Military Review

Russia did not make decisions on the supply of weapons to the Donbass

55
Moscow did not make any decisions on the supply of defensive weapons to the east of Ukraine in connection with the decision of the United States to supply such weapons to Kiev.


Russia did not make decisions on the supply of weapons to the Donbass


No decisions were made on this score.
- told the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov in response to the question whether the Russian Federation intends to supply such weapons to the DPR and the LPR.

On Friday, State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert reported that the United States had decided to put Ukraine on "advanced defense equipment" as part of Washington's efforts to strengthen the country's defense capability. Prior to this, ABC reported that US President Donald Trump is expected to approve a plan involving the supply of anti-tank weapons to the Ukrainian authorities in the amount of $ 47 million. Javelin anti-tank missile systems may be included in this batch. If Trump approves this plan, he will go to the US Congress for consideration. The lawmakers will have this on 30 days.

Over the past few years, both Republicans and Democrats have voted to include articles on the provision of "lethal military assistance" to Ukraine in US defense budgets, TASS reports.
Photos used:
PRESS SERVICE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE FEDERATION
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 25 December 2017 14: 19 New
    +3
    And who else expected? The Donetsk residents can themselves do a lot of things now, too ... the benefit is already the experience of Syria.
    1. Reserve officer
      Reserve officer 25 December 2017 14: 35 New
      +5
      "Russia did not make decisions on the supply of weapons to the Donbass"

      Serious politicians with developed thinking and responsibility, unlike the press service of the State Department, do not apply to decisions of this kind to the public. And there can be many decisions - for example, to “facilitate” the receipt of the mentioned weapons as trophies immediately in the LPR and DPR.
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 25 December 2017 14: 43 New
        +3
        Russia did not make decisions on the supply of weapons to the Donbass

        let's, too, send to the Donbass "Javelins" ... but what ???
        1. svp67
          svp67 25 December 2017 14: 48 New
          +2
          Quote: Dead Day
          let's, too, send to the Donbass "Javelins" ... but what ???

          So send, I hope you know the address.
          1. Grandfather
            Grandfather 26 December 2017 13: 38 New
            0
            Quote: svp67
            So send, I hope you know the address.

            Voentorg knows ...
        2. Baloo
          Baloo 25 December 2017 15: 02 New
          +1
          Quote: Dead Day
          Russia did not make decisions on the supply of weapons to the Donbass

          let's, too, send to the Donbass "Javelins" ... but what ???

          Let's fellow drinks good
        3. Vadim237
          Vadim237 25 December 2017 15: 53 New
          +1
          Let’s send the “Tulips” - it’s just VSU pillboxes and art positions that are distributed, for three years they dug in well there.
          1. segamegament
            segamegament 25 December 2017 18: 31 New
            +2
            in the presence of 200 units of trunks (and even better 250!) per kilometer of the front and it does not matter who, how long and how long it has been dug. It will matter if they will need to be dug up or left for humus ...
      2. antivirus
        antivirus 25 December 2017 14: 55 New
        +2
        So they came to: "with whom are you masters of art? (politicians)
        make a choice.
        streamlined phrases
        or Kurshaveli or task in the suburbs
      3. SOF
        SOF 25 December 2017 15: 54 New
        +2
        And there can be many decisions - for example, to “facilitate” the receipt of the mentioned weapons as trophies immediately in the LPR and DPR

        ... or even simpler:
        The DPR and LPR are recognized by South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which, in turn, are recognized by Russia, and with which we have agreements on military-technical cooperation.
        Do you think the Abkhazians need S-300 systems? Well, or Ossetians TOS-1A? Can toss them?
        And everything will be absolutely official ...
    2. Burbon
      Burbon 25 December 2017 14: 57 New
      +4
      No decisions were made on this score.
      and how many screams were that if the State Department decided to supply the lethal, then we would put something like that ..... swallow and chew .... just talk in the language .... we haven’t been answering words for a long time ... ugh
      1. svp67
        svp67 25 December 2017 14: 59 New
        +7
        Quote: Burbon
        . swallowed and chewed ...

        Yes? Well, let them think so ... The main thing here is NOT to SCREAM, but DO IT.
        1. Burbon
          Burbon 25 December 2017 15: 05 New
          0
          Quote: svp67
          Yes? Well, let them think so ... The main thing here is NOT to SCREAM, but DO IT.

          so nothing is done ...... people are being killed? Yes .... only humanitarian aid and all!
          1. svp67
            svp67 25 December 2017 16: 08 New
            +2
            Quote: Burbon
            so nothing is done ...... people are being killed? Yes .... only humanitarian aid and all!

            People are VERY sorry. And this is SINCERELY. And our "humanitarian" is far from superfluous there. But here it’s “rude” to intervene there, we cannot do it the same ... We must be careful and cunning.
      2. private person
        private person 25 December 2017 15: 29 New
        +3
        Do you propose openly entering the war with Ukraine? Like it or not, LDNR is the territory of Ukraine (but our Crimea), and all empty talk about Russia should be RUSSIA TO ANYONE AND NOTHING FOR WHICH. It was necessary to scream in the 90s. Russia promised that it wouldn’t give up so it wouldn’t give up; otherwise, Ukrainians would have long destroyed the republics with the help of their curators.
        1. Burbon
          Burbon 25 December 2017 15: 39 New
          0
          Quote: private person
          Do you offer

          put weapons LDNR and declare this ....
      3. SOF
        SOF 25 December 2017 17: 56 New
        0
        Quote: Burbon
        and how many cries were that if only the State Department decided to supply the lethal, then we would put that

        ... let me react without correctness to this remark (I’m not an official person, thank God): Galimo LIES - not a single person, under real power, said this. Well maybe Zhirinovsky, perhaps ....
        1. Burbon
          Burbon 25 December 2017 18: 26 New
          0
          Quote: SOF
          Galimo LIES

          to myself ... to myself ....
          1. SOF
            SOF 25 December 2017 18: 46 New
            0
            ... it’s impossible to myself, because it’s too clumsy ... you throw a fan over
            hi
    3. Sergey53
      Sergey53 25 December 2017 15: 13 New
      0
      Marmots did not give a command yet?
    4. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 25 December 2017 16: 00 New
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      And who else expected?

      Duc, zhurnalyugi. yes She-bo, like small children, unreasonable. Found someone to ask. What immediately did GlavKom not immediately have: “Vladimir Vladimirovich, answer as in spirit - Voentorg is functioning in the Donbass”? laughing
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic 25 December 2017 14: 20 New
    +8
    You can not make decisions, but simply send a certain batch of some weapons and ammunition. And the decision can be made later - the main thing is to act now!
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 25 December 2017 15: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      You can not make decisions, but simply send a certain batch of some weapons and ammunition.

      for example, to Abkhazia or South Ossetia.
    2. Topotun
      Topotun 25 December 2017 15: 06 New
      +3
      So after all, the Ukrainian An was shot down at an altitude of 4500 .... And the height of the defeat of the main MANPADS was 3500-4000 m .... And only the new "Willow" reaches 4500 m already (or maybe even higher, who knows). ...
      1. segamegament
        segamegament 25 December 2017 18: 35 New
        0
        Osa-AKM or Strela-10SV there they are legally
        1. Topotun
          Topotun 26 December 2017 11: 02 New
          +1
          No, Arrow 10 doesn’t roll. According to media reports, their altitude is also 3.5 km. Wasp-AK, yes it could. But I’m not sure that at that moment the militias had such complexes. were. Like the experts on them. Still, this is already a complicated technique.
  3. ODERVIT
    ODERVIT 25 December 2017 14: 23 New
    +7
    About decisions you can and not whistle on every corner .......
    1. Burbon
      Burbon 25 December 2017 14: 58 New
      +1
      Quote: ODERVIT
      About decisions you can and not whistle on every corner .......

      belay what are you ???? ... but why was the State Department warning the whole world ???
      1. cariperpaint
        cariperpaint 25 December 2017 17: 44 New
        0
        and the Yankees haven’t set anything yet)
  4. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 25 December 2017 14: 28 New
    +1
    Quote: svp67
    And who else expected? The Donetsk residents can themselves do a lot of things now, too ... the benefit is already the experience of Syria.

    They have one more ally. South Ossetia. She will not give up. This is all diplomacy, of course, but no one will ever tell you about their decision. The USA and NATO countries have been illegally dumping weapons there for a long time. Except for heavy weapons, which are not you’ll hide. So there’s nothing new. Yes, Peskov doesn’t need to know everything and speak.
    1. oldzek
      oldzek 25 December 2017 15: 32 New
      0
      why don’t you know about it and you won’t blab. but in general about your intentions to inform the probable ....
  5. Tyulen
    Tyulen 25 December 2017 14: 32 New
    +1
    They didn’t make a decision, so they spontaneously set that they quickly raked from junk.
  6. solzh
    solzh 25 December 2017 14: 34 New
    +1
    It's time to make a decision. But the Kremlin for some reason cannot make a decision. What does our guarantor expect? New war in the Donbass?
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 25 December 2017 14: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: solzh
      It's time to make a decision. But the Kremlin for some reason cannot make a decision. What does our guarantor expect? New war in the Donbass?
      And what is the guarantor waiting for? If you aren’t in the know, then he already openly said a month and a half ago at a press conference: “If such a decision is made in the USA, it will not be able to contribute to the advance of peace on Urkain. Yes, and there are no guarantees that in response to this weapon will not appear in other areas of Urkaina sensitive for Kiev "(not verbatim, but something like that). In my opinion, the hint is more than clear.
      1. Karabin
        Karabin 25 December 2017 20: 40 New
        +2
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        And what is the guarantor waiting for? If you aren’t in the know, then already a month and a half ago at a press conference he openly said: -

        If you aren’t in the know, the guarantor will make a tune of how to drink soda.
    2. Spez
      Spez 25 December 2017 15: 02 New
      +3
      But the Kremlin for some reason cannot make a decision.

      You were misled by the lack of the word “direct” in the statement. There were no official direct deliveries, and most likely there will not be. So far, only partially recognized South Ossetia has recognized LDNR as sovereign states. The rest are waiting for Russia and the USA. If LDNR is recognized by Russia, difficulties may arise with a change in status after the possible accession of these entities to the Russian Federation. IMHO.
  7. morpogr
    morpogr 25 December 2017 14: 36 New
    +1
    You would think that we should report this with an emergency TASS message. Let them be tormented and lost in conjecture, and then there will be a surprise.
  8. dim7ka
    dim7ka 25 December 2017 14: 48 New
    +3
    No plans, but we have been supplying weapons there since 2014.
  9. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 25 December 2017 14: 56 New
    +7
    Not officially, we have a lot of things, so the Javelins will not change the weather.
  10. Observer2014
    Observer2014 25 December 2017 14: 58 New
    +5
    Yes, put you better people Russian passports! Mumble around for about 4 years already ..
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 25 December 2017 16: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: Observer2014
      Yes, put you better people Russian passports!

      A colleague, there is a "mirror" option - for citizens of the Russian Federation in large numbers submit docks for obtaining passports of the DNI and LC. Personally, I will not consider this a “dual” citizenship, rather, both documents will be as a whole.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 25 December 2017 18: 30 New
        +3
        Paranoid50 ,
        there is a “mirror” option - for citizens of the Russian Federation in large numbers to submit docks for passports of the DNI and LC.
        Agree hi If the mountain does not go to Mohammed, then Mohammed goes to the mountain.
    2. Karabin
      Karabin 25 December 2017 20: 52 New
      +1
      Quote: Observer2014
      Yes, put you better people Russian passports!

      No way. Now, if Abkhazians lived in Donetsk, then yes. Or the Syrians. Passports, like the Syrians, are certainly not supposed to, but you could count on “calibrating” ukroart. So, call lads.
  11. vissarion
    vissarion 25 December 2017 16: 47 New
    0
    There is nothing to dissolve snot and smear tears of tenderness. How are they to us. so are we to them. We have South Ossetia. She recognized the DNI and LC. Here and overtake through them the weapons that you need. But all this is done quietly, without noise and dust. And less talk. Then we'll see. who whom and when.
  12. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 25 December 2017 17: 26 New
    +1
    Quote: Burbon
    what are you ???? ... but why was the State Department warning the whole world ???

    Something you react nervously. In a difficult situation, it hurts. Warned yes. People do not understand. But we are not playing sea battle to voice every move. There are people who monitor the situation and make decisions. The result is important, not who said what.
    1. Burbon
      Burbon 25 December 2017 17: 54 New
      0
      Quote: Lena Petrova
      The result is important, not who said what.

      chatting not tossing bags
  13. assa67
    assa67 25 December 2017 17: 54 New
    +5
    mattress and maple mattresses from the very beginning of the conflict supplied weapons through third countries (the Commonwealth and the bros) the main stream ... and the instructors worked openly ... what are we worse? ... we will drive through Vietnam .... well , or the return of "low-quality" coal ...
  14. segamegament
    segamegament 25 December 2017 18: 28 New
    0
    why hasn’t it yet been accepted, or has long been accepted, or hasn’t accepted, but delivered? Diplomacy, her mother ...
  15. Karabin
    Karabin 25 December 2017 21: 20 New
    +1
    No decisions were made on this score.
    Sands said. Immediately there were many VOexperts with HP. Saying Peskov showed our peacekeeping, fluffy, internationally respecting position, but in fact we will respond to the impudent Yankees and put everything to our brave miners. From a rifle to the S-300 with Iskander. And they even called the route through South Ossetia or Abkhazia. Gentlemen, why not through Vanuatu? From the islanders, however, they will not depart. And they have no oil. And Trump is unlikely to find them on the globe. Why can the Yankees openly and the Russians not? Why are the Kremlin curators of LDNR, everything is done at night and through the railway ... The result is still the same, quietly shoving the miners off the miners, or in the open. Those who need it in the west know where, when and how much was delivered to the Donbass. If not accurate to the shell, then accurate to the truck. Well, do not consider them idiots.
  16. Prutkov
    Prutkov 25 December 2017 21: 34 New
    +2
    There is a good production base in the Donbass. That allows you to independently produce and repair weapons. Mortars and large-caliber rifles are already doing. There is a cartridge plant in Lugansk. It is possible to establish the production of mines for mortars. I won’t be surprised if they suddenly don’t start making heavy M160 mortars. Powerful thing. And the ammunition is powerful. And the caliber allows you to experiment with active-reactive mines, adjusted ammunition.
    1. LeonidL
      LeonidL 26 December 2017 03: 31 New
      0
      This is good, but not enough for modern warfare. We need excellent electronics, night vision goggles, electronic warfare, PSNR, locators, drones if this does not happen - there will be no victory, but there will be a “Croatian” version sooner or later.
  17. Nemesis
    Nemesis 25 December 2017 22: 18 New
    0
    Even if he accepts, it is not necessary to report this ... The USA, without noise, transferred several Abrams tanks to Bandera, and besides, there are rumors that a new South Korean Black Panther tank was field tested in the ranks of the Armed Forces
  18. LPD17
    LPD17 25 December 2017 23: 19 New
    +1
    a half-eyed gentleman is waiting for a summer house in Miami on Sunny Island))) oh sorry sorry apartment
  19. iouris
    iouris 26 December 2017 00: 52 New
    +1
    It would be better to talk about his impressions of the ballet "Nuriev".
  20. LeonidL
    LeonidL 26 December 2017 03: 29 New
    +1
    No need to make decisions, you really need to help with weapons, ammunition and electronic warfare in the fight against the Nazis. Munich experience is not enough? The experience of the Spanish Republic of 1936-1939 is not enough? Betray again?