Military Review

Two Su-34 bomber transferred to Russian Aerospace Forces

37
Novosibirsk aviation The plant handed over to the Russian Air Force the first two multifunctional Su-34 bombers this year, the region’s law enforcement agencies said Friday.


The first delivery of Su-34 bombers in 2018 was made. These two aircraft will come into service of the air regiment in the Chelyabinsk region.
- Said the source agency.

Two Su-34 bomber transferred to Russian Aerospace Forces


Military pilots will be trained on new machines in the Lipetsk center of combat use of front-line aviation. Training will last two months. After that, the bombers will arrive at the place of permanent deployment.

Earlier, the assistant commander of the Central Military District, Yaroslav Roshchupkin, said that the air regiment stationed in the Chelyabinsk region would receive six Su-34 bombers in service in the first quarter of the 2018 of the year. This will be the first delivery of such aircraft in the Central Military District.

In 2017, the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant. Chkalov (part of the Sukhoi company) delivered Su-14 bombers to 34 state defense orders.

Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. allaykbar
    allaykbar 12 January 2018 13: 10
    +8
    comments are needed that the two are few and that the Kremlin is mocking the patriots by throwing them these bones
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 12 January 2018 13: 34
      13
      Comments are also needed that it is a waste of money on outdated rusty trash - instead of distributing money to pensioners, pregnant women and children.
      1. Alexanast
        Alexanast 12 January 2018 13: 41
        10
        Quote: Alexey RA
        to give money to pensioners, pregnant women and children.


        Yes Yes!!! Pregnant retirees in the first place ... wassat
      2. m.cempbell
        m.cempbell 12 January 2018 14: 08
        +1
        Not a h ... ra myself, the most modern bomber is "rust rubbish" ?!
        1. Berkut24
          Berkut24 12 January 2018 15: 11
          +2
          Not a h ... ra myself, the most modern bomber is "rust rubbish" ?!

          And then, in Ukraine, 3 old MIG-29s are always ready to sink the entire Black Sea Fleet, including submarines, in one flight, and the Su-34 cannot even dream of such success ...
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 12 January 2018 13: 37
      +1
      Quote: allaykbar
      comments are needed that the two are few and that the Kremlin is mocking patriots

      Yeah sho laughing I had a thought - And who is there in Novosib, so smart, who came up with the first report in the New Year bully
    3. seti
      seti 12 January 2018 13: 41
      +1
      I think there is no problem in larger production. The question is how appropriate is it ... Su-34 is enough for its needs and 250-300 pcs. Large export orders are needed, but they are still surprisingly absent. If it were possible to load NAZ by raising production and providing additional profit.
      1. m.cempbell
        m.cempbell 12 January 2018 14: 05
        +1
        Yes, it's just that there is time for everyone to have bombers, there are no tenders so far visible to him.
        1. Rushnairfors
          Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 16: 59
          +1
          I think just the opposite, not at all. Specialized attack aircraft remained only in Russia and the USA (f15е strike needles), well, Europe has a bit of a tornado, the rest take multifunctional devices as a basis, apparently cheaper than buying both, especially since multifunctional vehicles work quite well on the ground, the same China, with its economy and the financing of the army and Su30, took and Su35 takes, and Su34 does not.
          1. Sergei1982
            Sergei1982 12 January 2018 17: 48
            +2
            Quote: Rushnairfors
            , the same China, with its economy and the financing of the army and Su30, took and Su35 takes, and Su34 - no.

            China has its own clean drummer JH-7
            1. Rushnairfors
              Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 18: 14
              +2
              Fig se. I have never heard of such a thing. I will know now, thanks. And yet, Russia, the USA, China, a bit Europe. Quite “powerful” countries, it is they who, as I wrote above, can afford to have the luxury of specialized vehicles such as front-line bombers or attack aircraft (or interceptors like mig31). The less affluent cannot afford it, so they buy multipurpose ones, so there is no one to order su34.
              1. Sergei1982
                Sergei1982 12 January 2018 18: 39
                0
                Quote: Rushnairfors
                I have never heard of such a thing. I will know now, thanks.

                But they say the Chinese do not really respect him as a drummer (although they seem to have built more than 200), they prefer our Su-30MK to the top article, there is an article about him https://topwar.ru/64051-istrebitel-bombardirovsch
                ik-xian-jh-7-kitay.html and we had them on the airdart http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2034994.html, although it is listed as an IS, it is essentially from the same series as the Su-34 ,Tornado
                1. Rushnairfors
                  Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 18: 47
                  +6
                  By the way, this year our forces with Chinese dalniks were measured on darts, they frightened the guys that their Tu16 is a know-how in the area of ​​avionics, that there bombs lay down with a ratio of no more than 3 meters, the three of them even have practically no hephaestus. Our them as PUPPIES !!! Well, of course, the Chinese people faked it in their favor (but why there, ours were also moving targets), but at heart it’s so nice that in fact we got them and they know it.
    4. Piramidon
      Piramidon 12 January 2018 14: 02
      +6
      Quote: allaykbar
      comments are needed that the two are few and that the Kremlin is mocking the patriots by throwing them these bones

      You can add: "it’s all gone, only TWO for the WHOLE 2018 year!"
  2. Muvka
    Muvka 12 January 2018 13: 12
    +2
    Something early. Surely, they didn’t lose time, and with the early delivery of cars last year, several planes were able to produce a superplan.
  3. Hiw
    Hiw 12 January 2018 15: 02
    +2
    Why orders for weapons ??? what would be the profit ??? And to whom is she leaving ??? To our corporations owned by private individuals ??? I understand-armament is needed for the security of the country, but why use it to enrich private individuals ??? Just don’t tell me that the money goes to the state .... and that there are a lot of people who work at enterprises who receive salaries — they work there only because small and private businesses in the country are squeezed, and squeezed including arms producing corporations — they they sell S-400 to Turkey and they give out loans for this to the Turks to get a percentage, they don’t care that the labor is NATO, the main thing is money, but try to open a simple private enterprise and you will not survive due to taxes and checks

    We need weapons just as much so that others are a little afraid and respect us, but to sell them and make a profit on the fact that people mow from our Kalash all over the world - this is not in Russian, oh how not in Russian. We extract 40% of all natural resources, and only 2% of the world's population lives with us - bitch, where my dividends are, and they also sell weapons

    PATRIOT IS NOT THE ONE FOR WEAPONS, PATRIOT IS NOT THE ONE FOR THE WELL-BEING OF THE PEOPLE
    1. DenZ
      DenZ 12 January 2018 15: 15
      +8
      Quote: HIW
      but try to open a simple private enterprise and you will not survive due to taxes and inspections

      IPshnik is a loser? I guessed? My friend also has his own business, and he swears, swears, but works and makes very good money. The main thing? - Do not breed snot.
      At the beginning of your epos, you are, as it were, against private traders at the head of large corporations, and at the end, you complain about the hard work of private traders. So
      Quote: HIW
      simple private enterprise
      The S-400 will never be released, for which corporations are needed. In short, save your snot for Echo matzah and the like “patriots for the well-being of the people” who think that well-being of the people can already be protected.
      1. allaykbar
        allaykbar 12 January 2018 15: 32
        +5
        PATRIOT IS NOT THE ONE FOR WEAPONS, PATRIOT IS NOT THE ONE FOR THE WELL-BEING OF THE PEOPLE


        It annoys me that on “military review” cooks and economists are registered who haven’t served in the army, who are for world peace, who call for friendship with the West and think that this Kremlin is just distracting from something there, creating an atmosphere of hatred for mattresses and their lovers

        We need weapons just as much so that others are a little afraid and respect us, but to sell them and make a profit on the fact that people mow from our Kalash all over the world - this is not in Russian, oh how not in Russian.


        warm. And this character and the general designer in some kind of Almaz-Antey have the same weight in the “election”

        bitch, where are my dividends, and they also sell weapons


        the dividend is looking for his character. And talks about business.

        The character does not give a damn about the employees of the concerns, their families, their salaries. But he kind of worries about us all
        1. Hiw
          Hiw 12 January 2018 16: 47
          +5
          Come on, don’t juggle, I don’t care about the fate of those who work in defense concerns, therefore I write, because I have in my private business a profit for 3-5 hours of work for 4 working days a week more than for those who plow at the machine 8 hours 5 days a week, or even 6 days in defense enterprises - this is also beneficial for the government, earning on someone else's hump. I just don’t understand - what the hell is written in the constitution that we have a social state, but medetsine and education are paid ??? What the hell Germany defeated by us lives better ??? Why the hell a German pensioner can go to a restaurant once a week and ours are interrupted from pension to pension ??? Are you cheering patriots to me? Not love for the motherland ??? I don’t love my homeland, I don’t like our thieves from the authorities, but I love our homeland, including weapons
          1. allaykbar
            allaykbar 12 January 2018 17: 20
            +3
            I do not care about the fate of those who work in defense concerns


            therefore, you propose not to engage in export and not to take orders for our enterprises. And to make it enough for yourself - and then you can preserve production until the moment when you need to update the backlog and send workers on unpaid leave?

            That you how many families now left without a job his proposal? Million?

            We need weapons just as much so that others are a little afraid of us and respect


            Yes? Or maybe two million.

            I just don’t understand - what the hell is written in the constitution that we have a social state, and medetsine and education are paid


            you have a lot of mistakes, businessman. But not the point.

            Higher education for free (1st)
            Can a school be paid? Or maybe you paid $ 200 a month for kindergarten?

            Or do you want even those who don’t need to enter a university without a competition?

            Regarding free medicine, you decide - do you want quality or sick leave to take and self-medicate?

            I like dreaming of free medicine - then the same ones - dreaming of QUALITY of medicine.

            I think that according to the price tag - our medicine is free or relatively paid. Paid medicine is in the west. And so there is quality.

            And then doctors can give in the face. Drunken hospital visitors. Then the doctor will receive his 60 rubles and think - does he need it at all?

            Why the hell a German pensioner can go to a restaurant once a week and ours are interrupted from pension to pension


            arrange a holiday for your grandmother. Pay her a trip to the restaurant.

            I don’t love my homeland, I don’t like our thieves from the authorities, but I love our homeland, including weapons


            Well, you can write something different on the fence
      2. Hiw
        Hiw 12 January 2018 16: 36
        +3
        No, dear, I didn’t guess, I have just a successful private business, but it’s charming because I can fight back and have some acquaintance with the tax, but it’s all tired of fighting for what I rightfully own
        And please, don’t put me on a par with the liberals, I have never listened against them and will never get into this dirt, but I’m still against what’s happening in the country now - all oil dolars and gas dolars are offshore, yes the same tax, Plato - not the state but goes to private companies, Putin screams about the increase in production and of. Rosstat data - production decline of 3,8%, look at the Rosstat website yourself.
        1. DenZ
          DenZ 12 January 2018 17: 31
          +4
          Quote: HIW
          And please do not put me on a par with the liberals

          But how- written in capital letters-
          Quote: HIW
          PATRIOT IS NOT THE ONE FOR WEAPONS, PATRIOT IS NOT THE ONE FOR THE WELL-BEING OF THE PEOPLE
          Is that an attack of pacifism visible? Even if this is him (an attack of pacifism), then explain your idea to the end and do not throw slogans. After all, you seem to be quite sensible in your next posts (I even partially agree with you).
  4. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 12 January 2018 15: 38
    +3
    It's nice that we are updating. Let relatively quiet glanders, but in many key high-tech areas.
  5. Seriomilander
    Seriomilander 12 January 2018 16: 08
    +1
    The feeling that this is 15 and 16 according to the state defense order of 2017, that is, the planes already taken into account in 2017, for example, by the North in its “Results”: sdelanounas.ru/blogs/102453/

    In 2017, NAZ produced a total of 16 Su-34 aircraft.
    Transfer of the videoconferencing to the account of the state defense order of 2017

    - four in the party on May 22, 2017 (airplanes with red tail numbers “24”, “25”, “27” and “29”),

    - four in the party on October 16, 2017 (airplanes with red tail numbers “30”, “31”, “32” and “33”)

    - two in the party on November 20, 2017 (presumably, aircraft with red tail numbers “35” and “36”)

    - two in the party on November 24, 2017 (presumably, aircraft with red tail numbers “01” and “02”)

    - two in the party on December 22, 2017 (presumably, aircraft with red tail numbers “03” and “04”)

    - two in a party in late December or early January ??? (presumably, aircraft with red tail numbers "05" and "06")

    Six Su-34 aircraft, which should arrive first to rearm the 2nd bomber regiment before the end of February 2018, have already been built at the V.P. Novosibirsk Aviation Plant Chkalova (NAZ) of Sukhoi Company PJSC under the 2017 program. These aircraft have red tail numbers from "01" to "06".
  6. faiver
    faiver 12 January 2018 16: 19
    +1
    Well, if two Su-34 every 12 days in a year is good hi
    1. Rushnairfors
      Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 17: 23
      +2
      Yes, in general, 12 planes a year are not bad, we have only 24 Suapolines left for Su2 and Shagol and Marinovka - the rest are already driving 34x (sea su24 are not counted, they are replaced with su30cm), so in 2-3 years all the bombers will be on su34, at the same time it’s stupid to write off su24m, especially those that have undergone modernization under SVP24, because in the same Syria you can combine the “pleasant with the useful”: nonsense to wet-once, save the su34-two resource, that's why rearmament is taking place at such a relatively slow pace. And the plant is in operation, starting this year, along with the construction, the modernization of previously received aircraft will begin.
      1. Sergei1982
        Sergei1982 12 January 2018 17: 44
        +1
        Quote: Rushnairfors
        , we have BAPs on su24 only 2 left Shagol and Marinovka

        They forgot about Monchegorsk, there, in addition to the MiG-31, if I am not mistaken, there are 2 squadrons on the Su-24, one MP another on M.
        1. Rushnairfors
          Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 18: 21
          +4
          So exactly Moncha, by the way there is also Mig31, and about 6 years ago there were Mig25rb there !!!!!!! We then flew at least in Olenegorsk, we scored flights and Moncha was flying and I saw this plane for the first time live, there were only one ae for 2009 and now, as a result of the reform, they drove them from west to north. Now they have written off everything.
          1. Victor jnnjdfy
            Victor jnnjdfy 13 January 2018 08: 04
            0
            In Crimea, there is the 24th. The sailors in Novofedorovka and in the Guards glanders (esc. On the 24th and esc. On the 25th).
  7. Hiw
    Hiw 12 January 2018 17: 10
    +2
    Quote: allaykbar
    It annoys me that on “military review” cooks and economists are registered who haven’t served in the army, who are for world peace, who call for friendship with the West and think that this Kremlin is just distracting from something there, creating an atmosphere of hatred for mattresses and their lovers

    Are you here who called a cook ??? I would ask to be more polite, I think that politeness, kindness and decency have not been canceled at the military review forum. And yes - I am for world peace, and you are against ??? If it’s against, then this forum is not your place, because weapons are needed not for war, but for peace, at least for us, Russia.
    Now specifically tell me - where did I call to be friends with the West ??? What the hell are such speculations ??? As for me, they understand one friendship - the “flag over the reystag”
    It’s just a pity that you don’t have enough logic to understand that it’s a weapon not for sale, but for protection, but now everything has simply grown into a business, if we need weapons, then there is a state order for this, if the state order is over then you don’t need any more weapons, and if you care about people, then the state needs to create a small and medium business that does not stifle taxes and inspections, by the way, they don’t produce so many weapons in France, but for some reason people have a better standard of living, let's face it in the eyes - we and the mafia’s weapons sit and steal. What, you want to say that all the profit, for example, from the production of the same su-34 goes to the workers of the enterprise ??? then they should receive an average of 300-400 thousand per month. Or maybe you say that it goes all to the state treasury, then our pensioners should receive 50-80 thousand per month - Where is all this ???
    1. allaykbar
      allaykbar 12 January 2018 18: 15
      +2
      And yes - I am for world peace, and you are against ??? If it’s against, then this forum is not your place, because weapons are needed not for war, but for peace, at least for us, Russia.


      Well here is not a forum of dreamers. And we are not talking for dreams. Are you an adult?

      Now specifically tell me - where did I call to be friends with the West ???


      Well, you offered to give our arms markets to the west. Maybe this is of course to the west. I do not know

      if we need weapons, then there is a state order for this, if the state order is over, then we don’t need any more weapons


      with capacities what to do? I already asked above. Everyone on an unpaid vacation?

      then the state needs to create small and medium-sized businesses


      are you inside Are you definitely a businessman? How such a businessman can write, I do not understand.

      by the way, in the same France they don’t produce so many weapons, but for some reason people have a better standard of living


      we and the mafia’s weapons are sitting and stealing.


      laughing not a liberal, you say?

      Do you want to say that all the profit, for example, from the production of the same Su-34 goes to the workers of the enterprise?


      I do not like to write nonsense and fantasize. Please show me where I fountained it

      then they should receive an average of 300-400 thousand per month.


      Are you a successful businessman now calculated

      Or maybe you say that it goes all to the state treasury, then our pensioners should receive 50-80 thousand per month - Where is all this ???


      I do not make diagnoses of course. But there is something wrong.
    2. Rushnairfors
      Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 18: 25
      +2
      Even though I’m not a foot in the economy or business, I’ll agree with you somewhere, there are a lot of orders at the Irkutsk zavol and they work in 3 shifts and they lure specialists, but people don’t raise salaries very much, people complain.
      1. Rushnairfors
        Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 18: 25
        +2
        I apologize for getting into your discussion
        1. allaykbar
          allaykbar 12 January 2018 18: 42
          +2
          small salaries are present in the military-industrial complex. And in science. I do not argue with this fact.

          Although, I think an intelligent welder is not bad at receiving. And the specialist behind the CNC machine too

          http://www.almaz-antey.ru/kadrovaya-i-sotsialnaya
          -politika /

          Interesting to read. But this is Almaz-Antey.

          http://www.irkut.com/job/vacancies/10/

          here I think the salary is less. In general, you need to look and analyze. To blame indiscriminately is not the case.

          1. Rushnairfors
            Rushnairfors 12 January 2018 19: 03
            +2
            Yes, I do not hay in any case, thanks for the links.
  8. Koronik
    Koronik 13 January 2018 07: 27
    0
    Yes, undoubtedly 14 units is very small, that is, within 10 years, the delivery on state defense orders will be 140 aircraft, this is ridiculous.
  9. Hiw
    Hiw 13 January 2018 16: 15
    0
    Quote: DenZ
    Is that an attack of pacifism visible? Even if this is him (an attack of pacifism), then explain your idea to the end and do not throw slogans. After all, you seem to be quite sensible in your next posts (I even partially agree with you)

    And here is pacifism, it's just that a weapon is not an end in itself, even a strong army is not an end in itself, this is all necessary out of necessity, until opponents understand differently - an end in itself is a happy, peaceful life of people, and, in principle, why pacifism if it will act , but so far unfortunately does not work. And on the account that you are asking to clarify the idea - the idea is that all the governments of the world use an external threat in order to fill their pockets and with the naked eye that our bonzes are not the last, because in order to have a good army It is not necessary to sell weapons abroad, it is enough to have money in the state treasury for these weapons, and all our arms corporations are private, and their profit is not the profit of the people, but the profit of fat cats, and the turners at the factory, as they received a penny, are getting it. In order to raise the economy, it is necessary not to trade in arms and fill private pockets, but to return money from offshore companies, we need to nationally analyze our people's resources, we need to nationally analyze the main industries, we need to raise salaries for people, leave the WTO - yes, you yourself know everything and see, people in cities receive 20 tr - what's this ? The salary ??? and in the countryside even less. And at the same time, we are the second in the world in the sale of weapons - and this not only does not add to the well-being of the people, it also reduces our security - now they have our weapons