State Department: US will not go for the diplomatic recognition of the part of Syria, controlled by the militants

27
The US authorities are not going to go for diplomatic recognition of that part of Syria, which is located east of the Euphrates River and is controlled by opposition forces, reports TASS Statement by US Assistant Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Stephen Goldstin.

State Department: US will not go for the diplomatic recognition of the part of Syria, controlled by the militants


The diplomat was asked to comment on publications in the Middle Eastern press, which say that Washington is taking steps towards diplomatic recognition of the territory of Syria east of the Euphrates, which is under the control of the opposition forces of Democratic Syria (SDF).

(Washington’s position is) that we support the territorial integrity of Syria, as well as united democratic Syria, which protects the rights of all groups (people),
said goldstein.

He assured that the United States advocates that the future of Syria will be determined by its citizens.

It is important that the future of Syria is decided by the Syrians in accordance with the political transition (to the new government in Damascus) and the electoral process, enshrined in UN Security Council Resolution 2254,
stressed the diplomat.

In this regard, he was again asked whether "the United States plans to go for diplomatic recognition of any part of Syria."

We would urge all the Syrian parties to work together in a manner consistent with the task of moving the UN-led political process forward.
answered goldstin.

About the fact that the United States allegedly intend to take steps in the near future, aimed at diplomatic recognition of the region that is in the hands of the VTS, wrote inter-Arab newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat on January 7. The publication referred to the statements of some high-ranking Western representative. According to him, this refers to the region east of the Euphrates River, whose area is about 24 thousand square meters. km The interlocutor of the newspaper argued that the US administration is currently developing a new strategy for Syria, including these plans.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    10 January 2018 15: 24
    We got it already with my daisy: we recognize, we don’t recognize.
    1. +4
      10 January 2018 15: 31
      the Arabs wrote in a newspaper that they admit. America replied no.

      Of course, it’s not a fact that words coincide with deeds - but they only answered the questions of journalists. And there is no july in this thread yet.
      1. +2
        10 January 2018 16: 08
        To trust the State Department Americans in the current situation is simply not to respect yourself!
    2. +1
      10 January 2018 15: 32
      it’s time to introduce the army into the states themselves for financing and supporting terrorism ...
    3. +7
      10 January 2018 15: 53
      (Washington’s position is) that we support the territorial integrity of Syria, as well as united democratic Syria, which protects the rights of all groups (people),

      If they say so, then again some kind of muck is conceived. Yes
    4. +2
      10 January 2018 16: 24
      What is the doggie thing for Americans to climb into the recognition or non-recognition of part of state territories in other states. belay
  2. +2
    10 January 2018 15: 24
    They should not recognize anyone or anything, they will also teach and finance their fighters.
  3. +4
    10 January 2018 15: 26
    At some point, the militants turn into rebels .... take for example the Albanians in Kosovo.
    1. 0
      10 January 2018 16: 31
      This is already a system ... As a pro-American opposition ... There is nowhere worse ... What are the same Kosovars ... What are the Basmachi in Syria ... The trend however ...
  4. +1
    10 January 2018 15: 27
    Glimpses of the mind in the State Department? I can’t believe something, probably some kind of muck started ...
    1. +3
      10 January 2018 15: 32
      such declarations of recognition can only be made when a line of conduct has been worked out in the regional committee and possible answers to the actions of dissent are considered
      If there is no such statement so far, then this is not the time. But this does not mean that such options are not being worked out.
  5. 0
    10 January 2018 15: 28
    Somewhat unexpectedly.
  6. +2
    10 January 2018 15: 41
    The dog barked, and the echo still carries. Like everything in our world.
  7. +2
    10 January 2018 15: 53
    The article shows that US expulsion from Syria is in question. In light of this, I would like to ask: "What prevents to remove the abscess?" If there is no desire, then rewriting from day to day the "news" about how it smells vilely is not necessary. If there is no opportunity - at least do not be humbled, do not ask ...
    1. 0
      10 January 2018 16: 23
      Quote: Esoteric
      In light of this, I would like to ask: "What prevents to remove the abscess?"

      The abscess strength is orders of magnitude greater than the strength of the healer. This is what bothers. And do not recall international law. The right of power is a priority.
  8. +4
    10 January 2018 16: 06
    Lied at all, they themselves will not understand where the truth is, where the lie ...
  9. +1
    10 January 2018 16: 41
    According to him, this refers to the region east of the Euphrates River, whose area is about 24 thousand square meters. km The interlocutor of the newspaper claimed that the US administration is currently developing a new strategy for Syria, including these plans.
    ------------------------------------
    Why do they need these bits of Syrian territory, when you can still throw options for the removal of the "bloody Assad"? They need all of Syria, and preferably without the Russian Hmeimim and Tartus.
  10. 0
    10 January 2018 16: 42
    If you admit, then you have to answer for them ...
    What for ...
  11. +4
    10 January 2018 17: 07
    It is important that the future of Syria be decided by the Syrians, the diplomat emphasized.

    US will not go on diplomatic recognition of part of Syria


    Bullshit and shoe change in a jump. Recently, US diplomats remind me of stupid gopniks in the area. The same level of intelligence.
  12. 0
    10 January 2018 17: 15
    We would urge all Syrian parties to work together in a manner that is consistent with the task of advancing the UN-led political process

    Can? To leave!
    What if? This one, don’t!
    Then? It’s for sure - to promote the interests of the United States through the UN led by it!
  13. 0
    10 January 2018 17: 20
    moving forward the UN-led political process,
    What are these UN-led processes going on? UN like. a certain instrument of the states, generally outlived itself. An extra mention of the UN suggests that the Americans are trying to make the whole world for themselves.
  14. +3
    10 January 2018 17: 28
    As the Indians on the American continent said, "Do not believe the pale-faced, they are coyotes .."
    Russia believed them in the 90s, everyone remembers what started ..
  15. 0
    10 January 2018 17: 38
    They do not have faith, if they say they will not, read- discuss this opportunity! So not a fact! They do such stuffing to look at the reaction ...
  16. +6
    10 January 2018 19: 28
    shed tears of tenderness crying "we support the territorial integrity of Syria" ....
    and then "as well as a single democratic Syria" ..... how many Syria do they support there ??
    and where in the UN Security Council resolution 2254 it is written that mattresses can be built for bearded nurseries near their bases? request
  17. 0
    10 January 2018 20: 39
    Quote: Tatiana
    To trust the State Department Americans in the current situation is simply not to respect yourself!

    I don’t believe them either, I believe only my native MO and Shoigu lol
  18. 0
    10 January 2018 21: 36
    If they go to the political recognition of the "opposition", then our green light is on the Political recognition of the LPR and DPR. And America will have nothing to blather, from the word at all.
  19. +4
    11 January 2018 02: 17
    Striped did not say a clear NO. And this only means that all their statements are nothing more than an artistic whistle. They will do what is beneficial to them. At this point in time, it is beneficial for them to speak like this. And nothing else follows from these speeches.