Military Review

Liberal Briefing Guide

36
This manual is recommended for use in Russia in debates, responses to citizens, comments and just disputes in order to high-quality powder of the brain, exposing yourself to an unprecedented intellectual and trolling normal people.


Liberal Briefing Guide


It was rumored that they had a hand in this embassy both in the embassy of the main “partner” and laureates of state awards and grants from both the NATO countries and the Russian Federation (which cannot be because it cannot be) for law destructive activities in Russia.

Firstly, if you are an individual, do not forget to contact your opponent without address and categorically. There is nothing to indulge in any normal speech! No "Sergey, I think (or, God forbid, a reference to specifics) ..." Only "I know for sure ..."

2. No, no, yes and screw a little nonsense with the sauce "As you know ..." It is a little. If your opponent has swallowed without objection, gradually develop nonsense until your opponent is stunned.

3. Do not forget to show yourself to be an expert in economics, for example, by issuing a phrase from the vaults ... of the clerks ...: "Credit default swaps are used to hedge the derivative risks." What if they do not realize that this is the usual “Fenya” (thug language) of modern senior managers, graduates and fans of HSE, and does it mean that they want to “wear a sucker”? Do not give in to provocations such as the need to speak in a normal language in official communication in accordance with the law on the Russian language! The chairmen of the government and Sberbank are not amenable, and so are you.

4. In the dispute, look not for the truth, but for the slightest mistakes and inaccuracies of the other party. If you can not find, quickly think of something small yourself, inflate to the skies and irritate.

5. Cornered you? Then declare that criticize all much, but there is no one to solve the problem. And it does not matter that you (or anyone else, for whom you stand by the wall) earlier promised and deceived, and promised a wagon and a cart, but somehow forgot to report non-compliance. And it does not matter that all of a sudden someone paid a rather big coin just for fulfilling promises. And resourcefulness helps in gradually avoiding an uncomfortable question. Try to answer several questions at once, and you can “accidentally” forget about the inconvenient one.

6. The class argument “Horses at the crossing do not change!” Is still less likely to be used, but they will reasonably be asked: “What if the horses are captured by the enemies? And if, thanks to our “partners,” we have “ferries”, then “horses” are forever sacred and inviolable? Or maybe enough to dangle across the crossings, maybe remember that there is no ford in the fire and turn to face the enemies and accomplices?

7. Never be fooled by an opponent's offer to consider a situation in space and time! Otherwise, you can get a terrible discovery, for example, that Ivan the Terrible was the most humane ruler of his time, and the famine of the early 30-s in the USSR is comparable to the truly man-made famine in America blessed by us at the same time!

8. Actively introduce Halloween, Groundhog Day and other Catholic Christmas celebrations to the masses! Support the best representatives of the creative intelligentsia, of all kinds of silver, with their plays about the lower spins of Nureyev, it's not for nothing that the press secretary of Peskov has gotten into the play! Remember that a holy place is never empty and the absence of a state ideology, like an indistinct bleating about some braces, gives a great opportunity to cheat all that is good with your people and to magnify something alien and alien.

9. Never admit that the other side is right, not even in small things. In such cases, use the last arguments, almost according to Panikovsky: "You do not understand" and "And who are you?"

10. And most importantly, do not doubt these points, in your God's chosen people and that you are always right. Doubts, like self-criticism, are dangerous for a liberal and turn him into a reasonable person and even, scary to think, into a patriot.
Author:
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vend
    Vend 9 January 2018 12: 25
    12
    This is suitable not only for liberals, they often act in other camps. laughing
    1. dSK
      dSK 9 January 2018 19: 59
      +2
      Hello Anatoly!
      Quote: Wend
      so often
      и "free historians".
      1. Vend
        Vend 10 January 2018 09: 25
        0
        Quote: dsk
        Hello Anatoly!
        Quote: Wend
        so often
        и "free historians".

        Hello, I would even say grant historians
        1. Mih1974
          Mih1974 11 January 2018 01: 03
          +3
          Their name is Chrono-inhabitants negative
          You can google it hto and what should be done with them lol
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit 13 January 2018 17: 46
        0
        Quote: dsk
        and "free historians"

        Are there involuntary historians? Historians, this is a caste with diplomas and titles, and if some facts do not fit into the established historical concept, all the worse for the facts. Otherwise, you have to admit that the whole story is a set of myths written by the winners, which, by and large, it is.
  2. your1970
    your1970 9 January 2018 12: 37
    +7
    Some kind of slurred porridge .....
    Underdone / undersalt / peppered / nothing ..
  3. cannabis
    cannabis 9 January 2018 12: 42
    +6
    This article is probably about the Military Review website. That's exactly right.
  4. CONTROL
    CONTROL 9 January 2018 13: 05
    +7
    ... catechism of a political adventurer ....
    1. jjj
      jjj 9 January 2018 14: 22
      +2
      Really reminded. Nothing is said about wives here.
      1. CONTROL
        CONTROL 9 January 2018 15: 19
        +2
        Quote: jjj
        Really reminded. Nothing is said about wives here.

        And do not!
        Only the maximum extreme! Only hardcore!
  5. Siberian1965
    Siberian1965 9 January 2018 13: 37
    18
    ... catechism of a political adventurer .... Here, here. Compare: Credit Default Swaps Used to Hedge Derivative Risks
    I liked the article. I read and just got up before my eyes, different spitting zaggdaedaty our political SHOW. On all sides, but the liberals are just every first. And yet such an observation - liberals, which are pink and fat on one face, like piglets.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 9 January 2018 14: 39
      +5
      Quote: Siberian1965
      such an observation is liberals, which are pink and fat on one face, like piglets.

      Earlier - in the USSR - it was called: "like a peach"! with such a gentle cannon on the face ...
      ... Maybe short for "first secretary"?
      Here it comes from - everything - liberal - is growing! From excess calorie nutrition !!! Gorbachev - at first - (despite the "label" ...) the identity was a "peach"! before the deployment of "political upheavals" ...
      But Yeltsin-was simply "red-faced" from excessive consumption of strong ...
  6. Korax71
    Korax71 9 January 2018 14: 27
    +4
    Now everything is the same only for the urapatreotic user.
  7. turbris
    turbris 9 January 2018 14: 34
    +2
    This article is just about comments on the VO site, all exactly according to the instructions of many bloggers. Do not believe? Read comments with references to “facts”, “statistics” taken from the ceiling, distortion of obvious historical facts, criticism of the federal authorities in everything, from repairing entrances and completely ignoring the presence of regional and local authorities.
  8. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 9 January 2018 15: 49
    +1
    Bravo author!
  9. Yugra
    Yugra 9 January 2018 16: 53
    +1
    What is the briefing for the belolentnoy scum?
  10. BAI
    BAI 9 January 2018 17: 26
    +1
    Well this is from the series:
    - Venue: social networks, sites, blogs, news feeds, comments in video feeds, YouTube, justice and so on.
    - Comments should be with supporting pictures, links, videos, even if simply cut out of the general context.
    - Use cultural speech in conversations, be friendly and welcoming
    - Do not get fooled by provocations, do not respond with aggression to aggression
    - The attack on the post, video, commentary is carried out purposefully, in groups of 10-20 people, you will simply be defeated by facts
    - Force your opponent to use a mat and other obscene expressions by any actions
    - Constantly indicate to the opponent that he is behaving uncivilized
    - If the opponent crushed your lies with facts, make an emphasis on his grammatical errors, this will demoralize and shame the opponent, veiling the fact of your lies
    - Try to make a split between groups of opponents, for example, people call to stand up for the defense of Donetsk, and you write that you don’t make sense from Donetsk yourself, it’s not worth fighting
    - Do not use the words seizure of power, Bandera, militants, terrorists, extremists, Nazis, nationalists. Always say - the people of Ukraine
    - Do not write that we are for Europe, write that we are for united Ukraine
    - Do not use language differences. Southeast and Crimea writes "in Ukraine" - agree with them, do not make contention in this.
    - Try to write in Russian, Ukrainian speech immediately repels many.
    - Try to convince that they were deceived, or deceived
    - Try to convince that Russia only needs resources and labor from Ukraine
    - Try to convince that everything is bad in Russia, use pictures of the outbacks, old buildings, dumps, demotivators about old women, retirement, hungry children and other facts of human pity are ideal
    - Try to convince that nobody is going to them, that nobody is going to grab or demolish anything from them
    - To show to the maximum how Yanukovych and the PR deputies lived, to emphasize that this is all stolen people's money
    - To prove to them that Ukraine will be strong only together, individually to intimidate that Russia from the South-East and Crimea will make them their slaves or something bad
    - If the opponent shows you the successes and achievements of Russia, reproach the opponent for being subjected to Kremlin propaganda. To convince your opponent that you allegedly have relatives in Russia who are terrified of Russia's poverty and poverty
    - In the same way, in this vein, do the opposite, if the opponent shows you facts of poverty and devastation in Europe, the EU or the USA
    - Try to convince to the maximum that the Maidan is supported by the South-East and Crimea, they say you have friends there, relatives who are behind the Maidan.
    - If the opponent can prove to you that the National Bank is controlled by the United States, emphasize that this is done in all countries, for the convenience of the economy. Also emphasize that the US and the EU want to help Ukraine, and are very worried about it.
    1. Anyone
      Anyone 11 January 2018 13: 45
      0
      You forgot the very end of the quote statement:
      - Frequently distribute this text under the guise of an allegedly official instruction for Ukrainian Internet trolls for creating a hohlosrach ™ in forums.
  11. The Grubby
    The Grubby 9 January 2018 17: 34
    +2
    Public people who often have to speak to large audiences are somehow trained to conduct discussions and verbal battles with opponents. And the techniques they use are basically the same.
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 9 January 2018 18: 18
      -1
      It really is.
      If we look at this article, we can easily find references to both liberals and patriots. Well, of course, the author barely restrains himself from calls for hatred for the current government, which he places in the liberal-oligarchic places, of course.
      From what we conclude - the author is an agitator for Siskin’s presidential candidate, that is, also against everyone, but like “for the Communists”, poured into his head with the skillful lips of “historians” in the irrevocable images of Comrade. Stalin and the USSR.
      Such figures are even more dangerous than all liberals combined, because most liberals already know and do not believe them at least, and these are now creating a "new alternative to oligarchic power."
      That without options will lead the country to an even more deafening collapse than from the efforts of the liberals.
      1. My address
        9 January 2018 20: 27
        10
        Sergei!
        You are in something right. I really think the power in Russia is liberal. Yes, and Putin himself has repeatedly stated that he is a liberal.
        And you have a purely liberal and derogatory name of the name of one of the candidates, this is culture! Well, a cool expression: "... against all, but like" for the communists ... ", and the whole phrase, gives you a person who is mistaken in the rules of building phrases, or a supporter of expressions about" credit default swaps. "Yes and, in general, you do not cite arguments, you simply affirm. In any case, these are characteristics of a present-day intelligentsia liberal.
        But I, apparently to your regret, a simple engineer.
        And an old joke about Stalin:
        - Vityok, why do real military consider Stalin to be a commander, hard workers are a hard worker, and the majority of people are just a genius?
        - Therefore, Seryoga, that only any rubbish considers him rubbish!
        1. Mestny
          Mestny 9 January 2018 23: 03
          0
          Sorry, you probably misunderstood me, or I most likely did not express myself clearly enough.
          On the contrary, I respect Comrade Comrade with all possible respect. Stalin, and to my homeland of the USSR.
          However, it so happened that there is no longer a country or its great leader. Unfortunately, building the USSR will fail again.
          Therefore, I believe in the struggle for power at the moment it is inappropriate to use references to the USSR and its achievements.
          I consider it shameful to tell the voters that right now, by removing the liberal power, socialism can be built.
          This is not so, and the attempt to do so now will lead to even greater disasters than any liberal government.
          Maybe then, after N generations, the necessary conditions will again be formed to build a more just, socially oriented state.
          But, alas, this is not so far.
          1. Antianglosax
            Antianglosax 10 January 2018 09: 40
            +2
            Quote: Mestny
            However, it so happened that there is no longer a country or its great leader. Unfortunately, building the USSR will fail again.
            Therefore, I believe in the struggle for power at the moment it is inappropriate to use references to the USSR and its achievements.
            I consider it shameful to tell the voters that right now, by removing the liberal power, socialism can be built.
            This is not so, and the attempt to do so now will lead to even greater disasters than any liberal government.
            Maybe then, after N generations, the necessary conditions will again be formed to build a more just, socially oriented state.

            1. Why doesn’t it work? Has anyone already tried it? If you set yourself this goal - it will turn out, not an exact copy, of course, but something more flexible, based on the same principles.
            2. Having removed the liberal power, you cannot build right away, but you can at least start moving in this direction. But they were and will be the achievements of the USSR — why belittle and hush them up? What's so shameful?
            3. The conditions themselves will not work out - they must be added up, and for this you need to have a goal, faith, will and make an effort.
            Our garbage dump in power, which developed during the time of the labeled and the drunk, can and should be changed, dispersed and planted! To begin with, we need a left dictatorship, which will later be transformed into normal socialism according to the Stalinist type, with artels, private property and public resources, the scooping of which currently goes to enrich a handful of thieves from the government and their accomplices, oligarchs and, most vile, Western degenerates.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  12. Nemesis
    Nemesis 9 January 2018 19: 15
    +4
    And who is sitting in the Kremlin if people like Sobchak are not in prison yet under Article 280 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ?!
    1. The Grubby
      The Grubby 9 January 2018 19: 41
      +3
      Quote: Nemesis
      And who is sitting in the Kremlin, if people like Sobchak are not in prison yet?


      Kind dictator))
      1. Nemesis
        Nemesis 9 January 2018 21: 55
        +2
        Rather, it’s the same company of Boriski Yeltsin, to whom Medvedev erected a monument, and Putin set guard near him
  13. Romey
    Romey 9 January 2018 20: 11
    +5
    Quote: Mestny
    It really is.
    Well, of course, the author barely restrains himself from calls for hatred for the current government, which he places in the liberal-oligarchic places, of course.
    .

    And that there is no reason? Or is government policy not ultra-liberal? We left the WTO? Have you done deoffshorization? How's it going with first with innovation, and then with the digital economy? May decrees implemented? Is industrial production growing not only in Putin's training manual? The oligarchs returned stolen? No new privatization expected? Sberbank Gref started working in the Crimea? Red Tolik planted? The retirement age is not rising, as the sacred person herself stated in plain text? Is medicine available? Is education quality? Or maybe I live in some other country?
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 9 January 2018 23: 19
      -1
      Well, if a person writes, it means he has a reason.
      I am answering the questions:
      No. She was ultra-liberal in the 90s.
      It is likely that we will exit the WTO.
      I am familiar with the numbers of offshore companies in exactly the same volume as you, that is, from the press. Therefore, I do not know how many there really are, and how many have been eliminated.
      If we understand by the combination of "digital economy" the introduction of electronic means of processing and transmitting data - is going by leaps and bounds.
      May decrees are more likely executed than not. That is, not all, but for the most part.
      Putin’s training manual never held in his hands. And yes. is growing. the truth is not as fast as we would like.
      When they, the oligarchs, stole, unfortunately I wasn’t near, so I don’t know who and how much should be returned.
      Probably anticipated. Russia is a capitalist country.
      Sberbank Gref works for the interests of himself and Gref. As it should be under capitalism. Neither you nor me will give gifts and fulfill our desires, if this is not profitable.
      "Plant a Red Tolik" can only court. We have a legal state.
      Retirement age does not increase.
      Yes, medicine is available. True, the quality is different depending on the income of the patient. As it should be under capitalism.
      Education, as elsewhere in the capitalist world, is quality only for money.

      And yes, it feels like you really live in another country. It was as if they had slept all these 27 (twenty-seven) years, with horror they found another country around them, and immediately demand that everything be returned as it was.
      1. Romey
        Romey 10 January 2018 06: 33
        +1
        Brilliantly. Here is just one thing that’s worth it: Retirement age does not increase. Your adoring object a month ago has outlined a whole bunch of reasons why this will be done. And probably three months after his election by enthusiastic fans.
        1. gaura
          gaura 10 January 2018 11: 38
          0
          Hurray, to the barricades? Or for a whiskered "communist"?
  14. shinobi
    shinobi 9 January 2018 21: 34
    0
    I also recommend using the "Key phrases" manager Gigantyuk from the collection "Pagans" by Drugal S.
  15. shuravi
    shuravi 9 January 2018 22: 00
    +5
    Very often I meet such a cliche:
    - I myself was not in Afghanistan (Chechnya), but here my brother, matchmaker, godfather, son-in-law, (underline necessary) was there and he says (any bullshit can be carried on).
  16. Dzmicer
    Dzmicer 10 January 2018 11: 50
    0
    Still, an interesting work among the descendants of the red executioners with their hands to the elbow in Russian blood: to discredit the ideas of personal freedom of man and democracy. Only liberals can be called unless in quotation marks.
  17. Conductor
    Conductor 11 January 2018 01: 49
    +1
    Just a masterpiece, no matter how you bow, it fits everywhere.
  18. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 11 January 2018 18: 42
    +2
    Quote: Mestny
    Maybe then, after N generations, the necessary conditions will again be formed to build a more just, socially oriented state.

    Just when the last witnesses of socialist relations in our country will die? Then of course! It will be easy for everyone to prove that during socialism bloodied children crawled along the roads and evil communists crushed them with T-72 tanks.
    And what? Were there not such tanks then?
  19. Sanya Terek
    Sanya Terek 12 January 2018 22: 48
    +2
    Quote: Dzmicer
    Still, an interesting work among the descendants of the red executioners with their hands to the elbow in Russian blood: to discredit the ideas of personal freedom of man and democracy.

    This is the work of you, the ideological heirs of the Schutzmannschaft. And the article can be accepted as a guide to action by pr-kami such as Dzmicer, Olgovich, captain or lieutenant in someone else's uniform.