Results of the week. Russian threat: now under water
The terrible events in the Perm school didn’t really excite Russian society. Usually similar news we are used to getting from the United States, where schoolchildren are attacking their teachers and fellow practitioners very often. But now our country is faced with a similar problem.
Permissiveness, lack of purpose in life, with the exception of “living in a high”, complete disregard for rules and regulations, not to mention respect for whoever you are, stupid, tries to teach and educate something for the cashier of a chain store. This is what we all received. Elimination of educational institutions, including pedagogical universities in the regions of the country. This is also what we all got. But our education has praise, for example, from the British educational specialists - they say you are on the right path, “tova.Schi” ... Well, well ... Who else wants to praise us? - In queue!..
Comments from our readers:
Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
Bulrumeb
And in general they made it out of school that it is not clear that the attendants, who have no rights, have only certain duties.
NordUral
Zzdimk
Is it really necessary? ..
The Russian Defense Ministry and the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) have agreed that the construction of Russian helicopter carriers will begin in 2020 year. Construction of new ships for the Russian Navy will be carried out in St. Petersburg at the shipyard "Severnaya Verf".
The whole question is that military experts have not yet decided how expedient it is to purchase helicopter carriers for the needs of the Russian Armed Forces. Moreover, the "misunderstandings" with this very expediency, if I may say so, drag on from the time of the agreements on the French Mistrals. The contract with the French still cannot really explain the Ministry of Defense, and in general the impression was that as soon as the French declared sanctions and non-deliveries, subsequently returning Moscow funds by the letter of the contract, the Defense Ministry itself sighed with relief ... And now - a new song the main thing"?
Comments from our readers:
Spartanez300
Chertt
Lopatov
Chamber or laboratory?
Naftogaz, together with the Ukrainian political leadership, is making every effort to at least somehow explain to the ordinary Ukrainian consumer many strange things. One of them: why for three years Kiev has declared that it will not buy gas from Russia, since it is “aggressor” gas, and now it declares what it will buy. And already the word “aggressor” has evaporated relative to the topic of energy procurement.
The country of the insane: why Ukraine was turned into a "chamber number XXUMX"
Price of Ukrainian independence: 10 billion dollars
Ukrainian Maidan logic:
Russia is an aggressor, we do not buy gas from Russia! Hooray? - Hooray-ah!
Russia is the aggressor, the Stockholm court obliged to buy gas from Russia (under contract). We buy gas from Russia, as it is cheaper than the same Russian gas, but in “reverse” from Europe. Hooray? - Hooray-ah!
Russia is an aggressor ... But gas is cheap, there are jobs for Ukrainians, we want to trade, we want, we don’t want, Donbass. Peremoga Hooray? - Hooray-ah!
And after all, there is no real expectation of enlightenment, because even the “attending physicians” are the most vociferous patients ... Or are people kept in laboratory white mice?
Comments from our readers:
Sibiralt
Rurikovich
And then suddenly such things start to happen, such disguises and changes in the air, even the most inveterate skeptics begin to appear questions about the discrepancy between the declared things and the real ones, that you understand the full depth and truth of the phrase “time will show,” especially if you are on your side ...
Alena Frolovna
You can not humiliate a person if he does not want to be humiliated.
Russian air carrier is not some kind of German autobahn ...
The Su-34 fighter-bomber and two Su-30М2 and Su-27 heavy fighters during the tactical flight exercises of the 4 Army of the Air Force and Air Defense of the Southern Military District landed on the highway.
Well, here ... And we continue to reproach all Russian roads. They are what we have! - the landing of three fighters in succession is maintained. Perhaps, it would be even better in the country with the road map and their coverage, if the technical task for the contracting companies initially added a clause to perform work with a “target” to land at least Tu-22М3 at any time suitable for the pilot and navigator. .
Comments from our readers:
Herculesic
Abrakadabre
RASKAT
And the strip on which they sat was seven or nine meters wide. Ordinary double-track, M24 highway, the village of Tatsinskaya.
All of Siberia under doping ...
Headlines each other more beautiful. “Having learned about doping tests, sportsmen are massively withdrawn from competitions” and stuff like that.
Why are there Siberia ... All progressive humanity has long known that only one person does not use doping in Russia - Vitaly Leontyevich Mutko. There was, however, one more - Grinya Rodchenkov, but he escaped from the bloody claws of a bloody gebni. The rest are lost people. Sometimes, with a homely brood of brood meldonium kaaaak smoked, sitting at a nuclear reactor, so at once - for the balalaika and dancing. At this time, all normal athletes are waiting in line for a doctor's appointment to receive hydromorphone ...
Comments from our readers:
Finches
Vard
Alstr
Therefore, I also do not understand kipisha.
By the way, when I participated in competitions in my youth, with an average number of about 30 people and a FULL absence of doping control, a couple of three people did not come due to illness.
The law is one for all?
In the Komsomolskaya Pravda publication, a material by Dmitriy Steshin was published, dedicated to the fact that Russian law enforcement agencies are preparing for the extradition of Nikolai Tregub, a defense member of Slavyansk, to Ukraine. Nikolay's personal data is in the database of the extremist Peacemaker site, and therefore it is safe to say that if Russia transfers Nikolay to the Ukrainian side, then the man will be punished by either radicals or representatives of the Ukrainian (American) special services.
When will they stop giving up theirs? A good question, especially if you specify in advance who is “at the top” considered to be your own. If we consider those who are ready to leave our home and family to weapons in the hands of protecting ordinary citizens and their land, they will always be thrown away. And “there”, apparently, are considered to be those who take the bags of currency in cash under the sofas, brazenly transfer funds from national programs to their personal accounts, and therefore they will always protect them forever. And so we have one law ... for all ... Yeah.
Comments from our readers:
Uncle lee
onix757
Pax tecum
The cynicism of the highest standard.
anjey
Minsk will move to Astana?
The Verkhovna Rada of Bandera’s Ukraine, 18, in January adopted a law “on the reintegration of Donbass” and denounced the Minsk agreements. Russia in this law is declared “aggressor”, “occupying” Donbass, establishing “occupying power” there. Thus, the Kiev regime creates political grounds for the resumption of the war in the Donbas.
Minsk process is buried. The President of the United States, Donald Trump, also proceeded to the funeral, stating that for negotiations "it is necessary to look for another capital." And it is necessary, by chance, next to Trump was the president of Kazakhstan, who said that "there is such a capital."
Does this mean that instead of Minsk-1 and Minsk-2 now will be born a series of new soap opera - “Astana”, in which the main roles will be performed in fact by the same people who lit up in the old “serial”. Batki has already commented: yes even in Antarctica ... There are many places there ...
Comments from our readers:
Finches
Boris55
And about the "Minsk agreements", as they are reflected in the UN resolution by the first paragraph, which the Rada in the same document recognized.
Victor Kamenev
Turkish arguments for force stripping Afrin
An alarming scenario for the division of the territory of Syria was outlined after the suppression of government forces using tactical and strategic aviation The videoconferencing, as well as the Russian Navy of the last large fortified areas of the IG (banned in the Russian Federation) in line with the Euphrates, as well as numerous defenders of the Jebhat al-Nusra (banned in the Russian Federation) in the western province of Idlib. While the Syrian government forces, together with specialists from the Russian army, are doing everything possible and impossible, freeing up the strategically important Abu Duhur air base in Idlib, and continuing to develop the offensive in the northern operational direction to close the large tactical cauldron Jebhat al-Nusra in in the provinces of Aleppo and Hama, Washington is forming a new multi-thousand-strong military force to oppose the SAA, as well as contain territorial claims of Ankara to the lands of Rojava (Syrian Kurdistan). The formation, called the “New Syrian Army”, will be represented by thousands of IS and Jabhat al-Nusra militants escaping from half-boilers, as well as representatives of the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces, which are armed with fairly modern small arms and anti-tank weapons, as well as “ take under the wing of the US Central Command. To legally justify such actions, the White House and the Pentagon are planning to deploy an impressive diplomatic corps in Rakka and Hasek this year.
As a result, the statements made by Vladimir Putin following the results of the APEC summit, as well as by UAR President Bashar Asad after the withdrawal of a part of the Russian military contingent from the Khmeimim airbase and other military facilities in the republic, do not quite correspond to reality. Recall that in the December statements, both leaders of the states noted: thanks to prompt actions, the Russian AUA and the CAA managed to save the territory of Syria. However, in reality, only about half of the territory today is under the control of the army of Bashar al-Assad; the rest is assigned to the pro-American SDFs (around 25-30% of the territory), the pro-Turkish Syrian Free Army and moderate opposition in the provinces of Aleppo, Idlib, Darya and Homs (around 20% of the territory, including the United States Marine Corps 55-kilometer security zone on the Jordan-Syrian border). The most difficult situation today is around the Kurdish Afrin, which is actually a major tactical boiler of the Kurdish YPG units. For a long time now, Turkey has been trying to find arguments for a forceful stripping of a weakened Afrin.
At the same time, in Afrin up to December 11, 2017 was attended by units of the Russian military police, deployed on September 8. They had a sobering effect on Ankara, and it would not be difficult to return them on duty. Such a move would be extremely advantageous for Moscow, because the capture by the pro-Turkish “moderate” Afriina promises further rampant pseudo-caliphate throughout the north of the SAR - up to reunification with the friendly “cauldron” north of Homs.
Comments from our readers:
Chertt
Vard
dSK
Greed, like any passion, has no limits. Total, total power over the world.
Serious type and serious problems
The observer E. Damantsev considered “a serious type of air-based tactical missile weapons”, which has the option of optional expansion for ground launch. This type is capable of creating "serious problems" for the units of the ground forces of numerous countries of the world, including Russia.
This is a promising multipurpose tactical missile JAGM ("Joint Air-to-Ground Missile"), designed to deliver point attacks on numerous types of stationary and mobile targets (from armored units and surface ships of small displacement to well-protected ground strong points).
The observer expects that forty-eight JAGM fire tests from AH-64D will force the Russian defense department to continue fine-tuning the Hermes-A project to the state of initial combat readiness.
Comments from our readers:
Now we are free
It would be time to install a detection / guidance complex, similar to the "Kiowa Warior" already on our advertised "Ansat" or "Kasatka" ...
Foxmara
Boris Chernikov
1. Following the logic of the author, the helicopter must hover in the air, not reaching 15 + km and being at a distance of 15-16 km, attack our armored vehicles. And you will have to work in a hang at a height of at least 20-30 meters. Following the banal logic, it turns out that an enemy helicopter with a probability close to 1 will find the equipment on the ground closer than 16 km, which automatically makes it a target for the air defense systems mentioned.
2. It seems that the troops will cover either the "Torah" or "shell". And what about the rest of the air defense ensemble? Where are the "Buki" and C-300В complexes? In fact, the air defense system in the Russian army implies a multi-level. So, the attack helicopter of the USA is within the operation of most types of air defense systems, taking into account that the helicopter can work only in purely polygon conditions at exactly 16 km, the real range of work will be in the same 10-12 km.
American metallurgists suffered losses in the Cold War
TASS, with reference to the report of the US International Trade Commission, publishes material on "affected American industry." The report stated that the US steel industry is “suffering losses” from the import of steel wire rod from Russia, Belarus and the United Arab Emirates. The material of the American experts states that the countries mentioned above supplied raw materials to the United States for the production of wire at a price that seemed to be 80% lower than the real price. Allegedly, such an understatement was deliberately implemented in order to subsequently hit the American industrial sector and conquer the American market.
To “conquest” did not happen, the United States decided to use a method that has nothing to do with an open competitive economy. The US Department of Commerce decided that the enormous duties would correct the situation. Thus, for the products of the Novolipetsk Metallurgical Combine, the duty is set at ... 757%! The average duty rate for Russian suppliers is estimated at more than 436 percent.
The agency’s report cites some indicators of "losses": the supply of metallurgical products from Russia caused "damage to the US industry" for millions of dollars.
For reference: in 2016, the United States purchased wire rods in our country for slightly more than 32 million dollars. Can such amounts cause “damage” to the world hegemonic industry? An amazing thing!
Comments from our readers:
Andrey K
The US metal industry is simply not trite with ours.
What has become of the matter - automate the process, pay attention to the costs.
Everything will be reduced to ousting our metal from the North American market with an increase in duties, and that’s all the declared US competition and adherence to WTO rules.
Shurik70
The main thing - we also need to do that.
Vladimir16
NOMADE
Well, probably, to move the slogans from the couch?
Russian threat: now under water
The Pentagon has officially acknowledged the threat to the United States from the Status-6 submarine system developed in Russia, equipped with a nuclear warhead of up to 100 megatons. A preliminary draft of the New Nuclear Policy Review contains a diagram that reports on the development in Russia of an intercontinental autonomous nuclear torpedo “Status-6”.
According to US intelligence data presented by The Washington Free Beacon, these weapons were tested on 27 on November 2016 from the Sarov submarine. “Status-6” has a range of 10 000 kilometers, maximum speed - above 56 nodes, the depth of the dive - up to a kilometer.
With this information, which became the property of the world community and catered to the American strategic document (more precisely, in its draft), there was an earlier curious incident.
More than two years ago, in November 2015 of the year, from the defense meeting with President Putin in the plots of Russian TV channels were footage of the presentation on the aforementioned “Status-6”.
According to the slides broadcast, the new system is a weapon of mass destruction, including for the destruction of the objects of the economy of the enemy. In connection with the leakage of information, the presidential press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, promised to take "preventive measures so that this would not happen again."
“Repeating” especially for Americans is not necessary: in February 2018, Mr. Trump is expected to sign a new defense document, which will endorse the new nuclear policy of containing Russia.
Comments from our readers:
svp67
Chertt
hrych
The king on the throne sat up?
The fact that Donald Trump has become a real "shame" for the United States and that it can be thrown off already in 2018 year, was told by the bold British newspaper The Guardian to the general public. There is an opinion that Trump will not stay in the White House until the end of this year. The reason for “come on, good-bye” is also known: the newspaper’s editors believe that President Trump is “dishonoring his country” at all levels.
The point is not only in the editors' opinion that Trump’s foreign and domestic policy consists of a series of “catastrophic mistakes - from tax cuts and policies on climate change to the question of Palestine and nuclear weapons.”
The point is not only that the very idea of its leadership is "contradictory, confrontational and irresponsible."
Trump's problem is not exclusively related to "his blatant racism, misogyny and chauvinism," although this is in fact "enormous problems."
His last “outrage”, when he called the developing countries “dirty holes,” terrifies with its stench.
The fundamental flaw in Trump’s presidency is his ignorance. His "often irritated and infantile behavior" is combined "with a stunning lack of knowledge and contempt for the facts." From this stem and a series of "chronic misunderstandings" Trump prints edition.
It is unlikely, we note, the impeachment will take place in the current year. Today, Mr. Trump is doing what even his former opponents, for example, John McCain and his colleagues in the US Senate, fully approve of. Bloomberg indicates that the US Treasury is finishing work on a list of Russian “oligarchs” close to Putin and his government. And the Russian rich are already panicking. According to sources, other people already in a panic turned to the United States, to those individuals who previously worked in the Ministry of Finance and the State Department and had experience in the field of sanctions. These rich Russians are trying to do everything to avoid falling into the black list. This publication said the former State Department Officer D. Fried. He already had to reject some of these requests.
In addition, the US Congress requires the Ministry of Finance to assess the impact of possible sanctions on government bonds of the Russian Federation. If the Trump government does this, it will deal a heavy blow to the financial system of the Russian Federation.
In this situation, the anti-Russian lobby in Washington is unlikely to venture to "overthrow" Mr. Trump. In recent months, even the noise associated with the Russian ties of the president has subsided.
In short, Trump has something to object to his opponents. The British press is completely sad if a supporter of the arms race Trump goes to 2020 for a second term ...
Comments from our readers:
rotmistr60
Varyag77
That is the main reason. Everything else is husk. American backstage embarked on the warpath with Russia. Anyone who tries to somehow interfere (slow down) becomes an enemy.
A. Privalov
Brave professor
In the intelligent part of American society, it seems, there has been a split. While one part of it calls for the Russians to be punished for “interfering with the elections,” another calls for ... to recognize the Crimea as Russian. Among those who advocate the latter, noted even a professor at the Naval College of the United States. In the big American press, this has become something of a sensation.
Russia is unlikely to part with the Crimea, and therefore Washington does not need to build a political strategy based on an “anti-historical foundation,” believes Lyle J. Goldstein, professor at the Naval College (United States Naval War College) in Newport, believes .
The Crimea peninsula is a picturesque place, saturated with Russian blood, the professor reminded. And now, for three years now, Western politicians, speaking of the Crimea, have been trying to appeal to "European security." They put everything upside down, arguing that Russia's takeover of the Crimea violated the “order” based on certain “rules”. In such statements, one hardly feels the idea of the Crimean War and its historical significance!
Neither blood shed by Russian people, nor story does not in the least interest the current neoliberal politicians running in the USA. Today, anti-Russian hysteria is being whipped up by a whole political choir, in which Washington sang along, and London sings along.
Nevertheless, the material of the professor of the military college, published in a large edition, testifies to a certain change in the opinions of the educated public in the USA. The thesis of recognizing Crimea as a Russian territory looks like a sound idea against the background of the hysteria of the painful American establishment, which focused on “intervention” and “annexation”.
Comments from our readers:
Vasya Vassin
shura7782
The vast majority of ordinary Americans (I’m not mistaken if I say), 99,9%, deep purple, whose Crimea.
It would be better to increase to the West information about what positive changes for the Crimeans have occurred over the years. The more foreign guests there are, the better. After that, one can hope that the ice has slowly broken.
prior
They also said: "Our Crimea!"
Whether they like it or not, whether they agree or disagree, this is a FACT.
Everything! The game is over. A curtain.
Bustle around grudinina
The absenteeism of the masses in Russia does not win, foreign experts say. Russians will not be lured to the polls by generous promises and promises of “prizes”, they cannot be overpowered by “creative” Kremlin propaganda, or drawn to ballots and ballot boxes by shrill “shows” on TV. The political apathy of the masses is great, and it is she who is the real opponent of Putin, who decided to rule the state for another six years. A low turnout at the polling stations will indicate a complete failure for the current owner of the Kremlin.
In the Russian press, the picture is different. Tutoshnye newspapermen are trembling for some reason, not before a low turnout, but before Grudinin.
Many Russian media are in a hurry to bury the candidate Grudinin, saying that he is even richer, even the “oligarch”, and had accounts over the hill, and something else out of order there. When so much fuss is made around an inconvenient candidate for the authorities, the impression is created that pointers were lowered from somewhere and orders were sent ...
Tricky comments. The media are buried together Grudinina, no one is looking at the electorate
With the rapid growth of Grudinin’s popularity and the transition not only to the communists, but also to a significant part of the opposition electorate, the one that K. Sobchak presents as a caricature of the opposition, the Kremlin’s “strawberry” critic has chances of winning.
However, everyone remembers how in 1996, Yeltsin won the election against Zyuganov. There is an opinion that Zyuganov eventually simply surrendered, not wanting to dispute his real victory. The broadest support of the extremely unpopular Yeltsin at that time by American political consultants and the White House is well known.
The Kremlin is now ponator in its own propaganda, American assistance is hardly needed. And the times are not the same: from the former friendship, the parties moved on to the war of sanctions. But are foreign commentators foreshadowing another easy victory for Putin, right? And Putin will be the alleged 70%? Or abroad, the Russian figure is underestimated, and it will be wonderful 146%?
Why not? How many spits did United Russia endure? And nothing - behind a loud victory in the parliamentary elections.
Comments from our readers:
populist
Lexus
Wayfarer
Klaus
I look right now "Vesti" on "Russia 1": about the elections (!) In our (!) Country - 2 minutes; about America and Trump - 5 minutes. What's this? And by the way, the election campaign in the United States that year on domestic television was covered at times more and more completely than the current campaign in Russia. Probably because the owners of the ocean are, respectively, and the interest is different.
Vadim237
shura7782
Pavil144
Information