Military Review

The West is dreaming not only of "pacification", but of the dismemberment of Russia

60
The "Western world", in the 90-s of the last century, threw all its forces to the destruction of the USSR, was that in this case the role of Russia in it and its potential in the future were critically underestimated. The collapse of the Union and the formation of "post-Soviet" "independent states" on its wreckage there was considered sufficient to establish its full hegemony in the world "for all time." And cruelly miscalculated.


Lately, something has often begun to voice the dreams of "disintegration" or "disintegration" of Russia. And let the delusional statements most often come from the lips of political marginalized, like a tightly "thumped" deputy minister for the "temporarily occupied territories and internally displaced persons of Ukraine" Georgy Tuka, who blurted out: "Politically, in the future, Russia will remain the enemy of independent Ukraine, therefore our task is to strive to divide Russia into parts, or Mustafa Dzhemilev, an unintelligent Crimean-Tatar "incomprehensible-in-exile" Mustafa Dzhemilev, who dreams that "Russia may fall apart tomorrow," says something about it.

All these "speakers" are categorically unable to speak "from themselves", and they have no right to their own opinion. They are only repeaters of the “general line” generated, of course, not at all in Kiev. At this point, forgive me - what the West has in mind is, then its poor lackeys in the language. And not only among those who entrenched themselves in the current edge of the ram, directed by the West against Russia, "nezalezhnoy." The “disintegration of Russia” is the favorite topic of all the most vile representatives of the Russian-speaking (I can’t give a different definition!) To “liberal democracy”.

That is broadcasting "the former Soviet intelligence officer, historian and writer Viktor Suvorov," and in fact - a pervert, traitor, liar and falsifier stories Bozhdashka Rezun:
"Russia is waiting for decay. I will not say when, but it will take a little time, and in the next interview we will say:" It's a pity, but what can you do. That is the story. ”There was a great socialist camp, and it crumbled. Then the great Soviet Union remained, but the same thing happened to it. This is a trend. Who’s next? After all, after the collapse of the socialist camp, nothing was done to stop it. down the hill, the Soviet Union crumbled, and again no attempt was made to prevent it. Disintegration continues. "

Here is the theme picked up by the "Famous human rights activist and former Soviet dissident." But in fact, a longtime Western agent, anti-Soviet and Russophobe, and besides, well, where are you going to get away with the truth! - pervert much more abruptly Rezun, Vladimir Bukovsky:
"Russia will inevitably collapse. And it will collapse not only along national borders, but also along economic lines. There is a crisis of the Russian state and this process is already inevitable. Most likely, Russia will not exist again as it is and it is just a matter of time."

Such an abomination can be cited as examples to infinity - but too disgusting. let us ask ourselves a better question: why is everyone so actively promoting the topic - from the "voices of the West" of the first magnitude to the small ridiculous liberals from the current Russian "demus", dreaming of the "Maidan" in Moscow and their colleagues from the "Nezalezhnaya" who do not know how to solve the consequences " Maidana "in Kiev?

The answer is simple - they voice the most ardent desire, the most vehement desire of the West today. The fact that, for sure, has already been laid down in all the doctrines of "confrontation" and "deterrence" of Russia, written and approved from Washington to Brussels. The West understands its fatal mistake with the USSR, and does not intend to repeat it with Russia. Then they seriously undertook the dismemberment of Russia only at the end of 1991 of the year, "swinging" Chechnya. According to the plan of the West, that war was supposed not only to bury the remnants of the Russian army, but also to give start to such a "parade of sovereignty", which the federal center would simply not be physically able to resist.

However, it did not work out, because the West overestimated Dudayev and his ilk, and didn’t take Putin into account at all. The man, whose coming to power, not only inexorably suppressed the disintegration of the country that had begun, but also began the process of raising it from its knees, they then “looked through”. Now they see him, they know him, they are mortally afraid and hate with fierce hatred. And therefore in the current confrontation with Russia they will act much tougher and sharper, without wasting time on the “buildup”.

The fact that this is an attempt to do just that will be, you can not doubt for a second. After all, the Americans themselves admit it! Here's former US Vice President Joe Biden and the same former Assistant US Deputy Secretary of Defense Michael Carpenter published a huge opus in Foreign Affairs. The main point of the pretentious and delirious article is that if in 90-ies the question of survival for the collective West (and above all - for the US) was to "triumph over Soviet totalitarianism", now the enemy №1 is Russia, which did not want " under the enlightened leadership of NATO and the EU, boldly begin the transition from dictatorship to democracy. " Russia today is “blatantly attacking the foundations of Western democracy around the world. Under President Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin launched a coordinated attack in many areas — military, political, economic, informational — using many open and hidden tools.”

In essence, these two retired drummers from the Washington goat are calling on the West to get it out of the closet. weapon and the armor of the Cold War, shake off the dust from them and, thus equipping themselves, go on a “crusade” - not only against communism, but against the Russians. Therefore - at least in Washington they expect to do the same tricks with Russia as with the USSR. And there is no doubt that its dismemberment into regions - “independent states”, which will no longer pose a danger to the West, is in the plans in the first place. Well, perhaps - the second, after the elimination of Vladimir Putin ...

In the West, they believe that there is every reason to hope for the success of such an enterprise. For example, Edward Lucas, senior vice president of the Center for European Policy Analysis, the editor of The Economist in the UK, said this summer:
"There is a potential for centrifugal forces that will tear the RF apart, just as it did with the Soviet Union"

Mr. Lucas believes that the RF will be “torn apart”, “... first of all, Tatarstan, Bashkiria, the North Caucasus, and especially Chechnya.” It is interesting to know what he thinks about this, for example, Ramzan Kadyrov ...

Britain, the United States, NATO ... They all understand perfectly well that they were bitterly mistaken, believing that it would be enough to leave "one Russia" from the Soviet Union, surrounding it with a ring of former "fraternal republics", for the most part, hostile. These gentlemen have always had a hard time with history, and therefore they somehow “did not take into account” the fact that the USSR rose from the Russian Empire. And today, the Kremlin has returned not only its emblem and banner.

They will not give a second chance to Russia. There is nowhere to retreat — it is worth giving up to the country, to stumble under those blows with which the West is today trying to shower it literally from all sides, and Russia will not just be put on its knees, but destroyed, as a single state. Making sure that it is impossible to arrange a “Maidan” or some other “color revolution” in Moscow in the near foreseeable future, the West will most likely rely on this scenario in its confrontation with us.
Alexander the Wild
Author:
Originator:
http://planet-today.ru/geopolitika/item/80370-zapad-mechtaet-uzhe-ne-prosto-ob-usmirenii-a-o-raschlenenii-rossii
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Chertt
    Chertt 21 December 2017 06: 16
    +3
    The West dreams of the collapse of Russia, we are about the second civil war in the United States, Ordinary Wishlist
    1. Finches
      Finches 21 December 2017 06: 25
      12
      This is the blue dream of the West since the time of Ivan the Terrible! Personally, I don’t think about any second civil war in the United States, I try not to think about the United States once again - my heartburn begins ... laughing
      1. maxim947
        maxim947 21 December 2017 08: 58
        +9
        Everything is written on the case, and this western dream of destroying our country must always be remembered. Only they themselves don’t need to help them, they don’t need to build power centers, they don’t need to divide society and thereby create tension, you don’t have to turn a blind eye to the impunity of “some” etc. etc.
        1. Mestny
          Mestny 21 December 2017 10: 58
          +2
          The authorities are simply compelled to do so, declaring our state free and democratic, that is, giving their citizens freedom of opinion. If you do not build these "centers" - the mass of people within Russia itself, dissatisfied with the authorities will even more radically begin to oppose it. There will be an additional weighty reason to shout about the totalitarian regime and the lack of freedom of speech.
          And so, all this is "steam whistle." The whistle in this case is precisely the “Yeltsin Center” for such alternatively gifted ones.
          By the way, if the "patriots" at all angles did not yell about this "center", few would know about it on a national scale.
          Why is the word "patriots" in this case in quotation marks? Yes, because these closure activists are calling for exactly the same thing as the creators of these centers - to overthrow the current government. Say, the government has betrayed its people by participating in such projects. Or even just not banning them.
          And what is interesting - both of them are sure that the authorities have not justified and do not justify the interests of the people.
          However, the result of the activities of both of these can be only one - the collapse of the country.
          And the authorities in this situation should maneuver and make decisions that are more or less able to satisfy most of the citizens.
          What does she actually do.
          1. Alone
            Alone 21 December 2017 11: 46
            +4
            Quote: Mestny
            And so, all this is "steam whistle."

            Nothing that schoolchildren and students take on compulsory excursions? Or do you think that these excursions for young people, who know about the 90s only from the stories of their parents, are not acquired by them?
        2. tv70
          tv70 23 December 2017 11: 36
          +1
          Yeah, still near the alcohol center, they want to build the center of a hunchbacked nits ...
      2. Chertt
        Chertt 21 December 2017 09: 31
        +2
        Quote: Finches
        I’m generally trying not to think about the USA once again - my heartburn is starting ...

        And you alternate. We thought about the USA - heartburn, We thought that there is no USA - joy wink
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS 21 December 2017 13: 44
        +4
        Quote: Finches
        This is the blue dream of the West since the time of Ivan the Terrible! Personally, I don’t think about any second civil war in the United States, I try not to think about the United States once again - my heartburn begins ... laughing

        But I don’t have no yes ... and for me the best defense is an attack. Why not work towards dismembering the US? Well, return Alaska with California ...
      4. iouris
        iouris 23 December 2017 14: 12
        +2
        Russia - the USSR is already divided.
        1. zoolu350
          zoolu350 25 December 2017 13: 03
          0
          That's right, and now there is the finishing of the debris. And the owners of the Fed in 90 did not abandon the idea of ​​destroying Russia permanently, but simply making sure that a good result was achieved in this area, concentrated their efforts in other areas (Yugoslavia, the Middle East).
      5. edge
        edge 23 December 2017 18: 18
        0
        Quote: Chertt
        West dreams of the collapse of Russia

        what wet dreams, like schoolchildren, poles began and the whole bed is in conchita, and to be honest, how many times have you received a hara, it’s time to realize the impossibility of your Wishlist
    2. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 21 December 2017 09: 23
      +8
      "The West is dreaming of the collapse of Russia,"
      This is not a dream for a long time, but the goal of the PURPOSE of Western policy ... with existing methods and plans (read the new US national security strategy). .with allocated funds (US $ 50 billion green) ..with informational (psycho-logical) war against Russia by the united media of the West .. with resources of 5 columns inside Russia and Russian anti-Russian media. its liberal conservative government and its program for the dibilization of the young generation and the social life of the people
      For a long time it’s not the West’s wishlist, but a real so far non-hot war
      1. dSK
        dSK 21 December 2017 11: 36
        +2
        Quote: To be or not to be
        real war so far

        В the new the US national security strategy openly named two US enemies, which are ranked: first China, then Russia. Brzezinski-Abamov’s democrats preferred the "left", cunning options and for Russia they would be more destructive if "ji-2", the "States-China" alliance were realized. Republicans are more "honest." Indeed, China with a five-fold population advantage and a rapid, unstoppable economic growth rate is a big threat to the United States. But by declaring China the enemy No. 1, the States make a great “gift” to Russia by burying the idea of ​​“Ji 2." Beijing and Moscow will be friends against Washington, as the takeover of North Korea expands the "bridgehead" for the further capture of Asia. And Russia, which agreed on the unification of Germany, will not yield to the DPRK. China doesn’t need this either. hi
        1. To be or not to be
          To be or not to be 21 December 2017 13: 43
          0
          dsk ,, "" In the new US national security strategy, two US enemies are openly named ""

          And as they called it. "" Revisionist forces .. "" "
          "" ".. The Strategy addresses key issues and trends that affect our position in the world, including:
          Revisionist powers, such as China and Russia, that use technology, propaganda, and coercion to shape a world antithetical to our interests and values;) In as -revisionist ...
          https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/p
          resident-donald-j-trump-announces-national-securi
          ty-strategy-advance-americas-interests /
      2. Kent0001
        Kent0001 23 December 2017 19: 43
        0
        Moreover, it is necessary to trim the 5th column.
    3. seos
      seos 21 December 2017 14: 20
      +3
      Quote: Chertt
      The West dreams of the collapse of Russia, we are about the second civil war in the United States, Ordinary Wishlist

      They make every effort for our collapse, and we are afraid to even utter a response in response - so who will win?
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 21 December 2017 06: 26
    11
    Having destroyed Russia, our partners want to gobble up a lot of nishtyaks: the elimination of a global competitor, and a mountain of wealth in the bowels! About the population is not talking!
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 21 December 2017 11: 12
      +5
      So they wrote about it a long time ago, and more than once. That economically living in Russia is unprofitable - the climate is inappropriate. That they only need territories where mineral wealth is mined, so to speak. That in these territories personnel should be located only for servicing pipe equipment, quarries and so on. This, they calculated, is about 15 million. The rest are likely to be simply thrown on free bread.
      Naturally, those remaining who survive will begin to go astray in gangs, and then, in full accordance with the democratic principles of the West and the struggle for the well-being of civilization, they will begin to destroy them - without pity, believe me, but rather, with a joyful silver democratic laugh.
      In fact, it was precisely for this that Hitler came from all over Europe. Only times were simpler - tank wedges, carpet bombing, millions of soldiers.
      Now it’s clear, the methods are different.
  3. shinobi
    shinobi 21 December 2017 06: 30
    12
    The previous Queen of England once spoke out to her next prime minister: There is a historical paradox when we (the West) defeat Russia, for some reason it always increases its territory and influence.
  4. 1536
    1536 21 December 2017 06: 34
    +8
    There is only one thing to be afraid of: betrayal of the "Gorbachevism" type. You can forget about the rest of the nonsense and not repeat it. Another thing is that betrayal is many-sided and, alas, indestructible. Example? One “story” with the defeat of our Olympic movement is worth and explains a lot. Most importantly, ways to minimize this defeat, organize a counterattack and aim the people at victory are not even supposed. There will be no Uranus-2 operation. "All is well, beautiful marquise. And we are doing well."
    So, in principle, the algorithm is ready, the only question is whether all these Germans, Chinese and other Swedes can apply it against the whole country?
  5. cedar
    cedar 21 December 2017 06: 35
    +4
    "The West is dreaming it’s not just about "pacification", but about the dismemberment of Russia "

    If he only dreamed, but he does everything possible and impossible to destroy Russia, even in the face of the threat of a nuclear Apocalypse.
    One hundred years ago, his troops were already trampling our land. American in the Far East, French in the south, English in the north, German in the west ... Then they did not grow together .., did not dismember and did not gobble up. Now they strongly hope that we, the people of Russia, will repeat the bitter experience of the "collapse of the Soviet Union, that is," collapse "the Russian Federation. We will work for the devil.
    To do this, they worked for 26 years on our brains and souls. Now they are reasonably hoping for a long-awaited, one-hundred-year-old hatching result, the dismemberment of our Fatherland.
    Anyone who considers the elections of March 18.03.2018, XNUMX to be the next presidential election is cruelly mistaken ...
    See the root, dear ...
  6. Per se.
    Per se. 21 December 2017 07: 00
    15
    These gentlemen have always had a hard time with history, and therefore they somehow “did not take into account” the fact that the USSR rose from the Russian Empire.
    Here, just not from the "Russian Empire", but from an already collapsed empire. If you do not set a goal to become a world leader, this goal is set by others, and systematically achieve it by destroying competitors. Historically, the Netherlands and England were among the first to begin using the capitalist model in development, and it was Britain that took the lead. Napoleonic France was defeated from the main competitors thanks to the union put together by Britain, and Prussia, Austria and Russia did all the dirty work for the Anglo-Saxons. Who is most profited from this, of course, the Anglo-Saxons. What she received in the "thanks" of Russia is the Crimean War from "thankful" England. The second major contender for the world throne of capitalism was the young and ambitious German capitalism, Kaiser Germany, the Second Reich. What the Anglo-Saxons did, naturally, made a new coalition to defend their positions — the Entente, where Russia was again drawn in, literally on the eve of having a hostile policy into the Russian-Japanese war. Again, Russia is harnessing itself to save Britain, laying down its soldiers as someone’s cannon fodder for challenging world leadership. World War I summed up the main results, the main major competitors were destroyed, the German, Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian and Russian empires did not become. The arrival of the Bolsheviks, the industrialization in backward Russia, and, most importantly, the creation of a new pole of power, independent of world capitalism, the socialist system, made it possible to build a powerful Soviet Union, a new leader and a new social system appeared in the world. So, how to fight with someone else’s hands for the Anglo-Saxons has always been more convenient, we had to urgently create an anti-USSR, Nazi Germany from defeated Germany, closing our eyes to all violations of Versailles. Hitler fulfilled his task, having previously collected all possible forces from Europe, attacked the USSR, but did not win, and the Soviet Union not only survived, but soon became a nuclear and space superpower, expanded its influence in the world, creating a bloc of socialist countries. Why did the Union fall, why did the burzhuins triumph, despite the fact that capitalism had already lost its positive development, spawned transnational monopolies and turned into an absolute evil, a planetary virus? The Anglo-Saxons have talent not only to fight with someone else’s hands, these “reptilians” and geniuses in lobbying their interests, the masters of “cloak and dagger”, a cunning wallet with “thirty silversmiths” when they find their fools and Judas, when exposing swords squad. " What's next? Fortunately for Russia, the time of the Yeltsins, Chubais and Gaidars did not begin with the 1917 year, after the pro-Western February revolution, but with the Soviet safety margin, with the Soviet legacy of the nuclear shield of the space superpower. Unfortunately for Russia, capitalism was picked up from the dustbin, and we climbed into a strange pole of power, under the already established leader and the rules created by him. Unfortunately for Russia, replacing the Third Reich as the eastern anti-USSR, anti-Russia, the West helped the Chinese nationalists, closing their eyes to their "communism", terry piracy and theft in goods and technologies. Everything, as with restrictions on Versailles from Germany. As with the "brothers" by the German national socialists, we are trying to be friends against the West, already with the Chinese "national communists", which do not hide their territorial claims and claims to world hegemony. But, sanctions and isolation are not against the "red" China, but against Russia, with its bad guys and its capitalism. What does all this say ... Russia remains the main obstacle for total power on the planet of ghouls such as the Rothschilds, but as long as we are in capitalism, until we regain our independent power pole, it is unlikely that fraternal oligarchs have a big chance to squeeze out their share, or build "a multipolar world". We are alive at the expense of the Soviet safety margin, and it ends. Much depends on Comrade Putin, or Mr.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 21 December 2017 07: 15
      +8
      Quote: Per se.
      Russia must regain socialism.

      And this is the most important thing for survival!
    2. AKC
      AKC 21 December 2017 10: 27
      +3
      Russia must regain socialism.
      who should and why? so that Uzbeks, Balts, Georgians, Ukrainians and other breadwinners downloaded resources from the Russian Federation and laughed in the face of a Russian peasant saying that he was an alcoholic and could not work?
      Fortunately, Russia got rid of socialist rabies and became a normal country. without delusions such as the working class of all countries are brothers and everyone needs help!
      And who will return? Are you sitting on the couch and poking fingers into the keyboard? or me? I’m saying right away that I’m not subscribing to this business. Because a lot of blood will need to be shed! it will be necessary to kill people who do not want to live in socialism! it will be necessary to kill entrepreneurs, artists. writers, hard workers, farmers and other dissent! And if many people do not want socialism, what will you do with those who disagree?
      1. passing
        passing 21 December 2017 11: 04
        +6
        Quote: AKC
        Russia must regain socialism.
        who should and why? so that Uzbeks, Balts, Georgians, Ukrainians and other breadwinners downloaded resources from the Russian Federation and laughed in the face of a Russian peasant saying that he was an alcoholic and could not work?
        Fortunately, Russia got rid of socialist rabies and became a normal country. without delusions such as the working class of all countries are brothers and everyone needs help!
        And who will return? Are you sitting on the couch and poking fingers into the keyboard? or me? I’m saying right away that I’m not subscribing to this business. Because a lot of blood will need to be shed! it will be necessary to kill people who do not want to live in socialism! it will be necessary to kill entrepreneurs, artists. writers, hard workers, farmers and other dissent! And if many people do not want socialism, what will you do with those who disagree?


        Oh oh oh. How much pathos! And here I am pleased to participate in the restoration of socialism.
        Said the same
        Russia must regain socialism.
        , and not in other countries, you confuse socialism and communism.
        Russia, fortunately, got rid of socialist rabies,

        Those. Are you not comfortable with free education and free medicine?
        No unemployment, free housing, and cheap utilities.
        Because a lot of blood will need to be shed! it will be necessary to kill people who do not want to live in socialism! it will be necessary to kill entrepreneurs, artists. writers, hard workers, farmers and other dissent!

        Are you a sadist, or just poorly educated? OH, Mr. Chubais, is that you ????
        1. AKC
          AKC 21 December 2017 12: 32
          +2
          I thought you were for the idea. and you are a freebie lover. so that everything is free !!! offer you a thousand bucks every month. You will forget about communism-socialism, and you will stand up for capitalism !!! drew attention to the fact that lovers of freebies are mostly homesick for the USSR. as proof of the need for the USSR cite the receipt of benefits for free! reminds our Ukrainian comrades who pour mud on the Russian Federation. and when they offer them money to earn in the Russian Federation. then they forget their pride and beliefs!
          Remember that nothing happens anywhere! wrinkle your forehead: now the bricklayer who puts the brick is paid by the resident customers who earn money. the state paid in the USSR! where did the USSR take money to pay the mason? You will answer from the budget, the question is, how did they appear in the budget?
          And not all housing received. so do not lie. for example, my grandfather didn’t receive it but he built it himself, father too !! and unemployment and education are also not so simple!
          I think that the difference between you and me is as follows: I want everyone to be rich and able to pay, you want everyone to be poor and everything to be free!
          it will not work to participate in the restoration of socialism! just because no one needs him anymore.
          1. passing
            passing 21 December 2017 13: 26
            +5
            I think that the difference between you and me is as follows: I want everyone to be rich and able to pay, you want everyone to be poor and everything to be free!

            You are lying to others, or are deceiving yourself. All can not be rich. Government employees cannot be wealthy, they can only get decent salaries. They are paid from the budget.
            drew attention to the fact that lovers of freebies are mostly homesick for the USSR. as proof of the need for the USSR cite the receipt of benefits for free

            But I noticed that those who succeeded in snatching something for capitalism
            a freebie, or rather steal and not share with the state. And if you do not replenish the budget, where do decent salaries for teachers, doctors, and pensions come from?
            So the builder of capitalism, about
            it will not work to participate in the restoration of socialism! just because no one needs him anymore.
            you are mistaken. I still hope to see a revision of predatory privatization and an increase in the state's share in strategic enterprises and institutions
    3. free
      free 23 December 2017 10: 10
      +1
      Quote: Per se.
      These gentlemen have always had a hard time with history, and therefore they somehow “did not take into account” the fact that the USSR rose from the Russian Empire.
      Here, just not from the "Russian Empire", but from an already collapsed empire. If you do not set a goal to become a world leader, this goal is set by others, and systematically achieve it by destroying competitors. Historically, the Netherlands and England were among the first to begin using the capitalist model in development, and it was Britain that took the lead. Napoleonic France was defeated from the main competitors thanks to the union put together by Britain, and Prussia, Austria and Russia did all the dirty work for the Anglo-Saxons. Who is most profited from this, of course, the Anglo-Saxons. What she received in the "thanks" of Russia is the Crimean War from "thankful" England. The second major contender for the world throne of capitalism was the young and ambitious German capitalism, Kaiser Germany, the Second Reich. What the Anglo-Saxons did, naturally, made a new coalition to defend their positions — the Entente, where Russia was again drawn in, literally on the eve of having a hostile policy into the Russian-Japanese war. Again, Russia is harnessing itself to save Britain, laying down its soldiers as someone’s cannon fodder for challenging world leadership. World War I summed up the main results, the main major competitors were destroyed, the German, Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian and Russian empires did not become. The arrival of the Bolsheviks, the industrialization in backward Russia, and, most importantly, the creation of a new pole of power, independent of world capitalism, the socialist system, made it possible to build a powerful Soviet Union, a new leader and a new social system appeared in the world. So, how to fight with someone else’s hands for the Anglo-Saxons has always been more convenient, we had to urgently create an anti-USSR, Nazi Germany from defeated Germany, closing our eyes to all violations of Versailles. Hitler fulfilled his task, having previously collected all possible forces from Europe, attacked the USSR, but did not win, and the Soviet Union not only survived, but soon became a nuclear and space superpower, expanded its influence in the world, creating a bloc of socialist countries. Why did the Union fall, why did the burzhuins triumph, despite the fact that capitalism had already lost its positive development, spawned transnational monopolies and turned into an absolute evil, a planetary virus? The Anglo-Saxons have talent not only to fight with someone else’s hands, these “reptilians” and geniuses in lobbying their interests, the masters of “cloak and dagger”, a cunning wallet with “thirty silversmiths” when they find their fools and Judas, when exposing swords squad. " What's next? Fortunately for Russia, the time of the Yeltsins, Chubais and Gaidars did not begin with the 1917 year, after the pro-Western February revolution, but with the Soviet safety margin, with the Soviet legacy of the nuclear shield of the space superpower. Unfortunately for Russia, capitalism was picked up from the dustbin, and we climbed into a strange pole of power, under the already established leader and the rules created by him. Unfortunately for Russia, replacing the Third Reich as the eastern anti-USSR, anti-Russia, the West helped the Chinese nationalists, closing their eyes to their "communism", terry piracy and theft in goods and technologies. Everything, as with restrictions on Versailles from Germany. As with the "brothers" by the German national socialists, we are trying to be friends against the West, already with the Chinese "national communists", which do not hide their territorial claims and claims to world hegemony. But, sanctions and isolation are not against the "red" China, but against Russia, with its bad guys and its capitalism. What does all this say ... Russia remains the main obstacle for total power on the planet of ghouls such as the Rothschilds, but as long as we are in capitalism, until we regain our independent power pole, it is unlikely that fraternal oligarchs have a big chance to squeeze out their share, or build "a multipolar world". We are alive at the expense of the Soviet safety margin, and it ends. Much depends on Comrade Putin, or Mr.

      There’s nothing to think about! For 17 years I didn’t want to become a master in order to become a comrade!
  7. Nix1986
    Nix1986 21 December 2017 07: 09
    0
    The author has a bit of paranoia, a tough crisis in the country with nuclear weapons no one wants.
    1. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 21 December 2017 08: 21
      +3
      Quote: Nix1986
      no one wants a harsh crisis in the country with nuclear weapons.

      it is the poet who has a desire to bring liberals to power first, and after giving up nuclear weapons with further actions
      1. Nix1986
        Nix1986 21 December 2017 08: 23
        0
        Well, right now, the government is in power, so there’s nothing to worry about laughing
        1. Mestny
          Mestny 21 December 2017 11: 17
          0
          Some will always have a reason to worry.
          Everything is relative.
          What any “opposition” offers so far doesn’t even stand in principle with what those “in power” do. Any sane adult can understand what decisions for the country in this historical period will be able to take as president, for example, Ksyusha Sobchak, or G. Kasparov. Or even Yavlinsky with Zhirinovsky and Zyuganov.
          What kind of "team" they will gain for themselves, how to "establish relations" with the West.
          Therefore, so far so.
          Maybe it’s not so simple to wave a saber?
          1. Nix1986
            Nix1986 21 December 2017 11: 40
            0
            It’s sad, yes, that power is on G, but the opposition is not a pearl, it has no specifics. Such a system, such people.
        2. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 21 December 2017 12: 08
          0
          sarcasm is not appropriate
          By the way, the rejection of nuclear weapons by the current government is not planned, but Khodorkovsky voiced this
          1. Nix1986
            Nix1986 21 December 2017 13: 34
            0
            Hodor is a smart guy, it is a pity that greed covers his eyes. It’s like political corpses like Kasyans, it’s stupid to call them an opposition, you don’t have to interfere with at least one alternative, maybe in the future it will be bright traitors, despite the fact that they call themselves opposition.
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 21 December 2017 07: 15
    +4
    The idea of ​​dismembering and seizing Russia is not new. You can’t forbid anyone to dream. But pay attention to the "5th Column", which really exists in Russia for a long time, and seriously and with hard conclusions.
    1. free
      free 23 December 2017 10: 15
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The idea of ​​dismembering and seizing Russia is not new. You can’t forbid anyone to dream. But pay attention to the "5th Column", which really exists in Russia for a long time, and seriously and with hard conclusions.

      So the 5th column, consider that almost all power, with rare exceptions. Do you really turn to yourself? No, here you need the will and actions of the whole people, and what can you expect from these thieves and skins of corrupt 17 years have clearly shown.
  9. Vard
    Vard 21 December 2017 07: 15
    +1
    The dog barks .. The caravan is coming ...
  10. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 21 December 2017 08: 02
    +1
    Dreaming _ is not harmful! Or else “Dreams, dreams, what is your sweetness!” The weapons are cleaned, the pitchforks and the ax are in place, let them come, but I doubt very much that these “new liberators” will come and who will bury them!
  11. parusnik
    parusnik 21 December 2017 08: 20
    +1
    Lord, where to bury all these "dreamers"? ...
  12. sxfRipper
    sxfRipper 21 December 2017 09: 03
    +1
    former Soviet intelligence officer, historian and writer Viktor Suvorov, "but in fact - a pervert, traitor, liar and falsifier of the history of Bogdash Rezun
    Finally, he is Vladimir Bogdanovich. This is a word. And the author urgently needs a sedative.
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 21 December 2017 11: 25
      0
      There is no need to understand the varieties of g.
      The main thing here
      pervert, traitor, liar and falsifier of history
      , and it is true. And what’s his real name ...
  13. gafarovsafar
    gafarovsafar 21 December 2017 10: 10
    0
    on the map of the Finns the pistols were bought by the Kazakhs, too, do not lag behind well, about the narrow-eyed and s nothing to say
  14. AKC
    AKC 21 December 2017 10: 14
    +1
    . I do not see anything new in the article, it is as old as the world. The West dreams of the collapse of Russia. Russians dream of the collapse of the West! and as the United States falls apart, they talk about it once a week. as they divide Ukraine is constantly exaggerated in the media, in private conversations, and in VO as well.
    And I want to say that Russia is also not an angel in the flesh! That the Republic of Ingushetia, which had a hand, for example, in the partition of Poland, and in the USSR to ruin the west was also a priority, only this was presented under the guise of a struggle for the rights of the proletarians. even such a slogan was "unite the proletarians of all countries!" And what should the proletarians of all Starn do not do?
    By the way, the Communists created very serious prerequisites for the collapse of the modern Russian Federation. It was the Communists who began to create national republics and stick out the national question.
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 21 December 2017 11: 29
      0
      Here the dog rummaged.
      Ashes on the head to pour from there there are those who wish, you can be sure. So for us it’s not enough - let's put it on our own head, “for the truth.”
      The main thing is to preserve, support and justify all of its actions, and not to sing along with the enemies. Whatever it is, the country may be.
  15. Overlock
    Overlock 21 December 2017 11: 34
    0
    Quote: maxim947
    Only they don’t need to help “them” themselves, they don’t need to build power centers, they don’t need to divide society and thereby create tension, you don’t have to turn a blind eye to the impunity of “some” etc. etc.

    for this you just need to love the people of the Russian Federation, not the oligarchs and friends.
  16. apro
    apro 21 December 2017 11: 50
    +1
    Dreams of the old maiden, today Russia is an absolutely dependent country, Russians depend on energy prices, the rate of thaler, on what they say from Fashington, what they think in Europe, how supportive the PRC leadership is.
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 21 December 2017 12: 01
      +1
      Quote: apro
      Russians depend on energy prices, on the course of thaler, on what they say from Fashington, what they think in Europe, how supportive the Chinese leadership is.

      Rather, from where they store their soldiers
  17. groks
    groks 21 December 2017 12: 09
    +2
    Does not dream. The West does not dream. It will be difficult to pump oil and gas through dozens of wild principalities. There will be nobody to blame for their problems. Arming is also not against anyone. Yes, and a lot have already been purchased in our country. You can just buy the rest and not fuss.
    And here is our elite, something bad is definitely dreaming. It may turn out that they will tear the country to pieces, and shove the west back.
    1. Anyone
      Anyone 24 December 2017 21: 59
      0
      It's right. Why should the West contain non-core assets? As I see the picture now, let’s say France fights Italy for the Chelyabinsk region ... It was announced that the West needed ~ 50 million Russians who would pump gas / oil, dig ore, chopped wood and served pipelines. Well, maybe what kind of Kemsky volost or Kuril Islands the Swedes and the Japanese will open, but the fragmentation of Russia is not in the interests of US / Europe / China capital. The author of the article will soon be torn to pieces from fermentation of the pathos kvass patriotic wort)) You just get a grasp of his high style, gee:
      There is nowhere to retreat - it is worth the country to succumb, to stagger under the blows that the West is trying to shower on it from all sides today, and ...
  18. Conductor
    Conductor 21 December 2017 13: 10
    +1
    Not weakly, they cut the Kazakhs on the map!
  19. VladGashek
    VladGashek 21 December 2017 14: 30
    +1
    The danger of the collapse of Russia existed in the past and will continue. The means of prevention were and will be; strong state power, solidarity of the people and a strong army. Now the weak link is the state of our people. He is torn. The top is dreaming of Europe, but the sources of income are kept in Russia, but they are tearing everything in order to be westernized. Nationalists dream of "independence" in the Caucasus, and in the Volga region, and in Siberia, and even in the Kaliningrad region. Ordinary people are increasingly depoliticized on the principle of "but no matter", if only Czech beer, Bavarian sausages, a house in "one-story America." We must end the games of "pluralism" and "universal people" in government, education and culture.
  20. Leonid Dymov
    Leonid Dymov 22 December 2017 22: 53
    0
    The Continental Empire (Russia, China) cannot be destroyed, because its separate parts will turn into enclaves or territories that do not have access to the sea. The enclave of Tatarstan will be instantly strangled by Russia economically, and the Siberian Republic will have ports in the Arctic Ocean. The republics of the North Caucasus will turn into medieval khanates, fighting each other, which is already happening in Central Asia. The Russian Federation can exist only as a single state, its individual parts can eke out only a miserable existence.
    It is easier for European states to maintain sovereignty, because most of them have access to the sea. The EU is a misunderstanding.
    1. iouris
      iouris 23 December 2017 16: 00
      0
      Quote: Leonid Dymov
      it is impossible to break up, because its separate parts will turn into enclaves or in territories that do not have access to the sea.

      The term "collapse" in relation to the country is used incorrectly. The USSR as a country exists, and the state is destroyed, i.e. USSR resources conquered or stolen.
  21. dmprt
    dmprt 23 December 2017 18: 56
    0
    And they brutally miscalculated in this.
    No, they didn’t miscalculate. They just solve problems as they arise. The problem was the USSR - they solved this problem. Russia gradually self-destructed over the course of 20 years - there was no problem. And now they are again gradually starting to pull up resources to solve a new problem, which they call "revisionist Russia."
  22. Sofa warrior
    Sofa warrior 24 December 2017 12: 18
    0
    They don’t dream of anything, gentlemen of paranoia. They already live many times better.
  23. Nemesis
    Nemesis 25 December 2017 00: 25
    0
    I have the impression that this map was drawn by a man who escaped from orderlies in a yellow house ...
  24. Dancing gryzli
    Dancing gryzli 26 December 2017 16: 31
    0
    Yes, there are many questions to the map: why did the Americans take a small piece for themselves, and most of Siberia went to China, strengthening it immensely? How will little Finland hold on to everything that it has grabbed? etc.
  25. Belarus is Russia
    Belarus is Russia 26 December 2017 21: 05
    0
    Good article. Everything is good to chew and explain.
    Russian cookie to them, and not the collapse of Russia Russian Orthodox. On the contrary, Russia is Russian Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, will only get stronger and increase and increase in a peaceful way.
  26. Loos
    Loos 25 March 2018 10: 13
    0
    I want to be part of Finland, and not in this stupid Kazakhstan. Udmurtia was part of Finland. I hate Kazakhstan!