How to upgrade the Tu-160М2 bomber

17
The Tu-160 rocket carrier is the flagship of the entire Russian aviation. A supersonic aircraft, which has no equal in the world, has tremendous modernization potential.

The updated Tu-160М2, which is established in Kazan, will surpass its predecessor in a number of indicators. New power plants, modern avionics, perfect aiming and navigation complex, as well as a new line of weapons will make an already formidable machine even more dangerous.

According to experts, the combat effectiveness of the aircraft should grow 2,5 times. It is planned that the new modification of the aircraft will receive a specially designed long-range cruise missile.

In addition to the flagship, upgrading are the strategic missile-carrying bombers Tu-95MS and long-range supersonic Tu-22М3. All of these machines were baptized in Syria.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    24 December 2017 15: 28
    and they weren’t “outdated” at all, as the “stubborn” judges ... before entering the air defense zone of others, Swans will do their White Cause ... Yes
  2. +2
    24 December 2017 16: 17
    It remains only to modernize the Soviet legacy! Since the scientific institutes hired high-tech production. I envy China soon he will be a monster in technology!
    1. +3
      24 December 2017 17: 42
      Quote: TPAKTOP
      It remains only to modernize the Soviet legacy

      Here it is not necessary, but. Strategic aircraft - serve for decades and their modernization is a common thing.
    2. +3
      24 December 2017 18: 31
      Quote: TPAKTOP
      I envy China soon he will be a monster in technology!

      belay Is there a Chinese science school? feel
      1. 0
        24 December 2017 19: 15
        You are my young friend of a campaign that you don’t know about Chinese industry) and live in 90 years)
        1. +2
          24 December 2017 19: 36
          Quote: TPAKTOP
          You, my young friend, don’t know what about China’s industry)

          I am not young, not a friend to you, and there is no purely Chinese scientific school (industry, this is not much else)
          Quote: TPAKTOP
          and live in 90 years)

          I lived there and remember very well! And so, it’s not customary to poke here ...
          1. 0
            24 December 2017 19: 57
            It is useless to prove to a distant man! Read, see smart people) not so long ago, tired of proving to one sofa expert that China squeezed us into third place in space.
            1. SOF
              0
              24 December 2017 23: 48
              Quote: TPAKTOP
              It is useless to prove to a distant man!

              ... really.
              And in the first place, of course, the United States, right? laughing
              ... well so be it lol
              "The giraffe is soooooooooo! You know better the pit."
              1. 0
                25 December 2017 00: 01
                Face the truth! And what is wrong ???
    3. +10
      25 December 2017 00: 12
      Quote: TPAKTOP
      I envy China soon he will be a monster in technology

      They still have to catch up and catch up.
      By the way - technology is not created in factories. And the same VIAM, for example, has not been canceled yet. And it, oddly enough, works.
      So the Chinese still ... as before China in the knee-elbow Yes
      1. 0
        25 December 2017 00: 34
        Ha ha far ??? Yes, no, it’s like to China ... I know how things really are
        1. +12
          25 December 2017 00: 37
          Quote: TPAKTOP
          Ha ha far ??? No, it’s like to China.

          Just for now, the engines that they rivet for their super-fighters do not reach the Russian resources ... if this is 5-10 Yes
          Peacocks Technology, say? Phe negative
          Quote: TPAKTOP
          I know how things really are

          Well, and know yourself further, what to shout?
          By the way, what do you "know" there? How are we doing? Or how are things in China? Or both?
          Simply, as a rule, the one who knows a lot speaks little.
          For you, this is somehow not yet determined ...
  3. 0
    24 December 2017 16: 27
    Three battalions of the VP, two at the VVB and one at the PMTO? And why did the Ivan Gren BDK go to the KSF, is it more needed in the pit at the Pacific Fleet and the KChF ....
  4. +2
    24 December 2017 17: 46
    ...................
    1. +2
      24 December 2017 18: 06
      The empirialists would like to see RUSSIA as a helpless girl, however
  5. +1
    25 December 2017 14: 36
    Quote: you Vlad
    Quote: TPAKTOP
    I envy China soon he will be a monster in technology!

    belay Is there a Chinese science school? feel

    Of course have! This is a copy school. In this they succeeded.
    1. +1
      26 December 2017 12: 23
      "ALL THEY HAVE PASSED BATTLE BAPTISM IN SYRIA" ...... The good old Tu22m3 in Afghanistan was still baptized, then Tajik-Afghan, 1st Chechen, 2nd, from November to December 99th unofficially in Afghanistan, in 2008. in Georgia, in 2012 - again Chechnya. “Soldier Aircraft” was so dubbed by the Dalniks. But the strategists had a debut, I agree.