Fight in the Polish swamp

19

Portrait of Alexei Shcherbatov workshop of George Dow. For courage in the battles of Golymin and Preussis-Eylau, he was awarded the Order of St. George of the IV degree

In the battle with the French at Golymin, which took place on December 26 of 1806, the Russians were greatly helped by the peculiarities of the Polish landscape.



By diplomatic means to limit Napoleon’s conquering plans and his desire to “cut and redraw the map of Europe as he wishes,” Russia, like other European states, did not have the opportunity.

The only way to stop the French aggression was military action. The formation of anti-French coalitions, which took place before Napoleon became the sovereign ruler of France, was continued in subsequent years, and Russia was a full-fledged participant, with the exception of the fifth, of all coalitions.

In the war of the Third Coalition, Russia suffered great losses (the battle of Austerlitz), but continued the war against the greatly strengthened France as part of the Fourth Coalition, which also included Prussia and Great Britain.

In October 1806, at the battle of Jena and Auerstedt (Thuringia), Corsican troops easily defeated the Prussian army, frozen "in the forms bequeathed by Frederick the Great", after which the hostilities were moved to the east.

Napoleon's army was strengthened; in December, 80 of thousands of recruits joined it, which they quickly equipped and sent to East Prussia. Napoleon was looking for a general battle with the Russians, but instead there were battles with separate units. December 24 - a battle near Charnov, December 26 - two battles at once, near the city of Pułtusk and at Golimin.

As the historian Jean Tulard notes, the theater of operations that awaited Napoleon “did not correspond either to his genius or to the conditions in which the Grand Army was accustomed to maneuver and fight. In addition, the Russians burned everything during the retreat, which created additional difficulties with food. On the contrary, the Russian army, numerous and stubborn, operated in its usual geographical and climatic conditions. Instead of the planned blitzkrieg, the French were bogged down in the mud, experienced supply difficulties, suffered from cold and damp, and in the rear were subjected to indiscriminate attacks by the Prussian partisans.

It was difficult for Napoleon to understand the situation, he made a mistake by deciding that the main forces of the Russians were located in Golymin, while they were at Pultusk. He sent Marshal Lannes to this town with an 20-thousand army, and three corps under the command of Augereau, Davout and Soult, with a total of 38 thousand men, were sent to Golemynu.

This settlement had a detachment of prince 10-12-thousandth detachment of prince Dmitry Golitsyn, assembled from regiments of different divisions, on the day of the attack the French troops joined the detachment of prince Golitsyn several more scattered detachments that were cut off from their divisions.

Russian detachments took up a position in front of Golymin, covered by a bend in a swampy river, the left flank was the Kostroma Infantry Regiment under the command of Prince Alexei Shcherbatov, the right flank was three squadrons of Pskov dragoons and order cuirassiers. In the center - the Dnieper musketeer and Tauride grenadier regiments, reinforced by dragoons and cuirassiers. The first blow was taken by the Kostroma regiment, Prince Shcherbatov, in order to maintain the morale of the soldiers, among whom there were many recruits, he himself took the regimental banner and restored the faltering system.

The French tried to seize our artillery, which inflicted heavy damage, however, this did not succeed in making the body of the Augereau. Marshall notes that "the Russian canister and impassable swamp forced the division to retreat."

At three o'clock in the afternoon, detachments of Count Palen and Chaplits came to the aid of Golitsyn and Dokhturov, fresh forces helped restrain the advance of the French, who were joined first by Davout corps, and later by Soult corps along with Napoleon.

Fights were transported to the streets of Golymina and turned into desperate melee fights. The Russians managed to carry out an organized retreat and escape from the superior enemy forces. In this battle, the loss of the Russian side amounted to about a thousand people, the French about the same.

The hopes of Napoleon in the encirclement and destruction of the Russian army under Golymin and Pultusk were defeated.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    3 January 2018 07: 18
    The hopes of Napoleon in the encirclement and destruction of the Russian army under Golymin and Pultusk were defeated.

    Yes ... the Russian army always won battles when it fought ...
    not by the rules of the enemy.
    And now it is also relevant for RUSSIA as many centuries ago ...

    if we conduct ourselves in politics, war, economics by our own rules, we will surely win.
  2. +7
    3 January 2018 07: 20
    Alexey Shcherbatov participated in the battles of Brest, Kobrin and Gorodechnaya. He distinguished himself in the battles of Borisov and Studenka, in the siege of Thorne and in the battles of Königsvarta and Bauzen, and was seriously wounded in the latter, then distinguished himself in battles on the Katzbach River and near Levenberg, took part in the siege of Soissons and the capture of Paris.
  3. +1
    3 January 2018 09: 57
    Russia has done everything to stop the Corsican monster before it invades Russia.
    Allies brought...
    1. AKC
      +3
      3 January 2018 11: 00
      Why a monster? I think you need to get away from the cliches. In honor of the monster, they will not name the cake, cognac. I haven’t heard a code about Hitler’s cake. or brandy Pol-pot!
      The Russian people expelled Napoleon, because the Frenchman cannot be the Russian Tsar. Only a German can be a Russian Tsar. (Lotman Yuri Mikhailovich).
      1. +4
        3 January 2018 11: 42
        There is one myth in the article that comes from the time of tsarist historiography about the war of 1805. In general, this war was waged not against some expansion of Napoleon, but in the interests of maintaining the influence of English capital, which put together an anti-French coalition. It is no coincidence that Napoleon, when making peace with his opponents, set them the condition of a commercial blockade of England.
        1. +3
          3 January 2018 12: 38
          Quote: Rastas
          the war was not waged against any expansion of Napoleon,

          Well, yes, the expansion (of the occupation of Europe), it turns out, was "NOT" fool
          1. +2
            3 January 2018 15: 35
            The struggle of English and French capital for markets. The natural continuation of any bourgeois revolution. The Netherlands and England after their revolutions went to actively conquer the colonies, in the 19th century, after the victory of the North in the US Civil War, the expansion of the western territory of America began, Japan after the Meiji revolution invaded Korea and China. France in this series was no exception. Moreover, Russia's allies were by no means peaceful, but they themselves went to war with France as a dangerous competitor.
      2. +1
        3 January 2018 12: 36
        Quote: AKC
        at. In honor of the monster, they will not name the cake, cognac. I haven’t heard a code about Hitler’s cake. or brandy Pol-pot!

        Cake is yes, evidence of "respect"! lol
        In France, Napoleon is FORGOTTEN completely, in the textbooks about his campaigns, practically NOT a word, only his affairs in the civilian sphere are mentioned.
        And rightly so, France became depopulated after his adventures, having suffered a grave defeat.
        1. +3
          3 January 2018 15: 50
          How do you know what is forgotten? In Venice, during an excursion, the Venetian, talking about the fall of Venice, said that with the Russians she could rebuke Napoleon without fear. And with the French, on the second remark to Napoleon, French tourists begin to grumble.
          1. +2
            4 January 2018 06: 50
            Quote: Rastas
            How do you know what is forgotten? In Venice, during an excursion, the Venetian, talking about the fall of Venice, said that with the Russians she could rebuke Napoleon without fear. And with the French, on the second remark to Napoleon, French tourists begin to grumble.

            I wrote, from where: in French TEXTBOOKS it doesn't exist. In journalism, only negative reviews about military campaigns. He is no longer a hero
        2. +2
          3 January 2018 16: 47
          Quote: Olgovich
          Quote: AKC
          at. In honor of the monster, they will not name the cake, cognac. I haven’t heard a code about Hitler’s cake. or brandy Pol-pot!

          Cake is yes, evidence of "respect"! lol
          In France, Napoleon is FORGOTTEN completely, in the textbooks about his campaigns, practically NOT a word, only his affairs in the civilian sphere are mentioned.
          And rightly so, France became depopulated after his adventures, having suffered a grave defeat.

          NAPOLEON has not been forgotten anywhere. Many peoples of the world remember the GREAT FRENCH.
          1. +2
            4 January 2018 06: 51
            Quote: katana
            NAPOLEON has not been forgotten anywhere. Many peoples of the world remember the GREAT FRENCH.

            Do not write Nonsense without owning the question.
            1. 0
              4 January 2018 08: 30
              + Ol'govich Lyubezny, it seems to me that you are very stupid, but why should everyone around you know about this.
      3. +4
        3 January 2018 14: 53
        AKS, do you want such a cake?
        I would not be so categorical: where is the guarantee that some fanatic of fascism, and them in different variations of "cart and cart", does not decorate the cake with a similar name? I remember in Novoye Vremya there was a note that in the center of Singapore there was a cafe "Adolf Hitler "and" signature "drink with the name of the Fuhrer. By the way, there is a version that the famous drink: "Bloody Mary" is named after the English Queen Mary.
  4. +1
    3 January 2018 14: 32
    Quote: Olgovich
    Russia has done everything to stop the Corsican monster before it invades Russia.
    Allies brought...

    Olgovich, apparently, you did not read K. Marx, he wrote that the Russians enter the war when the allies do everything.
    But seriously and without jesting, the Russians have always had to be content with very mediocre allies. We look at the history: "The Great Embassy" of Peter1, they were looking for allies in the war with Turkey, and the result was "shish with poppies". Peter the Great was treated like a monkey at the fair, they were told "forty barrels of prisoners" and .... that's all. war, who was Peter's ally? Elector Saxony August is "strong", and the ally will betray him even looking. (Comrades, I recommend the book "Fiscals of Peter the Great" Nedushkin, it is small, but interesting) We go further Austerlitz and subsequent events, a lot of allies helped Russia ? And the so-called "Crimean War", something I don't remember significant help. Once again I recall the words of the EIV Alexander 3: "Russia has only two true allies: its army and fleet"
  5. +1
    3 January 2018 15: 03
    Quote: Rastas
    There is one myth in the article that comes from the time of tsarist historiography about the war of 1805. In general, this war was waged not against some expansion of Napoleon, but in the interests of maintaining the influence of English capital, which put together an anti-French coalition. It is no coincidence that Napoleon, when making peace with his opponents, set them the condition of a commercial blockade of England.

    Have you looked into history for a long time? I remember at the beginning of the "Syrian operation" the librarians commented in almost the same way, but instead of English capital they talked about the vested interests of the military and the president
    1. +1
      3 January 2018 15: 26
      Before you bring any historical parallels, indicate what I'm wrong?
  6. +2
    3 January 2018 15: 24
    “It did not match either his genius or the conditions in which the Great Army was used to maneuvering and fighting,” of course Napoleon was used to fighting on a schedule: until six I was fighting with Josephine in bed, from six I sent matchmakers to Franz Joseph, from 10 to 12 a band of Prussians. I have always been interested: why are cockroaches and Germans equally great?
    But Russians do not like fighting. Consequently, Napoleon can go to the international court of human rights: the Russians didn’t like the war anyway, which means that all the victories of the Russian troops are not considered valid. I think Manstein and Halder would also have signed up to such a complaint.
  7. +3
    3 January 2018 16: 03
    In France, Napoleon is FORGOTTEN completely, in the textbooks about his campaigns, practically NOT a word, only his affairs in the civilian sphere are mentioned.
    This fact in no way diminishes the importance of Napoleon's personality. It only says that the person who wrote the comment is at odds with his own logic. For the sake of momentary political and ideological interests at all times and in all countries, many historical figures have been undeservedly hushed up and undeservedly extolled. France now, like all of Europe, suffers from tolerance. Yes, and Olgovichi are found not only in Romania. That is why Napoleon in France is now in disgrace.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"