Ukrainian general: Crimean bridge is vulnerable to aviation and missiles

113
Edition "Glavred" publishes an interview with the ex-deputy chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Lieutenant-General Igor Romanenko. Candidate of military sciences, he is a doctor of technical sciences, professor commented on the construction by Russia of a bridge connecting the continental part of the country with the Crimea peninsula. The conversation turned to the "risks" for the Crimean Bridge. The Ukrainian general called one of such risks ... missiles.

From the statement Romanenko:
The bridge is a strategic artery that can provide the appropriate Crimean enemy grouping, as well as contribute to the economic growth of Crimea. Although from a military point of view, it is vulnerable enough to aviation, land and sea-based missiles.




Ukrainian general: Crimean bridge is vulnerable to aviation and missiles


And what is a typical civilian infrastructure object, by definition, vulnerable to missiles and aviation? And what level of expertise does this general give himself after thinking about the very possibility of launching a missile strike on a bridge? After such a “strike,” will Ukraine itself become vulnerable to missiles? ..

For reference: Romanenko at one time graduated from the Minsk Higher Engineering Air Defense Missile School of Air Defense in the radio engineering specialty (with honors); Military Command Academy Air Defense named after G.K. Zhukova (1981) (with honors); Academy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (1996); Kyiv National T. Shevchenko University in 2006, majoring in Finance.

Now this highly educated general is apparently reflecting on the possibility of launching missile strikes on the bridge, which will become the main transport artery for the Crimean peninsula.
113 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    30 December 2017 06: 05
    This delirium is already a hundred years old at lunch .. And yes, of course, this bridge is vulnerable. Hence, we must defend it by all means ..
    1. +6
      30 December 2017 06: 15
      Definitely and unconditionally.
    2. +2
      30 December 2017 06: 18
      I am sure it will be in case of something. Like any other our strategic object.
      1. +1
        30 December 2017 08: 10
        And the General Staff at the same time (very vulnerable to carry stronger .... hi
    3. +7
      30 December 2017 06: 39
      Health to this commander and strategist. And then he has such a void in his head that an uneven hour will blow, get sick and die .... Again, they will look for the “Kremlin hand”
      1. +7
        30 December 2017 09: 29
        It is necessary for our "Hot Heads" to declare the vulnerability of the cascade of dams on the Dnieper laughing
        1. +13
          30 December 2017 09: 34
          Quote: Rostovchanin
          It is necessary for our "Hot Heads" to declare the vulnerability of the cascade of dams on the Dnieper

          Russia does not fight with the inhabitants of the Ukrainian SSR, and does not destroy what our fathers and grandfathers built. We want to ignore Ukraine
          1. +2
            30 December 2017 09: 39
            Yes, no one is going to fight them, we have no less hot heads ... I mean that only a troll can besiege a troll ...
            1. +5
              30 December 2017 16: 39
              Quote: Rostovchanin
              Yes, no one is going to fight them, we have no less hot heads ... I mean that only a troll can besiege a troll ...

              If a cat has marked your car, then it is not necessary to run after this cat in the yard with his pants down, trying to repay the cat with the same ...
              1. +2
                30 December 2017 17: 08
                Quote: Nikolai Fedorov
                If a cat has marked your car, then it is not necessary to run after this cat in the yard with his pants down, trying to repay the cat with the same ...

                I agree, if I catch a cat, then I will castrate (this is the best option for him), and if I assess the chances of catching as zero, I will get the air, and then I will throw the carcass into the trash
                1. +2
                  31 December 2017 09: 49
                  Quote: faridg7
                  Quote: Nikolai Fedorov
                  If a cat has marked your car, then it is not necessary to run after this cat in the yard with his pants down, trying to repay the cat with the same ...

                  I agree, if I catch a cat, then I will castrate (this is the best option for him), and if I assess the chances of catching as zero, I will get the air, and then I will throw the carcass into the trash

                  I see ... A lover of war with cats ... I remember one such thing in the movie "Dog Heart" ... Well, yes, the cat has no air, he can’t answer, so you can safely take revenge.
                  1. +1
                    31 December 2017 10: 39
                    Well, I do not like it when animals spoil in my porch (and this cat or dog is on the drum). I have nothing against animals in the courtyard of the house, but if it, like the ex-cat of my mother-in-law, comes home to eat and shit in the corner, then I don’t care if he has air or not. And yet, I do not revenge, I just do not let the muck repeat.
              2. +1
                30 December 2017 17: 52
                Sorry, but I did otherwise. At first he caught the cat only then he caught his paws. Isn’t it so functional?
                1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +3
            30 December 2017 11: 32
            Quote: Chertt
            Russia does not fight with the inhabitants of the Ukrainian SSR, and does not destroy what our fathers and grandfathers built.

            hi
            You're right. Against this background, the moody statement of Dzhemilev's morel in Crimea is interesting:
            1. +3
              30 December 2017 11: 47
              "The Mejlis said that Crimea has always been Russian" ?? They already started changing shoes
              1. +2
                30 December 2017 11: 58
                Quote: Chertt
                They already started changing shoes


                What else remains? “Ukromejlis” is just a name and it costs nothing but the desire to spoil its own Crimean conservatives (and indeed conservatives, since in this gang-watering frivolous revolutions from Chechnya, Turkish Gaster, ISIS and Crimean Tatar godfathers and thieves) . Crimean Tatars officially rejected this "Majlis". So you have to “change shoes” because in Kukuev it’s not very calm and that’s why hetmanism will collapse, then only "everyone for himself". Yes
          3. +1
            30 December 2017 15: 53
            Quote: Chertt
            Russia does not fight with the inhabitants of the Ukrainian SSR, and does not destroy what our fathers and grandfathers built

            Residents of the Ukrainian SSR, suddenly, in the general mass became Ukrainians, and this is a big difference. And they themselves perfectly destroy what our fathers and grandfathers built. They don’t build their truth, but this is a separate article of their “pride”, but “free”. laughing
      2. 0
        30 December 2017 15: 48
        Quote: Chertt
        Health to this commander and strategist

        Apparently the air of Western "freedom" is very harmful to the psyche. How can a person who graduated back in Soviet times, a number of higher military institutions with honors, get so hurt by his head? Numbness of the nation on the face. laughing
    4. +2
      30 December 2017 09: 49
      Paton’s bridge is more vulnerable and Borispol runway identity
      1. +7
        30 December 2017 15: 10
        The former deputy chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, Lieutenant General Igor Romanenko, is also vulnerable ...
        Not just for the rocket, but for anyone past the whistling "magic pendell" ...
    5. +2
      30 December 2017 12: 19
      Quote: 210ox
      This delirium is already a hundred years old at lunch .. And yes, of course, this bridge is vulnerable. Hence, we must defend it by all means ..

      How is the vulnerability of Kiev as an object different from the vulnerability of the bridge? The fact that miss in Kiev is more difficult than over the bridge. The general should have known this.
    6. +3
      30 December 2017 12: 43
      Although from a military point of view, it is quite vulnerable to aviation, land and sea-based missiles.

      Given the fact that every day the air defense and missile defense of Crimea is strengthened, let this aircraft or the KR try to reach this bridge first ...
    7. +1
      30 December 2017 13: 14
      IMHO - there is a completely different probolemma - The sandy bottom of the Sea of ​​Azov is washed by sea currents. But we will eat up that the designers did take everything into account.
      1. 0
        31 December 2017 14: 06
        Quote: alexmach
        But we will eat up that the designers did take everything into account.

        Come on! wassat Who took into account what? Where are the designers from? In Russia, it’s always without a project, by sight ... Worried “not brothers” write that he sank from one side by a meter from the other - by one and a half, is about to collapse ... belay wassat
        You well reminded about the sand, and there everything is about clay, but about clay blenders ... laughing lol laughing
    8. 0
      31 December 2017 22: 15
      Kiev is also vulnerable to missiles. So let’s see what the urogeneralists get to.
  2. +13
    30 December 2017 06: 14
    Well, judging by the fact that he is a financier after the Ukrainian "university", one should not be surprised.
    In Hohland, this place is garbage for grandmas. So let yourself bleat ...
    Anyway, in Ukraine there are more higher educational institutions than in the gayrop. wink
    1. +8
      30 December 2017 06: 26
      I’m very surprised how your science has grown .. In quotation marks .. So many institutes .. Studies of the Holodomor, history before the Stone Age and the like .. And there are so many “scientists”! However, we have enough. Especially in the Ministry of Education ... no education.
      Quote: Fedorov
      Well, judging by the fact that he is a financier after the Ukrainian "university", one should not be surprised.
      In Hohland, this place is garbage for grandmas. So let yourself bleat ...
      Anyway, in Ukraine there are more higher educational institutions than in the gayrop. wink
      1. 0
        30 December 2017 07: 23
        Quote: 210ox
        I’m very surprised how your science has grown .. In quotation marks .. So many institutes .. Studies of the Holodomor, history before the Stone Age and the like .. And there are so many “scientists”! However, we have enough. Especially in the Ministry of Education ... no education.

        You surprise me! Any diploma will be made to you, at your request. But education is not. Even the ministry of education or non-education is your choice.
      2. 0
        31 December 2017 03: 43
        The Russian Federation in this discipline has not gone far from Ukraine that neither the minister, nor the deputy, especially from the "party in power", are all some scammers with diplomas bought.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      30 December 2017 11: 18
      This general’s head is a solid bone. Therefore, such thoughts.
  3. +2
    30 December 2017 06: 30
    Well, if it's just bombs and missiles,
    then the existence of Ukraine will be greatly reduced.
    And she’ll definitely lose the fleet, air defense and aviation,
    besides literally a week.
    1. 0
      30 December 2017 07: 17
      But didn’t she lose the fleet and aviation? Already? And a week .... What actually isn’t there ... And by the way, air defense can be knocked out within a couple of days, unless you have to chase the army.
      Quote: Zomanus
      Well, if it's just bombs and missiles,
      then the existence of Ukraine will be greatly reduced.
      And she’ll definitely lose the fleet, air defense and aviation,
      besides literally a week.
      1. 0
        2 January 2018 02: 57
        Yes, you say that, they have the same hetman Sagaidachny, they have the same strength, they wrote poorly, it seems that the tiles do not work in the galley and this is after its repair, sabotage on the face.
  4. +10
    30 December 2017 06: 50
    Ukrainian general: Crimean bridge is vulnerable to aircraft and missiles.


    The head of the Ukrainian general is defenseless in front of bullets. laughing It is urgent to change to something more reliable.
    1. +2
      30 December 2017 07: 28
      Quote: elektroleg
      The head of the Ukrainian general is defenseless in front of bullets.

      And also in front of the wife’s pan, if for her to argue the incriminating evidence on the general. Even Bill Clinton was powerless in front of his wife
    2. 0
      30 December 2017 11: 18
      is the pan suitable? Fits !!
  5. +6
    30 December 2017 06: 59
    As I put on my sword belt, I’m dumb and dumb ...
    What do they smoke there?
    Grass can’t do it, these are “substances”!
    That whole Minister of Defense broadcasts that the "cyborgs" are kept under the blows of nuclear weapons ?!
    Their professional job elevator works the other way around. The stupidest go upstairs.
    1. +2
      30 December 2017 07: 30
      Quote: Victor_B
      As I put on my sword belt, I’m dumb and dumb ...

      The more oaks in the army, the stronger the defense.
    2. 0
      30 December 2017 11: 19
      Well, if there are no others by definition?
  6. +4
    30 December 2017 07: 04
    Ukrainian general: Crimean bridge is vulnerable to aviation and missiles
    Shaw is not winter. I will bite. laughing Come on, start shelling the bridge. Or what are you going to do there. It's time to put an end to this circus.
  7. +2
    30 December 2017 07: 08
    The same can be said about Kiev.
  8. 0
    30 December 2017 07: 09
    Captain obvious! bully
  9. 0
    30 December 2017 07: 27
    Poor guy ... Any object is vulnerable ...
    It reached him only after 30 years of training ?!
    Well then what about the rest of the leadership of the territory of 404 ...
    1. 0
      30 December 2017 09: 23
      Poor guy ... Any object is vulnerable ...
      Only the black hole is invulnerable.
      1. +2
        30 December 2017 10: 20
        I apologize ... in my youth I pierced these black holes at a time ...
        1. +1
          30 December 2017 12: 33
          Quote: Ace Tambourine
          I apologize ... in my youth I pierced these black holes at a time ...

          What a bully you were in your youth wassat
  10. +2
    30 December 2017 07: 29
    Idiots ...
    This bridge is guarded by the SPECIAL team of the Russian Guard. And air defense will be the most powerful. In addition, this bridge - not one or even one hundred piles - much more. This bridge can only be destroyed by nuclear weapons. All other damage can be cured by special. patches, I'm sure there are specials. the engineering part will be. Because the bridge is of strategic importance for the transfer of troops to the Crimea. And by the way, it can already be used in this sense right now! True only by road. In general, tanks can already be deployed through it to the Crimea right now. So at the place of this dill, I would beware of declaring such statements)
    1. +2
      30 December 2017 07: 40
      A word of honor, city ... it’s enough to undermine 3-4 supports in length by underwater swimmers, and the bridge will rise for at least six months, with the attacks of the Air Force, Navy, etc.
      1. 0
        30 December 2017 08: 50
        Quote: Ace of Diamonds
        enough to undermine 3-4 supports in length by underwater swimmers

        mean lower the network
        1. +1
          30 December 2017 10: 18
          yeah ... and will forbid the passage of ships ...
          Maybe it’s easier to hire Ukrainians to just fill the isthmus under the bridge? And they are busy and running in, and we have the safety of the bridge ... Only then will it be needed in fig?
          1. 0
            30 December 2017 11: 19
            Quote: Ace of Diamonds
            yeah ... and will forbid the passage of ships ...

            the passage there in one place can not be covered with nets
      2. 0
        31 December 2017 00: 38
        Quote: Ace of Diamonds
        It is enough to undermine 3-4 supports in length by underwater swimmers, and the bridge will rise for at least six months

        Okst, what is half a year? Repair will take just a few days.
    2. +16
      30 December 2017 08: 09
      Quote: askme
      This bridge is guarded by the SPECIAL team of the Russian Guard. And air defense will be the most powerful. In addition, this bridge - not one or even one hundred piles - much more.

      I believe that everything you have listed is not enough. For absolute protection on the bridge you need to hang amulets. Namely: Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, Avakov, Klimkin, and this general for the company. Then it will be possible to not be afraid of either missiles, or aviation, or artillery.
      1. +3
        30 December 2017 08: 21
        Elegantly and with a twinkle)
  11. +1
    30 December 2017 07: 38
    The next pyatikantrop reported on the schedule, about his loyalty!
  12. +2
    30 December 2017 07: 39
    And this is how the rotten essence of the Ukrainian military is revealed! None of the "fraternal people" kiss him on the lips with desire. ???
  13. +10
    30 December 2017 07: 55
    Figs with him, with the bridge! I'm interested in something else!
    Until 91, there was quite a normal officer with two higher educations, with a successful career, and what turned into ???
    The Crimean bridge is not the whole of Romanenko, these statements are the whole point of the lieutenant general ...
    In order to occupy the Crimea, the Russians, under the guise of exercises and a sudden check, created the 100 thousandth offensive strike group, and then proceeded to annexation

    I want to remind you that when the planes took to the air, the Air Force commander did not decide to bring down military transport aircraft of Russia and helicopters. The chief of the General Staff also didn’t make such a decision .... Then an operation to hold the steppe Crimea was prepared, airplanes were already flying in the air, but again, at a meeting of the National Security and Defense Council, it was decided not to implement this operation

    .
    Then the Armed Forces of Ukraine actively joined, they drove them back, liberated Slavyansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkovka and other settlements, the Russians introduced their armored forces. This led to Ilovaisk and other consequences. Then the situation stabilized somewhat thanks to the Minsk agreements.
    The Russians understood that if they didn’t introduce forces in which they had an advantage — missiles, aircraft, armored forces — they would not be able to stop the AFU advance. And they introduced armored vehicles - otherwise the issue would have been resolved within a month.

    what I have long suspected that the trident on the cockade somehow affects the forces of universal scale and these forces begin to accumulate excessively in the head of the trident owner, while the pressure of the forces begins to depress the brain, hence the headdress beloved by many Ukrainians - a pan! The pan prevents the cosmic forces from coming out and prolongs the mental pleasure caused by the lack of thoughts!
    1. +1
      30 December 2017 09: 27
      Yes, everything is very simple. The fact is that in the 90s the majority of the ballast went to the Ukrainian army - drunkards, rowdy, daddy's sons, with black marks and so on. Moreover, they left the Armed Forces with an increase or with views on rapid growth. The same applied to the military schools. Now they are reaping the benefits of all this.
  14. +1
    30 December 2017 08: 02
    The bridge will be protected anyway. And this "strategist" forgets that on three (and a half-Belarus) sides, Russian troops are standing at the borders of Ukraine.
  15. +1
    30 December 2017 08: 11
    The majority of Ukrainian bridges are vulnerable to loaded KamAZ trucks, especially grain carriers, there is even one that can’t resist the Lada. hi
  16. +2
    30 December 2017 08: 16
    Only a couple of maidans are needed -
    To the smithereens of Krain.
    Good only to the panamas
    But with a high rank.
  17. +2
    30 December 2017 08: 25
    The candidate of military sciences, he is also a doctor of technical sciences, professor commented on the construction by Russia of a bridge connecting the mainland with the Crimean peninsula. The conversation turned to “risks” for the Crimean bridge. The Ukrainian general called one of these risks ... missiles.

    This "professor" is not aware that ALL bridges are vulnerable to missiles. Then the court and jail will take care of such figures, if there is a terrorist attack with the bridge, we’ll catch everyone and count.
  18. +18
    30 December 2017 08: 39
    Any bridge is vulnerable
    First goal
  19. +4
    30 December 2017 08: 46
    I think so - this option was calculated just in case by our command and the bridge is now covered, both from the air and the sea. And from inadequate brain shifts, and from "accidentally off course missiles"
  20. +2
    30 December 2017 08: 48
    Although from a military point of view, it is quite vulnerable to aviation, land and sea-based missiles.
    I understand that ANY bridge is vulnerable to missiles and aircraft
  21. 0
    30 December 2017 09: 16
    Well, how would aviation and missiles be needed for that, wouldn't it?
  22. +4
    30 December 2017 09: 24
    Well, since a senior Ukrainian general is threatening us, we need to think about the land route to the Crimea.
    1. +1
      30 December 2017 11: 29
      The so-called corridor.
  23. +8
    30 December 2017 10: 10
    Ukrainian general is vulnerable to a bullet in the back of his head.
    Did I say something supernatural?
    1. 0
      30 December 2017 10: 26
      The most vulnerable wallet ...
      If he begins to pay on our part, you will hear such praises about invulnerability ....
      1. +4
        30 December 2017 10: 33
        Of course, this is not a general, but a talking head.
  24. +2
    30 December 2017 10: 35
    The bridge is only as vulnerable as Ukraine itself is. Wanted in the Stone Age?
  25. +1
    30 December 2017 10: 41
    In general, in my primitive opinion, it was easier to dig an isthmus between NashKrym and Urkaina, and move the soil to create an isthmus between the same Crimea and Russia.
  26. +1
    30 December 2017 10: 50
    It’s invulnerable for Ukrainians, because in a couple of years there will be no missiles or aircraft in Ukraine, but there are a lot of generals and admirals. If only they will be launched. They have a suitable warhead, but just don’t launch them, they immediately fly to Kiev, to feeders and dachas.
  27. +2
    30 December 2017 10: 55
    This is what I did not like about the read article. This article is in the same style as I wanted to do Skobeev in 60 minutes. This program provides an audience with the enemies of Russia, Ukrainian "experts" as well as all kinds of alarmists. And in response. as if a slight irony, that's how you guys got excited, and maybe you're right. Some kind of one-sided freedom of speech is theirs. As we have been led, the author makes fun of the Ukrainian general. But even this does it as if pitifully, here, they say, what a prankster. and he graduated from the Minsk school, as if they had graduated from the Minsk school - these are guaranteedly smart people. It would be reasonable to answer the general that not a single missile fired from Ukraine would reach the Crimean bridge. And if this is not so, then you should think about security.
  28. +1
    30 December 2017 11: 02
    another "general" Ukrainian discovered "America." ...
  29. 0
    30 December 2017 11: 03
    it must be a rare idiot in order to inflict a missile strike on the brainchild of GDP ... then Putin will not leave a living place from the aggressor
  30. +4
    30 December 2017 11: 40
    "Ukrainian general: Crimean bridge is vulnerable to aviation and missiles"
    Well, a complete trindets. Not only the brain of the Ukrainian general can be vulnerable to aviation and missiles. It doesn’t seem to hit him. wassat
  31. +1
    30 December 2017 11: 54
    They always said that it is a holographic bridge, virtually real. And now it turns out that he is still made of concrete and steel. The bridge is likely to be protected by the “Shells” and a special anti-sabotage unit, so let it leave missions of missiles.
    1. 0
      30 December 2017 18: 11
      A whole division of explosives has been allocated to guard the Kerch bridge, which in my opinion is even excessive, but if this Bandera cannot be drunk, then let him try ... he will make a lot of adventures on his ass ...
  32. +2
    30 December 2017 12: 12
    The brain of the Ukrainian general is invulnerable due to its absence ...
  33. +2
    30 December 2017 12: 20
    Mr. Romanenko, the main thing is not to forget that Kiev is also “vulnerable to aviation and missiles”!
  34. +2
    30 December 2017 12: 44
    He voiced the obvious things. In the event of an open collision, the bridge will become a target. Achievable or not is another question. But I suppose that the ukrogenstaff has no such plans now. Their level of provocation, maximum diversion in the Crimea.
  35. +1
    30 December 2017 12: 58
    Quote: 210ox
    This delirium is already a hundred years old at lunch .. And yes, of course, this bridge is vulnerable. Hence, we must defend it by all means ..


    And they will ...
  36. +2
    30 December 2017 13: 09
    It is interesting, but the residence of the President of Krajina and the Verkhovna Rada, together with the General Staff and the SBU, have the risks of being destroyed overnight? But even an attempt to attack the bridge can be seen as a declaration of war and the legality of retaliatory actions on the part of Russia. In my opinion, this general is stupid if he needed so many academies. For a normal person, one academy is enough to calculate the risks of a rash attack.
  37. Hog
    +2
    30 December 2017 13: 22
    Of course, like any large structure.
  38. +1
    30 December 2017 13: 33
    "Expert" is clearly in regression.
  39. +2
    30 December 2017 13: 34
    near the s-400 bridge stands
  40. +1
    30 December 2017 13: 57
    And this is a Russian Soviet officer.
    1. +3
      30 December 2017 16: 44
      This is not a Russian officer. a STAND
  41. +1
    30 December 2017 14: 51
    So the bridge on the mosfilm removed.
  42. +1
    30 December 2017 16: 00
    "Ukrainian general: Crimean bridge is vulnerable to aviation and missiles"
    “So the Urkain general decided that all the other bridges in the world are immune from these weapons.” - This "thinker" clearly "suffers" genius ...
  43. +1
    30 December 2017 16: 30
    Masterfully, and which bridges are invulnerable, I want to learn from this general, so to speak, the language does not turn, but a moron
  44. +4
    30 December 2017 16: 38
    Probably not only the bridge is vulnerable from this point of view, but large cities in Crimea, as well as the cities of St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad are vulnerable to missile and air attacks from the Baltic states or Poland. But Mr. General should understand such a nuance: namely, the presence of nuclear weapons and means of their prompt delivery from the state, which he was going to swipe at. This is probably why his colleagues from the excellent Brussels club for the promotion of Russophobia are more modest in their statements, or maybe just better aware of the defense doctrine of our state.
    I look forward to this bridge, and he scatters the bastard.
    1. KCA
      0
      31 December 2017 09: 21
      Since the defense doctrine of the Russian Federation has long ago included the possibility of a preventive nuclear strike in the event of a threat to statehood, an attack by an object such as the Crimean Bridge could well be considered a serious threat to the use of, if not strategic, then tactical nuclear charges
  45. 0
    30 December 2017 16: 42
    There were no less before (about talking idiots).
    Only then there was no internet. fellow smile
  46. +1
    30 December 2017 16: 53
    Well, just a stupid general, and probably building this miracle of the century, Russia thought about how to protect him, if you want to try to get the gentlemen to snot ...
  47. +2
    30 December 2017 17: 51
    Although from a military point of view, it is quite vulnerable to aviation, land and sea-based missiles.

    Apparently the general’s head is also vulnerable to aviation, land and sea-based missiles, but he still did not understand this?
  48. +3
    30 December 2017 17: 59
    This is so, but how vulnerable Kiev is. And the general himself is not such a small goal.
  49. +2
    30 December 2017 18: 05
    The Verkhovna Rada building and others are also vulnerable to missiles and aircraft ...
  50. 0
    30 December 2017 18: 13
    Come on! What did the man say? The bridge is vulnerable, yes. And here it is:
    Now this highly educated general is apparently reflecting on the possibility of launching missile strikes on the bridge, which will become the main transport artery for the Crimean peninsula.
    The author thought of a degree of material.
    Why are you! The author sees the thoughts of the general ....
  51. 0
    30 December 2017 18: 17
    What a woodpecker... Any bridge is vulnerable to aircraft and missiles...
  52. +2
    30 December 2017 20: 04
    Not Captain Obvious, but the Admiral is clear Buoy! Tell me something I don't know...
  53. Say
    0
    30 December 2017 23: 40
    This Radavukraina of theirs is also vulnerable to missile strikes and aircraft.
  54. 0
    31 December 2017 13: 24
    Ukrainian general: Crimean bridge is vulnerable to aviation and missiles

    I wonder what the chances are for Ukrainian bridges on the Dnieper to survive; they are apparently more resistant to missile and bomb attacks from the air and ground...
  55. +1
    31 December 2017 13: 30
    In theory, nothing is invulnerable. And you try Romanenko am
  56. 0
    31 December 2017 16: 18
    There are no problems in protecting the Crimean Bridge: neither from the air, nor from land, nor under water. The problem is the cost of such protection. All projects were carried out with Yanukovych’s money - this is 90 billion dollars and an artificial collapse of the ruble. That's another $500 billion. The question arises: will the Russian oligarchic economy be able to provide services for all existing and planned projects? Russia can count on Chinese loans in exchange for raw materials from the Far East and Siberia.
    1. +2
      1 January 2018 15: 32
      I completely agree with the first part of your speech. I don't see any problem in defending the bridge. The next part is very controversial. What kind of extra costs are required to protect it?! So, every meter is shot through (figuratively speaking)... Well, then it all went out of the realm of fantasy. Did Comrade Putin personally report to you about this state of affairs?!!
  57. +1
    31 December 2017 19: 41
    The Ukrainian general is completely un-Copenhagen. . Who compares the bridge with fortifications? This is not a bunker or bunker. This is a bridge whose purpose is to connect the banks for the transport of goods and people and that’s it. It is clear that it will not withstand bomb attacks. And it is clear that in order to protect it, it will be necessary to install S-300 and Shilki and other Pantsirs on both banks.
    1. +2
      1 January 2018 15: 19
      There are suspicions that everything has been standing for a long time. And even since they pulled the power cable from the mainland. I am generally not inclined to underestimate the mental abilities of our command.
      1. 0
        2 January 2018 01: 10
        According to the most minimal estimates, the construction of the Crimean Bridge amounts to 226,7 billion rubles. Every year, a couple of billion rubles will be spent on maintenance of the bridge, to this we will add the forces of the operational anti-sabotage group of the Novorossiysk naval base of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy, the Border Directorate of the FSB of Russia for the Republic of Crimea, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the transport security division of construction.
  58. 0
    2 January 2018 17: 38
    I can also add from myself: the forehead is vulnerable to a bullet!
  59. 0
    3 January 2018 18: 25
    crests must constantly be slammed with their faces on the table so that crests begin to show remote signs of intelligence
  60. 0
    3 January 2018 21: 51
    The mayoral general decided to scare the bear with his bare ass. laughing