Military Review

Guatemala after the United States decided to transfer the embassy to Jerusalem

80
President of Guatemala Jimmy Morales decided to transfer to Israel in Israel, following a similar decision of Donald Trump, reports RIA News.




According to Morales, he discussed this issue with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

I inform you that I have instructed the Minister of Foreign Affairs to initiate appropriate actions so that it will be,
wrote the president on Facebook.

Recall that in early December, US President Donald Trump announced the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, signing a document on the transfer of the embassy there from Tel Aviv. This decision was gladly met in Israel, but it caused a negative reaction from many states, primarily the Middle Eastern countries and Palestine.

Recently, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution not to recognize the US decision on the status of Jerusalem. 128 countries supported the document, nine against, 35 abstained.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Strips
    Strips 25 December 2017 10: 28 New
    +4
    A good start is not a trifle, although it starts with a trifle good drinks
    1. Finches
      Finches 25 December 2017 10: 48 New
      16
      "The haberdasher and the Cardinal are power!" laughing
      1. Iaaa
        Iaaa 25 December 2017 11: 00 New
        +8
        Their one word saved America laughing
        1. Finches
          Finches 25 December 2017 11: 11 New
          +2
          Israel saved ... laughing
          1. Arzoo
            Arzoo 25 December 2017 23: 25 New
            +1
            This is a coalition of the USA, Israel and a couple of Honduras laughing
      2. Strips
        Strips 25 December 2017 11: 16 New
        +3
        Quote: Finches
        "The haberdasher and the Cardinal are power!"


        Down and Out trouble started bully
      3. Incvizitor
        Incvizitor 25 December 2017 13: 20 New
        +2
        "The haberdasher and the Cardinal are power!"

        Sherkhan and Tobaccos.
    2. DEDPIHTO
      DEDPIHTO 25 December 2017 10: 51 New
      +8
      Guatemala, following the United States, kicked the decision to move the embassy to Jerusalem ... as well as Ukrolandiya, Limpopo, Nabira, Binomo and other less significant US allies ..
      1. Strips
        Strips 25 December 2017 11: 13 New
        +7
        Quote: DEPHIHTO
        as well as Ukrolandiya, Limpopo, Nabiru, Binomo and others


        Well, yes, Russia is held by super significant states - Armenia, Belarus, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Cuba, Nicaragua, Syria, Sudan.

        Cuba, apparently, still buzzes with happiness that it has been forgiven for almost $ 30 billion. Russia is a rich country, a generous soul drinks

        True, prices in Russia are rising, taxes are rising, well, it's your own ...
        1. Iaaa
          Iaaa 25 December 2017 11: 25 New
          10
          Quote: Tiras
          super significant states - Armenia, Belarus, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Cuba, Nicaragua, Syria, Sudan.

          Yeah! And also absolutely, not at all significant-China, India ....., continue the list?
          What can I say, even such friends of the states as Canada and Poland abstained. So it’s not necessary about the all-civilized world ..... Have already passed this ....
          1. DEDPIHTO
            DEDPIHTO 25 December 2017 11: 37 New
            +2
            Quote: Iaaa
            Quote: Tiras
            super significant states - Armenia, Belarus, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Cuba, Nicaragua, Syria, Sudan.

            Yeah! And also absolutely, not at all significant-China, India ....., continue the list?
            What can I say, even such friends of the states as Canada and Poland abstained. So it’s not necessary about the all-civilized world ..... Have already passed this ....

            drinks ..that's all, colleague, I have nothing to add yes
          2. Strips
            Strips 25 December 2017 11: 37 New
            +4
            Quote: Iaaa
            Yeah! And also absolutely, not at all significant-China, India ....., continue the list?


            Of course. Let's.

            The first and significant resolution on the Crimea.
            Who voted with Russia against the resolution?

            Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Cuba, Nicaragua, Syria, Sudan.

            See China there? India?
            1. Iaaa
              Iaaa 25 December 2017 11: 55 New
              +9
              Quote: Tiras
              Of course. Let's.

              Too lazy to look. Google yourself. But the number of countries supporting this resolution is declining. Unfortunately for you, probably.
              And further. The article is not about Crimea but about Guatemala. So you are not a kid in the subject, they began to compare sour with parallel ...
              1. Strips
                Strips 25 December 2017 12: 46 New
                +1
                Quote: Iaaa
                Too lazy to look. Google yourself. But the number of countries supporting this resolution is declining. Unfortunately for you, probably.


                Yes, it is not particularly reduced over the past two years.
                Remember the resolution that was a year ago or two.

                Quote: Iaaa
                And further. The article is not about Crimea but about Guatemala. So you are not a kid in the subject, they began to compare sour with parallel ...


                Much is seen in comparison.
                Yes, it’s just quite comparable - they don’t want to recognize either.
                1. Iaaa
                  Iaaa 25 December 2017 13: 27 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Tiras
                  Yes, it is not particularly reduced over the past two years.
                  Remember the resolution that was a year ago or two.

                  But is it shrinking? And I already wrote to you, what would you google yourself. Maybe China and India have seen. Strange as it may seem, two well, absolutely not significant powers: China and India are again on the list for Russia ..
                  An interesting dynamic begins when we compare the new decision of the General Assembly with the "parent" resolution on the Crimea of ​​2014 - 68/262. All subsequent UN human rights documents on the peninsula refer to it.

                  The first and main resolution refused to recognize the “referendum” in Crimea and the annexation of Crimea by Russia. Then 100 countries voted for it, only 11 voted against, and 82 states abstained and did not vote.

                  But further into the regiment of those disagreeing with pro-Ukrainian decisions, the General Assembly began to arrive. So, the number of countries that are in favor last year and this year fell by a third - to 70. And those who are against - more than doubled - to 26.

                  Moreover, such major powers as India and China appeared in the composition of the opponents, which together occupy 25% of world GDP (in 2014 they simply abstained from voting).

                  The evolution of views is also interesting for the main US ally in the Middle East - Saudi Arabia. In 2014, she voted in favor, and in 2017 she already preferred to abstain, apparently not wanting to spoil relations with Russia, which this year began to improve.
            2. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 25 December 2017 12: 07 New
              +5
              Quote: Tiras
              Of course. Let's.
              The first and significant resolution on the Crimea.
              Who voted with Russia against the resolution? Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Cuba, Nicaragua, Syria, Sudan. See China there? India?
              China and India abstained that, given the dictates of the United States to the UN, it is equivalently “against.”
              1. Strips
                Strips 25 December 2017 12: 49 New
                +2
                Quote: Nyrobsky
                China and India abstained that, given the dictates of the United States to the UN, it is equivalently “against.”


                Is China Subordinate to US Dictatorship? Really? Why did they abstain for the first time, and then voted against?

                Well, the funny thing is, Israel did not vote for the first resolution on the Crimea. Specially did not vote. Where was the US dictatorship of Israel? laughing
                1. Nyrobsky
                  Nyrobsky 25 December 2017 13: 10 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Tiras
                  Is China Subordinate to US Dictatorship? Really? Why did they abstain for the first time, and then voted against? Well, the funny thing is, Israel did not vote for the first resolution on the Crimea. Specially did not vote. Where was the US dictatorship of Israel?

                  The US dictatorship in the United Nations in this context does not consist in exerting pressure on any particular country, but in general, exerting pressure on the organization itself and trying to reduce its activity to serving the interests of the USA. The fact that China or Israel had options to “abstain”, “for” or “against” does not at all mean that they cannot decide on a solution, since both China and Israel have their own territorial problems, the solution of which they can run into "Alverds" from Russia as a party with a veto, and therefore their position is more neutral.
                2. Iaaa
                  Iaaa 25 December 2017 13: 31 New
                  +4
                  [quote = Tiras] China obeys US dictatorship? [/ quote]
                  You just juggle. Where did you see in the post of Nyrobsky’s colleague about the US dictate over China? Read, he writes in Russian- [quote] with the existing US dictate to the UN [/ quote] Not attentive You are ours !!!!! laughing lol
              2. Mikhail Filippov
                Mikhail Filippov 26 December 2017 12: 28 New
                0
                China has a dofig of contacts with both the United States and Russia. Plus they themselves have a dofig of interests (mainly their sphere is Asia and Africa). Europe is not their "sphere of influence" (and Ukraine geographically is Europe).
          3. Mikhail Filippov
            Mikhail Filippov 26 December 2017 12: 26 New
            0
            I would not say that China supports Russia or anybody at all. He is always neutral. He looks, he is "for the winner." He will see how all this butting ends - and will demand different buns for his "moral support"
            1. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 26 December 2017 22: 37 New
              +1
              Quote: Mikhail Filippov
              I would not say that China supports Russia or anybody at all. He is always neutral. He looks, he is "for the winner." He will see how all this butting ends - and will demand different buns for his "moral support"

              No, Misha, you’re wrong. China until recently, like a magnet, was dragging American production onto its territory due to the availability of excess cheap labor. Everything suited everyone - the American capitalist saved on paying salaries and received extra profits, while the Chinese communist provided jobs and calmly watched the capitalist become dependent on a bias of ideologies. Against this background, the Chinese communist received extra money with which he credited the capitalist and gradually deprived him of the breadth of action in the direction of crushing the Chinese Communist Party, more than a trillion bucks invested in US debt securities is a serious argument for the capitalist. Now that the capitalist has come to his senses and decided that it was time to dictate to the communist how to “weaken” correctly, he set out to cut off the communist from the sea, by which China’s trade turnover reaches 85%. EIGHTY FIVE! Misha. This is a serious addiction and threat. However, it is resolved on the condition of friendship with Russia. The overland delivery of Chinese goods on the roads of Russia to the ports of Europe, and accordingly further, is reduced from 1,5 - 2 months to 10-15 days. Hence your statement that ...
              Quote: Mikhail Filippov
              Europe is not their "sphere of influence"

              absolutely not true. It is very much in their interests, but not in the interests of the United States, which is why they are starting a butting with China.
              1. Mikhail Filippov
                Mikhail Filippov 27 December 2017 09: 22 New
                0
                Not them. Their sphere of influence is Asia and Africa (you think whose protege Mugabe or their new president? USA? How could it not be). Move on. China is the main holder of US debt.
                As for production, China is a self-sufficient country. He has his own production. But the United States should be worried if China expels them. China is essentially the 3rd pole
        2. The comment was deleted.
  2. svp67
    svp67 25 December 2017 10: 29 New
    +4
    Well, they decided who needs Washington’s money more, and who is more afraid of the wrath of the United States than the wrath of the Arabs. And what about the "banana allies" who have Russia or the United States?
    1. Strips
      Strips 25 December 2017 11: 29 New
      +2
      Russia will stop supplying at a discount the resources of Belarus and others, and suddenly a friend of Russia, the fraternal people will turn their faces to the West. Friends of Russia will quickly become thinner.
      1. svp67
        svp67 25 December 2017 11: 42 New
        +1
        Quote: Tiras
        Russia will stop supplying at a discount the resources of Belarus and others, and suddenly a friend of Russia, the fraternal people will turn their faces to the West.

        You know, of course, not everything is “rosy” there, but Lukashenko is not I. idiot. He perfectly understands how it is PERSONAL for him SUCH to end, and with the rest, it’s high time to switch to the primacy of Russia's interests.
        1. Strips
          Strips 25 December 2017 11: 52 New
          +4
          Quote: svp67
          You know, of course, not everything is “rosy” there, but Lukashenko is not I. idiot.


          About Ukraine, too, they said so.

          Remember how Lukoshenko put almost ultimatums of Russia and Russia had to submit?


          But his relatively new statement from March 2017
          A purely accounting approach - who owes what to anyone - is unacceptable in relations between countries - members of the Eurasian Union, said the head of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko. Otherwise, the oil and gas conflict will cost more than Russia than Belarus. Experts believe that Lukashenko’s words are a new attempt to play a card to exit the EAEU.

          President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko has noted another scandalous remarks addressed to the Russian leadership. He said that “accounting” should not “lie between the Russian and Belarusian sides.”

          “Medvedev must understand that if we pay (for Russian gas. -“ Gazeta.Ru ”) as in Europe, then he will also have to pay for something. And the price will be incredibly higher than the price of natural gas. It seemed to me, and I still think, that our relations with Russia are not bookkeeping, ”BelTA quotes the head of Belarus.

          https://m.gazeta.ru/business/2017/03/09/10565339.
          shtml
      2. Iaaa
        Iaaa 25 December 2017 11: 50 New
        +4
        Quote: Tiras
        Friends of Russia will quickly become thinner.

        Oh! And as Israel then "free" loves the United States, as it loves ......
        US to provide Israel $ 38 billion of military assistance in 10 years

        15 September 2016
        US and Israel conclude largest military assistance agreement ahead of US election
        The United States and Israel reached a final agreement on the provision of a new package of US military assistance for a period of 10 years, which is the largest commitment in the field of bilateral military assistance in US history. Its signing was planned late Wednesday night in the United States. Israel will receive approximately $ 3,8 billion in aid each year. In the agreement, which expires in 2018, this amount was $ 3,1 billion. Earlier, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put forward a demand to increase aid to $ 4,5 billion per year. But in the final agreement, in addition to reducing the amount, Israel had to refuse to receive additional funds from the US Congress and agree to a gradual transition to the purchase of only American military equipment.

        For previous years, the dimensions of "gratuitous" love lead? Love is good, for 3c kopecks of green lard per year. Ay, good.
        1. Strips
          Strips 25 December 2017 12: 44 New
          +1
          And now the curtain is over - Israel did not vote on the first and most significant resolution regarding the Crimea, despite all the US buns. good
          Do you know why? Because Israel, when it needs to, goes against the will of the United States.


          You forget that Israel buys for this money in the USA and thereby helps the US military-industrial complex. Moreover, Israel is losing even more economically because it is not opening up production. This money is beneficial for Israel because it is beneficial for the US to give it to Israel, and Israel in exchange gets access to purchases of things that it does not have or does not have the economic benefit of their production such as airplanes, as well as technology. Therefore, purely money is not beneficial to Israel at all.
          1. Iaaa
            Iaaa 25 December 2017 13: 35 New
            +2
            Quote: Tiras
            You forget that Israel buys for the money in the United States

            Very interesting commerce! good good good what
      3. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 25 December 2017 12: 36 New
        +2
        Quote: Tiras
        Russia will stop supplying at a discount the resources of Belarus and others, and suddenly a friend of Russia, the fraternal people will turn their faces to the West. Friends of Russia will quickly become thinner.
        Well, that will be their choice. However, as the history of "withdrawals" shows, not a single country that has joined Europe or has come under the external control of the United States has not begun to live better, but, on the contrary, has suffered enormous economic damage, having lost political, financial and economic independence. The economic “miracle” of the Baltic states ended with the end of financing programs for the destruction of energy-generating capacities, electronics, the automotive industry, industry and the navy, which made them completely dependent on the new owners. The same is observed on Urkain, which, moreover, without having become a full member of the European Union, is rapidly catching up with Somalia.
        1. Mikhail Filippov
          Mikhail Filippov 26 December 2017 12: 31 New
          0
          Well, why - South Korea lives well this way, although for a long time it was called the country of thatched roofs.
    2. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 25 December 2017 13: 24 New
      +1
      and who fears the wrath of the United States more than the wrath of the Arabs.

      They have not yet known him, a dozen terrorist attacks and will immediately fall down, although in principle Guatemalans are too few to take seriously ...
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 25 December 2017 10: 32 New
    +3
    .
    Guatemala after the United States decided to transfer the embassy to Jerusalem
    the owner’s order is not discussed, and even more so a direct hint of financing ... so the "dull" ones were drawn ... laughing
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 25 December 2017 10: 34 New
    +7
    As they hurried ahead of the engine, fearing Trump's threats about financing. Guatemala is the stronghold of American "democracy." The world is bewildered - if Guatemala itself has decided, then what remains for the rest to do as soon as they grieve about the “wrong decision”?
  5. sir_obs
    sir_obs 25 December 2017 10: 35 New
    +2
    Industry - sugar, clothing, oil production.

    Exports ($ 7,8 billion in 2008): coffee, sugar, oil, bananas, fruits and vegetables.

    The main buyers are the USA 39,4%, El Salvador 12,6%, Honduras 9,5%, Mexico 6,6%, Nicaragua 4,2%.


    Import ($ 13,4 billion in 2008): fuel, cars and vehicles, construction materials, grain, fertilizers, electricity.


    They with the states have a surplus even of small supplies. So, that it cannot be otherwise, they will strangle right away if that.

    The main suppliers are the USA 37,1%, Mexico 9,8%, China 5,8%, El Salvador 4,8%.
    1. den3080
      den3080 25 December 2017 10: 49 New
      +1
      Honduras is also worried)))
      1. omit
        omit 25 December 2017 19: 12 New
        +1
        Do not scratch Honduras - he is for us! hi
  6. gukoyan
    gukoyan 25 December 2017 10: 36 New
    +1
    Satellites / puppets for dad went)))
  7. Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 25 December 2017 10: 36 New
    +4
    Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales Decides to Move Israel to Jerusalem

    And the whole world started.
  8. Azhıldıptır
    Azhıldıptır 25 December 2017 10: 39 New
    +1
    Guatemala is an American mongrel.
    And Israel is the same.
  9. Krasnodar
    Krasnodar 25 December 2017 10: 43 New
    0
    In 15 years, the embassies of the bulk of the countries will be in Jerusalem.
    Arabs for a couple of years sluggishly boil over and calm down.
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 25 December 2017 11: 06 New
      +1
      And you do not feed them, so that you do not sulk in vigor! wassat
  10. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 25 December 2017 10: 45 New
    +5
    Any sovereign state has the right to freely choose the place of its diplomatic representation in a friendly country. Point.
    The idea of ​​a Jerusalem resolution distracts from the fact that the main potential losers in the big game of the Middle East are the Palestinians. The central and explosive conflict line in the region is now the struggle for supremacy in the region between the Sunni forces of Saudi Arabia, on the one hand, and the Islamic Republic of Iran, on the other.

    In other words, Saudi Arabia and other states of the Persian Gulf, although they came out with loud protests, however, they absolutely not interested in exacerbating the conflict with Israel. On the contrary, they are in search of an opportunity to quickly get rid of the ill-fated Palestinian problem, so that it no longer hinders their conclusion of a desired strategic alliance with Israel against their sworn enemy of Iran.
    1. den3080
      den3080 25 December 2017 10: 55 New
      +3
      Any sovereign state has the right to freely choose the place of its diplomatic representation in a friendly country. Point.

      Who blundered such stupidity? (similar to quote)
      1. Going
        Going 25 December 2017 11: 05 New
        +5
        Not a weak knot there is tied up, the US is trying to put together a coalition against Iran.
    2. sir_obs
      sir_obs 25 December 2017 10: 57 New
      0
      And how long is Guatemala friends with you?
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 25 December 2017 11: 09 New
        +5
        Quote: sir_obs
        And how long is Guatemala friends with you?

        Long. From 1954 year. Guatemala became the first country to open its embassy accredited to Israel in Jerusalem in 1955. The embassy has worked in this city for about 30 years. In 1980, under pressure from Arab countries, it was transferred to Tel Aviv. In 1958, one of the streets in Jerusalem was named after Guatemala, while in the city of Guatemala there is a square named after the State of Israel.
        1. sir_obs
          sir_obs 25 December 2017 11: 22 New
          +2
          Long. Since 1954

          Curiously, from the beginning of the 30s, Guatemala was friends with Hitler Germany.
          Wow, how.
          In the 1930s, Germany became Guatemala's largest foreign trade partner after the United States - one third of Guatemala's exports and imports. However, in December 1941, Guatemala was forced, following the United States, to declare war on the Axis countries - Germany, Italy and Japan. Guatemala did not participate in hostilities, only stopped trade with these countries. The key sovereign word is forced.

          Somehow, Israel was still not in sight, and Guatemala was already in full swing sovereign under state control.
          While Germany squeezed Europe out, Guatemala continued to cooperate with it, until the states banned it. A very "sovereign" country. Well, just like all American friends.
          1. Strips
            Strips 25 December 2017 11: 45 New
            +5
            Quote: sir_obs
            While Germany squeezed Europe out, Guatemala continued to cooperate with it, until the states banned it. A very "sovereign" country. Well, just like all American friends.


            I think it will not be superfluous to remind you of the German-Soviet trade agreement (1939) and to what date it was implemented wink
            1. sir_obs
              sir_obs 25 December 2017 11: 52 New
              +2
              When Germany began to jerk Chekhov, the Soviet Union offered help, send troops and beat the Germans brain. But even the allies in the face of the British and their friends did not want to, and the Poles threatened so much that they would shoot down our planes.
              Well there is no way.
              It will not be superfluous to recall in the general context of events.
          2. omit
            omit 25 December 2017 19: 16 New
            +1
            sir_obs
            "Curiously, since the beginning of the 30s, Guatemala was friends with Nazi Germany."
            The USSR, too, at one time was friends with Germany, Hitler.
    3. hohol95
      hohol95 25 December 2017 11: 07 New
      +2
      Is it after the events of June 1954 Guatemala SOVEREIGN STATE?
      Is it after Operation UNITED FRUIT that their democracy is “exuberant” and “fragrant”?
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 25 December 2017 12: 31 New
        +4
        It was then that the phrase "banana republic" came into use. The first "banana" state was, in fact, Guatemala.
    4. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 25 December 2017 13: 28 New
      0
      Any sovereign state

      This state is as "sovereign" as the outskirts.
  11. hohol95
    hohol95 25 December 2017 11: 04 New
    +1
    OPERATION "UNITED FRUIT".
    Guatemala. June 1954
    Under the yoke of the banana octopus

    Octopus - DOES NOT RELEASE its victims !!!
  12. Herculesic
    Herculesic 25 December 2017 11: 05 New
    +1
    To transfer the capital of Guatemala to the USA to any town to show how there is no independent Guatemala!
    1. sir_obs
      sir_obs 25 December 2017 11: 09 New
      0
      From 1960 to 1996, civil war raged in Guatemala. The rebels from the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Union were supported by Cuba and Nicaragua, and the government of Guatemala gained the support of Argentina and the United States. In December, 1996, representatives of the government and the guerrilla command signed the “Treaty of lasting and lasting peace”, which ended the civil war.
      If anything, the staff can re-arrange everything.
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 25 December 2017 11: 30 New
        +3
        Quote: sir_obs
        From 1960 to 1996, civil war raged in Guatemala. The rebels from the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Union were supported by Cuba and Nicaragua, and the government of Guatemala gained the support of Argentina and the United States. In December, 1996, representatives of the government and the guerrilla command signed the “Treaty of lasting and lasting peace”, which ended the civil war.
        If anything, the staff can re-arrange everything.

        "The rebels from the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Union supported Cuba and Nicaragua" - read the USSR. That says it all.
        1. sir_obs
          sir_obs 25 December 2017 11: 39 New
          0
          This only says that the Americans staged a civil war there in order not to lose their control over the territory, so that Guatemala remained "sovereign" under their control, Nothing new since then. Guatemala was not the first and not the last.
          1. A. Privalov
            A. Privalov 25 December 2017 13: 59 New
            +3
            Quote: sir_obs
            This only says that the Americans staged a civil war there in order not to lose their control over the territory, so that Guatemala remained "sovereign" under their control, Nothing new since then. Guatemala was not the first and not the last.

            All it says is that the USSR organized a civil war there in order to gain control over the territory, so that Guatemala would become "sovereign" under its control, nothing new since then. Guatemala was not the first and not the last. hi
  13. gorenina91
    gorenina91 25 December 2017 11: 12 New
    +1
    -And where is the obliging "brotherly" Bulgaria ..? -Something she's late ...
    1. Polite Moose
      Polite Moose 25 December 2017 11: 31 New
      0
      Quote: gorenina91
      -And where is the obliging "brotherly" Bulgaria ..? -Something she's late ...

      Wait for the pipe to settle completely
  14. iouris
    iouris 25 December 2017 11: 22 New
    0
    Trump divided his friends into "good" and "bad."
  15. Professor
    Professor 25 December 2017 11: 23 New
    +8
    Well, here is Guatemala. It seems that the Czech Republic and Romania are also “weighing” the transfer of their embassies to Jerusalem. Personally, I am against. They would sit in Tel Aviv or as the embassy of Sudan in Herzliya and would not occupy the center of Jerusalem. And getting to Tel Aviv is much easier for us than to Jerusalem.

    PS
    What will Erdogan say to this? Did not consult with him? Just kidding. No one asked his opinion. laughing
    1. Des10
      Des10 25 December 2017 12: 02 New
      0
      Why don’t you drive the Arabs out of Israel?
      1. Professor
        Professor 25 December 2017 12: 08 New
        +2
        Quote: Des10
        Why don’t you drive the Arabs out of Israel?

        What for? request They are citizens of Israel and we strive for the ethnic purity of our country.
        1. Des10
          Des10 25 December 2017 13: 54 New
          0
          Quote: Professor
          They are citizens of Israel and we strive for the ethnic purity of our country.

          Somehow somehow. However - here everyone really thinks up - either a hidden message to them, or you have one purity with them.
    2. kpotr
      kpotr 25 December 2017 12: 30 New
      0
      You forgot about Lebanon, they were going to open the embassy, ​​but Erdogan was going to transfer the embassy to Jerusalem.
    3. Oleg7700
      Oleg7700 25 December 2017 16: 48 New
      +1
      This vanity is also incomprehensible to me - in principle, this is already almost one metropolitan area, (from the 6 freeway to the outskirts of the capital, 40 km on 1 highway, with excellent communications, already underground railways) Ambassadors' residences are often far beyond the noisy capitals, in quiet suburbs, again families, the sea, the lack of multiconfessional religious specificity in the cosmopolitan, "not sleeping" TA. Reception room with a sign "Ambassador" in the capital and quite ... good
  16. high
    high 25 December 2017 13: 14 New
    0
    It is strange that the forum users were so excited .... what does it matter to Russia, where does Guatemala transfer its Embassy.
    I am more concerned about 90th place of wealthy Russia in the world in terms of living, next to the poorest countries, than where the Guatemalan Embassy is located .....
    I am worried about the difficult life of my retired friends with whom I studied, asking, to reduce, the cost of Israeli carrots and radishes sold in Moscow.
  17. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 25 December 2017 13: 17 New
    +2
    It is easier and cheaper for them to move their embassy to the American toilet cubicle and move with it. laughing
  18. Evil 55
    Evil 55 25 December 2017 14: 53 New
    0
    Guatemala is a terribly cool state .. Yes, and Jimmy Morales’s language is also clearly like Trump.
  19. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 25 December 2017 15: 04 New
    0
    Among the first was specifically paid skin. It is he who receives all the preferences and payments. Well, the people of Guatemala (all Indians) - as expected, the all-American salute and greetings.
    PS Now everyone who knows how to see, hear and read all over the world, and not just in Guatemala, knows that Jimmy Morales is ..........., but he has more money. This is freedom of opinion, son! (Carl, if you please, although this bunch is too new).
  20. faterdom
    faterdom 25 December 2017 17: 44 New
    +1
    And who knows the capital of Guatemala? A very amazing name - Guatemala!
    So, the capital of Israel should be the city of Israel!
    But what is morales? Just some kind of amorals!
  21. assa67
    assa67 25 December 2017 18: 10 New
    +5
    gentlemen, Guatemala is among those countries that immediately supported phasington ..... not now the embassy is suffering a blow to the international community, who is left there ??? micronesia, honduras, nauru, that ... and more .... how already expressed "mustard banks, which they shove whoever wants and what they want" ...... they completely depend on Uncle Sam, where should they go? .... even the corrupt allies did not support ..... here the springboard itself declared- we are looking at the loot for those who don’t support kulamba in busyambu ...... "we are watching for votes, and we’ll save a lot on this .... we are all equal" ... from the springboard the quote is literal .. ..
  22. omit
    omit 25 December 2017 19: 23 New
    +1
    Who did not have time - he was late. There isn’t enough room for everyone, they will run the race. laughing
    1. Shahno
      Shahno 25 December 2017 19: 46 New
      +2
      Not a. Now, while preparing for the "fun starts".
      1. Oleg7700
        Oleg7700 25 December 2017 20: 35 New
        +1
        http://www.newsru.co.il/israel/25dec2017/slovaqui
        e_00.htm The Speaker of the Knesset has milled with the parliaments of Romania and Slovakia, and the Foreign Ministry declares ten people interested. But the price of land there, in the center, is breathtaking, maybe those who podsuyutnye know it in advance and received an "incredible discount" for courage, then they will push their "holy land" to the rich, they will move to 10% -20% to the outskirts, the difference will be divided "by check "...
  23. Alex Justice
    Alex Justice 25 December 2017 19: 53 New
    +3
    What is the problem, I do not understand. The two countries have agreed where the embassy will be. This is only their business.