Taman Division rearmed on upgraded tanks

72
In the Taman mechanized infantry division, rearmament to modernized Tanks T-72B3, reported on Thursday in the press service of the Western Military District (ZVO).

At the Alabino training ground, the tank crews of the Taman motorized rifle compound, for the first time, will use the T-72B3 tanks of the latest modernization, to which rearmament has been completed in part
- Said the press service of the district.

Taman Division rearmed on upgraded tanks




The 2-I Taman Motorized Rifle Division is part of the First Tank Army (headquarters in Bakovka, Moscow Region). The army also includes the 4-I Kantemirovskaya tank division, the 6-I tank brigade and the 27-I Sevastopol motorized rifle brigade.

Earlier, in the ZVO, the First Tank Army was reinforced by dozens of modernized T-72B3.

1 November last year, the press service of "Uralvagonzavod" said that the corporation ahead of schedule fulfilled the contract for the supply of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation modernized tanks T-72B3.

Modernization has affected all major combat systems. The changes affected mobility, security and firepower. The tank is equipped with a highly automated fire control system, a multichannel gunner-type gun “Pine”, automatic target tracking, a more advanced 125-mm cannon, and increased ammunition to them, on-board screens of “Relic” type - with additional protection sets for combat in urban environments
- reported to the UVZ.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    11 January 2018 15: 08
    I think that it will be re-equipped with Armata among the first.
    1. +31
      11 January 2018 15: 12
      Not. She is among the first to be rearmament on the T-72B4.
      1. +15
        11 January 2018 15: 16
        Do you already "know for sure" or just diarrhea of ​​words?
        Quote: Looking Petrovich
        Not. She is among the first to be rearmament on the T-72B4.
        1. +6
          11 January 2018 15: 38
          Hello Dima ! hi
          Quote: 210ox
          Do you already "know for sure" or just diarrhea of ​​words?

          Calm down, friend - what if it’s an “insider” from the Moscow Region? wink lol
          1. +14
            11 January 2018 16: 33
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Calm down, friend - what if it’s an “insider” from the Moscow Region?

            Pasha is "Star Roots" Episode 6th "Attack of the Clowns" wink
            1. +2
              11 January 2018 16: 38
              Vlad, I haven't watched this parody yet - that's why I don’t know. lol
              1. +8
                11 January 2018 16: 40
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                Vlad, I haven't watched this parody yet - that's why I don’t know. lol

                But she doesn’t go on TV or in the cinema, every single day at the VO forum this parody and parody are observed. laughing drinks
                1. +2
                  11 January 2018 16: 42
                  Note: some actors are often made up. wink Today I already saw one such. Yes drinks
        2. +2
          11 January 2018 18: 57
          T-72B4 tank is a hypothetical upgrade from "sofa tankers"
          https://topwar.ru/49654-osnovnoy-boevoy-tank-t-72
          b4.html
        3. SOF
          0
          11 January 2018 21: 23
          Quote: 210ox
          Do you already "know for sure" or just diarrhea of ​​words?
          Quote: Looking Petrovich
          Not. She is among the first to be rearmament on the T-72B4.

          ... of course the second laughing
      2. +1
        11 January 2018 15: 50
        Very funny....
      3. 0
        11 January 2018 16: 10
        which twink by number?
    2. +5
      11 January 2018 15: 51
      Likely. T-14 will be sent to any elite armored forces ....
  2. +12
    11 January 2018 15: 11
    In the event of a mess, one of the first to go to battle.
  3. +9
    11 January 2018 15: 11
    Notice weelers, ahead of schedule ...
    1. +7
      11 January 2018 15: 18
      And where in the article about "ahead of schedule", muff, child? Again, run ahead of the engine, are you blessed ours? fool
      1. +11
        11 January 2018 15: 32
        Well, actually it’s written in Russian in white .....
        1. +11
          11 January 2018 16: 11
          Judging by his nickname, he just can't read Russian wassat
      2. +4
        11 January 2018 16: 01
        Quote: Bellum omnium contra omnes
        Are you our blessed?

        Oh brother or sister, you're already kidding people here laughing Deus autem nobiscum
      3. +6
        11 January 2018 16: 03
        Quote: Bellum omnium contra omnes
        And where in the article about "ahead of schedule", muff, child? Again, run ahead of the engine, are you blessed ours? fool

        1 November last year, the press service of "Uralvagonzavod" said that the corporation ahead of schedule fulfilled the contract for the supply of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation modernized tanks T-72B3.

        If you are so inattentive, there is nothing to run into others.
      4. +9
        11 January 2018 16: 29
        Quote: Bellum omnium contra omnes
        And where in the article about "ahead of schedule", muff, child? Again, run ahead of the engine, are you blessed ours? fool

        Especially for you
        1 November last year, the press service of "Uralvagonzavod" said that the corporation ahead of schedule fulfilled the contract for the supply of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation modernized tanks T-72B3.

        Until the end of the news should be read. wink
  4. +5
    11 January 2018 15: 15
    It would be better if they removed the T90 from conservation, and they were armed! am
  5. +9
    11 January 2018 15: 28
    The holes between the boxes DZ enchanting. Side screens - cardboard thickness.
    Protection was weak, and remained.
    It’s as if the experience of Syria, where T-72s are bundled in bundles (both the army and the militants) does not exist. sad
    1. +8
      11 January 2018 15: 38
      Alexey hi -Do not want to draw the proper conclusions from the Syrian company! With corpses and burnt tanks, the country can pay for such a spit! Not the same tank car to create a "budget" version of it! The tank version must be one - maximally protected! !!
      1. +9
        11 January 2018 15: 44
        Not the same tank car to create a "budget" version of it!
        Think narrowly. Here you are not a totalitarian scoop, you need money to buy treasuries and sell oil to partners.
        1. +12
          11 January 2018 16: 31
          Quote: Gardamir
          Think narrowly. Here you are not a totalitarian scoop, you need money to buy treasuries and sell oil to partners

          Pensioners then, pensioners forgotten laughing Already progress.
          1. +2
            11 January 2018 17: 18
            Already progress.
            I look at all the Kremlin’s marked General Colonels.
      2. +6
        11 January 2018 16: 02
        And I - to that. T-90 showed itself in Syria very well.
        Its survival on the battlefield is clearly higher than that of the T-72.
        They, of course, need to arm the Russian army.
        While Armata is not run-in.
    2. +5
      11 January 2018 17: 16
      Actually, on the boards of DZ Relict, and not screens. But there are no holes. This is not a T-72 at all.
    3. +6
      11 January 2018 17: 18
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The holes between the boxes DZ enchanting. Side screens - cardboard thickness.
      Protection was weak, and remained.

      Well, yes, of course, they personally ran this car or outplayed the tanks?
      Although what am I talking about, with such a flag next to the name the second option remains.
      1. +2
        11 January 2018 18: 26
        See for yourself. Here is the T-72B3
        And the gaps between the remote sensing and screens are clearly visible.
        For the kumma, 1 cm of unprotected surface is enough to go inside.
        1. +9
          11 January 2018 18: 39
          A normal tank, but DZ is not a panacea, after the first hit it doesn’t matter what flies, our tanks rode in 14-15 and didn’t fight, because people are fighting, not elements of protection, etc.
          About the T-72B3 I never heard any negative comments. Good and reliable car. No wonder it is used in tank biathlon even with us.
          1. +5
            12 January 2018 00: 58
            In tank biathlon he has no equal - I agree. Since they are not shot at him.
            But in Syria, even if you put a poster on the tank: “I’m the winner of the tank biathlon,”
            ATGM operator TOU does not tremble with fear. It will fire, and the tank will burn, as it has already been many times. For DZ to work properly, it is necessary that not only there are no gaps, but the boxes should even overlap each other. And without DZ kumm.straya 150 mm rocket passes steel armor without any problems.
            1. +5
              12 January 2018 01: 18
              They shot at Ukrainian tanks, and did not help them.

              1. +1
                12 January 2018 09: 36
                In Donbas, tanks often fought without explosives in DZ boxes.
                DZ requires careful maintenance. This is a moody thing. Therefore, Israel, the first to use DZ on production tanks (M-60), was disappointed with its effectiveness and for a long time did not use it. Only recently has a new generation of DZ appeared.
            2. 0
              12 January 2018 14: 35
              Quote: voyaka uh
              In tank biathlon he has no equal - I agree. Since they are not shot at him.
              But in Syria, even if you put a poster on the tank: “I’m the winner of the tank biathlon,”
              ATGM operator TOU does not tremble with fear. It will fire, and the tank will burn, as it has already been many times. For DZ to work properly, it is necessary that not only there are no gaps, but the boxes should even overlap each other. And without DZ kumm.straya 150 mm rocket passes steel armor without any problems.

              Enchanting nonsense ...
            3. 0
              15 January 2018 13: 13
              Quote: voyaka uh
              it is necessary that not only there are no gaps, but the boxes should even overlap each other.

              So they there and so overlap each other at an angle. The hole near the trunk has long been patched in new series. T-72b3 first deliveries and the last two different cars.
              Quote: voyaka uh
              And without DZ kumm.straya 150 mm rocket passes steel armor without any problems.

              Quote: voyaka uh
              But in Syria

              But the mat part must be taught in order not to carry nonsense on the net.
              In Syria, fighting export t-72m they have a monolithic armor tower i.e. stupidly a piece of steel.
              The Russian Federation and the countries of the former USSR are in service with tanks that were produced in the USSR "for themselves." In particular, the t-72b (of which rivet t-72b3) has a structure assembled from sheets and plates of rolled homogeneous armor steel and combined armor. By the way, the same essence in the armor and the t-90. An old roller where the tou arrives in the T-90 tower and the crew jumps out of the tank thinking that they are knocked out. So the rocket didn’t even get into the dz. Just to the tower. On the t-72b3 of the latest modifications there is also dz.
        2. +5
          11 January 2018 19: 20
          Quote: voyaka uh
          See for yourself. Here is the T-72B3
          And the gaps between the remote sensing and screens are clearly visible.
          For the kumma, 1 cm of unprotected surface is enough to go inside.

          This is an old B3. In the year 15 there was still no new modification. Why are you shoving old pictures?

          These are B3 2 years already as they enter the army.
          And let me remind you that DZ Relic is on board and there are no holes.
          1. +1
            12 January 2018 00: 50
            On your photo and my box DZ towers are exactly the same - take a look.
            The gaps were as they were.
            But in the protection of the sides there are differences.
        3. 0
          12 January 2018 14: 13
          Quote: voyaka uh
          And the gaps between the remote sensing and the screens are clearly visible

          Without Zionst fascists, we’ll figure it out and this is the old Seryukov’s modernization. Correct diopters, you have something with your eyesight.
    4. +5
      11 January 2018 20: 27
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The holes between the boxes DZ enchanting. Side screens - cardboard thickness.
      Protection was weak, and remained.
      It’s as if the experience of Syria, where T-72s are bundled in bundles (both the army and the militants) does not exist. sad


      On the headline of the article photo is "left."
      1. +1
        11 January 2018 20: 37
        And this photo is left. There are no screens on the MTO and relic on the sides.
        1. +5
          11 January 2018 20: 59
          Quote: Muvka
          And this photo is left. There are no screens on the MTO and relic on the sides.


          urban version of T72B3M (B4)
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        12 January 2018 14: 25
        Quote: kapitan92
        On the headline of the article photo is "left."

        Not left, this is the technique that was served and replaced
        http://warwall.ru/news/uchenija_tankistov_2_j_tam
        anskoj_gvardejskoj_motostrelkovoj_divizii / 2015-02
        -16-992? Utm_source = warfiles.ru
  6. +2
    11 January 2018 15: 28
    And in the photo T-90 .... or pumped T-72 already to its level?
    1. +7
      11 January 2018 16: 45
      So you seem to be not the first day at VO, but just now noticed that the photos for the article often do not correspond to the content? wink Regards (no irony) hi
      1. 0
        11 January 2018 17: 06
        It is clear that my koment has not been read to the end, I’m talking more about the new Contact-5 DZ, which, from last year, should be put on all modernized B3. And of course the photo is not that.
        1. +4
          11 January 2018 19: 58
          on the new B3 is a Relic.
          1. 0
            12 January 2018 08: 17
            The Relic should be put, but all 17 put Contact-5.
      2. 0
        12 January 2018 14: 47
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        So you seem to be not the first day at VO, but just now noticed that the photos for the article often do not correspond to the content? wink Regards (no irony) hi

        Here you are not the first day either, but you didn’t learn to check ... This is not a left photo, but what you served on before the replacement, photo from the exercises http://warwall.ru/news/uchenija_tankistov_2_j_tam
        anskoj_gvardejskoj_motostrelkovoj_divizii / 2015-02
        -16-992? Utm_source = warfiles.ru
  7. 0
    11 January 2018 15: 31
    in the same place there were also T-90s in service
  8. +2
    11 January 2018 15: 32
    control
    1st Guards Motorized Rifle Sevastopol Red Banner Order of Alexander Nevsky Regiment, military unit 31135 (village Kalininets);
    15th Guards Motorized Rifle Shavlinsky Order of Lenin Red Banner Regiment, military unit 31134 (Kalininets settlement);
    1st Guards Tank Chertkovsky Red Banner, twice the Order of Lenin, the Orders of Suvorov, Kutuzov and Bogdan Khmelnytsky Regiment named after Marshal of Armored Forces M.E. Katukov, military unit 58190 (Kalininets);
    The 147th guards self-propelled artillery Simferopol Red Banner Orders of the Suvorov, Kutuzov and Alexander Nevsky Regiment, military unit 73966 (n. Kalininets);
    1117th anti-aircraft missile regiment, military unit 51382 (the village of Golitsino, Odintsovo district of the Moscow region) (on the 9K331 Tor-M1-2U air defense system);
    1174th separate anti-tank artillery division, military unit 51381 (Kalininets settlement);
    136th separate guards reconnaissance battalion, military unit 51387 (Kalininets settlement);
    211st separate guards engineering and combat engineer battalion, military unit 77707 (Kalininets settlement);
    47th Separate Guard Communications Battalion, military unit 56139 (Kalininets settlement);
    1063rd separate material support battalion, military unit 56166 (Kalininets settlement);
    370th separate medical battalion, military unit 57062 (n. Kalininets);
    Separate UAV company (Kalininets settlement);
    Separate company of electronic warfare (p. Kalininets);
    Separate company RHBZ (n. Kalininets);
    Separate evacuation company (Kalininets settlement).
    1. 0
      11 January 2018 22: 54
      15th Guards Motorized Rifle Shavlinsky Order of Lenin Red Banner Regiment, military unit 31134 (Kalininets settlement); regiment, which served as an urgent after training in Kovrov.
    2. 0
      12 January 2018 15: 51
      In the USSR, in the motorized rifle division there were 3 motorized rifle regiments and a tank regiment. In the tank division, on the contrary, in the GSVG there were tank divisions: 2 motorized rifle regiments and 2 tank divisions. There were tank divisions of the 87th year model, i.e. in every small and medium business there was a tank company, reconnaissance platoon, mortar battery, this was a force. Chertkovsky the Red Banner, twice the Order of Lenin, the Orders of Suvorov, Kutuzov and Bogdan Khmelnytsky Regiment named after Marshal of Armored Forces M.E. Katukov, last place in the GSVG Zeitkhayn 1th Armored Division (Riesa), as commander Colonel Harlanov told us more than orders only in 9th Guards. tank regiment them. Suhe Bator, 44 orders at the expense of the Mongols. My military youth ...........................
  9. +4
    11 January 2018 15: 39
    Now, if she had a breakthrough at least at T90, Vladimir, I would still have been glad, and so, it would only be saddened by the fact that we are proud of the new patches on the old pants ... (although maybe we have already snickered? ..)
    1. SOF
      +3
      11 January 2018 22: 00
      ... well, how much can you already on this topic ...
      Quote: tchoni
      Now, if she had a breakthrough at least at T90, Vladimir, I would still have been glad, and so, it would only be saddened by the fact that we are proud of the new patches on the old pants ... (although maybe we have already snickered? ..)

      ... there is a big 72-park. Throw them away ??? They started modernization by seniority, by age. Sawed under the new interior with the exterior, take on the 90s, which are also decent. In parallel, 80-ku redo. At the exit we get a cloud of modern cars, even the old versions of which, despite the stupid outlines of the "comrade" with the hexagon on the flag, no one has burnt packs in the BV in the foreseeable past. But, on the contrary, decently drove the American and German super-tanks - those that are potential opponents.
      It’s a pity Merkav, still, as an adult, no one caressed so that there was less nonsense. Well, yes, they have to understand that everything is still ahead ...
      But when under each crew there will be Rossinant, worthy of modernity, in case of non-training anxiety, then it is possible to rearm on Armature in an enhanced manner.
      ... understand, it is impossible, in the environment, holding an outdated rifle in your hands, to count on the imminent appearance of a blaster without taking care, for starters, about the machine ...
      1. +2
        11 January 2018 22: 29
        Quote: SOF
        There is a large 72-park. Throw them away ??? They started modernization by seniority, by age.

        The country is full of forest! - let's fight with clubs.
        Quote: SOF
        contrary to the silly sketches of a “comrade” with a hexagon on the flag, no one has burnt packs in BV in the foreseeable past. But, on the contrary, decently drove the American and German super-tanks - those that are potential opponents.

        a dozen wrecked lepadles and fifty abrash is it decent? belittling you. Do not tell the public.
        1. SOF
          +1
          11 January 2018 22: 50
          ... stupid with clubs, so NOT stupid people do what they do ...
          Quote: tchoni
          a dozen wrecked lepadles and fifty abrash is it decent? belittling you. Do not tell the public.

          ... and what did you find funny in this ???
          Just them, and packs.
          ... a dozen leopards, but in one place ... Of course it's ridiculous, which is why the Turks quickly hid them in the rear ... laughing ... and even our VKS was asked to help, so that the entire menagerie does not flatter.
          ... about the abrams, of which there are only fifty, in general I am silent laughing
          ... the public is actually laughing ...
          1. 0
            12 January 2018 15: 03
            Quote: SOF
            It’s stupid with clubs, therefore NOT stupid people act as they act ...

            Whose is that stupid? In my opinion it is very humane, environmentally friendly, economical ...
          2. 0
            12 January 2018 22: 33
            I do not argue that in this situation, the B3, in general, is a decent car. Moreover, judging by the last biathlon, where the Indians came from t90, b3 in skillful hands, he will not yield in accuracy or speed. The question is what security represents b3. And what will happen to the crew?
  10. 0
    11 January 2018 16: 39
    You write about the T-72B3, and in the photo T-90A
    1. Hog
      +2
      12 January 2018 02: 07
      An article about the division and in the photo, just the tanks (T-90) standing in service with it.
  11. +3
    11 January 2018 16: 50
    request Need to rearm on the T-90 Breakthroughs!
  12. +3
    12 January 2018 01: 22
    Quote: Spartanez300
    I think that it will be re-equipped with Armata among the first.

    We had no money for the T-90 and there is no rearmament, and you are talking about Armata, which is like the heels of the T-90. You think that all these changes of 72 and 80 from a good life? Armata in metal appeared in 2013 yet. Since then, only in parades and see. What year is it in the yard now? And do not just talk about the break-in. If it were a normal, finished product at an adequate price, they would already have begun deliveries to the army. And nothing is heard about them. We made a noise about the “super-dupericality” and have already begun to forget. Either we are not pulling at the price of the machine itself and its further operation, or there are a million imperfections or design errors that cannot be eliminated in more than 4 years.
    1. +1
      12 January 2018 21: 04
      The bottom line is that despite all the tricks, the armata did not become what they wanted to see it - a tank of a fundamentally new formation, adapted for modern hybrid wars. She, like the old man T72, like all our tanks, starting, probably with BT, is focused on combined arms combat, mass use, etc.
      She is, if you will, an anti-tank tank. , (pun, however_,) And, in this respect it differs little from m, 72, Abrashi, Leclerc and others.
  13. 0
    12 January 2018 09: 51
    Quote: 210ox
    Do you already "know for sure" or just diarrhea of ​​words?
    Quote: Looking Petrovich
    Not. She is among the first to be rearmament on the T-72B4.

    ... comments have long been rated on the KVN scale - the funnier and more original, the more points - pluses ..
  14. +1
    12 January 2018 14: 39
    How interesting is it, even though it’s at least three times modernized, morally obsolete 72s, and the T-90 Papuans, who in any situation are several times superior to B3, in particular !?
  15. 0
    12 January 2018 16: 38
    I am concerned about the Taman division alone, the T-72B3 tanks and the neighboring Kantemirovskaya on the T-80, and this is in the same 1 Tank Army, this should not be so
  16. +1
    13 January 2018 00: 57
    A long time ago I did not go to this site ... I wanted to read the news about the Taman division, but I got here by reference. The same people and again the crowd bite one, you gentlemen dolbyotyty with large stars under the ava, what else (except this vomit on the Internet) do? With such confidence in their own righteousness, you’re carrying all kinds of garbage, as if you’ve just been present at a conference call with Shoigu ... They gave each other stars a bit too old!
    1. 0
      13 January 2018 21: 29
      Yours are beaten, well, you are not upset, he is a descendant of Sacher Masoch himself, who walks to beat him)
  17. 0
    13 January 2018 22: 30
    wait, wait! we still haven’t moved away from the twine of the volochkova, and here is the news.
  18. 0
    14 January 2018 22: 44
    Taman seems to be 80 whole. Maybe they should have been upgraded?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"