Military Review

The date of the landing of the landing ship "Ivan Gren" moved

39
The state tests of the 11711 "Ivan Gren" lead landing ship will continue in the 2018 year, and only by their results will it become part of the Navy, reports RIA News message source in the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC).




Earlier, the head of the USC Alexei Rakhmanov said that the ship will be transferred the fleet until the end of 2017.

The lead landing ship of the 11711 project "Ivan Gren" will join the fleet following the completion of state tests,
the interlocutor said, without specifying the reasons for the postponement.

He stressed that “the ship will be handed over to the customer after the completion of state tests in 2018”.

Recall BDK "Ivan Gren" was laid in December 2004, launched in May 2012, the mooring trials began in October 2015. The ship proceeded to factory running trials in June 2016 of the year. The implementation of the state testing program began in the Baltic Sea on November 30.

By order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Yantar plant is building another ship of this project, the Peter Morgunov, which must be handed over to the fleet in the current year.
Photos used:
http://bastion-karpenko.ru
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
    Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 11 January 2018 12: 47
    13
    Unexpected news winked . Never give up. Ivan Gren. As the saying goes - what do you call the ship ... and Ivan Gren at birth is Johannes Green, if anyone doesn’t know ... Viljandi, Estonia)) so for the ship with the Estoooon name the construction is quite controversial .. you look at 25 fleet))
    1. Leeds
      Leeds 11 January 2018 12: 47
      11
      With the Chinese, completing the second aircraft carrier, we definitely can not compete ....
      1. Muvka
        Muvka 11 January 2018 12: 50
        +4
        Quote: Leeds
        With the Chinese, completing the second aircraft carrier, we definitely can not compete ....

        Rather im with us
        1. Dr_engie
          Dr_engie 11 January 2018 13: 03
          12
          Well, yes, we do not need anything else besides nuclear weapons. You can build nothing at all.
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 11 January 2018 13: 05
            +1
            Well, only radars. To understand where it flies or floats, and to whom to send an answer. Personally, I think it is right that we rely on nuclear weapons. Instead of riveting expensive iron. That is why we have one of the strongest armed forces in the world at meager, on a global scale, costs.
            1. Krabik
              Krabik 11 January 2018 13: 12
              +1
              In addition to answering, one must also control, for this a regular army is needed.

              And besides the control of the world, one must also give work to one's own citizens, and not sell steel over a hill.
            2. Blackmokona
              Blackmokona 11 January 2018 17: 33
              +1
              The USSR made almost all of these warheads; it had 60 thousand of them. And now much less remains
            3. Greenwood
              Greenwood 12 January 2018 16: 03
              +1
              Quote: Muvka
              Personally, I think it is right that we rely on nuclear weapons.
              It’s strange. And why did the US and USSR forces carry out a full range of weapons all the way: both naval, land, and air ?! request It turns out it was enough only to rivet nuclear missiles and measure their quantity.
            4. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)
              Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 15 January 2018 17: 54
              +1
              > defense spending to GDP is higher than that of the us
              > scanty costs

              don't wake up, you won't like it here
        2. vlad66
          vlad66 11 January 2018 13: 14
          11
          Quote: Muvka
          Rather im with us

          On nuclear charges, you can say “damn” the USSR, thought for decades to come, but on “Ivan” request request request request No words. One matyuga.
        3. Serg koma
          Serg koma 11 January 2018 13: 15
          0
          Data for 2012))))) Again - WHERE IS PARITY WITH THE USA ??? Or the mattress "overlooked"? laughing
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 11 January 2018 13: 20
            +1
            Find newer. We will discuss. Although since then we have increased the number of strategic ICBMs.
            1. Serg koma
              Serg koma 11 January 2018 13: 31
              +1
              Quote: Muvka
              Find newer. We will discuss.

              In "Funny Pictures?"
              "Newer" laughing October 21 2014 https://topwar.ru/60594-rossiya-i-ssha-sravnyalis
              -po-chislu-yadernyh-vooruzheniy.html
              According to September 1 data, Russia has 528 deployed nuclear weapons carriers; 383 media are still in storage. 794 deployed carriers are involved in strategic containment by the United States, and 118 carriers are in storage. Thus, there are a total of 911 carriers in the Russian strategic nuclear forces, and in the US - 912. This means that quantitative parity has appeared, although there is a serious discrepancy of a qualitative nature due to the large difference in the number of deployed media and their types.
              By early autumn, there were 1643 deployed nuclear warheads in Russia. The strategic nuclear forces of the United States at the time of the collection of statistics had only one combat unit less - 1642. Thus, Russia and the United States have an equal number of carriers of nuclear weapons, and deployed military units. This parity was achieved for the first time in the last few years. The events of the nineties and the reduction of the nuclear arsenals of the former Soviet Union led to a serious change in the balance in favor of the United States. Subsequent agreements between Russia and the United States and a number of related processes led to the restoration of parity, at least in quantitative terms.
              1. Muvka
                Muvka 11 January 2018 13: 54
                +2
                And where is the accounting of tactical nuclear weapons?
        4. rodz
          rodz 11 January 2018 20: 14
          0
          If I am not mistaken, then the Chinese do not publish data on their warheads anywhere, however, like the Jews.
    2. tchoni
      tchoni 11 January 2018 12: 56
      +1
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      . Never give up. Ivan Gren

      I mean, not to be part of the fleet? -)
      1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 11 January 2018 13: 01
        +2
        Quote: tchoni
        I mean, not to be part of the fleet? -)

        Yes, until it surrenders to the fleet.
    3. avt
      avt 11 January 2018 12: 56
      +3
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      Unexpected news

      The long-awaited! wassat It’s just the right thing to turn the song - ,, The Navy does not build our proud ,, Ivan "!" wassat
      1. Bellum omnium contra omnes
        Bellum omnium contra omnes 11 January 2018 13: 06
        +1
        They made fun of the wise men over the deplorable state of the Fleet of Rasaskiskogo ...?
        1. vlad66
          vlad66 11 January 2018 13: 16
          +6
          Quote: Bellum omnium contra omnes
          Mocked, wise men, over the deplorable state of the Fleet of Rasaskiskogo ..?

          With what birth account Alexey IPC 105. fellow
    4. Andy
      Andy 11 January 2018 13: 12
      +3
      Aristarkh Ludwigovich Today, 12:47 PM New
      Unexpected news. Never give up. Ivan Gren. As the saying goes - what do you call the ship ... and Ivan Gren at birth is Johannes Green, if anyone doesn’t know ... Viljandi, Estonia)) so for the ship with the Estoooon name the construction is quite controversial .. you look at 25 fleet))
      -----
      have Estonians stepped on your foot or pinched the “dignity” door? do not shift your stupidity to other nations
  2. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 11 January 2018 12: 50
    +3
    Spawn this did not happen, and again the same thing. © HF
    1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
      Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 11 January 2018 13: 03
      0
      Quote: Alexey RA
      Spawn this did not happen, and again the same thing.

      "Due to the constant changes in the project, the head BDK of the 1174 project" Ivan Rogov "was built at the Yantar Shipyard in the city of Kaliningrad only in the 1978 year, 14 years after the issuance of the TTZ."
      Stability is an indicator of class!
    2. just exp
      just exp 11 January 2018 13: 43
      0
      here it is possible differently - and why am I not surprised?
  3. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 11 January 2018 12: 57
    +9
    The transfer to the fleet of the long-suffering Gren will perhaps become a sensation laughing
  4. Egorovich
    Egorovich 11 January 2018 12: 58
    +4
    The deadline for "Ivan Gren" postponed. It seems that few people doubted it, it’s just a shame for the deceased, by whose name he is named.
    1. just exp
      just exp 11 January 2018 13: 44
      +2
      it’s a shame for the industry, how many years have they been tormenting him for everything they still can’t pass?
      but how did you cry out that Serdyukov bought the Mistral, how many analogs of the Mistrels we would have used?
  5. next322
    next322 11 January 2018 13: 06
    +3
    a real strong BDK ship has been built for 15 years ......... in 2019 there will be a chance
  6. Bronevick
    Bronevick 11 January 2018 13: 15
    0
    Ivanushka will be cut into metal for new helicopter carriers.
  7. turbris
    turbris 11 January 2018 13: 19
    0
    Well, why so sophisticated? Sailors do the right thing - in the combat structure of the fleet - only a fully combat-ready ship that meets all the requirements of the customer. And then you can’t wait for the factory workers to fix something, now it’s not a war and there is no need for rush in this matter.
    1. just exp
      just exp 11 January 2018 13: 47
      +1
      haste? is it you so kidding or what?
      Do you even remember how many generations of the population back Grena should have passed?
      great-grandfather should still sing to us.
      but they still can’t pass it.
      (I exaggerate of course, but nevertheless they have already postponed the terms so many times that Gren has become a byword)
      1. turbris
        turbris 11 January 2018 18: 14
        0
        just exploit - I mean the stage of state testing, and not the stage of construction, which turned out to be such for obvious reasons and there is nothing to refine it in humor - there was such a time, but you yourself know everything.
  8. Vitas
    Vitas 11 January 2018 13: 22
    +1
    By order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Yantar plant is building another ship of this project, the Peter Morgunov, which must be handed over to the fleet in the current year.

    That is, it may be so ... that the second ship will be included in the composition, faster than the first?
  9. faiver
    faiver 11 January 2018 15: 42
    0
    Well, here again, the standard slush ....
  10. senima56
    senima56 11 January 2018 17: 52
    0
    Yeah .... That's the second ship on income, but the lead ship does not give up!
  11. Kyrgyz
    Kyrgyz 11 January 2018 20: 53
    +2
    On its base, you can probably immediately expand the museum
  12. kefan
    kefan 11 January 2018 21: 14
    0
    Lord, it feels like he will never be surrendered to the fleet.
  13. Every
    Every 12 January 2018 02: 46
    +1
    What is wrong with him again? If the problems of frigates 22350 are known, then what?
  14. Hadji Murat
    Hadji Murat 12 January 2018 15: 19
    0
    as always ...... failure to meet all deadlines .... in 1941 they put it against the wall ....