Military Review

The US Navy said that they are not relevant to the report on the death of the San Juan diesel-electric submarines

25
The US Navy Intelligence Directorate is not related to the report on the death of the Argentine submarine San Juan, it was written by former analyst of this service Bruce Roel, reports TASS statement by an intelligence representative.


The US Navy said that they are not relevant to the report on the death of the San Juan diesel-electric submarines


Earlier, Western media began to quote the alleged management report, according to which "the submarine hull was completely destroyed in about 40 milliseconds." The author of the study claims that the Argentine sailors died instantly.

The author of this report left the office a few years ago,
said the agency interlocutor.

According to him, the US Navy "has no relation to the publication, the conclusions set out in it belong exclusively to the former analyst himself."

Recall, the Argentine Navy's diesel-electric submarines “San Juan” stopped contacting 15 on November 2017 during the transition from the Ushuaia base to Mar del Plata. After 15 days after the disappearance of the submarine, the command of the Argentinean command announced the termination of the crew rescue operation and the search for the submarine itself.
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. pvv113
    pvv113 12 January 2018 12: 00 New
    +5
    US Navy "has nothing to do with publication

    Why would such a reaction? I won’t be surprised that this analyst was fired today the year before last.
    1. figwam
      figwam 12 January 2018 12: 03 New
      +5
      They have nothing to do with it, only the ears have become so long that they stick out at every tragedy.
      1. Vend
        Vend 12 January 2018 12: 07 New
        +6
        Quote: figvam
        They have nothing to do with it, only the ears have become so long that they stick out at every tragedy.

        They have even a very large one, to the victories of others. Assign them regularly.
        1. Shura Perm
          Shura Perm 12 January 2018 12: 28 New
          0
          do yes they say no
          1. Shurik70
            Shurik70 12 January 2018 13: 05 New
            +2
            OP-PA ... I suppose the journalist who first published this is already very accidentally unhappily fatal?
            How did they attach it, it is interesting that everyone instantly died? You can’t do a volume explosion under water. A very powerful homing mine torpedo?
    2. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 12: 04 New
      +4
      Quote: pvv113
      Why would such a reaction?

      Do you want to remind who the hat is on? wink
      Quote: pvv113
      I won’t be surprised that this analyst was fired today the year before last.

      I’m wondering: does anyone doubt the direct involvement of the United States in the death of this submarine? Personally, I have no doubt about this.
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 12 January 2018 12: 13 New
        +5
        It was painfully accurate data about the explosion in this report they issued
        1. CooL_SnipeR
          CooL_SnipeR 12 January 2018 12: 41 New
          +1
          Yeah, esh kuma 9 pie - I don’t think winked (C)
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit 12 January 2018 13: 01 New
        +2
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        I’m wondering: does anyone doubt the direct involvement of the United States in the death of this submarine?

        For example, I’m not sure that the states are directly involved. But all the same, vague doubts torment what is wrong here.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 13: 06 New
          +4
          And I do not impose my point of view. hi
          Quote: Orionvit
          tormented by vague doubts

          Doubts tend to develop into suspicions, and suspicions into confidence. wink
          1. pvv113
            pvv113 12 January 2018 13: 29 New
            +3
            There is no doubt about the states, but immediately begin to suspect wink
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 12 January 2018 13: 32 New
              +3
              So after all, they themselves have created such a reputation: "A plug in every barrel." lol
          2. Orionvit
            Orionvit 12 January 2018 14: 00 New
            +1
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            And I do not impose my point of view

            And here I impose or do not impose. There was a question, there was an answer.
    3. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 12 January 2018 12: 20 New
      +1
      Well, maybe some kind of indirect infa casting a shadow on the crystal-clear image ???
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 12 January 2018 12: 22 New
        +4
        Yes, crystal clear does not happen
    4. dvina71
      dvina71 12 January 2018 12: 20 New
      +2
      Quote: pvv113
      Why would such a reaction?

      From the fact that, under the name of the office, the dude is delirious .. He found 6t TNT on this boat and tore it into small parts ..
  2. Gardamir
    Gardamir 12 January 2018 12: 00 New
    +1
    She drowned.
    1. Dedall
      Dedall 12 January 2018 20: 57 New
      +2
      You also need to add a smile to this so that everyone understands what your comment is hinting at.
  3. novel66
    novel66 12 January 2018 12: 05 New
    +3
    very familiar position
  4. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 12 January 2018 12: 05 New
    +2
    Either he stole, or from him, but something was bad. Why are you bustling about something? Nobody said anything, but everyone thought. As one of the options - the dullness of the American Moreman, everyone knows.
  5. Vard
    Vard 12 January 2018 12: 07 New
    0
    The poor ... they are poor ... now now the place where the tail grows will feel what a soundly worked fake is ...
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 January 2018 12: 18 New
    +3
    The author of this report left the office a few years ago,
    But continues to "analyze" on behalf of the US Navy intelligence agency? Isn't it strange?
  7. Maz
    Maz 12 January 2018 12: 40 New
    0
    Shaw was required to prove .. Even the Americans disown
  8. Maz
    Maz 12 January 2018 12: 42 New
    0
    Quote: Vard
    The poor ... they are poor ... now now the place where the tail grows will feel what a soundly worked fake is ...

    That's just about soundly very doubtful.
  9. olegator
    olegator 12 January 2018 20: 18 New
    +1
    How is it even physically possible to “completely destroy” such a solid structure in such a short period of time? Damage and flooding - this is understandable. But “the submarine’s hull was completely destroyed in about 40 milliseconds” ... Either the inaccurate wording, or destroyed with something completely new.