Heavy Israeli armored vehicle "Ahzarit"

45
In 1988, a mass production of the Akhzarit Mk1 heavy armored personnel carrier (from Hebrew Zhestokaya), created on the basis of Soviet-era captured from Arab countries, began in Israel at a plant in Tel Hashomer. tanks T-54 and T-55. Work on the creation of a heavy armored personnel carrier was carried out in the Jewish state for a long time. The nature of hostilities in this region implies a high saturation of the battlefield with weapons of destruction of 12,7 and 14,5 mm caliber, as well as various RPGs, which are often used by Arab militants in urban battles. According to the design of Israeli designers, “Ahzarit” is intended for joint use in combat conditions with Merkava tanks, as well as for special operations. Currently, 400 to 500 captured Arab tanks have been converted into armored personnel carriers.

Prerequisites for the creation of a heavy, well-armored armored personnel carrier appeared after the Lebanese War 1982, when losses among the personnel of the mechanized units, mostly equipped with the American MXXUMX armored personnel carriers, turned out to be very significant. Analysis of combat experience led to quite unexpected conclusions - the armored personnel carrier must have protection that exceeds the protection of the tank. The Israel Defense Forces are very sensitive to casualties, so the existing M113 BTR has completely ceased to organize the military.

The Israeli military wanted to get into service both an assault vehicle and an infantry carrier. Initially, they worked out the option of creating such a machine in the hull of the Merkava tank, but there was a much simpler solution. Since 1967, the Arabs "put" Israel hundreds of tanks T-54 / 55. After repairs and modernization, most of them were put into service with the army under the designations "Tyrant-4" and "Tyrant-5". It was their corps that was finally decided to put into production of heavy tracked armored personnel carriers, so the Akhzarit car was born.
Heavy Israeli armored vehicle "Ahzarit"

Layout of the Akhzarit armored personnel carrier

The layout of the heavy armored personnel carrier provides for the location of the control compartment in front of the machine. The person’s 3 is located in the forward part of the hull: the driver is on the left, the gunner is in the center, the car’s commander is on the right. The seats of all three can be raised for a better view on the march. To monitor the road, the driver has an 4 periscopic observation device. In the middle part of the hull of the Akhzarit armored personnel carrier there is a troop compartment with a capacity for 7 people. Three paratroopers sit along the sides. From the left side on the bench, from the right on the folding seats, another place is located at the aft bulkhead of the compartment. There are 6 prism blocks (4 on the right and 2 on the left) in the landing compartment roof. In the stern of the BTR is the engine compartment.

The transmission and engine were replaced by a new power unit created by NIMDA and consisting of a 8-cylinder two-stroke diesel engine of water cooling “Detroit Diesel” 8V-71TTA developing power in 650 hp. by General Motors and hydraulic transmission XTG-411-4 from Allison. The engine in the body of the BTR installed across. The engine radiator blinds come back, the exhaust pipe to the left side.

The characteristic feature of the Akhzarit armored personnel carrier can be attributed to the entrance (exit) hatch for the landing party, which is located in the rear of the hull from the starboard side. This hatch is a narrow flip-up ramp and a cover with taper-type walls rising up above the machine body, the hatch has a hydraulic drive. Due to the compactness of the engine mounted on the vehicle, the output from the infantry unit was able to be placed in the rear of the hull, which is typical of many models of infantry fighting vehicles in various countries. In addition, the fodder arrangement of MTO allowed to balance the installation of enhanced armor in front of the machine.

Due to the use of powerful spaced-type armor (in-house development), the combat mass of the armored vehicle is almost 44 tons, while in the T-54 / 55 tank this mass with a turret reaches 36 tons. Compared with the Soviet tank, the overall width of the vehicle was increased by 370 mm and is 3640 mm. Thanks to this, it was possible to provide a greater level of body armor, and the machine's durability was increased due to the low silhouette (on the roof of the case around 2000 mm). Around the fighting compartment is a heavier reservation, and a number of armor plates, which are installed behind the hull and along the sides, have a perforated shape. The undercarriage of the Akhzarit armored personnel carrier is covered by additional anti-cumulative screens. All seats of the crew and members of the landing are equipped with hatches in the roof of the hull.

In the process of production and operation, a new version of the armored personnel carrier was mastered, called the Akhzarit Mk2. This version differs from the basic new power unit consisting of the Allison hydromechanical transmission XTG-411-5 and the more powerful Detroit Diesel engine 8V-92TA (850 hp). These changes made it possible to increase the pick-up and power density of the armored personnel carrier.

Armament of Akhzarit armored personnel carrier

Armament machine is designed to defeat enemy personnel, and not lightly armored targets, as in most modern infantry fighting vehicles. According to the developed tactical concept, the Akhzarit armored personnel carrier should be used together with tanks, which are fully entrusted with the task of fighting enemy armored vehicles. The role of the heavy Akhzarit armored personnel carrier comes down to transporting infantry through the enemy’s zone without casualties. The basis of the machine’s weapon system is the OWS module. Module weight is 160 kg. while almost all of its design is outside the booked volume of the case. The 7,62-mm machine gun FN М240 is installed on this module regularly. Shooting from it is possible both remotely with the arrow closed and in manual mode. In case of remote control of a machine gun, the shooter uses an optical sight without magnification for guidance (angle of field of view 25 degrees) In addition to the main 1-multiple sight, there is a sight with 8-magnification, having a range scale. Both sights have night vision channels.

On the first materials on this BTR, publicly published by NIMDA, Akhzarit vehicles were shown, each with an OWS 3 module. However, in real conditions, the Israel Defense Forces are armed with machines that are mounted only on the 1 OWS module. At the same time on conventional pin turrets, you can install three more 7.62-mm machine guns М240. Additionally, “Ahzarit” is armed with at least one small mortar caliber 60 mm. Its ammunition includes fragmentation, lighting and smoke ammunition.

In front of the BTR hull, in small niches on both sides of the hull, there are blocks of smoke grenade launchers CL-3030 (6 each) from IMI (Israel Military Industries). The same installation applies to the Israeli MBT. Grenade launchers can use several types of smoke grenades of national production. In addition, the possibility of creating a smoke screen by injecting fuel into the exhaust pipe is provided.

In contrast to its modern foreign counterparts, there is no turret with a cannon or a heavy machine gun on this machine. The reason for this is the priority, which, in the design of the Akhzarit BTR, was given to the safety of transporting an infantry assault force to the point it needs to carry out the tasks that it can successfully solve by dismounting. In turn, the acquisition of the machine with a cannon or other heavy weaponry would draw it into the solution of combat missions, which put the crew and landing forces at additional risk.

Security Akhzarit armored personnel carrier

According to the conclusion of foreign experts, the heavy tracked armored personnel carrier "Akhzarit" is a perfectly protected means of transporting an infantry assault force on the battlefield, while at the same time providing it with secretive dismounting. This armored personnel carrier has a high level of body armor protection and a low silhouette, which together provides the landing force and crew with a high survival rate on the battlefield, protecting people from modern means of destruction, as well as providing soldiers with the opportunity to act in contaminated areas.

At present, the Akhzarit is the most protected mass-produced combat vehicle designed to transport infantry. His armor provides protection against both cumulative and sub-caliber ammunition, including RPG shots. The mass in 44 tons for an infantry armored personnel carrier is unprecedented (for example, the BTR-80 weighs 13,6 tons). In fact, 14 tons of heavy armored personnel carrier accounted for his armor. This one figure already characterizes the level of security of the machine. In the best way, the BTR is protected from shelling in the frontal projection, where a reservation similar to the composite armor of the Merkava-3 tank is used.

In the design of the Akhzarit BTR, the principle of protecting more important units and components with less important ones is implemented. On the sides of the fighting compartment of the armored personnel carrier are fuel tanks, which serve as additional protection for the landing force. The stern parts of the sides are covered with special perforated armor plates. In the left rear of the machine is a massive power unit. The machine has an individual protection complex against weapons mass destruction and automatic fire extinguishing system.

Exploitation

The Israeli army’s motorized rifle battalion is armed with the Akhzarit 36 heavy armored personnel carriers, plus one additional command and command vehicle. There is no OWS module on the commander’s armored personnel carrier, but additional radio equipment is mounted. Also, the battalion additionally includes 4 tracked MPZ tracked armored personnel carriers in a repair platoon. The first data armored personnel carriers received an elite brigade "Golani".

Judging by the exercises held in Israel, the armored personnel carriers are used mainly by groups of 3 vehicles. The landing leaves them on the move. The advancement to the object is carried out using the folds of the terrain, with the two machines marching in front, the third is at some distance behind. After the landing, the Akhzarit armored personnel carrier continues to move forward, but at a very low speed. Despite the rather narrow manhole, the troops leave the car rather quickly. During the live landing of an assault force from an armored personnel carrier it resembles a landing of an assault force from an airplane. The disadvantage of the machine can be considered the fact that one of the wings of the landing hatch is thrown upwards, which allows the enemy to accurately determine the moment of leaving the vehicle for the infantry.

Sources used:
www.alternathistory.org.ua/tyazhelyi-bronetransporter-akhzarit-izrail
www.otvaga2004.narod.ru/otvaga2004/armour-asia/arm-isr_achz.htm
www.btvt.narod.ru/4/achzarit/achzarit.htm
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 10 2012 08: 48
    Particular attention in the Israeli army is paid to the preservation of personnel ... you can not read further ... plus ... a cool little thing ... perhaps you won’t even get out of my beloved RPG-7 ...
    1. Perch_xnumx
      +1
      April 10 2012 09: 56
      If you hang a set of dynamic protection. Put serial emphasize the Israeli arena. No GHGs and RPGs will be scary. And a bit to force the engine. And ours - stupidly blew up their equipment in the early 90's.
      1. teves
        -2
        April 10 2012 19: 51
        Somehow on this site, I saw wildly laughable patriotic users of the Israeli military-industrial complex ... And now the question is: how did the 6 millionth Israel think of the Soviet tanks seized from the Arabs to make the most secure vehicle for its own infantry today? , and the greatest USSR in the world and subsequently Russia, which stamped these same tanks more than anyone in the world taken, somehow to put it mildly lag behind in this matter? .... laughing What is it?
        1. -2
          April 10 2012 20: 23
          Well, here you are obviously not far from the truth ... I also think that our Jews are dumber than those in Israel ... plus ..
          1. -3
            April 10 2012 21: 40
            Quote: ward
            and the greatest USSR in the world

            It's all about the concept of warfare. With such heavy BMPs to the English Channel on the 5-th day you will not come out.
            1. -1
              April 10 2012 22: 05
              Well, there is a certain reason for this ...
            2. Curaki
              -1
              25 May 2014 17: 22
              that’s the difference between Jews and Russian Jews, they don’t touch anyone and develop their own country only they defend themselves and the Russians want to hack everything and as a result they chew much worse than the Jews) Well, why do you need that lamb? Sit at home chew and be rude that the cripple atom is not up to the lamb wanted to reach.
  2. +4
    April 10 2012 08: 52
    But I like the technical solution for the ramp to exit from behind.
    1. 0
      April 10 2012 10: 56
      For what they zamusnuyut interesting, because the roof on the ramp rises, so that a Jewish fighter could dismount in full growth. lol
  3. grizzlir
    +4
    April 10 2012 09: 34
    Machines of this type must necessarily be in the Russian army, along with the classic infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers. Often there are tasks when it is necessary to deliver or evacuate an assault force under enemy fire, in such cases, such machines are simply not replaceable.
    For example, the only seventy-second that we lost in the second war in Grozny was destroyed by militants just during the evacuation of wounded fighters. The tank closed the infantry on board. If the tank fired and the evacuation was carried out on a heavy armored personnel carrier, the situation would be completely different
    1. +2
      April 10 2012 15: 32
      We have developed and offered for a long time (including for export) about the same car on the same base (in order to dispose of extra tanks, as an option). It was 15 years or more in magazines and TV. Well, the Jews do not waste anything , apparently .... However, during the Second World War, even our "Panthers" were used, and the Germans found our trophy equipment in various ways winked
      1. +5
        April 10 2012 15: 40
        We have long developed and offered (including for export) about the same car on the same base (in the order of disposal of excess tanks, as an option)


        1. karlo
          0
          April 10 2012 22: 00
          Quote: professor
          We have long developed and offered (including for export) about the same car on the same base (in the order of disposal of excess tanks, as an option)

          The photos are interesting, only how the compartment is landing? Is it crawling from the rear hatches? Or in the front under the tracks?
          1. -4
            April 10 2012 22: 31
            That's the flaw.
        2. -2
          April 11 2012 11: 15
          Danke for cool pics, Kamrad Prof! drinks laughing
  4. vylvyn
    +11
    April 10 2012 10: 12
    This article should be presented to all MOs.
    A statement was recently published by the head of the Russian armored forces (I don’t remember the exact position) - a young major general (about 40 years old) with a surname ending with the letter O (the person also looked like this letter) - who from the high rostrum announced the disposal of our T-55 ... 72. He reassured the media that nothing useful could be done from this technique.
    It’s strange. But Israel has found application of this technique. And not just stupidly revived her, but made a new class of armored personnel carriers (or infantry fighting vehicles - as you like).
    Well, as for the disposal of our equipment, then it is not the equipment that needs to be disposed of, but the generals. And the media can be reassured by the fact that nothing useful can be done with them and nothing useful can be expected from them.
    1. +2
      April 10 2012 11: 09
      No need to take closely everything that our generals say. Disposal is not such a cheap event. Look at the factories in the mountains. So we have the right move now bringing the old to the level of the new and creating the newest.
  5. +7
    April 10 2012 10: 18
    What Russia has, Ukraine has a huge fleet of obsolete tanks starting from T-55
    so here is their future, not martin.
    1. Curaki
      0
      25 May 2014 17: 24
      In my opinion, the Kharkov Tank Plant created such a thing. How did you get it? Just do not remember the name (
  6. +9
    April 10 2012 10: 28
    I will share photos with military photos:






















    1. Dust
      -2
      April 10 2012 12: 17
      Pictures are beautiful while they act against the partisans! They won’t line up against a normal opponent ...
      1. 755962
        +2
        April 10 2012 14: 45
        Professor, question. Does the entrance and exit from the rear ramp not make it difficult to unload with full combat equipment? In my view, it is too compact in height and width. Photos are class (what is the place, in the background of the mosque?)
        1. +5
          April 10 2012 14: 54
          Entrance-exit from the rear ramp will not complicate unloading with full combat equipment?

          It does not complicate, there is enough space, especially there is no need to climb.




          what is the place amid the mosque?

          Berlin laughing (Just kidding, judging by the landscape it’s Gaza).
          1. 755962
            0
            April 10 2012 15: 23
            Quote: professor
            Kidding

            Respect ... Great Albert Einstein was a noble joker tongue .When will the material on the army buggy?
      2. wars1991
        -1
        April 11 2012 16: 32
        And where did you see the battle order in the pictures ???
    2. +1
      April 10 2012 16: 04
      all these bmps didn’t impress me as much as these bulldozers in the third photo, here are power.
      1. -3
        April 10 2012 22: 29
        Powerful stuff, to be honest. Affectionately called "Dubi" - a bear cub. Reduces losses greatly. Although slow, contagions.
        1. wars1991
          0
          April 11 2012 16: 34
          The army is usually called Di Knight ... There are various modifications that differ, including armor and weapons ...
    3. Dust
      0
      April 10 2012 17: 15
      I never could understand - what is the meaning of these strange bags on the helmets of soldiers?
      1. +1
        April 10 2012 17: 23
        This crap on their head is a means of camouflage, such as from a distance, round objects, such as a head in a helmet, are hidden first, and this crap makes the helmet invisible, in other words, the eye does not cling
      2. -3
        April 10 2012 22: 28
        Breaking the contour.
        1. 0
          April 13 2012 01: 00
          Pimply I’m not talking about anything.
      3. wars1991
        -1
        April 11 2012 16: 37
        in addition to breaking the contour (there are no such rounded shapes on the ground) it also covers the face-neck from the scorching sun
    4. Insurgent
      0
      April 10 2012 20: 05
      He would have a heavy machine gun
      1. wars1991
        0
        April 10 2012 21: 07
        If necessary, not only a large-caliber machine gun is installed on it ... On one of the pictures posted by the professor above, the installed SAMSON module is visible ... And usually a 7,62 MAG machine gun ...
      2. +3
        April 10 2012 21: 14
        why not a machine gun?


        here's another ramp
  7. +6
    April 10 2012 11: 06
    54 and 55 unkillable vehicles. In '93, in Poti, we tried to take out one of us, when the crew escaped. they beat it with a fly, it’s off, a grenade was thrown into the tower, it’s off. In short, they opened the MTO and a grenade under the engine. One fic did not catch fire, but also did not shoot anymore. By the way, Brad Pete bought himself such a machine.
  8. dred
    -2
    April 10 2012 11: 47
    We even have operating time BMP so why not take into service.
    1. -1
      April 10 2012 15: 39
      It is possible - they will accept. There are many different conversations - but completely, like, the idea was not destroyed
  9. Dust
    +1
    April 10 2012 12: 18
    As a way to dispose of obsolete armored vehicles - I fully and fully support what I did Ukrainians like a lot more!
  10. Mesniy
    +2
    April 10 2012 13: 34
    "Since 1967, the Arabs have supplied hundreds of T-54/55 tanks to Israel."
    Respect to the author! Smiled! It’s not for nothing that the Soviet gunsmiths plowed.
  11. +1
    April 10 2012 13: 36
    Yes, there is a reason to invent something like that when the "suppliers" do not fail.
  12. M_I_T_YA_89
    +2
    April 10 2012 14: 08
    An interesting restructuring, from tanks to armored personnel carriers.
    As for the destruction of tanks, and not modernization, a person begins to think when there is a real threat to his life, in the case of Israel.
    1. wars1991
      0
      April 10 2012 21: 12
      Today, not only Israelis have armored personnel carriers of the armored personnel carriers / BMPs, but also Jordan, South Africa (rework from the Centurions). In Israel, the first armored personnel carriers of the tanks were also based on the Centurion ... These are Nagmakhon, Nakpadon and Puma .. . Her photo is also posted above ...
  13. public
    -4
    April 10 2012 20: 01
    this machine is good for theater of war in Israel and its surrounding countries. not possessing good maneuverability, he is called upon to protect the landing forces. for counterguerrilla fighting is good for large-scale operations bad. weight 44 tons. for the transfer of a slightly more or less suitable regiment with merkava and BTR data, such a number of sorties will be required. But how much fuel is needed to refuel these monsters and tanks? and evacuation will be a difficult question. Yes, and no one canceled anti-mines. and it’s easy to hit PTR from above.
    1. karlo
      +3
      April 10 2012 20: 45
      Quote: bublic
      this machine is good for theater of war in Israel and its surrounding countries

      Absolutely, we are not going to conquer Europe, America, Russia and Antarctica. Ahzarit and Merkava are intended exclusively for our theater. They absolutely suit us and notice Akhzarits go as pril accompanied by tanks. The bulldozer goes first and removes the topsoil along with mines (punches the axis - in translation from Ivitita) Now bulldozers are already fully radio-controlled. Again, to save the lives of soldiers.
      Quote: bublic
      for the transfer of a little more or less suitable regiment with merkava and BTR data, such a number of sorties will be required

      The question is where is the flight. We have the whole country 500km long and in the narrowest place 14km. What kind of planes - they carry on trailers.
      Quote: bublic
      But how much fuel is needed to refuel these monsters and tanks?

      What does fuel matter? The main thing is that the soldiers should be alive.

      Quote: bublic
      and it’s easy to hit PTR from above.

      Will compose, Ahzarit is intended for battles in us. points. It has the same top reservation.
    2. +1
      April 10 2012 20: 55
      Have you read the article carefully? Akhzarit was created on the basis of the T-55, and it is known, in turn, was created not only for the wars in the Middle East. The BMP has become heavier than its predecessor, but the engine is more powerful there, a more advanced transmission and chassis have been reinforced. So why is this BMP suitable only for the "local theater of operations"? Because they don't ride armor?
      1. karlo
        +2
        April 10 2012 21: 53
        Quote: professor
        So why is this BMP suitable only for the "local theater of operations"? Because they don't ride armor?

        I argued that it was created under the local theater in the first place, of course, that at any other point in the world he can fight the same. But soil weight, distance. and the concept of many armies of other countries does not agree to invest huge resources to protect a simple infantry squad. I believe that it is wonderful for combat in settlements. But then again (we have) good roads, mostly rocky soils and small distances. Take for example Russia. Which bridge in the outback will withstand 44 tons, and after passing the Akhzaritov column along the lane, you can forget about the road.
        Well, as for riding on armor, it’s a great success for patriots yelling about the best Russian armored personnel carriers in the world. But the truth is that the soldiers somehow desperately do not want to sit in them, preferring to ride on top under bullets like on a cart. With us, I somehow did not see a soldier on the armor from above.
    3. wars1991
      -1
      April 10 2012 21: 15
      And what is new in the Russian army now? Transfer of heavy equipment (tanks) by aviation ???)))
    4. karlo
      0
      April 10 2012 22: 17
      Quote: bublic
      bad for large-scale operations

      Large-scale is how? How under the prokhorovka 300 tanks? Wars have changed and the appearance of local conflicts has prevailed. There are few places to see armored tanks and thousands of infantry support (except for the war in Iraq) But for all that, armored protection for all American armored personnel carriers is being issued in Israel. And they adopted the concept of heavy armored personnel carriers from us.
      The development of armor and protection concepts for: M1126 Stryker was also developed in Israel.
      The Israeli company Palsan Sasa will supply the US Marine Corps with means of protection against terrorist attacks. The US $ 100 million deal was signed by Armor Holdings. Palsan Sasa, which is owned by Kibbutz Sasa located in the vicinity of Mount Merom, will supply the US Marine Corps with means of defense against terrorist attacks. The contract, estimated at $ 100 million, was signed by Armor Holdings from the American side.
      The equipment, which will be supplied under the contract by the Israeli company, will be used to protect the vehicles used by the American Marins. All protective equipment will be modular, that is, if necessary, it will be possible to mount and dismantle them practically in the field.
    5. -2
      April 10 2012 22: 27
      Laugh? What about maneuverability? The speed of the order of 50 km / h, with such tanks go. And what kind of air travel ??? And for other equipment, fuel is not needed, it goes in the holy spirit.

      Explain, in general, what do you see as an alternative?
    6. wars1991
      -2
      April 11 2012 16: 41
      And who said that this machine does not have maneuverability ??? A very maneuverable device. Can you take my word for it ... and much more economically in fuel consumption than the original tank ...
  14. 16
    16
    0
    April 10 2012 21: 30
    damn !!!!!! always surprised and will surprise ---------- Russian idea ----- and we can not realize it in the normal direction, so to speak !!!
  15. valery dv
    0
    April 10 2012 21: 40
    Normal human reviews. I want to make you a Compliment. You are no worse and no more stupid than Europeans, Americans, etc. It’s not for nothing that a huge number of Russians work in Silicon Valley, and your armament is not bad at all. You would only have to teach others to respect people, and not think that are the best on earth.
    1. +2
      April 11 2012 10: 56
      that you are something valery. we do not pretend. the best on earth are Americans.
  16. M. Peter
    0
    12 May 2012 17: 58
    Quote: vorobey
    who from a high rostrum announced the disposal of our T-55 ... 72. He reassured the media that nothing useful could be done from this technique.


    Could of the old T-72 BMPT do. We would have such a car oh how would it not hurt.
    1. Curaki
      0
      25 May 2014 17: 26
      it is non-transportable by plane (silt 76 cannot translate such a miracle a toy.
  17. 0
    April 5 2015 10: 43
    the very concept of heavy armored personnel carriers is correct.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"