Military Review

Sentenced in the case of embezzlement of 400 million rubles from the budget of the Glonass-M program

39
Sentenced in respect of the former management of the PSC JSC “Russian Space Systems” and CJSC “Mercury”. Recall that the representatives of these companies associated with the rocket and space industry, were held as defendants in the case of the theft of almost 0,4 billion rubles. The embezzlement was carried out from the budget of the Glonass-M program.


The Ostankino Court of the city of Moscow convicted all defendants in the case under the article “Fraud on a large scale”. Igor Krylov, who appeared as the defendant, was sentenced to six years in a general regime colony. Three other defendants - Aleksey Diorditsa, Alexander Polyakov and Vitaly Tolmachyov - received four years in prison each. They will also serve punishment in colonies of general regime.

Sentenced in the case of embezzlement of 400 million rubles from the budget of the Glonass-M program


Initially, in the case of the embezzlement from the budget of the program of the satellite system "Glonass-M" passed the amount of 565 million rubles. Then the term embezzlement was replaced by “misuse”, and the amount was already considered in 400 million rubles.

The investigation was conducted by joint investigative groups of the FSB and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.

The appeal of the sentence is not reported.
Photos used:
Wikipedia
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. _Ugene_
    _Ugene_ 21 December 2017 12: 18
    23
    and who will return the money? served 4 years and all? moreover, everything will be released by udo in a couple of years
    1. Finches
      Finches 21 December 2017 12: 21
      20
      You need to shoot! Only mass shootings will scare someone at least a little ... And even that is not a fact!
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 21 December 2017 12: 24
        +7
        Quote: Finches
        It’s necessary to shoot! Only mass shootings will scare someone at least a little ..

        they shoot in China. do not stop stealing
        1. Finches
          Finches 21 December 2017 12: 27
          +6
          Quite right! Joseph Vissarionovich threw bundles of both the right and the guilty, but they still stole cars ... There is either a conscience or it is not, but, unfortunately, if there is no conscience, it is often such a person who makes an official career very quickly - as if walking up the corpses ... But such is the dialectic of the existing world order!
          1. LSA57
            LSA57 21 December 2017 12: 30
            14
            Quote: Finches
            There’s either a conscience or it’s not there,

            I think one of the measures could be the confiscation of all property from all the next of kin. I understand, it’s illegal, but if you want to at least somehow reduce the theft, you can go to the constitutional amendments
            1. Finches
              Finches 21 December 2017 12: 37
              +3
              Humanity has been fighting corruption since the founding of the states! So far, Singapore has defeated it more or less because everyone knows each other in person! The United States has not steamed, it has legitimized it in the form of lobbying ... China shoots, and even that, it’s not particularly fighting corruption, but regulates the population and pushes the work of social elevators! laughing
              1. Star
                Star 21 December 2017 23: 11
                +1
                In the United States, the entire bribe is given to the reporting person.
                To remember, we made a proposal to the State Duma, but they responded to it in the State Duma as follows:
                Are you suggesting that we from all over the country make the country of informers.
                Unfortunately I remember it verbatim.
            2. ProkletyiPirat
              ProkletyiPirat 21 December 2017 13: 52
              0
              Quote: LSA57
              confiscation of all property from all immediate relatives

              begin to write to friends, like, "let me write to you 100 million and you have the same amount for me." So that will not help.
              There are more reliable means, but in order to introduce them, you need to make a lot of efforts on the part of the state, for example, apply the concept of “rating” or “index of social responsibility / utility”, there are many options, and there are even more names. The principle of operation is a bit confusing. But the essence is simple, all individuals and legal entities receive alphanumeric ratings. And with a low rating, a person will not be able to occupy certain public positions, with a low rating of a company, she will not be able to receive a state order, and in a tender of two companies with different ratings, one who has a higher rating may be given preference even if she lost the tender in other respects. Again, people and organizations with a higher rating receive relief in taxes and in laws and much more. As a result, after years (no less than 5 no more than 30), all people and firms will receive a history-reputation and thus all schemes based on one-day firms and dummies will become a thing of the past. But unfortunately at the moment the constitution of the Russian Federation prohibits such a system.
              1. signifera
                signifera 21 December 2017 14: 02
                +3
                All the "necessary" firms and officials will immediately have a rating of 100500)))))) this is Russia. Will not help. .))
                1. ProkletyiPirat
                  ProkletyiPirat 21 December 2017 14: 58
                  +1
                  Quote: Signifer
                  All the "necessary" firms and officials will immediately have a rating of 100500)))))) this is Russia. Will not help. .))

                  That's why I pointed out "As a result, years later (not less than 5 not more than 30) all people and firms will get a reputation story. "Well, he bureaucrats money, does it through a front company, of course, as now there isn’t enough evidence to put everyone down, but the rating will still go down. Then they will again be stolen through another company in another place, the rating will drop again. And at that moment another company will honestly raise the rating. As a result, at a certain moment we will have first a bureaucrat with a negative one, second a company with a negative rating, third one a one-day company with a zero rating, and a firm with a large positive rating. As a result, government agencies see who needs to be checked first and who needs to be monitored. And in the case of an honest tender organizer, he can send the winner of the tender and pay more money but to a trusted organization. the manager will be changed to “not fair”, this will immediately be reflected in her rating, because the rating of a company is calculated, including on the basis of the rating of her employees. they can get a job in companies with a negative or zero rating, because in the case of a jamb their rating will fall, and who, for example, would like to increase their rent due to a thief of a robber of the state who stole the state? And again, all this will concern only financial flows associated with the state. If a private trader heats a private trader, then the state doesn’t care at all according to the law without ratings, but if a private trader heats a private trader who works for the state, the rating is triggered. Again, if the company heats another state or a foreign company, then nothing will happen to them. It will be more accurate, but strictly according to the law, without ratings ... And this is only an economic application. And there is also a state one, for example, if the company helped the special services “for free or a small bribe”, although it might not have done so. That special services can raise the rating of the company. Or for example, there is a person who knows about the fraud but is silent, and here he is offered to reduce taxes and the rent for information on fraud, albeit by a little, by 1000 rubles a year, but this is until the end of his life with the same rating. Or, for example, you come to the police and say, “My car was stolen!”, And they honestly tell you, “we accepted your statement, but you see this girl, she was stolen from her hamster, and so she has a rating of +10, and you have -50, so we first find the hamster, and then we will look for your car. " And no one will care about your screams and threats, and even if you prove that the hamster was not stolen, he himself escaped from the cage that the girl forgot to close, all the investigators will not give a damn about it, because their bosses will report more strongly to the request from a person with a higher rating than your bid is negative.
        2. To be or not to be
          To be or not to be 21 December 2017 13: 15
          +3
          "10 people were publicly executed for drug trafficking, robbery, and murder at a stadium in Lufeng, China. Sentencing criminals was announced right before the eyes of thousands of spectators."
          The state must protect itself and its citizens ...
        3. passing
          passing 21 December 2017 14: 03
          +1
          Quote: LSA57
          Quote: Finches
          It’s necessary to shoot! Only mass shootings will scare someone at least a little ..

          they shoot in China. do not stop stealing

          An exceptional measure of social protection will not be returned, but confiscation before cowards
          "at mother-in-law" including, leave only social norms. This will hold the thieves, but the status of judges must be lowered, otherwise they will become more fat on this.
          I will not talk about all the judges of course, but most are something.
      2. Sergey53
        Sergey53 21 December 2017 12: 45
        +7
        Quote: Finches
        You need to shoot! Only mass shootings will scare someone at least a little ... And even that is not a fact!

        It should be easier. Stole, misappropriated, etc. to debt prison. Until the full amount is returned, you sit. He returned and left. Without the right to appeal, amnesties, and the right to hold positions in government agencies LIFE. Then this bacchanalia will end. Since you can’t use the assigned.
        1. ProkletyiPirat
          ProkletyiPirat 21 December 2017 13: 55
          0
          Quote: Sergey53
          Since you can’t use the assigned.

          That is, the scheme "substitute a neighbor, he’s not to blame himself, but pay him" will not work for you anymore?
          1. Sergey53
            Sergey53 21 December 2017 21: 30
            0
            So in the "hole" after the evidence base.
    2. Grandfather
      Grandfather 21 December 2017 12: 21
      +5
      the amount of 565 million rubles
      against the theft of billions, it doesn’t look huge anymore ... maybe they won’t return, they’ll leave, their health will go to the Cote d'Azur.
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 21 December 2017 12: 33
        0
        maybe they won’t return

        So it will be ... Officials always get sick and spend heavily on medicines before the "landing."
    3. Evil543
      Evil543 21 December 2017 12: 22
      +4
      And China would be sentenced to death
      1. _Ugene_
        _Ugene_ 21 December 2017 12: 23
        +4
        the death penalty is a bust, but 25 years would have been given with confiscation, another thing
        1. Vita vko
          Vita vko 21 December 2017 12: 47
          +1
          Quote: _Ugene_
          25 would give with confiscation, another thing

          that's just the qualification of the criminal case "misuse of funds" does not at all reflect real damage. In the defense industry, any financial or technological violation must qualify as an "attempt on the sovereignty and security of the state" or as a betrayal of the homeland. And in what way the damage was done, this is the tenth thing and should go together as a trailer.
      2. LSA57
        LSA57 21 December 2017 12: 25
        +1
        Quote: Evil543
        And China would be sentenced to death

        so we don’t have it
    4. Chertt
      Chertt 21 December 2017 12: 26
      +2
      Well, they earned a little, 20 lyam per year of imprisonment. For officials, quite modestly.
    5. Blombirus
      Blombirus 21 December 2017 12: 28
      +5
      After a maximum of half a year, all the defendants will be free to drink honey and drink on warm islands and laugh over the incorruptible Themis. But! The media will not tell us about this! They are modestly silent.
    6. Labrador
      Labrador 21 December 2017 12: 48
      +1
      Sentence - a guide to action.
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 21 December 2017 12: 21
    +7
    Then the term theft was replaced by "misuse"
    and then generally the term "premium"! repeat
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 21 December 2017 12: 24
    +8
    6 and 4 years of general regime for the theft of 400 million from the rocket and space industry? Really humane in the opinion of “human rights defenders,” but is it fair? I don’t understand anything already in the decision of the Russian courts when sentencing.
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 21 December 2017 12: 35
      +3
      but why is it incomprehensible? ... who shares, that and lards can ... for such a conditional term ...
  4. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 21 December 2017 12: 24
    +5
    Fines, confiscations hde ???
    Raven crow, eye will not peck ... (
  5. Petr1
    Petr1 21 December 2017 12: 33
    0
    So, the investigators took 100 militia for themselves, they will correct the poor budget at least. 165 the first prisoner takes it for himself, so the term is 6 years, well, the rest are one hundred and everyone is happy.
    1. askort154
      askort154 21 December 2017 12: 48
      +2
      Peter 1.....So, the investigators took 100 militia ...


      "To steal, so a million ....." is an expression of the 20th century. In the 21st century, it no longer rolls. Now law enforcement officers are fighting for justice - steal so that there is enough for everyone. yes
  6. Egorovich
    Egorovich 21 December 2017 12: 38
    +2
    We are being sentenced to death in Russia in some way, and one of the defendants, rabble Sugrobova, was even reduced by ten years. We need a complete confiscation of property for such crimes and nothing else.
  7. morituri
    morituri 21 December 2017 12: 45
    +2
    I don’t understand. Damage to the state ... And who will compensate it? Why without confiscation?
  8. Nemesis
    Nemesis 21 December 2017 12: 52
    +4
    This is a mockery of justice ... 4 years are given for the theft of bottles of vodka from a stall ... For such crimes it is necessary to execute, with confiscation of property
  9. Blackbeard
    Blackbeard 21 December 2017 12: 53
    0
    And there is money, just someone stole it wassat
  10. armourer
    armourer 21 December 2017 14: 02
    0
    Quote: Finches
    Quite right! Joseph Vissarionovich threw bundles of both the right and the guilty, but they still stole cars ... There is either a conscience or it is not, but, unfortunately, if there is no conscience, it is often such a person who makes an official career very quickly - as if walking up the corpses ... But such is the dialectic of the existing world order!

    It’s not necessary to kill a lot of mind, but how to punish correctly is the question. And planting is expensive. Confiscation is complete and amputated by the elbows, without invalidation to live and remember that he stole from the state
  11. CAPTIVE
    CAPTIVE 21 December 2017 17: 14
    +3
    Little was stolen to see, the sentence is "very harsh" .. (laughter through tears). angry
    Today is the birthday of I.V. Stalin, they could, as an exception, shoot prokhindeys ..

    So our rockets fall, etc. thieves and swindlers around Russia are booming!
  12. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 21 December 2017 18: 02
    +2
    This I understand! So they need it! Finally, the punishing hand of liberal justice overtook them! And the deadlines are so tough, I would even say cruel! And the mode is some kind of common fund! Oh, and it will be hard for them, they repent a hundred% more than once in a long time! They are running doggy, comrades! Bravo ... and pah!
  13. osoboye_mneniye
    osoboye_mneniye 21 December 2017 22: 00
    0
    "Igor Krylov, who was the defendant, was sentenced to six years in a general regime colony. Three other defendants - Aleksey Diorditsa, Alexander Polyakov and Vitaly Tolmachev - were sentenced to four years in prison. They will also serve their sentences in a general colony."
    And before they would have been shot for treason ...
  14. Star
    Star 21 December 2017 23: 00
    +1
    Ahrenet ...
    0.1 billion in four years, not sickly "earned."
    I have such a salary .....