Army results: what has been done in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation for 2017 year

11
The newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda published an annual infographic on the results of the activities of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in 2017.

Army results: what has been done in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation for 2017 year
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    31 December 2017 13: 30
    Given the fact that long-range strike aircraft were excluded from the Navy’s aviation, the need arises for the restoration of this strike power, at least for the construction of the Su-34 navy, including reconnaissance modifications with an outboard radar and a rebuild station, plus new planes must be built so that the enemies know that there is nothing to swim closer than 500 km from our shore, we will drown in an instant.
    1. +2
      31 December 2017 14: 12
      I agree, but instead of the SU-34, I would suggest the MiG-29K
      1. +3
        31 December 2017 15: 42
        m.cempbell
        I agree, but instead of the SU-34, I would suggest the MiG-29K
        Brilliant. Offer
        1. +2
          31 December 2017 15: 58
          In vain, ulcerate. My post only related to the previous comment. Maintaining a dialogue from your understanding of the situation. For that, your comment can be attributed to the entire site - ban comments at all, because Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation our opinion on any issue to the bulb.
          1. +2
            31 December 2017 16: 00
            m.cempbell
            In vain, ulcerate. My post only related to the previous comment.
            I apologize, so I did not understand the topic hi
            .
            1. +2
              31 December 2017 16: 01
              Accepted. Happy drinks
    2. 0
      31 December 2017 14: 57
      In 2011, Russian naval aviation almost completely lost its strike component - its Tu-22М3 missile bombers, MiG-31, Su-27 fighters, Su-24 front-line bombers, and part of the transport aircraft were transferred to the Air Force. The only exceptions were the Su-24 bombers from the Black Sea Fleet aviation, which remained subordinate to the Navy due to the fact that agreements between Russia and Ukraine allowed only Naval Aviation to be based in the Crimea, but not the Russian Air Force.

      https://topwar.ru/?newsid=55207
      I think it’s come to return the Russian Navy Aviation to its former striking power, ....
      There was information that a regiment of Tu-22М3 long-range supersonic missile carriers (according to NATO's Backfire classification), which would act in the interests of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, could "land" at the Guards military airport near Simferopol. Even the term is called when the military unit will be equipped in the Crimea - 2016 year.

      http://army-news.ru/2014/03/krym-xotyat-prikryt-r
      aketonoscami-tu-22m3 /
      At the moment, they are not included in the Aviation of the same KChF

      43-th separate naval assault aviation regiment (Saki). (Su-24, Su-30СМ)
      318th Mixed Aviation Regiment (Kacha). (An-26, Ka-27PS / PL / 29, Be-12)

      I think with the advent of the United States WB in Bulgaria and Romania they will appear there, and the Russian Pacific Fleet has long been ripe for their return ....
    3. 0
      15 January 2018 12: 23
      Do I remember correctly that all aircraft of the Navy = TAVKR "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov"? Or does the Navy have land airports?

      I suppose that on the Aircraft Carrier the fleet of vehicles is equipped for all the tasks assigned to it.
      1. 0
        16 January 2018 20: 20
        Quote: Santjaga_Garka
        Do I remember correctly that all aircraft of the Navy = TAVKR "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov"? Or does the Navy have land airports?

        I suppose that on the Aircraft Carrier the fleet of vehicles is equipped for all the tasks assigned to it.

        Aviation of the Russian Navy consists of carrier-based and base aircraft ...
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    1 January 2018 12: 44
    Somewhere I already saw it. A couple of days ago on another military site site. And do not see updates. Why throw what was already. Am I clearly expressing myself? Does everyone have Zen? If not, then you're in flight.
    1. +1
      5 January 2018 13: 04
      I'm apparently in the span - what kind of Zen?
      1. +1
        5 January 2018 14: 18
        On Yandex-down. There are a lot of things about topics that interest you. If not, look, there should be a "scoreboard". Little. "Zen."