Combat reserve: what will happen if the US is touched by Russian assets

100
Combat reserve: what will happen if the US is touched by Russian assets


If we take into account the current relations between the two countries, the Bank of Russia’s investments in dollar assets look risky. However, if, in connection with the sanctions, Russian gold and foreign exchange assets are frozen, it will be a declaration of war. This opinion was given to Pravda.Ru by Mikhail Khazin, President of the Economic Research Foundation, economist and publicist.
- About a third of the Bank of Russia's gold and foreign exchange assets are located in the United States. Can they be frozen due to new sanctions?



- Theoretically, yes, of course, Kazakhstan is an example of that. Theoretically they can, practically, this is a declaration of war, and a declaration of war will immediately cause a whole bunch of various additional problems.

- And the US will go for it?

- We went with Kazakhstan.

- But we still have to look at the belonging of the Central Bank ...

- And here belong to the Central Bank? What does this have to do? This is Russian money. Only very naive people believe that someone in such matters is guided by such stupidity as the rule of law.
- Why we did not anticipate this development of the situation?

- It's a difficult question. The fact is that there are things that can be done, but they can be different. However, there are things that will be done, because you need to understand that both the government and the Central Bank are the people who always choose the IMF between the IMF and the interests of Russia.

- For what reasons?

- By virtue of their belonging to the liberal group.

- What then to do so that our money would not be frozen?

- This is a very complex system of maneuvers. Because if you remove these people, roughly speaking, you appoint someone meaningful instead of Nabiullina Glazyev, instead of Siluanov, this will automatically entail this very arrest. And for this reason it is very difficult for us to maneuver.

- But do you think it is possible to maneuver?

- Yes, it is possible. Moreover, the probability of this increases as the situation becomes more complex. The harder it is, the more it is swinging, the more opportunities for maneuvers.

- Experts argue that there is no point in refusing to completely invest in the United States, because this can bring down investment investment.

- The fact is that we need investmentrating for one thing only - to have foreign investments. In our economy, emphasis is placed on them. This is a mistake, because it is already clear that foreign investment is not gaining the volume necessary for the economy to function normally. For this reason, it is necessary to switch to domestic investment. In this case, the rating plays a supporting role.

In general, this system, in which we were purposefully planted, so that we would focus on foreign investment, which means that we need a rating and we must follow the rules, this is the so-called Washington Consensus system. It came up specifically for the former socialist countries.

Nobody forced us to join her, but now theoretically we should gradually get out of it. To do this, first of all, get rid of the liberal team in key positions. Because of itself voluntarily she will not do it.

- One more thing. Literally at the end of last year, the Central Bank joyfully reported on gold purchases ...

- Yes. We are constantly increasing our gold reserves.

- Stocks that are located in the United States, knowing the dangers of sanctions. This is strange…

- Already said. We have people for whom the interests of the IMF are more important than the interests of Russia. They actively interfere.

- And in the future will actively interfere?

- Of course! In fact, the economy is a continuation of power. And accordingly, the situation is that we need to maneuver as much as possible and prepare the ground for collapse. When the financial markets collapse, at that moment you can start clearing the Augean stables. The collapse of financial markets in the West automatically gives us a lot of freedom.

- That is, you need to start dropping stock markets?

“You have to wait here.” Until the stock markets collapsed, most likely, attempts to do something dramatically in our country will lead to extremely negative consequences. In this sense, we are held on a hook.

- Are we able to bring down these markets?

- No, it is absolutely impossible. And most importantly - it is very scary. Relatively speaking, this is about the same as jumping into Niagara Falls. Maybe you will come out, and everything will be fine, but maybe not. This is the case when everyone is scared and do not want to start the first to go into a fight. For this reason, everyone is waiting.

- A collapse is inevitable?

- Absolutely. There are various legends, for example, given the elections that will be this year in the United States. There, Republicans could lose a majority, and Trump could do this collapse. Again, what does “arrange” mean? He cannot collapse the markets, especially since he does not control them. But he can slightly increase the likelihood of this collapse, and when the situation is on a thin string ...

No one knows this system enough to understand when it will collapse. And for this reason everyone is afraid. If you make a sudden movement, everyone sees this, and the collapse does not occur, then you will be smeared on the wall. Fearfully. And if suddenly the collapse happens by itself ... This is a key place - everyone wants this to happen by itself.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    13 January 2018 08: 47
    It is urgent to hold an all-Russian referendum on the adoption of a law on the withdrawal of all Russian capital and investments from foreign assets. And, a change in the leadership of the Central Bank, its full submission to the laws of the Russian Federation.
    1. +13
      13 January 2018 09: 01
      Quote: GLIMMERING
      It is urgent to hold an all-Russian referendum on the adoption of a law on the withdrawal of all Russian capital and investments from foreign assets. And, a change in the leadership of the Central Bank, its full submission to the laws of the Russian Federation.

      Meaningless statement. Russia owes $ 100 billion more than it has in reserves. Therefore, first you need to close your debts, and only then ... In fact, it is impossible to participate in international trade and not have part of the reserves in foreign currencies.
      1. +24
        13 January 2018 09: 15
        Quote: Cube123
        Russia owes $ 100 billion more than it has in reserves. Therefore, first you need to close your debts, and only then ...

        And here is more detailed. What are you not confusing? Do you mix public debt with the debt of private companies?
        1. +7
          13 January 2018 09: 17
          Russia can not allow the bankruptcy of large companies with state. participation. Therefore, it will be necessary to pay off debts together.
          1. 0
            14 January 2018 20: 45
            We have the largest companies without debts, mainly a mountain of small ones goes into debt.
            1. +1
              16 January 2018 11: 47
              Yeah, that we even have Gazprom debts of 2,6 trillion. rub.
        2. +5
          13 January 2018 13: 23
          So now this is roughly equivalent, or do you still believe that the president is an independent figure?
          1. +1
            14 January 2018 07: 06
            Quote: lis-ik
            So now this is roughly equivalent, or do you still believe that the president is an independent figure?


            The one who has the most money is independent!

            Or none at all.

            But, in general, the Nabiulins and Siluvanovs must be removed by these strangers to Russia ...

            The only question is how? ...

            Do it quietly and painlessly
      2. +6
        13 January 2018 10: 18
        Quote: Cube123
        Quote: GLIMMERING
        It is urgent to hold an all-Russian referendum on the adoption of a law on the withdrawal of all Russian capital and investments from foreign assets. And, a change in the leadership of the Central Bank, its full submission to the laws of the Russian Federation.

        Meaningless statement. Russia owes $ 100 billion more than it has in reserves. Therefore, first you need to close your debts, and only then ... In fact, it is impossible to participate in international trade and not have part of the reserves in foreign currencies.

        The key word here is "part of the reserves" and the smallest one.
        1. +10
          13 January 2018 11: 08
          Quote: andrej-shironov
          The key word here is "part of the reserves" and the smallest one.

          Here everything is on the shelves:
          And about Strashnov-Post of Russia, as he is 95 million rubles. premiums returned, i.e. 361tys333rub per day
          1. +1
            14 January 2018 16: 02
            Stroporez welcome and happy new year! drinks I have already seen this video, but I think it will be useful to see others.
      3. 0
        17 January 2018 15: 58
        What nonsense! Russia holds exactly as much to participate in international transactions and be present on the IMF Council.
    2. +1
      13 January 2018 09: 27
      GLIMMERING
      It is urgent to hold an all-Russian referendum on the adoption of a law on the withdrawal of all Russian capital and investments from foreign assets. And, a change in the leadership of the Central Bank, its full submission to the laws of the Russian Federation.

      Oleg! You seem to have read the article inattentively. It says in detail that this cannot be done urgently urgently and why.
      1. dSK
        +14
        13 January 2018 09: 53
        Hello, Tatyana!
        Quote: Tatiana
        said in detail
        We are waiting for the "roasted cock" to arrive. He had already flown to Kazakhstan, today Nursultan Abishevich went to bow to Trump, to save his assets. Perhaps he will be promised something, depending on the "loyalty".
        1. +5
          13 January 2018 10: 01
          Hello Sergey!
          dSK
          Today, Nursultan Abishevich went to bow to Trump to save his assets. Perhaps he will be promised something, depending on the "loyalty".
          I also read this sad news at night. I agree with you completely.
          Moreover, now in Nazarbayev and Kazakhstan, Trump and Co. in Washington will have their pilot project to freeze foreign national sovereign funds in their American banks to the fullest, so that later they can also use it against R. Belarus and against Russia.
          1. +18
            13 January 2018 13: 02
            What to do??? In a situation when the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the Medvedev Government are conducting anti-state injections of gold and foreign exchange reserves into Russia into other states, and for the most part, in their probable opponent, as they used to say.
            Change the leadership of the Central Bank and the Government, comply with the constitutional provisions of the Central Bank on supporting the Russian ruble, and move away from speculative finance policies.
            In the future, change the legislation on the Central Bank, turning it from private to a state bank, with state treasury bills, as was the case with the USSR.
            Will the current President V. Putin do this, even with his re-election for the nth term? No, it won’t. He is satisfied with the financial policies of the Central Bank and the Medvedev Government, which he has repeatedly spoken about.
            What to do? To elect a new President in the election, capable of changing the current anti-Russian financial policy of the Central Bank and the Government. Fortunately, there is a real candidate to replace V. Putin - Pavel Grudinin with a patriotic socially oriented Left Front policy led by the Communist Party.
            1. +8
              13 January 2018 13: 13
              Will the current President V. Putin do this, even with his re-election for the nth term? No, it won’t. He is satisfied with the financial policies of the Central Bank and the Medvedev Government, which he has repeatedly spoken about.


              Populism, empty slogans that the Communists love so much

              Quote: vladimirZ
              What to do? To elect a new President in the election, capable of changing the current anti-Russian financial policy of the Central Bank and the Government.



              Do you think that the president in Russia is only needed to control financial policy?


              Quote: vladimirZ
              Fortunately, there is a real candidacy to replace V. Putin - Pavel Grudinin with a patriotic socially oriented Left Front policy, led by the Communist Party.


              Oh, that knows how to conduct financial policies.
              Remember his story about his accounts?

              Somehow it comes to some tight.
              Money abroad is needed so that foreign counterparties can work more comfortably with Russia
              Firstly, an indicator of the financial solvency of the state
              Secondly - a guarantee of return on invested funds in case of problems in the country

              And the gold reserve is stored in the country, a lot has been written about this on the Internet
              1. +4
                13 January 2018 13: 31
                Quote: vladimirZ
                In a situation where the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the Medvedev Government are conducting anti-state injections of gold and foreign exchange reserves into other states, and for the most part, in their most likely, as they used to say, adversary. move away from speculative financial policies. In the future, change the legislation on the Central Bank, turning it from private to a state bank, with state treasury bills, as was the case with the USSR.


                I remember very well how we lived under those rules
                In grocery stores (supermarkets) there are only boxes of matches and jars with huge cucumbers, and this whole "assortment" for the whole huge hall.

                Trade workers, OBKhSS, workers of household services (remember, “I have dry cleaning”), directors of vegetable bases (these flourished very well, because they did so much good to supply workers with fresh fruits and vegetables), and, of course, workers of the governing bodies of the CPSU flourished. .
                The latter were simply the highest caste.

                And Pavel Grudinin is just a modern Russian businessman, and what does the Communist Party have to do with it?
                He owns the vast majority of shares in the "state farm" named after Lenin.
                Leases land to businessmen, receives income from land leases by shopping centers in the Moscow region

                Somehow he turned out to be on the side of the Communist Party, and not the Growth Party, probably because there are enough businessmen there without him.

                And here - "State Farm named after Lenin", who is not in the subject, they will believe and cast their votes
              2. +19
                13 January 2018 13: 41
                Populism, empty slogans, - bulvas

                What kind of populism? Are you at least a little versed in economics, financial policy? Or so decided decided.
                Look at financial analysts, economists, now you don’t even need to read much. The basics of the financial and economic situation are described in numerous videos by leading scientists. In addition to S. Glazyev, there are V. Katasanov, V. Zhukovsky and others.
                What you write to service financial and foreign exchange and government trading operations does not have to be stored in foreign banks, especially in the United States, where they can be frozen at any time unfavorable for Russia.
                You that there are few stories with the banks of Cyprus, now Kazakhstan? A smart and thrifty owner will never deposit his financial money and wallet with a neighbor. So, only those who want to have something to do, or those who execute commands from there, from abroad, can act.
                1. jjj
                  +4
                  13 January 2018 14: 06
                  By the way, the candidate “from the Communist Party” urgently issued a “confession” at the CEC, in which he indicated that he had kept five billion rubles in the West in an Austrian bank and in securities and forgot about it, telling the CEC that he had no money, no assets in the West. And does this person want to lead Russia?
                  And about our money in America, it sometimes seems to me that we specifically send them there, moreover, in doses, but so much so that on occasion it would be possible to arrange a good schukher to the global financial system
                  1. +6
                    13 January 2018 14: 25
                    Quote: vladimirZ
                    What kind of populism? Are you at least a little versed in economics, financial policy? Or so decided decided.


                    Marked decided exactly
                    So that you do not hang noodles for people so freely


                    The Communists were 70 years old, they worked and worked, as a result they robbed the whole country, sold them to their main enemies for a penny (if only they had enough) and abandoned them. Now, on the remnants of former glory (which the Communist Party of the Soviet Union) they again decided to get to the trough, not by washing, so by skating.

                    The Communists could not find a better candidate than a businessman, congratulations

                    The Communists betrayed Russia and you propose to forgive them and give another attempt?

                    And betrayed because their economic policy was absolutely unsuitable and they could not

                    And there is nothing to frighten with economic knowledge after all.
                    1. 0
                      16 January 2018 11: 56
                      So:
                      1) Monarchists betrayed the country more than once, it does not fit.
                      2) The Communists betrayed the country, that's enough. And again, other republics developed much more than the RSFSR itself.
                      3) Liberals sold the country, also somehow does not fit.
                      4) The reactionaries are in power now and something is also living ... peculiar
                      And who is left with us to choose from? Chauvinists and anarchists? : d
                      1. 0
                        16 January 2018 12: 08
                        Quote: Dr_Engie
                        And who we have is left to choose


                        What Communists Are Not First

                        Rotten liberals a'lya 90s - also not good, especially since they left the communists

                        And what about the reactionaries who are in power now?

                        And what is “peculiar” when it is full of shops and when you can freely speak and do what you want and you can go wherever you want, open a business (if you can)?

                        What is "peculiar" ??

                        The mention of monarchists, reactionaries, and chauvinists is nothing more than a sign of a chatty couch "theorist."

                        And we must patiently educate young people, in the understanding that
                        "there is no truth on earth, but no more
                        Therefore, as you yourself will work, you will live
                2. +2
                  14 January 2018 00: 55
                  vladimirZ, you too suck muddy Grudininsky sisu? And how is it, expert?)) laughing
        2. +2
          13 January 2018 19: 39
          It is necessary for Kazakhstan to give “Satan” for the delivery to the USA of the Kazakh president and his baggage for 50 megatons.
        3. +6
          13 January 2018 23: 58
          Well, and more recently, we were all thinking, wondering why it suddenly Kazakhstan so urgently needed to switch to the Latin alphabet ... It turns out, nothing personal ...
        4. 0
          17 January 2018 16: 01
          There is nothing for the Kazakhs to answer, and, already, Russia has a ton of options.
    3. +8
      13 January 2018 15: 01
      Read the article above. The referendum will not solve anything. As soon as a decision is made to transfer reserves to their homeland, to Russia, their arrest will immediately follow. You can’t rush here. So far, our assets there need to be acted very carefully and very slowly, gradually removing them from the blow.
      The condition 1 for the transfer of assets to their homeland should be a gradual, not simultaneous, extended in time replacement of the liberal block in the government and the country's leadership. With a one-time replacement, assets will also be seized immediately.
      Condition 2 for the transfer of assets to their homeland should be a change in the functional affiliation of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation: on the reassignment of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation to the Russian state, the return of the Central Bank to their homeland, untying from control by the IMF, the World Bank, etc. This will require a change in the law on the Central Bank and, possibly, a change in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which should clearly state that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is the property of the Russian Federation, obeys the laws of the Russian Federation and acts in the interests of the Russian Federation, the government of the Russian Federation, the people of Russia.
      In this regard, attention is drawn to the preservation of such odious figures as Chubais on government posts. Why is this happening? ... Because until the reserves of the Russian Federation are returned to their homeland, while the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is under the control of the IMF and the Washington Regional Committee, Chubais cannot be touched, the losses from its isolation will be greater than the damage that it causes his presence in the state apparatus of the Russian Federation. It also means that the deadline has not come yet, the new 37 year has not yet arrived - the year of clearing the Russian elite from traitors. Everything has its time...
      In the dashing 90s, Chubais and his friends, supporters of the IMF and the Washington Regional Committee, drove Russia into a trap from which it had been chosen for 20 years and could not get out. And the reason for this is precisely because the key posts in the state are occupied by all representatives, followers of Chubais and companies.
      Russia's return to normal development, to traditional values, to the state’s concern for the welfare of its people, and not the IMF and the Washington government, just means the return of gold and currency reserves to their homeland and the liberation of Russia, the Russian state from ticks of world financial imperialism, and state apparatus from national traitors ...

      "People-State-Fatherland" - this is the slogan of every Russian patriot. A strong state, a united people, a prosperous country for centuries, which cannot be defeated by internal and external enemies.
      1. 0
        15 January 2018 16: 44
        Quote: The Truth
        Read the article above. The referendum will not solve anything. As soon as a decision is made to transfer reserves to their homeland, to Russia, their arrest will immediately follow.

        So this matter is solved very simply. As soon as the owners of the Fed seize reserves, they are given an ultimatum that if assets are not returned within 7, 2,3,5, 5 times (within which greed is enough), the whole territory of the school is covered with a bunch of pyrotechnics with SBN. After XNUMX days of squeals, and panic attacks at the mattress, the Fed owners will begin quiet negotiations on the multiplicity of the amount of funds returned and the incident will be exhausted, because the Fed owners will NEVER abandon their PARADISE LIFE and ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY over the world.
    4. +4
      13 January 2018 16: 50
      Quote: GLIMMERING
      It is urgent to hold an all-Russian referendum on the adoption of a law on the withdrawal of all Russian capital and investments from foreign assets. And, a change in the leadership of the Central Bank, its full submission to the laws of the Russian Federation.

      What referendum, did you read the article? Khazin chewed up the situation like small children, but no, some read and do not understand a damn thing. The results of the referendum, everyone knows in advance, but what's the point? A thousand sheep, can vote ten wolves, only the wolves don't give a damn about it. Your recipes from Sharikov, such as "take everything and share," are not appropriate.
    5. +1
      13 January 2018 22: 07
      Enchanting! simple and ingenious!
      The brightest thinker of the GLIMMERING era, you still have time to submit documents to the election committee, I will definitely vote for you!
  2. +8
    13 January 2018 08: 48
    "- Another point. Literally at the end of last year, the Central Bank joyfully reported on gold purchases ...
    - Yes. We are constantly increasing our gold reserves.
    - Stocks that we place in the USA, knowing about the danger of sanctions. This is strange…"

    Not true! We keep physical gold in Russia!
    1. +18
      13 January 2018 08: 58
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      Not true! We keep physical gold in Russia!

      Is it all? We have stored the gold that we buy here, on the account of purchases on foreign exchanges, another question.
      what will happen if the US is touched by Russian assets
      Not Nostradamus, but I predict that in this case Russia will declare its “DEEP Concern” and threaten to go to court, and WILL NOT GO, and here it will be “above” this ... And what else should people who use immunity on our border, without even presenting a diplomatic passport and carrying cash suitcases abroad?
      1. +2
        13 January 2018 09: 03
        Quote: svp67
        Is it all? We have stored the gold that we buy here, on the account of purchases on foreign exchanges, another question.

        But this is paper gold. And it may turn out that it is not worth the money that paid for it. This kind of “paper” gold can be stored in the USA, but this is not critical for Russia.
        But it is unlikely to be your way: we will return the gold and foreign exchange reserves if that. But most likely, the United States will not take such a step.
        1. +7
          13 January 2018 09: 10
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          But most likely, the United States will not take such a step.

          Somehow lately it has been calming a little ...
          1. +1
            13 January 2018 09: 13
            Quote: svp67
            Somehow lately it has been calming a little ...

            Personally, the presence of foreign exchange reserves in the United States does not bother me: my currency is not there, just as it is not in Russia! Yes
            1. dSK
              +1
              13 January 2018 09: 57
              Hello, Alexander!
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              the presence of foreign exchange
              Gold is only one third of the gold reserves of Russia. hi
            2. +3
              13 January 2018 18: 25
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              my currency is not there

              Are you not a citizen of the Russian Federation?
              1. +1
                13 January 2018 19: 21
                Quote: Karabin
                Are you not a citizen of the Russian Federation?

                I have more pressing problems that do not depend on the overseas uncle!
    2. +2
      13 January 2018 09: 03
      I want to hope, but you don’t believe in anything
    3. +17
      13 January 2018 09: 14
      SRC P-15
      Not true! We keep physical gold in Russia!
      Russia, at least - officially - does not hold gold in the United States. But it does not change anything. The Central Bank of Russia operates under the jurisdiction of the IMF, and is not subordinate to the President of the Russian Federation.
      In fact, all rubles in circulation are provided in US dollars, and therefore they cannot be printed without the permission of international banks.
      Thus, the ruble is a colonial copy of the American dollar. Not to mention the fact that Russia actually stores part of the currency in the form of dollars in the USA.
      In general, the Russian economy can be described as a complete dependence on external forces and the US dollar.
      What is the difference then, where is the gold actually stored? The difference is only if Russia has intentions to avoid or at least reduce financial risks from the fall of the American stock market and the American currency.
      1. 0
        13 January 2018 09: 18
        Quote: Tatiana
        . In general, the Russian economy can be characterized as follows: complete dependence on external forces and the US dollar. What is the difference after that, where is the gold really stored?

        Well do not tell! Gold is not dollars and it belongs to Russia, not to international banks!
        1. +6
          13 January 2018 09: 35
          SRC P-15
          Gold is not dollars and it belongs to Russia, not to international banks!

          The fact of the matter is that, given the current system of work of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which was included in the calculations in the IMF system, the American currency is provided, among other things, not so much with American gold, but with Russian gold and gold from other countries.
        2. dSK
          +4
          13 January 2018 10: 05
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          international banks
          How much they pumped out of Russia on the difference in interest rates through the Keri Tray pump is known only to the Lord God.
        3. +5
          13 January 2018 10: 21
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Quote: Tatiana
          . In general, the Russian economy can be characterized as follows: complete dependence on external forces and the US dollar. What is the difference after that, where is the gold really stored?

          Well do not tell! Gold is not dollars and it belongs to Russia, not to international banks!

          The situation with gold purchased domestically is even more interesting. It gives a double benefit. First, by buying gold and paying its producer, Russia "injects" money into its own economy and its own producer. Secondly, gold, which is placed in the gold reserves, allows you to print more rubles for this security. Those. also allows you to "inject" into the economy extra money. In practice, this is the only legal way for a country to "print dollars" regardless of the United States.
          1. +3
            13 January 2018 18: 30
            Cube123
            Secondly, gold, which is placed in the gold reserves, allows you to print more rubles for this security. Those. also allows you to "inject" into the economy extra money. In practice, this is the only legal way for a country to "print dollars" regardless of the United States.
            Not certainly in that way! Namely.
            According to the rules of the IMF participant, Russia cannot independently issue Russian rubles under any circumstances. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is obliged to first buy US dollars for its gold, and only in accordance with their quantity purchased print only a certain amount of its rubles. Moreover, the IMF regulator has the right to limit the amount of $$ purchase for both Russia and other countries. This scheme works for all countries of the post-socialist camp.
            Moreover, if we take into account that the IMF is a financial and political instrument of the United States (or rather, the US Federal Reserve bankers who privatized the United States themselves from the Americans), then the sale of $$ will not only be strictly controlled by Russia for the development of the Russian economy and its industry, but under any pretext to limit.
            1. +2
              13 January 2018 20: 43
              Tatyana, thanks for the info. But she is too new for me and at odds with my previous ideas. If possible, give a link to the source, please. As far as I know, emissions can be made both for the euro and gold. Almost any asset recognized by the IMF. I would like to clarify the situation. Thank.
              1. +2
                14 January 2018 02: 17
                Cube123
                Tatyana, thanks for the info. But she is too new for me and at odds with my previous ideas. If possible, give a link to the source, please. As far as I know, emissions can be made under the euro and gold. Almost any asset recognized by the IMF. I would like to clarify the situation. Thanks.
                Dear Andrey! You asked me a difficult task. The fact is that I have known about this for a very long time - I even have long-standing publications on indirect topics using this information. Therefore, it’s hard for me to send you specifically to the primary sources of this information right now in order to know exactly what it is definitely there. But I will tell you that Valentin Katasonov, Delyagin, and Glazyev and others have repeatedly spoken about this. I even began to forget some of the names of our economists who spoke about this for a long time, before that it had been so long ago.
                For example, you can read the works of Katasonov:
                1. Valentin Katasonov. About the percentage: loan, court, reckless. "Money civilization" and the current crisis. - M.: The House of Oxygen, 2014. - 704 p., With ill.
                2. And etc.
                Who does not like Katasonov, then I recommend the book of foreign authors in translation from English. in Russian:
                "13 banks that rule the world" by Simon Johnson and James Kwak with a foreword by Viktor Vladimirovich Gerashchenko. True, the book is large format, small print and thick - designed more for professionals. An ordinary person can just fall asleep while reading it.
                Foreword Gerashchenko
                Introduction: 13 Bankers and 13 Bankers.
                1. Thomas Jefferton and the Financial Aristocracy
                2. Non-American oligarchs.
                3. The rise of Wall Street: 1980-
                4. Greed is good: seizing power
                5. Best deal ever
                6. Too huge for a crisis
                7. American oligarchy: six banks
                ON THE EMISSION OF MONEY.
                The fact is that the US Federal Reserve is not at all the same Central Bank as the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (as ordinary people - “uninitiated” - are used to imagining).
                The US Federal Reserve is a collection of precisely the largest privately owned global banks (financial tycoons, which, in essence, have privatized the functions of the state in the USA), led invariably from England. I won’t go into details. But Robert Kennedy was killed in Dallas precisely because he encroached on the restoration of the sovereign right of the United States as a state to issue treasury bonds themselves, primarily $$.

                There are also many more videos. I don’t remember their names. However, I do not find something that I need to see visually as a memory on the topic, apparently beyond the limitations of their publications on the Internet. Search engines on the Internet do not give out the necessary information on demand.
                Here I’ve found something for you to simply certify you at least that such information does exist.

                The situation in the world. What are the media silent about? Posted: 8 Jan 2016
                (Issue of the dollar and pegging other currencies to it. See from 1 min. 22 sec.)
                1. +2
                  14 January 2018 07: 21
                  Tatyana, many thanks for the answer. But, what you listed, in my opinion, is much closer to conspiracy theories than to real life. I have already seen almost all of the above. Closest to the above is the position of Starikov and Fedorov, but their position, again in my opinion, is one-sided and does not consider the problem in a general way. It is interesting, but I would still like to be objective! source on emissions regulation .
                  In my opinion, money is just an objective "tool" for solving the problems of optimal use and distribution of resources. No more, but no less. They allow you to separate the "grain from the chaff" and get rid of many misconceptions about the world.
                  Just as an example. There is a common opinion that the West is robbing Russia, that there is a constant export of resources, capital ... But, if you look objectively from the financial side, the situation is reversed. To date, Russia owes the West $ 100 billion more than it has in the "capsule". One can argue about the efficiency of use, the inefficiency of spending, but, on the financial side, Russia "consumed goods" for $ 100 billion more than it could sell to the West.
                  1. +1
                    14 January 2018 14: 46
                    Cube123
                    One can argue about the efficiency of use, the inefficiency of spending, but, on the financial side, Russia "consumed goods" worth $ 100 billion more than it could sell to the West.
                    Andrey! Where did you get such information? What mechanism does this happen through? I fully admit that this could be through our dependence on the IMF. The IMF, as a supranational instrument of the United States in the form of global money-lenders, may well absorb the Russian Federation - just like Ukraine. Just the amount of debt of the Russian Federation (any country) goes over time into a change in quality. At the same time, Harvard and Houston projects are in operation. Nobody has canceled them in the West.
                    By the way, Fedorov himself definitely spoke about the issue of rubles depending on the purchase of $$ in one of his videos. I don’t remember the name of the video, I just remember the video itself visually. I will try to search. I can find it.

                    And as for one of the mechanisms, due to which money, from Russia, in particular, is shed directly into the capsule of bankers-usurers-globalists of the US Federal Reserve, see the article on migration policy that Washington imposed on the countries of Europe, Russia and others, except for itself.
                    Article "Financial risks of the national security of the Russian Federation from foreign labor migration" - https://topwar.ru/71406-finansovye-riski-nacional
                    noy-bezopasnosti-rf-ot-inostrannoy-trudovoy-migra
                    cii.html
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +1
                      14 January 2018 18: 28
                      Quote: Tatiana

                      Andrew! Where did you get such information?

                      The website of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation http://www.cbr.ru/statistics/?Prtid=svs&ch=it
                      m_42266 # CheckedItem
                      Section "External Debt of the Russian Federation": as of 01.10.17/536,659/XNUMX - $ XNUMX billion.
                      Section "International Reserves of the Russian Federation": the balance as of 01.12.17/431,636/XNUMX - $ XNUMX billion.
                      Quote: Tatiana

                      Fedorov himself definitely spoke about the issue of rubles depending on the purchase of $$ on one of his videos

                      Fedorov says a lot of things, and this is not always true.

                      We started a conversation with the fact that, in your opinion, Russia cannot issue emissions under the gold it purchases. This is the question I would like to get the initial information from the source. There is no such answer yet.
                  2. +1
                    14 January 2018 15: 29
                    Cube123
                    I would still like to be objective! primary source for emissions regulation.
                    The primary sources include the IMF Charter and its by-laws and decisions, the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Law of the Russian Federation on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, Art. 23.

                    Video "Who owns the ruble?" . Posted:

                    In order not to take notes of this video when listening, see the summary of this video "Who owns the ruble?" - http://kuzma-prutkoff.livejournal.com/369077.html
                    Here is another video on the same topic.
                    The Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the Constitution of the Russian Federation and how we are subordinated to the US dollar
                    1. +1
                      14 January 2018 18: 47
                      Tatyana, thanks of course, but I saw the first video last year, and now I’ve revised it again. And, in my opinion, the commentator is absolutely incompetent.

                      Yes, the Central Bank is not subordinate to either the president or the government of the Russian Federation. But it does not follow from this that he works for some other country. The essence of this system is that, if the Central Bank is subordinated to the government, then the government, which always does not have enough money, usually has an irresistible desire to turn on the printing press at will. And the country, after that, turns into Popandopula from “Weddings at the Robin” (Remember the classic: “Take it, take it. I'll draw it for myself again?”). And if a country is included in the international system of trade, such a situation is absolutely unacceptable. Money should not be printed by magic. Too many people depend on them. Therefore, a mechanism is created that prevents arbitrariness and voluntarism. About the same as the independent court system. When the decision of the judge is binding on everyone, and neither the Head of Government nor the President can dismiss the judge. And this system seems to me absolutely correct.
                      1. +3
                        14 January 2018 19: 58
                        Cube123
                        Yes, the Central Bank is not subordinate to either the president or the government of the Russian Federation. But it does not follow from this that he works for some other country.
                        Money should not be printed by magic. Too many people depend on them. Therefore, a mechanism is created that prevents arbitrariness and voluntarism.

                        But what about the Central Bank of the USSR under the USSR, not being a member of the IMF, perfectly worked precisely for our country ?!
                        You, Andrei, do not take into account that the IMF is Washington’s structural instrument and that the IMF has its own rules in the interest of maintaining the exchange rate of $ against other foreign currencies, which the Russian Federation with its Central Bank must comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation!
                        Different conditions draw different contents. The dialectic of the principle of changing the unity of form and content.
                      2. +1
                        15 January 2018 05: 47
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        But what about the Central Bank of the USSR under the USSR, not being a member of the IMF, perfectly worked precisely for our country ?!

                        Controversial statement. But what about the repeated monetary reforms that repeatedly put the population in a position ...? One of the reasons for the collapse of the USSR was the Pavlovsk reform, which confiscated a significant part of the accumulation of the population. What the population really did not like.

                        Quote: Tatiana
                        You, Andrei, do not take into account that the IMF is Washington’s structural instrument and that the IMF has its own rules in the interest of maintaining the exchange rate of $ against other foreign currencies, which the Russian Federation with its Central Bank must comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation!

                        Where, at least in one paragraph of the documents, did you see that the CBR is obliged to obey the IMF? And the ruble exchange rate with respect to $ has only one macroeconomic function - it is maintaining the balance of the country's foreign trade. If the exchange rate of its currency is overvalued, it becomes unprofitable to work by yourself, it is cheaper to buy abroad. But, this cannot last long, because at the same time, the country's gold reserves are spent up to their exhaustion. And this is the default situation. If the course is underestimated, it becomes more profitable to work yourself. But this is pointless in the long run, as at the same time, gold reserves begin to grow, which is pointless to build up above a certain threshold. Money should work. And it makes sense to keep them in reserve only to the extent that they protect themselves from force majeure situations.

                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Different conditions draw different contents. The dialectic of the principle of changing the unity of form and content.

                        "Spherical horse in a vacuum." An abstract statement that gives absolutely no guidance on real actions in a particular life situation. Dogma, not a guide to action.
                      3. +3
                        17 January 2018 14: 17
                        And when was the Pavlovskaya reform and in what connection?
                        On 22 of January of 1991 of the year, President of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev signed a Decree on the withdrawal from circulation and exchange of 50 and 100 ruble denominations of the 1961 model of the year.
                        The reform allegedly aimed at getting rid of the excess cash in circulation and at least partially solve the problem of shortages in the commodity market of the USSR...
                        And where did the shortage on the USSR commodity market come from? In connection with the departure from socialist construction to the prototype of capitalist relations - to self-financing.
                        The Soviet Union under Stalin was actually an economy. Planned housekeeping. But under Khrushchev, the famous Kosygin Reforms, capitalist concepts were introduced - capital intensity. Which actually led to a deplorable result.
                        Andropov supported the idea of ​​cost-accounting, and Gorbachev completed it with the initial accumulation of capital in the interests of the commodity mafia formed in the country. Inflation in the country grew due to an artificial shortage of goods and unused money in the hands of citizens who had nothing to spend on.

                        USSR: Commodity shortage (video chronicle 1989-91) Published: 20 oct. 2015

                        Plots tell about the destruction of products, spoilage, theft, hiding in warehouses, sabotage of unloading wagons and export from the country.
                        Taken in Leningrad, between 1989-91gg. (last story 1993g.), news team transfer "600 seconds."
                      4. +2
                        17 January 2018 14: 43
                        Cube123
                        Where, at least in one paragraph of the documents, did you see that the CBR is obliged to obey the IMF?
                        First of all, from the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 15, paragraph 4. Etc.
                        Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 15:
                        4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system.
                        If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply.
                        Those. if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “beyond the hill” and begins to complain to the international court there. And the international court of law takes precedence over our Russian one.
                        Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 7:
                        The Bank of Russia, on matters within its competence by this Federal Law and other federal laws, issues normative acts binding on federal bodies of state power, bodies of state power of subjects of the Russian Federation and local authorities, all legal entities and individuals in the form of instructions, provisions and instructions .
                        The rules for preparing regulations of the Bank of Russia are established by the Bank of Russia independently.
                        If the Central Bank decides to collect all metal money from all over the country, it can issue such a decree and everyone will be required to comply with it.
                        Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 21:
                        The Bank of Russia and the Government of the Russian Federation inform each other about proposed actions of national importance, coordinate their policies, and hold regular mutual consultations.
                        Reminds an agreement between two countries.
                        The Bank of Russia advises the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation on a schedule for the issue of government securities of the Russian Federation and repayment of the state debt of the Russian Federation, taking into account their impact on the state of the banking system of the Russian Federation and the priorities of a unified monetary policy.
                        As we see, the Central Bank does not belong to the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, and he only advises him.
                        Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 22:
                        The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to the Government of the Russian Federation to finance the deficit of the federal budget, the Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to finance the deficits of budgets of state extra-budgetary funds, budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local budgets.
                        If the state does not have enough money, it cannot take it from the Central Bank. The state may go bankrupt when the basements of the Central Bank are clogged with gold and currency.
                        But the law does not say that the Central Bank cannot lend to other states.
                        Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 23:
                        Federal budget funds and funds of state extra-budgetary funds are stored in the Bank of Russia, unless otherwise provided by federal laws.
                        The Central Bank is independent, not liable for obligations, but all state money goes to it.
                        The powers of the Bank of Russia to service the state debt of the Russian Federation are determined by federal laws. The Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, if necessary, conclude agreements on the above operations on behalf of the Government of the Russian Federation.
                        If the Government of the Russian Federation wants to do something in the financial sector, but it itself cannot. Because the money is all in the Central Bank, and he disposes of it. The government asks the Ministry of Finance to conclude an agreement with the Central Bank and only when they agree do they begin to work together. And if you don’t agree?
                    2. +1
                      17 January 2018 10: 25
                      I did not watch this particular video ... But I looked and read enough on the topic.
                      The Central Bank of the Russian Federation, unlike the Fed, is initially a state structure. It is subject to the laws of the Russian Federation, its leadership is appointed by the Duma and the President of the Russian Federation, etc.
                      The Central Bank of the Russian Federation can do whatever it takes, including lending to the budget, etc., if the DUMA so desires, because, for example, the law on the budget of the Russian Federation is the LAW and the Central Bank leadership is obliged to comply with it - this is written in almost every line of the law on Central Bank
                      The collision with the Central Bank, led by a liberal official from the 90s, human flesh from the flesh of a liberal gang and direct subordinate of Medvedev (...) - Mr. Fedorov, is associated with a change in Central Bank policy in recent years. Today, it is the Central Bank that is fighting for the interests of the Russian economy in spite of the friends who are regularly satisfied with government liberals.
                      In particular, for almost ten years now, the ruble has been untied from dollar reserves.
                      1. +1
                        17 January 2018 13: 38
                        Philip Staros
                        Didn't watch this particular video ...

                        Well, look at this video with reference to our laws and their analysis. And then test your knowledge on this issue so as not to be mistaken on its essence. Business!
      2. +2
        13 January 2018 12: 26
        Of course, you will excuse me, but everything you wrote is from the series "Jews sold Russia." They would be ashamed to write like this so that they would not lose face. What jurisdiction do you know? I can recommend a couple of dictionaries
    4. +3
      13 January 2018 16: 58
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      - Stocks that we place in the USA, knowing about the danger of sanctions. This is strange…"
      Not true! We keep physical gold in Russia!

      Most likely, they meant foreign exchange reserves, not gold. In the end, what difference does it make on which accounts to store bucks, in Russian banks, or American ones. In any case, currency is someone else's money, and all of them ultimately are in correspondent accounts with banks of currency issuers. Namely in the USA.
      1. 0
        17 January 2018 10: 26
        This is the meaning of the gold reserves that it is FOREIGN money.
        But gold is another matter. It in Russia, unlike Germany and others, is stored at home.
  3. +15
    13 January 2018 09: 06
    The article echoes the Glazyev article! And openly calls the enemies of Russia! But from the name to the arrest - millions of kilometers and dollars!
  4. +13
    13 January 2018 09: 07
    What will happen? Yes, there will be nothing. Capitalism on the street. And it is not a sin to count other people's money. These are Amer’s trophies for the victory over the USSR.
    What can today's Russian zitzpresidents say to the Amer’s cartridge?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      13 January 2018 18: 29
      Quote: apro
      What can today's Russian zitzpresidents say to the Amer’s cartridge?

      "Our American Partners and Friends" (C)
  5. +2
    13 January 2018 10: 02
    I don’t understand, you buy gold and keep it in the states, right? If so, I applaud your stupidity
    1. +3
      13 January 2018 12: 26
      This is the stupidity of the person who wrote about it.
    2. +6
      13 January 2018 13: 08
      Quote: gafarovsafar
      I don’t understand, you buy gold and keep it in the states, right? If so, I applaud your stupidity

      All our yellow stainless steel in the amount of 1800 tons is stored in Russia - Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kazan. So, be careful and applaud, do not beat your hands.
    3. 0
      15 January 2018 17: 02
      Not we (the people of Russia), but the oligarchy of the Russian Federation stores assets (state and personal) from the owners of the Fed.
  6. +6
    13 January 2018 10: 17
    They can and will go! But our government cannot refuse it, because on vassal terms it speaks with the West.
  7. +15
    13 January 2018 10: 57
    Freezing gold reserves in the West is an act of war, therefore martial law should be introduced in the country, diplomatic relations with the USA and the EU are broken, foreign assets are nationalized. All agents of influence of the West (Chubais, Kudrin, Gref and Co.) must be arrested, convicted and executed under wartime laws.
    1. +2
      13 January 2018 17: 06
      Quote: Northern warrior
      All agents of influence of the West (Chubais, Kudrin, Gref and Co.) must be arrested, convicted and executed under wartime laws.

      Ah, dreams, dreams. This was possible only under Comrade Stalin. Whether Putin is capable of this is not known, most likely yes. Stalin, too, after the revolution, for almost ten years, quietly fought against the enemies of Russia, which crawled into the government, after the 17th year. It’s open to challenge internal enemies, and the whole world imperialism that stands behind them, sorry, very, very. And then here are some "analysts" who suggest holding a referendum, and they think that the matter will be done.
      1. +4
        13 January 2018 17: 55
        I hope that at hour X Putin has the courage to issue such an order. The security forces and the vast majority of the population will support the cleansing of the country from the "fifth" column. The GDP has not just placed its people in all the key positions in the power structures, so decisive action should be expected from it very soon. Pro-Western muck must be destroyed at the root so that it is no longer on Russian soil.
        1. 0
          13 January 2018 18: 00
          So I am about the same.
        2. +5
          13 January 2018 18: 57
          Quote: Northern warrior
          I hope that at hour X Putin has the courage to issue such an order.

          At hour X, "partner" Putin dives, as usual, deep into the bushes. The first will be noted by Peskov with a speech, such as “you need to wait for clarifications, clarify the situation.” Then Lavrov will “deeply concern himself." And only after the lapse of time, if dear friends and partners do not graciously play back Putin will replay everyone asymmetrically, that is, by cancellation.
    2. +1
      13 January 2018 18: 33
      Quote: Northern warrior
      All agents of influence of the West (Chubais, Kudrin, Gref and Co.) must be arrested,

      Who will be arrested? Is it really a new Putin? laughing
    3. 0
      14 January 2018 01: 57
      Quote: Northern warrior
      Freezing gold reserves in the West is an act of war, therefore martial law should be introduced in the country, diplomatic relations with the USA and the EU are broken, foreign assets are nationalized. All agents of influence of the West (Chubais, Kudrin, Gref and Co.) must be arrested, convicted and executed under wartime laws.

      The glory of North Korea does not make Uzbeks feared? wassat The great Kymkin grandson was already insulated, it is impossible to look at this concentration camp without a shudder.
      1. +1
        14 January 2018 02: 43
        If war is declared to Russia, so far only cold, then it is necessary to counterattack. Nobody could win the defense war yet. Russia retreated for 30 years, having lost almost all its influence in the world, but the 14th year was a turning point. Now the West will not leave the country alone - it will push on all fronts until they see a white flag over the Kremlin or Russian tanks on the streets of their cities. The ejection of a white flag is the end of the country, Russian tanks in attack are the end of Europe.
        And yet, comparing the Russian Federation and the DPRK is completely incorrect. DPRK is a country with a population of 25 million people and a territory of only 120 thousand square kilometers, and Russia is a great power, a member of the UN Security Council, the first largest territory in the world and possessing the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons.
        1. 0
          14 January 2018 02: 59
          Quote: Northern warrior
          Freezing gold reserves in the West is an act of war, therefore martial law should be introduced in the country, diplomatic relations with the USA and the EU are broken, foreign assets are nationalized. All agents of influence of the West (Chubais, Kudrin, Gref and Co.) must be arrested, convicted and executed under wartime laws.

          That’s what you are proposing is just a retreat on all fronts, it’s always time to hide in a shell so that it scary waving rockets will always have time.
          1. +1
            14 January 2018 03: 19
            This is not a retreat, but a decisive step towards full sovereignty. If nothing is done, then 100% will be crushed, and a break in ties with the West will leave him no leverage over 1/8 of the land. If you destroy the entire "fifth" column, then the Anglo-Zionists will have only two options: to begin to take into account our interests in Eurasia or to start a war that will inevitably become nuclear.
            1. 0
              14 January 2018 04: 01
              Quote: Northern warrior
              This is not a retreat, but a decisive step towards full sovereignty. If nothing is done, then 100% will be crushed, and a break in ties with the West will leave him no leverage over 1/8 of the land. If you destroy the entire "fifth" column, then the Anglo-Zionists will have only two options: to begin to take into account our interests in Eurasia or to start a war that will inevitably become nuclear.

              Yeah, at the same time turn off the gas to them, block access to oil and happily put your teeth on the shelf, how many of you divorced then the strategists of the unpainted snake. crying
              Even for this poem, there is not enough passage about Kitaydrugpogrobzhisti and complete dependence on another "partner" is a joy for everyone laughing
          2. 0
            15 January 2018 17: 06
            Well, tell me what to do if the Fed owners wring out assets? Surprise with the greatness of HPP.
  8. +4
    13 January 2018 11: 55
    Well, in fact there are people who know the financial system enough to manage it. It is these people who control it. And the Fed for these people is just one of the effectors. Everyone is waiting for the system to crash. I will say when it collapses.
    This will happen on the day when the owners of the money decide that the Russians will no longer stand behind Russia for breastfeeding. Not earlier. But not later! Because, together with money, their debts will collapse, and writing off debts for yourself is the most urgent need for money owners. They have already converted wrappers printed by them into real assets (for example, they bought our energy), but the risk of uncontrolled decay really increases. So that...
    In general, time works for them, for our enemies. Our power is strangling us more and more. Yes, they gave us material wealth ... as fragile as snow in the spring. And this wealth is melting again, and faster. Under the weight of public policy. What gives rise to an appropriate attitude ...
  9. +2
    13 January 2018 12: 30
    Those who write about Kazakhstan’s money, frozen in the United States, apparently forget that they’ve been frozen by a third-party court’s decision in a legal dispute between Kazakhstan and another person who was not treated very well by Kazakhstan. So the example is unsuccessful. Any other examples?
    1. 0
      13 January 2018 23: 15
      Quote: Captain Nemo
      Kazakhstan itself

      and he did not declare war, as the author writes (equivalent to declaring war) the United States, and he is trying to settle the matter diplomatically.
  10. +13
    13 January 2018 12: 46
    There was such a fabulously rich Lydian king Croesus. He loved gold and pebbles very much. He ended up coming to a much worse Persian "business executive" Cyrus II, defeated the Lydians, took all these wealth into his hands, and Kroza burned at the stake. What is the moral? - Keep your funds in "YaRS", "Sarmatians" and "Clubs"! And invest in people, your little men, incl. "green"! They do not fit well, like fuel for a fire, in contrast to empty FSA treasury bills.
  11. +3
    13 January 2018 13: 54
    great ! key posts in our economy are held by people who have the interests of the IMF closer to the interests of Russia? or I'm completely behind the times or something is wrong! it's time to do something, you need to invest money in your economy and not the United States!
  12. 0
    13 January 2018 14: 22
    Quote: Cube123
    Quote: GLIMMERING
    It is urgent to hold an all-Russian referendum on the adoption of a law on the withdrawal of all Russian capital and investments from foreign assets. And, a change in the leadership of the Central Bank, its full submission to the laws of the Russian Federation.

    Meaningless statement. Russia owes $ 100 billion more than it has in reserves. Therefore, first you need to close your debts, and only then ... In fact, it is impossible to participate in international trade and not have part of the reserves in foreign currencies.

    Alas, the wars in Syria and Ukraine took away the entire Reserve Fund, as of January 1, 2018, it was completely exhausted .....
    On February 1, in accordance with amendments to the Budget Code, this fund will cease to exist.
    http://delovoysaratov.ru/news/economics/reserv-55
    6245 /

    By the way, the funds of Kazakhstan in the USA were frozen after two lost courts by Kazakhstan in Europe ...
    1. +9
      13 January 2018 19: 19
      Quote: alta
      Alas, the wars in Syria and Ukraine took the entire Reserve Fund, as of January 1, 2018, it was completely exhausted.
      Come on, tell tales. We are not waging a war on Urkain, and if we had fought, then everything would have ended faster than in Syria. Americans came up with these tales for Jews and Europeans. They are still storytellers. It’s not funny for yourself? What prevents the Russian Federation how in Syria to use the same VKS against the half-drunk motley shobla of the ukronatsiks and to put a couple of Calibers in the demoniac Rada, so that starting the massacre on Monday, on Tuesday afternoon, does not start new elections of an adequate president of Urquain? Why, instead of calmly moving troops to Durkaina anywhere on more than a thousand-kilometer stretch of the border, Russia treads around the Lugansk and Donetsk regions, especially when all of the Ukrinian people are bogged down in these areas? Say the strategist!
      1. 0
        13 January 2018 23: 20
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        What prevents the Russian Federation how in Syria to use the same VKS against the half-drunk motley shobla of the ukronatsiks and to put a couple of Calibers in the demoniac Rada, so that starting the massacre on Monday, on Tuesday afternoon, does not start new elections of an adequate president of Urquain?

        I'm afraid it's fantastic, there are as stubborn as you are (or maybe even more stubborn). I’m talking about Ukrainians, they’re more obstinate, and if you give them an incentive in the form of such “gifts”, they will first thank them for getting rid of the “evil power” and then they will fire at the Russian Federation. All this will end with a big blood of everyone and everything ... You can’t do this from the sofa.
        The author of the message did not specify above, for example, the contents of the Ordilo Foundation are on the Russian budget (funds), it is also money and not small. Crimea. And even injecting the Kremlin into Ukrainian partners is also money ...
        About the article.
        An example of Kazakhstan, even Iran, is unique, not entirely applicable to the Russian Federation.
        I'm afraid the shock of the battle club is also not a panacea for all ills.
        1. +4
          13 January 2018 23: 49
          Quote: Antares
          I'm afraid it's fantastic, there are as stubborn as ............... (in the text) ...... All this will end with a lot of blood of everyone and everything ... Do it from the sofa not allowed. The author of the message did not specify above -..... (in the text) ..... Crimea. And even injecting the Kremlin into Ukrainian partners is also money ...
          You see, Antares, I’m just one of those who are not inclined to science fiction, unlike dreamer "alta"who indiscriminately placed the label of "aggressor" on Russia, simultaneously tied to this "military expenses" drying up its economy .... I just made my case in the sense that in the event of a real war between Russia and Urkaina, it (the war) would have long been ended because the forces and means available to Russia allow this to be done with minimal costs and in the shortest possible time. Undoubtedly, we are participating in the conflict there (like the Americans), but we are not fighting there.
    2. 0
      17 January 2018 10: 29
      The reserve fund was created to be "exhausted" and precisely fulfilled its task. The total amount of reserves of the Russian Federation has grown over the past year by half a hundred billion.
  13. +1
    14 January 2018 00: 14
    We have only one liberal (Putin) and one liberal democrat (Zhirinovsky). That's enough. Those who export and direct (place) money in the United States do not commit a caming out (declare their political orientation), but (stupidly) realize the economic will of the US administration. Those who must oppose them probably just do not have power.
  14. +2
    16 January 2018 12: 52
    bulvas,
    It’s peculiar - this is when there are almost no jobs for young specialists with a salary of more than 12 thousand a month in the city, for example, positions with 3-5 years of experience, including department heads, get thousands of 16. This is “peculiar” "
    Astrakhan, of course, is not the largest city, not even a millionaire, but besides Gazprom, Lukoil and Russian Railways, there are no special salaries anywhere. Oh yes, also the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
    I know from my own experience that I received 11,5 in the posts of senior personnel inspector, in the press center of the city administration, with higher education and a bonus for service. That’s why it’s “peculiar”, because even NORMAL it is impossible to live on such a salary.
    And then they also call on families to create children and give birth, yeah.
    1. 0
      16 January 2018 17: 13
      Quote: Dr_Engie
      It’s peculiar - this is when there are almost no jobs for young specialists with a salary of more than 12 thousand a month in the city, for example, positions with 3-5 years of experience, including department heads, get thousands of 16. This is “peculiar” "


      Listen, the Communists taught people in Russia that the state cares about people, weaned them from initiative and independence.
      Everything would be fine, although I do not agree with this.
      The trouble is that after accustoming people to non-independence, the Communists threw these people into the abyss of freedom, and wild

      Try to complain about it in a country where there has never been such a concern.
      They’ll make fun of you, and they’ll twist a finger at the temple.
      I had to travel and chat with those people
      Believe me, it won’t occur to anyone that the state should give apartments to someone, provide jobs and other benefits of developed socialism

      In itself, all this is not bad, but no state can sustain such a way of life, in addition, it wears people out of the need to build their own lives

      With such a system, as we had in the USSR, there was no future.
      The initiative has died, labor productivity has fallen nowhere else, people spent all their energy on nonsense, by today's standards - where to buy sausages, find boots or jeans, etc.

      Another thing is that the transition was performed as it was, and not as it should
  15. +1
    17 January 2018 10: 19
    What was it? Again, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation someone "wrong" belongs to? Where is the proof of gold reserve in the USA? The main income of gold in the reserve is the purchase of gold mined in the country. Is he being carried across the ocean?
  16. 0
    17 January 2018 11: 04
    practically - this is a declaration of war
    The first to enroll in volunteers, strangle pindosavskih critters.
  17. +1
    17 January 2018 16: 04
    Quote: Tatiana
    And when was the Pavlovskaya reform and in what connection?
    On 22 of January of 1991 of the year, President of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev signed a Decree on the withdrawal from circulation and exchange of 50 and 100 ruble denominations of the 1961 model of the year.
    The reform allegedly aimed at getting rid of the excess cash in circulation and at least partially solve the problem of shortages in the commodity market of the USSR...

    Pavlovskaya reform was just confiscation. The amount not exceeding one thousand rubles changed for new banknotes. Accordingly, those who saved up for a car or apartment simply lost their money. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_reform_in_
    USSR_1991_year
    This is also indicated by the amount withdrawn - 14 billion rubles. I well remember what discontent (almost hatred) arose among the people. And this is one of the reasons why no one supported the Gorbachev government. And the country of the USSR in less than a year - December 26, ceased to exist.
    1. 0
      22 January 2018 18: 09
      Well, here, only on the ears we don’t need to rub. Yes, the reform was confiscatory, but if you exchanged the amount, as you wrote, above a thousand rubles, then you had to prove that it was your labor income, not speculative and not stolen money. Nobody lost their honestly acquired money; they were simply exchanged for new bills. But the "bugs" of course suffered, after the completion of the exchange often found discarded packs of old money. I had money on my account for a sold car, they were completely exchanged and there were no problems. Part of the speculative cash supply was cut off by this reform, and there was no discontent among the people (especially hatred), there was no need to post a lie here.
      1. +1
        23 January 2018 06: 50
        Cut off not so much speculative as the money supply, which surged from the fraternal republics after they began preparing for the introduction of their own currencies.

        I am glad that you personally did not suffer from this reform. But I have many friends who worked in various contracting organizations and who were mainly sitting at landfills, who lost the money that they put aside for apartments. Just because they could not return to the place of permanent residence in time.
  18. +1
    17 January 2018 16: 12
    Quote: Tatiana
    Cube123
    Where, at least in one paragraph of the documents, did you see that the CBR is obliged to obey the IMF?
    First of all, from the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 15, paragraph 4. Etc.
    Constitution of the Russian Federation Article 15:
    4. The generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system.
    If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply.
    Those. if the Central Bank in Russia is offended by a bad Government, it goes somewhere “beyond the hill” and begins to complain to the international court there. And the international court of law takes precedence over our Russian one.
    Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 7:
    The Bank of Russia, on matters within its competence by this Federal Law and other federal laws, issues normative acts binding on federal bodies of state power, bodies of state power of subjects of the Russian Federation and local authorities, all legal entities and individuals in the form of instructions, provisions and instructions .
    The rules for preparing regulations of the Bank of Russia are established by the Bank of Russia independently.
    If the Central Bank decides to collect all metal money from all over the country, it can issue such a decree and everyone will be required to comply with it.
    Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 21:
    The Bank of Russia and the Government of the Russian Federation inform each other about proposed actions of national importance, coordinate their policies, and hold regular mutual consultations.
    Reminds an agreement between two countries.
    The Bank of Russia advises the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation on a schedule for the issue of government securities of the Russian Federation and repayment of the state debt of the Russian Federation, taking into account their impact on the state of the banking system of the Russian Federation and the priorities of a unified monetary policy.
    As we see, the Central Bank does not belong to the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, and he only advises him.
    Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 22:
    The Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to the Government of the Russian Federation to finance the deficit of the federal budget, the Bank of Russia is not entitled to provide loans to finance the deficits of budgets of state extra-budgetary funds, budgets of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local budgets.
    If the state does not have enough money, it cannot take it from the Central Bank. The state may go bankrupt when the basements of the Central Bank are clogged with gold and currency.
    But the law does not say that the Central Bank cannot lend to other states.
    Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Article 23:
    Federal budget funds and funds of state extra-budgetary funds are stored in the Bank of Russia, unless otherwise provided by federal laws.
    The Central Bank is independent, not liable for obligations, but all state money goes to it.
    The powers of the Bank of Russia to service the state debt of the Russian Federation are determined by federal laws. The Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, if necessary, conclude agreements on the above operations on behalf of the Government of the Russian Federation.
    If the Government of the Russian Federation wants to do something in the financial sector, but it itself cannot. Because the money is all in the Central Bank, and he disposes of it. The government asks the Ministry of Finance to conclude an agreement with the Central Bank and only when they agree do they begin to work together. And if you don’t agree?

    Sorry, but I did not meet the abbreviation "IMF" in the above. So, you never answered my question.
  19. 0
    17 January 2018 17: 31
    To clean the Kremlin from those for whom the IMF is above Russia and its interests!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"