Putin ratified the agreement on the base of the Russian Navy in Tartus

21
Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law ratifying the agreement between Russia and Syria to expand the logistics center of the Russian Navy near the port of Tartus and actually turn it into a full-fledged naval base. The document, adopted by the State Duma 21 December and approved by the Federation Council 26 December, was published in a single portal legal information.

Putin ratified the agreement on the base of the Russian Navy in Tartus




According to the document, the Russian military naval vessels, including nuclear cruisers, will be able to enter the internal waters and ports of Syria. Syria transfers to Russia for free use for the entire term of the agreement (49 years with the possibility of automatic renewal for periods of 25 years) land, water areas and a number of real estate objects. The location of the point of logistics, its personnel and crew members have the privileges and immunity under the jurisdiction of the Russian side. In addition, the personnel of the point, as well as contractors can freely cross the border of Syria and are not subject to inspection by the border and customs authorities of the SAR.

The agreement grants Russia the right to hold up to 11 warships, including ships with nuclear power plants at the MTO point of the Russian Navy at the same time.

Representatives of the Syrian authorities can not visit the place of deployment of the logistics point of the Russian Navy without the consent of its commander. The agreement also provides that vehicles, ships and aircraft of the base in Tartus are inviolable, enjoy immunity from inspection, search, requisition, arrest and other coercive measures. All property items MTO is also inviolable.

The external protection of the borders of places of deployment of the logistics center is carried out by the forces and means of the Syrian side, while the protection of the external maritime borders and the air defense of the point, the internal protection and maintenance of law and order are carried out by the forces and means of the Russian side.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    29 December 2017 16: 05
    Off-topic news: the United States intends to send its peacekeeping contingent to the border of Russia and Donbass. This was stated by the official representative of the State Department, Heather Nauert. This is kooky.
    1. +10
      29 December 2017 16: 15
      Wanting is not harmful, but nothing good will come of it.
      1. +5
        29 December 2017 16: 23
        Bullshit! Exceptional can not be there, because there you can get and on the tinsel ..
        Quote: Going
        Wanting is not harmful, but nothing good will come of it.
    2. +3
      29 December 2017 16: 24
      do they want to play the Korean script? Luli liked to receive?
    3. +4
      29 December 2017 18: 56
      Let them dream, but who will let them go there?
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +2
      29 December 2017 23: 32
      Quote: dorz
      Off-topic news: the United States intends to send its peacekeeping contingent to the border of Russia and Donbass. This was stated by the official representative of the State Department, Heather Nauert. This is kooky.

      Labuden is ... When placing a contingent, in addition to the UN mandate, warranties of the warring parties are necessary to ensure the security of the peacekeeping contingent. If dill play up mattresses, then LDNR is unlikely. Of course, the "wise" will insist that Russia guarantee security, but we are not a party to the conflict and it is also unlikely that we will subscribe to this initiative. this will entail recognition of our participation in the conflict. Do we need it?
  2. +6
    29 December 2017 16: 07
    A full BASE, but not one ...
    1. +4
      29 December 2017 16: 48
      Quote: svp67
      A full BASE, but not one ...

      Straits, trade routes, trans-Iranian channel ... our interests feel
  3. +4
    29 December 2017 16: 21
    Good tidings! The base, almost forever given to Russia. It can be considered that - this is complete control over the Mediterranean Sea and almost all of Central Asia. good
    1. +5
      29 December 2017 16: 28
      Quote: Simon
      Good tidings! The base, almost forever given to Russia. It can be considered that - this is complete control over the Mediterranean Sea. good

      No almost forever, and while the pro-Russian leadership was in power. So for Assad, naval base of Tartus (and VVB Khmeimim) is not as profitable as it is for us. smile
    2. +9
      29 December 2017 16: 29
      And we got it on very favorable terms, God forbid that Russia would gain a foothold there.
      1. +1
        29 December 2017 16: 37
        Yes, even if it didn’t work out like with Ukraine, otherwise you will have to take half of Syria into Russia lol
        1. +4
          29 December 2017 16: 43
          Isn't it already? wink
          1. +7
            29 December 2017 16: 47
            A typo, an example to all typos. lol
          2. +2
            29 December 2017 16: 48
            why then with a smile. I wrote about two years ago that the GDP at the meeting of the security forces said so that we would not give Syria up to joining the Russian Federation.
    3. 0
      29 December 2017 19: 13
      Quote: Simon
      It can be considered that - this is complete control over the Mediterranean Sea and almost all of Central Asia.


      Subject to the further development of our Navy ... hi
  4. +3
    29 December 2017 17: 40
    Now, if the base was opened in Cuba, at the Americans under the nose. Here is the thing !!!!
  5. +1
    29 December 2017 21: 22
    Great news, every Great Power should have bases (allies) around the World. Of course, we are not quite, Great, but we must strive for this.
  6. 0
    30 December 2017 06: 48
    Good news.
    The main thing is that some new “Gorbachev" or "Yeltsin"
    did not come to power. And then, again, they will destroy everything ..
    1. 0
      30 December 2017 11: 12
      Or a stubborn collective farmer who considered that maintaining bases abroad is too expensive and you need to buy corn with this money. Yes
    2. +1
      30 December 2017 21: 02
      Gorbachev must be punished so that it would be disgraceful for others.
  7. +1
    30 December 2017 21: 00
    It is also necessary to place nuclear weapons there, in Turkey there is an American one.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"