Military Review

"Krasnopol" in action: video of the destruction of militants who shot at Hamim

55
The terrorists responsible for the shelling of the Russian airbase in Hmeimim 31 last December, destroyed. This was reported by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


According to the official statement of the military department, thanks to the involvement of all types of multi-level intelligence, it was possible to establish the location of the enemy’s sabotage group. When the militants landed on a bus near the object of their home, the Krasnopol high-precision artillery ammunition was hit. The whole group was destroyed.

Also in the province Idlib exploration was discovered production workshop engaged in the manufacture of unmanned aerial vehicles. Such UAVs made an attempt to attack the Russian army at the Khmeimim airbase on the night of 5 on January 6. After confirming the information, the factory was destroyed with high-precision projectile.

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation published a video of the liquidation of a group of terrorists and a workshop.



55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tatyana
    Tatyana 12 January 2018 20: 26
    +3
    In the video, 6 people in the enemy sabotage group and those who were in their evacuation bus were killed by an exact hit!
    1. passerby5
      passerby5 13 January 2018 10: 22
      11
      Remember how Hayali Kadyrov was when he said that the relatives of the militants needed "". Sidid son in the forest, makes sorties, kills civilians and the military. and in the evenings, his mother calls him: son, are you good, are you well fed, are you good, are you good? when will you come for groceries? whether to put money on the phone, because there are no terminals in the forest .... you think it’s different there. A secret is when 1 person knows about it. so here it’s like it or not: wood chips are flying. neher to disassemble who agreed there to cover them with his ass
  2. assa67
    assa67 12 January 2018 20: 31
    11
    BEAUTY! ..... I would also add vigilance so that the "New Year" state of emergency would not be repeated .....
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 12 January 2018 20: 43
      10
      Quote: assa67
      BEAUTY! ..... I would also add vigilance so that the "New Year" state of emergency would not be repeated .....

      Our servicemen from the Russian Air Force in Syria need to remember, re-learn and apply the Afghan combat experience of guarding Soviet military facilities of the USSR Armed Forces in the fight against partisan sabotage of radical militants in Afghanistan.
      1. Shahno
        Shahno 12 January 2018 20: 49
        +1
        Here I completely agree with you.
        And do not try to justify the destruction of the allegedly involved gang of militants.
        1. Vladimir K.
          Vladimir K. 13 January 2018 08: 14
          +6
          How are your doubts about involvement in the shelling of the Russian base of the destroyed group reinforced? I understand that our military could have been deceiving, having destroyed someone else, but, of course, I do not have accurate data on this.
        2. pistolero pistolero
          pistolero pistolero 13 January 2018 08: 57
          0
          Well, if you agree, then go there and watch
          1. Captain Nemo
            Captain Nemo 13 January 2018 11: 50
            +1
            Have you forgotten the Russian language, son?
      2. free_flier
        free_flier 13 January 2018 20: 02
        +1
        alas, we are already over 60 ... the experience was only on paper.
    2. Artek
      Artek 12 January 2018 22: 35
      0
      why such a filthy resolution that they hide?
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 13 January 2018 10: 22
        +6
        There was not a film studio filming a drone. The main thing is to fix the hit, and not to show you a beautiful picture.
        1. chicken 96
          chicken 96 13 January 2018 10: 24
          0
          Only the editing is already rough on the first video. Are they saving traffic ?, or are there not enough films?
      2. Anatoly R
        Anatoly R 13 January 2018 17: 01
        0
        See the image. The main fact.
    3. Anatoly R
      Anatoly R 13 January 2018 17: 13
      0
      assa67 - I think there was enough vigilance. Dushmans work on American technology. The first strike is reconnaissance, and if it goes smoothly, then it is possible to strike fully. But ours, too, know this and type miss, find out what, how and where, and then ironed.
  3. Shahno
    Shahno 12 January 2018 20: 37
    +1
    Well that destroyed. But communication with the militants who fired at the base does not prove this. It's clear. And your MO could not understand this. Where is the evidence of communication, if such bold statements?
    1. Dym71
      Dym71 12 January 2018 20: 48
      +4
      Quote: Shahno
      Where is the evidence of communication, if such bold statements?

      What evidence will convince you? How is this done, for example, in Israel?
      (I ask you to consider that I will not believe anything, even my eyes, I will argue that the Israelites are dashing illusionists wassat )
      Here's how this one for example:
    2. Observer2014
      Observer2014 12 January 2018 20: 48
      +6
      Shahno
      Well that destroyed. But communication with the militants who fired at the base does not prove this. It's clear. And your MO could not understand this. Where is the evidence of communication, if such bold statements?
      You have learned. You need proof, go and collect what is left there.
      1. Shahno
        Shahno 12 January 2018 20: 54
        0
        I see that study.
    3. dog breeder
      dog breeder 12 January 2018 20: 49
      +8
      I have not seen on your part evidence of various kinds of your successful attacks or refutation of successful attacks on your targets.
      1. Shahno
        Shahno 12 January 2018 20: 58
        0
        But the IDF never gives specifics without evidence.
    4. Tatyana
      Tatyana 12 January 2018 20: 50
      +8
      Pavel! In such a case, not all evidence can be given. Indeed, concrete people are behind this evidence - their information and intelligence agents among local residents! Who will give out their names for all to see ?!
      1. Shahno
        Shahno 12 January 2018 20: 53
        0
        I understand perfectly. Then it’s better to say nothing at all.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 12 January 2018 21: 00
          +5
          Shahno
          I understand perfectly. Then it’s better to say nothing at all.

          Pavel! You are not right.
          At first. The RF Ministry of Defense knows this for sure, that's why they say so! And in vain in this case you do not believe the statement of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation! Very much in vain!
          And secondly, it’s necessary to talk about it! For others to be discouraged!
          1. Shahno
            Shahno 12 January 2018 21: 12
            +2
            Good. I will support you. Let it be discouraging. But I do not believe it. Time will tell...
    5. vrazhin
      vrazhin 13 January 2018 07: 06
      +3
      And no one is going to prove anything to you or anyone.
      Whoever needs it will understand that an attack on Russian targets is punishable by death.
      This is the tactics of your Mossad. Is not it?
  4. polpot
    polpot 12 January 2018 20: 52
    +1
    Find and kill our answer to the terrorists
  5. assa67
    assa67 12 January 2018 21: 07
    +7
    Quote: polpot
    Find and kill our answer to the terrorists

    here I agree ... maybe under a hot hand and those will fall .... "soak in the toilet" .... soldier .... the rest there and the road
  6. gorgo
    gorgo 12 January 2018 22: 28
    +2
    Are there any specialists with experience here who can explain? Well, how does this usually happen? A few days ago, some UAVs arrived, bombed ... They were shot down. No, I'm just interested. It is just an apparatus in the sky. Well, suppose some means allow you to find the place where it was piloted from (what?) ... What, some kind of task force immediately moved to that place? Someone spotted? Or are there any agents introduced into the militant environment? Or locals sifted through, who could do this? How could it be determined who exactly and where did this sabotage come from, theoretically?
    The fact that they bombed Krasnopole - I'm glad, really. But ... Edak can show such a video and comment that this is the destruction of ... anyone.
    I apologize, but somehow it really looks like it's just an attempt to blur the error in the defense of the Khmeimim base, which missed that attack. Here we are, they say, called up ... Well, this is no offense.
    1. assa67
      assa67 13 January 2018 01: 38
      +6
      I think we’ll wait a bit .... we need to pass the instructors over the puddle .... until the coffins arrive
    2. Vadim Kurbatov
      Vadim Kurbatov 13 January 2018 05: 30
      +2
      Well, a multi-level intelligence has been written on this, it is possible that by past the wiretapping of the frequencies of the militants of the introduced agents and the small bribing of various gouging from the midst of terrorists, and in terms of UAVs, it’s possible that with the help of various buns, we were able to track where these fighters were controlled from
    3. vrazhin
      vrazhin 13 January 2018 07: 14
      +1
      There is only one means, but it is true and will always be used, despite the development of technical intelligence tools. AGENT Intelligence. This data can only be obtained through agents.
      Well, there are many ways to create an agent network. This and personnel intelligence and sympathizers and bribery and blackmail.
      Finally, accurate data can be obtained from the persons involved by using the most ancient intelligence technology - torture.
      By any technical means this kind of information will not be obtained. And do not drizzle here, about radio intercepts. Such information on the air, whatever it is, is not shared
      1. Anatoly R
        Anatoly R 13 January 2018 16: 56
        +1
        That's about all kinds of different radio intercepts ... So already in the 1970s, all this was done brilliantly, and now even more so. At that time, household conversations in houses were even recorded from satellites.
    4. m.cempbell
      m.cempbell 13 January 2018 07: 19
      +3
      Tracking UAV control is just a small problem. There is such a thing as "frequency bearing" ... in general, technically it is not very difficult. But as for the video - I see a group of people (even barmalei) that the shell destroys. I don’t see the DRG, I don’t see that they are armed, I don’t see any evidence that these are the people who fired at our base. In general, I doubt that the base was fired on December 31. Why did they allegedly call a "scalpel", but in fact turned out to be a civilian side? Why didn’t he sit down, but flew back? Why is it already January 4th? Solid "why" ... something was unclean on that base and they tried to disguise it ...
    5. passerby5
      passerby5 13 January 2018 10: 30
      +1
      Yes, even so, the main thing is to know, it will certainly arrive. if they aren’t like us, so it’s really bad to run around with guns))) live peacefully, dig the earth, plant tangerines. and if something, someone there you sometimes do not want to live in peace, quickly inform. there they recognize the power .. and here it is necessary to show it
    6. Ilya_Nsk
      Ilya_Nsk 13 January 2018 13: 30
      +2
      Intelligence has its own methods. Part of the UAV was not shot down, but landed and disassembled to the cog in an attempt to find out the origin. After such a slap in the face, the MO got out of the skin, chemical analyzes of explosives (by the way, do not cook such in the kitchen), etc. They strained all their agents, "one grandmother said," they took into account .. A thread was found somewhere, it was pulled - that’s the result. Although I'm not sure that destroyed exactly action movies. They could cover a group of civilians and give out the left house as a production factory. After all, nothing can be seen on the frames ... Well, they declared and declared. Let the lie, if it takes place, remain on their conscience ... But if this is true, then those wishing to repeat the attack will sharply decrease
      1. Shahno
        Shahno 13 January 2018 13: 51
        +2
        This is of course to intimidate and to show, here, they say, punishment. And Krasnopol was added for a stronger accent (rather an undermining), they say, we can do it anyway. And most likely, these are not those fighters .. Still, I think the fighters.
        What is the most interesting and more important. This is part of the information war. And most importantly, another defense circuit can help save the life of the Russian military.
    7. Mar.Tirah
      Mar.Tirah 13 January 2018 15: 33
      +1
      Well, actually they destroyed the mortar crew’s combat calculations, which had previously fired at the airbase. For some reason, why did the authors of the publication not supplement this?
    8. Valery Saitov
      Valery Saitov 15 January 2018 07: 45
      +2
      You watch NTV on weekends (Russian weapons), they just tell you something and show how intelligence works, what means are used (space intelligence, etc.) And then the GDP gives them awards in the Kremlin (you think he will believe it or demand it evidence?). They showed how they found and destroyed Dushmans (everything was filmed on camera) that bombed a field hospital (our girls died). As snipers ringleaders calculate (by their mobile phones) and destroy.
  7. 452336
    452336 12 January 2018 22: 52
    +1
    Handsomely. Sniper hit.
    Questions.
    In what part of the world was the video shot?
    Why is there no cyrillic on the monitor?
    How is the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry better than the yellow Kommersant?
    How long will they hold us for suckers?
    1. 73petia
      73petia 13 January 2018 03: 00
      +7
      More attentively. Cyrillic on the monitor just is.
      1. vrazhin
        vrazhin 13 January 2018 07: 22
        +2
        And for what purpose are you interested in?
        You have been notified, thank you and tell me.
        No one is obligated to explain anything to you.
        And the operation was carried out in order to intimidate the persons involved in the attack. They, without any evidence, know how, where, and whom ... and they know that after attacks on objects of the Russian Federation they will die.
    2. Dyagilev
      Dyagilev 13 January 2018 13: 53
      +1
      MO for the militants this video showed, and you already slander yourself.
      1. free_flier
        free_flier 13 January 2018 20: 10
        +2
        most likely does not slander, but tries on.
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. Mountain shooter
      Mountain shooter 13 January 2018 07: 45
      +3
      Wrong address? So go out into the street, and "beat the Jews, save Russia." If you find. Almost everyone left. Back in the 90s. What happens in people’s head?
      1. passerby5
        passerby5 13 January 2018 10: 34
        +1
        Are you sure you left?
    2. Captain Nemo
      Captain Nemo 13 January 2018 11: 56
      +3
      My dear, you wouldn’t have exposed yourself as a clown. It is not necessary to mow under the Old Russian language. Are you baptizing yourself with two fingers, schismatic?
  9. Ilya_Nsk
    Ilya_Nsk 13 January 2018 13: 33
    0
    It was necessary not to "Krasnopol", and "Centimeter" horseradish, it would be cheaper ..
    1. free_flier
      free_flier 13 January 2018 20: 26
      +3
      There are not so many such b / ps (in view of the futility of attempts to conduct a conventional combined arms battle with their help). Their use is just that. found a distant target and soaked (previously with the help of a spotter, now UAVs), Krasnopoli is more ancient, and all weapons have storage periods, I saw their first test at the training ground in the early 80s ... The first shell is exactly like a cross, the rest are for fumes and dust is not at all like the first ...
  10. capt4net
    capt4net 13 January 2018 21: 09
    0
    Quote: 452336
    Why is there no cyrillic on the monitor?


    Is “And” Latin or Glagolitic?
  11. tecnik
    tecnik 14 January 2018 16: 27
    +1
    But in the video with the destruction of a group of militants, Mikrik really has signs of gluing. The dark spot on the right in the frame (a car or something) moved simultaneously with the explosion to the top of the frame. And obviously not from the effects of explosives.
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 14 January 2018 16: 34
      +1
      Quote: tecnik
      But in the video with the destruction of a group of militants, Mikrik really has signs of gluing. The dark spot on the right in the frame (a car or something) moved simultaneously with the explosion to the top of the frame. And obviously not from the effects of explosives.
      Most likely, that car was thrown back by a blast wave before a dust cloud ..
  12. Dimmih
    Dimmih 14 January 2018 18: 27
    +1
    Doubts overwhelm me about the first video. The essence of the matter is-read about Krasnopol on the Wiki. The artillery shell is adjustable. Look, how could it be calculated that a group of militants at some point in time would rush into the bus and at that moment Krasnopol was on the way? This is not a missile from a drone, it must be launched / fired from a gun in advance. As far as I can see, the bus was either mined or fucked up with something else. Someone explicitly or wrongly sinned with the description for the video. With regards to the belief in the messages of our MO ..... I remember from a computer game the frames were presented to us as something else. Doubts, dear, doubts gnaw.
    1. Whisper
      Whisper 16 January 2018 01: 47
      0
      Yes, there the score went for a split second, and then the "Krasnopol" flew in. And if they arrived 10 seconds later, would they leave and show us nothing?
      More like luck, or really a land mine, with a detonation through a drone.
  13. tTshka
    tTshka 15 January 2018 02: 14
    0
    It’s interesting that the conchitas are in such a hurry, that the bus didn’t cover with the first “shot” or, nevertheless, the Allies merged the information ... after all, at least at the last moment, we are sharing the information with them
  14. Ivan Hangoverov
    Ivan Hangoverov 15 January 2018 15: 19
    0
    1. Our MO is already caught in a lie - they published an American video, posing as their own. T.O. their "evidence" must be divided by 10.
    Once lied, who will believe you?
    74th aphorism from the collection of thoughts and aphorisms “Fruits of Meditation” (1854) by Kozma Prutkov.
    2. It seems to me there is a gluing. The drone noticed the group - after some time (after an hour?) For example, they fired. Perhaps none of the barmalei died.