Military Review

Gazprom absorbs gas market in Europe and slaps US

142



Full fiasco. That is how it can be commented on for Europe the results of its more than a decade struggle against the “domination” of Gazprom. 36% of the gas market of the continent at the end of the year 2017 left for Russia.

When this struggle was just beginning in 2005, this figure was only 21%. Russia suffered a no less offensive defeat on the gas lists in the first days of 2018, to its main opponent, the United States. A year ago, the Americans talked about their ambitious plans to conquer the gas market in Europe, and today Russian gas saves the inhabitants of their eastern coast from freezing.

The capitulation of the gas market in Europe

In 2017, Russia once again increased its gas exports to Europe and set another record. 193,9 billion cubic meters, which is 14,6 billion cubic meters, or 8,1% higher than the record of the already record year 2016. At the same time, the currency earnings from the export of the Russian gas monopolist increased by more than 20% over the past year and will total more than 35 billion dollars. And even last year it did not reach the record 38 billion dollars, but next year, 2018, Gazprom has every reason to expect that this last record bar from the pre-crisis period will be taken by it.



To understand the importance of what happened, we must at least briefly recall the main zigzags of the European gas war. Two Maidan in Ukraine, attempts to stretch several alternative Russian gas pipes, the war in Syria and North Africa. These are all the battles of that war.

Yes, that's it. Only when it came to power, the third president of Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko, organized the first gas war with Russia, which, due to a “strange” coincidence, coincided with the beginning of the EU struggle against the Russian gas monopoly.

Then there was the “Arab Spring”. The redistribution of gas flows from North Africa and the Gulf countries was one of the main tasks of the beginning of a major war in the Middle East. As we remember, Qatar became one of the main sponsors of terrorism in Syria, who, as if quite by chance at this particular time, decided to stretch his first big gas pipe through Saudi Arabia to the Mediterranean Sea. But he could not, since the terrorists sponsored by him lost their war in the Syrian desert and thus buried the great plans for the redistribution of the gas market in Europe.

Moreover, Qatar was forced to bow to Russia and now fully coordinates with it the development of even its LNG projects.



Meanwhile, the 2014-17 years were the turning points in the gas war in the east of Europe. The stubbornness of Europeans against the background of the insanity unfolding in Ukraine was broken, and now European countries have not only practically stopped preventing Moscow from building new gas bypass pipelines, but have themselves begun to actively participate in them.

And the Ukrainian pipe from the main one is transferred to the discharge category.

What did they have to do if the prospects for the growth of gas supplies from North Africa did not materialize, Qatar capitulated, and the big gas from the US did not come? And it may not come, because recent events show that the Americans are far from getting along with the realization of their ambitious plans. Smooth they had on paper and language. But they forgot to coordinate their plans with the plans of the "heavenly" office and the plans of Moscow. And as time has shown, it was these two agreements that were necessary.

US gas shame

There is reason to believe that the so-called LNG gas from America will in many ways physically come from the terminal in the Russian port of Sabetta.



No, on paper it can be even Panamanian, and it will be loaded in the Russian Arctic. These are the laws of the market, and also the result of a sharp cooling in the North American continent, which continues for the third season in a row. This not only makes Americans feel uncomfortable in their homes today, but also forces businessmen (and politicians) to reconsider plans already announced for exporting American gas abroad. After all, first of all, the US president should supply his voters with gas, and not capricious Europeans. And with this today, official Washington has big problems.



The fact is that the main shale gas fields in the United States do not have sufficient buffer, that is, a significant number of underground gas storage facilities, where it would be possible to pump gas in the summer and from where it could be pumped out in winter. This makes American gas supplies not only unstable, but also seasonal. Moreover, Americans are forced to sell their gas in the summer, when the spot prices for it are minimal, and to buy in the winter, when they reach peak values.

For example, in early January 2018, the spot price for gas at the New York site reached 6 300 thousand dollars for 1000 cubes. That is, 50-60 times higher than the usual summer prices in the US and 30 times higher than the average in the European market today. Moreover, this picture is repeated every time the cold weather comes to the USA, and this has already become a “good” tradition.

But, as we understand, for American politicians monetary losses are not the most important. Their entire global suffocation scheme for Russia is crumbling. Europe is now accurately review their long-term plans and is clearly not in favor of the United States. For the European continent, which very quickly loses its own resources, the question of the stability of imports becomes a matter of survival.

In Norway today there is stagnation, and the Netherlands, following Great Britain, sharply reduces gas production.

That is why I understand why the leadership of Gazprom today is confident that at least until 2025, it will control all the same 35% of the European gas market. And then, maybe even more, since Norway, following its neighbors in the North Sea, very soon, too, will sharply reduce gas production, and there will be nothing for Europeans to replace it with internal resources.
Author:
142 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. MoJloT
    MoJloT 10 January 2018 15: 10
    12
    Gazprom absorbs gas market in Europe and slaps US

    As always, a very loud statement, and even so, in fact, part of Syria was chopped off by mattresses who would guarantee that the same branch of the gas pipeline would not be pulled through this piece, due to which the Middle East would burn.
    1. marlin1203
      marlin1203 10 January 2018 15: 42
      12
      A piece of something with the coast should be connected and pass through Syria
    2. allaykbar
      allaykbar 10 January 2018 15: 42
      14
      who will give guarantees that the very branch of the gas pipeline from which the Middle East is burning will not stretch through this piece.


      MTR of the Russian Federation or what other structures with the help of hired Arabs with TNT hands.

      It is difficult to pull the gas pipeline through a country on the territory of which there is the Russian Navy and in which relations with tribes and entire nationalities have been established with a 6-year war.

      In general, the leverage from there to kick the Americans is much less than the leverage on the integrity of a pipe
      1. MoJloT
        MoJloT 10 January 2018 16: 14
        +5
        Political will is needed for this.
        1. allaykbar
          allaykbar 10 January 2018 16: 15
          19
          the nuclear shield is already practically updated. the army is rearming. every year Will will become more.

          And the loud statements of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs without a strong army are the lot of Ukrainians. If the Kremlin does not yet feel within itself the strength to speak on equal terms with those who spend hundreds of times more on the army, then that means no time.

          And if you want to fight in unequal conditions - then I think there are many platforms - where you can fulfill your dream.

          Just don’t drag me with you. I’m for no good reason or because you want to make loud statements - I don’t want to sit in a trench
          1. Kent0001
            Kent0001 10 January 2018 16: 49
            +8
            Yes Yes. Only you forgot where and in what our reserves are stored. This is me about WILL, if that.
            1. Antianglosax
              Antianglosax 10 January 2018 18: 55
              15
              There can’t even be a word about the will - such qualities are unknown to the Kremlin thief. I wonder for what reason our Kremlin thieves do not want to sell gas for rubles? Merikosy, do you definitely urgently need Russian gas? Well, take it, but only for rubles! And, taking this opportunity, to declare to Western anthropoid animals that from now on and forever Russian resources are sold exclusively for rubles - oil, gas, titanium, gold, precious metals, LES, food, EVERYTHING only for rubles!
              China, having no such hydrocarbon reserves, has already launched an exchange where it is traded in RMB with the possibility of conversion to gold. We, like the last downs, sitting backwards on natural riches, give them for candy wrappers according to a perverted scheme! What prevents you from fully launching the St. Petersburg Exchange and trading for rubles?
              That's just it, that to our rulers over the country and the people to put on the high Kremlin tower! Thieves, traitors, opportunists, and liberal mattresses should be in prison, not in Gazprom and the Kremlin.
              And yet, yes, the destiny of legally incapable insolvent degenerates is to trade the country’s resources abolishly, but this does not stop them from paying taxes to the treasury less than in their own and western pockets.
              1. Victor N
                Victor N 10 January 2018 19: 31
                +7
                You need to be able to convert knowledge into ambition, and without it - zilch and drafts bare. Not interested!
              2. Kent0001
                Kent0001 10 January 2018 20: 00
                +6
                No one has been particularly trading for the yuan, and there will not be any more for rubles. Learn the economy.
                1. vadsonen
                  vadsonen 10 January 2018 20: 15
                  +1
                  No one really trades for the yuan

                  Only Iran (since 2012) and Russia (since 2014).
              3. Foxmara
                Foxmara 11 January 2018 07: 05
                +3
                The exchange in St. Petersburg has been launched, on which oil will be sold for rubles. hi
                Before screaming, you may be wondering what you are screaming about.
                There are true nuances, but you also need to find out about them, which is harder than shouting prosralipolymers
                https://mir24.tv/news/14387407/neft-za-rubli-ross
                iya-sobiraetsya-torgovat-syrem-za-svoyu-valyutu
              4. aleksander.kalabanov. 2015
                aleksander.kalabanov. 2015 16 January 2018 11: 48
                0
                that interferes and slows down, in my opinion the central bank.
            2. just exp
              just exp 10 January 2018 21: 51
              +9
              a hundred lard has no effect on the will, the mattresses spent 2 TRILLION on the war with Iraq, and on the whole BV there are 8, and this is only Iraq, whose army is even less equipped and the population was not as fought as our partisans (we have and the partisans will be better equipped than the army in Iraq), you imagine how much the war with the Russian Federation or China will pour out (this is due to the fact that China will definitely attack us, it makes no sense, it is easier for China to buy everything, unlike the states that are Roman and other empires where the economy is based on war and the plunder of conquered peoples)?
              so this one hundred lard is nothing at all on this scale.
              this is from the tribute section and the position of senior vassal.
              and this is regulated by the fact that in our country, because of the financial system, the number of rubles depends on the number of bucks in the economy, and if the bucks are safe, then a lot of rubles are printed, and this is inflation, so the bucks are withdrawn from the economy, but where to get them? only in reserves, one of the types of which are securities (they also bring profit). So when we had gold reserves of more than 600 billion, then investments in the state were also about a hundred. what do you think the rest of the half trillion was invested in?
              and now they’ve even eaten a little egg, it’s still a few hundred lard, and only a hundred are invested in the states.
              1. MoJloT
                MoJloT 11 January 2018 09: 38
                0
                At that time, the Iraqi army was 4 in size, and 1 in power in the Middle East! A very serious and dangerous opponent.
                1. vasya.pupkin
                  vasya.pupkin 11 January 2018 13: 31
                  +3
                  Quote: MoJloT
                  At that time, the Iraqi army was 4 in size, and 1 in power in the Middle East! A very serious and dangerous opponent.

                  And where does the quantity, the main thing, is the venality of generals.
                  "It’s all because of the grandmothers and you don’t have to shag your grandmother ..."
                  1. MoJloT
                    MoJloT 11 January 2018 13: 42
                    0
                    This is the same element of the struggle, the time of the knights is long gone. Have you forgotten how in the 90s of illegal agents our generals turned in for cervelat? How did the boys in Chechnya drive for a box of vodka for slaughter? Ours are even more petty, corrupt, cynical and will act just like the Iraqi only offer!
                2. just exp
                  just exp 11 January 2018 23: 59
                  0
                  this enemy could not even defeat Iran, and it was equipped only with danger to the Middle East, and his weapons were far from new.
                  although of course most of the armies of the world now can only dream about the volumes and types of weapons that were in service with Iraq. but with the states or even France, Iraq cannot compete. and not because of size, but because of manufacturability.
      2. dSK
        dSK 10 January 2018 19: 57
        +1
        Quote: allaykbar
        MTR of the Russian Federation or what other structures
        In contrast to the "godless" power of the USSR, modern, despite its many shortcomings, does not use in international activities "left" combat options, such as the Italian "red" brigades of the last century. A short joke from Soviet times: "The Vietnamese pilot Li Si Qing successfully shot down the B-52." Now it’s all "for garlic"and Russia, despite the heart-rending" Russophobic "cries of the Western" elite, "the world population respects. hi
        1. dSK
          dSK 10 January 2018 20: 59
          0


          “Due to the extreme weather conditions in New York, Westchester and Long Island, the emergency mode was announced. New York-based journalist Natalya Slavina told Facebook about the collapse that hit the airports in New York and New Jersey. Since the landing More than six hours passed before the Slavins left the airport, while the employees didn’t hand out their luggage and spoiled the stroller, a media worker said.
          "(Channel" Tsargrad "19: 52., 10.01.18/XNUMX/XNUMX)
    3. Kent0001
      Kent0001 10 January 2018 16: 44
      +2
      DO NOT stretch the risk branch so much that no one needs nafik.
    4. Navigator Basov
      Navigator Basov 11 January 2018 06: 19
      +1
      Even if it is just some piece under someone’s control (be it the Kurds or some other Islamic front), it’s not a state with a government in which billions will be invested in the construction of the gas pipeline. Not to mention the stability of such a territory. Yeah, Qatar will invest in construction, and then Assad will repulse these territories - very good prospects for Qatar.
    5. Anatoly R
      Anatoly R 14 January 2018 04: 55
      0
      MoJloT - Maybe, in theory, you can drag a gas pipeline, - the question is different, - the instability of the region. And they can completely undermine.
  2. Loess
    Loess 10 January 2018 15: 11
    +7
    In 2017, Russia again increased gas exports to Europe and set its next record
    This is all of course good, but the gas is still imported in the villages, and they don’t even dream about using gas for heating ... Is it really impossible to force Gazprom to connect a couple of thousand settlements in the outback every year? And not just to bring pipelines to the borders of the village, but to connect directly to the house? It’s not going to get poorer ... probably ... Or if we really needed a currency, we would sell gas for rubles, let the West buy rubles for our currency and pay them for our gas already.
    1. evil partisan
      evil partisan 10 January 2018 15: 24
      14
      Quote: Less
      Is it really impossible to force Gazprom to connect a couple of thousand settlements in the outback every year to gas?

      Local authorities are responsible for connecting settlements to gas pipelines. Gazprom has nothing to do with it. yes
      1. Loess
        Loess 10 January 2018 15: 30
        +5
        Yes, I know ... But somehow, the local authorities are not up to it ... Money is needed for everything, and doesn’t it matter to Gazprom which way it should lead? Well, I do not offer to distribute gas for free, only to create infrastructure)
        1. novel66
          novel66 10 January 2018 15: 46
          +9
          yes they, stooped dogs, they will tear off so much for the connection that imported gas will not seem expensive
          1. Loess
            Loess 10 January 2018 15: 50
            14
            Familiar as I found out the connection price tag I set myself a solid fuel boiler)
            1. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 10 January 2018 16: 25
              15
              Quote: Less
              Familiar as I found out the connection price tag I set myself a solid fuel boiler)

              We will soon translate cars to solid fuel. Glory to Putin, glory to Gasprom, glory to Miller, his mother.
              1. Loess
                Loess 10 January 2018 18: 23
                14
                In the photo, there’s a completely new car, quite decent wheels and good tires, hence the conclusion - the carrier had golden hands and nowhere to put the "loot", and not from need he made this unit. And, I don’t know about you, but I was taught at school that surnames are capitalized. Not everything can be fine with literacy myself, but I learned this from the first grade.
                1. Sling cutter
                  Sling cutter 10 January 2018 18: 35
                  +3
                  Quote: Less
                  hence the conclusion - the carrier had golden hands and nowhere to put the "loot", and not out of need, he made this unit

                  Say it is your opinion hi
                  Quote: Less
                  And, I don’t know about you, but I was taught at school that surnames are capitalized.

                  This is not from illiteracy, it is a tribute to tradition. wink
                  1. Loess
                    Loess 10 January 2018 18: 57
                    +5
                    I do not know such a tradition.
                    1. Sling cutter
                      Sling cutter 10 January 2018 19: 12
                      +3
                      Quote: Less
                      I do not know such a tradition.

                      I’ll write these comrades. good
                      1. Loess
                        Loess 10 January 2018 20: 59
                        +5
                        Clearly, only a little about something else. They are too lazy to write a letter about the capital letter, they can’t bring a piece of paper to the ballot box - they throw it on the lawn, they will not give up the place to the old woman on the bus, but all the same - we have bad power, disperse the government, change the president. It just seems to me that the new government will not clean up the rubbish for you either, and it will not teach you the place to give to the old people either. Of course, I exaggerate a little, but
                      2. Foxmara
                        Foxmara 11 January 2018 07: 45
                        +3
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        I’ll write these comrades.

                        The rules are the same in Russian.
                        And the "comrade" was never a comrade. An oligarch who leases land near Moscow, who sells Turkish strawberries under the brand of the Lenin state farm — he will lease all of Russia.
                        True, mattresses also approved him, in general (in the media) and in private (McFall) soldier
                        But we have freedom, agitate, vote)))
                2. SOF
                  SOF 10 January 2018 18: 50
                  0
                  It’s just that when you need to dig deeper into the country, where didn’t you come from ... patriot laughing
              2. opus
                opus 11 January 2018 01: 50
                +3
                Quote: Stroporez
                We and cars will soon transfer to solid fuel. Glory to Putin

                Stroporez ...
                1. The house is heated by gas, is there a gas boiler?
                2. When does GC check out?
                Shl. I ran into.
                -Time of verification (guarantees for indications) passed
                I bought a counter (I waited for 2 for a month)
                - do not put pID0ggi (well, everyone understood, what I mean)
                need to conclude a contract for "service" fool
                3500p per year.
                According to the order of the Government of the Russian Federation (well, this iphone)
                3500p (every year)
                = and what do they do for 3500r per year ===> ZERO
                so I came to refueling lukoil, there solarium already on 40р / p [b] [/ b] good
                What kind of fagot with me requires a service contract?
              3. Foxmara
                Foxmara 11 January 2018 07: 29
                0
                "We will soon convert cars to solid fuel. Glory to Putin, glory to Gasprom, glory to Miller, his mother."
                lol
                I put gas on Kalina-Cross two months ago and I’m not blowing it in my mustache. Last refueling last year. Gas at 19.50. Some years. A cylinder of 36 liters is enough in the city for 290 kilometers on average.
              4. Anatoly R
                Anatoly R 14 January 2018 05: 02
                0
                So it won’t work. It is necessary to force the auto industry to make cars running on wood, or coal. AND GLORY TO HIS GASPROM
            2. BecmepH
              BecmepH 11 January 2018 10: 32
              0
              Quote: Less
              Familiar as I found out the connection price tag I set myself a solid fuel boiler)

              Yes, the price tag is high. A year ago, I also wanted to install a TT boiler, looking at the price tag. But, smart people put a calculator in their hands ... And on the forums I read how to choose a cleaver, how to use the TT boiler correctly, so as not to freeze and try to sleep. By the way, to sleep normally with a TT boiler, you need to purchase a gas that is comparable in price to a gas connection.
        2. allaykbar
          allaykbar 10 January 2018 15: 49
          10
          Well, I do not offer to distribute gas for free, only to create infrastructure)


          when calculating the cost for consumers, the infrastructure will also be advantageous. And if the NP is small - then GAS for the village will be gold
      2. antivirus
        antivirus 10 January 2018 18: 26
        0
        uncle jokes - no one is responsible for connecting - only for receiving
      3. SPLV
        SPLV 10 January 2018 19: 18
        +7
        Quote: Angry Guerrilla
        local authorities are responsible. Gazprom has nothing to do with it

        Naturally. Non-local authorities have long decided that connecting to natural gas is not profitable for settlements with a population of less than 100 000. Those villages that were connected under the Soviet regime remained, and new ones might not even dream. Mr. So has already said - it’s not hell to live in the villages, come to me in Moscow, and Mr. Me also spoke about the teachers somewhere in the same way. This is Lenin GOELRO (electrification) introduced. The current GOGARO (gasification) is not interesting. What to take from a retired grandmother? The village is dying out. You won’t make money on a Ferrari.
    2. Kent0001
      Kent0001 10 January 2018 16: 53
      +8
      No, Gazprom will not deal with this, I think there is no money or directions, although they are doing something in this direction. Gazprom right now, the Sultan pulls two branches for his grandmothers, plus a pipe for the Chinese, the same currency in the future, and in the village for gas gas and then at prices below world prices. Nobody canceled the laws of the market, as well as the payment and bonuses to Miller and his team.
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack 10 January 2018 17: 21
        +8
        Ah, you sing beautifully ... I already listened laughing
        Quote: Kent0001
        ... in the village for gas, rubles, and then at prices below world prices ...

        Is it good or bad?
        Quote: Kent0001
        Nobody repealed market laws

        And this is right. Or are you, like that new Russian from a joke - you buy for a thousand what you can buy for a rupee?
        Quote: Kent0001
        there is a currency in perspective

        How much of that currency falls into the budget, take an interest. You will be very surprised.
        Quote: Kent0001
        pay and bonuses to Miller and his team

        These are seeds compared to Gazprom volumes yes
        1. SPLV
          SPLV 10 January 2018 19: 22
          +1
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          These are seeds compared to Gazprom volumes

          A penny saves the ruble. This is reminiscent of an ideology: Well, I took kamaz bricks from work, the state will not become poor. Oh well.
          1. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 10 January 2018 20: 52
            +8
            Quote: SPLV
            A penny saves a ruble

            Undoubtedly.
            Only Gazprom has subsidiaries in Europe, for example.
            Take an interest in salaries of "Top Management" in Europe, you will be surprised, I guarantee.
            It would be strange if the management of the parent company was paid lower than the management of its subsidiaries.
            So no?
            Second: that Gazprom, that Rosneft - companies of strategic importance.
            A gas needle - it, unlike the usual, with two sharp ends. And the gas consumer "sits" on this needle, as it were, not denser (and deeper) than the supplier.
            That is why the issues of gas supply on a “state scale” allow solving quite serious political issues.
            The same Miller is quite a serious politician.
            Not to mention the fact that for information that is not owned by Miller, but by the fifth assistant of his third deputy, any more or less serious state will pay several times more than they now have salaries.
            Is it all worth the money?
            IMHO yes yes
            1. Okolotochny
              Okolotochny 11 January 2018 00: 34
              +6
              Novel, hi , in support of your words (indirect), the heads of the Security Council of Rosneft and Gazprom are appointed acting senior officers of the FSB.
    3. Victor N
      Victor N 10 January 2018 19: 35
      +1
      Loess, why force? After all, there are their employees.
      In the vastness of Russia, our ancestors didn’t even build enough roads, and it’s not long before the gas pipelines reach - bad luck with geography.
    4. Navigator Basov
      Navigator Basov 11 January 2018 06: 33
      +1
      It is simply unprofitable on a large territory, because gasification is underway, but of course is stalled. So this problem is complex. Well, here it is: probably - it explains everything in your comment. A seasoned expert can google the structure of investments in gasification (of Gazprom, and the administrations of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation), the volume of investments, the rate of gasification, and also the debt owed to Gazprom for gas supply. Or maybe even forgive everyone the debts for gas? Well, Gazprom will not become poorer ... probably ...
      And in general, let the West dance to our tune, the West for a long time and surely decay and fall apart, and we only do what we get up off our knees. Well, seriously, gas supply contracts to Europe have been in force for many years, were concluded even under the EBN in the era of active licking, and why would European countries agree to ruble payments in the current global practice of dollar payments? In any case, the revision of such agreements is a very long and complex process, even with favorable market and political conditions, and it is only just starting to turn in a favorable direction.
    5. bobba94
      bobba94 12 January 2018 21: 57
      +3
      "Make Gazprom ...." The niece lives in a cottage village 5 km from Nuremberg. The village of houses 30. The gas distribution company refused to pull the gas pipeline into the village, since it is not economically profitable for it. The owners gathered, took a loan from a bank, hired builders and handed a small gas pipeline to their village, connected to the highway. This is in faded Germany, where the degree of social. security rolls over. This is called market relations (capitalism).
  3. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 10 January 2018 15: 50
    15
    How glad I am for Gazprom ... That's just the word "ours" in this sentence somehow I could not write ...
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 10 January 2018 16: 04
      21
      inspired by ...
      Putin said - "... we began to live better ..."
      people answered - "... we are happy for you ..."
      1. allaykbar
        allaykbar 10 January 2018 16: 08
        15
        cool joke. It’s a pity Putin didn’t arrange your life kepmor.

        That's just the word "ours" in this sentence I could not write somehow ...


        do you think pensions and maternity capital pay taxes on the sale of Lada Vesta in Europe?

        Or maybe we overwhelmed Europe with cool smartphones in the amount of a couple of billion pieces?

        In my opinion, Gazprom went into almost every home in Europe, and all social workers in the country feed on this? (40 million so)

        And if so, it turns out that Gazprom is ours? And if not ours, then why should he feed pensioners and mothers?

        1. kepmor
          kepmor 10 January 2018 16: 21
          +7
          don’t worry, give birth ... I’ve already arranged my own and the life of my loved ones ... not thanks, but contrary to the efforts of our rulers ... take care of yourself ...
          1. allaykbar
            allaykbar 10 January 2018 16: 24
            11
            could you even without Putin’s will for it? belay Oh wow

            not thanks, but contrary to the efforts of our rulers ...


            this is you beautiful. And then everyone usually does not live like that. For all, usually the government and Putin are wiped and the table is set

            It’s not funny to flaunt such topics yourself?

            you're like andrej-shironov, who says that he himself ensured the safety of his family and for this he didn’t have to go to the army and he didn’t need the police, and Putin, along with his government

            You’re all wrestlers here, independent) Organizers of their lives and worrying about starving pensioners)
        2. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 10 January 2018 16: 43
          15
          Quote: allaykbar
          And if so, it turns out that Gazprom is ours?

          for fun, look at the structure of shareholders (owners) of gasprom, and then about the "laying" in the form of Rosneftegaz.
          Too lazy to even comment on all these nonsense about the gasprom, getting up, and the permalogs.
          Even already in the zombies, they refused advertising about Gorgas.
          1. allaykbar
            allaykbar 10 January 2018 16: 47
            +8
            Sling cutter, why are pensions paid? What do I need this structure or what does a pensioner care for if it receives a pension from the sale of gas and oil?

            What is the difference between a mother who receives child support and a mother’s capital, who sits on the board of Gazprom and Rosneft, if she receives money thanks to them? and not contrary to how many people like to talk here

            Do you recognize that the entire social policy of our state is money from mining?

            Or do you think this is other money? Maybe they are taken from the taxes of medium-sized businesses? Probably from sales of Yotafonov? Or from the sale of superjets?
            1. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 10 January 2018 17: 06
              +8
              Quote: allaykbar
              What do I need this structure or what does a pensioner care for if it receives a pension from the sale of gas and oil?

              And I thought from the FIU belay
              Quote: allaykbar
              You acknowledge that the entire social policy of our state

              Honestly, I do not admit that there is a social policy in the Russian Federation.
              Quote: allaykbar
              Maybe they are taken from the taxes of medium-sized businesses?

              Have you heard that in Russia gas is not made from oil, as in the whole world, but from excise taxes.
              Quote: allaykbar
              Or do you think this is other money?

              So that we do not have a dispute, I want the gas to run out.

              Threat. By the way, we also make alcohol from gas. wink
              1. allaykbar
                allaykbar 10 January 2018 17: 07
                +6
                And I thought from the FIU


                Well this is funny and naive! Pensioners generally lived in another country. And what was deducted to the fund of that country - everything was about .. lost-stolen

                We have more than 40 million pensioners.

                Honestly, I do not admit that there is a social policy in the Russian Federation.


                then you need to undergo treatment in the USA and look at the bill. Yes, and the school will have to pay both teachers and kindergarten - and not at 3 rubles a month.

                And free higher education will have to be forgotten altogether.

                Of course, we do not have the USSR, but also not wild capitalism.

                So that we do not have a dispute, I want the gas to run out.


                We will survive with you. But retirees will be tight. And the state will cease to subsidize many areas.

                In general, everyone who cannot work due to various reasons will die out.

                And everyone will forget what the lists of debts for rent at the entrance are - everyone will simply be evicted. After a couple of months delay.

                1. Sling cutter
                  Sling cutter 10 January 2018 17: 29
                  +9
                  Quote: allaykbar
                  then you need to undergo treatment in the USA and look at the bill.

                  Colleague, I was in Canada and I can report to you that the local medicine serves even homeless people.
                  Quote: allaykbar
                  We will survive with you.

                  So you want to say that we don’t have to live normally, but we need to constantly survive?
                  Quote: allaykbar
                  But retirees will be tight.

                  Handouts from the gentleman's shoulder?
                  Our whole discussion is to find out whose gazmyas? Once again, I ask you to bring the shareholder structure. I continue to assert that there is NOTHING to the people in this cjsc! Otherwise, the issue of nationalization of natural resources would not be a question. The owners, to whom the population of the Russian Federation does not belong, are primarily interested in increasing production and supplies.
                  And here is one interesting fact for you, a certain Potanin (this is the one that Norilsk-Nickel picked up), transferred 500 million raccoons to AMERICAN charity funds in the new year, in exchange for the loyalty of the mattresses during the February cleanings of our moneybags. What is it ?!
                  here you are for clarity
            2. SOF
              SOF 10 January 2018 18: 57
              +3
              Quote: allaykbar
              Sling cutter, why are pensions paid?

              And why do you need to know the "patriots"? After all, they believe that everything on the trees grows ...
              And anticipating angry speeches like: "Take everything! Dispossess all! Shoot everyone, as the Great Bequeathed ..., L ..., T ... (underline) - I will answer right away:" Fuck you, not a new revolution. .. "
              1. The comment was deleted.
            3. SPLV
              SPLV 10 January 2018 19: 35
              +4
              Quote: allaykbar
              What is the difference between a mother who receives child support and maternal capital

              Answer yourself: but on horseradish goat button accordion, that is, why would the mother need these handouts if every man could provide his family (wife, children, the elderly) with his work? I think the demographic problem would be solved by itself. Oh!
            4. Antianglosax
              Antianglosax 10 January 2018 20: 11
              +6
              Quote: allaykbar
              Do you recognize that the entire social policy of our state is money from mining?

              Rumor has it that so much good is done from oil and gas that listing will take more than one strip. So I think with my small brain, but is it not much, much more efficient to establish the production of at least the most popular goods and sell them? Well ё-mine !, the production of at least the whole range of wood products, why not fix it? Here hellish technology is not required! And sell not the forest, but the goods! Does everyone feel the difference? Whoever does not want, let him go in the steppe - to South Africa, Brazil ... Although it is possible to enter into a cartel agreement with them in the forest. Because Western geeks are not suicides to cut down their forests, they will take, all the more so, our goods, as it were, will be better manufactured. And so with all the resources to do, and not give titanium to non-humans for nothing. Then social policy can be improved. The trouble is that the Kremlin’s thieves are temporary workers, so they can’t get enough of it ..
        3. Kent0001
          Kent0001 10 January 2018 16: 54
          0
          They gave privileges in my opinion.
    2. vlad_vlad
      vlad_vlad 10 January 2018 18: 37
      +9
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      How glad I am for Gazprom ... That's just the word "ours" in this sentence somehow I could not write ...


      this year, according to the results of Gazprom’s work, some manager of Gazprom will receive the 8th million, some Elena Viktorovna Ivanova will receive the 8th promise to gasify her house right tomorrow.
      those. all will get something. Everyone has something to be proud of.
      Gazprom is a national treasure, a state-owned company, and not all imperialist capitalists there.
  4. thinker
    thinker 10 January 2018 15: 54
    +2
    6 300 thousand dollars per 1000 cubic meters
    They forgot a comma ($ 6,3 thousand). And yes, the cold is not aunt yes
    The French company Engie will deliver to Boston from the UK a batch of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Novatek plant in Yamal, Kommersant reports citing sources among traders.

    https://www.rubaltic.ru/news/09012018-ssha-priobr
    eli-partiyu-szhizhennogo-gaza-iz-rossii /
    1. dSK
      dSK 10 January 2018 20: 19
      +1
      Hello Vladimir Alexandrovich!
      Quote: thinker
      the cold is not aunt
      Details: "In Europe, Russia sells natural (pipe) gas at about 180 dollars for 1 thousand cubic meters. " Unfortunately, not us, but the French will make good money on the resale of Russian gas.
  5. Curious
    Curious 10 January 2018 16: 05
    20
    It seems that the analytics for the site are selected according to the principle - the farther from the subject, the better. So the author of today's article rejoices in the "conquest" of the gas market.
    Yes, the products of the natural resource complex are always in demand. And at the same time, the extraction and processing of mineral raw materials and mining production is the lot of developing countries, and developed countries are increasing high-tech production.
    There is such a dwarf state of Nauru on the coral island of the same name in the Western Pacific Ocean with an area of ​​21,3 km². This island consisted practically of phosphates. The population of the island did not work for many years, selling just land from their island. According to per capita income — 13 thousand US dollars — in the 1970-1980s, it belonged to the richest countries in the world. And then the phosphates ran out. Only the destroyed ecology remained. Now the basis of the economy is the alms of Australia. This is called a "resource curse." Both gas and oil are non-renewable resources. And the author rejoices that the country is selling them more and more.
    1. allaykbar
      allaykbar 10 January 2018 16: 12
      +8
      in 16, the Russian Federation was in 4th place in the world in terms of industrial production

      so the story about the island is laid out under the flag that you posted - I perceive with a smile

      In terms of production, we went around not only Germany, but also Japan.

      So suffer for us somewhere else) You may suffer along with those who guessed to poink your text mattress)
      1. Curious
        Curious 10 January 2018 16: 29
        +8
        And with a smile, I take your pride in fourth place, taken from amateur analysis on the net. As for another place ... Create your own website and distribute places there. And here you yourself understand ...
        1. allaykbar
          allaykbar 10 January 2018 16: 31
          +4
          On my site, I will put Ukraine in the first place. and you will become an example to us. How to live.
          1. Curious
            Curious 10 January 2018 16: 32
            +3
            The flag is in your hands ...
            1. just exp
              just exp 10 January 2018 22: 14
              0
              Stopped letting you into Poland, have you decided to earn some money here?
      2. Gardamir
        Gardamir 10 January 2018 16: 33
        +6
        By production volumes
        ? In terms of trade in natural resources of Russia!
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 10 January 2018 21: 12
          +3
          In terms of industrial production, gas production and transportation and its storage, this is industry - from the production of nuts, to storage tanks, transportation and production equipment.
        2. just exp
          just exp 10 January 2018 22: 12
          +3
          Do you think that nothing is being done?
          I will disappoint you, almost everything is manufactured in Russia, from planes and rockets, to satellites and computers, from socks, to machine tools, from railway cars, to tankers and bulk carriers, objects of any complexity are being built, from the largest bridges, to stadiums and skyscrapers.
          so that we will somehow survive Nauru, the main thing is that you would not worry about us.
          we are so calmer.
          1. Curious
            Curious 11 January 2018 00: 29
            +2
            Well, everyone knows about the construction of stadiums, the most famous is the Zenit-Arena, which set a world record for rising in price during the construction process.
            1. BecmepH
              BecmepH 11 January 2018 11: 03
              0
              Quote: Curious
              Well, everyone knows about the construction of stadiums, the most famous is the Zenit-Arena, which set a world record for rising in price during the construction process.

              And also the Crimean bridge is not completed ... It is terrible to think. Scary and sad ...
            2. just exp
              just exp 11 January 2018 23: 56
              0
              Well, we have one stadium, and the Americans have a whole program of combat lasers, railguns and destroyers, which will be silenced.
              the same you say that mattresses are not able to build?
      3. BecmepH
        BecmepH 11 January 2018 10: 59
        0
        Quote: allaykbar
        In the year 16, the Russian Federation was in 4th place in the world in terms of industrial production

        per capita?
        1. allaykbar
          allaykbar 11 January 2018 13: 46
          +2
          of course. Such calculations do so.
      4. Pyromaniac
        Pyromaniac 12 January 2018 17: 18
        0
        what the heck is the volume of production? For some reason I don’t see a single working plant or factory producing something. And those that have not yet gone bankrupt exist for money from renting space or from reselling similar products made in China, Turkey, the UAE, etc.
    2. rice
      rice 10 January 2018 18: 38
      +3
      Quote: Curious
      this is the lot of developing states

      A good developing country in the USA sells both oil and gas. And Britain, when it was considered a great country, sold Cardiff coal with might and main.
      Britain switched from wind to coal in the 19th century. Replaced sailboats with steam boilers and became Great. Oil is cooler than coal. The United States switched to oil in the 20th century and pushed Britain away
      1. Curious
        Curious 10 January 2018 19: 59
        +4
        "Oil is cooler than coal."
        And knowledge is cooler than ignorance. Have you heard about the structure of the economy? And what about the structure of the American economy?
        1. rice
          rice 11 January 2018 15: 39
          0
          Quote: Curious
          And what about the structure of the American economy?

          A powerful military-industrial complex, highly developed oil and gas production and refining, most of the production is brought to third world countries. And just a huge number of exchange and speculative operations. And competitors, or buyers of this oil, are the loudest shouting about Russia's "dependence" on oil. Well, liberals to the heap. On the notorious "oil needle" sit all industrialized countries of the world. "Oil collapse" will not be individually Russian, but global.
    3. boboss
      boboss 10 January 2018 20: 46
      0
      yes, it's time to think .... left for 400 years
      1. Curious
        Curious 10 January 2018 20: 50
        0
        Extra toe.
    4. Foxmara
      Foxmara 11 January 2018 07: 58
      0
      Quote: Curious
      And at the same time, the extraction and processing of mineral raw materials and mining is the lot of developing countries,

      Such as the USA, Canada, Norway, UAE, Qatar .. the list can be extended laughing
      I have always thought that this is the lot of states that have resources, and it turns out that it is only developing.
      For reference, it was at the time that England (coal) and the USA (oil) rose on raw materials.
      1. Curious
        Curious 11 January 2018 13: 39
        0
        The key phrase is "in due time." This time how many years ago was?
        1. allaykbar
          allaykbar 11 January 2018 13: 46
          +2
          it was when we had not heard about Ukraine laughing

          But both oil and coal since they have influenced the whole world, they are. Because of them, wars begin and end. Fuel is the engine of everything

          It seems to me all your posts in this thread from envy)

          And about industrial production it’s generally funny to read your comments.

          I can spread the whole day here production, which were opened only in the 17th year. And until the end of the year 18, I don’t have enough time to put here all the production open since 2008

          if you don’t see this from Ukraine, this is normal. Here in Russia, few people see - because such a space is huge - that if everything was concentrated within the garden ring - everyone would gasp. And it’s not very noticeable.

          Reading where plants are opened - I understand that before this article I did not hear at all that in Russia there is such a settlement
          1. Curious
            Curious 11 January 2018 17: 35
            +1
            “I can spread the whole day here the production that was opened only in the year 17. And until the end of the 18th I don’t have enough time to put here all the production open since 2008”
            No need to engage in such unproductive work. There is an excellent site "Made with us", there are other resources with detailed information.
            And the second point. There is no need to rush through the open door, as in my comments it is not written anywhere that production facilities are not being built in Russia. The question was about the export of energy resources and the degree of dependence of the economy on it.
            Well, she smiled about the insult. It is more about you.
          2. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 11 January 2018 17: 41
            +1
            Quote: allaykbar
            I can spread the whole day here production, which were opened only in the 17th year.

            Production of glass containers? laughing Come on, go ahead.
            But during the Putin years of enterprises, 700000 were destroyed, entire industries were destroyed!
            And "doneunas" is the same hat as the lady’s government yes
  6. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 10 January 2018 16: 08
    +7
    Ahahaha! laughing We sit with my wife for dinner, with my eighth hand (hi ​​Golovan), I talk in nete and read articles. Bah! I look at the article with a bright title. My wife and I argued over a bottle of brandy or Martini, who is the author. And I won !!!! Yuri, thank you for a bottle of good cognac good
  7. Rusland
    Rusland 10 January 2018 16: 11
    11
    And after five years, the next lawsuits, they say it’s painfully expensive, you sold your gas to us, we froze, but you didn’t send us a meeting.
  8. Altona
    Altona 10 January 2018 16: 25
    12
    Quote: MoJloT
    As always, a very loud statement, and even so, in fact, part of Syria was chopped off by mattresses who would guarantee that the same branch of the gas pipeline would not be pulled through this piece, due to which the Middle East would burn.

    ----------------------------
    The mattresses chopped off almost all of Ukraine and a small part of Syria to impede the export of Russian gas. But now these are suitcases without a handle. Anaconda does not work. Gazprom without the videoconferencing system and the entire Russian army, of course, also does not work. I’m telling you all the way that Crimea and Syria are Gazprom’s wars. And constant broadcasts about Ukraine, they are also Gazprom. Evil Ukrainian Nazis, they interfere with our transit. The puzzle just stacks up. And you all, here is Putin, but he is our intercessor, the reliable sovereign. Gazprom, he is an intercessor, not yours.
    1. vadsonen
      vadsonen 10 January 2018 20: 34
      +2
      The mattresses chopped off almost all of Ukraine ... to impede the export of Russian gas.

      Why didn’t they blow up the pipe? And why are they still insisting on continuing transit through U?
  9. Gardamir
    Gardamir 10 January 2018 16: 29
    14
    Happiness is what! Only I live in Russia. How is gas for residents of Russia?
  10. Kent0001
    Kent0001 10 January 2018 16: 43
    +5
    Well, yes, we have nothing to sell except gas. And for amers, the sale of gas is associated revenue. They sell high-tech products with high added value. Although for us, Gazprom sold more gas, and it’s a joy, where else will we take the currency.
  11. San Sanych
    San Sanych 10 January 2018 17: 36
    15
    The USA produces 12 million cars a year, 2nd place after China (!), Once it was the first, but the Chinese now produce 28 million, and 20 years ago China produced less cars than Russia, which is now in 16th place, Russia now produces 1,3 million cars, less than the small Czech Republic, and even less than India and Mexico (!), which were never the grandees of the global automotive industry) That's it, just one gas and trade, yes oil (There is nothing to be proud of (
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 10 January 2018 21: 35
      +3
      And also we trade: reactors, satellites, rocket engines, military equipment, construction equipment, chemical components, alloys: high-quality, high-quality and extra-high-quality, titanium billets, aviation materials, medical preparations, isotopes, nuclear fuel - fuel elements, software, even checkpoint details - for "Formula One" and much more.
      1. San Sanych
        San Sanych 11 January 2018 11: 47
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        And also we trade: reactors, satellites, rocket engines, military equipment, construction equipment, chemical components, alloys: high-quality, high-quality and extra-high-quality, titanium billets, aviation materials, medical preparations, isotopes, nuclear fuel - fuel elements, software, even checkpoint details - for "Formula One" and much more.

        Of high-tech products, only arms exports give Russia $ 14 billion, and everything else you listed is crumbs. Little South Korea exports 88 billion dollars of electronics alone, so what, even Vietnam sells the same electronics for 20 billion exports, Russia with its 5 billion in 33rd place in the world. The domestic aircraft industry is killed, instead of aircraft we sell aluminum and titanium. Brazil, and that produces more aircraft than Russia request
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 11 January 2018 19: 18
          +1
          What are you - one nuclear plant costs 580 billion rubles for export. South Korea, yes, it produces electronics - most consumer goods and anything high-tech are not there, well, except for OLED displays.
          1. San Sanych
            San Sanych 11 January 2018 19: 47
            +1
            The cost of one reactor is 5 billion dollars, since 1998 Russia has built 7 power units for 4 nuclear power plants for 20 years, for a total of 35 billion dollars. As for South Korean electronics, we now have almost no consumer goods, and we have solid imports in stores.
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 14 January 2018 20: 11
              0
              We forgot about maintenance and fuel for these nuclear power plants, everything is done here, from pins with TVs to foreign brands to measuring instruments and consumables.
    2. Foxmara
      Foxmara 11 January 2018 08: 04
      0
      Quote: San Sanych
      That's it, only with one gas and trade, but with oil (There is nothing to be proud of (

      Wheat export. offhand. The first place is Russia.
      Atomic technology. Construction of nuclear power plants, utilization, storage, processing, sale of electricity.
      Satellites, delivery of astronauts into orbit.
      Military-industrial complex, the world's best air defense systems, the world's best fighters, electronic warfare systems.
      Stand in a corner and cry.
  12. Bumblebee_3
    Bumblebee_3 10 January 2018 17: 55
    +5
    Quote from the article: "After all, first and foremost, the US president must provide gas to his voters, and not to capricious Europeans." Well, who will say that this is not right?
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 10 January 2018 23: 08
      +2
      Quote: Bumblebee_3
      Well, who will say that this is not right?

      So, nobody argues, otherwise it would be a very worthless president ... well, like Petrygi from 404. The thing is different. As they say, the hall was yelling to the whole world about its own coolness, not listening to the weather forecast? laughing
  13. Vasya Vassin
    Vasya Vassin 10 January 2018 17: 57
    14
    For about five minutes he wiped away the tears of emotion from such encouraging news. How wonderful that someone will be good at stuffing his pocket with money for our folk resources again!
  14. Altona
    Altona 10 January 2018 17: 59
    10
    Quote: Kent0001
    Well, yes, we have nothing to sell except gas. And for amers, the sale of gas is associated revenue

    --------------------------------
    Therefore, there is such pressure on Gazprom and those points where it is going to export. To deprive Russia of money in general. And a paradoxical situation is developing - Gazprom needs both liberals and patriots at the same time. Liberals are needed for trade with the West and the accumulation of their wealth there. Patriots are needed to blame everything on the State Department, to expose the cardboard Navalny and the “evil commies”, to rejoice that our army has freed oil and gas territories for Gazprom. And therefore, for Gazprom there is no enemy worse than genuine communists who want to revive their own industry in the country. Therefore, mantras are sung about "foreign investors" who will build a factory, pollute the environment, will not pay taxes and where the "advanced" Russian consumer Vanka will work. And now they don’t want to take Russian Vanka either. Because Gazprom strongly dislikes his dad, the USSR, to whom he owes everything. Who explored the Urengoy field, which, under sanctions, extended a pipeline of large diameter pipes, which guarded half of Europe with its troops. And which Gazprom and other figures sold for three pennies to the Americans.
  15. peta locksmith
    peta locksmith 10 January 2018 18: 08
    +6
    it would be better to swallow the domestic market of Russia -

    "... In 2005-2016 ... the country's gasification level was increased from 53,3% to 67,2%. Including in cities - from 60% to 70,9%, in rural areas - from 34,8 % to 57,1%. " http://www.gazprom.ru/press/news/2017/october/art
    icle372824 /

    there is no data for 2017 yet - but it is unlikely that the increase in the level of gasification will surprise

    a third of cities and half of rural settlements in the Russian Federation are not gasified! - and Gazprom, which lives on in the public domain, started a fight in the sandbox with slider players

    "The level of gasification in Russia can grow to a maximum of 90%. Moreover, this level will be reached no earlier than 2030." http://www.mk.ru/economics/2017/04/11/rossi
    ya-bez-gaza-pochemu-tret-strany-im-postydno-ne-ob
    espechena.html
  16. SPLV
    SPLV 10 January 2018 19: 03
    +7
    .Gazprom management today is confident that, at least until 2025, it will control all the same 35% of the European gas market

    Yes, only this makes us neither cold nor hot. Unless, among us there are shareholders of Gazprom. This is good for them. Only all these victories ultimately lead to new clashes in the struggle for resources. But forelocks will crack with us, and not with the lords from Gazprom.
  17. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 10 January 2018 20: 21
    +5
    Quote: Antianglosaks
    such qualities are unknown to the Kremlin thief

    Minin - Pozharsky
    Look prince
    What a scum
    Started up in the Moscow Kremlin!
  18. Brigadier
    Brigadier 10 January 2018 20: 26
    +5
    Quote: Antianglosaks
    to our rulers over the country and the people put on the high Kremlin tower! Thieves, traitors, opportunists, and liberal mattresses should be in prison, not in Gazprom and the Kremlin.

    You would also ask why Chubais, Kudrin, Nabiulina and other "effective managers" who are lowering our economy lower and lower are still not sewing in the mittens zone, but in the mittens zone ...
    Will our most-most-most offend them?
    Therefore, EVERYONE VOTES FOR THE BREAST!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. boboss
    boboss 10 January 2018 20: 41
    +1
    What a nightmare! Europe will perish from Russian gas!
  20. WarriorWolf
    WarriorWolf 10 January 2018 20: 44
    +8
    Gazprom won, 2016 a record, and 2017 is much cooler, bigger, more expensive ... But I apologize kaneshno, but where is the practical benefit for the citizens of the Russian Federation ??? On the rest I wanted to cheat .... And no need for the Crimean ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 10 January 2018 21: 38
      +2
      “And where is the practical benefit for the citizens of the Russian Federation” And the practical benefit will come from Gazprom’s profit - the more its profit, the more taxes it will send to the budget, and from the budget the money will go to everyone and everything.
      1. BecmepH
        BecmepH 11 January 2018 11: 41
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        he will send more taxes to the budget, and money from the budget will go to everyone and everything.

        Yes? And where are the taxes that I pay, my children?
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 11 January 2018 19: 24
          +1
          For everything - pensions, salaries to state employees, government programs and much more, my 34 million over the past year, the same people work there. And last year’s budget is
      2. WarriorWolf
        WarriorWolf 13 January 2018 00: 41
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        the more taxes he will send to the budget, and from the budget the money will go to everyone and everything.

        All! I'm just sobbing! which gas and oil are in an increase ... but there is no improvement in the same pensioners !!!
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 14 January 2018 20: 14
          0
          Let's abandon the weapons program - every year 3 trillion rubles, we will give to 40 million pensioners.
    2. Foxmara
      Foxmara 11 January 2018 08: 13
      0
      Quote: Warrior Wolf
      But where is the practical benefit for the citizens of the Russian Federation ??? On the rest I wanted to cheat .... And no need for the Crimean ...

      But something does not happen in isolation. They raised the army — they didn’t let Syria collapse — Russia is respected in the BV — contracts for nuclear energy, for the military-industrial complex, for Russian Railways are all money, these are jobs. And our Crimea is a guarantee that there will be no US bases in Crimea, in turn, the security of you and me. How can it be seen on the contrary in Ukraine - the Foreign Ministry can make any kind of statements - no one listens to it at all.
      Everything in the complex.
      1. BecmepH
        BecmepH 11 January 2018 11: 49
        +2
        Quote: Foxmara
        Everything in the complex

        So then it is. But I do not agree with this
        Russia is respected in the BV
        These peoples respect (or rather fear) only power. Where did their respect go when in Syria our 300 fighters squeezed superior forces? Sdris-well! They "respect us" while we protect them and distribute humanitarian packages
        But the Vietnamese breasted defended our fighters.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. WarriorWolf
        WarriorWolf 15 January 2018 12: 15
        0
        This has passed, 30 years have passed, no more than in the last state, which was more powerful in potential. And what is the end? Orders were also there, respect and other, other, other ... A century and a half ago, in the year before last, these same BV sources in the Caucasus were driven like husky dogs, and how opponents gained more respect (Take an interest in the campaign of Colonel Koryagin) ... AND??? soldier
  21. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 10 January 2018 21: 06
    +4
    Isn't this the author who recently wrote imperishable, saying that "only Russia has oil and gas, and the rest smoke"? laughing
    The presentation style is already very similar, and the argument at Odnoklassniki’s level is “soon to your Omerike’s kerdyk and only because some third party delivered Russian gas there once”.
  22. Sling cutter
    Sling cutter 10 January 2018 21: 09
    +3
    Loess,
    Being determines consciousness.
    As for garbage, I have solved this problem since childhood. Here I bring up my own. Nm one of the three will never even throw a tram ticket past the ballot box, but I generally keep quiet about the behavior in the forest. hi
    1. BecmepH
      BecmepH 11 January 2018 11: 53
      +2
      Quote: Stroporez
      Loess,
      Being determines consciousness.
      As for garbage, I have solved this problem since childhood. Here I bring up my own. Nm one of the three will never even throw a tram ticket past the ballot box, but I generally keep quiet about the behavior in the forest. hi

      Same. My wife always keeps garbage bags in my car. On long trips we take garbage in the car to the nearest gas station.
  23. vorysgelo
    vorysgelo 10 January 2018 21: 12
    +8
    It's ridiculous! The liberals are trying to convince us that selling their homeland at a bargain price is also a success!
    There is nothing else to offer, so the comproders trade in what the earth gave birth to. Kuzbass was turned into Mars, central Russia - nickel was found, too, people can be driven away and poisoned all around. People in cities, I don’t even speak about villages and villages, they sit without gas, they drive electricity to China at exorbitant prices. The people are silent ...
  24. SOF
    SOF 10 January 2018 21: 48
    +2
    Quote: Vadim237
    And also we trade: reactors, satellites, rocket engines, military equipment, construction equipment, chemical components, alloys: high-quality, high-quality and extra-high-quality, titanium billets, aviation materials, medical preparations, isotopes, nuclear fuel - fuel elements, software, even checkpoint details - for "Formula One" and much more.

    This is a secret, are you ... Don’t tell anyone ... You can’t talk about this on the eve of the elections !!! Everything is bad with us. How is it about the polymers next ... forgot ...
    good
  25. Ivan58
    Ivan58 10 January 2018 21: 51
    +4
    And what's the point? The profit will go to the salaries of Gazprom tops, and what remains will be invested in the American economy.
  26. Simon
    Simon 10 January 2018 22: 01
    +2
    How much America did not impose its shale gas on Europe, but how the cold came, Europe turned to Russia with outstretched hands - Give gas! Coldly crying
  27. Awak
    Awak 10 January 2018 22: 52
    +2
    I am a citizen of Russia. What am I doing? Have you ever, ever, connected gas to the territory of the Russian Federation? Bribes ...
    1. Uralean
      Uralean 10 January 2018 23: 27
      +1
      Are you one citizen of Russia? no others? But how did other millions of citizens connect gas ... Although I must admit that local gas structures created a lot of problems here .. But Gazprom is the extraction and transportation of gas mainly abroad and the extraction of currency for the country .. And domestic gas consumption goes through third, fourth hands, through heaps of intermediaries with abuses similar to Gazprom ... Well, this is so in everything, and in the World, and in the construction of houses and apartments, and large supermarkets sell everything as they want .. But this is another song)) )
  28. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 11 January 2018 07: 05
    0
    "Victory" -yes .... that is, gas for the Russians will now be stable .... "do not go up"? wink
  29. zzdimk
    zzdimk 11 January 2018 08: 12
    +1
    "Complete debacle" is a speech mistake. Pleonasm. I read the article. Tired of cheering patriots, graphomania smells of them.
  30. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 11 January 2018 10: 24
    +3
    The gas situation in Europe will continue to change in the direction of increasing supplies from Russia. European gas reserves are getting smaller. In ten or a little more years, they will start transferring production to reserve mode. In Europe, only Russia can provide long-term gas demand by volume, at an adequate price. Stripes really want to participate in the European gas market as a gasket, making a profit without the cost of production, as usual. This situation entails risks for Russia. Europeans, having depleted and made up territory under themselves, will increasingly dream of dividing our territory and its reserves “in fairness”. Therefore, our armed forces must be even stronger in order to maintain parity with all this hungry NATO gang.
  31. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 11 January 2018 11: 00
    0
    It turns out that modern wars are unleashed due to economic interests and political ambitions, but the main thing is profit ... in principle, nothing has changed since ancient and medieval centuries .....
  32. Tolik_74
    Tolik_74 11 January 2018 12: 05
    0
    Gazprom absorbs gas market in Europe and slaps US
    It’s time not to hand out the slamming ass.
  33. vasya.pupkin
    vasya.pupkin 11 January 2018 13: 41
    +2
    "AND EVEN IN THE AREA OF BALLET WE ARE BEFORE THE PLANET OF ALL ,,," Vladimir Semenich V.
  34. kondrat13
    kondrat13 12 January 2018 03: 08
    0
    The author rejoices at the increase in the share of our gas in the European market, forgetting that Europe is increasing the production of green electricity at hellish pace. Scotland, Denmark - almost all of the electricity comes from renewable sources, TPPs are currently kept only to maintain peak loads. They will suck our gas bosom for another 10 years, and then the gas will be needed only for chemistry.
    1. Alex-a832
      Alex-a832 12 January 2018 08: 53
      +2
      Green energy is not as cost-effective as they would like. Clean and energy-efficient sources so far only on gas and nuclear fuel. In ten years they will start gas and transport in large quantities to refuel. PR of green energy in Europe is costly; no real alternative to tradition has yet been invented.
  35. Dr_engie
    Dr_engie 12 January 2018 19: 01
    +1
    Yeah, you read directly and you feel how prices in stores are falling, queues in kindergarten are being reduced and life is getting better, yes.
  36. ugrums1961
    ugrums1961 13 January 2018 17: 32
    0
    I would beware of such bright prospects for Gazprom to paint, life is unstable, let's wait a little longer. And then somehow it might be bad to get, and this will be another article.