Military Review

The Club of the Homeless War

35



The capitalist elite, extending its system to the whole world, has an advantage in the means of both attack and defense against it, since its globally expansive nature enables it to maintain its dominant status (“Without the right to coexist”). And any nationally-oriented government in Russia will need to solve the task of countering this expansion in the conditions of inevitable confrontation with the West.

There is no doubt that defense alone is not enough; attack means are also required to defeat the West and its core. The question of what should be weapon and the methods of war are very extensive, so we will consider only one of the possibilities.

The main thing is the understanding of the need to destroy the transatlantic link America - Europe. A significant part of the latter is de facto under the occupation of the United States and their TNCs. Militarily, this is a network of American bases throughout the Old World, in economic terms, the lion’s share of the largest European companies’s shares belong to American “elder brothers”, in geo-cultural one, to impose the ideology of ultra-liberalism and its pseudo-values ​​... And political influence is indisputable. It is logical to strike at once in several directions, one of which would be the weakening of Washington's vassals in Europe. The means to achieve the goal is to change its ethnic composition, which in turn is a manifestation of the reverse side of globalization and parallel destabilization of the Middle East and the Maghreb.

We are talking about migration, which has become almost a key problem for Europe. In 2015, there was a sharp influx of refugees from conflict zones, the analysis of this phenomenon indicates its projectivity, but not the spontaneity. In fact, we are talking about social engineering of the new level, which used one part of the global capitalist elite against the other, turning the enemy's weapon against him. The forces that opposed the creation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TATIP) and sought to secede the UK from the EU took place.

Dictate

It should be noted that the crisis in the EU was not connected with the number of migrants as such, but with the intensity of their flow, when the relevant services simply could not cope with human pressure. If this factor is activated by the Western system for internal fights, it would be the height of short-sightedness not to try to use it already in the interests of Russia. If you influence the intensity of resettlement in key EU countries, you can simulate such an ethno-religious composition, which will lead to irreversible destructive consequences for European societies. The term “migration weapon” already exists, which means a mass exodus of refugees from a region where artificially created conditions that threaten the life of the local population. The human flow is controlled in a controlled manner to specific countries in order to exert on their governments and societies political, socio-cultural, economic and psychological impact. As a result, we obtain a weapon of tremendous destructive power, and a very effective one. In 2015 – 2016, only Germany allocated 20 billion euros for migrants. These costs are borne by ordinary German taxpayers and will not be compensated in the future.

The idea that migrants become cheap labor is erroneous, so that the costs of them will be covered with salary savings for the local population, whose labor costs significantly more. Not for work for pennies, they rush to the EU countries, but for the sake of social benefits and other advantages. And the goal is achieved at the cost of a significant infringement of the rights of the local population, turning into second-rate people. This process is partly a consequence of rampant liberalism, which was imposed on countries by supranational elites for the demolition of their sovereignty, due to traditional values, culture and way of life. For loosening scrap, alien pseudo-values ​​such as same-sex marriages, multiculturalism, total pseudo-freedom from any moral norms were introduced.

In neoliberalism, everything that supposedly limits a person is subject to obstruction and eradication, including sovereignty, with the help of which the apologists of globalization destroy borders. Naturally, this has nothing to do with freedom, if only because globalization is carried out in the interests of the elites who lead the process. It should be noted that the overwhelming majority of social destruction technologies have a common feature: the imposition of the opinion of an aggressive minority on the majority. In this sense, Western neoliberal globalism is pure totalitarianism. The same is with migrants - influence on countries is carried out through the introduction of isolated, incapable of socio-cultural diffusion of ethno-religious elements. At the same time, the local elite and the ordinary population are unable to resist strangers, since they are more united, younger, more aggressive, confident in their cultural andhistorical right. Who do migrants see when they arrive in Europe? Aging, degrading average burghers, not ready to protect themselves and their families, trapped in globalization, joyfully extending their rights to outsiders, without equalizing those in responsibilities. As a result, migrants, even being in the minority, dictate their will to a degrading European majority.

Arafat's Atomic Bomb

How to contribute to an even greater influx of migrants to the EU countries in order to weaken it? For this, a nationally-oriented government can, under any plausible excuse, for example, fighting terrorism, use the opportunities that have opened up in Africa and through dismantled Libya to intensify the flow of migrants to EU countries, thereby provoking social conflicts and ethnoreligious hostility, economic decline, deterioration of the crime situation there . At the same time, it is possible to inflict demographic damage to the indigenous population of Europe and provoke a crisis within the white majority parties, unable to curb the situation, inspire conflict between the old and new political forces representing the interests of an increasing number of migrants. There is no doubt that as soon as the latter make up about a quarter of the population of the EU countries, an inevitable imbalance will arise in society. At one time, Yasser Arafat loved to say: "Our atomic bomb is the womb of an Arab woman." If this weapon is used in the interests of Russia, it is possible to destroy Europe once and for all, which means weakening the Anglo-American core of the capitalist system and the very transatlantic link on which it relies to a significant degree.

This is not the only way to crush the collective West, but extremely attractive from the point of view of the final result. It is noteworthy that in this situation any of the ways of Russia is beneficial. To avoid a final historical catastrophe, Europe will need to radically change the vector of development, but this will have to abandon globalization, create a neo-fascist regime, regain sovereignty, which automatically means a split. Such an outcome is unlikely, but if it does, the West will be disintegrated and, therefore, weakened. If the degradation of Europe and the change in its ethno-religious composition continue, it is in our interest to accelerate this process so that it shrinks from decades to years.
Author:
Originator:
https://vpk-news.ru/articles/40679
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. parusnik
    parusnik 10 January 2018 08: 15
    +8
    If the degradation of Europe and a change in its ethno-religious composition continue, it is in our interests to accelerate this process so that it shrinks from decades to years.
    ... If in Europe the ethno-religious composition changes, what are the advantages for Russia ..?
    1. novel66
      novel66 10 January 2018 09: 12
      +9
      offhand - no. get the Islamists at hand - what the hell!
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 10 January 2018 13: 34
        +8
        In my opinion, the author provocatively lures Russia into an adventurous political trap and does not think through to the end the negative consequences of his proposal for Russia itself in the future.
        1. Buffet
          Buffet 10 January 2018 13: 49
          10
          Provided that in Russia the same problem. There are almost 30% in pre-trial detention centers who are "come in large numbers", they do not talk about rape on TV at all.
      2. Mairos
        Mairos 10 January 2018 17: 10
        +1
        I agree! Better Europeans wake up from liberalism and kick the "refugees" so that they run back
      3. albert
        albert 10 January 2018 22: 37
        +5
        We would manage with our migrants from Central Asia. The author forgets that any two-edged sword.
      4. Alber
        Alber 13 January 2018 13: 38
        0
        Quote: novel xnumx
        offhand - no. get the Islamists at hand - what the hell!

        Yes, we have been teeming with them for a long time
    2. Antianglosax
      Antianglosax 10 January 2018 10: 41
      +5
      Quote: parusnik
      If the degradation of Europe and a change in its ethno-religious composition continue, it is in our interests to accelerate this process so that it shrinks from decades to years.
      ... If in Europe the ethno-religious composition changes, what are the advantages for Russia ..?

      The guarantee that for many, many years of geyropa no one will look at Russia as an object for plunder. Not until then. White gayropecy will still ask for help and kiss the feet of the Russian people (here they will need to be politely sent). A thousand rams are much easier to handle than a dozen wolves. Why are Americans dropping the whole world? - In order to look like "d'Artagnans." Against the background of omitted geyropa, we will look the same and breaks to us will be geyropskie white geeks, saving their skins, like maniacs. smile And why should the Islamists die in Russia when it is possible for a long time, with impunity and without a hack to rob the meek and dumb gayropets who were their former colonialists?
      And, of course, I agree with the author - the height of madness would not be to seize the opportunity and not help in any way send several million blacks and Arabs to the geyropa.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. volodimer
        volodimer 10 January 2018 17: 13
        +3
        "The guarantee that for many, many years from the geyropa no one will look at Russia as an object for plunder ..."
        I'm afraid you are too optimistic. Do you think that for a long time Europe will be enough for the refugees to get enough? In addition, do we have so few problems from the relatively friendly neighboring Muslim states? And then there's Muslim Europe, obviously not secular? You can still talk with today's Europe, it is afraid of us, and a Europe consisting of continuous “molebacks” will become our great headache to the joy of the same USA.
        Europe in its current form, of course kirdyk, but we will not be better off from this.
      3. dSK
        dSK 11 January 2018 00: 33
        0
        Quote: Antianglosaks
        riding madness would be
        to do such things.
        Matthew the holy gospel - 7:12 "So in everything you want people to do with you, so do you with them, for this is the law and the prophets."
        1. dSK
          dSK 11 January 2018 00: 46
          0
          Vladimir Vladimirovich credited the Russian Aerospace Forces that it reduced the flow of refugees to Europe, stopping the civil war in Syria.
          1. dSK
            dSK 11 January 2018 00: 53
            +1
            Quote: Strigunov
            Europe will need to radically change the vector of development, create a neo-fascist regime,
            and find Hitler. The "blue dream" of the state puppeteers.
    3. Northern warrior
      Northern warrior 11 January 2018 03: 04
      +1
      The threat of war with a high-tech adversary will disappear, because barmalei on jihad mobiles are a much easier target for turntables and attack aircraft than the Bundeswehr tanks.
      1. Galleon
        Galleon 12 January 2018 17: 49
        0
        American instructors will definitely come to them, as before, at any desired point. Everything is better than fighting them.
  2. solzh
    solzh 10 January 2018 08: 36
    +2
    The degradation of Europe can no longer be stopped.
  3. Vard
    Vard 10 January 2018 08: 58
    +1
    Alas ... It looks like in ten years ... fifteen, a country like Israel will become an Arab in a democratic way ... Already now, a third of the population there are not Jews ...
    1. brigadir
      brigadir 10 January 2018 12: 22
      +4
      The ratio of non-Jewish Jews in Israel (within the green line) is quite stable and only fluctuates from year to year - 25% of non-Jews. BUT !: Fertility in different sectors of Israeli society is changing. Now there are 3-4 children per Jewish woman and 4-5 Muslim women (Arabs are Christian sociologically characterized as Jews. They even have lower birth rates). The gap is narrowing. There are now an average of 3 children in a Jewish non-religious family (in a religious family - how much God will give, but they do not count relatively - they do not serve in the army, they do not work - but they participate in democratic elections, though they vote for their own) and the trend is 4 children. The Arabs, on the contrary, have a tendency to lower fertility and to abandon polygamy.
      So, demographically, we Jews in Israel are not particularly in danger. And Arabs in Israel live many times better than in any Arab country. It is a fact that there are no Arab refugees from either Israel or even the “occupied” territories.
      1. Vard
        Vard 10 January 2018 16: 18
        +2
        Something else on your sites other numbers ...
    2. 82т11
      82т11 10 January 2018 23: 07
      0
      Why alas? The road is there for them!
  4. mavrus
    mavrus 10 January 2018 10: 21
    +1
    Quote: Vard
    Alas ... It looks like in ten years ... fifteen, a country like Israel will become an Arab in a democratic way ... Already now, a third of the population there are not Jews ...

    The problems of Israel and Europe are two big differences. Israel a priori, from the day of its creation, has been in the Arabian environment, the Israeli mentality (with mother’s milk) is aimed at stiff opposition to the Islamic world, and the old Europe drove herself into this situation, thanks to her tolerance and inability to at least somehow defend herself from complete Islamization.
  5. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 10 January 2018 10: 25
    +4
    What the author wrote is second-order tasks. The task of the first plan is to consolidate society in Russia through fair and honest management of domestic socio-economic policies. If this is not done, it is unlikely that it will be possible to achieve the rest, because the enemy is going in exactly the same way, constantly weakening Russia. But unfortunately, capitalism, as a socio-political formation, is not capable of doing this, much less liberal capitalism in Russia. Therefore, everything that is written by the author is just empty Wishlist.
  6. Bastinda
    Bastinda 10 January 2018 10: 59
    +6
    At one time, Yasser Arafat used to say: "Our atomic bomb is the womb of an Arab woman." If this weapon is used in the interests of Russia, Europe can be destroyed once and for all, which means weakening both the Anglo-American core of the capitalist system and the very transatlantic link on which it relies heavily.

    If nuclear weapons are used in Europe, then in 10-15-20 years it will be possible to live there.
    If you use the "weapons of Arafat" against Europe, I doubt that it will be possible to live there in 300 years. And the harm to civilization and culture will be much greater.
  7. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 10 January 2018 12: 34
    +1
    Europe will catch fire - and we will burn.
    1. dSK
      dSK 11 January 2018 08: 46
      +1
      Hello Dmitry!
      Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
      Europe will light up

      Who benefits from the war in Europe? The answer is obvious - only not to Europeans. hi
  8. Des10
    Des10 10 January 2018 13: 41
    0
    What is the song about? laughing
    The predominance of quantitative and more active --- sweep away everything, and the euro, and other institutions of familiar life. Okay, that same Europa, and to look around --- it’s taxing (norms), but more enterprising and organized --- let's just say --- not us (well, like, people). Power will pass over to them soon - in a democratic way or by a quiet glancing --- it does not matter.
  9. San Sanych
    San Sanych 10 January 2018 13: 42
    +3
    What is there to blame for Europe? In Russia itself, it’s just right to rename Moscow to Moskabbad, and not only it, but also many other cities in the same way, because of corrupt officials and excessive greed of new business owners in the person of entrepreneurs angry
  10. VladGashek
    VladGashek 10 January 2018 14: 59
    +7
    About Europe is said in sufficient detail. But you need to see a bunch of Europe-Russia. The situation in this bundle is identical. Russia was even more subjected to a migrant invasion and there is no need to swim away to the cultural and historical proximity of migrants in our home. That was right about 10 years ago. Now a migrant in Russia is also far from Russian culture, like a migrant in Europe. The impact of migration on Russian realities is dangerous no less than its European counterpart. But our situation is complicated by the presence of a quarter of the Islamic indigenous population, which is much closer and more influenced by its Central Asian counterparts than its Russian neighbors. This moment should not be forgotten.
  11. Anyone
    Anyone 10 January 2018 15: 21
    +1
    ... any nationally oriented government in Russia will need to solve the problem of counteracting this expansion in the face of the inevitable confrontation with the West. Without a doubt, one defense is not enough to defeat the West.

    Does the author even know what year it is, what kind of economic system we have today, and that our ideology under the ridiculous, borrowed from the Yankees, name "sovereign democracy" is practically no different from the ideology of the United States? We are exactly the same capitalists as the Americans.
    PS The author seems to be living in some kind of illusion.
  12. Glory1974
    Glory1974 10 January 2018 16: 27
    +1
    System theory says that any system is stable if the percentage of disturbances is not more than 30%.
    If in Europe there are 500 million people, then they need 150 million Muslims for everything to become unstable.
    But if there is a “world backstage” that specifically wants to organize chaos, then the percentage may be less. Then much will already depend on the effectiveness of managing chaos and the forces opposing it.
  13. Mairos
    Mairos 10 January 2018 17: 11
    +1
    Quote: SHVEDsky_stol
    Provided that in Russia the same problem. There are almost 30% in pre-trial detention centers who are "come in large numbers", they do not talk about rape on TV at all.

    You are not right - they SHOW on us and then, the overwhelming majority, leaves. They don’t keep anyone on social benefits in Russia.
    1. Vvol
      Vvol 10 January 2018 19: 48
      +2
      The trouble is that in the event of social instability and the weakening of central authority (liberal coup d'etat in Moscow and the consequences), pogroms may occur with the participation of part of those who came in the country. So keeping the door wide open and then not having proper control over the “dear guests” is not a good idea in any country. Here in the UAE, yes - a migrant worker will be punished for attempting to mutilate. For just one attempt to pester a woman (for example, a foreign tourist who came to see the sights of Dubai), they will be fined $ 5000. If our law enforcement authorities were more zealous (!!!) and defended the law, then excuse me - we would the problem of migrants would not be so acute due to a sharp reduction in illegal migration.
    2. Vvol
      Vvol 10 January 2018 20: 06
      0
      And yes - you don’t need to portray all migrant workers as “honest hard workers” who are worried about how their family is at home, and therefore they do not need adventures. People come from Central Asia to work with us because everything is bad with work there. People are fleeing to us from poverty! - And many are forced to do this in an illegal capacity, if only to get to some Russian construction site, and to live in a cramped space ... So, among them there will certainly be a certain percentage of those who "have nothing to lose." And in which case, there is no guarantee that this percentage, or at least part of it, will not join any organized crime group, will not join the terrorists, or simply will not take part in any natural event ... If a person sees that already here the problems and vacillations began, and the country is gradually not getting to the "great construction sites", and at the same time will think - where should I return ?! into eternal poverty ?! - then enter the local cell of the evil ISIS to fight for the construction of the local "new and fair Caliphate" - what is not an option? And romance, and not this disgusting "social injustice" that here, that there, and even though you will not die of hunger at the expense of mutual assistance and trophies.
      1. Galleon
        Galleon 12 January 2018 18: 00
        0
        I can supplement your position with some examples: our cleaning company hires Kyrgyz people. They come here to work, because they are sent by the family - one son from the children goes, the earnings are sent home and this allows the rest not to endure the need. A few years later he returns, another rides. And at home they are normal people at home, one of us showed a photo - traditionally the family keeps horses, they play sports at the level of their country, when the riders take away the carcass of a sheep from each other and the one who rode off wins ... - I don’t know what it's called. That happens.
  14. Plate
    Plate 10 January 2018 19: 34
    0
    Create a neo-fascist regime

    And then gather armored armada and turn to the East in the name of expanding limited living space? No thanks. But I agree the method of destroying the capitalist core looks attractive. The main thing is then to transfer this destruction to the "core of the nucleus" - the United States, in order to definitely finish it off. And about fascist Europe ... I think that at the right time it will be possible to draw the UN to this matter, when it becomes clear that the capitalist system will not be able to recover.
  15. Brigadier
    Brigadier 10 January 2018 20: 52
    0
    Quote: Tatiana
    In my opinion, the author provocatively lures Russia into an adventurous political trap and does not think through to the end the negative consequences of his proposal for Russia itself in the future.

    The author reasoned correctly. And the correctness of his reasoning is that he sees that migration to Europe cannot be stopped yet.
    Migrants will come and multiply there at an accelerated pace, like containers ... sorry, like migrants receiving benefits that will help them multiply ... Well, you understand ... There will be a point! Whether we want it or not.
    And if migration and their accelerated reproduction cannot be stopped, the author simply perceives this as a fait accompli and offers to play his game in this part of the history of Russia that is beneficial only for it ... It is only in this part of the history, if migration takes place as a fact.
    What will happen next - time will tell ... And using in our favor the situation with these migrants in Europe (precisely in this section of history) we will be able to earn the necessary preferences in the future. And spit on what will happen to Europe! What will be, it will be ... Anyway, it does not depend on us.
    The Europeans themselves, with their own hands, opened the gates to hell! Let them get it in full. You have to pay for everything, including for the destruction of Libya, Iraq, Syria ... They themselves were the first to start, they themselves are to blame, even if they themselves rake for it ...
    You didn’t understand exactly these subtleties from the author’s reasoning ...