The Western coalition did not specify the data on weapons supplied to the Kurds

10
The representative of the Western coalition led by the United States refused to specify the type of weapons that are supplied to the Syrian Kurds, although the fact of the transfer weapons did not deny, passes RIA News.



Earlier, the Arab portal Al-Masdar News, citing sources, reported that the United States had transferred a party of MANPADS to the Syrian Kurds (YPG) as part of a secret deal. According to the portal, the weapons were handed over to the Kurds in the Afrin district in the north-west of the SAR.

The international coalition decided to prepare the military, to supply military equipment to our partners - the Syrian democratic forces, in order to break the last resistance of the IG (the group is banned in the Russian Federation). In connection with considerations related to their operational activities, we will not specify the details of the weapons that are provided to individual units in a particular location,
said the coalition press officer.

The Defense Post recently reported that the United States has begun creating so-called “border security forces” in Syria in cooperation with the Syrian Democratic Forces (VTS), which will be deployed in the territory’s controlled coalition.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    17 January 2018 09: 33
    If the Kurds were given MANPADS, then it is not a fact against whom they will turn. But Erdogan is definitely not necessary.
    1. 0
      17 January 2018 09: 38
      They also revealed America to me. We still remember Bin Laden.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +2
    17 January 2018 09: 33
    American planes can suffer as a result. Moreover, not necessarily in Syria.
  3. +1
    17 January 2018 09: 47
    refused to specify the type of weapons supplied to the Syrian Kurds
    If we discard all types of secrecy, which of course are present in such a case, then for some reason the question begs - and not this next deal for the benefit of enriching individuals? I think that this is not another Iran-Contras (1986)?
  4. +1
    17 January 2018 09: 47
    Again 25, how many articles can I post on this topic? request YES, will the Turks shred as much as possible, which is not clear? Americans and Russians do not fly there. And there are different Kurds, even Hrestians. They are fighting with themselves there.
    1. 0
      17 January 2018 10: 44
      Quote: Fedorov
      YES, will the Turks shred as much as possible, which is not clear?

      hi
      Mmdya. The confrontation between Ankara and Washington is getting stronger every day. It seems that by arming the Kurds with "active" weapons, the states are thus preparing the Iranian scenario for the Turks, despite the fact that Turkey is their NATO ally. Erdogan is not an easy choice.
    2. +1
      17 January 2018 10: 54
      Quote: Fedorov
      Again 25, how many articles can I post on this topic? YES, will the Turks shred as much as possible, which is not clear? Americans and Russians do not fly there. And there are different Kurds, even Hrestians. They are fighting with themselves there.
      You understand the "Fedorov", the fact is that the Kurds need to understand one thing - "The weapon will be American, and the corpses will be Kurdish. Moreover, all losses of the Kurds will be in vain. None of those who contacted mattresses achieved prosperity and peace. The last example is Urkaina.
  5. +1
    17 January 2018 09: 51
    Looking forward to shot down Turkish aircraft?
    Or is it for ours?
    Or for everyone at once?
    S.uchary.
    However, the Kurds made a major mistake - seduced by promises and persuasion.
    Or maybe the “leader” of the Kurds just got a corresponding account in a Western bank?
  6. 0
    17 January 2018 10: 22
    This is all done to strengthen the influence on Turkey.
    For what purpose - it is clear (Bosphorus, etc., etc.)
  7. 0
    17 January 2018 10: 58
    Did the Americas in the Afrina region discover ISIS again?
    Your affairs are wonderful ... At first they found oil, then test tubes with chemical weapons, then suddenly dictators were discovered. Now they have found the destroyed quasi-state.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"