Military Review

The American UDC "Uosp" went to the Japanese port

35
Today, around 9 in the morning, the American versatile amphibious assault ship "Wasp-class" entered the port of Sasebo USA base in Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan, RIA News with reference to the NHK broadcaster.




According to the information, the length of the ship is about 250 meters, displacement - more than 40 000 tons. UDC is capable of carrying 1600 marines. His crew is a 1100 man.

The ship was upgraded to accommodate Osprey converters and the newest X-NUMX-generation F-5B fighter jets with a short take-off and vertical landing.

The arrival of Uosp to Japan is "part of the long-term US efforts to deploy the most advanced military assets in the region" against the background of the North Korean threat, the report said.

The American UDC "Uosp" went to the Japanese port


The television company notes that "dozens of union members gathered in the port in protest against the arrival of the American ship." In their opinion, this step "will only increase tension in the region."

The deployment of the UDC in Japan has already caused concern in Pyongyang, which sees in it the threat of a landing on its coast.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com, https://twitter.com/NHKWORLD_News
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 14 January 2018 15: 26
      +3
      "The television company notes that" dozens of union members gathered at the port in protest against the arrival of the American ship ""
      No dozens are few, but if there were a hundred people, then of course the Americans would have turned their bases in Japan and gone to their puddle
    2. faiver
      faiver 14 January 2018 15: 33
      +2
      can't you anymore? did I miss something?
      1. Teberii
        Teberii 14 January 2018 15: 41
        0
        It’s just that the Japanese were shown their place, otherwise they make voyages across American territories.
      2. zadorin1974
        zadorin1974 14 January 2018 15: 44
        0
        faiver Do not worry. Striped irony woke up.
        1. faiver
          faiver 14 January 2018 19: 19
          +2
          Yes, I don’t worry, only wondering who the North Koreans have offended in the last 50 years? in my opinion, only they themselves have time
    3. dvina71
      dvina71 14 January 2018 15: 55
      +3
      Quote: The_Lancet
      This feeling when you can no longer destroy neighbors with impunity ..

      Sound the list of such neighbors?
      1. The_lancet
        The_lancet 14 January 2018 15: 58
        +1
        South Korea. In respect of which special agents from Sev. Korea’s attacks were committed. You can search more in my comments
        Rangoon attack (1983)
        The explosion of a Boeing 707 over the Andaman Sea (1987)
        The Forgotten Conflict (2002)
        Destruction of the ship "Cheonan" South Korea torpedo (2010)
        Shelling Yeonpyeong Islands with DPRK Artillery
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 14 January 2018 16: 06
          +2
          Quote: The_Lancet
          South Korea

          Do not put forward such lists under your flag .., except I am sure that the DPRK can also provide something similar ..
          1. The_lancet
            The_lancet 14 January 2018 16: 08
            +1
            Do not put forward such lists under your flag.

            However, this list does exist. And probably there is nothing to answer specifically to these facts ... I thought so.
            Therefore, it makes no sense to continue this senseless argument

            This also applies to the site visitor. Herculesic
            1. dvina71
              dvina71 14 January 2018 16: 41
              +4
              Quote: The_Lancet
              However, this list does exist. And you probably have nothing to answer specifically for these facts.

              The list is nothing ..
              1. The members of the official delegation were killed by intelligence agents .. under the concept of terrorist attack does not fall.
              2. A very suspicious evidence base .., which is based on the words of one girl who was first sentenced to the tower, and then pardoned .. Given the background of what was happening at that time .. USA, for example, to flood the passenger side for its own purposes .. just spit .., but beyond the DPRK, neither before nor after ..
              3. I do not understand .. are you talking about a computer game?
              4. The same as with an airplane .. The main evidence .. a screw marked DPR .. I understand .. for the United States and washing powder in vitro is enough to start a war .. but not the whole world of the United States.
              5. Military action .. the shelling was bilateral .. the victims both there and there ..
              In any case .. the actions of the DPRK are beyond the bounds of common sense .. if they go out .. then not much ..
              And to the high standard of the United States, oh, how far .. they didn’t destroy cities with peaceful nuclear weapons.
        2. Herculesic
          Herculesic 14 January 2018 16: 06
          +4
          Lancet - did you write about your Trump? Or about your America in general? Eunu is so far away! Your little boy is a planet-wide heatblower whose power from the seas of the blood of the innocent can make a dozen Arctic Oceans! fool
        3. APASUS
          APASUS 14 January 2018 16: 31
          +4
          Quote: The_Lancet
          South Korea. In respect of which special agents from Sev. Korea’s attacks were committed. You can search more in my comments
          Rangoon attack (1983)
          The explosion of a Boeing 707 over the Andaman Sea (1987)
          The Forgotten Conflict (2002)
          Destruction of the ship "Cheonan" South Korea torpedo (2010)
          Shelling Yeonpyeong Islands with DPRK Artillery

          What does your country have to do with Korea or Japan? Take care of your attacks! Kennedy’s murder left so many questions, or how the physical laws pulled themselves under them (the official version - the titanium chassis evaporated in a place with engines) when they were looking for a titanium chassis from a Boeing in the Pentagon building. Or how is Colin Powell doing, can you see the tube?
          1. Rurikovich
            Rurikovich 14 January 2018 16: 58
            0
            Quote: APASUS
            Kennedy’s murder left so many questions, or how the physical laws pulled themselves under them (the official version - the titanium chassis evaporated in a place with engines) when they were looking for a titanium chassis from a Boeing in the Pentagon building. Or how is Colin Powell doing, can you see the tube?

            laughing
            What is allowed to Jupiter - not allowed to the bull wink repeat Trump will say that 2x2 = 5, which means that it is so lol
            1. antivirus
              antivirus 14 January 2018 17: 07
              0
              Trump will say that 2x2 = 5, which means that it is so
              He’ll be richer
              but about the rest of the world - there are a lot of health questions, if that’s recognized
          2. The_lancet
            The_lancet 14 January 2018 17: 15
            +1
            the official version - the titanium chassis evaporated in a place with engines) when they were looking for a titanium chassis from a Boeing in the Pentagon

            Because people like you usually do not know how to work with information and operate on fictitious arguments (typical conspiracy theorist)
            The stupidity you wrote is not an official version.
            Here in the real world it is known that the Pentagon was attacked by a Boeing 757.
            Its details were discovered (engine and chassis as well). And you were mistaken. Or you are deceiving people on purpose.





            A large amount of soft aluminum metal was used in the design of the aircraft, but despite this, the largest parts were recognized
            1. Okolotochny
              Okolotochny 14 January 2018 17: 20
              +5
              Iraq, Libya, Syria and others. Do not tell me how many lives were claimed in these wars and who unleashed them? Not in your place to swing lists. Judging by your logic, it’s time for the United States to surround with a fence and military bases so that others do not interfere. You have become an Empire of Evil.
            2. APASUS
              APASUS 14 January 2018 17: 51
              +1
              Quote: The_Lancet
              Its details were discovered (engine and chassis as well). And you were mistaken. Or you are deceiving people on purpose.

              If it’s not difficult for you, these pictures are geo-referenced, so as not to be unfounded.
              And one more thing to start:
              officially a Boeing 757 of American Airlines crashed into a building. The question is, where did the plane go - there were no debris at the crash site. Could he just disappear into the air? Yes, and a five-meter hole, as if pierced by a Boeing, the wingspan of which is 38 meters, and a height of 13,5 meters, you must agree, inspires some doubt.

              You can easily find the projection of the aircraft on the Pentagon building, it does not work out physically!
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. APASUS
                  APASUS 14 January 2018 17: 56
                  0
                  Quote: The_Lancet
                  If it’s not difficult for you, these images are geo-referenced

                  Use the Google Image Search

                  The answer was no and no!
                  Thank you very much!
                  Somehow I imagined our dialogue, I dare not bother you anymore!
                  1. The_lancet
                    The_lancet 14 January 2018 17: 57
                    +1
                    If it’s not difficult for you, these images are geo-referenced

                    You can use the google service "image search."
                    The answer was no and no!

                    The answer has already been provided. Will you now ask 100 times to prove something?
                    Where is the point of proving something to a person who does not verify the truth of his "arguments"? Once I have already corrected you.
                    the official version - the titanium chassis evaporated in a place with engines) when they were looking for a titanium chassis from a Boeing in the Pentagon

                    You are very funny. Honestly
                    1. APASUS
                      APASUS 14 January 2018 18: 07
                      0
                      Quote: The_Lancet
                      The answer has already been provided.

                      What is the answer? Chassis from the picture? Well, all adults, tie on the ground and everyone will immediately believe in the size of the bolts
                      Quote: The_Lancet
                      Where is the point of proving something to a person who does not verify the truth of his "arguments".

                      Truth is born in the argument, you do not accept objections at all. Well, since you are so sure, why do not you uphold your words?
                      Quote: The_Lancet

                      You really are very funny:

                      You are not funny, you are just a propagandist, but you have to give you justice, well prepared
                      1. The_lancet
                        The_lancet 14 January 2018 18: 09
                        +1
                        you are just a propagandist

                        No, I don’t do propaganda. The fact is that my point of view is different from yours and I try to give evidence. You yourself called it a "dispute".
                        Most site visitors do not even want to understand the messages. They just write some kind of garbage.
                        However, it seems to me that you are different from them. For the better :)
            3. Rurikovich
              Rurikovich 14 January 2018 18: 13
              0
              Quote: The_Lancet
              The stupidity you wrote is not an official version.

              Ash, how many stupid things in America are declared the official version and everyone stupidly believes in them - and nothing, America is the whitest and fluffiest wink There is no need to believe in conspiracy theories, but simply put everything in a heap to understand that the truth broadcast by the American media is not true hi
              Quote: The_Lancet
              here in the real world it is known that the Pentagon was attacked by a Boeing 757

              In the real world, normal people would produce recordings from surveillance cameras, of which there are dozens of around the Pentagon ... BUT! Where are these records, Ash? Which is easier already - just show the video from the camera where BOEING crashes into the Pentagon - and that’s it, all the questions are removed request .
              Where are these records, Ash?
              If this

              If you consider evidence, I’m just sorry for America - it has slipped to such a primitive level of world perception that it’s a mockery to bring such “evidence” to an American hi
              And these are the only images provided from a heap of cameras that allegedly prove that this is a Boeing (Boeing, Karl) laughing
              1. faiver
                faiver 14 January 2018 19: 25
                0
                I understand this is a Boeing invisible?
        4. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 14 January 2018 17: 33
          +2
          Quote: The_Lancet
          South Korea. In respect of which special agents from Sev. Korea’s attacks were committed. You can search more in my comments
          Rangoon attack (1983)
          The explosion of a Boeing 707 over the Andaman Sea (1987)
          The Forgotten Conflict (2002)
          Destruction of the ship "Cheonan" South Korea torpedo (2010)
          Shelling Yeonpyeong Islands with DPRK Artillery


          The occupation of Afghanistan, the creation of Alkaida, the creation of the Taliban, the financing and protection of opium factories in Afghanistan, the destruction of Serbia, the destruction of Libya, the destruction of Iraq, the creation of ISIS, an attempt to destroy Syria. This is directly related to terrorism by the United States. You can still list all the countries in which America overthrew the government.

          So just block the fountain.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Okolotochny
              Okolotochny 14 January 2018 23: 37
              +4
              That is, you didn’t bomb Yugoslavia? Aren't you invading Iraq? Libya was not bombed by you and not your Foreign Ministry shouted Wow at the shots of reprisal against Gaddafi? Weren't you trying to rip up Syria?
            2. gaura
              gaura 15 January 2018 05: 46
              +1
              Cleverly jumped. much more specific facts than the bombing of Serbia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria. How many cases of bombing of civilians by oblique American pilots in Syria? Can they buy glasses, or sell a plane?
        5. Mikhail Zubkov
          Mikhail Zubkov 15 January 2018 00: 54
          +2
          You Americans are arrogant provocateurs and arsonists. The Tonkin incident was 100% fake, but you invaded Vietnam and killed hundreds of thousands of civilians there. And until they began to lose planes and pilots in the hundreds, they continued to burn Vietnam with napalm and chemical weapons. You won’t be allowed to deal with North Korea like that, and your losses will be much more severe. China has already publicly said that it is preparing for war. Russia has not yet announced the same thing, since it is actually preparing for it, without further ado. Get out of your poorly protected limits, for good and for good, as the Russians say, until you start to be hit hard on your metis faces!
  2. Rusland
    Rusland 14 January 2018 15: 29
    +9
    It seems he was conceived as an aircraft carrier. This fool will have to load and unload only in comfortable conditions.
  3. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 14 January 2018 15: 32
    +1
    Imaginative news. There, all of Japan is in US bases and ships, like a street dog in fleas. One more, one less. Nothing changed.
  4. Observer2014
    Observer2014 14 January 2018 15: 41
    +2
    The United States forcibly give such a ship for five years to Ukraine. With the condition of returning back in perfect condition bully And the sheep are safe and the wolves will be fed repeat Finish Ukraine economically. And at the same time help with lethal weapons. In general, give. And we will end this appendicitis.
  5. san4es
    san4es 14 January 2018 15: 53
    +2
    Performance characteristics
    Type "Wasp" (Wasp)
    Displacement: 41 150 t.
    Dimensions: length 253,2 m, width 31,8 m, draft 8,1 m
    Power plant: twin-shaft steam turbine (two turbines) with a capacity of 70 liters. with.
    Speed: 22 knot
    Navigation range: 9500 miles with 18 ties.
    Crew: 1208 people.
    Landing capacity: 1894 people.
    Cargo capacity: 2860 m3 for the main cargo and 1852 m2 for equipment.
    Planes and helicopters: AV-8B, AH-1W, CH-46, CH-53 and UH-1N, the number depends on the task.
    Armament: two eight-shot launchers Mk 29 of the Reigeon company for missile launcher Sea Sparrow with a semi-active radar guidance system, two launchers Mk 49 of the company General Dynamics for missiles RIM-116A (infrared guidance system); three six-barreled 20-mm ZAK “Vulkan-Falanks” MK 15 of the General Dynamics company (two on the LHD-5-7), four 25-mm AC Mk 38 (three on the LHD-5-7), four 12,7- mm machine gun.
    EW / REP facilities: four or six six-barreled launchers for the Mk 36 SRB0C false target setting system of the Loral Highcor company, SLQ-25 Nixi sonar counters, Sea Gnat false targets, AN / SLQ-49 buoyed false targets , EW system AN / SLQ-32.
    REV: radar - OVTS AN / SPS-52 (or -48) and AN / SPS-49, OHUAN / SPS-67, navigation and firing control, receiver URN-25 of the TACAN radio navigation system.


    Ships of the Wasp type (Wasp) are landing ships that provide the US Navy with unprecedented capabilities to attack the coast of the enemy anywhere in the world. The ships of this series were the largest ships of this type in the world until the advent of the universal landing ship (UDC) of the "America" ​​type. They were also the first to be specifically designed for combat use with both the AV-8B attack aircraft and the LCAC hovercraft.
  6. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 14 January 2018 15: 58
    +1
    visited the port of the US base Sasebo in the Japanese prefecture of Nagasaki
    The deployment of the UDC in Japan has already caused concern in Pyongyang, which sees in it the threat of a landing on its coast.

    Eun jerked in vain, because. Sasebo is close to the DPRK. Although the call of such a ship to its base is an ordinary matter, and North Korean concern is only an element of information warfare.
    Sosebo - The foremost naval base of the US naval forces, the naval base of Japan, an important center of the shipbuilding and ship repair industry of this country. Today, mainly Japanese anti-submarine ships are built and repaired here. At the same time, American equipment is being repaired and docked. The geographical position of naval bases creates the conditions for the operations of warships in the Japanese and East China Seas, as well as for the control of communications passing through the Korean Strait to the western Pacific Ocean. During World War II, Sosebo was one of the main operational bases of the Japanese Navy. And later, especially during the conduct of hostilities in Korea and Vietnam, he played the role of the most important transshipment base for the supply of the US armed forces. Now here, besides the warships of the USA and Japan, American ammunition, weapons and fuel depots are located.
    nvo.ng.ru/notes/2006-06-30/8_sasebo.html
  7. Herculesic
    Herculesic 14 January 2018 16: 10
    +1
    This ship will creep in, bring some kind of trick in the form of a chemical or nuclear weapon, and the crazy Trump will decide to conduct a “quick little war”, and will arrange a planetary fire that cannot be extinguished! !!
  8. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 14 January 2018 19: 43
    +3
    The_lancet,
    Lancet, you're not even funny ALREADY. You are dumb. Or just at work. Your "arguments" are a discredit on your "stupidity" or obstinacy in the execution of the order)))
  9. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)
    Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 15 January 2018 17: 50
    0
    In the comments, the strategic cap forces of the Russian Federation give battle to the American aggressors, it’s expensive to watch