Military Review

More than 10 thousand military personnel of the Central Military District worked out the "Syrian" combat experience at the training grounds

45
Press Service of the Central Military District reports that at the Central Military District grounds, servicemen began to master the Syrian experience in countering large armed formations. It is reported that the development of the experience gained by the district command in the SAR, attracted more than 10 thousand soldiers at the Volga and Ural military training grounds.


The main events were held at the Totsky proving ground near Orenburg. It is reported that the units tested new methods of warfare.

From the press service:
According to the plan, the troops had to destroy a large conditional illegal armed formation without direct contact with the enemy. For this purpose, reconnaissance-shock circuits were used, which are a bundle of reconnaissance assets and fire defeat units that are interfaced through automated control systems. The coordinates of the reconnoitered targets and data for adjusting the fire were received from unmanned aerial vehicles and ground reconnaissance equipment to the gunners and navigators in digital form via radio channels in a matter of seconds. This allowed real-time monitoring of the effectiveness of the raids and their adjustment.


More than 10 thousand military personnel of the Central Military District worked out the "Syrian" combat experience at the training grounds


It is reported that the commanders of formations and military units of the 2 combined arms army observed new methods of warfare.
Photos used:
function.mil.ru
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii 20 January 2018 07: 06 New
    +7
    That's right, you need to minimize the time from the moment of detection to the moment of destruction of the enemy.
    1. vladimirZ
      vladimirZ 20 January 2018 08: 07 New
      +4
      According to the plan, the troops had to destroy a large conventional illegal armed formation without direct contact with the enemy - from the article

      And how long will we teach the Army to fight terrorists and "illegal groups"? That Russia has no potential adversaries in the form of a NATO alliance led by the United States, or aspiring to the islands of Japan, the potential threat of a billion-dollar China?
      Okay, in 2008, Serdyukov had already structurally formed the Army to fight only terrorism, but after all time passed, they saw that they had made criminal treacherous miscalculations, and began to return at a slow pace to the Army, which was able to withstand a serious military threat.
      And here again "According to the plan, the troops needed to destroy a large conventional illegal armed formation"Who are they going to confront? Again terrorists?
      1. tchoni
        tchoni 20 January 2018 08: 24 New
        +2
        Quote: vladimirZ
        And how long will we teach the Army to fight terrorists and "illegal groups"?

        Until these very formations cease to be a real threat.
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 20 January 2018 08: 27 New
          +6
          Haha They made fun. For the fight against terrorists inside Russia there is the National Guard, in number, exceeding the number of the Army proper.
          Did not know?
          The army exists to repel external aggression. The basics of military science.
          1. KCA
            KCA 20 January 2018 08: 37 New
            0
            It is precisely what the Rosguard exists, gathered completely different units and sculpting them as a whole, until the actual formation of combat-ready service is still very far away, as, for example, a paper scraper from the licensing system, which the weapon held in its hands only when viewed during registration, will struggle with terrorism?
            1. vladimirZ
              vladimirZ 20 January 2018 08: 41 New
              +3
              Exactly what the Rosguard exists, they have assembled completely different units and sculpt them into a single whole, - KCA

              For your information, the National Guard includes all internal troops designed to fight the internal enemy, including terrorists. Internal troops have always been, so they should conduct similar exercises.
              1. Vladimir16
                Vladimir16 20 January 2018 12: 44 New
                +2
                Photo is not the topic. From the word at all. Soldiers walk through a snowy field ...
                Quote: vladimirZ
                Who are they going to confront? Again the terrorists?

                It is the terrorists. Hitler with a pile of kodla was a terrorist - villages with civilians were burned. Now such acts are defined as terror.
                The United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese, napalm burned the Vietnamese and Koreans. It is also terror.
                NATO bombed Yugoslavia - this is terror.
                Ukraine shoots at peaceful cities - terror.
                Terror is a method of warfare by the west. It was the Western people who taught the Islamists to fight like this.

                So what are true teachings. And the enemy is determined correctly.
                1. vladimirZ
                  vladimirZ 20 January 2018 15: 18 New
                  +2
                  So what are true teachings. And the enemy is determined correctly - Vladimir16

                  Haha Well, if you use the methods of fighting terrorists in Syria to fight in a big war with the "terrorists" of NATO, the USA, China, which needs a full-blooded Army in the structure of the times of the USSR with modern technology, Russia can predict a defeat.
                  Do not play with words. Each definition in politics and war has a specific meaning. If you interfere with the concepts of “terrorists” with the concepts of “probable military adversary” in your studies, in combat documents and plans, this will not lead to good.
                  So we are already confused with the use of the concept of "partners", then we encounter them almost in combat contact at sea, in the air, in Syria, otherwise we send gold and foreign exchange reserves to US and NATO banks.
          2. tchoni
            tchoni 20 January 2018 21: 56 New
            0
            Quote: vladimirZ
            Haha They made fun. For the fight against terrorists inside Russia there is the National Guard, in number, exceeding the number of the Army proper.
            Did not know?
            The army exists to repel external aggression. The basics of military science.

            Oh, mom is my woman. Another professor was found at the academy of the general staff of the divan troops. Rosgchardia was directly conquered in Syria, and before that, the Vshniki glorified themselves in Afghanistan?
          3. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 21 January 2018 02: 05 New
            0
            The number of the Armed Forces is more than a million military personnel and about 900 thousand civilian personnel. In the National Guard, the total number of military personnel, employees (that is, police) and civilian personnel in the region of 340 thousand. NG military personnel is 170 thousand. That is, NG military personnel are more than five times less than the Armed Forces.
      2. Rusland
        Rusland 20 January 2018 08: 25 New
        +8
        These terrorists are being prepared and armed by NATO and other Middle Eastern henchmen, all of whom we love.
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 20 January 2018 08: 35 New
          +2
          These terrorists are prepared and armed by NATO and other Middle Eastern henchmen, - Rusland

          And what of it? The fight against terrorism is a function of the National Guard, the internal troops of the state.
          If you switch the Army to the functions of internal troops, who will fulfill the tasks of the Army to protect the state from an external enemy - NATO, the United States, and potential billionth of China?
          And why then such a big National Guard? Is it easy to fight with people going to peaceful rallies?
          1. tchoni
            tchoni 20 January 2018 21: 57 New
            +1
            Quote: vladimirZ
            And why then such a big National Guard? Is it easy to fight with people going to peaceful rallies?

            That's it for this.
      3. Mar.Tirah
        Mar.Tirah 20 January 2018 08: 46 New
        0
        It’s not about the conditional name of the exercises. It is about working out the tactics of modern high-tech combat. Again, I think that our leadership does not want to bother our vulnerable neighbors and the “partner” overseas, another name for the exercises.
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 20 January 2018 08: 59 New
          0
          Watch the video of Lieutenant General Sobolev V.I. about the transformation of our Army from a powerful force capable of resisting any aggressor into an Army capable of only fighting terrorists.
          I can’t enter, so check out the link Very useful, especially for those who are not on the military topic.
          [media = https: //ok.ru/video/482583777736]
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. vladimirZ
            vladimirZ 20 January 2018 16: 06 New
            0
            Listen to the video of General Sobolev V.I. on this topic.
      4. Vard
        Vard 20 January 2018 09: 58 New
        +1
        The question is ... where can it come from ... Again, a column will pass through the floor of Russia ... And were the release of the captured maternity hospital included in the list of tasks ...
      5. My doctor
        My doctor 20 January 2018 12: 41 New
        0
        Quote: vladimirZ
        And how long will we teach the Army to fight terrorists and "illegal groups"? That Russia has no potential adversaries in the form of a NATO alliance led by the United States, or aspiring to the islands of Japan, the potential threat of a billion-dollar China?

        The problem is when the war begins with NATO or China, then gangs are guaranteed to appear. I think that 2-5 percent of fellow citizens will, if not directly support the aggressor for political or separatist reasons, then engage in robbery.
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 20 January 2018 15: 58 New
          +1
          I think that 2-5 percent of fellow citizens will, if not directly support the aggressor for political or separatist reasons, then engage in robbery - My Doctor

          It is for such purposes that the NKVD troops — internal troops — are needed. And the army is fighting with the army of the enemy aggressor.
          All of your young generation was mixed in the head by the Serdyukovs.
      6. Falcond
        Falcond 20 January 2018 13: 06 New
        0
        To opponents like NATO, the Russian army has been learning to resist since the age of 45, if you don’t know ... until now everything has been going on in manuals and combat manuals since those years ... but how to resist jihad mobiles and drones with explosives - it is not written there ... but such challenges are thrown ...
        In addition, the same NATO and the USA do not fight with us with their own hands, the experience in Syria shows this clearly ... therefore you, I think, have outdated views!
      7. Sands Careers General
        Sands Careers General 20 January 2018 15: 04 New
        0
        That Russia has no potential adversaries in the form of a NATO alliance led by the United States, or aspiring to the islands of Japan, the potential threat of a billion-dollar China?


        I do not understand, are you calling for war? And who will fight? You? I doubt it. Those who call for war usually squeal as far as possible from the fighting. I saw hundreds of such slugs.
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 20 January 2018 15: 54 New
          +1
          I do not understand, are you calling for war? - General of Sand Quarries

          Are you in mind Talking about a potential military threat has never been a "call to war."
          We were taught in the Soviet Army, that one is respected and not attacked by anyone with a strong trained Army, and we did everything to make it that way. Then the probable opponents were not called "partners", but constantly talked and wrote about their readiness to meet the troops of the potential enemy fully equipped.
          And slugs and traitors who have "partners" in the camp of a probable enemy appeared already in your time.
          1. Sands Careers General
            Sands Careers General 20 January 2018 16: 09 New
            0
            Where is the answer to my questions? I repeat once again - who will fight? You?
      8. MOSKVITYANIN
        MOSKVITYANIN 20 January 2018 18: 21 New
        0
        vladimirZ committed criminal treacherous miscalculations

        Which ones?
        to an Army capable of withstanding a serious military threat

        Outline this Army in order to know what you should strive for and at the same time voice what you think:
        serious military threat
        1. vladimirZ
          vladimirZ 20 January 2018 19: 02 New
          0
          Outline this Army in order to know what you should strive for and at the same time voice what you think: a serious military threat - MOSKVITYANIN

          Watch the above video of Lieutenant General Sobolev V.I. everything is laid out on shelves there.
          1. MOSKVITYANIN
            MOSKVITYANIN 20 January 2018 19: 42 New
            0
            Quote: vladimirZ
            Watch the above video of Lieutenant General Sobolev V.I. everything is laid out on shelves there.

            I looked at a balabol, such "boots" thrown out of the Army on YouTube by the sea ... such are even worse than Navalny, a conversation about anything, such as "pr ..... whether they are sawn and it's time to bring down" ....
            He is a member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (respectively, political agitation video), so I already said that until Vova is reelected, there will be a sea of ​​such experts in VO ...
            1. vladimirZ
              vladimirZ 21 January 2018 06: 43 New
              0
              I looked at a balabol, such "boots" thrown out of the Army on YouTube by the sea ... such are even worse than Navalny - MOSKVITYANIN

              Yes, you are probably an expert with a higher education from the Academy of the General Staff, and in the rank of a real higher lieutenant general Sobolev V.I. Where to you some lieutenant general with many years of military experience ?! laughing laughing laughing
              1. MOSKVITYANIN
                MOSKVITYANIN 21 January 2018 12: 13 New
                0
                vladimirZ you are probably an expert with a higher education from the General Staff Academy

                There’s not just a master’s .... but not the General Staff Academy ... laughing
                to the rank of present taller lieutenant general

                Not at all. The site is still starley fellow to gene. l-that will not get banned because of people like you, gee .... belay
                1. vladimirZ
                  vladimirZ 21 January 2018 19: 23 New
                  0
                  No, just a master ....
                  Not at all. The site is still starring fellow to the gene. l won't get banned because of people like you, gee .... - MOSKVITYANIN

                  Judging by the upbringing, and the manner of sticking to strangers, you will remain in the masters.
                  Where can you get to the real General Sobolev V.I., and you can’t get to the site site sofa "general" with his megalomania and great conceit.
  2. Pax tecum
    Pax tecum 20 January 2018 07: 10 New
    0
    Network-centric management system?
    Bravo!
    1. MOSKVITYANIN
      MOSKVITYANIN 20 January 2018 18: 23 New
      0
      Quote: Pax tecum
      Network-centric management system?

      Learned a new word. Even the empiricists put different concepts into this phrase ...
  3. Tusv
    Tusv 20 January 2018 07: 29 New
    +2
    Keep it up. The Americans have long insisted on war and say that it is inevitable. In general, for American transgender people, we are a bone in the throat of a bright elf. And we have a long-standing question. Tu bir, about the music that bir (I prefer Krušovice).
    Go through the woods, if possible, do not come to war, so We will not come, and if war is inevitable, then dig bunkers on Saturn - it is safer there
  4. Freeman
    Freeman 20 January 2018 07: 36 New
    +1
    Something the author of all the pictures on the site, the most unsuccessful "grabbed".
    This one is more suitable.
  5. Herculesic
    Herculesic 20 January 2018 07: 37 New
    +1
    Yeah, it’s great that we have drawn conclusions from the experience of the war in Syria, and we use the results to prepare the troops! good
  6. Simon
    Simon 20 January 2018 07: 54 New
    +1
    The gained combat experience in Syria will go into combat textbooks for training our troops. It is better to gain experience far from Russia than in Russia. The experience of World War II! Which was very hard and expensive for us. yes
  7. tchoni
    tchoni 20 January 2018 08: 28 New
    0
    It cannot but rejoice that the topic of RECOGNITION-IMPACT COMPLEXES (HANDS), the necessity of which was spoken of since the first Chichen, is finally finding its practical embodiment!
  8. Monarchist
    Monarchist 20 January 2018 08: 39 New
    0
    Quote: tchoni
    Quote: vladimirZ
    And how long will we teach the Army to fight terrorists and "illegal groups"?

    Until these very formations cease to be a real threat.

    And this is not soon
  9. dojjdik
    dojjdik 20 January 2018 08: 40 New
    0
    the best training ground for the "Syrian" combat experience is the Israeli border - if we do not understand the war in Syria immediately but gradually bring it to naught; if we don’t understand, the same “Afghanistan” is waiting for us and Lebanon
  10. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 20 January 2018 09: 24 New
    +2
    The main events were held at the Totsky training ground near Orenburg.

    Necessary exercises, near the border with Kazakhstan .. There are few hopes for Kazakhs, the US is actively interested in them.
    Nazarbayev flew to bow to Trump .. One Allah knows what they agreed on there, but I smell about Russia ..
  11. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 20 January 2018 13: 17 New
    +1
    Any properly organized exercise is useful. What is true, the "development of the Syrian experience of warfare" in the desert, semi-desert and foothill climatic zones in the interpolation on the snow of Orenburg (there today -13 in C) does not look very convincing. Especially since, as I recall, the Russian contingent of the military in the open field did not have to fight with "large armed formations". This is indicated by the minimal (praise to the Almighty!) Loss of personnel of the Russian army and the Emergency Situations.
    1. MOSKVITYANIN
      MOSKVITYANIN 20 January 2018 18: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: A. Privalov
      Any properly organized exercise is useful. What is true, the "development of the Syrian experience of warfare" in the desert, semi-desert and foothill climatic zones in the interpolation on the snow of Orenburg (there today -13 in C) does not look very convincing.

      What is the difference between the snow steppe and the desert?
      as I recall, the Russian contingent of military in the open field did not have to fight with "large armed formations".

      Your memory is girlish, but what about the 16 special forces of the RF MTR surrounded by militants 300? Or a defensive battle platoon of the VP of the Russian Federation and the units of the armed forces of the SAR with the militants of ISIS?

      I never trusted Israeli Jews ... you will not hear anything, only shit ....
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 20 January 2018 20: 15 New
        0
        Quote: MOSKVITYANIN
        Quote: A. Privalov
        Any properly organized exercise is useful. What is true, the "development of the Syrian experience of warfare" in the desert, semi-desert and foothill climatic zones in the interpolation on the snow of Orenburg (there today -13 in C) does not look very convincing.

        What is the difference between the snow steppe and the desert?
        as I recall, the Russian contingent of military in the open field did not have to fight with "large armed formations".

        Your memory is girlish, but what about the 16 special forces of the RF MTR surrounded by militants 300? Or a defensive battle platoon of the VP of the Russian Federation and the units of the armed forces of the SAR with the militants of ISIS?

        I never trusted Israeli Jews ... you will not hear anything, only shit ....

        Oh, MOSKVITYANIN, are we already "on you"? How nice of you!
        If you do not see the difference between the snow-covered steppe and the Syrian desert, I can’t do anything, I am powerless.
        The only thing that you simply have to tell you is: about 16 anonymous special forces, abandoned by the Syrians to the mercy of fate, who were first fired at the Grad installations, mortars, artillery, tanks, and on which was a shahid mobile and a bulldozer lined with three or four layers of steel sheets between which sand is poured, "and then, 300 trained terrorists -" Imported uniforms, go-pro cameras on their heads, medicine is very expensive. There were also black mercenaries. And weapons, in addition to Soviet and Chinese, were American and Israeli , I have heard. However, over the years, my ears have acquired such extraordinary flexibility that the noodles from them just slide off.
        I don’t know what kind of “Defensive battle of the platoon of the Russian Armed Forces and units of the SAR Armed Forces with ISIL militants” you mean, but the experience of conducting it for the “10 thousand troops on the Volga and Ural military training grounds” is clearly not enough.
        Have a nice one you too. hi
        1. MOSKVITYANIN
          MOSKVITYANIN 20 January 2018 21: 15 New
          0
          I understand you dear (?), Only useful information from you, “0”, stay “military Ikspert and ANALitik” on another site do not litter the air and do not fool the good-natured and gullible members of the forum ...
          1. A. Privalov
            A. Privalov 20 January 2018 23: 06 New
            0
            If, in addition to insults to the “good-natured and trustful members of the forum”, there is nothing more to say about the topic of the article, then I don’t dare to delay it anymore. hi
            1. MOSKVITYANIN
              MOSKVITYANIN 21 January 2018 00: 08 New
              0
              Any properly organized exercise is useful. What is true, the "development of the Syrian experience of warfare" in the desert, semi-desert and foothill climatic zones in the interpolation on the snow of Orenburg (there today -13 in C) does not look very convincing.

              This is on the topic of the article, such Jewish humor? Nobody has been holding you back for a long time, why, you know, except for the Palestinians nobody needs you ... (this does not apply to Russian Jews) ....
    2. Stiletto_711
      Stiletto_711 21 January 2018 02: 12 New
      0
      Keep watching! yes