China continues to work out the concept of control of a swarm of small UAVs

According to the Chinese TV channel Hunan TV, Chinese engineers are successfully working out the concept of managing a swarm of small drones. Reports about it bmpd.

"The engineers of the National Defense Science and Technology Institute of the State Administration of Defense Science, Technology and Industry (GUONTP) of the Ministry of Industry and Information of the People's Republic of China are successfully working out the concept of controlling a swarm of small unmanned aerial vehicles," the material says.

Reportedly successfully demonstrated intensive ejection, air building and the creation of multi-purpose grouping.

A test of departure issues to a given area for an intelligence mission was conducted.

Work is underway on the formation of the environment, the implementation of cluster operations and other activities.

Comments

[rocket757]

Swarm mean?
I wonder who the sting is sharpening ???
The guys are oriental, but this is the case, you won’t understand without a bottle of figs!

[Shurik70]

Swarm UAVs are the future. Indestructible, irresistible.

[Vladimir16]

Quote: Shurik70

Swarm UAVs are the future.

Battle Carlsons! - here is the future !!! And notice this future for many years!

The Chinese learn to implant a propeller in a fighting Chinese and they will capture the whole world!

Implantation works are underway, but this is a mystery. And in parallel, they (the Chinese) are working out the technology of swarm of flies, or rather UAV.

[Going]

Quote: rocket757

Swarm mean?

So they will continue to multiply.

[Krabik]

There is nothing funny about combat flying foot soldiers.

And if they make a suit that protects the fabric from damage during acceleration above 20, they will be able to intercept the "axes".

Imagine the picture, the Americans decided to deliver a sudden disarming strike on China, and they fired flying infantry to intercept.

1 infantryman 20 yuan, and the "ax" 1 million dollars!

[KVU-NSVD]

Well, at the expense of the indestructible, it’s not a fact - no one canceled the damaging effect of EMP on electronics.

[Muvka]

Quote: Shurik70

Swarm UAVs are the future. Indestructible, irresistible.

EW funds will break this swarm with a bang.

[sa-ag]

Quote: Muvka

EW funds will break this swarm with a bang.

A swarm, respectively, will break the electronic warfare, aiming at a radiation source

[Krabik]

Before the swarm, you can blow up a rocket stuffed with balls.

As Comrade Brezhnev said, "and the Kirdyk young lady."

[siberalt]

It seems that soon our "Armor" will be in demand around the world.

[Krabik]

Our "Armor" in the exercises could not bring down a radio-controlled model with machine guns, which flew back to back.

I had to spend one of 4 rockets ...

[just exp]

this was corrected, recently there were firing and were also on video, they hit the first time.

[Krabik]

I fully believe that coaxial machine guns with a firing speed of 5 v / m in a production video can bring down a toy flying at a speed of 000 km / h.

And if the “ax” arrives at a speed of 800 km \ h, will the crew have time to hide?

And in general, I wonder if the weapon is generally checked for performance, or in which case they say "it drowned"?

[just exp]

Have you seen the size of that toy?
Can you compare with the size of an ax which incidentally only hits stationary positions?

[Krabik]

The “ax” is certainly as big as the back of a mammoth, but it also flies faster than a pedestrian.

Well, the shell is protected by stationary objects, for the troops there is a TOP.

Although it is not yet known that TOR can and can do anything at all.
And how it will be with the Shell, on the "Star" has no analogues in the world, but in the battle "she drowned."

[Shuttle]

Quote: Shurik70

Swarm UAVs are the future. Indestructible, irresistible.

There is nothing indestructible. Such is the dialectic. If someone was born, it means that he will surely die. If not born, it will never die. If anyone has collected the swarm, then it can always be dispersed. The swarm is just a new threat, not some kind of vundervaffe. A swarm consists of a mass of relatively inexpensive, and therefore not too complex devices. If complex drones ts car base, then on a swarm of small council you can find. Afraid of a swarm is not worth it, you should be ready to repel its use. And the fear is worth it, what we do not know.

[ZVladimir222]

- So far, air defense has not learned to reflect the mass raid.
This is physically almost impossible. It’s very difficult to repel hundreds of planes at once. And if it will be drones of 100 pieces at once?
Try to repel the attack "Grad" or "Katyusha".
Israel is trying - so far it has failed.
It will only get worse.

[Krabik]

Undermining the atmosphere of a nuclear charge will solve the problem of 100 pieces of controlled drones.

And we are actively working on EM charges without using nuclear warheads.

[just exp]

100 thousand complex drones with artificial intelligence will not even be pulled by the states,
Why do you need cheap drones? if work on gps it is jammed, if it works on the radio, it is jammed, if it works on inertia it is jammed in some cases and accuracy drops at times and it costs by no means a penny.

[Maz]

The monster shook, mischievously, enormously and barking ... Gene dropped out of Pandora's box. And hell will defend yourself.

[rocket757]

Of course they will multiply! But not everything is so sour, fairy tales for indestructibility, fatigue and all that jazz, fairy tales are there, they will remain for a long time !!! Although the developers do not need to sleep against the means. And as always, WE will come up with an asymmetric answer !!!

[KVU-NSVD]

Now all advanced in terms of UAVs of the country are doing this. Roy is one of the weapons of the future

[iliitchitch]

They are already very good, and drones will also begin to produce. Oh, what will it be ...

[ZVladimir222]

[/ quote] There are a lot of them, and drones will also begin to produce [quote]

That was the policy of the idiots who ruled the USSR. They nourished, raised and armed a dragon, which can devour us!
It was necessary to leave two of China: Mao and Chiang Kai-shek.
Let them beat each other for about 40 years (until there are 200 million of them left).
But no! Communist "friendship."
But we will not succeed in devouring them. Even this swarm. For them, we have Zagorsk-6 in stock.
Snooping - no one will save them from that swarm. they understand that. Not stupid.

[onix757]

At the time of the collapse of the USSR, the Chinese bought overcoats from border villages. More than 25 years have passed and on the adjacent side, instead of villages, skyscrapers have grown, and on our side has grown .. what has grown. Obviously, the claims should not be addressed to the USSR, but to the current federal regime

[Krabik]

On our side, birches and grass on the top of the head grew.

But our armored train is on the siding!

Well, I used to stand ...

[Livonetc]

On their own separatists in particular.
To India.
To taiwan.
Etc

[Clueless]

The ROY is not intended to attack, but to hold on to its or conquered territory when air defense is suppressed, etc. For example, a curfew is introduced, all who do not have the label "their" is destroyed by such a swarm, which is constantly in the sky. Cheap, efficient.
Imagine using it in Syria, poor barmels of current underground and would live, leaned out of a hole, received a grenade or rocket.
To conquer territories is not a problem now, the problem is to keep them, and to suppress any partisan movements without destroying the important technical structures that the conquerors need.

[sa-ag]

Quote: Bad

Imagine using it in Syria, poor barmels of current underground and would live, leaned out of a hole, received a grenade or rocket.

The aforementioned half UAVs sometimes hang behind their backs, only they are not aware of screwing the second to this half, but as they say progress does not stand still

[voyaka uh]

"when air defense is suppressed, etc. ////

On the contrary. The swarm is ideal for attacking air defense.
Destroy it (causing fire on itself) and then attack the antennas and radars.
The most vulnerable parts of air defense, for which explosives are not needed at all (ram)
or you need a minimum - a couple of hundred grams.
Moreover, a smart swarm can share, come from different directions, change its "leading" ..
The Chinese are not in vain training. The first to overcome technical problems (and there are many)
there will be a king.

[ZVladimir222]

- Yeah, but the adversary of that, “There are guns too,” as A. Dzhigarkhanyan said.
This is a new round of the arms race.

[san4es]

PRC conducts successful development of the concept of swarm control from small unmanned aerial vehicles

[corporal]

Quote: san4es

PRC conducts successful development of the concept of swarm control from small unmanned aerial vehicles

If this technology becomes available to different militias, the nature of wars will change dramatically.
"Shell" and its "classmates" will cease to be a panacea.
=======================================
Ours would not be late again, as with shock drones.

[san4es]

Quote: Corporal

.. the nature of wars will change dramatically.
"Shell" and its "classmates" will cease to be a panacea ..

... In this regard, there is a "Repellent" and his "classmates"

The Scientific and Technical Center for Electronic Warfare (STC EW) has developed the Repellent mobile complex, capable of detecting miniature UAVs and suppressing their control channels with powerful obstructive or directional interference. “Thanks to the ultra-sensitive radio intelligence reconnaissance station, Repellent is capable of detecting miniature air targets by their control signals at a distance of more than 35 km. To work in the near field, the complex is equipped with an ultra-powerful optical system capable of viewing miniature drones day and night in bad weather. "Repellent" is a rather large product, the weight of which is more than 20 tons. At the same time, the complex is able to work even in the most difficult arctic conditions at temperatures below minus 45 degrees and strong wind
“Currently, work on the complex has come to an end. He went through the entire cycle of necessary tests, including under the auspices of the Ministry of Defense, and fully confirmed the characteristics laid down at the development stage. Considering the adoption of the "Repellent" in service.

https://topwar.ru/106457-v-rf-razrabotan-kompleks
-reb-dlya-borby-s-miniatyurnymi-bespilotnikami.ht
ml

[corporal]

Quote: san4es

In this regard, there is a “Repellent” and his “classmates”

The thing is certainly great, but how many do they need to be made to cover all the vulnerable objects?
I am afraid that in the case of massive use, flocks of UAVs will simply be sold in quantity.
In addition, if a part of the attacking drones will be sharpened in advance for the attack of emitting objects (and there will be no need for HARMs), then it’s a matter of seams.

[san4es]

... Well, IM (in uniform) from the top knows better how to be

[rocket757]

Not everything is so sour, as I wrote ... the control source is calculated at times and .... in short, the source was a smoking funnel! This extreme impact, if there is no war and civilians may suffer !!! And so, according to the "beam" of control, an answer and hello are sent.
There will be a method of attack, there will be a method of defense and it can not be very passive !!!

[ZVladimir222]

.

[/ quote] On this account there is a "Repellent" and its "classmates" [quote]

- You know, this is bravado.
It is clear that some kind of nosrachi or ISIS with the militias will not create a sane "swarm".
But they will buy it from the Chinese. And those are not fools, so as not to provide such a repellent.
And everything is done simply: now the UAVs are radio-controlled (GPS, NAVSTAR) and other crap.
Here a million “repellents” can be invented.
But when the Chinese put on laser UAVs laser gyroscopes, CCD star orientation sensors, laser altimeters (with protective shutters that open for fractions of a second), and even some stray ones, they will lay down a flight program by reckoning and solder all the electronics into a grounded steel box - like " repellents "will not help at all.
And this work, for sure, has long been underway.

[san4es]

Quote: ZVladimir222

... But when the Chinese put laser gyroscopes, CCDs on the UAV .................................. .....
And this work, for sure, has long been underway.

... Well, now they’ll definitely put
(okay if disa)

[rocket757]

Schaub all this tricky feed you need energy and MUCH !!! Accordingly, there is no talk of micro drones yet. The nano battery, the nano generator is only for powering the nano consumer and is good! About any armor, range and security while there is no question ... work is underway and progress will be! only developers do not sleep with anti-drugs!
There will be a struggle, who whom! We will find out who will be the winner over time.

[Dedall]

It’s interesting, but do these Chinese people know that in our 70s the USSR was still working on a thermionic electromagnetic pulse? UAVs - they only think of the electricity of this very thing, and the babakhnet next to something developed by us, or by the Amers, and these swarms will fall in, like flies from dichlorvos.

[rocket757]

Here, here, the opposition \ installation is called "dichlorvos" ... it sounds so-so poetic!

[ZVladimir222]

- Yes, this is bad news. Roy is an extremely dangerous affair.
Humanity has come to the brink of real self-destruction.
The Luftwaffe also attacked in a swarm. But the devices were large and manned. And there were less of them hundreds and thousands of times. And remember the consequences!
And compared with what the Chinese can - Luftwaffe flowers!
Yes, even with nuclear weapons ... Apocalypse.

[Lexus]

China continues to work out the concept of control of a swarm of small UAVs

Work from the category of "piggy bank". If not now, then in the future such developments will be very useful.

[Bypassed]

On the Discovery channel 4 years ago, there was a one-hour broadcast about controlling a swarm of drones on the principle of an “ant family”