Military Review

Without the right to coexist

89



The transition from a unipolar world to a multipolar world or as an alternative to a depolarized one is accompanied by an increase in global military-political instability, an increase in general tension. The old rules are dying off, and the new ones have not yet been worked out, if at all possible.

In 1991, the socialist system failed, which was not at all predetermined. What caused the death of the Soviet Union and why did conscious collapse turn out to be possible here and not in the enemy camp? The answer should be sought in the peculiarities of the capitalist system, the basis of which was and remains the Anglo-American core - the antagonist of Russia over the past two hundred years.

At one time, Andrei Fursov correctly noted that in the course of evolution, the capitalist system had one fundamental advantage over its competitors, namely its elite. More than four hundred years history it has maintained continuity, having gone through countless internal conflicts, which ultimately made it only stronger. The capitalist system is by its nature expansive and extensive, its existence is tied to the need to absorb new markets, it is global in nature and does not tolerate competitors. And if the basis of the system is based on the principle of infinite expansion, then this automatically means that it is fundamentally incompatible with any other - all the rest should be dismantled and trapped. The last such act of expansion was 1991 a year when, with the final collapse of the socialist camp and the USSR, the capitalist system made another and last spurt, capturing markets that were previously inaccessible to it. It was then from the global in nature that it became so in fact.

The Soviet model, potentially also global, was a viable alternative to capitalism, but unfortunately for us, that part of the party nomenclature that did not intend to move from anti-capitalism to post-capitalism won over it and tried to establish physical guarantees for itself and then social survival. The result of these actions was its transformation from a quasi-class into real owners, which happened with the liquidation of the USSR, since this phase transition was impossible without dismantling the entire Soviet system.

The turning point came at the turn of 50 – 60-s, after which the Soviet Union had no chance of eliminating the main enemy in the person of the United States and their stellites, except for the unlikely scenario of a full-scale thermonuclear conflict in which there could be no winners at all. However, what is the reason?

What is one West

Until the 20th century, the masters of the world followed the policy of colonialism, exercising direct control over the natives in one or another part of the world, in which the British were particularly successful, expanding their empire to 40 million square kilometers. With the development of technology, including logistics and the information and communication sphere, capitalism has shifted to another, more effective form of management - control over states, peoples and their policies through offshore zones, where the target elite of the country transferred its assets “hard work”, through the control of the psychosphere of real and potential victims of aggression with the implantation of Western values ​​using geocultural warfare methods. Thus, desubjecting and de-sovereignization of countries and even entire regions took place. It is the consensus around the principle of total robbery and control over the rest of the planet that underlies such a high resilience of the western, first of all Anglo-American, elite. Nowhere, no one has ever achieved such a complete unanimity of this kind at a fundamental level, except in the only global social system - the capitalist one. Of course, there were and remain contradictions within it, but they are associated with the redistribution of resources, control over information and financial flows, the struggle for spheres of influence and a higher position in the hierarchy, but not with the most important aspect - the robbery of the rest to preserve the dominant status.

Russia - the second role

The Soviet system was initially based on a completely different principle - justice and our country had the potential to become a substitute for the unjust world order that the capitalist system generated around itself. However, after the death of Stalin, there was an ugly deformation in the development, began to tilt towards cost accounting, decomposition and strategy of convergence, voiced by Yuri Andropov. The Secretary General was wrong: capitalism cannot exist without expansion and subordination of the rest of the world, and therefore, the principle of coexistence with any other system is unacceptable for it. Actually, therefore, despite all the successes of the Soviet intelligence services, after the 50s, we were unable to exert a destructive impact on the US and the Western system as such through recruiting agents inside it. The stability of the capitalist elite gave it the opportunity to impose its values ​​on part of the Soviet nomenclature, to have an additional corrupting effect, and the domestic counterintelligence and the Party Control Committee were powerless here, since recruitment was carried out at a level where it could not be stopped by operational methods.

In Russia, the lack of continuity of the elite led to the emergence of compensating mechanisms, which were expressed during crisis periods in the appearance of super-leaders, leaders. Peter the Great, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin - all of them mobilized and personal qualities compensated for the lack of a stable elite and its continuity. In tactical terms, such a scheme has advantages, since when the government of the country and the system as a whole is tied to one outstanding person, it is easier to make decisions, the time for coordination between key parts of the elite is reduced. However, from a strategic point of view, this approach has a critical drawback: after the death of the leader, as a rule, he is replaced by a person of a much smaller scale, the control over the elite is weakened, and its parts begin to put forward a consensus figure that is more manageable and does not have such outstanding intellectual and moral-willed qualities like its predecessor. In the case of the Soviet Union, this had tragic consequences - after the death of Stalin, the Communist Party took the path that can be described as rule in the absence of responsibility. Under Khrushchev, by strengthening the control over the army and prohibiting the State Security Committee to collect dirt on the highest party and trade union leaders, a guarantee was reached of the physical survival of the nomenclature, and under Brezhnev by eliminating vertical mobility — and social. Which largely led the elite to degradation with an inadequate response to challenges — sometimes simply for physiological reasons, since the Politburo was aging in the absence of an effective mechanism for personnel renewal. By the way, the CPC has learned a lesson from the Soviet past and does not allow, at least for now, to the highest party and state positions, persons older than 67 years, with the observance of rotation as one of the most important mechanisms preventing the degradation of the leadership and the party as a whole.

From the above conclusion: after 1991, Russia became a part of the capitalist system and, therefore, cannot be completely subjective and sovereign. But capitalism as such is absolutely alien to our country and will never take root here. The entire post-Soviet elite is completely comprador, if we consider it not as a multitude of individuals, among which there are exceptions, but as a system. But in capitalism we are doomed - without our project, image of the future. In the current system, we are only a raw materials appendage of the West, led by the court propagandists no matter what the official media say. Only our own development vector, which is fundamentally different from the road to nowhere that Russia has been going through over the past 26 years, can give us a chance. But the global capitalist system, as we have already found out, does not tolerate an alternative. So it was in Soviet times, and so it will be, until it is dismantled.

Fetish of common values

Any social subject that has set a goal to take a path that is different from the capitalist one inevitably faces an extremely aggressive reaction, even if the alternative is ephemeral. Any processes that are not consistent with the current world order, instantly fall under the coordinated attack of the Western media and politicians, and, if necessary, under the direct aggression. This was the case with the “Islamic State” (forbidden in Russia), which, despite its medieval cruelty, cannot be compared with the threat posed by Anglo-American foreign policy. Listing someone as a terrorist, London and Washington use double standards, since their own actions can often also be described as state terrorism. The judge in the role of the West is far worse than those he judges.

Not to justify the igilovtsy, but I must admit - they have their own ideology and they are ready to go to the end. This is where the answer to the question lies: why in the Middle East did this group acquire such a high level of subjectivity through extreme radicalization and dissimilarity to the West? The ideologists and builders of the IG understood perfectly that the creation of any social model that is not fundamentally different from the old ones means the preservation of the existing extremely unjust system of the global world order. And in order to get out of it, at the same time having gained sovereignty and subjectivity, it was necessary to create not only a radically different ideology, ideological and value paradigm, but also to go to an uncompromising struggle with an external enemy and, equally important, with ourselves.

The latter implies a fundamental rejection of transactions and compromises with external players, inevitably leading to maximum radicalization, both in terms of strict discipline within their organization, and in opposing opponents. Terror and dictatorship were necessary at the quasi-state stage of the existence of the IG not only to take the code control of the territory and population, but also to prevent even hints at negotiations with the enemies.

Maximum radicalization is inevitable for any social subject that aims to create his own project. Moreover, his characteristic feature should be the dissimilarity of the system, the alternative of which he acts. For example, the IG is characterized by the desacralization of death, when the ideological supporters of the organization declare that they love death as much as their enemies are life and pleasure. Already in this example it is clear that in principle there can be no universal human values. Universal - the same screen, smoke screen, as well as democracy in the Western sense. Through the imposition of this system, the collective recruitment of elites from recalcitrant countries is carried out when they put the embedded values ​​in the first place and unwittingly recognize the primacy of the West as the top of the social evolution of humanity, not realizing that they have fallen into the trap. The consequence is the loss of sovereignty at the level of the top, and then of the whole country, what happened in the post-Soviet countries after the collapse of the USSR.

Only its own path of development will bring the social subject out of the influence of the West with its neo-colonialism. And this automatically means radicalization and complete rejection of the compromise, since the capitalist system will try in any way to prevent the creation of a competitor, up to its physical destruction with simultaneous total discrimination in the media, in order to exclude even the possibility of someone repeating such an experience and adopting an alternative ideology. .
Author:
Originator:
https://vpk-news.ru/articles/40588
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 3 January 2018 06: 26 New
    +4
    "Tell me, American, what is strength? In money? So my brother thinks so .... And I think that strength is in the truth!"
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 3 January 2018 07: 31 New
      12
      In general, the article is correct! Only here are the conclusions either thought out or not voiced to the end. Namely.

      On the one hand, the author correctly writes that the foundation of any sovereign project is its own development path, which is based on its own ideology different from the West - and even cites the emergence of modern ISIS as an example!
      However, the whole question rests on its quality. How long can such an ideology last if it contains methodological errors that make it not reflective of reality? Only temporarily.
      It is noteworthy that in this case no one asks what may be in m / l. the theory that the Communists put into practice contained fundamental methodological errors, which, in the end, led the Soviet people to understand its utopianism, to understand its objective unreliability, because of which it cannot serve as a guide to action.
      Remember how skeptical the Soviet people reacted to the statement of Khrushchev in the 1961 year that supposedly in the 1980 year the Soviet people would live under communism! "
      And why did Andropov and his associates appear on the political horizon, with his ideas of introducing self-financing?
      And remember how students formally studied philosophical disciplines, especially in technical universities! By principle, just to get rid of the philosophical subject.
      In other words. If the state is built on the erroneous, not reflecting the reality, ideological (philosophical) method, then such a state with historical inevitability is doomed to its geopolitical disappearance. And no religion in such a state will ultimately save such a state!
      And in ideological disciplines in Russia now, in terms of methodology, there is a complete collapse - in the sense of the prevalence of Western grant-eating in the field of development of theoretical thought in universities in philosophical disciplines!
      1. dSK
        dSK 3 January 2018 08: 08 New
        +3
        Hello, Tatyana!
        Quote: Tatiana
        in m / l the theory that the Communists brought to life contained fundamental methodological errors, which, in the end, led the Soviet people to understand its utopianism
        God's commandments - a genuine, they are more than 3000 years old, and the "code of the builder of communism" is plagiarism.
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 3 January 2018 08: 31 New
          +8
          Good morning, Sergey!
          dSK
          God's commandments are a true scripture; they are more than 3000 years old, and the "code of the builder of communism" is plagiarism.

          God's commandments are not a scientific method and have no relation to ideological theories with their methods in the sense of methodology!
          God's commandments are a moral code of society for organizing, distributing and protecting property in it, so that society itself (society), due to property redistribution, does not turn into a chaotic world of predators and humanity does not disappear at all.
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 3 January 2018 08: 57 New
            +2
            I’ll clarify more correctly.
            Of the 10 commandments of God in theology, only the first 4 commandments relate to the idealistic method in philosophy, and only the rest 6 relate to the moral code regarding the ordering, distribution and protection of property in society. These 4 commandments have nothing to do with the scientific method in philosophy and in reality they cannot serve as a guide to action for transforming an honest and fair world order.
          2. Evgenijus
            Evgenijus 3 January 2018 10: 25 New
            +2
            Tatyana:
            God's commandments are the moral code of society for organizing, distributing and protecting property in it.

            Tatyana, did you yourself understand what you spoke? If you listen, it turns out that the eggs teach the chicken that laid these eggs. But if directly and in a military way, so you have a mess in your thoughts (I could say more abruptly). You see, God's commandments have nothing to do with the material world, but only treat our aching heads, obsessed with materialism. What is the difference between the Old and New Testaments caught? Read carefully these works ...
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 3 January 2018 11: 46 New
              +2
              Evgenijus
              Tatyana, did you yourself understand that you uttered?
              Of course I got it! I tried to answer Sergey’s comment
              dSK
              God's commandments are a true scripture; they are more than 3000 years old, and the "code of the builder of communism" is plagiarism.
              in his language.
              Evgenijus
              You understand, God's commandments have nothing to do with the material world, they only treat our sick heads, obsessed with materialism.
              Wow "TREATMENT"! And why did you decide that you need to "treat the heads obsessed with materialism", and not the heads obsessed with religion? And why exactly “MIXED”? You yourself understood what you said? I hope not - did not understand.
              At first, when building a society, any desire of people for power is motivated behavior as a desire to organize, distribute and protect property themselves.
              Second. The very concept of ownership (based on a materialist. Solution of the main issue of philosophy in dialectical materialism) does not exist by itself - without its own material carrier. A material carrier of the concept of property are people with their natural biological. and social. needs, with their class. and nat. mentality. Indeed, if there are no people, then there is no concept of ownership. Those. “Ownership” is primarily an ideological concept. It is called upon to form, i.e. educate people’s consciousness in such a way that it matches the prevailing type of histor. production achieved. relationships in society and the nature of traditions, covering relationships in people at home, in the family. Therefore, since the concept of property is an ideological concept, the concept derived from it - the concept of ownership of property - can sometimes be purely illusory. This means that people can be easily deceived in matters of property. An example is a scam with vouchers in the Russian Federation, MMM pyramids, etc. And also the blocking of reserve funds of foreign states in American banks. This is a reserve national fund of Kazakhstan.

              But the subject of "ownership" is always real things. This is primarily material (natural and industrial) values, and then spiritual values, with the help of a cat. people, a nation can not only survive, but also develop, prosper, enjoy life.
              Thus, in general, the concept of property as a category that describes consciousness inevitably reflects all the norms of patrimonial, religious, national and class law, cat. enshrined in society legally and morally. But since the person himself is the material carrier of the concept of property, people in principle in their social behavior can proceed from their purely personal idea, understanding of the concept of property, an alternative to the generally accepted one. And to think not from God at all! Then the ruling classes, the ruling nations have a need for power structures of power, forcing a obstinate person or nat. the stranger will submit to supreme authority. So, in short, there is a need for power and desire for it.
              Speaking of building a multinational. state, it should be noted that every nation, every nation in the process of its historic. formation and development, starting from tribal tribes, created their own ideological. the system of the concept of ownership, expressed, as a rule, in the system of own nat. religious views. Moreover, the greater the religion of the people, the nation historically retained its original tribal egoistic interests, the more aggressive the attitude of this people, this nation towards other peoples and nations regarding the recognition of the right of these other peoples and nations to their share of property in multinational. the state; all the same, representatives of this nation, committed to their religion, are capable of building a multinational community. socially fair state.
              TOTAL Not every nation, not every nation, relying on its religious concept, is able to build a socially just multinational state. Only a secular society based on scientific materialism can do this.
              1. Evgenijus
                Evgenijus 3 January 2018 12: 33 New
                +2
                Tatyana :
                Only a secular society based on scientific materialism can do this.

                Hitler also relied on scientific materialism (Nietzsche Friedrich read? For example, "Anti-Christian" or something else abruptly). That built a secular society in Germany sample 1933 year - try to refute that he had something else. In the US, now a secular society - try to deny it! Just do not forget to add on the bones of which peoples it was created and on whose bones it is now held. You close your ignorance of the history of the world with stupid ciphered phrases from a stupid theory. What is something about Darwin, I remembered, maybe you are his fan? He also raved about theories (a rooster in an egg that had not yet burst) ...
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 3 January 2018 13: 31 New
                  +2
                  And what do you mean by that? What religious wars have not been in history? Or was religion forbidden in Germany? And that Hitler did not build his policy in Germany as a counterbalance to the Jewish realization of his racist ideology in the country and the world? Read carefully Mine Campf! Hitler racially copied a lot of things for the Germans precisely from Judaism - from the Talmud.
                  And who conquered America and created the USA? Also believing people! And then the materialists?
                  Evgenijus
                  You close your ignorance of the history of the world with silly encrypted phrases from a silly theory.
                  The phrases are “encrypted” for you and the theory is “stupid” just because you simply do not understand them. In m / l. theories really have methodological errors that need to be corrected, if only to achieve scientific truth. But the dialectical-materialistic method itself is the most perfect philosophical method, which began to represent the so-called so-called “1986” of the year in the USSR / Russia. "closed scientific technology" for the design and management of society.
                  I remembered something about Darwin, maybe you are his fan?
                  Normally remembered. Darwin's theory of evolution is scientifically sound! But religion is not.
                  1. Evgenijus
                    Evgenijus 3 January 2018 14: 15 New
                    +3
                    Tatyana:
                    ... But religion is not.

                    Why would every year a light be lit on Easter through the prayers of only certain religious denominations? And you have in expressions a generalized concept - "religion". Thought something about this phenomenon in your d \ m method when will be revealed? Never! You have not been given this, for you have an eye, but you do not see, there are ears, but you do not hear.
                    I will say about the conquest of America. Columbus and his subsequent conquistadors were not Orthodox. Do not smear all believers in one crowd with your conquerors. America was created precisely by materialists - robbers. You can not compare them with Russian travelers - that mastered the expanses of Siberia, the Far East, the Far North. They did not kill anyone, unlike your European materialists, but they carried culture to wild nations, and in addition, I say, they were Orthodox.
                    1. Tatyana
                      Tatyana 3 January 2018 14: 59 New
                      +1
                      Evgenijus
                      Why would it every year on Easter the light is lit by the prayers of only certain religious denominations?
                      There was an article in which scientists wrote how it is done. The Lord has nothing to do with it!
                      Columbus and his subsequent conquistadors were not Orthodox. No need to smear all believers in the same crowd with your conquerors.
                      And idealists in philosophy by theological faith are not divided. All one! Therefore, we are talking about believers in general, i.e. about any religious denomination.
                      America was created precisely by materialists - robbers.
                      You can not compare them with Russian travelers - that mastered the vastness of Siberia, the Far East, the Far North. They didn’t kill anyone, unlike YOUR European materialists, but they carried the culture to wild peoples, but in addition I will say - they were Orthodox.

                      First, the science is international. Science is not divided into "your" and "our".
                      Second, the America was conquered by the BELIEVING Europeans-robbers.
                      Then, the d / m method historically did not exist at all. Therefore, do not mix into one heap indiscriminately the alleged "materialists" - the conquerors of America - with the atheistic population of the Soviet period of our country! This is a methodological error, which in logic is called eclecticism.
                      And thirdly, materialist atheists also defended our Soviet Motherland during the Great Patriotic War, and even saved the world from German fascism!
                      1. Evgenijus
                        Evgenijus 3 January 2018 19: 53 New
                        +2
                        Tatyana:
                        There was an article in which scientists wrote how it is done. The Lord has nothing to do with it!

                        Surnames, names of "scientists", their scientific degrees and address of publication. Until you provide an answer to this simple question, I think this is your source of fake on the VO website. Further dispute with you does not make sense.
                    2. Korax71
                      Korax71 3 January 2018 18: 08 New
                      +4
                      It’s interesting, that is, armed Yaitsky Cossacks are direct travelers from God. General Yermolov’s campaign in the Caucasus often carried kind, clean, bright. Although in fact his methods could not be called barbaric, he proceeded from the most effective methods. that Russia grew into territories only because it carried culture. only often broke the way of life again cultivated. Orthodoxy also should not hide behind. Even Orthodoxy in Russia was also born with fire and sword.
                      1. 97110
                        97110 7 January 2018 18: 38 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Korax71
                        even Orthodoxy in Russia was also expected by fire and sword

                        What we see in the historical documents written by the Latins. Documents hundreds of years later of the events described in them, and could not describe baptism as an action carried out by fire and sword, according to the Latin custom native to their authors.
                    3. Tatyana
                      Tatyana 4 January 2018 00: 46 New
                      0
                      Evgenijus Yesterday, 19: 53 ↑
                      Tatyana:
                      There was an article in which scientists wrote how it is done. The Lord has nothing to do with it!
                      Surnames, first names of "scientists", their academic degrees and publication address. Until you provide an answer to this simple question, I consider you to be a source of fake on the VO site.
                      I read the article a long time ago. I found from your memory a similar publication about the nature of the blessed fire according to the hypotheses of scientists.
                      See "Where does the blessed fire come from: hypotheses of scientists" - https://ru.sputnik.md/world_society/20170415/1218
                      9530 / otkuda-beretsya-blagodatnyj-ogon-gipotezy-uc
                      henyx.html
                      Here are excerpts from this article.
                      Scientists talk about a number of methods for obtaining the Holy Fire in temples, known since ancient times


                      The simplest method used by worshipers over the past three hundred years is to mix concentrated sulfuric acid with potassium permanganate powder. When thoroughly mixed, it turns out something like slurry, which is kept in a glass vessel. Part of this slurry is applied with a wooden, ceramic or glass stick to any of the hot objects: it can be a sheet of paper, a piece of cotton or natural fabric, a thin splinter. In contact with them, the object immediately ignites.
                      Chemists have one more scientifically substantiated hypothesis of the Descent of the Holy Fire and why it burns, but does not burn in the first minutes after the descent. Experts say that by mixing boric acid with ethyl alcohol and a drop of concentrated sulfuric acid, a combustible mixture is obtained that is placed under the dome section, which is invisible to the human eye. A thin flaxseed impregnated with a combustible solution, the other end of which is also invisible to pilgrims, is brought to the vessel placed in this way. When a thread is ignited, the solution under the dome flashes in a matter of seconds, and the miracle that the fire does not burn in the first minutes, chemists explain that the burning boric acid ester does not burn, since the process of burning this chemical element occurs at a low temperature . When the boric acid ester burns out, ethanol burns behind it, which, of course, is already starting to burn.
                      Read more in the same place: https://ru.sputnik.md/world_society/20170415/1218
                      9530 / otkuda-beretsya-blagodatnyj-ogon-gipotezy-uc
                      henyx.html
                      1. Evgenijus
                        Evgenijus 4 January 2018 09: 36 New
                        0
                        Tatyana :
                        Chemists have one more scientific hypothesis of the descent of the Holy Fire

                        Hypotheses, hypotheses ... Where is your scientific approach, where are the facts? What are the names of your charlatans and shamans from science? We continue to fake do? Here I also have a hypothesis - have you not fallen off the moon without wearing a spacesuit?
                        All, do not bother your attention to me. Your links and bullshit did not read and not going to read. In vain contacted ...
                      2. Sverdlov
                        Sverdlov 5 January 2018 19: 05 New
                        +1
                        Mixing manganese with sulfuric acid is speculation, fiction. Both are strong oxidizing agents.
                        And about lighting candles at school, he did experiments: pour manganese (potassium permanganate) to the wick and drip glycerin. After some time, self-ignition occurs. Give it a try. Only glycerin is needed not for hands, but concentrated. If not at home, you can evaporate the pharmacy.
                    4. Tatyana
                      Tatyana 4 January 2018 15: 02 New
                      0
                      And what kind of churchman and his religious denomination will allow scientists to conduct scientific research in the temple and test their hypotheses? And is it really so in the names of scientists matter?
                      Do not be naive!
                      Vaughn, St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg. the churchmen of the Russian Orthodox Church, in fact, were taken away from museum workers and restorers! Now everything will be ruined there, but you think and demand about some secular direct scientific research in some temples there!
                      Well, I say this, so to speak, by the way on the topic of discussion!
                      If you really need surnames and more explanatory explanations on the essence of this issue, then I recommend a more thorough article with links to the primary sources:
                      "Exposure of the" blessed fire "- http://www.ateism.ru/article.htm?no=2182
                      The content of the article.
                      Part 1 - Source of the Holy Fire
                      Orthodox critics of the miraculous appearance of fire.
                      What arguments do critics of the wonderful nature of the appearance of the Holy Fire bring?
                      Version of the skeptics about the appearance of fire.
                      What kind of lamp is this? And what are the revelations associated with it?
                      The most important evidence of the miraculous appearance of fire.
                      Version of the Armenian side.
                      Self-ignition of candles at the pilgrims.
                      Why do not authorities expose?
                      Part 2. Wonderful flashes and unburning fire.
                      Unburning fire.
                      Wonderful flashes.
                      Literature
              2. alexsipin
                alexsipin 5 January 2018 01: 24 New
                +1
                Quote: Tatiana
                Not every nation, not every nation, relying on its religious concept, is able to build a socially just multinational state. Only a secular society based on scientific materialism can do this.

                Moreover, scientific materialism to build a "just multinational state"? There Switzerland built an excellent, just multinational state, and without any invented scientific materialism.
        2. badens1111
          badens1111 3 January 2018 08: 39 New
          +5
          Quote: dsk
          God's commandments are a scripture, they are more than 3000 years old

          And before that, therefore, everyone wildly vegetated and were real beasts?
          Then where does the genius of Phidias and Pythagoras, Archimedes and other Cato come from?
          Do you and us, or rather our ancestors, who committed many deeds before Baptism, write in savages?
          Enough to carry this nonsense about plagiarism and stuff.
          1. Pissarro
            Pissarro 3 January 2018 15: 06 New
            +1
            All of the individuals you have listed lived after the commandments appeared, less than 3000 years ago
            1. Pancir026
              Pancir026 3 January 2018 22: 14 New
              0
              Quote: Pissarro
              All of the individuals you have listed lived after the commandments appeared, less than 3000 years ago

              All these personalities lived BEFORE your commandments.
              Archimedes (Ἀρχιμήδης; 287 BC - 212 BC)
              Phidias was born shortly after the Battle of Marathon, around 490 BC in Athens.
              Pythagoras (576 - 496 BC)
              Ancient Greek thinker, religious and political figure.
              Arch Portsion Cato (lat. Marcus Porcius Cato, for the difference with the great-grandson, also called "Elder", "Censor", or "Censorship"; 234-149 BC) - an ancient Roman politician and writer, known as an innovator of Roman literature and conservative fighter against vices and luxury.
              And something in their works. Reminiscences of some commandments, of some wandering people. You can’t read. You can’t find. Maybe because at that time, that people. To whom someone in some bush gave out something there, was not something else that the Ancient World was considered to be?
              And now with regards to your commandments, who gave them to whom?
              In the Old Testament, the Second Book of Moses, entitled "Exodus", tells how this great prophet organized the exodus of Jews from Egypt in the second half of the 170037nd century BC. uh ... Where did the numeral come from in antiquity. three years ago? http: //fb.ru/article/XNUMX/skolko-let-vodil-
              moisey-evreev-po-pustyine-ishod-evreev-iz-egipta
              And even if you look at a different version, Henry Hall, a well-known Egyptian archaeologist, generally supported the theory of Josephus Flavius, however, he believed that these events occurred somewhat later - in about 1400 BC. e.

              William Albright believes that the Exodus of the Jews occurred between 1250 and 1200. This point of view has a large number of followers among archaeologists who note the emergence of a new type of pottery, and, therefore, a new ethnic group in the region.

              It is known for certain that the ethnos of the Israelites already existed in Canaan around 1210 BC. e.
              So who were given those commandments and what did they have to do with my ancestors?
        3. Gardamir
          Gardamir 3 January 2018 09: 05 New
          +4
          [quote] [- plagiarism. / quote] and you compared? I took the Christian commandments, Islamic commandments, Prussian virtues and something else. So here is the code of the builder of communism, this is a fundamentally new phenomenon. And about the fact that he allegedly looks like a commandment, we were "opened eyes" in the years of perestroika. Then they spread lies, you can’t rake them in a hundred years.
          1. Pissarro
            Pissarro 3 January 2018 15: 07 New
            +1
            Well, open your eyes to the people, what do you read in the moral code of the builders of communism is fundamentally different?
            1. Gardamir
              Gardamir 3 January 2018 15: 15 New
              +1
              fundamentally different
              in the commandments, the relationship between people (personal). The code is personal and public.
              1. Pissarro
                Pissarro 4 January 2018 02: 25 New
                0
                Commandments establish rules of conduct in society
        4. populist
          populist 3 January 2018 10: 47 New
          +2
          dSK
          God's commandments are a true saint

          They say the Bible (Old Testament) from the Sumerians was rewritten. wink
          they are over 3000 years old

          The intelligent man is a species of the genus Humans. About 40 thousand years ago, its range already covers almost the entire Earth. How did they (all of humanity) live without this god for 37 thousand years? tongue Two-thirds still live unenlightened? And atheistic China rushes forward with inhuman speed. fellow So, do not flood about miracles.
          1. Evgenijus
            Evgenijus 3 January 2018 19: 48 New
            +1
            populist:
            They say the Bible (Old Testament) from the Sumerians rewrote. wink

            They say that chickens are milked, and cows are planted on eggs ... Let’s go on folk humor? Comedians in the studio! Do you happen to confuse the site address?
            1. Pancir026
              Pancir026 3 January 2018 22: 20 New
              +1
              Quote: Evgenijus
              You did not confuse the site with the address

              Well, actually, a debate on how many devils at the tip of the needle, with a game of scholasticism, was arranged by you here. So you probably got the site for an hour. You got it here: http://centralsynagogue.ru/ and when it was given and what was meant by it.
              Are you against the moral code of the communists? If you are against, can you explain what the trouble is with you?
              For me, everyone believes that he believes, and to forcibly impose religious views, and even on a site that has a very indirect relationship to this, is unnecessary.
              All once taken from something, including the Commandments.
            2. populist
              populist 3 January 2018 22: 38 New
              0

              Evgenijus
              populist:
              They say the Bible (Old Testament) from the Sumerians rewrote. wink

              They say that chickens are milked, and cows are planted on eggs ... Let’s go on folk humor? Comedians in the studio! Do you happen to confuse the site address?

              Folk humor is very useful and we need it. For
              “We all came out of the people,
              Children of the working-class family. ”
              Folk humor cannot be forgotten. Here's an example for you -
              "God is God, but do not be bad yourself."
              To break away from the people is dangerous. So the king with the bolyars came off and a lot of trouble came out of this. So, better not to come off. winked

              However, you did not answer my simple and direct question. good How did all of humanity manage for 37 thousand years without this god? And two-thirds of humanity have always managed without it, they are completely by now and do not want to know it. lol
    2. dSK
      dSK 3 January 2018 07: 34 New
      +4
      Hello Andrey!
      Quote: Rurikovich
      Power is in the truth!

      Before the “Battle of the Ice", Prince Alexander Yaroslavovich, who was not then 20 years old, prayed for a long time in the church of St. Sophia. Archbishop Spiridon blessed the prince and his army in battle. Leaving the temple, Alexander fortified the squad with faithful words: "God is not in power, but in truth. Some with weapons, others with horses, and we shall invoke the Name of the Lord our God! ".
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 3 January 2018 09: 11 New
        +3
        "God is not in power, but in truth. Some are with weapons, others are on horses, and we will call on the Name of the Lord our God!"
        You have a video that he said so. I'm not even joking. These words could put in his mouth after two hundred years after this event.
        1. dSK
          dSK 3 January 2018 19: 41 New
          +1
          Hello Leon!
          Quote: Gardamir
          These words

          The mighty Russian language, built on the foundation of the "Good News" of the Savior, highlights everything. His disciples, followers who will be at the second coming of Christ to the right from him inherit eternal life. And lovers "left options" will become left and doomed to endless torment. hi
    3. WapentakeLokki
      WapentakeLokki 4 January 2018 18: 30 New
      +4
      No brother power she in newtons yeah
    4. iouris
      iouris 5 January 2018 15: 55 New
      0
      Quote: Rurikovich
      And I think,

      Tell us what is “truth” and what is truth?
  2. Knowing
    Knowing 3 January 2018 06: 34 New
    +3
    Well, for the 3rd of January ... recourse the load is too great on the brain, which is in the head, which I eat and drink ... laughing And finally:
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. 3x3zsave
        3x3zsave 3 January 2018 12: 03 New
        0
        The brine does not help. Causes thirst and an unmeasured amount of water on the "old yeast". Dry red is better, and there is no food disgust and the soul is pleased.
    2. Gardamir
      Gardamir 3 January 2018 09: 12 New
      0
      the brain that is in the head that I eat and drink
      You decide. Is there a brain in your head, or just eat and drink?
  3. Same lech
    Same lech 3 January 2018 06: 49 New
    +5
    Very well, the author put the emphasis and place of RUSSIA now and in the future.

    I completely agree with him in RUSSIA should be created his own national elite for which the interests of his people should be like the 10 commandments for Moses.
    Putin will sooner or later leave the political arena of RUSSIA and who will take his place? ... God forbid some Chubais chick or US protege ... it will be a disaster for the country worse than Gorbachev’s rule.

    Now I am very interested in the current situation with our national bank of RUSSIA ...
    Is this financial structure subordinate to the constitution of RUSSIA or is it still over a national authority controlled from outside?
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 3 January 2018 06: 56 New
      +8
      Returning to socialism is again learning to make (in addition to weapons) nails, shovels, needles and threads, pots and pans. Free to treat people in the sanatoriums of Sochi and Crimea, cancel the mortgage and give free housing. Horror! belay
      1. Same lech
        Same lech 3 January 2018 06: 58 New
        +4
        Returning to socialism is again learning to make nails, shovels, needles and threads, pots and pans. Horror!

        Return to Chubais times with brothers and a scam with vouchers ... triple horror ... belay GOD FORBID. smile
      2. EwgenyZ
        EwgenyZ 3 January 2018 09: 31 New
        +5
        Quote: siberalt
        Returning to socialism is again learning to make (in addition to weapons) nails, shovels, needles and threads, pots and pans.
        The author wrote nonsense about communism that the collapse of the system was not predetermined. The collapse of the system was predetermined from the very beginning, from 1917. The Bolsheviks decided to introduce an idyllic system without taking into account the human factor, which led the system to a logical end. Everyone wants to live better, and the Soviet people are no exception, and when they saw that they "live" there, after all, it was even better then they sent communism to the dump. China's example is vivid proof of this, that the collapse of communism is predetermined.
        1. netmag
          netmag 3 January 2018 11: 23 New
          +3
          Eat, have fun, fuck, consume - capitalism exploits the simplest human instincts. They already exist in people, they only need to be developed harder. Capitalism needs consumers. It is simpler and therefore more stable. It is impossible to build communism on consumption *, here you are right. However, the Communists wanted to educate a new man - a creator, whose life would not fill the womb, but create. It is more difficult, but not impossible. So nothing was predetermined.
          1. EwgenyZ
            EwgenyZ 3 January 2018 12: 26 New
            +3
            Quote: netmag
            However, the Communists wanted to educate a new man - a creator, whose life would not fill the womb, but create. It is more difficult, but not impossible.

            The nature of man can not be altered. And the "degeneration" of the party elite is guaranteed. One priest said, I don’t remember who - "Communism is a great idea, but the trouble is that people began to make it."
            1. Per se.
              Per se. 3 January 2018 17: 02 New
              +3
              Quote: EwgenyZ
              One father said, I do not remember who - "Communism is a great idea, but the trouble is that people began to make it."
              And about religion, what is this "wonderful idea", the father did not say anything? For Russia, after the leader-leader has been formed in capitalism, and there remains only one way, which allows to remain a great country, to have development, this is socialism. The author, speaking of the development of capitalism as a world system, did not reflect the essence that for the development of capitalism we need more and more new markets, new colonies, without which a crisis is inevitable, depression, this is a world pyramid, the collapse of which is inevitable. The death of the USSR allowed to prolong the life of capitalism, due to the expansion of colonies, but further expansion of the pyramid will end, capitalism, like a planetary virus, will begin to devour itself. Capitalism had a positive development, was, while there was competition, while there were other real contenders for the world throne, now, with the advent of transnational monopolies, with a certain owner of the world system, there can be no "multi-polarity" rules of this system. “only a different social system, independent conditions, can give rise to another pole of power that was in the USSR and the socialist bloc in the world.” China is as “independent” as the Third Reich was independent, and both of them were allowed to rise by the Anglo-Saxons to create an anti-Russia, to organize a new war, in which competitors disengage themselves with alien prudence, all debts are written off, new super-profits are made. The article should be the main conclusion - to create a multipolar world, we need a self-sufficient leader with a new social system independent of capitalism, a socialist system. This leader can and should become a renewed Russia, with a renewed socialism. This will not happen, the whole world is waiting for the unenviable fate, like Europe and Japan subordinated to Anglo-Saxons, Russia, with its dependent fraternal oligarchs, the bloated economy of Chinese "national-communists", and the owners of the entire world capitalist system, the Anglo-Saxons, will devour the virus civilization, both materially sucking the resources of the planet by the consumer system, and the moral degradation of society in the cult of the new global Sodom and Gomorrah.
              1. EwgenyZ
                EwgenyZ 3 January 2018 22: 23 New
                +1
                Quote: Per se.
                And what about religion, what is this “wonderful idea”, the priest did not say anything?

                No, I didn’t.
                Quote: Per se.
                For Russia, after the master-leader has developed in capitalism, and there is only one way left that allows us to remain a great country, to have development, this is socialism.

                Is not a fact! Socialism, in its purest form, has already proved its non-viability. A different, not necessarily capitalistic, development path is needed. It is necessary to revive traditional values ​​(for Russians - Orthodoxy, for others their primordial beliefs), to focus on improving the education of the population, to increase funding for science and art, perhaps to develop their own concept of development, synthesizing capitalism with socialism. In general, the country must be faced with a super task, then there will be no talk - which development path should we choose.
                1. Pancir026
                  Pancir026 3 January 2018 22: 30 New
                  +2
                  Quote: EwgenyZ
                  Socialism, in its purest form, has already proved its non-viability.

                  Where and when did you see what? China, Vietnam, Cuba, what is it?
                  Defeat of the USSR? And what about the USSR, did the external adversary defeat or did they betray him from the inside? What does the socialism system have to do with it?
                  Quote: EwgenyZ
                  It is necessary to revive traditional values ​​(for Russians - Orthodoxy, for others their primordial beliefs), to focus on improving the education of the population, to increase funding for science and art, perhaps to develop their own concept of development

                  Yeah. It’s necessary, but what does the rake again have to do with it. They have already come. When they declared the convergence of socialism with capitalism, how it ended was known.
                  so how do you not go heel forward. with the head wrapped up, the devil knows where. but the future is not behind capitalism.
                  Quote: EwgenyZ
                  In general, the country must be faced with a super task, then there will be no talk - which development path should we choose.

                  Well, how, is capitalism able to give out the super task and the Project, in which there is something that the population will follow? They suggested, steal as much as you like. Take how much you bite, the result is not obvious to you?
                  1. EwgenyZ
                    EwgenyZ 4 January 2018 15: 59 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Pancir026
                    China, Vietnam, Cuba, what is it?

                    What are you talking about, my dear? China and Vietnam have long been on the ski trail of capitalism, if for some reason you have not noticed this. And the fact that there are Communist parties in power is not a fact that the countries are socialist. In China, a couple of years ago, the appeal "comrade" was canceled altogether, now they are all "gentlemen". Vietnam is walking along the “beaten track” of Deng Xiaoping. But in Cuba, after our “democrats" betrayed yesterday’s friends and allies, generally darkness, in everyday terms, even now Raul Castro is slowly bringing Cuba to the "Chinese model of" socialism. "
                    Quote: Pancir026
                    But did the USSR defeat the external adversary or did they betray him from the inside? What does the socialism system have to do with it?

                    The USSR "defeated" socialism, if you like. The country could not provide itself with food, despite the fact that in Ukraine we had the richest black soil. Shame and laughter, in the USA and in France they bought grain! And the situation with household appliances and the automotive industry ?! Do you think this is normal? When there was a choice, the Soviet people always chose imported, ignoring the domestic! Is that okay too? If you lived then you should be familiar with the word "firma". It was like a password for the “happy builder of communism”, if “firma” means beautifully and efficiently, it means from abroad!
                    Quote: Pancir026
                    Yeah. It’s necessary, but what does the rake again have to do with it. They have already come. When they declared the convergence of socialism with capitalism, how it ended was known.

                    It is known, of course it is known. The fact that the functionary of the Communist Party could not direct the country on the right path of development, so this is understandable, how can he, the sick man, know how the market economy works? That’s hu ... he wondered how it’s about, the Komsomol department did not teach the basics of a market economy in the agitation and propaganda department. But the experience of Hungary is very remarkable, it could be taken as a basis and finalized to today's conditions.
                    Quote: Pancir026
                    Well, and how, in the state of capitalism is able to give out the super task

                    But no how! Today’s power is political pygmies, they all come from the “bright past” that the author is so lamented about. If desired, everything is possible if there is political will, and today's "repainted" seek to get from life what they were deprived of in the Union.
          2. alexsipin
            alexsipin 5 January 2018 01: 35 New
            +2
            Quote: netmag
            However, the Communists wanted to educate a new man - a creator, whose life would not fill the womb, but create.

            Where did the then come from the closed distributors, the Birch shops, the personal members of the cart for the whole family, and the closed Tsekov housing with apartments that the "new man-creator" could not even dream of? Why did the Communists abandon the maximum party salary, and gained a bunch of benefits and privileges?
            1. netmag
              netmag 6 January 2018 10: 50 New
              0
              Your questions are about nothing. Once again: it’s difficult to raise a new person, it’s easy to indulge your whims. Difficult - you need to overcome, easy - just go with the flow. Therefore, all your questions fit into a whim. Naturally, power corrupts. Whatever it was you need to fight with your instincts, and this is difficult. It is much easier to use power and row for yourself. However, difficult does not mean impossible.
              1. alexsipin
                alexsipin 6 January 2018 12: 46 New
                0
                Quote: netmag
                Once again: it’s difficult to raise a new person, it’s easy to indulge your whims. Difficult - you need to overcome, easy - just go with the flow. Therefore, all your questions fit into a whim

                And how are you going to do this?
      3. Evgeniy667b
        Evgeniy667b 7 January 2018 08: 04 New
        0
        siberalt Otherwise, krants! Do you offer to buy somewhere? Supplemented already, the USSR pro ... aaali, then continue in orderly rows. Consumer society, what's worse? Further only non-existence ...
    2. Maki Avellevich
      Maki Avellevich 3 January 2018 07: 39 New
      +4
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      I completely agree with him in RUSSIA should be created his own national elite for which the interests of his people should be like the 10 commandments for Moses.


      the elite of any people is the function of this people. it grows from it, is not consciously created.
      1. EwgenyZ
        EwgenyZ 3 January 2018 09: 48 New
        +3
        Quote: Maki Avellevich
        the elite of any people is the function of this people. it grows from it, is not consciously created.

        The elite cannot be raised by hatred of their history. We were told for 70 years that everything was bad in Russia until 1917, and Lenin was a bright knight who crushed the accursed tsarism and freed the people (how is this different from what they now say in the Yeltsin Center? There are only different terms and a different character). The elite is brought up on the love of the motherland and on the love of its history, of the whole history, whatever it may be! And when they teach: here to love, but not here; then the elites will be appropriate.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. dSK
      dSK 3 January 2018 07: 51 New
      +2
      Hello Alexey!
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      the current situation with our national bank of RUSSIA ...
      The time will come and in Russia State bank, not a branch of the Fed. hi
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 January 2018 07: 39 New
    +5
    What caused the death of the Soviet Union and why a conscious collapse was possible with us, and not in the camp of the enemy?

    ... answer: Betrayal of the first persons of our state ...
    1. dSK
      dSK 3 January 2018 08: 58 New
      +3
      Hello Sergey!
      Quote: aszzz888
      of our state
      The modesty of our president is encouraging - he has honorary awards from other states that he almost never wears, a personal broadsword, the Order of Honor (March 12, 1996), the Order of Merit for the Republic of Dagestan (September 13, 2014), although he deserved more . If we recall Brezhnev, whose tunic did not fit all the awards.
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 3 January 2018 09: 12 New
        0
        dsk today, 08:58 ↑

        And you do not get sick! ... I meant the betrayal of Gorbachev, and the EBB made quite a few efforts to break up the USSR ...
        1. dSK
          dSK 3 January 2018 09: 51 New
          +1
          All Good News - a call for the honest fulfillment of the "official" duties of the main ideologists of that time - the Pharisees: Matthew 23: 27-28 "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, that you are likened to colored tombs that seem beautiful on the outside, and inside are full of dead bones and all impurities; in appearance you seem righteous to people, and inside you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. "
  5. parusnik
    parusnik 3 January 2018 08: 15 New
    +2
    Only its own path of development will lead the social subject out of the influence of the West with its neocolonialism.
    ... So far we have this: Dear audience! Last time, passing from the village of Shishini in Monte Carlo, you are facing the most popular couplets: Harry Soldy! Billy Moldy! Count Tolstoy has repeatedly argued that our life is a railway! On the same track , transferred to another and there is an option that will translate into a spare, a dead end, sucks ...
    1. 3x3zsave
      3x3zsave 3 January 2018 12: 15 New
      +1
      "And in what direction do not go along this railway, so you will definitely come to the station. And it’s not applicable with a buffet ...."
      (I don’t remember who)
  6. Beholder
    Beholder 3 January 2018 08: 23 New
    +1
    Quote: dsk
    ... God's commandments - a genuine, they are more than 3000 years old, and the "code of the builder of communism" is plagiarism.


    Sorry, but on what calendar do we have 3018 already?
    1. karish
      karish 3 January 2018 08: 30 New
      +1
      Quote: Beholder
      Quote: dsk
      ... God's commandments - a genuine, they are more than 3000 years old, and the "code of the builder of communism" is plagiarism.


      Sorry, but on what calendar do we have 3018 already?

      That's right, almost 3000 years
      The Old Testament is the first, oldest of the two (along with the New Testament) parts of the Christian Bible, borrowed from Christianity from Tanach (the ancient Jewish Holy Scriptures) and in Orthodoxy and Catholicism from other ancient Jewish religious books. In the Old Testament in all Christian denominations includes 39 books of Tanakh, which is a common sacred text of Judaism and Christianity
      The books of the Tanakh were written between XIII to V century BC uh. in Hebrew
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 3 January 2018 08: 31 New
    +2
    Yes, the author understands everything correctly. No need to wait for any relief from the “other side”. They decided that Russia was “everything”, and did not squeeze it at the moment when they could. Would arrange a couple of Maidan in the 93 - 94th, but! There was no clearly developed methodology for color revolutions. And the striatum cannot do without a training manual ...
    1. dSK
      dSK 3 January 2018 09: 41 New
      +1
      Hello Eugene!
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Would arrange a couple of Maidan in the 93 - 94th, but

      “The reason is in the hands of people, and the consequences are in the hands of God. Thus, St. Nicholas of Serbia outlined a formula that explains the fate of any nation. This was the article by Valentin Katasonov, doctor of economic sciences, scientist, writer and publicist. (An article on the Tsargrad TV channel 11: 05., 02.01.18/XNUMX/XNUMX) Maybe it is God's mercy for Russia that Boris Nikolaevich, having replaced three prime ministers in a year, stopped at Vladimir Vladimirovich and there would be no revolution or civil war. hi
  8. Mih1974
    Mih1974 3 January 2018 08: 56 New
    +4
    Hmm, I have only one question: is the author fundamentally wrong or is he specially engaged in juggling? Under the tempting “sauce” of truth about the integrity of the capitalist model, he is trying to rub some kind of nonsense about the “attractiveness of the IG”. am fool
    If you read the article correctly, then - after the words "the capitalist model MUST capture new markets" there should be a conclusion - in connection with the finiteness of the Earth as an economic model, capitalism is doomed to self-destruction !!!. Look at the "successes" of capitalism after the collapse of the USSR - the attractiveness of science and, in fact, no breakthrough inventions (science is engaged in "grinding" the already proven theories, "Cosmos - is almost buried for the World, just fill the orbits with space rubbish instead of choosing from 4 channels, a person "puzzled" choosing from 400 (never mind?), peaceful life - yes, after the collapse of the USSR, there were fewer wars in the world, moreover, there is a systematic destruction of the countries of the "third list." Repeating this all with the full LORD of capitalism on planet Earth !! negative . Only recently, China, as an alternative to Capitalism, began to take on more or less significant positions, but it was far from "taking its place in History." Therefore, it is very, very early to write off the social model. And actually for Russia it is not at all shameful to take "lessons from them" in managing the country. The same mechanism of "invariably changing the control apparatus through an invariable time period with the invariability of the orientation of the System itself" is the answer to the question "what to do?" good bully
    And by the way, the given example of “ig” is completely false. The former - IS has a completely "project of the West", this is clearly seen in the efforts with which the West tried and is trying to save them from destruction by Russia. Secondly, it is clear that the IS-project was not so straightforward as it might seem, in addition to the absorption of former officers and officials of Huseyv, who themselves were very dangerous in terms of "creating partisan movements" (which actually happened before IS), and infiltration from Western society "of persons dissatisfied with the System and capable of active actions", that is - passionaries. The moment - such a large number of "volunteers" from well-fed Western countries to the IG, I have long been led to the idea that the population of the capitalist countries is not very homogeneous in "joy" and there are enough "re-Evolutionaries". If earlier it turned into auto-war movements against the Vietnam War, hippies, or “USSR lovers”, then after the collapse of our country such people could not find a “way out of energy” and “the kettle began to boil.”
    But again I want to return to the idea that "a capitalist model cannot exist on planet Earth." Look what’s happening in Europe now, in terms of emigrants - I don’t know what it is specifically about “devouring the US rival of the EU” or an unintentional jamb of the capitalist “pursuit of profit”, but the fact is on the face. "Capitalism cannot live in a stable, steadily developing society."
    1. badens1111
      badens1111 3 January 2018 09: 10 New
      +3
      Quote: Mih1974
      "Capitalism cannot live in a stable, steadily developing society."

      Everything is simpler. Capitalism is war. And as Karl Marx used to say so unloved by many, the way out of capitalism is from the crisis, always through war.
      Here is the answer to what the world .. is capitalism.
    2. 3x3zsave
      3x3zsave 3 January 2018 12: 37 New
      0
      Bravo, Michael !!! You have thrown so many abstracts that VO, in this composition of commentators, is not able to digest. Bravo!!!! You are a smart person !!!
  9. Lelek
    Lelek 3 January 2018 10: 24 New
    +1
    When referring to terrorists, London and Washington use double standards, since their own actions can often be described as state terrorism. Acting as a judge, the West is far worse than those whom it judges.

    Double standards are one of the cornerstones of the foundation of "Western ideology." Yelling about the violation of rights and rules for some and the indulgence in destruction and murder for oneself. And all this under the sauce of "democracy."
  10. fa2998
    fa2998 3 January 2018 10: 39 New
    +3
    What is the transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world? Compare with the adversary on a submarine and ICBM -Little !! The USSR produced a quarter of the world's GDP, together with the rest of the allies - more than a third! Now, yes, we have Armata, Sineva, PAK FA, etc., but the hammers, axes, bulbs in the store are Chinese. Russia with its few% (more from gas and oil) is too early to get into the club of big guys! The economy must be restored, officials interfering with imprisonment and life acceptable to the people. Then we will be a country with a capital letter. And so, we are more like North Korea, the people are starving, but deploying the production of ICBMs. hi
    And do not (yes, many think so) as supporters of Navalny, record in spies, and the lack of patriotism! hi
  11. cannabis
    cannabis 3 January 2018 11: 04 New
    +1
    The author of the article, together with Andrei Fursov, takes us readers as Polish invaders into the wilds of politics. We have nothing to do there! We know that politics is an instrument of accumulating wealth in order to seize power. There has never been a unipolar world! There have always been remnants of the empire of the Rus and constantly attacking it, leaving the empire of the outskirts. The defeat of the USSR was just a tactical victory of the western enemy, coupled with the secret glee of its eastern neighbors. Russia did not suffer a strategic defeat. Not NATO and the USA are the main dangers for our country. The main enemies are internal traitors, degenerates, agents of influence. When all of them will suffer the fate of the youngest son Taras Bulba, then Russia will spread its wings and, for the joy of the peoples of the entire planet, will arrange a “PIR for the whole WORLD”.
  12. Cat Marquis
    Cat Marquis 3 January 2018 11: 07 New
    +4
    Oh, how they like to repeat the fairy tale that they say that the "communist elite" collapsed the USSR, and the rest of the people, like "nothing," so "stood aside" ... No, the gentlemen of the USSR destroyed all of you people. I did not forget the millions of demonstrations on the streets of Moscow and St. Petersburg with the slogans demanding "stop lying, down with the commies, we want Yeltsin, etc." I remember, I remember how the "defenders" of Yeltsin strummed guitars under the walls of the Kremlin, etc. But I do not blame anyone, everything was right. The Communists could not re-educate a person completely, much, simply, it is impossible to "re-educate" a person. So the USSR “won”, in fact, a private property-selfish vein that does not get old in a person — when “one's own” is always closer than the “common”, when one wants to “have” and not “give away”, when one always wants “freebies” and “ beautiful life. " It is for these reasons that the people trampled, like a herd of sheep behind the "promises", enthusiastically began to ruin the country - just like now, the same people do it all in Ukraine .... Actually, by and large, nothing in Russia has not changed, the people still believe in different "promises" that once again "shout out different slogans such as" May decrees "and so on." - Look, see how many "patriots" are on the forum ... By the way, I was talking at the festive table with former and rather successful colleagues, friends, etc., so they all categorically "against the Communists", I ask, - why? only please be honest, without this bullshit about the “Gulag”, “gebni”, “queues”, “coupons”, etc. Well, they, after a bit of crumbling, answered: ... “so they (the Communists) will take everything from us to the benefit of the people, you know how we “received” it and throughout the country so .... and strict laws will be introduced about profit, income tax and other controls ... nationalization will begin, a new redistribution in favor of the people or new people ... "we’ll have to share or lose everything at all ..... anyway, we’ll already live like we live now, we won’t, but we are already used to this life and prosperity .... wink
    1. 3x3zsave
      3x3zsave 3 January 2018 13: 02 New
      0
      In general - not news, but cool .... And where is the alternative?
      1. Cat Marquis
        Cat Marquis 3 January 2018 13: 51 New
        +2
        And where is the alternative?

        Um, the question is of course interesting .... but the answer has already been invented for a long time (now it is banned, because it is not at all tolerant ... it is indicated, in my opinion, in the Old Testament): "Conditions for the country's prosperity: one God, one people, one Lord. " This expression is known from the words of Adolf Hitler, he remade it "for himself": "One people, one Reich, one Fuhrer" (Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer) .... Now this is unattainable (except that in the DPRK lol ) for many reasons, means - know how to "enjoy" what is .... wink
    2. Colonel
      Colonel 3 January 2018 13: 05 New
      +3
      Quote: Cat Marquis
      No, the gentlemen of the USSR ruined all of you people.

      Quote: Cat Marquis
      people and trampled like a flock of sheep

      Quote: Cat Marquis
      with former and fairly successful fellow friends

      What does the former Russian not say in order to cover up his foulness?
      1. 3x3zsave
        3x3zsave 3 January 2018 21: 45 New
        +1
        Why did you decide that he is "former", have you heard about vpn services? In the Russian Federation, they have been banned since last October, and a person can be “over the hill” on a business trip. I agree with him, with our latent "approval" of the Union and collapsed. What was even easier, to bang Yelkin directly on the armored personnel carrier and "figs", but not the Bialowieza conspiracy. But, there was no "Voroshilov shooter" ...
        1. Colonel
          Colonel 3 January 2018 22: 20 New
          +2
          Why did you decide? Not from the flag, but from his phrases, especially the last one. I don’t want to proclaim the uppercase truth now, although no, I proclaim one. Big power is, first of all, big responsibility, and those who were at the helm then used power, and put responsibility on ... We are all now smart in hindsight, and then, after eighty-fifth, perestroika, you give publicity , well, and further on the points. As they say, it’s good to be smart before, like my wife later.
          1. 3x3zsave
            3x3zsave 3 January 2018 23: 08 New
            +1
            You know, I’ll probably only mention one politician over the past 50 years who didn’t “blame” (at least sometimes) on responsibility - Deng Xiaoping.
          2. Evgeniy667b
            Evgeniy667b 7 January 2018 08: 44 New
            0
            Respected Colonel if the people are higher consciousness, those who steers, he will not allow himself to be mocked. Nobody wanted to create, but to have, yes! So you were led by promises about a zhrachka, clothes, ..., and a saint of saints, that muck that is on 4 wheels. You hint that it is necessary to stop importing a car, you are immediately hung up. When the cooperatives started, the hunchback caught on and covered the trading, and the EBN first gave them the green light And drove them to make money out of thin air. Daklee chain reaction
    3. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 7 January 2018 08: 32 New
      0
      Cat Marquis, the fact that the USSR buried its own people, you are right in this! I also wanted to write about it, but just add. In the 80s, and it all began much earlier, the country was struck by an epidemic of materialism, selfish interests became above all else, and when this was reinforced by slogans, an irreversible process began. No need to blame Ukraine, we have not gone so far from them. And if the Union was still ashamed of such thoughts, now there are practically no brakes, and the conscience of the majority is hidden somewhere very far away. Until priorities change in the brains, Russia can follow the path of the USSR. No empire on earth could survive the one when the personal crowded out the public!
  13. netmag
    netmag 3 January 2018 13: 03 New
    +3
    Quote: EwgenyZ
    The nature of man can not be altered.

    Remake and how. People are not born bad, as well as good, it all depends on the upbringing - the remaking of a person.
  14. Cop
    Cop 3 January 2018 13: 14 New
    +5
    The Soviet system was originally based on a completely different principle - justice ...

    What is it like? Any citizen of the USSR could go to the fourth main department of the Ministry of Health, and so on. to heal? So, is it the author?
    1. 3x3zsave
      3x3zsave 3 January 2018 21: 48 New
      0
      Yeah, right in the Central Design Bureau, with Brezhnev in the same room to lie down ...
      1. Cop
        Cop 4 January 2018 10: 54 New
        +1
        Quote: 3x3zsave
        Yeah, right in the Central Design Bureau, with Brezhnev in the same room to lie down ...

        So the author says, they say ....
  15. Lexus
    Lexus 3 January 2018 14: 58 New
    +1
    The world-famous gopnik does not understand the human language. Only the inevitability of specific lyuli ...
  16. mac789
    mac789 3 January 2018 16: 12 New
    0
    Mdyayaya ... I'm afraid the author offers another project to combat the refrigerator ... Like, you all work for free from dawn to dusk and in twenty years there will be communism ... As a result, after twenty years of struggle, the refrigerators will win.
  17. turbris
    turbris 3 January 2018 21: 01 New
    +1
    Quote: Cat Marquis
    Actually, by and large, nothing has changed in Russia either - the people still believe in different "promises" that once again "shout out different slogans such as" May decrees, etc. "- Look, see how many" patriots "are on the forum ..

    Well, people in any country under the influence of the media believe in all kinds of "promises" and in the USA this is most pronounced, in Russia just after any events people are not very influenced by the media. And as for the "patriots" in the forum - yes, their glory to God has become larger and this is very good, because people think about their future and do not connect their future with an unconstitutional change of power, knowing that some will replace the others, and the people will remain with their interests.
  18. turbris
    turbris 3 January 2018 21: 06 New
    +3
    Quote: Cop
    What is it like? Any citizen of the USSR could go to the fourth main department of the Ministry of Health, and so on. to heal? So, is it the author?

    Well, of course not, but the salary of a skilled worker, sometimes it was more than the salary of an engineer, and indeed the head of the workshop. Therefore, the level of general well-being did not differ much, what ordinary managers could afford, ordinary workers could also afford. This created the illusion of justice.
    1. Cop
      Cop 4 January 2018 10: 47 New
      +2
      Quote: turbris
      Well, of course not, but the salary of a skilled worker, sometimes it was more than the salary of an engineer, and indeed the head of the workshop. Therefore, the level of general well-being did not differ much, what ordinary managers could afford, ordinary workers could also afford. This created the illusion of justice .......

      The illusion of justice was created by propaganda, the press affairs committee, the first departments, the fifth GU KGB of the USSR, etc. And money? So the salary of the party committee secretary was less than the salary of a skilled worker. And who received the first free apartment, summer vacation and a free ticket to the best sanatoriums of Crimea? I’m not talking about special distributors in the form of prom sales.