Military Review

The US Navy held reconnaissance near the Crimea

52
The US Navy's P-8A Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft on Monday made a multi-hour reconnaissance flight off the coast of Crimea and Krasnodar Territory, according to the western aviation resources.


According to their information, the naval reconnaissance aircraft with a tail number 168432 and callsign PS156, departing from Sigonella airbase in Sicily, first made an approach to the coast of Krasnodar Region and cruised around Novorossiysk and Anapa.

The US Navy held reconnaissance near the Crimea


Then, flying in the opposite direction along the entire southern coast of Crimea, the American naval intelligence officer circled for a long time to the west of Sevastopol, occasionally approaching him at a distance of approximately 40 km. After that, he continued his flight over the Black Sea near the western tip of the peninsula.

At the same time, when flying near the Russian coast, the Poseidon dropped to 8 thousand meters.

After departure from the air base in Sicily, the flight route of the sea intelligence officer to the Russian shores on the Black Sea lay over Greece and Bulgaria.

Recall, January 7 American aircraft P-8A Poseidon has conducted reconnaissance off the coast of the Crimea, reports Interfax.
Photos used:
US Navy
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Captain smollett
    Captain smollett 16 January 2018 06: 59
    +1
    So what? Let's go give up?
    1. Finches
      Finches 16 January 2018 07: 07
      +4
      Yes, they will not come out from there! It seems to me that on-line is going on video, with views of the peninsula, right to the Pentagon, where high-ranking military watchdogs of the US Army sit, headed by the Chief of Staff and weep bitterly, swear, gripe with grief whiskey cursing a rag Obama and hand-footed Poroshenko , prosravyv wonderful aircraft carrier called Crimea! laughing
      1. Captain smollett
        Captain smollett 16 January 2018 07: 08
        +3
        With all due respect, Mr. Trelawney ... winkIn addition to the Crimea, they still have a damn dozen Aircraft carriers. And the retinue, relying on them ... So .... For a minute ... If that ... hi
        1. LSA57
          LSA57 16 January 2018 07: 30
          +2
          Quote: Captain Smollett
          In addition to the Crimea, they still have a damn dozen AVIANOSTSEV.I "retinue", relying on them

          so, after all, Crimea is an UNSUMPABLE aircraft carrier, and there are few such wink
          1. Captain smollett
            Captain smollett 16 January 2018 07: 37
            +3
            Well, after all, he’s the “aircraft carrier” of the CLOSED SEA ... Do we need it? He’s not this beautyOPEN Sea ... If you know what I'm talking about now ... wink hi
            1. LSA57
              LSA57 16 January 2018 08: 08
              +5
              Quote: Captain Smollett
              Well, after all, he is the "aircraft carrier" of the CLOSED SEA.

              so this is enough for us. the main thing is that striped people cannot use it
              He’s not this beauty

              but how beautiful it will sink ....
              understand. just what do they do? whom are we going to conquer on it? threaten a large puddle of striped? or where else?
              1. Svarog51
                Svarog51 16 January 2018 09: 20
                +2
                Namesake, hi Didn’t I see anything familiar in the rhetoric of my opponent, didn’t I smell? wink
                1. LSA57
                  LSA57 16 January 2018 12: 37
                  +2
                  Quote: Svarog51
                  Didn’t I see anything familiar in the rhetoric of my opponent, didn’t I smell?

                  the scent is lost laughing
                  1. Svarog51
                    Svarog51 16 January 2018 12: 48
                    +1
                    It happens. lol Now, I hope, recognized? wink
                    1. LSA57
                      LSA57 16 January 2018 12: 50
                      +2
                      Quote: Svarog51
                      Now, I hope, recognized?

                      Nope sad
                      1. Svarog51
                        Svarog51 16 January 2018 12: 53
                        0
                        Look at your face. hi
        2. Finches
          Finches 16 January 2018 07: 31
          +6
          The aircraft carrier will not enter the Black Sea! The USA did not need Ukraine, but the Crimea was needed, which would allow it to control the South of Russia and all the trade and economic routes of the Black Sea region, the entire Black Sea region and watch over Turkey and other allies from Eastern Europe! Moreover, stationary! So there you go! hi
          1. Korax71
            Korax71 16 January 2018 09: 09
            +1
            Why would they need a base in Crimea, if they could include Ukraine in NATO if they wanted to, then they would have appeared automatically there.
            1. Finches
              Finches 16 January 2018 09: 14
              +3
              To include Ukraine in NATO without entering into direct confrontation with a nuclear power is very problematic, but to deploy a military base, there are no special problems! Now, the United States is trying to keep Ukraine in the sphere of its interests, but without the Crimea, it does not represent such a strategic interest as with the Crimea - only more hemorrhoids!
        3. Mountain shooter
          Mountain shooter 16 January 2018 07: 56
          +3
          Captain, an aircraft carrier in the Black Sea is just a target. And the Turks will not let him through the straits. Not without reason, after ours demonstrated "Caliber" in Syria, aircraft carriers got out of the Persian Gulf ...
      2. Dormidont
        Dormidont 16 January 2018 07: 26
        +1
        Spying on naked vacationers?
        1. Separ DNR
          Separ DNR 16 January 2018 07: 41
          +4
          Quote: Dormidont
          Spying on naked vacationers?

          I would like to look at such naked extremals yes .
          Crimea, and the Kuban, although the South, but now I think, naked - Brrr ...
      3. svp67
        svp67 16 January 2018 17: 46
        0
        Quote: Finches
        Yes, they will not come out from there!

        So not only this one
        Marine reconnaissance with tail number 168432 and call sign PS156, flying from Sigonella air base in Sicily at the time of the drone raid circled between our bases ...
        Quote: Finches
        I’m afraid that on-line video goes

        Yeah, Crimean TV shows are watching. You just need to see where he scoured, and this is in the area of ​​responsibility of the "new" S-400 division ....
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 16 January 2018 07: 14
      +3
      Yeah. Some learn to scout, while others learn to aim. lol
  2. LSA57
    LSA57 16 January 2018 07: 03
    +1
    Recall, January 7 American aircraft P-8A Poseidon has conducted reconnaissance off the coast of the Crimea, reports Interfax.

    yes let them sniff out. not scary
  3. axay032
    axay032 16 January 2018 07: 04
    +2
    Well, that’s why everything is different for us like the “people”, well, flew in, Well, I looked and where is the tantrum
    1. Conductor
      Conductor 16 January 2018 07: 27
      0
      So it was possible and that our thread to raise Yu if MIG 31 is in the Crimea, then let him run away.
    2. LSA57
      LSA57 16 January 2018 08: 09
      +1
      Quote: axay032
      Well looked and where is the tantrum

      in the comments below laughing
  4. KOH
    KOH 16 January 2018 07: 06
    0
    And that no one shuganul? They’re cutting through ...
    1. LSA57
      LSA57 16 January 2018 07: 13
      +1
      Quote: CON
      And that no one shuganul?

      so he didn’t fly into our territory
      1. KOH
        KOH 16 January 2018 07: 17
        +2
        Duc ours also do not fly, but they are accompanied ...
        1. LSA57
          LSA57 16 January 2018 07: 31
          +1
          Quote: CON
          Duc ours also do not fly, but they are accompanied ...

          so ours accompanied. impossible without it
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 16 January 2018 11: 36
          +1
          Quote: CON
          Duc ours also do not fly, but they are accompanied ...

          Are you sure that nobody accompanied this Poseidon? You can accompany in different ways. Either pick up the interceptors, or they will keep the air defense systems in sight, or both.
  5. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 16 January 2018 07: 19
    +1
    Everything, as in the good Soviet times - their intelligence at our borders was wiped off. In the 90s, when they "made friends" with us in full, these devils did not hesitate to fly such equipment over our territory, with complete impunity, within the framework of "peace agreements."
  6. Herculesic
    Herculesic 16 January 2018 07: 19
    +5
    And why didn’t we intercept him, near the Crimea? Why is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs silent about unsafe flights in an area with heavy air traffic? Why, apart from the fact of espionage, no action was taken to suppress its on-board equipment or any countermeasures on our part? Who and why are we afraid in our airspace? ????
    1. Hagalaz
      Hagalaz 16 January 2018 07: 30
      +1
      I also thought the same thing. But the thought came that they might be waiting for them to fly in and turn it on? And measure yourself and the response time and parameters of electronic warfare. And he didn’t fly into our airspace.
    2. LSA57
      LSA57 16 January 2018 07: 36
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      And why didn’t we intercept him, near the Crimea? Why is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs silent about unsafe flights in an area with heavy air traffic? Why, apart from the fact of espionage, no action was taken to suppress its on-board equipment or any countermeasures on our part? Who and why are we afraid in our airspace? ????

      and where did you get the idea that you should tell EVERYTHING? and where did you get that he flew in an area with heavy air traffic? at civilian sides their corridors and the military do not go there. and in our Foreign Ministry there are no alarmists. since there was no reaction, then there was no violation of the border. ours are flying near their borders and nothing. on the next branch I discuss the flight of TU-160
    3. LSA57
      LSA57 16 January 2018 08: 19
      +4
      Quote: Herkulesich
      And why didn’t we intercept him, near the Crimea? Why MiD is silent about unsafe flights in an area with heavy air traffic

      I remind from the next branch
      Herculesych Today, 06:08
      That's why they and planes to fly, and the crews honed their skills! And whoever the toad strangles, let them drink valerian, buckets, and seize it with carvolol and validol! fool

      Well, how do you understand this?
  7. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 16 January 2018 07: 19
    +1
    Quote: LSA57
    Quote: CON
    And that no one shuganul?

    so he didn’t fly into our territory

    So we don’t fly in. However, we are met as dear guests in advance. In my opinion, it’s time for them to arrange such a reception that it would be dangerous to visit. Our pilots are able to do this. The main thing is not to limit them in their capabilities ..
    1. KOH
      KOH 16 January 2018 07: 25
      +1
      I say that they are comfortable giving reconnaissance then? ...
      1. Mar.Tirah
        Mar.Tirah 16 January 2018 07: 34
        0
        They are PARTNERS, however !!! Only here they stick a knife in our back without hesitation. Although an old photo, it's nice.
        1. KOH
          KOH 16 January 2018 07: 40
          0
          This is another matter ...)))) It's nice to watch ..)))
        2. BABAY22
          BABAY22 16 January 2018 08: 34
          +1
          Very similar to board 36 (the next day became 38). Only the right keel hit the Orion screw in 1987.
      2. LSA57
        LSA57 16 January 2018 07: 40
        +1
        Quote: CON
        I say that they are comfortable giving reconnaissance then ?.

        but why did you get the idea that we don’t conduct reconnaissance ???? millet reconnaissance aircraft so configured ????
      3. Piramidon
        Piramidon 16 January 2018 11: 27
        +1
        Quote: CON
        I say that they are comfortable giving reconnaissance then? ...

        And the fact that he was constantly on the sights at the S-400 does not mean anything? It is not necessary to raise planes every time to intercept.
    2. LSA57
      LSA57 16 January 2018 07: 39
      +2
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      . However, we are greeted as dear guests in advance.

      only accompaniment. eo long-standing practice.
      In my opinion, it’s time for them to organize such a reception that it would be dangerous to visit.

      what is the reception? they don’t cross the border. and told you that ours didn’t accompany them? all one to one. they are ours, ours theirs
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 January 2018 07: 23
    +2
    So they fly every week, so such events are no longer surprising. Some spy, others counteract. Everything is natural.
  9. Dormidont
    Dormidont 16 January 2018 07: 24
    0
    Why are they still not falling due to the sudden failure of all electronic systems?
    1. Conductor
      Conductor 16 January 2018 07: 29
      +1
      Korean Boeing, remember, the noise will be above the Eiffel Tower.
  10. Herculesic
    Herculesic 16 January 2018 07: 25
    +2
    Where are our learned crows, that in such cases they should fall into the engine of an adversary’s plane — just a couple, to guarantee the result? belay
    1. Strips
      Strips 16 January 2018 08: 34
      0
      Do not write nonsense. Intelligence was outside the borders of Russia. Something you do not write the same thing about the flight of TU-160 fool


      Herculesych Today, 06:08
      That's why they and planes to fly, and the crews honed their skills! And whoever the toad strangles, let them drink valerian, buckets, and seize it with carvolol and validol! fool
  11. shcishcok
    shcishcok 16 January 2018 09: 08
    +1
    Ha Ha Ha! we, therefore, fly in neutral waters - we are immediately "led" by NATO aircraft. And their plane flies at our borders - we are just stupidly watching. Are we - or what?
    1. shcishcok
      shcishcok 16 January 2018 09: 09
      0
      Are we - or what? (missed word ((((((...)
  12. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 16 January 2018 10: 37
    0
    Quote: BABAY22
    Very similar to board 36 (the next day became 38). Only the right keel hit the Orion screw in 1987.

    So it is. Yes, it "clipped" so that the wreckage of the propeller pierced the fuselage, and almost killed the observer inside nearby. Https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/conten
    t / 201604200808-3xfn.htm
  13. 1536
    1536 16 January 2018 12: 46
    +1
    No, well, with such "headlines" you will not go far. Again tracing paper from the BBC?
    "The Russian Air Force intercepted an American reconnaissance aircraft P-8A Poseidon off the coast of Crimea". Here it sounds!
  14. earloop
    earloop 16 January 2018 22: 11
    0
    Real combat training for calculating new esoks using aviation fuel from an overseas "partner"!
  15. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 17 January 2018 11: 31
    0
    Our Tu-160 also flew near Florida. Reconnaissance ships were spinning at US naval bases around Japan, again airplanes and ships were sailing.
    "Let someone tell me that I will end badly. Everyone has their own favorite work ... The work is clean, the work is nice. I look down at everyone, and this is the main thing!" (The song of rogue Rullet performed by A. Mironov)