Military Review

The United States refused to conduct intelligence activities in the SAR, together with Russia

19
The US military refused the offer of the Russian Defense Ministry to conduct joint intelligence activities in Syria, reports Interfax report of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov.




Our proposals on the organization of joint planning, reconnaissance, the destruction of terrorists, stumbled upon misunderstanding, refusal ... We didn’t see their desire to interact,
said Gerasimov in an interview with the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda.

He noted that "joint planning, striking, conducting operations would be of great benefit."

Recall that the Russian military operation in Syria has been carried out since September 30, 2015. Aviation The Russian Aerospace Forces supports ground operations of the Syrian army. Russia in Syria has an air base at the Khmeimim airport and a naval base in Tartus. 48 Russian troops passed through Syria.

At the end of November, Gerasimov said that after the reduction of the grouping in Syria, there would remain a reconciliation center, two bases and "a number of structures necessary to maintain this situation, which has now been established."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Shura Perm
    Shura Perm 27 December 2017 10: 50 New
    +5
    They are recruiting, we are destroying, in these circumstances we can’t see friendship, we are on opposite sides of the barricades
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 27 December 2017 10: 53 New
      +7
      Our proposals for organizing joint planning, conducting reconnaissance, and eliminating terrorists came across a misunderstanding, a refusal ... We did not see their desire to interact

      The bolt is clear - they will merge Old on their own pupils. But collaboration also involves the exchange of intelligence. And it will immediately become clear who is fighting, and who is getting out of attack. Although everything is clear to everyone.
      1. figwam
        figwam 27 December 2017 10: 59 New
        +3
        US military rejects RF Ministry of Defense proposal to conduct joint intelligence activities in Syria

        It’s hard to carry joint activities with the Yankees when you are on the other side of the front line.
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 27 December 2017 11: 02 New
          +5
          Therefore, one should not even begin. I suspect that the proposal for joint intelligence was made because the US response was known in advance. But now there is a fact of failure. Usually the United States does this, but not this time. Have you been ahead of the curve? wink
      2. dorz
        dorz 27 December 2017 11: 03 New
        +3
        ... refused to conduct intelligence activities in the SAR together with Russia

        Just as they refused a week ago to exchange letters of guarantee of non-interference in each other's internal affairs. The Americans are going to kill us, and not cooperate with Russia.
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 27 December 2017 11: 06 New
          +6
          Quote: dorz
          The Americans are going to kill us, and not cooperate with Russia.

          Tough but true! Taking off my hat hi
      3. x.andvlad
        x.andvlad 27 December 2017 11: 37 New
        +1
        Our proposals for organizing joint planning, reconnaissance, and the destruction of terrorists came across a misunderstanding, a refusal ...
        What's so surprising? The Americans and I have almost completely different definitions of terrorists.
        In the end, stop begging them for interaction. We sometimes start to look like Cat Leopold.
      4. Warrior with machine gun
        Warrior with machine gun 27 December 2017 14: 02 New
        +3
        refuse, so let them get out of there to their puddle, especially since they have no reason to be in Syria, because you can calibrate amertz tourists in those parts.
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 27 December 2017 14: 06 New
          +3
          Eugene, hello! hi They just don’t want to get out and they don’t care that they have no legal reason to be in Syria. But they have not written laws - they are "exceptional". am
          Quote: Warrior with machine gun
          otherwise tourists can be calibrated in those parts of the world

          Not only possible, but necessary. I am sure that I am not the only one to think so.
          1. Warrior with machine gun
            Warrior with machine gun 27 December 2017 14: 18 New
            +3
            I’m talking about this, if direct speech, established laws and treaties do not work, it is necessary to exclude the "exceptional" from the lists of living earthlings (they have no problem with this when they need to bury someone) so that dogs need to be shown that lawless people do not live long (remember at least Aloizycha)
  2. jolly deckhand
    jolly deckhand 27 December 2017 10: 51 New
    +5
    They are consistent. good We have never been called partners. Not that we ... smile
    1. Sergey53
      Sergey53 27 December 2017 11: 04 New
      +3
      You are right about the sequence. They spend it, if you look closely, in everything. Quality by the way is very valuable.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 27 December 2017 11: 41 New
        +1
        jolly deckhand
        They are consistent. We have never been called partners. Not that we ...
        Sergey
        You are right about the sequence. They spend it, if you look closely, in everything.

        This was also said by Stalin.

  3. Masya masya
    Masya masya 27 December 2017 11: 01 New
    +6
    We did not see their desire to interact,

    where does desire and understanding come from? when do we destroy their child?
  4. Sergey53
    Sergey53 27 December 2017 11: 02 New
    +1
    It is generally necessary for them to make a no-fly zone.
  5. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 27 December 2017 11: 19 New
    +1
    It is natural how it can be collaborated with americas if the goals and objectives are different. It's time to prepare for the expulsion of the United States from the territory of the SAR, and not talk about cooperation. It's time to stop cheating yourself.
  6. Mentat
    Mentat 27 December 2017 13: 33 New
    0
    Quote: jolly deckhand
    They are consistent. good We have never been called partners. Not that we ... smile

    Consistently and insinuatingly, you are itching here on the site, trying to impose on your visitors a certain impression of the continuous mistakes of the Russian leadership. Are you just a senior citizen who itches in one place or would you be worth it for a scruff and a clove?

    Meanwhile, the word “partnership” as well as “partner” appears in NATO official documents (https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_5009
    0.htm), in official EU documents (http://eeas.europa.eu/russia/docs/2011_eu-russia
    _leaflet_en.pdf), in the US press (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/opinion/the-r
    ussia-us-partnership-driven-to-a-new-low.html; http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-skeptics/ame
    ricas-russia-dilemma-big-problem-or-potential-par
    tner-17941; https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/syria/201
    7-11-23 / russias-questionable-counterterrorism-rec
    ord), in statements by US senior management (Donald Trump Tweets About Russian Cyber ​​Security Partnership), and business (e.g. http://www.russiapartners.ru/firm-profile-ru/)
    The Russian leadership simply invariably emphasizes the fact that the common ground, for example in the security sphere, has always been and is, which is almost inevitable for the two strongest world powers.
    Therefore, you are simply a bullshit, frankly speaking.
  7. iouris
    iouris 27 December 2017 13: 41 New
    0
    Cooperation with the US administration contributes to the defeat of the Russian Federation in the war that the US administration has been waging against Russia since the beginning of the XNUMXth century.
  8. Mentat
    Mentat 27 December 2017 19: 54 New
    0
    Quote: iouris
    Cooperation with the US administration contributes to the defeat of the Russian Federation in the war that the US administration has been waging against Russia since the beginning of the XNUMXth century.

    Are you a strategic genius to understand what contributes to, and even more so to make such statements?
    Russia does not cooperate with the US administration, but with the US geopolitical entity in the first place. The United States will not go anywhere in the near future and the issues of contact and this very cooperation on some urgent issues must inevitably be resolved, because planet Earth is round.