Military Review

Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA

110
In total, Norway will purchase fifth-generation F-52 fighter jets from the USA. About this on Thursday, January 35, said US President Donald Trump. He noted that the value of the contract is 11 billion dollars. The first combat vehicles were sent to Norway in November last year, reports RIA News.


Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA


Norway joined the F-35 program as a third-level partner in the design and demonstration phase. In November, the Norwegian Ministry of Defense 2008 announced the selection of the F-35 winner of the tender for the supply of new generation fighter jets to replace the 57 with the outdated F-16.

By June, the Norwegian Ministry of Defense 2017 took seven F-35A fighter jets, which are used to train personnel at Luke airbase in the United States. After the delivery of the first batch of fighters to the Erlann airbase, pilot training began in Norway.

The Norwegian Air Force intends to announce the initial readiness of the F-35A for combat use in 2020 and full readiness for combat use - in 2025.

The maximum take-off weight of the F-35 with a length of 15,4 and a wingspan of an 10,7 meter is 27,3 tons. The aircraft can reach speeds of up to 1,9 thousands of km / h, and its combat radius is 845 km.

The aircraft is designed using stealth technology and is capable of carrying nuclear weapon. The fighter is available in three versions: for the Air Force, Navy and the United States Marine Corps (with a short takeoff and vertical landing).
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
110 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. HAM
    HAM 11 January 2018 11: 17
    +3
    "Level Three Partner" - it sounds like that!
    1. novel66
      novel66 11 January 2018 11: 20
      +3
      yes they, in fact, are lol
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 11 January 2018 12: 12
      +9
      For some reason, everyone passed the phrase "by 2020 to the initial combat readiness, and by 2025 to full." That's what they will do for 7 years, because the pilots were trained before the purchase?
      1. Slovak
        Slovak 11 January 2018 16: 21
        0
        The budget will allow not only to buy, but also to operate?
        1. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 11 January 2018 20: 42
          +1
          They have a budget and can afford 120, just the point of a country with a population of 5 million 52 F-35 aircraft?
          1. Dreamboat
            Dreamboat 12 January 2018 00: 56
            +1
            This is a "tax for loyalty" or "file" - in Russian.
            Each vassal country must buy some F-35 to replenish the sovereign's deficit budget.
            And fuck them with these flying coffins, in which pilots thrush consciousness - this is the second ...
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 11 January 2018 11: 18
    +2
    Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA
    ... where did the money come from, Zin?! ... request
    1. Black water
      Black water 11 January 2018 11: 20
      +5
      a rich car indicates the presence of a tremendous loan)))) ...... well, or POPalizing))))
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 11 January 2018 11: 22
        +2
        ... will drive the mericatos of their vassals into even greater debts ....
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 11: 23
          +7
          Quote: aszzz888
          ... will drive the mericatos of their vassals into even greater debts ....

          And I don’t feel sorry for something norgov, from the word "completely".
          1. aszzz888
            aszzz888 11 January 2018 11: 24
            +3
            ... and I agree with you - died, so died ... laughing
            1. Going
              Going 11 January 2018 12: 11
              +4
              Quote: aszzz888
              Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA
              ... where did the money come from, Zin?! ... request


              They have enough money, and they will also sell old F-16s.
          2. Kasym
            Kasym 11 January 2018 14: 38
            +2
            Hello Pasha! I do not quite understand how they will use these F-35s. The United States has AWACS, guidance and detection satellites. And this will have to include AFAR, which immediately removes the issue of detection (why would they then this stealth). Then it’s better to F-16, 15, 18 - they will at least cost less and you can pick up speed more. Moreover, they are armed with the same as the F-35. F-15 and more BC can carry. Maybe they think that the USA will constantly push all the data to them?
            That Israel even has its own AWACS, but such countries need the F-35, I don’t understand ?! hi
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 15: 15
              +2
              Dauren, hello! hi Do you think the norgs themselves understand why they need this wunderwafer? Just the mattresses said "must" - the norgs trumped and rushed to fulfill. The Russians are already nearby ... belay lol
              1. Kasym
                Kasym 11 January 2018 15: 46
                +3
                Pasha, it amazes me that having the richest energy resources in the EU and the coolest sales market, their debt in relation to GDP (600bn) is 164%. Of these, public debt is 33% of GDP. There (in the EU) are there any normal buyers? No matter how you look, everything is in debt, like in silk - Germany has 2,2 trillion. Euro public debt. It turns out that everyone lives on credit, due to which it is not entirely clear. I do not really understand all these tricks with finances. It turns out that due to trust. Here to slam all these soap bubbles - it would be funny.
                Judging by the fact that they do not want to increase military spending, they themselves do not particularly believe in this threat from the Russian Federation. And the people fed fables for her. hi
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 15: 49
                  +2
                  Quote: Kasym
                  Judging by the fact that they do not want to increase military spending, they themselves do not particularly believe in this threat from the Russian Federation. And the people fed fables for her.

                  Golden words, my friend! good But against the star-striped owner, they are afraid to shove everything together. Why ???
                  1. Kasym
                    Kasym 11 January 2018 16: 07
                    +2
                    Maybe they will finally create a military Euroblock, but then the Germans and the French will register with the authorities.
                    And it’s understandable for the States - the Navy will be driven up and ... Actually, sometimes I myself am surprised at this deviation. The US in the EU has only three brigades (one heavy with the Abrams, two other light on armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles) and 7 dozen fighters. The rest is all troops serving and accompanying (transport, medicine, refueling, etc.) troops. Therefore, Trump shakes them for money in a common piggy bank - but especially the troops are not in a hurry to move the troops to "protect" the allies from Russia. hi
                    1. bouncyhunter
                      bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 16: 10
                      +2
                      I have long had the impression that the United States is a sado, and Europe, respectively, is a maso. recourse
                2. Korax71
                  Korax71 11 January 2018 20: 06
                  0
                  It’s necessary to look at the structure of these external debts. It’s mainly a loan. Because the amount seems so scary. And usually all countries give loans for development. Loans are redeemed and restructured over a certain period of time. they pay off part of the debt, they can still take a loan. This is now normal world practice.
          3. Incvizitor
            Incvizitor 11 January 2018 15: 49
            +1
            And I don’t feel sorry for something norgov, from the word "completely".

            Buying all sorts of "fu" they ISIS and other terrorist cells fsh sponsor, which is probably why. lol
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 15: 56
              +1
              An entirely acceptable explanation, but I am not sorry for them because they succumbed to Russophobic hysteria in the first place. yes
      2. xetai9977
        xetai9977 11 January 2018 11: 45
        16
        "Where is the money from, Zin?! .."
        For the Norwegians do not worry. They live much richer than you. Immeasurably richer!
        1. Lock36
          Lock36 11 January 2018 12: 40
          +6
          So Americans couldn’t get past such rich suckers laughing
          1. figwam
            figwam 11 January 2018 12: 59
            +1
            Quote: Lock36
            So Americans couldn’t get past such rich suckers laughing

            The Yankees always choose only rich suckers, otherwise you can’t get anything from them.
            1. Lock36
              Lock36 11 January 2018 22: 31
              +1
              In general, the Norwegians lived well until their Americans noticed lol
        2. Semen Semyonitch
          Semen Semyonitch 12 January 2018 06: 37
          0
          Quote: xetai9977
          Don’t worry about Norwegians

          Drops ... Let them ...
          Quote: xetai9977
          They live much richer than you. Immeasurably richer!

          Everything in this world is relative ....
    2. 100502
      100502 11 January 2018 11: 21
      13
      There, one of the highest living standards in the world
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 11 January 2018 11: 23
        +2
        100502 Today, 11:21 ↑ New
        There, one of the highest living standards in the world

        ... and the military budget is also the highest?
        1. Viktor.12.71
          Viktor.12.71 11 January 2018 12: 35
          +3
          Quote: aszzz888
          and the military budget is also the highest?

          1% of GDP or 6 billion
      2. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 12 January 2018 06: 40
        0
        Quote: 100502
        There, one of the highest living standards in the world

        Until then, quite a bit ....
    3. Sands Careers General
      Sands Careers General 11 January 2018 11: 23
      +8
      Norway has a lot of money. They can afford to buy such trash.
      1. VALERIK_097
        VALERIK_097 11 January 2018 11: 53
        +2
        Moreover, they have already designated a place of basing.
        12 villages (communes) will be covered immediately. But the priority is still Vardø. People don’t live in peace, they found adventures at their fifth point. They don’t understand that all the “mariyats” will go to the bottom first of all, Vardø with their radar will disappear from the globe altogether.
        1. Sands Careers General
          Sands Careers General 11 January 2018 12: 09
          +7
          They have no choice, the lord said - to buy, then wipe yourself and pay. But the inhabitants of Norway do not care.
    4. Vard
      Vard 11 January 2018 11: 25
      +7
      They have a trillion dollars in their type fund for future generations ...
    5. Krasnodar
      Krasnodar 11 January 2018 11: 27
      10
      Quote: aszzz888
      Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA
      ... where did the money come from, Zin?! ... request

      Norway is one of the richest countries in the world. For many years now, the first place in the HDI (standard of living, rude).
      1. VALERIK_097
        VALERIK_097 11 January 2018 12: 01
        +4
        there even the drunken police take home, then the truth is not taxoid billed.
    6. zyzx
      zyzx 11 January 2018 11: 28
      +6
      Well, the norgs in the reserve fund have about a trillion greens.
    7. tchoni
      tchoni 11 January 2018 11: 43
      +8
      Around from there, as with us. From the bowels of the earth. Gas, you know ... gas.
    8. dorz
      dorz 11 January 2018 11: 51
      0
      Quote: aszzz888
      Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA
      ... where did the money come from, Zin?! ... request

      Norway is among the five richest countries in Europe. And of course, the F-35 is a plane to attack us, not defense.
    9. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 11 January 2018 12: 09
      10
      "... where did the money come from, Zin?!" ////

      Money from oil. Norway’s population is small and
      they are thrifty people. Offshore oil revenue not
      handed out to the population, and sent to a special fund,
      who invests them profitably.
      At the same time, Norway was able to develop modern industry:
      scientific electronics, military industry.
    10. Viktor.12.71
      Viktor.12.71 11 January 2018 12: 11
      +5
      Quote: aszzz888
      .. where is the money from, Zin?! ... request

      They are in 3rd place in terms of GDP, 72 thousand cu per capita. They can afford it.
    11. Lycan
      Lycan 11 January 2018 14: 19
      +2
      "Norway is the largest oil and gas producer in Northern Europe." (Vika)
  3. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 11 January 2018 11: 18
    +6
    Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA
    not a bad deal ... and we, RD to the states ...
    1. KOH
      KOH 11 January 2018 11: 25
      +2
      You know how to spoil your mood ...))
    2. Korax71
      Korax71 11 January 2018 20: 11
      0
      Yeah. The price tag is not comparable. Our rd of 8-10 pcs a year is penniless, compared to 52 penguins. I feel ours after this news, my saliva will drown.
  4. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 11 January 2018 11: 21
    +4
    Quote: aszzz888
    Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA
    ... where did the money come from, Zin?! ... request

    Norway has a lot of money, the population is not large, oil and gas are swinging yes
    They can also afford 500 aircraft.
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 11 January 2018 11: 59
      +9
      so we pump oil and gas inadvertently ... and money also inadvertently ... only one huge BUT ...
      they have 10 billionaires and a trillion in reserve + the highest standard of living ...
      we have 40 billionaires (only officially, but how many shadows God alone knows) and only 400 billion. in a penny + 20% of the population in poverty ...
      1. Viktor.12.71
        Viktor.12.71 11 January 2018 12: 22
        +7
        Quote: kepmor
        20% of the population in poverty ...

        This is according to official data.
        This is just my opinion. The minimum number of beggars in Russia is about 64 million people. If the cost of living remained at the same level from the average wage as in 1999 - 59,6%, and not at the current level of 28,5%, then the poverty line of Rosstat would be determined at the income level of 20,3 thousand rubles . And this is not 20,3 million people, but 70,8 million people
      2. dik-nsk
        dik-nsk 11 January 2018 12: 28
        +1
        10 "alligators" per 5 million people, versus 40 ours with 143 million people, do you calculate the percentage yourself? Well, do not forget to estimate the difference in space, which must be provided with infrastructure ... what? not so bad already?))
      3. My doctor
        My doctor 11 January 2018 13: 01
        +1
        Quote: kepmor
        so we pump oil and gas inadvertently ... and money also inadvertently ... only one huge BUT ...
        they have 10 billionaires and a trillion in reserve + the highest standard of living ...
        we have 40 billionaires (only officially, but how many shadows God alone knows) and only 400 billion. in a penny + 20% of the population in poverty ...

        Really belay Firstly, what is the length of the border between Russia and the border of Norway, which should be protected? Secondly, what is the ratio of the territory and the remoteness of the settlements to which it is necessary to ensure normal infrastructure? And in the end, do not forget the difference in mentality of the European and post-Soviet people.
        1. kepmor
          kepmor 11 January 2018 13: 20
          0
          yes, you're right, no doubt ... especially in terms of mentality ...
          only it’s not about circumstances, but about the rationalism of the distribution and use of income from natural resources ...
        2. Korax71
          Korax71 11 January 2018 20: 18
          0
          Maybe I missed something, but in terms of developed infrastructure, it’s not about Russia now. One of the leading gas producing countries cannot properly gasify its European part. You can’t even speak about the Urals.
  5. pavelty
    pavelty 11 January 2018 11: 25
    +2
    Yes, the contract, of course, is fucking ... And they have money, do not worry about the Norwegians. We would have such a contract.
    1. Kent0001
      Kent0001 11 January 2018 12: 07
      +3
      ... we still have nothing to buy current and now there’s nothing special. The NB Fund has ended (they ate one small egg). Now have begun to eat the following.
      1. pavelty
        pavelty 11 January 2018 14: 09
        0
        I meant, on the contrary, to sell on lard)
  6. Vard
    Vard 11 January 2018 11: 26
    +1
    The news pleased ... The plane, which I was steadfast to, can’t ... barely flies ... our pilots have less trouble ... if something happens ...
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 11 January 2018 11: 48
      12
      Quote: Vard
      The news pleased ... The plane, which I was steadfast to, can’t ... barely flies ... our pilots have less trouble ... if something happens ...

      Yes Yes. Barely flying.

      Military Parity, 4 Jan. 2018 - The Office of the F-35 program announced that it has completed all tests on launches / drops of precision weapons from the F-35 fighter as part of demonstration programs.
      “Completing the weapon tests is an important step for the entire F-35 team, as we demonstrate the combat effectiveness of the F-35, which changes the rules of the game. The joint government and industry team overcame all problems and demonstrated outstanding collaboration in the field of weapon testing, its results gave our customers greater confidence in the capabilities of the F-35 weapons, ”says Jeff Babione, Lockheed Martin's Executive Vice President and F-35 Program General Manager.
      Since 2012, the F-35 integrated test group has successfully completed the 183 test for launching / dropping missiles and bombs from both the internal weapons compartment and external pylons at all required speeds, altitudes and maneuvers of the aircraft. The final test was performed in September when the F-35C successfully launched the AIM-9X missile.
      According to Lockheed, the team completed 46 real tests that convinced that all weapons fired from the F-35 could effectively hit targets with the necessary accuracy. On November 30 of November 2017, test firing from the on-board cannon of the F-35A version fighter was completed. 183 tests of air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons were performed, including AIM-9X, AIM-120, AIM-132, GBU-12, JDAM, JSOW, SDB-I and Paveway IV.



      1. Kent0001
        Kent0001 11 January 2018 12: 05
        +2
        The car is serious and modern, but with flaws. For example, the problem with pilots breathing in flight has not yet been resolved. There were also problems with cracking the glider. And the fact that he launches rockets well is what any, even cheaper aircraft should do well. Here the only thing you can’t argue with is that it’s a fifth-generation airplane that enters the BUILDING units.
        1. figwam
          figwam 11 January 2018 12: 14
          0
          Yes, this is an achievement! A combat aircraft can launch rockets and throw bombs, apparently they had doubts even in this matter.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 11 January 2018 12: 49
            +5
            From the inner compartment, not from the hangers under the wings, as usual.
            1. synthwave
              synthwave 12 January 2018 17: 57
              0
              The gun that didn’t shoot there is also in the inner compartment? The inability to use weapons is the problem of the dampness of avionics, and not the deployment of weapons. For some reason, 22 shoots from the compartments, but a later plane of the same company does not. Lol well, of course, the sewn cannot lie.
        2. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 11 January 2018 12: 48
          +2
          "For example, the problem with the breathing of pilots in flight has not yet been resolved" ////

          This is not related to aircraft. And the F-18 periodically pops up, and other planes.
          Some honored veteran pilot checked. His conclusion: "why are you tightening your jumpsuit
          on the pilot’s chest, so strangle them? Let people breathe deeply! " am
          1. synthwave
            synthwave 12 January 2018 17: 54
            0
            These are excuses for pancakes. Jumpsuit .. seriously? And yes, it is connected with the plane. At 18 and 35 different systems of oxygen equipment. And the fact that they do not work on different planes is another matter.
  7. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 11 January 2018 11: 27
    +4
    Quote: Vard
    They have a trillion dollars in their type fund for future generations ...

    To many readers, just write something recourse Objectivity according to comments somewhere around 50% no more, but the facts are not of interest what
    1. Tibidokh
      Tibidokh 11 January 2018 11: 49
      +3
      Quote: rpuropuu
      facts don't interest

      Interested in!
      Facts to the studio!
  8. 75 hammer
    75 hammer 11 January 2018 11: 27
    0
    Strange penguins in the Arctic, not in Antarctica!
    1. Dalailama
      Dalailama 11 January 2018 11: 53
      0
      beguiled the poles
    2. Kent0001
      Kent0001 11 January 2018 12: 01
      0
      They will settle everywhere.
  9. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 11 January 2018 11: 31
    +3
    Our MO note. 52pcs F-35 - this is serious, the more we are fine against whom they will fight in the event of a conflict in Europe
    1. Kent0001
      Kent0001 11 January 2018 11: 59
      +1
      Did you plan to buy a lope from us? 12 SU-57? Freeze the project and do not disgrace. Give the fleet money on the nuclear submarine, there will probably be more sense.
      1. vadsonen
        vadsonen 11 January 2018 13: 01
        +1
        Did you plan to buy a lope from us? 12 SU-57?

        How many Russian AWACS aircraft? And why do you need Su-57 without them?
        1. synthwave
          synthwave 12 January 2018 17: 34
          0
          What is the relationship between 57 and AWACS?
          1. vadsonen
            vadsonen 12 January 2018 18: 25
            0
            Feature of the Su-57 - in stealth. Those. he must conquer dominance in the switched off radar, and someone else “highlights”.
            1. synthwave
              synthwave 12 January 2018 18: 36
              0
              By your logic, he needs to remove the radar altogether. Not well, but what? 500 kg would save. And in the real world AWACS is rare even among amers. And the winner is the one who shines further with his own radar, has more long-range missiles, the best performance characteristics of the aircraft for the BVB, or one who outwits his opponent by picking up the radar off.
              1. vadsonen
                vadsonen 12 January 2018 18: 46
                0
                By your logic, he needs to remove the radar altogether

                Why go to extremes? After all, then you can remove one engine - let it fly on the second.
                And in the real world AWACS is rare even among amers

                There are as many as needed for the expected use of aircraft.
                And the one who shines further with his radar wins

                Then why stealth?
                The best performance characteristics of the aircraft in the BVB

                Then take the Su-35 - and fast, and maneuverable, and in the series already.
                outwit his opponent by picking up the radar off.

                Visually seek out, or what?
                1. synthwave
                  synthwave 12 January 2018 18: 58
                  0
                  Why go to extremes?
                  This is not me falling into. It's you all the battle with the radar turned off offer to fly.
                  Two engines give a heavy aircraft a good performance. It is heavy because it is big. But it’s big because you need to shove a big powerful radar there.

                  There are as many as needed for the expected use of aircraft.
                  They are much smaller than "as many as you need", given their air armada.

                  Then why stealth?
                  Stealth increases the detection distance.

                  Then take the Su-35 - and fast, and maneuverable, and in the series already.
                  They take it and will take it, as well as the SU-30 and MiG-35.

                  Visually seek out, or what?
                  Google what is OLS.
      2. synthwave
        synthwave 12 January 2018 17: 47
        0
        What is the "shame"? In quantity? There will be a series will be a quantity, but for now tests. But the nuclear submarines do not know how to fly.
    2. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 11 January 2018 15: 54
      0
      against whom will they fight in case of conflict in Europe

      And it would be nice for the Norwegians to understand against whom the “Iskanders” will fight or maybe poplar, in case of conflict.
  10. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 11 January 2018 11: 36
    +3
    contract value - 10 billion dollars
    I will not be surprised if new flaws begin to emerge during aerodrome operations at low temperatures or something like that. Norwegians fly these planes, so this is their problem. As for the Americans, only one thing can be said - well done, well-publicized their goods. Although Norway, as a project participant, was required to purchase.
  11. tchoni
    tchoni 11 January 2018 11: 45
    10
    Once again, congratulations to the LORD! Now NORWAY fighters of the 5th generation will be armed with MORE than our sacred power))) !!! Hooray, comrades!
    1. Dalailama
      Dalailama 11 January 2018 11: 54
      +1
      This is not a fighter, this is a light bomber, has long been retrained.
      1. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi 11 January 2018 12: 02
        +8
        Quote: DalaiLama
        This is not a fighter, this is a light bomber, has long been retrained.

        Quite a fighter bomber
        1. Dalailama
          Dalailama 11 January 2018 12: 09
          0
          Do not tell this. And google the "F35 light bomber".
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 11 January 2018 12: 52
            +4
            F - in the name means - Fighter.
            B - means - Bomber
            1. Dalailama
              Dalailama 11 January 2018 13: 28
              +1
              F-111 such a fighter
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 11 January 2018 14: 06
                +3
                F-111 medium-range interdictor and tactical attack aircraft
                Fighter bomber. Like the F-16, like the F-35, which
                is replacing-16.
                1. Dalailama
                  Dalailama 11 January 2018 14: 13
                  0
                  Well, where is the word fighter? attack is a
                  No, it doesn’t go, and your colleague has the word Sukoi written above with a small letter
                  1. voyaka uh
                    voyaka uh 11 January 2018 14: 15
                    +2
                    You, as I look, love to troll. Success hi
                    1. Dalailama
                      Dalailama 11 January 2018 14: 24
                      0
                      I definitely don’t like to feed them with myself. Google the "F35 light bomber".
        2. synthwave
          synthwave 12 January 2018 16: 19
          0
          There is nothing on this boradate vidos that can do instant 21. I still saw it about five years ago. These excerpts from the corkscrew test. Where is aerobatics here? And so it is the same fighter as MiG 27, Su 24, Su 34. They, too, can rocket air from air rockets. And here, just a radar is more powerful and stealth is present. At the same time, flight characteristics are BELOW 4 generation aircraft. The Americans themselves consider him a light tactical bomber. And he can destroy only ancient planes of all kinds of Bantustans.
    2. Kent0001
      Kent0001 11 January 2018 11: 57
      0
      They have more now. 7 times.
      1. tchoni
        tchoni 11 January 2018 13: 03
        0
        Quote: Kent0001
        They have more now. 7 times.

        Well, formally, we still fly 10 pcs. prototypes and samples for flight tests. So while we are conditionally cooler.
    3. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 11 January 2018 12: 10
      +1
      But, and the fact that this aircraft is not the 5th generation does not bother you? Of the five parameters, it does not go through two to be the fifth generation.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 11 January 2018 13: 17
        +8
        Actually, the parameters of the 5th generation are 11.
        F-35 does not pass only one thing - overmovement.
        Su-57 does not pass in three, at least, but it is rightfully included in the 5th generation.
        1. synthwave
          synthwave 12 January 2018 16: 24
          +1
          For starters, there are 11 options there. Since, firstly, a 5th generation airplane is a conditional term, and secondly, even if all the conditions of different countries are collected, 11 will not be typed. If you want to argue, list everything.
          Su 57 does not answer only one thing - stealth. And then partially. And at least 35 are not five in three. Maneuverability, thrust-to-weight ratio, maximum speed. And it’s not yet clear that he and the avionics are in charge of aerial combat.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  12. Monroz
    Monroz 11 January 2018 11: 48
    0
    Norway bought a few very few fighters; it needs to purchase 300 fighters to start, and this is only the beginning; then there will be large purchases in all directions, and when it costs a trillion dollars, you can calm down a little and on the exhale say YES we paid them.
    1. Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)
      Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg) 26 January 2018 16: 37
      0
      they have this trillion, do not worry)
  13. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 11 January 2018 11: 50
    +3
    To buy equipment from the Stripes for crazy money that will be used only in the interests of the Stripes - this is a business, I understand that ... Who has scared Norway so much that it has been impatient for her to buy half a hundred Fu-35s. What can half the same F16 cope with? Can refugees besiege? Or NATO colleagues put their eyes on Norway?
    1. Kent0001
      Kent0001 11 January 2018 11: 57
      0
      See my comment below.
  14. Kent0001
    Kent0001 11 January 2018 11: 56
    +1
    Very close to us are the next 35 fifth-generation fighters capable of carrying nuclear weapons. No matter what level of partners the Americans call the Norwegians, this is not funny. This is a very serious strike force and a real threat, and all this is EXCLUSIVELY AGAINST US. True, the input dates are somehow delayed, although they are in no hurry.
    1. Dalailama
      Dalailama 11 January 2018 12: 12
      0
      They are afraid of 1920 soon, as they were generally presented with Russian Svalbard.
      It is better if they immediately transfer the capital there.
    2. Alex-a832
      Alex-a832 11 January 2018 23: 45
      +2
      This is what I meant in the first sentence of my comment. The rest is a banter over the official occasion of the Norwegians to purchase such a lot of F35.
  15. sd68
    sd68 11 January 2018 12: 07
    +1
    and its combat radius is 845 km

    Indeed, the news laughing
  16. Labor
    Labor 11 January 2018 12: 10
    0
    In this case, a preemptive strike is needed.
  17. flicker
    flicker 11 January 2018 12: 17
    +2
    Norway bought the F-52 fighter 35 from the USA

    Really Swedes want to bend winked
  18. g1v2
    g1v2 11 January 2018 12: 25
    +3
    It is much more dangerous that, in addition to f35, the Norwegians also buy Poseidons. Accordingly, our submarines going to the Atlantic by the Poseidons will graze, and the surface fleet - f 35. There is nothing good in the news. A likely adversary of our Federation Council is seriously engaged in rearmament.
  19. Doubting
    Doubting 11 January 2018 12: 38
    +4
    Quote: aszzz888
    ... where is the money from, Zin ?!

    They are petrodollars not offshore poked wink
    In mid-September, the total value of the assets of the Norwegian "oil fund" The Government Pension Fund Global exceeded one trillion dollars.

    The fund, built on oil revenues and designed to guarantee the well-being of the people of Norway even after the oil runs out, has become one of the largest financial institutions in the world.
  20. Doubting
    Doubting 11 January 2018 12: 40
    +4
    Quote: Labor
    In this case, a preemptive strike is needed.

    Yeah, Norwegian tomatoes need to be banned laughing
  21. synthwave
    synthwave 12 January 2018 18: 08
    0
    Quote: tchoni
    They can have any number of such “5th generation fighters”. This trash will not help them. So just an excuse for all-crawlers to scream and type and show their "intelligence". "Look, I can count to a hundred and 52 is over 12." Lol, that’s Lalki.

    They can have any number of such “5th generation fighters”. This trash will not help them. So just an excuse for all-crawlers to scream and type and show their "intelligence". "Look, I can count to a hundred and 52 is over 12." Lol, that’s Lalki. And this popcorn also snapped up. ))))
    1. synthwave
      synthwave 12 January 2018 18: 42
      0
      Once again, congratulations to the LORD! Now NORWAY fighters of the 5th generation will be armed with MORE than our sacred power))) !!! Hooray, comrades!

      Above is the answer to this koment, cut and pasted incorrectly, lol.