Military Review

New frigate adopted in the Chinese Navy

48
At the Dalian Naval Base in Liaoning, a ceremony was held for the introduction of the Chinese fleet the new missile frigate "Rizhao" project 054A (class "Jiangkai II"). On Thursday, January 18, according to TsAMTO with reference to the press service of the Ministry of Defense of China.


New frigate adopted in the Chinese Navy


Rizhao was built in Guangzhou at Huangpu Shipyard of China State Shipbuilding Corporation CSSC (China State Shipbuilding Corporation). He was launched in April 2017 of the year. "Rizhao" became the 26-m frigate of the series, adopted by the Navy. Four more ships of the series are being tested.

Jankai II class frigates, built on the basis of the 054 project, are distinguished by a large number of advanced weapons and control systems. The lead frigate was commissioned in January 2008 of the year.

The total displacement of the ships of this series is 4053 tons, the hull length is 134 meters, and the width is 16 meters. Speed ​​- up to 29 nodes. Sailing Range - 3800 miles. Crew - 190 man.

Frigate armed vertical launch system with 32 cells for anti-aircraft missiles HQ-16, two launchers on four anti-ship missiles YJ-83, 100-mm artillery systems, the four anti-aircraft artillery CIWS complexes (Chinese analogue AK-630) and two triple tube torpedo 324 caliber mm.
Photos used:
Navy Recognition
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 18 January 2018 15: 44
    20
    The head frigate was commissioned in January 2008.
    26 in 10 years. No comments
    1. Alexander 3
      Alexander 3 18 January 2018 15: 57
      +3
      Yeah, what kind of comments are there. But ours are also trying. They would steal less, and stupidity is a hindrance.
      1. Muvka
        Muvka 18 January 2018 16: 16
        +3
        But even here the engines are not Chinese, please note. Chinese there is only a case. This is me about technology. About how science jumps from them.
        1. NEOZ
          NEOZ 18 January 2018 16: 31
          +1
          made under license ... can be considered Chinese.
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 18 January 2018 16: 50
            0
            Well then we can say that we produce BMW. So we have the best engineering in the world. Congratulations, comrades!
            1. Pirogov
              Pirogov 18 January 2018 17: 37
              +4
              Quote: Muvka
              Well then we can say that we produce BMW. So we have the best engineering in the world. Congratulations, comrades!

              You shouldn’t laugh. The main thing is that the Chinese are building ships, and at the same time quickly, and the engines under license, or not, is no longer important.
            2. NEOZ
              NEOZ 18 January 2018 17: 52
              0
              Well, what, in your understanding, is a licensed issue?
              here is the release of J11 in China (license), J15 (not license).
              Agree that it cannot be said about the lack of aircraft manufacturing in China.
              1. Mih1974
                Mih1974 19 January 2018 03: 20
                +1
                We can say that conditionally tomorrow Russia will stop supplying engines and their parts - a mustache, they can’t even assemble their own engine under license in China. The fact that they "do it themselves" does not even suit them. But for the frigates - they themselves make their own steel, their workers and their machines (even if they are made in Europe). And if theoretically, "tomorrow", the license holder will want to petition the Chinese to do more (well, such as a sanction), then the Chinese will just give a damn about it !! good It will be possible for 100500 years to sue them, but they will provide their fleet with frigates. Well done good
                1. NEOZ
                  NEOZ 19 January 2018 11: 39
                  0
                  those. my statement
                  made under license ... can be considered Chinese.
                  true !!!!!
                  Well, the planes are given as an example, only to confirm their claim.
        2. Tutu
          Tutu 19 January 2018 12: 13
          0
          China is negotiating the sale of technology and equipment to Germany

          At present, the Chinese market for the sale of airliners is the largest in the world. Despite the fact that the country's airlines acquire a huge number of aircraft of Airbus and Boeing, China is working on the development of its own passenger liners. Particular attention is paid to the development of jet engine. Scientists have developed a process for manufacturing turbine blades that can withstand high temperatures. These parts, the most important components in aircraft engines, determining their safety, power and reliability. Modern developments in the manufacture of turbine blades, together with new casting technologies and the successful development of aerodynamic configurations, have enabled Chinese scientists to create new powerful jet engines, such as WS-15 and J-20. At present, China is offering Germany to acquire new technologies and equipment for use in the manufacture of jet engine parts. The first stage of negotiations has already been completed. It is planned that Chinese representatives will visit Berlin in the near future in order to develop an expert proposal together with German colleagues.

          Source: https://aircargonews.ru/2018/01/18/kitay-vedet-pe
          regovory-o-prodazhe-germanii-tehnologiy-i-oborudo
          vaniya.html
          © AircargoNews.ru
          1. NEOZ
            NEOZ 19 January 2018 13: 35
            0
            why are you doing this? to the frigates of the Chinese Navy?
            or to
            conditionally tomorrow Russia will stop supplying engines and their parts - a mustache, they cannot even assemble their engine in China “under license”. The fact that they "do it themselves" does not even suit them
            ?
            or do you think that China has engine technology from this text?
            in my opinion, this text shows that China has found the reason for the poor quality of its engines and is looking for a technological solution to this problem in Germany ... perhaps in exchange for the creation of the J20 ...
    2. freddyk
      freddyk 18 January 2018 17: 25
      +2
      In the USSR, for the year alone, the Black Sea Shipbuilding Plant built 10 pieces each.
    3. Lexus
      Lexus 19 January 2018 00: 43
      0
      26 in 10 years. No comments

      Yeah, not only our "hot pyroedelny", but also the Merikosovsky "Wcdak" "nervously smokes on the sidelines."
  2. Masya masya
    Masya masya 18 January 2018 15: 47
    +6
    What to say? Impressive!
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 18 January 2018 15: 55
    +2
    Is the case width small? Something he comes out disproportionately narrow! belay
    1. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 18 January 2018 16: 01
      +3
      Chinese shipbuilders are no worse than others
    2. Alexander War
      Alexander War 18 January 2018 16: 01
      +1
      Is the hull width small? Project 11356 frigates width is 15,2 m Project 22350 frigates width is 16 m
      1. san4es
        san4es 18 January 2018 16: 29
        +4
        Quote: Alexander War
        Is the casing width small?

        ... They have everything calculated according to formulas (laws)

        February 2012
        1. Archivist Vasya
          Archivist Vasya 18 January 2018 16: 39
          0
          Well, the design - from bow to stern you can’t go along the sides, only through the insides ... I looked at the side passages to leave chtol (((and the 100 mm gun is so-so, even coastal fortifications cannot be pierced.
          There were articles by Comrade Kaptsov Oleg, so he knew a lot about 300-400 mm guns and armor.

          PS But the shipbuilding speed is Excellent!
          1. san4es
            san4es 18 January 2018 17: 23
            +4
            Quote: Archivist Vasya
            Well, the design ...

            ... optimal. Safe
            ... from the bow to the stern do not go along the sides

            am on the sides! .. stop nefig hang around! .. then look for such among the ocean.
            ... Oleg Kaptsov, so he knew a lot about 300-400 mm guns and armor.

            ... The time of the battleships has passed
            1. KVU-NSVD
              KVU-NSVD 18 January 2018 17: 28
              +5
              There were articles by Comrade Kaptsov Oleg, so he knew a lot about 300-400 mm guns and armor.
              A new adept in the sect of Oleg Kaptsov repeat
  4. ronnon
    ronnon 18 January 2018 16: 08
    0
    states will soon be less comfortable in the China Sea.
  5. bald
    bald 18 January 2018 16: 10
    +1
    In their repertoire, they are stamping, only manage to drag them away, and not only in the military-industrial complex. That's just the quality of industrial products, leaves much to be desired, to put it mildly, the best. Accordingly, the speed of construction of ships, during operation, will show negative results - but in general, time will show.
    1. NOMADE
      NOMADE 18 January 2018 16: 31
      +1
      Well yes, yes yes .., of course, the quality is lame.
      It was a sorcasm ..
      But in fact, in addition to the turbojet, parts of the air defense systems, they have already greatly overtaken us ..
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 18 January 2018 22: 18
        +1
        Quote: NOMADE
        But in fact, in addition to the turbojet, parts of the air defense systems, they have already greatly overtaken us ..

        What exactly, apart from quantity, did they overtake us in?
    2. Mih1974
      Mih1974 19 January 2018 03: 25
      +2
      ! The American tank is 4 times superior to the Chinese, but the Chinese are 10 times cheaper! )))) So here, until the war with the United States begins - the Americans will simply lose economically, the Chinese will "trample" them. Even if they have 30% permanently in repair, the remaining 70 - guaranteed to “crush” the Americans. Yes, at such a pace, the Chiatians behind each, every American ship that has sunk to their shores (straits or Taiwan) will be able to "pin down" 2-3 of their ships and thereby reduce their existence to meaningless. After all, the Merikas will not risk "authorizing" something or inspecting when they are on the sight of two or three Chinese frigates. tongue
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 19 January 2018 10: 39
        0
        US GDP is approximately 1.5 times higher than Chinese. So the “trampling” of the United States does not shine economically for the Chinese, even if the GDP is equal. But they can "give the go-ahead" in the conventional war in coastal waters. Their task now is to push the US fleet from its near seas. So that the Americans could not prevent their showdown with Taiwan and Viet Nam.
  6. next322
    next322 18 January 2018 17: 23
    +2
    Yes, just fantastic in China ..... this is being built !!
    1. zoolu350
      zoolu350 18 January 2018 17: 40
      +6
      It’s just that they periodically make bullet holes in the back of the skull to their “saw cutters and haulers”. We’ll start and we will do this, you look and the ships will be built much faster.
      1. faiver
        faiver 18 January 2018 18: 33
        0
        I’ve been talking about this for a long time ...
      2. KaPToC
        KaPToC 18 January 2018 22: 19
        0
        Quote: zoolu350
        It’s just that they periodically make bullet holes in the back of the skull to their “saw cutters and haulers”. We’ll start and we will do this, you look and the ships will be built much faster.

        Yes, at least shoot everyone until we start our power plants - the frigates will not go into the series.
        1. zoolu350
          zoolu350 20 January 2018 04: 24
          0
          I do not understand, but the ships of the Navy of the USSR did not go with their power plants? Where did it all go?
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 20 January 2018 05: 00
            +5
            Quote: zoolu350
            Where did it all go?

            In Ukraine, it remains. Like so much more.
            Quote: zoolu350
            ships of the USSR Navy did not go with their power plants?

            With their. Made in the USSR.
            Got it? wink
            1. zoolu350
              zoolu350 20 January 2018 07: 21
              0
              Of course it did. That is, engines for ships only in the USSR did? Just the same for all the fleets of the USSR? "The main boilers on ships of Project 956 used high-pressure boilers KVG-3 with hydraulic system RG-1134, and on the last ships of project 956 E and 956 EM boilers KVG-3 with electro-hydraulic control system RG-1134 (OJSC" SKBK "g . St. Petersburg). As a steam turbine installation, the GTZA-674 double-shell unit (Kirovsky Zavod OJSC St. Petersburg) with a capacity of 36,7 mW (50 thousand hp) was used. Let's even assume that it was so, although it’s proved above that it’s not so, but what prevented your owners from the Russian oligarchy from organizing production with pa engines in Russia, after the first Maidan in 2004?
              1. Golovan Jack
                Golovan Jack 20 January 2018 08: 00
                +3
                Quote: zoolu350
                Of course it came

                In less than two days laughing
                But it didn’t come in full.
                GTE, which we are talking about, did the same in Ukraine. And the test bench for them (and without test tests, they don’t put the engine on the ship. No way), too - in Ukraine.
                You could google it for two and a half hours, huh ... and not the bullshit that you got there, with a smart, kind, look.
                Quote: zoolu350
                What prevented your masters from the oligarchy of the Russian Federation from organizing the production of marine engines in the Russian Federation, after the first Maidan of 2004?

                Duc them and ask, "your" masters, what is there for me to go around?
                And hindsight is all strong. Where were you yourself in 2004? Why didn’t they puff out their cheeks and ring the bells on that topic?
                So blame yourself ... mafynka yes
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
  7. Charik
    Charik 18 January 2018 17: 42
    0
    Is it 4 anti-aircraft guns, it says here
  8. faiver
    faiver 18 January 2018 18: 35
    +1
    I envy white envy ...
  9. Nikolai Passerby
    Nikolai Passerby 18 January 2018 19: 03
    +5
    In general, the competition for control of the oceans, Russia lost ... This lag in Russia will only increase. And China is going to create four carrier groups - for starters ...
    1. KaPToC
      KaPToC 18 January 2018 22: 28
      0
      Quote: Nikolai Passerby
      In general, the competition for control of the oceans, Russia lost ...

      I draw your attention to the fact that China does not have a single submarine carrier of cruise missiles like our Anteyev or Severodvinsk ..
      1. Mimoprohodil
        Mimoprohodil 19 January 2018 11: 49
        +2
        Shipyard for the simultaneous construction of 7 nuclear submarines built, will build and SSBN. Moreover, they have a certain Type 095
      2. Nikolai Passerby
        Nikolai Passerby 19 January 2018 14: 51
        0
        Quote: KaPToC
        China does not have a single submarine carrier of cruise missiles like our Anteyev or Severodvinsk ..

        According to Sinodefence.com, at the end of 2005, the PLA Navy received the first batch of anti-ship missiles 3M-54E1 to equip eight diesel-electric submarines of Project 636 supplied by the Russian Federation. The 3M-54E1 missile is designed to destroy surface targets and consists of a launch and winged subsonic marching stage. Note that the “3M-54E1” together with the “ZM-14E” missiles (for hitting ground targets) and “91RE1” (for hitting submarines) represent one KR family - the Club Club missile system, with uniform and universal AS and Launcher, which allows you to vary the ammunition of military equipment on carriers, depending on the task and the specific combat situation. They distinguish: “C1ub-S” - designed for arming submarines with standard torpedo TA 533-mm caliber and “C1ub-N” - for arming surface ships with standardized vertical launchers.
    2. Mih1974
      Mih1974 19 January 2018 03: 28
      +1
      And SHO? tongue We’ll at least squeeze Sev. Arctic okyan tongue good . And in the world we were just for "beauty". Only the will of the head of Russia is needed so that even a small destroyer under the Andreev flag, the enemies (and not friends) would see as an "integral part" of the Strategic Missile Forces good laughing
      1. Nikolai Passerby
        Nikolai Passerby 19 January 2018 15: 10
        0
        Quote: Mih1974
        We’ll at least squeeze Sev. Arctic okyan

        May God keep the shelf zone ... China is building icebreakers - for what? Although you, the philhimonians, feel good in your fantasy world, you still have some kind of gyrus, and you should have it. to think ...
  10. exo
    exo 18 January 2018 19: 13
    +5
    Right, even forbid the news about China. So sad, we look against their background.
    1. zoolu350
      zoolu350 18 January 2018 21: 08
      +3
      Uh, no, you need to see who to equalize not in terms of theft, betrayal and wretched PR, but in terms of real affairs.
    2. Antares
      Antares 18 January 2018 21: 40
      +3
      Quote: exo
      Right, even forbid the news about China. So sad, we look against their background.

      for the opposite, there is Ukraine.
      And the news from China is disheartening for many.
      Yes, they are well done. Silent glanders, silently glancing with their own eyes, they do things day and night.
  11. Nemesis
    Nemesis 19 January 2018 08: 16
    +2
    The Russian fleet can only be envied, because the money of Russia today does not go to the fleet, but to the Ulyukaev’s yachts
    1. Nikolai Passerby
      Nikolai Passerby 19 January 2018 14: 30
      +2
      Quote: Nemesis
      for the money of Russia today goes not to the fleet, but to the Ulyukaev's yachts

      Ulyukaev is a petty fry in that "friendly team" ...