk about the crisis in the United States ... about the crisis of the world order ... etc. it’s like talking about good, which all conquers evil, but can’t win ... In the foreseeable future, even if we say that the crisis will come in the USA, only China can provoke it, but it is no less dependent on the USA than they are on it ... so that in a crisis, the United States will not be impoverished. Talk about disagreement in NATO is generally from the category of fantasy ... In NATO, everything is smeared with bucks and the Amer fleet, in fact, the rest of NATO members are only a ground bridgehead for the US army, but the problem is that not all members are equal in NATO .. Some people really get protection, and some if they sacrifice it, and it is the victims who shout the threat loudest than all, and those who receive imaginary protection want to have a buffer zone for filtering threats ... so that everything is balanced and generally balanced.
  9. +2
    24 January 2018 09: 27
    Justifying the invasion of the Turkish army and their own corruption, the Russian authorities come up with such articles. And if someone started bombing the territory of Russia in Chechnya in the 90s, would they also be delighted that the Chechens didn’t put them on those?
    1. +1
      24 January 2018 12: 53
      Do not confuse ... with a finger. You are comparing two completely different situations.
  10. BAI
    +1
    24 January 2018 09: 47
    Grenada is a momentous moment. This is the end of the Vietnam Syndrome and the beginning of the road to Syria. From Grenada to Syria, almost all US military endeavors were successful: Panama, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya. To some extent, Afghanistan, etc. Even if they got pierced somewhere, we must pay tribute to their propaganda, we made a model of the heroism of the US military from this. I write to Syria - not to include Syria - there the USA suffered a crushing, shameful victory.
    1. 0
      26 January 2018 08: 47
      Somewhat wrong, colleague. Ever since Korea, all US military adventures are clearly flawed! In any case, the planned result has not been achieved, and the consequences are still audible!
  11. +1
    24 January 2018 10: 15
    Well, for now, all the reports say that the Turks didn’t think enough - their Kurds will coddle in full! Bashar does not order them to bomb from the air - there is nothing to fly in a strange sky. In general, they were stuck there for a long time, which is very bad, because gives time and opportunity to amerovyrodokov come up with another vileness and bring it to life.
  12. +1
    24 January 2018 12: 51
    Let the Turks bring them to the maximum land level. To start. And then a little more, this is so that the Kurds understand that the Yankees can’t get along for them, and there are only two alternatives — to live with Assad with possible autonomy or be blown up by the Turks. Something like this.
  13. +5
    24 January 2018 13: 22
    For me, the situation with the Kurds and Turks is beneficial for Russia in terms of showing what happens when the movements are inconsistent with Russia. The Turks no longer disdain to coordinate their actions with us, you see, and the Kurds will be taught.

    Py Sy

    I would not admire and idealize neither the Turks, nor the Kurds, nor the Syrians. The local (Middle Eastern) people are rotten in nature. Therefore, in their family showdowns, let them mutate each other themselves.
  14. +1
    24 January 2018 14: 50
    Quote: Kent0001
    Let the Turks bring them to the maximum land level. To start. And then a little more, this is so that the Kurds understand that the Yankees can’t get along for them, and there are only two alternatives — to live with Assad with possible autonomy or be blown up by the Turks. Something like this.

    How lovely! Now the Turks are rolling in the soil of the Kurds in Afrin and everything, like, will get better. And the fact that the FSA is ahead of the Turks is not considered, like. Kurds sat quite loyal to Assad in Afrin, we had a mission there, our military police and equipment were constantly stationed in Afrin, and now, if the Turks win, all of Afrin will be under rebels from the Free Syrian Army, who have been fighting for a minute since 2013 Assad. Well, tell me, where is the profit for Syria angry? )))
  15. 0
    24 January 2018 15: 20
    In this situation, we need to kill different terrorists and free and not free oppositionists there. Stripping to zero. So that when stripping on the left bank of the Euphrates, no one would hit in the back.
  16. 0
    24 January 2018 17: 16
    Until the pro-American Kurds create their autonomy in Syria, the US has no reason to customize the aircraft carrier.
    1. 0
      25 January 2018 10: 34
      Literally about this and that .... there will be no aircraft carrier ... for there will be no autonomy ... if Russia would have been approached .... and so ... not ... will not
  17. +1
    24 January 2018 19: 24
    There’s a sect of “aircraft carrier witnesses” in the country ... It’s a certain fetish! Nobody can explain intelligibly what he will give and how the truth will help, but nada.
  18. 0
    25 January 2018 10: 30
    "Turkey bombing Manbij, where the US special forces are stationed"
    If this is true, then maybe this is pure malice, but damn soul rejoices ... It seems that soon we will have to deal with a radical rearmament of Turkey ...
  19. 0
    25 January 2018 12: 06
    The fact that our sworn friends stsuki is clear, but the fact that they will be constantly ... liquid is as clear as a clear day, and they will do it with the wrong hands, languages ​​and people. Someone else's loss is just democracy.
  20. 0
    25 January 2018 19: 03
    bullshit...
  21. 0
    25 January 2018 23: 05
    Civilization of speakers. No one thought about them. Syria is the old name of Assyria. Leader Bashar Assad. In the territory of Syria ASSAsins live. In the Chuvash language there is a word ARschin similar to ASSAsin, where Sin is more precisely chin in the meaning of "man." Translated man Asses. ASSAsins are special forces of the ancient world.
    Well, the northern Palmyra-St. Petersburg. I will not comment further. If anyone is interested in whatsapp vibe 89061316623.
  22. 0
    26 January 2018 01: 40
    Why did the Kurds sniff with the Americans? Someone from the Kurdish leaders sold out to the Americans?
    1. 0
      26 January 2018 17: 38
      Previously, the Anglo-Saxons were betrayed by the “blacks,” their Russians split ... in general, to prevent what they could neither physically nor mentally because they had raised upright ubl-kov. Now they decided to put on the Kurds, as if on the victims, like they have a moral right to help, and the Russians seem to not bomb the Kurds ... but they forgot about the Turks, who simply will bomb them, because the Turks have been waging a permanent sluggish war with the Kurds for decades, without looking back at the usa. And the Kurds, by their ambitions, drove themselves into a corner, choosing war between shame and disgrace, and in the end received shame in the form of a scammer from the United States.
  23. 0
    26 January 2018 15: 49
    Quote: rotmistr60
    A small digression into the history of the transition to Syria and Ukraine. I myself did not understand why the author was wasting time. Probably to say:
    "I will beat accurately, but hard ...!"

    Yesaul proposes to solve the Ukrainian issue with the help of the Turks :)
  24. -1
    27 January 2018 14: 03
    Quote: inkass_98
    There is no one to even compare with the British in vileness, everywhere, leaving the colonies, they laid time-bombed mines, which continue to fire up to now.

    But ours, leaving all places from where they were not asked to leave, remained eternal debtors. Yes, and forced to repent ...
  25. 0
    27 January 2018 20: 14
    It would not be Israel would be calm in the region. Maintaining constant tension is the main task of the Zionists. From them all troubles.
  26. 0
    29 January 2018 16: 52
    damn it, but the Kurds successfully fought against the barmaley !!! Yes, I saw that they are curled up !!! amers have it amazingly turns out it is necessary to give credit to the world still believes and is leading them
  27. 0
    30 January 2018 11: 17
    Some kind of crazy article. At least in terms of style ... "Kankretny" the boy invented, not otherwise

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"