The date of the landing of the landing ship "Ivan Gren" moved

The state tests of the 11711 "Ivan Gren" lead landing ship will continue in the 2018 year, and only by their results will it become part of the Navy, reports RIA News message source in the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC).

Earlier, the head of the USC Alexei Rakhmanov said that the ship will be transferred the fleet until the end of 2017.

The lead landing ship of the 11711 project "Ivan Gren" will join the fleet following the completion of state tests,

the interlocutor said, without specifying the reasons for the postponement.

He stressed that “the ship will be handed over to the customer after the completion of state tests in 2018”.

Recall BDK "Ivan Gren" was laid in December 2004, launched in May 2012, the mooring trials began in October 2015. The ship proceeded to factory running trials in June 2016 of the year. The implementation of the state testing program began in the Baltic Sea on November 30.

By order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Yantar plant is building another ship of this project, the Peter Morgunov, which must be handed over to the fleet in the current year.

Comments

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Unexpected news . Never give up. Ivan Gren. As the saying goes - what do you call the ship ... and Ivan Gren at birth is Johannes Green, if anyone doesn’t know ... Viljandi, Estonia)) so for the ship with the Estoooon name the construction is quite controversial .. you look at 25 fleet))

[Leeds]

With the Chinese, completing the second aircraft carrier, we definitely can not compete ....

[Muvka]

Quote: Leeds

With the Chinese, completing the second aircraft carrier, we definitely can not compete ....

Rather im with us

[Dr_engie]

Well, yes, we do not need anything else besides nuclear weapons. You can build nothing at all.

[Muvka]

Well, only radars. To understand where it flies or floats, and to whom to send an answer. Personally, I think it is right that we rely on nuclear weapons. Instead of riveting expensive iron. That is why we have one of the strongest armed forces in the world at meager, on a global scale, costs.

[Krabik]

In addition to answering, one must also control, for this a regular army is needed.

And besides the control of the world, one must also give work to one's own citizens, and not sell steel over a hill.

[Blackmokona]

The USSR made almost all of these warheads; it had 60 thousand of them. And now much less remains

[Greenwood]

Quote: Muvka

Personally, I think it is right that we rely on nuclear weapons.

It’s strange. And why did the US and USSR forces carry out a full range of weapons all the way: both naval, land, and air ?! It turns out it was enough only to rivet nuclear missiles and measure their quantity.

[Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)]

> defense spending to GDP is higher than that of the us
> scanty costs

don't wake up, you won't like it here

[vlad66]

Quote: Muvka

Rather im with us

On nuclear charges, you can say “damn” the USSR, thought for decades to come, but on “Ivan” No words. One matyuga.

[Serg koma]

Data for 2012))))) Again - WHERE IS PARITY WITH THE USA ??? Or the mattress "overlooked"?

[Muvka]

Find newer. We will discuss. Although since then we have increased the number of strategic ICBMs.

[Serg koma]

Quote: Muvka

Find newer. We will discuss.

In "Funny Pictures?"
"Newer" October 21 2014 https://topwar.ru/60594-rossiya-i-ssha-sravnyalis
-po-chislu-yadernyh-vooruzheniy.html

According to September 1 data, Russia has 528 deployed nuclear weapons carriers; 383 media are still in storage. 794 deployed carriers are involved in strategic containment by the United States, and 118 carriers are in storage. Thus, there are a total of 911 carriers in the Russian strategic nuclear forces, and in the US - 912. This means that quantitative parity has appeared, although there is a serious discrepancy of a qualitative nature due to the large difference in the number of deployed media and their types.
By early autumn, there were 1643 deployed nuclear warheads in Russia. The strategic nuclear forces of the United States at the time of the collection of statistics had only one combat unit less - 1642. Thus, Russia and the United States have an equal number of carriers of nuclear weapons, and deployed military units. This parity was achieved for the first time in the last few years. The events of the nineties and the reduction of the nuclear arsenals of the former Soviet Union led to a serious change in the balance in favor of the United States. Subsequent agreements between Russia and the United States and a number of related processes led to the restoration of parity, at least in quantitative terms.

[Muvka]

And where is the accounting of tactical nuclear weapons?

[rodz]

If I am not mistaken, then the Chinese do not publish data on their warheads anywhere, however, like the Jews.

[tchoni]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

. Never give up. Ivan Gren

I mean, not to be part of the fleet? -)

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Quote: tchoni

I mean, not to be part of the fleet? -)

Yes, until it surrenders to the fleet.

[avt]

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich

Unexpected news

The long-awaited! It’s just the right thing to turn the song - ,, The Navy does not build our proud ,, Ivan "!"

[Bellum omnium contra omnes]

They made fun of the wise men over the deplorable state of the Fleet of Rasaskiskogo ...?

[vlad66]

Quote: Bellum omnium contra omnes

Mocked, wise men, over the deplorable state of the Fleet of Rasaskiskogo ..?

With what birth account Alexey IPC 105.

[Andy]

Aristarkh Ludwigovich Today, 12:47 PM New
Unexpected news. Never give up. Ivan Gren. As the saying goes - what do you call the ship ... and Ivan Gren at birth is Johannes Green, if anyone doesn’t know ... Viljandi, Estonia)) so for the ship with the Estoooon name the construction is quite controversial .. you look at 25 fleet))
-----
have Estonians stepped on your foot or pinched the “dignity” door? do not shift your stupidity to other nations

[Alexey RA]

Spawn this did not happen, and again the same thing. © HF

[Aristarkh Lyudvigovich]

Quote: Alexey RA

Spawn this did not happen, and again the same thing.

"Due to the constant changes in the project, the head BDK of the 1174 project" Ivan Rogov "was built at the Yantar Shipyard in the city of Kaliningrad only in the 1978 year, 14 years after the issuance of the TTZ."
Stability is an indicator of class!

[just exp]

here it is possible differently - and why am I not surprised?

[KVU-NSVD]

The transfer to the fleet of the long-suffering Gren will perhaps become a sensation

[Egorovich]

The deadline for "Ivan Gren" postponed. It seems that few people doubted it, it’s just a shame for the deceased, by whose name he is named.

[just exp]

it’s a shame for the industry, how many years have they been tormenting him for everything they still can’t pass?
but how did you cry out that Serdyukov bought the Mistral, how many analogs of the Mistrels we would have used?

[next322]

a real strong BDK ship has been built for 15 years ......... in 2019 there will be a chance

[Bronevick]

Ivanushka will be cut into metal for new helicopter carriers.

[turbris]

Well, why so sophisticated? Sailors do the right thing - in the combat structure of the fleet - only a fully combat-ready ship that meets all the requirements of the customer. And then you can’t wait for the factory workers to fix something, now it’s not a war and there is no need for rush in this matter.

[just exp]

haste? is it you so kidding or what?
Do you even remember how many generations of the population back Grena should have passed?
great-grandfather should still sing to us.
but they still can’t pass it.
(I exaggerate of course, but nevertheless they have already postponed the terms so many times that Gren has become a byword)

[turbris]

just exploit - I mean the stage of state testing, and not the stage of construction, which turned out to be such for obvious reasons and there is nothing to refine it in humor - there was such a time, but you yourself know everything.

[Vitas]

By order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Yantar plant is building another ship of this project, the Peter Morgunov, which must be handed over to the fleet in the current year.

That is, it may be so ... that the second ship will be included in the composition, faster than the first?

[faiver]

Well, here again, the standard slush ....

[senima56]

Yeah .... That's the second ship on income, but the lead ship does not give up!

[Kyrgyz]

On its base, you can probably immediately expand the museum

[kefan]

Lord, it feels like he will never be surrendered to the fleet.

[Every]

What is wrong with him again? If the problems of frigates 22350 are known, then what?

[Hadji Murat]

as always ...... failure to meet all deadlines .... in 1941 they put it against the wall ....