The United States refused to conduct intelligence activities in the SAR, together with Russia

The US military refused the offer of the Russian Defense Ministry to conduct joint intelligence activities in Syria, reports Interfax report of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov.

Our proposals on the organization of joint planning, reconnaissance, the destruction of terrorists, stumbled upon misunderstanding, refusal ... We didn’t see their desire to interact,

said Gerasimov in an interview with the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda.

He noted that "joint planning, striking, conducting operations would be of great benefit."

Recall that the Russian military operation in Syria has been carried out since September 30, 2015. Aviation The Russian Aerospace Forces supports ground operations of the Syrian army. Russia in Syria has an air base at the Khmeimim airport and a naval base in Tartus. 48 Russian troops passed through Syria.

At the end of November, Gerasimov said that after the reduction of the grouping in Syria, there would remain a reconciliation center, two bases and "a number of structures necessary to maintain this situation, which has now been established."

Comments

[Shura Perm]

They are recruiting, we are destroying, in these circumstances we can’t see friendship, we are on opposite sides of the barricades

[Jedi]

Our proposals for organizing joint planning, conducting reconnaissance, and eliminating terrorists came across a misunderstanding, a refusal ... We did not see their desire to interact

The bolt is clear - they will merge Old on their own pupils. But collaboration also involves the exchange of intelligence. And it will immediately become clear who is fighting, and who is getting out of attack. Although everything is clear to everyone.

[figwam]

US military rejects RF Ministry of Defense proposal to conduct joint intelligence activities in Syria

It’s hard to carry joint activities with the Yankees when you are on the other side of the front line.

[Jedi]

Therefore, one should not even begin. I suspect that the proposal for joint intelligence was made because the US response was known in advance. But now there is a fact of failure. Usually the United States does this, but not this time. Have you been ahead of the curve?

[dorz]

... refused to conduct intelligence activities in the SAR together with Russia

Just as they refused a week ago to exchange letters of guarantee of non-interference in each other's internal affairs. The Americans are going to kill us, and not cooperate with Russia.

[Jedi]

Quote: dorz

The Americans are going to kill us, and not cooperate with Russia.

Tough but true! Taking off my hat

[x.andvlad]

Our proposals for organizing joint planning, reconnaissance, and the destruction of terrorists came across a misunderstanding, a refusal ...
What's so surprising? The Americans and I have almost completely different definitions of terrorists.
In the end, stop begging them for interaction. We sometimes start to look like Cat Leopold.

[Warrior with machine gun]

refuse, so let them get out of there to their puddle, especially since they have no reason to be in Syria, because you can calibrate amertz tourists in those parts.

[Jedi]

Eugene, hello! They just don’t want to get out and they don’t care that they have no legal reason to be in Syria. But they have not written laws - they are "exceptional".

Quote: Warrior with machine gun

otherwise tourists can be calibrated in those parts of the world

Not only possible, but necessary. I am sure that I am not the only one to think so.

[Warrior with machine gun]

I’m talking about this, if direct speech, established laws and treaties do not work, it is necessary to exclude the "exceptional" from the lists of living earthlings (they have no problem with this when they need to bury someone) so that dogs need to be shown that lawless people do not live long (remember at least Aloizycha)

[jolly deckhand]

They are consistent. We have never been called partners. Not that we ...

[Sergey53]

You are right about the sequence. They spend it, if you look closely, in everything. Quality by the way is very valuable.

[Tatyana]

jolly deckhand
They are consistent. We have never been called partners. Not that we ...

Sergey
You are right about the sequence. They spend it, if you look closely, in everything.

This was also said by Stalin.

[Masya masya]

We did not see their desire to interact,

where does desire and understanding come from? when do we destroy their child?

[Sergey53]

It is generally necessary for them to make a no-fly zone.

[bratchanin3]

It is natural how it can be collaborated with americas if the goals and objectives are different. It's time to prepare for the expulsion of the United States from the territory of the SAR, and not talk about cooperation. It's time to stop cheating yourself.

[Mentat]

Quote: jolly deckhand

They are consistent. We have never been called partners. Not that we ...

Consistently and insinuatingly, you are itching here on the site, trying to impose on your visitors a certain impression of the continuous mistakes of the Russian leadership. Are you just a senior citizen who itches in one place or would you be worth it for a scruff and a clove?

Meanwhile, the word “partnership” as well as “partner” appears in NATO official documents (https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_5009
0.htm), in official EU documents (http://eeas.europa.eu/russia/docs/2011_eu-russia
_leaflet_en.pdf), in the US press (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/opinion/the-r
ussia-us-partnership-driven-to-a-new-low.html; http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-skeptics/ame
ricas-russia-dilemma-big-problem-or-potential-par
tner-17941; https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/syria/201
7-11-23 / russias-questionable-counterterrorism-rec
ord), in statements by US senior management (Donald Trump Tweets About Russian Cyber ​​Security Partnership), and business (e.g. http://www.russiapartners.ru/firm-profile-ru/)
The Russian leadership simply invariably emphasizes the fact that the common ground, for example in the security sphere, has always been and is, which is almost inevitable for the two strongest world powers.
Therefore, you are simply a bullshit, frankly speaking.

[iouris]

Cooperation with the US administration contributes to the defeat of the Russian Federation in the war that the US administration has been waging against Russia since the beginning of the XNUMXth century.

[Mentat]

Quote: iouris

Cooperation with the US administration contributes to the defeat of the Russian Federation in the war that the US administration has been waging against Russia since the beginning of the XNUMXth century.

Are you a strategic genius to understand what contributes to, and even more so to make such statements?
Russia does not cooperate with the US administration, but with the US geopolitical entity in the first place. The United States will not go anywhere in the near future and the issues of contact and this very cooperation on some urgent issues must inevitably be resolved, because planet Earth is round.