China has imposed restrictions on trade with the DPRK

112
China within the framework of the implementation of the resolution 2397 announced the complete cessation of the export of iron, steel, industrial equipment, and also limited the supply of crude oil and petroleum products and imposed a ban on the import of certain types of grain and agricultural products from the DPRK, the ministry of commerce said.

China has imposed restrictions on trade with the DPRK




The UN Security Council 23 last December adopted a new resolution to put pressure on North Korea in response to its testing of the Hwason-15 intercontinental ballistic missile. The document introduces new restrictions on the supply of crude oil and refined products, and also requires all countries to send North Korean labor migrants within 24 months. The resolution also provides for other restrictions relating to the import into the DPRK of industrial equipment, heavy equipment and vehicles, as well as the procurement of major North Korean export goods.

The Ministry of Commerce of China on Friday issued a decree on the implementation of the provisions of the resolution, which comes into force on January 6.

Since 1 in October last year, Chinese authorities have restricted the supply of petroleum products to the DPRK, and also introduced a total ban on textile imports from the DPRK from 11 December. In addition, the Ministry of Commerce issued a prescription until the end of 2017, to close all joint ventures with DPRK participation created in China, reports RIA News
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

112 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    5 January 2018 19: 44
    This is not without reason, something bad is planned, if China is so tough with the DPRK, something will happen next ..?
    1. +4
      5 January 2018 19: 47
      something will come next ..?


      There will be nothing, they just measure their pussy. And the DPRK will find both iron and ore at home.
      And when it gets and completes, everything will be absolutely nothing. Because everyone understands what this is fraught with ... ...... although I may be too optimistic .....

      Well, of course, for half a year this whole mess looks dumb. request
      1. +4
        5 January 2018 21: 09
        Quote: DEZINTO
        There will be nothing

        China will not supply iron?
        North Korea is rich in magnesite, zinc, and tungsten iron. Magnesite deposits are estimated at 6 billion tons - the second place in the world, mining is carried out by joint ventures I think to guess who these joint is not necessary,
        1. +15
          5 January 2018 21: 20
          Quote: Vadivak
          North Korea is rich in magnesite, zinc, and tungsten iron. Magnesite deposits are estimated at 6 billion tons - the second largest in the world.

          We can see this by the standard of living of the average S. Korean.
          wink
          1. +12
            5 January 2018 23: 56
            Quote: karish
            We can see this by the standard of living of the average S. Korean.

            If your friends didn’t strangle them with sanctions, they would live no worse than others. Despite the fact that they, as extortioners, to you, the usurers are always offended, they don’t get anything for free.
            1. +2
              6 January 2018 08: 30
              Quote: Pirogov
              If your friends they were not strangled by sanctions. would live no worse than others

              I do not know how Ukraine wink but Russia voted (in the Soviet Union) for sanctions.
              Although you are right in some respects, we have friendly relations with Russia - unlike you.
              Quote: Pirogov
              Despite the fact that they, as extortioners, to you, the usurers always forever offended, do not get anything for free

              I understand the citizen with the Ukrainian flag and his wishes - you will not, unlike S. Korea, have a freebie laughing
              On April 18, the State Duma ratified an agreement between the Russian Federation and North Korea on the settlement of loan debt: 10 billion dollars forgiven debt[b] [/ b], and another 1 billion will go to joint projects.
          2. +5
            6 January 2018 08: 12
            You would have looked into your refrigerator, and not rummaged around strangers.
          3. 0
            6 January 2018 09: 21
            And what level is really lower than in Ukraine

            .
        2. 0
          5 January 2018 23: 32
          I think the Chinese people played in public, that is, for the world community)))) and, first of all, for the hawks of trump.
          1. 0
            6 January 2018 01: 14
            Quote: Kent0001
            I think the Chinese people played in public, that is, for the world community)))) and, first of all, for the hawks of trump.

            hi
            That's it. China is quietly preparing for a possible war and the hype is useless to him. There is plenty of money in the zagashnik, so the trade break with the DPRK will not affect the fraud.
    2. +14
      5 January 2018 19: 54
      Then everything will be fine. In the sun-like, everything in the family was miracle workers. Dad won at the Tedongan factory turning water into beer by willpower. Grandfather, by an effort of thought, caused pregnancy in Korean women and raised to his feet the grandmother Pak, paralyzed for 40 years. Now let him turn the sun-like one by the force of thought into water.
      1. +12
        5 January 2018 20: 19
        sunlike
        the world is very simple. If you are against North Korea, it means for the USA ...
        1. +11
          5 January 2018 20: 27
          Quote: Gardamir
          sunlike
          the world is very simple. If you are against North Korea, it means for the USA ...

          Is it possible for the UK? I have all the equipment in South Korea.
          1. +10
            5 January 2018 20: 28
            Is it possible for the UK?
            You only for Palestine.
          2. +6
            5 January 2018 20: 31
            Quote: Aaron Zawi
            Quote: Gardamir
            sunlike
            the world is very simple. If you are against North Korea, it means for the USA ...

            Is it possible for the UK? I have all the equipment in South Korea.

            Hi Aron!
          3. +4
            5 January 2018 20: 45
            all equipment is South Korean
            Yes, we are relatives. Also Samsung and Hyundai. But it's about something else. If the mess at the neighbors begins, then it can fly to us .. Therefore, it is better to support the neighbors.
          4. +4
            5 January 2018 21: 54
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            If you are against North Korea, it means for the USA ...
            Is it possible for the UK? I have all the equipment in South Korea.


            But what, its Israeli technology is not? What do you think "the most talented"?
            1. +3
              5 January 2018 23: 13
              Quote: Alber

              But what, its Israeli technology is not? What do you think "the most talented"?

              We don’t even have our own oil and what to do?
              1. +6
                6 January 2018 00: 06
                Quote: Aron Zaavi
                We don’t even have our own oil and what to do?

                file a lawsuit against Moses and Yahweh with international arbitration for damages and lost profits ...
        2. +7
          5 January 2018 20: 35
          I’ll tell you a terrible secret: the world is much more complicated. This is your personal perception of the world arranged very primitively (crossed out) simply. Do you understand the difference? )))
          1. +9
            5 January 2018 20: 54
            Do you understand the difference?
            No! The Kremlin say that omega is to blame for all the troubles in our country. Here on the site wherever Americans are remembered, everywhere they hint that they are bad people. Hence the logical conclusion. Enemies Omeriki are our friends. Plus, the United States destroyed two-thirds of the Korean population in the 50s war. So who is inadequate for Eun or Trump?
            1. +7
              5 January 2018 20: 59
              Quote: Gardamir
              So who is inadequate for Eun or Trump?
              For me, both. But you can choose manure varieties, if you like))
              1. +7
                5 January 2018 21: 11
                varieties of manure
                In the form of humor for a future dream. My childhood passed in the countryside, so I understand the grades thereof.) Chicken caustic. Pork and caustic and most smelly. Cow is tolerant, but perhaps not for the urban nose. And the townspeople who keep the horses will say that the horse is tolerant. wink
            2. 0
              6 January 2018 20: 26
              For the entire time of the Korean mess, with the "blessing" of the military-political bastards, ALL parties to the conflict suffered losses of less than 3 million, including civilians, who died from illnesses, wounds, etc.
              You outdid the cursed liberals who estimate the victims of the Komunyak genocide at tens of millions.
              Quote: Gardamir
              Plus, the United States destroyed two-thirds of the Korean population in the 50s war.

              Plus, the United States destroyed two-thirds of the Korean population in the 50s war.
              1. 0
                6 January 2018 21: 18
                Do you question the number of victims of the Trotskyist red terror in Russia or what?
                The United States is in Korea and it was necessary. Before that, the British starved India so that China would die of opium, the American Indians still remember, and slavery.
          2. +5
            5 January 2018 22: 36
            30.09.2016/7/14. Jerusalem Post. "Intel made its debut on Tuesday with the XNUMXth generation of its XNUMX nanometer processor chips, which will be incorporated into millions of laptops, tablets, desktops and other technical products and were developed at the company's research center in Haifa." The Israeli team did it again " "said Ran Senderowitz, head of research and development at Intel Israel. I think this allows us to be proud of Israeli technology," he added. Have a good rest ...
      2. +4
        5 January 2018 20: 38
        You can boost the economy of any country. Even without oil and minerals. Just need to catch the liberals on time
        1. 0
          6 January 2018 22: 23
          Quote: Dormidont
          You can boost the economy of any country. Even without oil and minerals. Just need to catch the liberals on time

          Do not catch, but shoot ...
      3. +8
        5 January 2018 20: 59
        The trade turnover between China and the United States is more than $ 300 billion. The Chinese do not want to step on their own eggs.
        1. +1
          5 January 2018 23: 42
          And they will not come. The United States is a lot addicted to China as a needle addict. And in any scenario, immediately breaking trade ties is the United States comes around very sour. The Chinese know what they are doing.
          1. +2
            6 January 2018 00: 35
            What does this mean for them - the United States will take all its production to its territory, and the Chinese will take their 1350 billion from the US economy - but such an exchange will not be in favor of China.
    3. +12
      5 January 2018 20: 02
      You never know who will begin to sell the same Chinese in the DPRK. South Ossetia and Abkhazia trade with LDNR and do not report to anyone what goods. And in the Novorossiysk pot, Americans load coal from the Donbass and sell it to Ukraine as American. So what? wassat
      1. +5
        5 January 2018 20: 29
        Quote: siberalt
        You never know who will begin to sell the same Chinese in the DPRK. South Ossetia and Abkhazia trade with LDNR and do not report to anyone what goods. And in the Novorossiysk pot, Americans load coal from the Donbass and sell it to Ukraine as American. So what? wassat

        By the way, the other day the Ukrainian border boat detained a cargo ship of Abkhazia with a cargo of cigarettes, headed, according to the crew, to Bulgaria. What do you think will happen to the crew, cargo and ship of a completely pro-Russian unrecognized state in Ukraine? I am waiting for your reply and answer other forum users. The options can be very different - from picking up to being awarded with the highest orders of Ukraine. I look forward to your options. Consider this a test by the cunning Armenian! wassat
        1. +3
          5 January 2018 20: 34
          Next time, such a boat will not even have time to give a distress signal.
          1. +3
            5 January 2018 20: 43

            That's what ukrovermaht should expect at the slightest approach to any ship !! am Indulge scum indiscriminately, and survivors - hang on the yards good
            1. +3
              5 January 2018 20: 47
              They don’t have a job ..... not all right, of course. And the planes as targets are just .... what were they counting on?
              Even if by some miracle they had sailed to the side of the ship, and began to climb, and even if a couple of them did go. The boats climbed onto the deck ...... during such a shootout? well, really! what did they expect. They were hatched in a dash-would immediately!

              "Deceit and courage" chip and Dale some .... request laughing
              1. +5
                5 January 2018 20: 50
                Intelligence failed, apparently it was a group that was not part of the global pirate structure with its informants in Egyptian and other times. There has long been talk that pirates "know too much." Or maybe it was a special provocation - according to the declaration on board something expensive, there was no protection, and after going out to sea "quietly" the fighters and weapons, etc. got out of the containers. good
                1. +4
                  5 January 2018 20: 57
                  Or maybe it was a special provocation - on the declaration on board something expensive,


                  mm ... well, yes, and this can be .... but they see themselves exactly like complete Somalis, ..... a shot from the ar-15 can be heard for five hundred meters, but no damn he decided to "ram" the container ship his boat .... amaze such order bearers of the Darwin Prize !.)) lol
            2. +1
              5 January 2018 23: 12
              Quote: Mih1974
              Indulge scum indiscriminately, and survivors - hang on the yards


              1740 boxes of cigarettes. By the way, Priluki took him (so ridiculed by VO and 2 Gyurza). 3 days worth. There are lawyers, all cases.
              1. +7
                5 January 2018 23: 25
                Quote: Antares
                By the way, Priluki took him (so ridiculed by VO and 2 Gyurza). 3 days worth. There are lawyers, everything

                Of course, nobody will drown you and hang you, but dill do not be surprised when your boat is moored and there is a reason, there will be lawyers, all cases and priluki will not help, and at least as many as four gyurzes. So it's not a dill brother.
      2. +1
        5 January 2018 21: 37
        siberalt
        You never know who will begin to sell the same Chinese in the DPRK. South Ossetia and Abkhazia trade with LDNR and do not report to anyone what goods.

        I say, soon it will be possible from Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transdniestria, LPR, LPR, DPR to create a new CMEA or ATS ....
    4. +3
      5 January 2018 21: 28
      Quote: No pasaran
      This is not without reason, something bad is planned, if China is so tough with the DPRK, something will happen next ..?

      And someone here from the patriots cheated that the PRC would not abandon its “brothers” ...
      Meanwhile, yet
      Since October 1 of last year, the Chinese authorities limited the supply of oil products to the DPRK, and also imposed a complete ban on the import of textiles from the DPRK from December 11. In addition, the Ministry of Commerce issued an order before the end of the 2017 year to close all joint ventures created in China with the participation of the DPRK

      And when I wrote about the 150-thousandth PLA group at the borders of the DPRK, everyone laughed hysterically, gee ...
    5. +1
      6 January 2018 00: 30
      One hell how they supplied all this - with smuggling through Hong Kong, they will continue to supply it.
      1. 0
        6 January 2018 01: 18
        Quote: Vadim237
        One hell how they supplied all this - with smuggling through Hong Kong, they will continue to supply it.

        And who will risk the courts and freedom, which captain?
        1. 0
          6 January 2018 21: 09
          For grandmas everyone will take a chance.
  2. +5
    5 January 2018 19: 48
    wow ((((((from what such a hu .... dog who walked the Chinese in front of the mattresses! ???? ...... or, as they say, they don’t want to lose face before the world community? .... and continue trading through third countries, such as the mumbuct
    1. 0
      5 January 2018 19: 54
      After all, they received rocket technology from Ukraine, or maybe from no one else. We will not know about this.
      1. +5
        5 January 2018 20: 06
        banderlogs for the hryvnia in his pants nass ... look ... well, do not sell anything, and somehow .... the way of selling documentation was traced to the final buyer .... the martras confirmed this yourself, just shut up quickly
    2. +7
      5 January 2018 20: 04
      The United States has nothing to do with it. They are tired of inadequate near the borders.
      This is not the first time that China has supported a resolution against the DPRK, nor has Russia.
      1. +8
        5 January 2018 20: 08
        Quote: Tiras
        The United States has nothing to do with it. They are tired of inadequate near the borders.

        Whose borders? laughing Do China and Russia have borders? Mexicans with tequila are also tired of me, but I'm not saying that they need to be destroyed. What did the USA forget about our borders, huh?
        1. +5
          5 January 2018 20: 33
          Quote: vovanpain
          Quote: Tiras
          The United States has nothing to do with it. They are tired of inadequate near the borders.

          Whose borders? laughing Do China and Russia have borders? Mexicans with tequila are also tired of me, but I'm not saying that they need to be destroyed. What did the USA forget about our borders, huh?

          Mexicans do not seem to promise to wipe Russia off the world map every week and give you tryndets, backing up their words with rocket firing and nuclear explosions. laughing
          1. +5
            5 January 2018 20: 41
            Quote: katana
            Mexicans do not seem to promise to erase Russia from the world map every week

            And rightly so, Russia does not climb to the Mexican border and does not promise to erase a foreign country with the population at the UN laughing although it can dust any country. wink Another bunch Razmik. More fire! wink
          2. +7
            5 January 2018 23: 26
            they will fill you up with drugs ...... and you’re constantly under it
        2. +8
          5 January 2018 20: 42
          Do not make a “wave” ahead of time, Lord!
          Not always apparent reality is reality.
          China adopted the resolution of the Security Council ..... This does not interfere with the supply of the same oil products and iron to the DPRK through a third country ......
          Belarus supplied shrimps and lobsters to Russia, and nothing ... wink laughing
          1. +6
            5 January 2018 20: 45
            Quote: Penalty
            Not always apparent reality is reality.
            China adopted the resolution of the Security Council .....This does not prevent the supply of the same oil products and iron to the DPRK through a third country....

            The decision of the UN Security Council is binding on all countries request

            Quote: Penalty
            Belarus supplied shrimps and lobsters to Russia, and nothing

            A shrimp in Russia forbade to deliver Sov. Bez or Putin?
            1. +4
              5 January 2018 20: 56
              Quote: karish
              The decision of the UN Security Council is binding on all countries

              Alexander, well, I didn’t expect this from you.
              Resolution No. 497 of December 17 1981 of the year
              Security Council
              Having considered the letter from the Permanent Representative of the Syrian Arab Republic of 14 of December 1981 of the year contained in document S / 14791,
              Reaffirming that the acquisition of territory by force is unacceptable in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, the principles of international law and relevant Security Council resolutions, decides that the decision of Israel to establish its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights is invalid and does not have international legal strength;
              Demands that Israel, the occupying Power, annul its decision immediately;
              Declares that all the provisions of the Geneva Convention for the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of August 12, 1949 continue to apply to Syrian territory occupied by Israel since June 1967;
              requests the Secretary-General to submit to the Security Council a report on the implementation of this resolution within two weeks and decides that if Israel does not comply with it, the Council will convene urgently, and no later than January 5, 1982, in order to consider the adoption of appropriate measures in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations .
              Adopted unanimously at the 2319 meeting.
              - UN official website
              Sanya in the yard 2018, Israel and now there. feel
              Quote: karish
              A shrimp in Russia forbade to deliver Sov. Bez or Putin?

              And the Security Council imposed sanctions on Russia or Obama. drinks hi
              1. +4
                5 January 2018 21: 06
                Quote: vovanpain
                Alexander, well, I didn’t expect this from you.

                Hi Volodya.
                Everything is right - we, like S. Korea - are putting on the resolution.
                But note - not a single country (in accordance with the decision of the Soviet Security Council) does not recognize the Golan as ours.
                We are of course on the drum - but the resolution is being implemented.
                By the way, pay attention - a resolution on the jurisdiction of the Golan, and not on the return thereof.
                Quote: vovanpain
                And the Security Council imposed sanctions on Russia or Obama.

                Here I am about that.
                Sanctions were imposed on Russia by Putin (more precisely, counter-sanctions) --- therefore, shrimp from Belarus, and Parmesan from Kazakhstan. request
                1. +3
                  5 January 2018 21: 25
                  Quote: karish
                  But note - not a single country (in accordance with the decision of the Soviet Security Council) does not recognize the Golan as ours.

                  Yes, Sasha, well, like Crimea, Kimka incidentally recognized Crimea as Russian. Yes
                  Quote: karish
                  Sanctions were imposed on Russia by Putin (more precisely, counter-sanctions) --- therefore, shrimp from Belarus, and Parmesan from Kazakhstan.

                  Well, we won’t beat us anyway, neither we nor Europe will be stronger, only such a striped one over the ocean, but Siemens’s turbines will be one hell in the Crimea, Siemens will deliver three more turbines to Tatarstan, but all these sanctions and counter-sanctions are just changes in logistics and prices .Well again Happy New Year Friend. drinks hi
                  1. +1
                    5 January 2018 21: 35
                    Quote: vovanpain
                    Taki Sasha yes, well, like Crimea, Kimka incidentally recognized Crimea as Russian

                    Well, I basically have nothing against it.
                    Quote: vovanpain
                    Well, we will not be beaten harder anyway neither we nor Europe,

                    Volodya, the sanctions of Europe and the USA concerned only the financial sector, advanced equipment, some individuals and parts of the defense sector.
                    Everything else (I'm talking about food and products of the EU and the USA) is anti-sanctions.
                    Quote: vovanpain
                    but Siemens turbines one hell in Crimea

                    Volodya, I’m a little bit in the subject (you know) and shopping mall 2, exactly the same turbines are located 50 m from my office - I will assume that in a fairly short term these power plant turbines will encounter some problems in terms of maintenance and spare parts exclusively Siemens.
                    I'm not talking about image loss.
                    Quote: vovanpain
                    Well, all these sanctions and counter-sanctions are simply changes in logistics and prices

                    Of course, what do you think, who pays for the difference in logistics and price?
                    Oh well.
                    And of course Happy New Year.!
              2. +3
                5 January 2018 21: 08
                Israel’s failure to comply with the requirements of the resolution is also facilitated by the fact that the decision of the UN Security Council is only advisory in nature, because it was made with reference to Chapter VI of the UN Charter “Peaceful Settlement of Disputes”


                All resolutions regarding Israel and the disputed territories of Israel and Syria are all advisory.

                And as far as I know, just about the DPRK. It is all the more strange to see a country that votes for sanctions and violates itself.
      2. +7
        5 January 2018 20: 10
        let me ask: whose borders ???? how are you with geography? ....
        Quote: Tiras
        They are tired of inadequate

        inadequate is a pack of martras-striped ..... what do they generally do in this region ....?
        1. +2
          5 January 2018 21: 13
          Quote: assa67
          let me ask: whose borders ???? how are you with geography? ....


          Russia and China. AND US allies



          Quote: assa67
          inadequate is a pack of martras-striped ..... what do they generally do in this region ....?


          The same as Russia in Syria - geopolitical interests. Russia in Syria is not to fight terrorism and not to help the Syrians and Assad, but for its own interests.

          And near the DPRK are allies of the United States, countries that receive US military support and who hope for US help, since they have a crazy man with a nuclear bomb sitting near their borders and behaving inappropriately, so even Russia and China also impose sanctions against him.
      3. 0
        5 January 2018 20: 23
        inadequate
        They will come to rape your wife, but if you look askance at the rapist you will be called inadequate and sanctions will be imposed on you. Is it clear now?
        1. +2
          5 January 2018 21: 13
          Quote: Gardamir
          They will come to rape your wife, but if you look askance at the rapist you will be called inadequate and sanctions will be imposed on you. Is it clear now?


          So Russia and China have also imposed sanctions? wassat
      4. +3
        5 January 2018 20: 23
        Quote: Tiras
        Sha has nothing to do with it. They are tired of inadequate near the borders.

        I would like to know what is the inadequacy of the leaders of the DPRK .. They attacked someone? Destroyed Iraq, Yugoslavia, Syria? Sponsoring terrorists around the world? .. what else?
        1. +3
          5 January 2018 21: 15
          Quote: dvina71
          I would like to know what is the inadequacy of the leaders of the DPRK .. They attacked someone? Destroyed Iraq, Yugoslavia, Syria? Sponsoring terrorists around the world? .. what else?


          And you ask the president of your country, who recently once again supported sanctions against the DPRK.
          Apparently, from the fact that there is a white and fluffy Eun lol
      5. 0
        5 January 2018 20: 42
        Inadequate Americans. More inadequate can not be found on the whole.
        World gopniks fire regularly in every way, but is the Korean inadequate? This is at what degree can this be bent?
  3. +3
    5 January 2018 19: 49
    Negative news! China caved in under the usa! The mind is not enough to understand that the Yankees are playing against China, crushing the North Koreans! China will still regret over time that it went on about the Yankees!
    1. +2
      5 January 2018 20: 05
      This is far from the first sanctions against the DPRK adopted by the UN Security Council with the support of Russia and China.
    2. +4
      5 January 2018 20: 10
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Negative news! China caved in under the usa!

      Why under the USA?
      Maybe under Russia, Russia also voted for the resolution wink
      Quote: Herkulesich
      The mind is not enough to understand that the Yankees are playing against China, crushing the North Koreans!

      This is a turn, and how do they play against China?

      Quote: Herkulesich
      China will still regret over time that it went on about the Yankees!

      But what about Russia?
      She kind of like that too
      Russia fully complies with the sanctions regime against North Korea. This was stated by RIA Novosti in the press service of the Russian Foreign Ministry
      1. 0
        5 January 2018 20: 39
        Maybe under Russia, Russia also voted for the resolution

        I didn’t vote. And if about .... gre ... Bunskoye pr-in, so I didn’t foot there.
      2. 0
        5 January 2018 22: 58
        Blah blah blah. Are you sure a Jew? Do not carry the blizzard, we are talking about China.
  4. +7
    5 January 2018 19: 50
    I don’t understand why everybody here stubbornly asserts that China will be a mountain behind the DPRK? Only a continuous headache for them. I think China is not averse to overthrowing this regime with Soncelik Kim, and taking the DPRK to a direct protectorate. And China will benefit from this and people will live worse, I think they won’t do this, but most likely they will benefit
    1. +3
      5 January 2018 20: 25
      I think China is not averse to overthrowing this regime with Soncelik Kim, and taking the DPRK to a direct protectorate.
      It would be good for Russia to throw off the sunflower Powder and take LDNR under a direct protectorate, and the rest too.
      1. +3
        5 January 2018 23: 20
        Quote: Gardamir
        It would be good for Russia to throw off the sunflower Powder and take LDNR under a direct protectorate, and the rest too.

        respected Ukrainian partner and the best choice of the Ukrainian people ??? Well, you are my friend, just for the Maidan laughing and against the party ....
    2. 0
      5 January 2018 23: 55
      That's it spirit... I doubt it. If Eun's comrades fall, then the North Korean regime will collapse. The process of mutual visits across the border will begin (there are many relatives on both sides). Well, then the scenario worked out on the example of Germany and the GDR. As a result, we get a united Korea, which in a very short time will become the new eastern economic giant (South Korea is already economically and technologically powerful). I confess that China is interested in the appearance of such a player on the Korean peninsula. A united Korea may move China, especially considering that it is completely pro-American. But the United States would be glad to see such a counterbalance to China on the Chinese border.
  5. +7
    5 January 2018 19: 51
    They would deal with the American missile defense at the same time.
  6. +6
    5 January 2018 19: 54
    Publicly, anything can be banned, but who can and who will control the Sino-Korean border? As everyone drove, they will carry so.
    1. +2
      5 January 2018 19: 58
      If the pipes in the earth, then yes, and so the satellites see everything, but China has started something.
      1. +3
        5 January 2018 20: 53
        Victor, salute!
        Sanctions, sanctions, and Spanish jamon did not go off the shelves in Russia.
        So .... there would be a desire .... But no one will leave the DPRK .... since if we turn our back on him, Eun will press the "Red Button" out of hopelessness ..
        1. +1
          5 January 2018 21: 00
          Quote: Solomon Kane
          And no one will leave the DPRK .... since if we turn our back on him, Eun from hopelessness will press the "Red Button".

          good
          And tryndets America.
          Maybe all the same it is worth turning away? wink
          Or are you from the secret liberals - the defenders of America?
          1. +3
            5 January 2018 21: 04
            I would be in your place concerned about the situation in Iran ......
            1. +5
              5 January 2018 21: 23
              Quote: Solomon Kane
              I would be in your place concerned about the situation in Iran ......

              There will be an article about Iran - let’s take care laughing
        2. +2
          5 January 2018 21: 01
          Hi Kostya! hi Happy New Year! drinks
          So yes, only mostly produced in Rostov or Krasnodar.
          And sanctions are a very interesting thing, someone is not very bad at it.
          1. +3
            5 January 2018 21: 12
            Merry Christmas, Vit!
            See there what will happen next ..... God will not give out the pig will not gobble up ....
            1. +1
              5 January 2018 21: 27
              Kostya and you Merry Christmas!
              Yes, it doesn’t wait long, the main thing is that we would be ready for any development option.
    2. +2
      5 January 2018 19: 58
      anything can be banned, but who can and who will control the Sino-Korean border?

      Here you are to the point! I thought about that too. And who will actually and physically control? The border that has historically been used for such processes. pff yes, I beg you to stop the figs ..... banned, written on a piece of paper and put in a box ..... lol
      1. +3
        5 January 2018 20: 03
        They made the usual window dressing for the states "friendly" to China, as they say they washed their eyes.
  7. +1
    5 January 2018 20: 01
    China could not oppose itself to the UN Security Council and why, it honestly complied with and announced this openly!
    Fulfilled, it is probably not entirely appropriate for this situation. Sanctions were imposed on Iran, but Iran did not stop trading in oil, it just threw off the price. It has long been no secret that China was the main buyer of contraband
    1. 0
      5 January 2018 20: 14
      The EU and the US imposed sanctions on Iran on oil, and not the UN Security Council, so China was out of business, but Iran’s discounts brought down a big deal for itself, as a monopoly buyer
    2. +2
      5 January 2018 20: 30
      Quote: APASUS
      China could not oppose itself to the UN Security Council and why, it honestly complied with and announced this openly!


      China is a great power why it can not score on the Security Council and veto?
      1. 0
        5 January 2018 21: 26
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        China is a great power why it can not score on the Security Council and veto?

        What for? China will spit on any decision and swallow it all, but everyone will learn about it after the fact. After all, they swallowed direct copying and do not care about the "patent law" and then swallow it
    3. +2
      5 January 2018 20: 41
      Quote: APASUS
      China could not oppose itself to the UN Security Council and why, it honestly complied with and announced this openly!
      Fulfilled, it is probably not entirely appropriate for this situation. Sanctions were imposed on Iran, but Iran did not stop trading in oil, it just threw off the price. It has long been no secret that China was the main buyer of contraband

      The UN Security Council did not impose a ban on the export of Iranian oil, it was introduced on its own initiative by the United States and its allies. So whoever wanted to - bought Persian oil quite legally, only these sanctions have already brought Iran to grips - many are already aware of the unrest in Iran.
  8. +1
    5 January 2018 20: 07
    Something is not believed. Such a border, almost uncontrolled territory ... How will they control it? Or "gentlemen believe the word"?
    1. +8
      5 January 2018 20: 12
      As a rule, they control shipping.
    2. 0
      5 January 2018 20: 14
      The news has long been about the transfer of Chinese troops to the border with the DPRK. So they will control
    3. +2
      5 January 2018 20: 42
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Something is not believed. Such a border, almost uncontrolled territory ... How will they control it? Or "gentlemen believe the word"?

      Through satellites and will control.
  9. +4
    5 January 2018 20: 12
    No one has canceled contraband, and you won’t control the border, and no one will give it to anyone who knows what’s in the cars, tanks, trucks. And pipelines that do not exist in the documents are also likely to exist. So you can announce anything, but China is unlikely to quit Korea and satisfy their critical needs
  10. +4
    5 January 2018 20: 27
    You can’t give a damn about the UN resolution either, but we are not the United States. It is necessary to conduct intergovernmental policies more professionally before adopting resolutions.
  11. +1
    5 January 2018 20: 34
    But in vain! Let the Americans cling to the DPRK, and the Chinese would help the DPRK. I think it would be more useful. Americans are afraid of military conflict with powerful states. Including with China.
  12. +1
    5 January 2018 20: 35
    He entered demonstratively so that the general people would not bark. Check it out there.
  13. +1
    5 January 2018 20: 40
    Quote: Herkulesich
    Negative news! China caved in under the usa! The mind is not enough to understand that the Yankees are playing against China, crushing the North Koreans! China will still regret over time that it went on about the Yankees!

    I completely agree with you! No matter how sideways it cost. this is to china. Moreover, Russia would be in the worst case-neutrality!
  14. +2
    5 January 2018 20: 46
    The Chinese are strengthening North Korea’s controllability - as soon as the controllability necessary for China is achieved, all supplies will resume. Yes
    1. 0
      5 January 2018 21: 45
      Quote: flicker
      The Chinese are strengthening North Korea’s controllability - as soon as the controllability necessary for China is achieved, all supplies will resume. Yes

      The PRC controls the DPRK, much like the USSR controlled the FRY, gee ... laughing
  15. 0
    5 January 2018 20: 50
    Opa - a holy place - does not happen empty. We have nothing to fear or lose - only profit.
  16. +1
    5 January 2018 21: 37
    China has imposed restrictions on trade with the DPRK
    I hope China is joking. Old chinese game.
  17. +1
    5 January 2018 21: 56
    It is quite expected. China will not risk the welfare of its population for the DPRK, and the United States is their main trading partner, China is not the same as in the 50s and never will be. And they just recently healed the norms, why do they need problems, and Eun also fed them already.
    1. +1
      5 January 2018 22: 01
      DPRK is also dear to the PRC now, as it once was to us in the 99 march of FRY .... hi
  18. +3
    5 January 2018 23: 09
    Quote: DEZINTO
    And the DPRK will find both iron and ore at home.

    If you carefully read the resolution, then this is not about delivery in the DPRK iron ore, magnesite, agricultural products, and supplies FROM DPRK
    Moreover, the sanctions do not apply to spare parts for civil aviation of the DPRK. Russia can supply these parts. 4 million barrels of oil per year are allowed (this is 525 tons). Plus, the amount of oil necessary for the life of the population is not limited
    But the fact that the Chinese began to tighten sanctions says a lot

    Quote: Mih1974

    That's what ukrovermaht should expect at the slightest approach to any ship !! am Indulge scum indiscriminately, and survivors - hang on the yards good

    That is, you propose to go down not even to their level, but even lower? A great way to maintain a country's image is to start piracy.

    Quote: Alexander 3
    After all, they received rocket technology from Ukraine, or maybe from no one else. We will not know about this.

    Well, why do not we know. It is known that at one time the FSB prevented the relocation of a group of employees of the GRTs im. Makeeva in the DPRK. Although the part was surely able to leave. rockets of the last 10 years are rockets. created on the basis of either Yuzhmashevsky developments or developments of design bureau Makeev. So where did they get the technology from - there is nothing top secret about it. North Korean missiles are not copies of these products (South Mashevsky and Makeevsky). These are our own developments, but created on the basis of those developments and technologies that went there.

    Quote: Herkulesich
    Negative news! China caved in under the usa! The mind is not enough to understand that the Yankees are playing against China, crushing the North Koreans! China will still regret over time that it went on about the Yankees!

    Well, of course. just did not support the North Korean regime - it means caved in under the United States. Or or. But do not think. that both Russia and China have made the right decision based on bоa larger array of information than ours, readers of VO ?? And this position is not "deflection", but thoughtful and balanced, based on the interests of Russia and China precisely ???

    Quote: Mavrikiy
    China has imposed restrictions on trade with the DPRK
    I hope China is joking. Old chinese game.

    I'm afraid I'm not joking. And some still don’t want to believe that China could have done that. Invented various conspiracy theories about secret pipelines. There were no oil pipelines, and suddenly secret ones appeared. Do they have to go somewhere? And go?
  19. 0
    5 January 2018 23: 15
    Quote: karish
    Hi, Aaron.

    Hey. hi
  20. 0
    5 January 2018 23: 45
    Quote: Aaron Zawi
    Quote: Alber

    But what, its Israeli technology is not? What do you think "the most talented"?

    We don’t even have our own oil and what to do?

    yes, Moses drove and brought ... around all the oil - pour in and a lot of other things, but nothing here.
    1. 0
      6 January 2018 00: 48
      Maybe he was a Palestinian or a Persian?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"