Military Review

Chinese modular MLRS in Algeria

34
At the exercise in the 4 military district of the National People’s Army of Algeria, in the presence of the Chief of General Staff, General Ahmed Gayid-Salah, firing of the SR5 rocket launcher system manufactured by the Chinese corporation NORINCO was performed for the first time, reports bmpd.




“The combat vehicle of the MLRS SR5 is made on the chassis of the Chinese Taian TA5310 (6x6) and has a modular bikaliber launcher capable of using two transport-launch containers with missiles of two calibers - six 220 mm missiles or 20 missiles of 122 missiles. The launcher is equipped with a charging system for the modules (similar to that used on the American MLRS MLRS), ”the material says.

The firing range of 220-mm missiles is up to 60 km, and 122-mm missiles is up to 40 km. In this case, the possibility of using 220-mm missiles Shenlong 60 and Dragon 60 with inertial-satellite correction or laser semi-active guidance system in the final segment is announced.



The Algerian Defense Ministry became the third well-known recipient of the MLRS SR5 after the Marines of Venezuela and Bahrain.
Photos used:
https://www.youtube.com
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Irokez
    Irokez 15 January 2018 12: 49
    +1
    Hmm, but an interesting option for the diversity of the installation. There are such ammunition shoot, there are others you can shoot too. Some kind of versatility. Type machine with different barrels for different cartridges.
    1. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 15 January 2018 13: 05
      +8
      This is a long-known scheme for batch charging systems. It has both pros and cons. Fundamentally - nothing complicated - the TZM arrives, takes off the shot package and puts another one with the desired caliber, and the commander on the automated control system simply switches to another program for calculating the settings for firing
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 15 January 2018 13: 16
        +5
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        TZM arrives, removes the shot package and puts another

        Specifically, this installation can do without specialized TZM. Principle, like the Americans, the lift on the package. Which is able to remove an empty TPK and install a new one directly from the ground or from an ordinary truck.

        1. KVU-NSVD
          KVU-NSVD 15 January 2018 13: 22
          +4
          Well or so - then the calculation abundance of such BM is interesting
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 15 January 2018 13: 25
            +3
            Five people.
    2. Maz
      Maz 15 January 2018 14: 28
      0
      And I wonder why they are Algeria? Is it really so dangerous. Libya nearby, France, Italy, Spain, Gibraltar ...
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 15 January 2018 15: 21
        +3
        About the best "friend" - Morocco forgot. They have national - to measure someone thicker in every aspect.
  2. faiver
    faiver 15 January 2018 12: 58
    0
    Chota 220km somehow I do not really believe it
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 15 January 2018 13: 26
      +1
      Where did you see 220 km?
      1. faiver
        faiver 15 January 2018 13: 28
        +1
        pah damn exactly the same caliber, sorry ... hi
  3. skomfit
    skomfit 15 January 2018 13: 00
    0
    Why a pentathlete will lose to each champion in one of the pentathlon types, as the quantity goes against the quality.
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 15 January 2018 13: 13
      +4
      Quote: skomfit
      Why a pentathlete will lose to each champion in one of the pentathlon types, as the quantity goes against the quality.

      This principle does not apply here. In most cases, multi-caliber MLRS outperform mono-caliber in terms of more optimal destruction of targets at different ranges.

      The only problem is some redundancy of large machines at the battalion brigade level. However, apparently, the Algerians decided to use TOC as the "near" MLRS.
      1. ProkletyiPirat
        ProkletyiPirat 15 January 2018 16: 25
        +1
        Quote: Spade
        The only problem is some redundancy of large machines at the level of the battalion brigade

        In the sense of redundancy? In theory, on the contrary, the number of cars has been reduced, because instead of hail + tornado, there is one bag, and the lack of TZM again reduces the number of cars. So where does the redundancy of cars come from?
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 15 January 2018 17: 16
          0
          Quote: ProkletyiPirat
          In the sense of redundancy?

          In terms of bringing one tray of bread to a private store is better on a pick-up truck than on a truck.
          1. ProkletyiPirat
            ProkletyiPirat 15 January 2018 17: 46
            0
            Please explain, I did not understand, no, I understand about the pickup, but how does this relate to the MLRS?
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 15 January 2018 18: 16
              +1
              Well, here we are, they originally wanted a monster called "Tornado", capable of using any missiles, and which was supposed to replace the MLRS of all levels, from regiment brigade to artillery RGVK
              But it turned out that at the level of the brigade regiment, where almost the only 122 mm RS is used, the Astrologer's chassis is clearly redundant. There for the eyes of the “Urals” enough. With all the consequences in the form of value. And the machine itself, and the service, and the fuel and lubricants consumed.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. ProkletyiPirat
                ProkletyiPirat 15 January 2018 18: 54
                0
                I realized, why then on the chassis of the Kamaz do not put? Ural clearly hood interferes, but on KAMAZ yes 8x8 why not put?
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 15 January 2018 19: 48
                  +2
                  Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                  I realized, why then on the chassis of the Kamaz do not put?

                  Due to the tendency to capsize. The Kazakhs have already delivered, now they are suffering.

                  1. ProkletyiPirat
                    ProkletyiPirat 15 January 2018 20: 16
                    +1
                    another proof that neither the military nor the manufacturers are reluctant to engage in analytics in the field of technology, that’s not the fate of moving packages to the center and down, but the aiming elements to the side and top, thereby lowering the center of gravity and moving the bulk to the center, solving the problem of shifters. madhouse in general wassat
                    1. Lopatov
                      Lopatov 15 January 2018 20: 23
                      0
                      Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                      it’s not fate to transfer packages to the center and down

                      No luck, the cabin will limit the sector of guidance on the horizon. And this is not good.
                      1. ProkletyiPirat
                        ProkletyiPirat 15 January 2018 20: 29
                        0
                        Huh? cabin? so what is the problem to tighten the car? still shoot from a closed position!
                    2. Lopatov
                      Lopatov 15 January 2018 20: 37
                      0
                      Quote: ProkletyiPirat
                      so what is the problem to tighten the car?

                      The problem is the need to re-orient the machine. And it is very likely that when shooting at long range the built-in means of the machine itself will not be enough.
                      That is, in the worst case, a top loader will have to drive up to each of them, spin up the gyrocompass, orient the package in a new way. Somewhere 5-10 minutes for each car.
                      1. ProkletyiPirat
                        ProkletyiPirat 15 January 2018 20: 58
                        +1
                        but after all, the MLRS does not shoot in a circular, and again, what is the problem of lowering the height of the cabin or changing the design of the carriage? For example, let there be not one but two lifting points for vertical guidance, one slightly in front of the other behind, and it is their sum that determines the aiming angle, that is, it is possible to raise the rear and the rear, and thus with the same cabin, get the same angles. Yes, I have to introduce an additional amendment to the ballistic computer, but I do not see this as a particular problem.
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 15 January 2018 13: 49
      0
      In this case, another comparison is appropriate - the Pentathlon Champion versus local punks .... and with the beginning of the use of 220mm and 300mm satellite-corrected missiles, such installations become very important.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 15 January 2018 14: 04
        +1
        Quote: Zaurbek
        In this case, another comparison is appropriate - the Pentathlon Champion versus the local punks.

        In the annex to this particular MLRS, the champion has his left hand tied behind his back. Apparently, the Norinko could not achieve acceptable dispersion during modular loading. Therefore, 220-mm only in a controlled version. To the target area of ​​the ANN with correction by LPS, in place, laser illumination. It turns out an acceptable accuracy with a three-meter water meter.
    3. donavi49
      donavi49 15 January 2018 15: 27
      +3
      In this case, this is the evolutionary development of systems.

      Batch charging gives too big advantages, including in combat terms.

      If replaceable packages are realized, then the trailer is able to put packages with different caliber.

      It doesn’t matter for the modern ACS - they’ll enter the shooting data for it, and it’ll just do the correction for the indicated type of missiles.
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 15 January 2018 15: 46
        0
        He meant the accuracy of an ordinary package and a replacement one. Probably will be different ...
        1. ProkletyiPirat
          ProkletyiPirat 15 January 2018 16: 29
          0
          this is only an idea for a larger caliber because of the departure from the "ideal-optimal" ratio of the length and diameter of the rocket, it is treated with a longer chassis and a longer packet length with a larger caliber ...
  4. kapitan92
    kapitan92 15 January 2018 13: 03
    +4
    Quote: Irokez
    Some kind of versatility.


    "Hurricane-1M."
    TTX.

    Classification
    multiple launch rocket system
    Chassis MZKT-7930
    History

    Country of development Russia
    Year (s) of operation
    with 2016
    dimensions
    Weight in combat position, kg
    no more 44500
    Length in stowed position, mm
    12 699
    Width in the stowed position, mm
    3070
    Clearance, mm 400
    weaponry
    Caliber, mm
    220/300
    Number of guides
    30/12

    Firing Range, m: minimum - 8000;
    maximum - 12000
    Area of ​​defeat, m²
    672 000

    Mobility
    engine's type
    YaMZ-846
    Engine power, hp Xnumx
    Maximum speed on the highway, km / h
    70
    Cruising on the highway, km
    1000
    Wheel formula 8 × 8
    http://www.arms-expo.ru/news/vooruzhenie_i_voenna
    ya_tekhnika / noveyshaya_rszo_uragan_1m_postupila_v
    _mikhaylovskuyu_artilleriyskuyu_akademiyu /
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 15 January 2018 13: 51
      +2
      Only KAMAZ with one package would be more correct
      1. kapitan92
        kapitan92 15 January 2018 15: 10
        +3
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Only KAMAZ with one package would be more correct

        And one rail would fit on the GAZ 53 base! laughing Where did you "dig" this photo?

        TTX installation "Hurricane - 1M" cited above. hi
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 15 January 2018 15: 48
          +1
          It is better to exploit 2 KAMAZ than one hurricane such laughing
  5. RUSS
    RUSS 15 January 2018 14: 22
    +2
    The Chinese are slowly squeezing the arms market from the United States and Russia, the price and only the price .....
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 15 January 2018 15: 20
      +7
      In this case, Trump Buteflike and the old rifle will not sell - he treats him no better than Iran. Obama, in principle, too - but he's better.

      Therefore, the EU remains (active cooperation, especially in helicopters and navy), China (active cooperation in land forces and navy) and the Russian Federation.

      They wanted generalists with packages and ACS.
      There are such China and the Russian Federation. But from China - order and ship. For the Russian Federation - order and wait, for there are prototypes only.

      The choice is obvious.