Military Review

US and 16 more countries gathered to intercept the court for violation of sanctions against the DPRK

143
Seventeen countries, including the United States, reaffirmed their intention to intercept ships and cargo that violate the sanctions against the DPRK, from the corresponding statement in support of UN Security Council resolutions 2375 and 2397.


US and 16 more countries gathered to intercept the court for violation of sanctions against the DPRK


Countries undertake to conduct inspections on the high seas and, if necessary, to send suspected ships to their ports. Also, these countries will prohibit in their jurisdiction to transfer goods that were loaded from vessels trading with the DPRK. In addition, they pledged to destroy any intercepted cargo that violates UN sanctions.

The statement was signed by Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, USA, France, South Korea and Japan.

The UN Security Council has repeatedly tightened sanctions against North Korea in 2017 due to Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile program. According to the US, the ban turned up to 90% of North Korean exports.

Earlier, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un said that the DPRK will not experience difficulties even if "the enemies impose sanctions on 10 and 100 years."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
143 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. SRC P-15
    SRC P-15 12 January 2018 18: 47 New
    10
    Something tells me that these vessels will accompany North Korean submarines.
    1. Black_Vatnik
      Black_Vatnik 12 January 2018 18: 49 New
      24
      I smell the new trials of Ynovsky toys)

      A purely rhetorical question. Greece has enough fuel to send its interceptors to the shores of the DPRK?)
      1. figwam
        figwam 12 January 2018 18: 54 New
        20
        The statement was signed by Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, USA, France, South Korea and Japan.

        The pro-Western Caudle in full force.
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 12 January 2018 18: 58 New
          10
          Quote: figvam
          The pro-Western Caudle in full force.

          It's time for Eunu to redirect the flight of his missiles towards Europe!
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 12 January 2018 19: 00 New
            14
            In addition, they pledged to DESTROY any intercepted cargo that violates UN sanctions.
            I don’t believe in it! Just under the UN shop with its decision against the DPRK, these countries
            Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, USA, France, South Korea and Japan.
            they simply will pirate DPRK and other countries. And at the same time they will only get a taste!
            Well, for example, who will it be from these countries that the oil and gas seized for the DPRK will be destroyed? Yes, nobody!

            TOTAL In this case, there can be no talk of a political settlement on their part of these countries! Correctly about this in this regard - the inefficiency of economic sanctions against the UDRP - Russia and China declared at the UN!

            REFERENCE
            According to the resolution, new UN restrictions include:
            - a ban on the purchase of North Korean textiles;
            a ban on the supply of gas condensates to the DPRK;
            - restrictions on export to North Korea of ​​oil and its refined products
            (volumes should not exceed figures for the past 12 months).
            - A ban on issuing new work permits for North Korean citizens
            search on the high seas of ships suspected of breaking the embargo against the DPRK.
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 19: 26 New
              27
              Quote: Tatiana
              they simply will pirate DPRK and other countries.

              A privateer certificate signed and stamped by the UN, huh? wink
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 12 January 2018 19: 35 New
                +7
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                Quote: Tatiana
                they simply will pirate DPRK and other countries.

                A privateer certificate signed and stamped by the UN, huh? wink

                Right, Paul! No wonder these sanctions at the United Nations were promoted by the Anglo-Saxons in the person of the USA !!!
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 19: 39 New
                  14
                  Well, we didn’t just pass the story at school, we remember it. yes Arrogant Saxons, it seems - too. At least as regards the banditry of their ancestors.
                  1. Going
                    Going 12 January 2018 20: 24 New
                    +5
                    One thing is clear, everyone expects to get their own gesheft out of this.
                    1. bouncyhunter
                      bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 20: 26 New
                      +7
                      Scavengers are always averse to making money. negative
                      1. Going
                        Going 12 January 2018 20: 34 New
                        +8
                        Well, yes, and essentially return piracy, okay?
                    2. bouncyhunter
                      bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 20: 38 New
                      +9
                      Quote: Going
                      Well, yes, and essentially return piracy, okay?

                      But the arrogant Saxons are not interested in moral issues. It was not without reason that I recalled above the gangster past of many eminent families of Small Britain. And already their offspring found fertile ground for the continuation of the family craft in North America and Australia.
                      1. Going
                        Going 12 January 2018 20: 40 New
                        +4
                        We’ll go so far, then it will be difficult to eradicate.
                      2. MadCat
                        MadCat 12 January 2018 21: 09 New
                        +3
                        Quote: bouncyhunter
                        But the arrogant Saxons are not interested in moral issues. It was not without reason that I recalled above the gangster past of many eminent families of Small Britain. And already their offspring found fertile ground for the continuation of the family craft in North America and Australia.

                        Funny, compliance with the UN resolution to which Russia signed the "immoral", yeah.
                  2. bouncyhunter
                    bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 20: 45 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Going
                    We’ll go so far, then it will be difficult to eradicate.

                    Vitya, and from these exceptional and so sickly Augean stables ...
                    1. Going
                      Going 12 January 2018 20: 51 New
                      +5
                      And again, we all rake.
                  3. The black
                    The black 12 January 2018 21: 19 New
                    +2
                    If Svidomo had its own fleet, they would also sign up. wassat .... And so ... eh, misfortune did not succeed unclean uncle Sam to lick laughing
                    1. the most important
                      the most important 13 January 2018 00: 27 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Black
                      If Svidomo had its own fleet, they would also sign up. .... And so ... eh, misfortune did not succeed unclean uncle Sam to lick

                      It would be fat there, they would rush to drown it in rowboats ...
              2. Smog
                Smog 12 January 2018 19: 50 New
                +7
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                UN Private Signature and Seal

                Pasha! You count. They outdid Edward I ......... One involuntarily recalls the proverb - everything is new, this is a well-forgotten old .....
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 19: 56 New
                  +6
                  Kostya, yes, many romance of a knife and an ax spinning with envy in coffins. yes
                  1. Smog
                    Smog 12 January 2018 20: 08 New
                    +4
                    Pasha! Lisa IAlready in touch ......
                  2. albert
                    albert 13 January 2018 18: 10 New
                    0
                    Actually, it’s not a laughing matter. What will we do if our ships intercept? Are we wiping ourselves again? Or shoot for defeat, so that it would be disgraceful another time?
              3. Warrior-80
                Warrior-80 12 January 2018 23: 46 New
                +9
                Tell me honestly, are you on a paycheck at a site or just a fan, I don’t want to offend you, you’re always and everywhere
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 13 January 2018 08: 51 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Warrior-80
                  are you on the payroll site or just a fan

                  "I do not take bribes - it’s a shame for the state" (c)
              4. DEDPIHTO
                DEDPIHTO 13 January 2018 05: 47 New
                +1
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                Quote: Tatiana
                they simply will pirate DPRK and other countries.

                A privateer certificate signed and stamped by the UN, huh? wink

                In Somalia, guests should be expected, they will go to learn the pirate experience .. they have lost their experience over the centuries, and they ate the campaign .. lol
            2. mig29mks
              mig29mks 12 January 2018 20: 23 New
              0
              a ban on issuing new work permits for North Korean citizens; that is, in this case, the workers from the DPRK will be counted as the goods to be destroyed?
            3. Mih1974
              Mih1974 13 January 2018 00: 59 New
              +3
              I would have straightened my hands for a moment showing off under the camera to hold a couple of oil tankers in the DPRK, accompanied by some of our attack ships (and more more) good repeat .
              And the report on TV would charge something like "Russia breaks through the blockade of the DPRK as when the USSR broke through the blockade of Cuba" laughing good
              1. Viktor.12.71
                Viktor.12.71 13 January 2018 07: 32 New
                0
                What kind of blockade? When did you look at a map?
              2. Korax71
                Korax71 13 January 2018 07: 34 New
                0
                Eh.you would be in the government. Here the international image of the country would be raised. Even Stalin did not think of this in 1950.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. MadCat
            MadCat 12 January 2018 21: 12 New
            +2
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            It's time for Eunu to redirect the flight of his missiles towards Europe!

            Soon there, in addition to these missiles, there will be nothing to eat, and everyone has got used to its quacks and scare very few. Eun is not quite a fool, he knows very well that if something happens he will be erased into dust.
            1. tolmachiev51
              tolmachiev51 13 January 2018 04: 35 New
              +3
              it's you somehow in vain !!! the main "washer" twitched, but realized that he himself could row to the fullest, and this was what they were most afraid of !!! This is not Iraq and Libya with corrupt leaders; Koreans cannot be bought for money.
              1. Korax71
                Korax71 13 January 2018 07: 36 New
                0
                It may not be raking, but the allies in the person of South Korea and Japan for sure.
          4. Shkodnick
            Shkodnick 13 January 2018 13: 33 New
            0
            And they will have to fly through our territories, as I understand you are an adrenaline lover or are you sure of the build quality?
        2. olegglin
          olegglin 12 January 2018 19: 05 New
          +6
          Patent for piracy.
          1. Smog
            Smog 12 January 2018 20: 09 New
            +5
            Quote: olegglin
            Patent for piracy.

            Tolerant Frenchmen called this privateering.
            1. Going
              Going 12 January 2018 20: 25 New
              +6
              No matter how it all came around. Kostya hi
              1. Smog
                Smog 12 January 2018 23: 03 New
                +1
                Quote: Going
                No matter how it all came around

                Vitya, do you think Eunushka can aim her rackets in the other direction? Che, he studied tea in Switzerland. He knows how to behave with the bourgeois
                1. Cutter
                  Cutter 12 January 2018 23: 59 New
                  +2
                  hi hi hi But no, gentlemen! hi Eun was tricked, made his nuclear program "quietly", and now "put up" ... BUT now his missiles with nuclear warheads will reach almost any point in the USA ... THERE AND YOU! Now let's hold the Olympic Games when I have a nuclear baton !!!! repeat As for safety, there is a feeling-do not pull the lion’s tail ... you won’t get back a FEET !!!!
          2. birs
            birs 13 January 2018 09: 00 New
            +1
            I wonder how it can be proved that the ship is sailing to the DPRK, and not sailing past. How to prove that it is going to trade with the DPRK, and not refuel there at the port? How to prove that the goods shipped to the DPRK will not transit further to another country by land, but are intended specifically for the DPRK? Because without evidence, this is just a robbery on the road. Western elite is degrading, even if it offers something like that.
            1. Brylevsky
              Brylevsky 13 January 2018 11: 03 New
              +1
              Quote: birs
              I wonder how it can be proved that the ship is sailing to the DPRK, and not sailing past. How to prove that it is going to trade with the DPRK, and not refuel there at the port? How to prove that the goods shipped to the DPRK will not transit further to another country by land, but are intended specifically for the DPRK?

              Prove elementary. On freight bills of lading. These are accompanying documents for the cargo on board the ship. They indicate the consignor and consignee. On the ship itself, the cargo assistant captain stores cargo manifests issued to the captain of the stevedoring company. They have about the same info. Fooling someone other than themselves will fail.
        3. iliitchitch
          iliitchitch 12 January 2018 19: 07 New
          0
          Quote: figvam
          The pro-Western Caudle in full force.

          Well, in someone else's pockets, oh, how to rummage around hunting. Bad Boy what’s there, plutonium carries, eh? He will be provided with airplanes. So that you, contraceptives, have a piston on your ass. A fly in a soup, a clerical button on a stool - that's all he is, Eun. You are Ukrainians, we are a descendant of the Great Helmsman. And this is still noble of us.
        4. mihey
          mihey 12 January 2018 19: 10 New
          +2
          not in full: there are not enough Baltic states with ukrams, at least.
          1. figwam
            figwam 12 January 2018 19: 17 New
            +5
            mihey

            They did not take them, so as not to scare them with their sea power.
            1. Metallurg_2
              Metallurg_2 12 January 2018 20: 31 New
              +1
              And the rodents forgot)))
        5. Pirogov
          Pirogov 12 January 2018 19: 17 New
          +6
          Quote: figvam
          The pro-Western Caudle in full force.

          Club hyenas. The worst thing is that Russia helps them in this matter. supporting sanctions in the DPRK.
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 13 January 2018 02: 35 New
            0
            Quote: Pirogov
            The worst thing is that Russia helps them in this matter. supporting sanctions in the DPRK.

            Russia supports sanctions, only in the field of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. On other sanctions issues, Russia did not sign and does not support.
        6. universe1
          universe1 12 January 2018 21: 44 New
          0
          Ukraine is not enough.
        7. Slovak
          Slovak 12 January 2018 22: 11 New
          +1
          Russia borders on S. Korea and has common territorial waters, where only their ships can go, and where anyone else can be destroyed. How and who can stop and inspect something? Or do the Bastions not work?
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 13 January 2018 02: 39 New
            0
            Quote: Slovak
            How and who can stop and inspect something?

            And so, with them it will become. It just seems to me that to stop a ship sailing under a neutral flag, to take cargo, even with the sanction of some kind of UN, is outright piracy. They want to put pressure on North Korea, let them declare war, but no, the gut is thin. Jackals in one word.
        8. igorka357
          igorka357 12 January 2018 23: 49 New
          0
          It’s true, Kodla .. among all these mongrels only two meant something in the history of the planet .. Germany with its third Reich and Britain ..!
        9. Orionvit
          Orionvit 13 January 2018 02: 32 New
          0
          Quote: figvam
          The pro-Western Caudle in full force.

          The first to sign Ukraine and the unfinished Baltic states. Strange, usually the states will not have time to voice their position, like these helpful hares, right there. Oh, this opportunity to bend in front of the owner missed.
        10. Ren
          Ren 13 January 2018 05: 52 New
          +2
          Quote: figvam
          The pro-Western Caudle in full force.

          Yes, it's just the henchmen of the United States, or simpler:
          ГGermany
          АAustralia
          Вuk,
          Нorgy,
          ЮSouth Korea
          Кanada
          Иwaist lol
        11. weksha50
          weksha50 13 January 2018 10: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: figvam
          The pro-Western Caudle in full force.


          Ukraine, Georgia and the Baltic states are not enough .... Or didn’t the remaining coders react in time? laughing
      2. 210ox
        210ox 12 January 2018 19: 08 New
        +3
        Goryuchka is not enough. But to express puppy fidelity to his master at the time. The main thing is that we are not there ..
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        I smell the new trials of Ynovsky toys)

        A purely rhetorical question. Greece has enough fuel to send its interceptors to the shores of the DPRK?)
      3. Kent0001
        Kent0001 12 January 2018 20: 57 New
        0
        ... they’ll go on pidals. Db. Okay, the amers deferred the Greeks and other brethren counted. I can imagine how Greek pedal boats will intercept a Chinese tanker .. well, or ours.
      4. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 12 January 2018 21: 12 New
        +1
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        I smell the new trials of Ynovsky toys)

        A purely rhetorical question. Greece has enough fuel to send its interceptors to the shores of the DPRK?)


        Greece even has a long tradition of seafaring) But Poland is where it climbs ??? Or the Netherlands? ))))
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit 13 January 2018 02: 42 New
          0
          Quote: Geisenberg
          Greece at least has a long tradition of seafaring

          Yeah, no further than the Mediterranean Sea, or even closer, the Aegean. laughing The same to me, conquerors of the oceans.
      5. igorka357
        igorka357 12 January 2018 23: 46 New
        0
        Greece will definitely have enough, and if we give them anything, since Greece is our ally .. and I don’t have to carry about NAT here ..!
        1. albert
          albert 13 January 2018 18: 14 New
          0
          Quote: igorka357
          Greece will definitely have enough, and if we give them anything, since Greece is our ally .. and I don’t have to carry about NAT here ..!

          To whom is Greece an ally?! To us?! When did the Greeks become allies of Russia? belay belay belay
      6. Brylevsky
        Brylevsky 13 January 2018 05: 12 New
        +2
        From the Mediterranean to the Japanese, no, not enough. What for? The bunker for the Greek frigate can be taken quite normally in Singapore, then replenished in Busan ... what's your irony? If the state decides to send its ship to foreign shores, it will find a way to do this. In extreme cases, the ship will take fuel from the supply vessel of one of the NATO countries, of which there are enough in the oceans. Like seaports where you can do this.
        1. Black_Vatnik
          Black_Vatnik 13 January 2018 12: 51 New
          0
          With humor and irony quite tight?
          1. Brylevsky
            Brylevsky 13 January 2018 13: 07 New
            0
            Sorry, I should have understood that you were joking.
      7. Alex_Rarog
        Alex_Rarog 14 January 2018 10: 17 New
        0
        The Greeks, unfortunately, now have to put a signature under any piece of paper ... for they drove them into bondage for a long time.
    2. Smog
      Smog 12 January 2018 18: 51 New
      +3
      And based on this postulate
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      these vessels will accompany North Korean submarines.

      it is not yet clear who will “destroy” the cargo ..... Question, ....
      1. Going
        Going 12 January 2018 20: 26 New
        +6
        Destroy through the sale of new documents, even children understand this.
    3. Esoteric
      Esoteric 12 January 2018 18: 54 New
      +2
      Quote: SRC P-15
      Something tells me that these vessels will accompany North Korean submarines.

      Something tells me it's time to conduct exercises on the coherence of the RTO KZ KZ.
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 12 January 2018 18: 54 New
      0
      Intercepting ships is a useless number. They will not poke into the border zone, and the flag on the trough can be changed without problems. lol
      1. Rusland
        Rusland 12 January 2018 19: 14 New
        +9
        Argentina is what is brought into this gadyushnik.
      2. Brylevsky
        Brylevsky 13 January 2018 05: 40 New
        +1
        Comrade, do you have any idea what you're talking about? What do you think "change the flag"? Replace the banner on the flagpole from one to another? Well, then I will disappoint you: this is not quite so. More precisely, this is not so at all. If it was possible to change the “banners” on the ship as easily as you change your socks, then the shipowner would not have such a hemorrhoid procedure as the “re-reflashing procedure”. Do you have a car? You can travel on it with fake documents for a long time? As Kiselyov says: “I don’t think so.” With a ship everything is more complicated. If only because there is a single global database of all commercial vessels, access to which all states have access to. Before entering any port, the captain of any vessel sends there a full report on the vessel, cargo and crew by e-mail. Among other things, there is infa about the flag of the ship. The administration of the portal of entry checks all the information on the database, and woe will be to the captain if they find in his immediate mistake.
        1. Brylevsky
          Brylevsky 13 January 2018 05: 46 New
          +1
          This t9 bothers me: to read "the administration of the port of call" and "woe to the captain if they find an error in his report."
    5. Vanin
      Vanin 12 January 2018 19: 20 New
      +8
      Quote: SRC P-15
      Something tells me that these vessels will accompany North Korean submarines.

      There is no sense in it .. Nobody will touch the DPRK, but all this hype began in the USA over the threat of their "milk cows" of South Korea and Japan! After all, these countries (very rich) are actually slaves of the United States, they are robots, stampers, powerless completely unlike the "poor" and proud North Koreans, who will soon be in space and have everything for this (yes, they do not live richly, but independently) )) That's for this, I respect the Korean people of the DPRK!
      1. Korax71
        Korax71 13 January 2018 12: 55 New
        0
        Well, here we are. So you have countries with developed industry and a normal standard of living, they are powerless. How did they achieve everything then ???? and the DPRK was always independent ???? I beg you. If it weren’t for China and the USSR and there wouldn’t be any war. well, and even if it did, it would end very badly for the DPRK. But they’re not rich in terms of life. Well, probably. You won’t be overclocked for $ 4 (average salary 6000 pts.) there is. at one time a small but proud DPRK, during my famine in the 90s they organized the sending of humanitarian aid. there are actually no completely independent countries. They have been tied to each other for a long time.
        1. Vanin
          Vanin 13 January 2018 13: 38 New
          +3
          Quote: Korax71
          Well, here we are. So you have countries with developed industry and a normal standard of living, they have no rights. How did they achieve everything then ????

          hehe Well we already know this term "standard of living .." ..
          Quote: Korax71
          I beg you. if it weren’t for China and the USSR, then there wouldn’t be any war. well, and even if it was, it ended very badly for the DPRK.

          No need to beg, we’ll get along somehow ..)))) As your people like not to argue against the fact, the DPRK is a nuclear power and is still tearing into space! he he
          Quote: Korax71
          There are actually no completely independent countries. All have long been tied to each other.

          Well here you may be right! DPRK is independent of the United States and other world money-lenders .. Here Russia so far cannot boast of this, alas, but we are striving for this .. And we support the DPRK as much as we can ..!
          These are the things in the tank troops, on the border of the west .. soldier
    6. kirgiz58
      kirgiz58 12 January 2018 22: 09 New
      0
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      Something tells me that these vessels will accompany North Korean submarines.

      Why accompany them? All ships from Vladik to the territorial waters of Russia and immediately to the territorial waters of S. Korea. Who will an outsider enter these waters? Slightly correct the logistics. Well, the second aspect; China will have fewer competitors in trade with S. Korea - no one can wool a piece of iron. It will come out more expensive for Koreans, but you will have to overpay for vital things.
  2. Rusland
    Rusland 12 January 2018 18: 47 New
    10
    Everything is on land. We found something for everyone.
    1. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 12 January 2018 18: 55 New
      18
      Chinese smugglers on this occasion have taken on increased social obligations, Russian joyfully tore two button accordions! laughing
      1. Polite Moose
        Polite Moose 12 January 2018 19: 45 New
        +5
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        Chinese smugglers on this occasion have taken on increased social obligations, Russian joyfully tore two button accordions!

        Rather, not smugglers, but wholesalers, railway workers, truckers and shuttles. Everyone will switch to a round-the-clock work schedule.
        China is the main trading partner of the UK. There is practically no sea border. All freight traffic will go dry. We have the same. Whose ships were going to intercept these DBs? (According to S.V. Lavrov). Mongolian, or what?
        1. Metallurg_2
          Metallurg_2 12 January 2018 20: 33 New
          +4
          You’ll still laugh, but Mongolia, without access to the sea, provides services for registering ships under its own flag))) Google "Convenient flags".
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 13 January 2018 02: 47 New
            +1
            Mongolia, having no access to the sea, provides services for the registration of ships under its own flag
            It will soon begin to provide services with home ports. laughing
    2. oldzek
      oldzek 12 January 2018 19: 06 New
      +1
      Well, our Railways will work on this.
    3. MadCat
      MadCat 12 January 2018 21: 15 New
      +2
      Quote: Rusland
      Everything is on land. We found something for everyone.

      China closes the border, with Yu.K. there is no trade for a long time. EUN really got everyone with his rusty rockets ...
  3. Observer2014
    Observer2014 12 January 2018 18: 47 New
    +4
    Eun, in response, point a rocket at Berlin and London. laughing In there they will manage.
    Don’t point to Paris. There, and so full of opa. Parisians are not French lol
    1. Black_Vatnik
      Black_Vatnik 12 January 2018 18: 50 New
      +2
      So the Berliners have long been in Turkish, but farce in the farce)
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 12 January 2018 18: 51 New
        +4
        Black_Vatnik
        So the Berliners have long been in Turkish, but in farce they
        The Berliners of jambs have been stuck to us recently. So Eun is in their furnace am
        1. Mih1974
          Mih1974 13 January 2018 01: 08 New
          +2
          That's honest - I’m starting to like this “circus” more and more good already I want someone to be "searched" there or drowned. Moreover, I would like the Americans to fool and "to be witty" to bomb Eun, and in response (from all the dope) he would defuse them, in South Korea and in Japiya lol . And here we sit aside, laughter. (and if China fits into it - in general a fairy tale will turn out).
    2. Rusland
      Rusland 12 January 2018 18: 53 New
      +8
      Let it not be spent, Iran has already sent its missiles there, a holy place does not exist.
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 12 January 2018 19: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Observer2014
      Eun, in response, point a rocket at Berlin and London. laughing In there they will manage.
      Don’t point to Paris. There, and so full of opa. Parisians are not French lol

      Why so far? There is Tokyo nearby, Seoul. And then suddenly it doesn’t fly and will crash in Siberia.
  4. maxim1987
    maxim1987 12 January 2018 18: 49 New
    +1
    and the great maritime power of Urkain why not subscribe?
    1. Rusland
      Rusland 12 January 2018 18: 55 New
      +8
      Missed, prepared the answer for the return of their fleet.
    2. lis-ik
      lis-ik 12 January 2018 19: 26 New
      0
      Quote: maximNNX
      and the great maritime power of Urkain why not subscribe?

      They have nothing to intercept, now they bite their elbows, a freebie passes by.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 12 January 2018 20: 34 New
        0
        Quote: lis-ik
        They have nothing to intercept, now they bite their elbows, a freebie passes by.

        What, rubber boats and oars drank too?
  5. onix757
    onix757 12 January 2018 18: 50 New
    +7
    All fundamental requirements of Russia to the text of the American The draft UN Security Council resolution on DPRK was taken into account. About this, as reported by TASS, said the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova.
    "For a short period of work on a resolution that the co-authors thought was a tool to strangle DPRK citizens, it was possible to remove completely unacceptable points," Zakharova said. "All the fundamental requirements of Russia for the resolution were taken into account in the text." "Our red lines co-authors did not cross "- stressed the diplomat.
    Requirements for the interception and inspection of ships on the high seas disappeared from the resolutionthus, "this part of the document has been brought into conformity with international law of the sea." The provisions on expanding the list of dual-use goods were also brought into line with the procedures of the sanctions committee. The text on the oil embargo, the clause on the deportation of labor migrants, contrary to humanitarian standards, was removed from the text. In addition, it was possible to achieve an exemption from the sanctions regime of a joint Russian-North Korean enterprise in Rajin.
    ____________________________________________

    Everything is as before. The head of the country plays with partners in a giveaway, they nod and act in their own way. But the Russian Federation on the perimeter of friends less and less and more wars
    1. Maz
      Maz 12 January 2018 20: 11 New
      0
      There is one more. The way. Our submarines are under American inspectors, Russian (approx. For the elite) 2. Our submarines are under vessels with goods. In this case of the law of the sea, the entire space under and above the nuclear submarines is Russian, and if anyone starts to enter it, then by law they will get their teeth. How if they crossed the state border of the Russian Federation. Yeah. Or the boat will pop up in cable. 10000 tons as it jumps out next, or eight, or seven, then the frigate throws like a ball from a racket, and that the cruiser does not seem enough. Sailors will correct if wrong. And in general, who canceled the land border with China, and the border of China with the Russian Federation? And with SK?
  6. assa67
    assa67 12 January 2018 18: 53 New
    +7
    they really want to strangle the UK ..... well, by trains we’ll chase help, since the UN does not see, in fact, a humanitarian catastrophe in Korea .... what humanity is starving an entire people to ensure their own safety, spitting on the whole world .. ..and note-the mattresses and their lackeys and slaves (it’s strange how dill didn’t go to piracy in boats) .... and they’re not going to destroy the cargo, but to clean up ... they gave themselves a patent for piracy
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. demo
    demo 12 January 2018 19: 01 New
    +6
    The statement was signed by Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, USA, France, South Korea and Japan.

    Well, where does the Great Sea Power - Poland climb then?
    Three Baltic tigers are missing - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
    Then Eun would have surely destroyed his vigorous weapon from fear.
    1. Vanin
      Vanin 12 January 2018 19: 08 New
      +4
      Quote: demo
      Well, where does the Great Sea Power - Poland climb then?

      Well, how without them, because Russia will be caught there!))))
      But the DPRK has always been under the protection of China and Russia .. In vain you gentlemen started this! Overlaid again .. heh heh
      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic 12 January 2018 19: 15 New
        +5
        VANIN - not hehekai, Vitaliy, wassat awesome! !! fool You change the style, then no one will calculate for you! !! good
        1. Vanin
          Vanin 12 January 2018 20: 52 New
          +2
          Quote: Herkulesich
          VANIN - not hehekai, Vitaliy, wassat awesome! !! fool You change the style, then no one will calculate for you! !! good

          Maybe ... It's not in my rules to retreat men! he he

          Moments and thanks for that ALL!
          MIKHAN needs to be forgiven and unban .. soldier
      2. onix757
        onix757 12 January 2018 19: 21 New
        +2
        Syria was also protected, the current is in ruins and is dismembered. Who needs such protection. Eun understands this and relies only on himself and China, close in ideology.
        1. Vanin
          Vanin 12 January 2018 21: 16 New
          +3
          Quote: onix757
          Syria was also protected, the current is in ruins and is dismembered. Who needs such protection. Eun understands this and relies only on himself and China, close in ideology.

          And Iraq and Libya ..? Syria has almost returned the territory under its control. Assad their leader was and remains ..! Yes, Russia helped, but the Syrians carried out ground operations with Hezbollah units! And this is a huge plus for them, the population supports them ..
  9. Herculesic
    Herculesic 12 January 2018 19: 13 New
    +1
    I do not see ukroiny signature! lol But the Poles clearly smoked apples, mongrels, like everyone who signed this shameful piece of paper! I advise you to arm your entire merchant fleet! good And drive the US carrier group across the ocean with the help of five seiners! !! good wassat
  10. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 12 January 2018 19: 15 New
    +2
    But the principle of extraterritoriality of sea ships this flock of jackals do not care? It seems to me that this is a sure step towards declaring war.
    1. Sands Careers General
      Sands Careers General 12 January 2018 20: 21 New
      +3
      That's just it, a violation of all unthinkable laws.
    2. Metallurg_2
      Metallurg_2 12 January 2018 20: 36 New
      0
      In-in, let them declare war on the PRC. And it is advisable to do this on September 11th.
  11. APASUS
    APASUS 12 January 2018 19: 25 New
    +2
    Do the Americans not lose hope that With Korea will break on the American provocation and itself will start a war?
    1. Mih1974
      Mih1974 13 January 2018 01: 13 New
      +1
      So I already wrote above - let's pair oil tankers here and there with our cruiser under the “camera”, the “camera” and the WHOLE World and Cuba to remember which the Americans were trying to block. good Let the Americans devour their "caps" from anger (take the example of sukashshvili).
  12. tralmaster.
    tralmaster. 12 January 2018 19: 29 New
    0
    Well, here you have NATO in the Far East under our shores. China, too, probably will not like it. The same armada will sail in the Golden and Japanese Seas. Acquaintance with a possible theater of operations.
  13. Lexus
    Lexus 12 January 2018 19: 30 New
    +6
    US and 16 more countries gathered to intercept the court for violation of sanctions against the DPRK

    The Koreans will transfer their ships under the Chinese flag, and then we all laugh together at these "mount interceptors."
  14. mavrus
    mavrus 12 January 2018 19: 33 New
    +2
    Quote: Black_Jacket
    I smell the new trials of Ynovsky toys)

    A purely rhetorical question. Greece has enough fuel to send its interceptors to the shores of the DPRK?)

    Greece, even in NATO, could put pressure ... But Argentina on which climbs there? Submarines nowhere to go?
    1. m.cempbell
      m.cempbell 12 January 2018 20: 13 New
      +2
      And Argentina why the hell climbs there?

      Curly macho people have been dancing to the tune of mattresses for a long time
      1. Metallurg_2
        Metallurg_2 12 January 2018 20: 37 New
        +1
        Well, what do you want if the Rothschilds hold them for a causal place after the default of 2001?
    2. Metallurg_2
      Metallurg_2 12 January 2018 20: 28 New
      0
      And the one that drowned - was not the last one by accident?
  15. Dormidont
    Dormidont 12 January 2018 19: 44 New
    +1
    Decided to intercept. Kim is a serious guy. Can and snap off
  16. Makarov
    Makarov 12 January 2018 19: 55 New
    0
    I understand everything, but .... Poland ?!))))
    1. Metallurg_2
      Metallurg_2 12 January 2018 20: 38 New
      0
      Polska od morza do morza - heard this?
      Apparently it should be understood: from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific)))
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack 12 January 2018 20: 55 New
        +8
        From walrus to walrus ...

        Poor, poor Poland crying
  17. Azazelo
    Azazelo 12 January 2018 19: 56 New
    0
    We need to send our destroyer SK .... we’ll see who can delay it ...
  18. Maz
    Maz 12 January 2018 20: 07 New
    +2
    Quote: SRC P-15
    Something tells me that these vessels will accompany North Korean submarines.

    Music didn’t play for long and Trump promised us the world,
    Toto China aircraft carrier built so quickly and sculpted
    Gathered countries to beat the Koreans, which is north than Seoul
    And it’s a clear stump that will gobble up Kim Jong-un’s rocket again.
  19. m.cempbell
    m.cempbell 12 January 2018 20: 12 New
    +2
    The statement was signed by Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, USA, France, South Korea and Japan.

    Here is a list of legalized pirate groups, otherwise Somalis ...
    It seems to me that from now on, ships will accompany warships.
  20. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 12 January 2018 20: 20 New
    +3
    We must take into account the impressive submarine fleet of the DPRK))
  21. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 12 January 2018 20: 23 New
    +1
    Quote:
    "Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, the United States, France, South Korea and Japan signed the application."
    End of quote.

    And where are the giants of world politics such as Ukraine, Georgia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania on the list?
    1. CAT BAIYUN
      CAT BAIYUN 12 January 2018 22: 37 New
      +4
      Withdrew from the language :) But already commented ....
      I've been thinking the same thing, but where are these great strongholds of democracy? laughing
  22. fedor13
    fedor13 12 January 2018 20: 35 New
    -1
    Grabbing cups, this is the height of cynicism. They are waiting in the museum :) :) :)
  23. shuravi
    shuravi 12 January 2018 21: 05 New
    0
    In short, the ports of Nakhodka and Vladivostok will work more.
  24. Bypassed
    Bypassed 12 January 2018 21: 20 New
    0
    From the PRC side, the DPRK rests on an 8-lane high-wei.
    They sneezed for sanctions.
    China will at least provide its testing ground at least
  25. Sergey956
    Sergey956 12 January 2018 22: 13 New
    0
    And did this Statesman decide to gather in the Japanese and East China Seas? Perhaps Eun will arrange extraordinary exercises so that they do not have time to scatter.
  26. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 12 January 2018 22: 36 New
    +4
    The statement was signed by Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, USA, France, South Korea and Japan.

    The Ukrainian theme is already imposed in the teeth, but why is Ukraine not in the business ?! Without them - well, no way !!!! Without a fleet, Ukraine, the whole operation flies to hell !! laughing
  27. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 12 January 2018 22: 37 New
    +2
    Well, with civil courts everything is clear. And if, for example, a cruiser, a BDK, or an aircraft carrier escorted from a country that is not particularly friendly with the Naglosaks (China, for example) fall under suspicion? Well, purely hypothetically. How will they intercept and inspect him?
    1. CAT BAIYUN
      CAT BAIYUN 12 January 2018 22: 48 New
      +4
      How will they intercept and inspect him?

      No way. But tryndet - it's not tossing bags.
      But it’s disgusting that this whole shushera generally allows herself to make such statements. I am hoping that they will once run into their proper place and calm down.
      But the option of intentionally provoking Un is not ruled out.
  28. Curious
    Curious 13 January 2018 00: 19 New
    +1
    Reading comments, one wonders at the insight of some people. For example, the “Prayer of Daniel the Sharpener” by the ancient Russian writer and enlightener Daniil Sharpener (XII – XIII centuries): “They fight screaming crazy, they do not sow, but they themselves give birth.”
    1. Brylevsky
      Brylevsky 13 January 2018 11: 13 New
      +1
      Yes, because they write comments or schoolchildren, or people far from the specifics of maritime shipping.
      1. Curious
        Curious 15 January 2018 00: 35 New
        +1
        I have long offered to launch on the site after 21 years.
  29. aszzz888
    aszzz888 13 January 2018 03: 19 New
    0
    The statement was signed by Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Singapore, USA, France, South Korea and Japan.

    And why not unnecessary? After all, there is the largest composition of admirals, and there are rubber boats! The mess !!! laughing wassat
  30. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii 13 January 2018 03: 30 New
    +6
    Quote: MadCat
    Quote: Rusland
    Everything is on land. We found something for everyone.

    China closes the border, with Yu.K. there is no trade for a long time. EUN really got everyone with his rusty rockets ...

    And where does Yu. K.? Are you at all in the subject? Blow to the states, there are "no rusty rockets" hi
  31. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 13 January 2018 04: 40 New
    0
    Something our Svidomo / great sea power / did not have time to distinguish themselves, I thought they would be the first on the list, "Getman Sagaidachny" was already afloat or forever against the wall.
  32. Mikhail Anokhin
    Mikhail Anokhin 13 January 2018 05: 41 New
    0
    Pirates of the 21st century!
    To the pirate swarm!
  33. ajx
    ajx 13 January 2018 07: 17 New
    0
    We actually have a common land border and there is a piece of iron
  34. nivander
    nivander 13 January 2018 09: 06 New
    0
    filibusters, corsairs and privateers
  35. andron-30
    andron-30 13 January 2018 11: 08 New
    +1
    yes, they scared you, how do you live on in North Korea? it’s only the survival of such a small country on a planetary scale, in the face of all kinds of sanctions and restrictions, that only makes the people of this country more and more resilient, which causes respect.
  36. Terenin
    Terenin 13 January 2018 12: 10 New
    +5
    Countries undertake to conduct inspections on the high seas and, if necessary, send suspected vessels to their ports. Well, how does everyone want to inspect and confiscate. The people in Russia do not like similar departments. Nightmare business am
  37. Berg berg
    Berg berg 13 January 2018 12: 43 New
    0
    And how do they imagine it if they are accompanied by military vessels? Most likely they will drown quietly in the waters of the DPRK. That's what it means to blurt out without thinking.
  38. Whitesnow
    Whitesnow 13 January 2018 13: 07 New
    +1
    Apparently, American figures did not hear about 1460 km of the DPRK land border with the best friends of the United States - China and Russia.
    1. Vanin
      Vanin 13 January 2018 13: 54 New
      +3
      Quote: Whitesnow
      Apparently, American figures did not hear about 1460 km of the DPRK land border with the best friends of the United States - China and Russia.

      Yes, they remember and therefore are afraid to strike ..! This is not the Middle East for them .. laughing
      Eun, doesn’t like to chat ..!

      Let them try, only ..!