Military Review

The UN Security Council opposed the easing of sanctions against Pyongyang

26
Diplomats of several member countries of the UN Security Council on Wednesday spoke out against easing sanctions against the DPRK in response to Pyongyang’s decision to enter into a dialogue with Seoul, reports TASS.




I do not think that someone is eager for this at this stage. We need them to stop their illegal activities,
said British Permanent Representative Matthew Rycroft, commenting on the possibility of lifting the sanctions on Pyongyang.

According to him, every provocative step of the DPRK deeply worries the world community.

We want these provocations and the buildup of (missile and nuclear) programs to stop, and the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula,
stressed Rycroft.

The meeting was convened at the initiative of Poland and Sweden, who offered to discuss the inter-Korean talks, the first round of which was held on January 9.

According to Swedish permanent representative Olof Skoog, this is “a significant event for the Korean Peninsula”.

Finally, good ones came from the region newsand we thought that all members of the Council need to know what was discussed at the talks,
he noted.

Touching on the possible easing of the sanctions, Skogg urged "not to go so far."

He was supported by the Dutch permanent representative Karel Jan Gustaf van Oster:

We welcome it. Dialogue is always key. At the same time, sanctions and all resolutions providing for these sanctions should be implemented as efficiently as possible.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 11 January 2018 09: 51 New
    +2
    ... not to see the northerners "indulgences", as well as to us ...
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 10: 01 New
      +2
      Hi, hello! hi The mongrels supported their owner, as always ...
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 11 January 2018 10: 05 New
        +1
        Pasha, hello! hi ... the mongrels have a predictable fate, but the fact that they end up badly means that you don't have to go to the pharmacy ...
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 10: 11 New
          +2
          Considering the "reliability" of mattresses as friends - there is no doubt. yes
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 11 January 2018 10: 01 New
      +6
      We need them to stop their illegal activities,

      A miracle in feathers who is this for you? Doesn't a sovereign state have the right to be protected from you? winked
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 11 January 2018 10: 14 New
        +2
        Vlad, hello be! hi drinks
        Quote: vlad66
        Doesn't a sovereign state have the right to be protected from you?

        They consider sovereign only those countries that dance to the tune of the United States. And everyone who has his own opinion is savages and terrorists. Here is such a "sovereignty". fool
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 11 January 2018 09: 54 New
    +3
    The Englishman spoke, before that the representative of the United States said her word. It all comes down to the fact that you (DPRK) will not only stop development and testing, but also destroy what has been created, and then we will see whether or not to lift the sanctions, even partially. Well, who will agree to such conditions? The Anglo-Saxons with appendages deliberately set impracticable conditions for the conflict to continue.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 11 January 2018 10: 10 New
      0
      I want to spit on this UNSC ... complete powerlessness to solve any problem in an honest way ... only sanctions ... only violence ... only deception of the world community ... these are the instruments of this UNSC ... a worthless organization ...
      it has not stopped any war ... has not resolved a single international conflict ... it has only driven problems under the carpet.
      It is striking that RUSSIA votes for the sanctions of the Anglo-Saxons itself being under the sanctions of the Anglo-Saxons ... some kind of theater of absurdity. belay
      1. karish
        karish 11 January 2018 10: 15 New
        0
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        I want to spit in this SOVBEZ ... complete powerlessness to solve any problem in an honest way ...

        Russia is one of the permanent members of the Soviet Bez.
        Honestly - what are you talking about? And how do you think - to be honest?
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        .only sanctions ... only violence ..

        This is the only thing that Sov .ies can do.
        The rest of the General Assembly - hundreds of resolutions - zero sense.
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        .only deception of the world community

        Russia in Sov.bez --- don't forget.
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        it has not stopped any war ... has not resolved a single international conflict ... it has only driven problems under the carpet.

        Why? For example, they kicked Saddam out of Kuwait.
        The war in Yugoslavia was stopped.
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        It is striking that RUSSIA votes for the sanctions of the Anglo-Saxons itself being under the sanctions of the Anglo-Saxons.

        Everything was confused in the Oblomskys' house.
        What sanctions of the Council of Bez is Russia under?
        1. rotmistr60
          rotmistr60 11 January 2018 10: 21 New
          +2
          The war in Yugoslavia was stopped.
          Have you stopped? And how valuable and at the expense of Serbian lives and infrastructure. You gave a bad example. He just speaks about the involvement of the organization by some well-known country and the helplessness of this organization. It is enough to wave a test tube with something unknown to attack a sovereign country (Iraq), gouge it completely and hang the country's leader.
          1. karish
            karish 11 January 2018 10: 30 New
            0
            Quote: rotmistr60
            Have you stopped? And how valuable and at the expense of Serbian lives and infrastructure.

            It seems that in that war they did not kill and the infrastructure was not destroyed.
            Or maybe you had to sit and persuade?
            Result - stopped killing each other -- It's enough. Without this, they were admonished for over a year.
            Quote: rotmistr60
            You gave a bad example.

            Wonderful - I was 3 times in Croatia, once in Serbia, 2 times in Montenegro - there is no war. Fact

            Quote: rotmistr60
            He just speaks about the involvement of the organization by some well-known country and the helplessness of this organization.

            No, she says that a war can be stopped by force.
            How it was - Desert storm, Abkhazia, CAR (at one time).
            Quote: rotmistr60
            ... It is enough to wave a test tube with something unknown to attack a sovereign country (Iraq)

            Of course, the fact that Saddam attacked and occupied Kuwait - you don’t want to remember this. wink
            Quote: rotmistr60
            gouge it completely and hang the leader of the country.

            Of course, in my understanding, Saddam should not have been killed. He is still more adequate than Iran, and served as a counterweight to it.
            But is it cynical to call a leader who has used military poisonous substances against his citizens (more than once)? Do not find negative
            1. rotmistr60
              rotmistr60 11 January 2018 10: 41 New
              +1
              Or maybe you had to sit and persuade?
              So it was necessary to bomb Yugoslavia, incl. Belgrade with NATO aircraft, contribute to its dismemberment, support exclusively the Muslim and Croatian sides ...
              cynical? Do not find
              Every country has a leader (president, prime minister, dictator if you like). Therefore, I call it as it is customary. And not cynically crying about the destruction of Jews in the 2nd MV and at the same time silently, and sometimes with pleasure, to watch how the Slavs in Yugoslavia and Muslims in the BV were destroyed?
              1. karish
                karish 11 January 2018 17: 31 New
                0
                Quote: rotmistr60
                it was necessary to bomb Yugoslavia, incl. Belgrade by NATO aviation

                Did you have an alternative plan?
                Quote: rotmistr60
                promote its dismemberment, support exclusively the Muslim and Croat parties

                Yugoslavia would have collapsed the way the USSR collapsed.
                An artificially glued country.
                The Serbs started the war, they were against the withdrawal of Croatia from the SFRY.
                Serbs started the war --- get it?
                Quote: rotmistr60
                Every country has a leader (president, prime minister, dictator if you like). Therefore, I call it as it is accepted

                Well, for you, maybe Saddam is a leader, for me he is a dictator.
                Each with his own.
                Quote: rotmistr60
                And isn’t it cynical to cry about the extermination of Jews in the 2nd MV and at the same time silently, and sometimes with pleasure, watch how the Slavs in Yugoslavia and Muslims were destroyed in BV?

                It is cynical that you just do not understand anything about this.
                Since the former Yugoslavia, there have been ethnic cleansings in the image of WWII.
                And the Serbs excelled in this more than Muslims.
                So, in order to end this genocide, NATO has come and bombed whoever is needed and may not, but stopped the war and the murder of the innocent.
                And stackimi like you they would cut each other to this day.
                As for the Muslims in the BV --- you don't understand nichrome in this - so don't bother with moralizing.
        2. Same lech
          Same lech 11 January 2018 10: 24 New
          0
          What sanctions of the Council of Bez is Russia under?


          smile Not the SOVBEZ but the Anglo-Saxons ... read the comment more closely ...
          most of the resolutions are being pushed by the Anglo-Saxon countries ... is it worth it to follow their lead.
          The war in Yugoslavia is not stopped ... it is just dampened and can erupt there as soon as the NATO troops leave ... the Serbs will never agree with the annexation of KOSOV.
          Hussein was kicked out of Kuwait ... then giving the go-ahead for the bombing of Iraq ... then giving the go-ahead for the bombing of LIVIA ... hundreds of thousands of people died.
          The presence of RUSSIA in the SOVBEZ, which voted for a no-fly zone with the bombing of LIBYA, very honestly belay ... I will never agree with the LADY who gave the go-ahead for this action of the illegal murder of thousands and thousands of people in this country.

          Until now, we are unraveling what the countries that are members of the UN Security Council have done there ... shame on this organization ... instead of peace, war is their principle.
          1. karish
            karish 11 January 2018 17: 37 New
            0
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            most of the resolutions are being pushed by the Anglo-Saxon countries ... is it worth it to follow their lead.

            who exactly and where is pushing, as well as (if this resolution is adopted by the Soviet without) - how does Russia vote?
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            The war in YUGOSLAVIA has not been stopped ... but only dimmed and may erupt there as soon as NATO troops leave there ... the Serbs will never agree with the annexation of Kosov.

            Here I am about that, it is worth leaving NATO and the war will begin again.
            I prefer the UN peacekeeping force.
            Do I think (you) prefer the peacekeeping forces of the Russian Federation in Abkhazia, do the Georgians never reconcile with its loss? wink
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            The presence of RUSSIA in the SOVBEZ voted for a no-fly zone with the bombing of LIBYA very honestly ... I will never agree with the LADY who gave the go-ahead for this action of the illegal murder of thousands and thousands of people in this country.

            Yes, in general, no one ever asks you.
            Is this the only place where you disagree with the official position of the Russian Federation or is there still?
            How about sanctions against the DPRK? wink
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            Until now, we are unraveling what the countries that are members of the UN Security Council have done there ... shame on this organization ... instead of peace, war is their principle.

            Who is disentangling?
            Are you? Hosting Libyan refugees? Or Syrian? Or at worst - from the Donbass? Donbass has nothing to do with it, so the question is about --- we disentangle laughing
  3. cannabis
    cannabis 11 January 2018 10: 02 New
    0
    Against - against ...
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 11 January 2018 10: 09 New
      +1
      cannabis today, 10:02
      Against - against ...

      ... all nasty - against ... bully
      1. cannabis
        cannabis 11 January 2018 10: 15 New
        +1
        No, well, there is a circus everywhere. In the photo, the round table is like a barrier in the circus. And clowns. The headline is also a circus, because it could have been written "We spoke in favor of maintaining sanctions against Pyongyang."
  4. Strips
    Strips 11 January 2018 10: 24 New
    +1
    Why are the voices of Russia and China not heard in the UN Security Council for easing sanctions?
    Russia and China, who recently voted to strengthen sanctions with the United States ?.
  5. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 11 January 2018 10: 30 New
    +3
    The DPRK wanted to sneeze at the loud but essentially empty statements of the Naglo-Saxons. Korea now has a vigorous loaf and more than one, as the Britons say "come and get us".
  6. Antianglosax
    Antianglosax 11 January 2018 10: 44 New
    +1
    What do these disgusting little gay European mongrels have to do with North Korea? Where are they, and where is Korea! What are the nafik threats? What illegal activities are they bleating about? Is there absolutely no one in the UN to shut up the deceitful maw of these degenerates? Rather, the Arabs with the blacks would have cut this Geyrop biomass ... tired of waiting
  7. rocket757
    rocket757 11 January 2018 10: 58 New
    +3
    In short, stir up the water, as usual.
    Koreans themselves will be able to figure out how they can build a life without war!
    Keep any trash away from there, we can and peace will come.
  8. nikolaev
    nikolaev 11 January 2018 11: 47 New
    +1
    why does the UN not raise the issue of illegal possession of nuclear weapons by Israel, an aggressive fascist state? While the peaceful DPRK is constantly being attacked and sanctioned by the so-called "world community"?
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 11 January 2018 11: 56 New
      +3
      Shah, are you anti-Semitic? Can you even deny the Holocaust ???
  9. Litvinov
    Litvinov 11 January 2018 14: 57 New
    0
    "We want these provocations and the buildup of (missile and nuclear) programs to stop, and the full denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula to be achieved."

    A dog barks - the wind wears ... Northern ones don’t, and they won’t give up their sovereignty. Unlike Europe, they can survive and develop in the most adverse conditions.
    --------
    Kim Jong-un - the mind, honor and conscience of our era!
  10. Slovak
    Slovak 11 January 2018 16: 32 New
    0
    The UN Security Council, under the leadership of the United States, is doing everything to ensure that the DPRK remains the "enemy of humanity"