Military Review

BDK "Orsk" is included in the composition of the ships of constant readiness

24
Large landing ship of the Black Sea fleet "Orsk" is included in the composition of the ships of constant readiness, the press service of the Southern Military District


BDK "Orsk" is included in the composition of the ships of constant readiness


[Quote] The crew of a large landing ship (BDK) “Orsk” that was repaired completed the mandatory training cycle provided after the ship left the repair and confirmed the necessary level of organization of the ship service when stationed in the base, as well as the ability to perform tasks at sea [/ - reads the message.

It is noted that "Orsk", together with the division of marines, took part in a tactical-special lesson on loading and disembarking vehicles and troops on an unequipped coast, carried out a complex of artillery firing at sea, air and ground targets.

According to the results of the combat training activities, the Orsk BDK was included in the permanent readiness ships of the Black Sea Fleet.

BDK project 1171 "Orsk" laid at the shipyard "Yantar" in Kaliningrad 30 August 1967 year. 31 December 1968 of the year was commissioned and became part of the Black Sea Fleet.

Dimensions: length - 113,1 m, width - 15,6 m, draft - 4,5 m.
Maximum travel speed: 16,5 nodes
Navigation range: 10000 miles with 15 nodes.
Powerplant: 2 diesel, 2 propeller, 9000 hp
Capacity: up to 1500 tons of vehicles and cargo.
Armament: 1X2 57-mm artillery mount ZIF-31B.
Crew: 55 people.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dezinto
    Dezinto 26 December 2017 13: 45 New
    +3
    in Kaliningrad on August 30, 1967. It went into operation on December 31, 1968


    Well, why is there nothing newer!?!? Well, how is that?

    Joy full of holife straight.

    They carried out repairs .... They patched the rust, and now there is Internet access near the shore?
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 26 December 2017 13: 56 New
      +7
      poor "Orsk" and the crew, well, the commander ... brace yourself ... no money, but you hold on. ... I just know first hand how this all happens. I won’t even comment on who will understand the topic. (goofy) -to visit the crew ...).
    2. Blombirus
      Blombirus 26 December 2017 13: 56 New
      +3
      More will serve eleven years. He is not in the attack to go, carry loads, with which he will cope perfectly. And what exactly do you know about ship repairs? Where does the info about latki on rust come from? Are there any ships without rust at all? Blah blah blah. Ships are a lot of denyushki stand, prokidytes.
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 26 December 2017 14: 01 New
        +4
        Quote: BlombiRus
        Where does the info about latki on rust come from? Are there any ships without rust at all?

        where did Kuznetsov get spare parts? were you in the holds of the destroyers 956 project? you know that the anchor rot .... I will not continue, I can not survive in the "cells", and so not for long ...
        1. Blombirus
          Blombirus 26 December 2017 16: 14 New
          +1
          I was not in the holds, I am on the other side. Do you know how a repair plan is made? How is the estimate written? What is troubleshooting? Have you heard anything about the personal responsibility of the engineers? They also do not want to die in the "chamber"! So maybe all the same there is a hope that the repair was carried out efficiently?
      2. Dezinto
        Dezinto 26 December 2017 14: 03 New
        +3
        Here is what I mean by lamenting. For alignment. Support ships are "partners."



        This shit will deliver a small army to the desired port, and we ......... are building ...

        1. Sargas
          Sargas 26 December 2017 14: 39 New
          +3
          The difference between "This shit will deliver a small army to the desired port" - i.e. - you actually do not catch the banal cargo ship and BDK?
        2. Don
          Don 26 December 2017 18: 38 New
          +2
          Our USC will not be able to build ships and vessels with such a displacement for a long time, even on the Far Eastern Star. But we are very good at building palaces and castles for generals, directors, various effective managers, their children and secretaries. Let the partners envy us at least wink . But seriously .... but seriously impossible, because the hand immediately reaches for the gun.
    3. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 26 December 2017 14: 02 New
      +7
      There are 4 more in the ranks.

      It is strange that the article did not indicate the landing capabilities.
      Landing capabilities
      The ship can hold up to 20 main battle tanks, or 45 armored personnel carriers, or 50 trucks, and 300-400 landing men (two landing cubicles, under the first and fourth twindeks). A ship can carry up to 1000 tons of various cargoes. In the bow there is a compartment for armored vehicles, there is also a landing ramp closed by sliding gates, and in the stern for loading and unloading operations a folding lapport is equipped.
    4. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 26 December 2017 14: 13 New
      +3
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Well, why is there nothing newer!?!? Well, how is that?
      Joy full of holife straight.

      Yes, colleague, it is joys, and by no means complete breeches. So far, there are more important things, such as RTOs and corvettes with frigates. As well as the Boreas, Sarmatians, Zircons, aviation, drones ... Didn’t notice that something began to change in the world? Goodwin, the Great and Terrible, did not have a competitor, but an alternative appeared, which was quite humane and sane. And the savages, of whom the world consists of 70%, became thoughtful. Do we need them? Hell, well, the shaitans are digging in there in an adult way, anyway they’ll be tied to us, after all, we’ll fight back then. Just no longer need to feed the monkeys free then, that's all.
      1. Dezinto
        Dezinto 26 December 2017 14: 15 New
        +2
        Very messy. But in general, I get it. hi
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 26 December 2017 14: 45 New
        +1
        The issue of price. Against this background, a landing ship (namely a paratrooper / supply / functional ship with a bunch of resources and 240 + camping days in a year) costs a penny.

        Well, that is, which corvette will easily pull for 200 + million.
        The paratrooper is turnkey 50mln at a foreign shipyard.
    5. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 26 December 2017 22: 58 New
      0
      There are newer ones, but the old one will still serve, there isn’t any money at once, all the more so since he will completely cope with his tasks ...
    6. sso-xnumx
      sso-xnumx 27 December 2017 14: 36 New
      0
      If the case set is in good condition, then why not serve? Changed the engines, electronics, something else, if necessary, and let them plow themselves across the ocean.
      PS Correctly spelled GALIFE! Check, at least occasionally, spelling. How can one spoil one's native language? Or are you not Russian?
  2. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 26 December 2017 13: 47 New
    +3
    Ndaaa ... not at all fresh, and to be honest it looks like some kind of tub.
    1. 210ox
      210ox 26 December 2017 13: 59 New
      +4
      Half a century. When the view was quite appropriate time ..
      Quote: Alexey-74
      Ndaaa ... not at all fresh, and to be honest it looks like some kind of tub.
    2. san4es
      san4es 26 December 2017 14: 56 New
      +4
      Quote: Alexey-74
      ... looks like some kind of tub.

      ... it's a disguise
      soldier

      At first glance, the BDK pr. 1171 (code “Tapir”) evokes a certain feeling of awkwardness - a bulk carrier-bulk carrier (trailer) mobilized for military service during the threatened period. But in terms of carrying capacity and cargo capacity, 1171 alone costs two 775, and the smallest total per knot (according to other sources, 1,3 / 1,5 knots [1/3] is more than compensated for by more than a third (37,1 %) with a cruising range of 16 knots (4800 miles when filling ballast tanks against 3500 miles), which indicates that the "old man" is not so bad and explains why the four remaining Tapirs are cherished and are not in a hurry to cut into metal.

      project 775:
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 26 December 2017 13: 49 New
    +2
    He is a poor fellow, he asks for retirement, but he can’t even see a replacement!
  4. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 26 December 2017 13: 49 New
    +5
    We need, "steam locomotives for Middle Eastern expresses" are very necessary. I feel, soon the Libyan will be.
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 26 December 2017 14: 05 New
      +7
      I really hope that your instincts will not let you down. yes
  5. assa67
    assa67 26 December 2017 13: 57 New
    +6
    they didn’t even write how much the SECRET will eat from the ramp
  6. NEXUS
    NEXUS 26 December 2017 17: 14 New
    +3
    I don’t know, maybe I can buy new BDKs from the Chinese ... well, I look at the same Gren ... he only lacks oars on the sides. The 21st century is in the yard, and we are building ships of the good Soviet times, which at that time were relevant.
  7. HEATHER
    HEATHER 26 December 2017 22: 50 New
    +1
    1968. Until the topic. Is it time to replace? In any case, the grandfather is already. Although, while pulling.
  8. raw174
    raw174 27 December 2017 09: 11 New
    +2
    How realistic is the combat use of such a ship in the 21st century? I think only as a carrier of military and civilian cargo. He is unlikely to land a landing force in a combat situation ...