Military Review

Stoltenberg believes that the creation of new missiles in the Russian Federation violates the INF Treaty

32
Russia's creation of 9М729 cruise missiles violates the provisions of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF), reports TASS Statement by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.




Russia, having carried out the development and (starting) deployment of a new cruise missile, violated the provisions of the INF Treaty. It should not be forgotten that the INF Treaty is the cornerstone of nuclear disarmament, since it involves the destruction of a whole category of missiles and weapons. This treaty is of great importance for the stability of Europe,
Stoltenberg said in an interview with the French newspaper Les Echos.

He noted that “even if in this case we are talking about a bilateral agreement (not including NATO), all the allied countries support it and remind Russia of the need to comply with this agreement in a transparent and verifiable manner.”

When asked if NATO perceives Russia as an enemy, he said:

The world is too complicated to divide it only into enemies and friends. Russia is our neighbor and will remain it. NATO does not want the emergence of a new cold war or a new arms race. Our approach to Russia is twofold: on the one hand, we are striving to demonstrate our unity and our awesome power. On the other hand, we are in favor of a political dialogue.


On Thursday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova commented on the US allegations that the 9М729 cruise missile entering the Russian Federation’s armament has a range that does not meet the requirements of the INF Treaty.

Now at this stage (the United States) have shifted to the accusations of Russia that the cruise missile 9М729 coming into service has a range that does not meet the requirements of the treaty. At the same time, as usual, the United States does not cite any evidence. We see the reason only in one thing: that there is simply no such evidence,
said Zakharova.

The missile named by the Americans, namely the ground-based cruise missile with the 9М729 index, fully meets the requirements of the treaty,
she emphasized.

The diplomat also pointed out that "the 9М729 rocket was not developed or tested for the range prohibited by the INF Treaty, and its deployment is carried out in strict accordance with Russian and international obligations."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Jedi
    Jedi 22 December 2017 13: 09 New
    +5
    Stoltenberg believes that the creation of new missiles in the Russian Federation violates the INF Treaty

    The henchman yapping in support of the owner.
    1. Shura Perm
      Shura Perm 22 December 2017 13: 12 New
      +2
      vague doubts torment me that the INF Treaty will fly away soon with a copper basin, so much hype in the press about this has risen ... wait and see if STAR WARS 2.0 awaits us ...
      1. jjj
        jjj 22 December 2017 13: 14 New
        +4
        When the dogs bark, the main thing is for the caravan to keep going. So here, few people say anything in the West. We must systematically do our job
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 22 December 2017 13: 16 New
          +1
          Stoltenberg is not military by training, he is a financier and a sales manager. He acts as a successful marketer. For this, the Pentagon holds it and the NATO Secretary General.
          What the Pentagon needs is Stoltenberg and voices!
      2. Shurik70
        Shurik70 22 December 2017 13: 20 New
        +5
        Yes, the United States has long violated this treaty.
        One MK41 accommodation in Romania is worth it. Moreover, the United States even scoffs, reporting that "these systems are charged with weak missiles" SM-3. But the Tomahawks are not even nearby in warehouses, but on ships as many as twenty kilometers away, who will work to drag and reload - there are none.
        It is necessary for us to create “single Iskanders” for firing for ten kilometers. And instruct in Syria. And what can be put on these installations a full-scale missile - so what are you, it's half an hour of work, who will work so hard.
      3. ul_vitalii
        ul_vitalii 23 December 2017 11: 21 New
        +6
        And doubts torment me too, it seems Iskander was tested in Syria under the guise of a mass attack with cruise missiles.
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 22 December 2017 13: 13 New
      +3
      Quote: Jedi
      Stoltenberg believes that the creation of new missiles in the Russian Federation violates the INF Treaty

      Russia believes that the lack of brains in the cranium violates Stoltenberg’s thinking process
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 79807420129
      79807420129 22 December 2017 13: 18 New
      +5
      Quote: Jedi
      The henchman yapping in support of the owner.

      At this henchman, the brains seem to have leaked into shoes, the INF Treaty was concluded between the USSR and the USA, and not with NATO, it only encourages popolis.
      1. Jedi
        Jedi 22 December 2017 13: 21 New
        +3
        Quote: 79807420129
        The INF Treaty was concluded between the USSR and the USA, and not with NATO, it only encourages popolis.

        He knows this:
        He noted that “even if in this case we are talking about a bilateral agreement (not including NATO), all the allied countries support it and remind Russia of the need to comply with this agreement in a transparent and verifiable manner.”

        but the owner needs to lick the ass, otherwise it will stop feeding. yes
    5. Blombirus
      Blombirus 22 December 2017 13: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: Jedi
      Stoltenberg believes that the creation of new missiles in the Russian Federation violates the INF Treaty

      The henchman yapping in support of the owner.

      It turns out Stolbtenberg knows how to count. It’s ridiculous. Parrot on a salary.
      1. Jedi
        Jedi 22 December 2017 13: 27 New
        +3
        Quote: BlombiRus
        It turns out Stolbtenberg knows how to count. It’s ridiculous. Parrot on a salary.

        Of course he can, but the salary must be recounted upon receipt. wink
    6. Kent0001
      Kent0001 23 December 2017 13: 41 New
      0
      This talking head of the USA also paves the way for their treaty to break out.
  2. Fedorov
    Fedorov 22 December 2017 13: 09 New
    +1
    This agreement is beneficial to the United States, but not to Russia. Yes, and ends in the 21st year. What will they sing then? After all, in Russia these missiles are de facto in the new generation, and the United States is not yet in sight. (Junk has already rotted). All the more so to China, Israel, India, Pakistan, the DPRK, this agreement is a shit, they did not sign it, respectively, do what they want.
    And the nomenclature full of rockets for Iskander is kept secret, what are the mattresses singing about? Or wake up in advance.
    1. Fedorov
      Fedorov 22 December 2017 13: 22 New
      +1
      Like the "Caliber" .. forgot to crush
  3. Egorovich
    Egorovich 22 December 2017 13: 11 New
    +2
    "Pravdorubets" from NATO - it sounds like something very fetid. And after all, it does not bother to carry the next, unproven heresy every time.
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 December 2017 13: 15 New
    0
    And what are they (NATO) related to the INF Treaty?
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 22 December 2017 13: 21 New
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And what are they (NATO) related to the INF Treaty?

      The fact of the matter is that the whole Nata (except the United States) can be armed with such missiles. And since The USA is in control, then it can calmly use them against Russia.
  5. HAM
    HAM 22 December 2017 13: 21 New
    0
    ".... we strive to demonstrate our unity and our awesome power ..."

    While they themselves are afraid of their own "awesome power .."!
    Missiles should be with a range of 499,9 km. Or 5001,0 km. - no violations.
  6. Fedorov
    Fedorov 22 December 2017 13: 35 New
    +1
    It is strange that they did not remember about the RS-26 Rubezh. And there from 2000 km. And it seems like he went to replace the “Topol”. And to bring down is not yet possible.
    1. Sergey53
      Sergey53 22 December 2017 13: 45 New
      0
      Boundary, or YRS-M, is still being tested for delivery to the armament in the project.
  7. Sergey53
    Sergey53 22 December 2017 13: 39 New
    0
    How he doesn’t want us to have them.
  8. masff2307
    masff2307 22 December 2017 13: 45 New
    0
    Often, reading the statements of Western "leaders", you understand - and they, in the West, have Goebbels’s business:
    "A lie repeated a thousand times becomes true."
  9. Alexex
    Alexex 22 December 2017 13: 50 New
    0
    The world is too complicated to divide it only into enemies and friends. Russia is our neighbor and will remain it. NATO does not want the emergence of a new cold war or a new arms race. Our approach to Russia is twofold: on the one hand, we are striving to demonstrate our unity and our awesome power. On the other hand, we are in favor of a political dialogue.

    Reminds 1941 year .... here ...
  10. solzh
    solzh 22 December 2017 14: 13 New
    0
    This zombie-like Russophobian gay man is starting to annoy. At least something new came up. Hoopoe (where instead of the first letter "d" the letter "p")
  11. fan_
    fan_ 22 December 2017 14: 28 New
    0
    CHAT I did not understand that we concluded a treaty with NATO ??? Let them not go into other people's affairs!
  12. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 22 December 2017 15: 04 New
    +2
    And who cares about Stoltenberg’s opinion.
  13. HEATHER
    HEATHER 22 December 2017 17: 12 New
    +1
    [b] Stoltenberg believes that the creation of new missiles in the Russian Federation violates the INF Treaty. But Russia believes that Stoltenberg should be checked by Russian psychiatrists. It is advisable in Lubyanka. These cr .... we can still cause problems. We need to take action. Well, I should advise the President to pour them a sedative with cyan. (This is blue paint) repeatLike in that movie. lol
  14. Lexus
    Lexus 22 December 2017 19: 33 New
    +1
    Oh well ... they don’t even take offense at such people.
  15. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 22 December 2017 20: 03 New
    +1
    "NATO does not want a new Cold War or a new arms race."
    I have to work through "I don't want".
    And for any NATO "awesome power" we have our own! And maybe even thicker. It’s for nothing that they jiggle like a louse on a scallop ..
  16. andron-30
    andron-30 22 December 2017 20: 25 New
    +1
    NATO has nothing to do with this treaty, therefore it is not for this typical person to give any estimates, the opinion of the organization of the killers of millions should not be of interest to Russia, just as NATO was not interested in the death of innocent people from their weapons.
  17. Romanych.by
    Romanych.by 23 December 2017 10: 59 New
    +1
    Yes, they do not care deeply what they consider there. It is time for us to “hammer” on foreign loud exclamations and with unflappable facial expressions to strengthen our defense and attacking power (just in case). repeat
  18. PValery53
    PValery53 23 December 2017 20: 49 New
    0
    "Stoltenberg believes that the creation of new missiles in the Russian Federation violates the INF Treaty"
    - Something this secretary general (almost homosexual) of NATO is too thick. He wants more money for weapons.