Military Review

The world's largest submarine missile carrier "Dmitry Donskoy" will remain in the Navy

69
Strategic heavy nuclear submarine of project 941UM "Shark" "Dmitry Donskoy" North fleetused to test the Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), it will remain in the combat strength of the navy, said Navy Commander-in-Chief Admiral Vladimir Korolev.


The world's largest submarine missile carrier "Dmitry Donskoy" will remain in the Navy


Dmitry Donskoy "will be part of the Navy (Navy)
- said the commander-in-chief in an interview with the Zavod magazine of the Sevmash enterprise.

In 2017, Dmitry Donskoy made a unique inter-fleet transfer to the Baltic, where he took part in the Main Naval Parade in Kronstadt, after which he returned to the place of permanent stationing.

According to open sources, the displacement of the world's largest nuclear submarine is almost 50 thousand tons. Initially, the missile carrier was armed with the 20 ICBM of the D-19 complex, then it was reequipped for testing the Bulava ICBM.

Six submarines of the 941 project were built on Sevmash. In the combat structure of the Navy, only Dmitry Donskoy remains at present. Three hulls were disposed of (with the assistance of the United States), two boats are on the list, reports Interfax-AVN.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. skylare
    skylare 10 January 2018 14: 34
    17
    One of the fragments of former greatness.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 10 January 2018 14: 37
      +3
      More is not better.
      1. lance
        lance 10 January 2018 14: 45
        14
        in this case, it means that its mines can still accept blue or cruise missiles, if memory serves in the amount of 315 pieces.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 10 January 2018 14: 51
          +5
          And for what? It is better to have 10 boats in 30 calibres than one on 300.
          1. the most important
            the most important 10 January 2018 15: 25
            16
            Quote: Muvka
            And for what? It is better to have 10 boats in 30 calibres than one on 300.

            And for me, one tank is better than ten slingshots!
          2. Vlad.by
            Vlad.by 10 January 2018 18: 29
            0
            Well, as I imagine a massive attack with a hundred Caliber from one point ...
            No anti-aircraft defenses
          3. Don
            Don 10 January 2018 22: 46
            0
            Quote: Muvka
            And for what? It is better to have 10 boats in 30 calibres than one on 300.

            Movka, I don’t recognize you in makeup, what happened to you? belay Did the goddess of common sense visit you by chance?
          4. Grits
            Grits 11 January 2018 05: 37
            +2
            And for what? It is better to have 10 boats in 30 calibres than one on 300.
            It’s better during a global war - so there’s a better chance of survival. But if in a peace period (or rather, during the conduct of regional wars) it is much more pleasant to have one carrier of cruise missiles. Imagine that instead of our RTOs and other ships, on which 8 “Caliber” to the Syrian coast would go “Dmitry Donskoy”, which instead of ballistic missile shafts would have launchers for a hundred “Caliber”. Feel the difference?
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 10 January 2018 15: 37
          +4
          Quote: Lance
          in this case, it means that its mines can still accept blue or cruise missiles, if memory serves in the amount of 315 pieces.

          But when he leaves the Gadzhievo, the Yankees at his home hear him.
          1. Per se.
            Per se. 10 January 2018 16: 24
            16
            Quote: Piramidon
            yankesy at home hear it
            How much crap can this retell, in this case, Americans should hear "at home" and all the boats of the previous series, as the "Shark" is a less noisy boat, which has been used a lot of advanced technology, including noise reduction. In general, the project was intended directly for the Arctic, where the natural crash of ice masks the noise of the boat. If the success of the test and "ice" rockets capable of breaking through the ice at start, the boat would be able to strike completely from the ice, although, thanks to its mass and enhanced wheelhouse, the Shark would break through almost any ice in the Arctic.
          2. NEXUS
            NEXUS 10 January 2018 16: 25
            13
            Quote: Piramidon
            But when he leaves the Gadzhievo, the Yankees at his home hear him.

            Yeah ... but when he leaves under the ice, why are there the mattresses hear and see, do not tell?
          3. the most important
            the most important 10 January 2018 18: 22
            +6
            Quote: Piramidon
            But when he leaves the Gadzhievo, the Yankees at his home hear him.

            And they report to you ?? lol
            1. Nikolai Grek
              Nikolai Grek 10 January 2018 21: 06
              +5
              Quote: the most important
              Quote: Piramidon
              But when he leaves the Gadzhievo, the Yankees at his home hear him.

              And they report to you ?? lol

              hears by smell !!! wink laughing laughing laughing
          4. Nikolai Grek
            Nikolai Grek 10 January 2018 21: 05
            +3
            Quote: Piramidon
            the Yankees hear at home.

            they don’t hear, but they put it in the pants !!! wink yes laughing laughing laughing
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 10 January 2018 21: 34
              +6
              Quote: Nikolai Grek
              Quote: Piramidon
              the Yankees hear at home.

              they don’t hear, but they put it in the pants !!! wink yes laughing laughing laughing

              Maybe enough about pants, diapers, etc. excreta. This is no longer relevant. The topic of diapers is hackneyed on the Internet right up to the asphalt. Even the most stupid bloggers have already abandoned it.
              1. Nikolai Grek
                Nikolai Grek 11 January 2018 00: 19
                +5
                Quote: Piramidon
                the Yankees hear at home.

                what what what it seems to you there indicated above that your "Yankees at home hear him." also already a hackneyed topic that did not stop you from dragging it here !!! request laughing laughing laughing
            2. Don
              Don 10 January 2018 22: 57
              +1
              Quote: Nikolai Grek
              Quote: Piramidon
              the Yankees hear at home.

              they don’t hear, but they put it in the pants !!! wink yes laughing laughing laughing

              I'm starting to worry about your mental and physical health. You have some sort of persecution mania. Partly I understand you: age, propaganda, life, not the best social conditions, etc. doing their job, but ... you would have to drive a car in Europe, live there for a month or two, look and change your pink glasses to colorless.
              1. Nikolai Grek
                Nikolai Grek 11 January 2018 00: 21
                +5
                Quote: Donskoy
                Quote: Nikolai Grek
                Quote: Piramidon
                the Yankees hear at home.

                they don’t hear, but they put it in the pants !!! wink yes laughing laughing laughing

                I'm starting to worry about your mental and physical health. You have some sort of persecution mania. Partly I understand you: age, propaganda, life, not the best social conditions, etc. doing their job, but ... you would have to drive a car in Europe, live there for a month or two, look and change your pink glasses to colorless.

                what what what
                I’m starting to worry about your mental and physical health. You have a glimpse of megalomania right there - you know everything about everyone on the planet, you are giving directions to everyone !!! wassat wassat lol lol lol
          5. Grits
            Grits 11 January 2018 05: 46
            +3
            But when he leaves the Gadzhievo, the Yankees at his home hear him.
            Yes, and let them hear. I repeat that outside the global nuclear war, he can even go full steam ahead to the site of another regional conflict without diving. Who will stop him? Let them not only hear, but also see. And they know that this colossus is going to water in the toilet of the next women. Like a large platform for launching cruise missiles. By the way, you can not swim to the place of battles somewhere around 2500 kilometers.
          6. VALERIK_097
            VALERIK_097 11 January 2018 10: 24
            0
            Dear, you are not accidentally sick. Like Gadzhievo, a ship practically does not leave the White Sea.
            On Wikipedia, look where ships of pr.941 were based.
          7. ihnovich990
            ihnovich990 13 January 2018 22: 43
            0
            And the code is “Sharks” in Gadzhievo based?
      2. Sharky
        Sharky 10 January 2018 14: 52
        +1
        More is not better.

        More means more Bulava ICBMs can be downloaded (can you tell me how many Don mines are in operation, and how many are Boreya?) good
      3. leshiy076
        leshiy076 10 January 2018 15: 02
        11
        So big it was made on purpose. The boat can break through the Arctic ice almost anywhere and withstand up to 6 direct torpedo hits, which, in turn, guaranteed a complete ammunition fire even if the boat was constantly accompanied by underwater hunters.
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 10 January 2018 15: 10
          +6
          Quote: leshiy076
          So big it was made on purpose. The boat can break through the Arctic ice almost anywhere and withstand up to 6 direct torpedo hits

          This is the property of any SSBNs built in the USSR and under construction in Russia. Moreover .. there are no direct hits from torpedoes, they are detonated at a distance from the hull.
          Two hulls were used for only one reason .. Missiles .. they were too big for a single-hull boat .. and that's it ..
          1. vvvjak
            vvvjak 10 January 2018 16: 53
            +4
            "Shark" consists of 5 buildings
          2. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 10 January 2018 17: 23
            12
            Here is her outline. Indeed, something fantastic in complexity.
            1. Grits
              Grits 11 January 2018 06: 24
              +1
              I was on the Shark once. When they drove me through it, I got lost
        2. NEXUS
          NEXUS 10 January 2018 16: 27
          +4
          Quote: leshiy076
          and withstand up to 6 direct hits of torpedoes, which, in turn, guaranteed a full ammunition firing

          Therefore, it was created and double-hull and everything is duplicated on it.
    2. vlad66
      vlad66 10 January 2018 14: 42
      18
      King boat hi
      Watch a short video
  2. ustinov.yuri
    ustinov.yuri 10 January 2018 14: 36
    14
    "With the assistance of the United States." E in R. (inexpressible censorship pun)
  3. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 10 January 2018 14: 44
    +9
    Such a huge and already unique platform can be converted for any purpose, the resource is not spent = therefore they leave it - I think pretty soon we will recognize this ship in a new hypostasis
  4. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 10 January 2018 14: 44
    +9
    Epic submarine cruiser. When I read "Sharks of Steel" and "Shoot!", I fell under the table with laughter))

    If anyone missed these books, it is strongly recommended that you read them - you will not regret it. smile
    1. Severomor
      Severomor 10 January 2018 17: 48
      +2
      Authors
      Shoot - Alexander Pokrovsky (based on the film - 72 meters (5 points) and the series Goryunov 3-)
      Steel Sharks - Ovechkin Eduard
      1. Sands Careers General
        Sands Careers General 10 January 2018 17: 52
        +5
        That's right.
        The film is normal, the series did not watch, and even once. Our books are everything.
  5. Magic archer
    Magic archer 10 January 2018 14: 48
    +1
    Is it really impossible to upgrade such a unique boat for something?! Well, it’s not to be decided, to the delight of our overseas “friends” !!! With such dimensions, almost ANY ICBM can be placed there! And if you remake the same Caliber, then you can all of Europe keep sight. And do not care about the pro.
    1. vvvjak
      vvvjak 10 January 2018 16: 45
      +4
      Modernization of one "Shark" is more expensive than the construction of 3 new "Boreev"
    2. faiver
      faiver 10 January 2018 17: 13
      0
      duck the whole of Europe and so on sight ...
  6. kolkulon
    kolkulon 10 January 2018 14: 49
    0
    In Babylon A.D. wasn’t she carrying the refugees by chance?
  7. Herculesic
    Herculesic 10 January 2018 14: 50
    +1
    In vain, we then launched two such boats on needles! To remake the same Caliber carriers, it’ll come out better than the cruiser! good
    1. the most important
      the most important 10 January 2018 15: 32
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      In vain, we then launched two such boats on needles! To remake the same Caliber carriers, it’ll come out better than the cruiser!

      It is necessary to rationally approach the people's good ... ditching is certainly easier than building. It is possible that at some stage of development, the fleet will become more and more submarine. And it seems rational to me when cruisers, destroyers and frigates secretly move underwater ..
    2. abc_alex
      abc_alex 10 January 2018 20: 43
      +1
      When they were put on the needles of the "Caliber" was not there. And the R-39 missiles had the first stage, manufactured in Ukraine. No other ICBMs of such dimensions required. And the concept of a massive non-nuclear strike by cruise missiles at that time was not relevant. So the decision was justified right away. No one expected the Cold War 2 to loom on the horizon.
  8. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 10 January 2018 14: 58
    +1
    I wonder what it means - two boats remain in reserve ..... in what condition are they ???
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 10 January 2018 15: 12
      0
      The reactors are muffled, the power is from the shore, part of the equipment is dismantled .. They will be cut .. and rightly so.
      1. Evgeniy667b
        Evgeniy667b 10 January 2018 16: 16
        +6
        What is the correctness? The new won over how long it takes to build, especially ICAPL Presenting the mind a lot is not necessary, but when it is impatient and there will be nothing to cover. And then on every 20 mines! Of course, some admirals will get a scrap of metal, as has happened more than once, and if you also have this, then it’s right from your point of view!
        1. thinker
          thinker 10 January 2018 16: 27
          +2
          Today they wrote about a novelty - a bottom-based rocket
          The task of secrecy of being on combat duty of the Skif rocket is quite simple. The carrier boat comes under water to a given point and discards the container. No installation work is required as the container simply lays on the bottom. Upon receipt of a start command due to partial purging, the container acquires the quality of a tumbler toy, that is, it occupies an upright position. After that, the purge continues, and the container begins to pop up. It is believed that a rocket is ejected from a container using a solid-fuel accelerator at a depth of 50 meters. That is, how this happens on submarines.

          https://cont.ws/@sam8807/819121
          1. Starover_Z
            Starover_Z 11 January 2018 00: 40
            +1
            Quote: thinker
            Upon receipt of a start command

            I personally became interested, but how will the “Skiff” receive a “Start” signal while lying at the bottom?
            How many have read here, and even before, communication with underwater objects is difficult ....
            1. thinker
              thinker 11 January 2018 06: 48
              0
              You are right, the connection under water is still a problem hi
              Mystic low pass. How to contact a submarine?

              https://topwar.ru/31764-kak-svyazatsya-s-podvodno
              y-lodkoy.html
      2. faiver
        faiver 10 January 2018 17: 14
        0
        why right? why so annoyed?
  9. sergo1914
    sergo1914 10 January 2018 15: 00
    +1
    Epic thing. Standing on the beach of Severodvinsk, and appears on the horizon ... THIS ...
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 10 January 2018 15: 11
      +2
      Quote: sergo1914
      Standing on the beach of Severodvinsk

      Eeee ... Severodvinsk. Of course, but they don’t say that .. The beach there is Yagrinsky ..
      1. sergo1914
        sergo1914 10 January 2018 17: 33
        0
        Quote: dvina71
        Quote: sergo1914
        Standing on the beach of Severodvinsk

        Eeee ... Severodvinsk. Of course, but they don’t say that .. The beach there is Yagrinsky ..


        So I have not been with you for a long time (since 1986). And the younger brother is there. Dad is retired. He let her down.
      2. Methane
        Methane 11 January 2018 00: 10
        0
        I was exactly driven from this beach, a bastard, a zagreb. I also managed to plunge into the sea well lol
        And I saw the boat in its entirety in the dry dock.
      3. Grits
        Grits 11 January 2018 07: 07
        0
        Eeee ... Severodvinsk. Of course, but they don’t say that .. The beach there is Yagrinsky ..
        And they say - "Better is the Northern Gagra than the South Yagra"
  10. LPD17
    LPD17 10 January 2018 16: 55
    +2
    and at what Supreme, they were brought out? what years ???
  11. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 10 January 2018 17: 07
    +1
    At least one great news from MO! I would like to know the name of this daredevil - clever. whose brains still work under a cap! And this is clearly not Shoigu with Gerasimov and Rogozin?
  12. Nemesis
    Nemesis 10 January 2018 18: 13
    0
    What is the use of this submarine if it does not have the main ammunition, at least in the form of the same Bulava or Liner missiles ?! A large, almost unarmed, trough ...
    1. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 13 January 2018 07: 08
      0
      They had ammunition, but during the Medvedev presidency they tried to get rid of it. The question is, why? But not to strengthen Russia's defense capability, that's for sure!
      1. Nemesis
        Nemesis 14 January 2018 09: 06
        0
        Each rocket has an expiration date and it is clear why the old missiles were removed from service. Some of the missile nuclear submarines, carriers of the Sinev missiles, were converted to new Liner missiles, which are made on the basis of Sineva, but differ from Sineva. Another thing is not clear - Why are the unarmed submarines kept in the fleet, especially in our uneasy time, when it can be converted to Sineva or Mace and used for its intended purpose, because its resource has not yet been exhausted ...?!
  13. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 10 January 2018 19: 21
    +4
    Three enclosures disposed of (with US assistance)

    For this alone, you can safely send a tagged one on the rack ....
    1. 16112014nk
      16112014nk 10 January 2018 21: 11
      +7
      TK 202 - cut in 2005
      TK 12 - cut in 2007
      TC 13 was cut in 2008
      As if here, and not “tagged,” but some other. But there were proposals to remake them for tankers for the Northern Sea Route.
      And so they destroy themselves with the money of "partners".
      1. CAT BAIYUN
        CAT BAIYUN 11 January 2018 00: 13
        +5
        Partly you are right, and partly I agree with you, but the beginning of all this lawlessness was laid precisely when marked. Everything else is a consequence ... I have the feeling that if BB didn’t appear in power, they would have finished everything else ...
        1. 16112014nk
          16112014nk 11 January 2018 12: 16
          +1
          Quote: KOT BYUN
          if BB didn’t appear in power, they’d already finish the rest ...

          I agree. The truth is somewhere near.
  14. Tests
    Tests 10 January 2018 19: 34
    +4
    Nemesis, have you been to the Shark? Or just seen on TV?
    "Dmitry Donskoy" from the pier in Severodvinsk "Mace" to Washington, if necessary, reach. And taking into account the number of warheads, their power, their maneuverability and the short time spent by the missile in the area of ​​the trajectory where, purely theoretically, the missile defense system can resist it, it’s in vain that you called the glorious order of Sevmash the trough.
    Yes, and please do not forget that there are torpedo boats in the boats. Thanks to them, various interesting things fly out, relatively quietly, and go out, and a little later, a few dozen nautical miles from the boat, something switches to the chaotic molecular level at the partners.
  15. vadivm59
    vadivm59 10 January 2018 19: 50
    0
    one word "water carrier".
  16. Old26
    Old26 10 January 2018 21: 41
    0
    Quote: Lance
    in this case, it means that its mines can still accept blue or cruise missiles, if memory serves in the amount of 315 pieces.

    And where did you count their number? In 20 mines? Under the "Blue" mine will have to rebuild, as rebuilt under the "Mace"

    Quote: Sharky
    More is not better.

    More means more Bulava ICBMs can be downloaded (can you tell me how many Don mines are in operation, and how many are Boreya?) good

    Already 4 more. Prada will need to put the boat on the alteration of mines
  17. ydjin
    ydjin 11 January 2018 14: 16
    +1
    , these three corps should be stuffed with maces and calibers, any barmalei would simply be relegated to the role of small gopniks.
  18. mosenergo
    mosenergo 11 January 2018 20: 54
    0
    There is a good book about this submarine called Typhoon Robin White. Read not regret it.
  19. Eflintuk
    Eflintuk 11 January 2018 21: 00
    +1
    Stop raving already. Sineva, liner, 315 unknown cruise missiles, an underwater tanker ... these boats were built using the block method - they are unrepairable. The place of basing is the pier of Sevmash. While Sevmash inserted these 6 shafts under the mace and made the mace itself - the full-time carrier was ready, so it turns out Sevmash invented his own work. Now it will contain this scrap metal with the hope of paying for parking until the end of the centuries. And the admirals (of which there are more than ships) also need to justify their existence - headquarters, divisions, brigades, and the entire fleet is at the walls. We build a mosquito fleet, and we laugh at the Ukrainians at the same time.
  20. SpN V
    SpN V 13 January 2018 06: 03
    0
    Mace M is heavier than the previous Mace; accordingly, all three boats in the future may still be upgraded to heavy solid fuel Mace M.