Military Review

The United States warned about the new tactics of the Russian army

72
American media report on new methods that Russia will use in the event of war. US analysts are confident that the Russian army will not try to "crush" the enemy with a numerical advantage. The bet will be on thin calculation and technology. And similar tactics and strategy are closer to the western manner of conducting military operations.


The National Interest publication publishes the conclusions made by experts of the American strategic research center RAND. Experts believe that, despite the Soviet past, the Russian army has changed significantly and is now developing in accordance with new realities. At the same time, a clear message is given that Russia does not intend to provoke full-scale hostilities.

The United States warned about the new tactics of the Russian army


The Russian armed forces are mainly focused on protecting their homeland, especially key settlements and industrial facilities. There is no indication that Russia is in search of a large-scale conflict.
- RAND says.

Also in the publication outlines the main characteristics of the new Russian "military way". In particular, the Russian armed forces intend to use multi-level integrated air defense systems to protect vital facilities. Can also be hit weapons "extended range".

Russia will still strive at the border to neutralize any threats that may be aimed at the center of the country: aircraft carriers, ships capable of attacking ground targets, foreign bases and some types of aircraft. To do this, it has many land-based, sea-based and air-launched missiles.
- says the study. In addition, according to experts, Russian strategists believe that the main in modern warfare will be the aerospace industry. Also, analysts emphasize the possibility of the Russian side using asymmetric responses.

At the same time, RAND believes that tactical and strategic nuclear weapons are a serious "insurance" for Russia in a critical situation.

Russia is likely to consider the question of a nuclear response to non-nuclear attacks, which pose a serious threat to its territorial integrity and sovereignty.
- says the study.

The National Interest writes that recent reforms have significantly increased the readiness of the Russian army. Also, American analysts conclude that Russia may be mixing conventional and non-traditional methods of warfare.

In their opinion, at the operational and tactical levels, the Russian army is likely to focus on the destruction of command and the destruction of the infrastructure to control the enemy troops. In this case, the use of cyber-electronic warfare is possible. And against the key operational and strategic objectives high-precision long-range weapons can be used. Also, the Russian army will actively use highly mobile equipment with significant firepower and shelling, reports "RG-Force"
Photos used:
Vladimir Sergeev / RIA News
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Cornelius
    Cornelius 20 December 2017 15: 02 New
    +3
    In their opinion, at the operational and tactical levels, the Russian army will most likely concentrate on destroying the command and destroying the enemy command and control infrastructure.
    So I think we must first act, not just the United States.
    1. 79807420129
      79807420129 20 December 2017 15: 05 New
      22
      US analysts are sure that the Russian army will not try to "crush" the enemy by a numerical advantage

      US analysts still probably believe that we have bears walking around the streets with balalaikas and vodka. laughing
      1. Cornelius
        Cornelius 20 December 2017 15: 10 New
        0
        Do not exaggerate, Vladislav, it does not paint you.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 20 December 2017 19: 55 New
          +8
          Quote: Cornelius
          Do not exaggerate, Vladislav, it does not paint you.

          ... we read the first paragraph of the article ... and we understand everything at once ...
          US media report on new methods that Russia will use in the event of war. US Analysts Sure the Russian army will not try to "crush" the enemy with a numerical advantage. The bet will be placed on delicate calculation and technology. And such tactics and strategies are closer to the western style of warfare.
          ... you feel like it smells ... especially the West was at war in Katyn, Auschwitz and Buchenwald ... burning Soviet women and children in barns ... in bulk, this is high-tech, the whole village at once ... Babi Yar in Kiev ... it’s just an example of Western technological effectiveness ... Stalingrad ... ah, Dresden, and Koenigsberg ... it’s like the Westerners to the Westerners ... It is touched by this LOAD! ... it’s not in vain that the two states only today voted against the resolution on “Heroizing Fascism” ... the United States and ... applause - Ukraine ... the EU - abstained ... so who does it paint? ... Izba Krasna is not Shutters, but Pies ... learn Russian - definitely fit in ... during interrogation ... soldier
      2. inkass_98
        inkass_98 20 December 2017 15: 59 New
        +4
        No not like that wink , like this:
        1. Geisenberg
          Geisenberg 20 December 2017 16: 44 New
          +2
          Quote: inkass_98
          No not like that wink , like this:


          It is you who live this way of your own free will. And the rest do without cells.
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 20 December 2017 15: 16 New
      +5
      Recently, The National Interest, began to publish interesting materials about Russia, in which there are no longer any old patterns, about "clay feet." Editorial reshuffle probably occurred
      1. Crowe
        Crowe 20 December 2017 15: 24 New
        +5
        Custom articles! Praise your enemies and take the best from them - good marketers work!
        1. Chertt
          Chertt 20 December 2017 15: 31 New
          +7
          Anglo-Saxons are enemies, it’s without question, But it’s not necessary, it means that any analytical material about Russia is necessarily paid for by “hostile forces”. For example, in VO, there were articles with positive reviews about the US Army and weapons
        2. Serg koma
          Serg koma 20 December 2017 17: 35 New
          +2
          Quote: Crowe
          Praise your enemies and take the best from them - good marketers work!

          Praise the enemies and "inflate" the military budget !!!
      2. Bigriver
        Bigriver 20 December 2017 15: 47 New
        +4
        Quote: Chertt
        Recently, The National Interest, began to publish interesting materials about Russia, in which there are no longer any old patterns, about "clay feet." Editorial reshuffle probably occurred

        Conservatives and .., a rare case. This is one of the major publications supporting Trump.
        NI has been headed by Dmitry Simes for over 20 years, who regularly appears as an expert on Ross. TV
        But, all this, in our case, is not important. NI refers to the analysis of the American strategic research center RAND.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 20 December 2017 16: 20 New
          +4
          Quote: BigRiver
          But, all this, in our case, is not important. NI refers to the analysis of the American strategic research center RAND.

          That is, the analytics of the company, half working for US government, the brainchild of General Arnold, General LeMay and Douglas, who is Douglas smile .
          1. Bigriver
            Bigriver 20 December 2017 16: 46 New
            0
            Quote: Alexey RA
            .... That is, on the analytics of a company half working for US government, ..

            The first ten or twenty "think tanks" of the USA, in practice, are constantly working on the order of government agencies. request
      3. Orionvit
        Orionvit 20 December 2017 17: 04 New
        +1
        Quote: Chertt
        The National Interest, began to publish interesting materials about Russia, in which there are no longer old patterns, about "clay feet"

        Not only that, when I read that Russia was not going to attack anyone, but only to defend itself, I could not believe my eyes. But what about “aggressive” Russia, which threatens the entire (not only democratic) world? Something there died in the forest, Western analysts are not like themselves.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 20 December 2017 15: 57 New
      +4
      It’s worth it to wang. Let them try to poke around. We’ll feed the whole of NATO with baits. bully
      1. Ragnar Lodbrok
        Ragnar Lodbrok 20 December 2017 16: 55 New
        +4
        Enough to throw hats already, have they fed a lot in Yugoslavia? They bomb our allies in Syria, and silence in return!
        1. Pancir026
          Pancir026 20 December 2017 22: 40 New
          +3
          Quote: Ragnar lodbrok
          Enough to throw hats already, have they fed a lot in Yugoslavia?

          In Yugoslavia there is no fault of our Army, there is the fault of the ever drunk leader of thieves and speculators, who from 90 in the country performed the Sabbath.
          However, at one famous airport, the Russian landing showed Kuzkin his mother the Anglo-Saxons. Despite the demands of Clark, the English general did not want to fight against the Russian army, this is a fact.
          And then, do not compare Yeltsin’s Russia with mediocre clowns in all structures, with Russia today.
        2. Lycan
          Lycan 21 December 2017 11: 53 New
          0
          Quote: Ragnar lodbrok
          in Yugoslavia fed a lot?

          It is believed that during the time of "Yugoslavia" - the USSR was far from Yugoslavia.
          The USSR was spreading "at the seams".
      2. Greenwood
        Greenwood 20 December 2017 17: 21 New
        +2
        A photo with Givi, given that he is dead, is inappropriate.
      3. Uryukc
        Uryukc 20 December 2017 17: 35 New
        +2
        Sorry Givi ...
    4. Doliva63
      Doliva63 20 December 2017 21: 39 New
      +4
      This is almost unrealistic. I'm talking about "focus on destruction." This requires intelligence. And after the mentioned reforms, it is almost gone. In the battalion unit it is no longer at all, in the regiment it is reduced to the level of reconnaissance by observation, in the division it is just as bad as it was before, the army companies were dispersed, the district / front brigades were “fixed”. What are the forces to seek and refine goals?
      No, I understand that the road builder Shoigu understands in intelligence more than any Master in Military High School "tactical intelligence", "special intelligence" (if they are now), but I have the right not to believe this.
      1. komandir8
        komandir8 20 December 2017 23: 03 New
        0
        All motorized rifle, tank divisions and brigades in the state have separate reconnaissance battalions. In tank brigades - reconnaissance companies.
  2. Petr1968
    Petr1968 20 December 2017 15: 12 New
    +3
    The Russian armed forces are mainly focused on protecting their homeland, especially key settlements and industrial facilities. There is no indication that Russia is in search of a large-scale conflict.

    Why only large-scale? Or is it a subtle hint of Ukraine? So "insistent" and private military organizations are not part of the Armed Forces, so we do not need to troll. Flies separately, cutlets separately
  3. -ш-
    -ш- 20 December 2017 15: 18 New
    +6
    why did they decide that there was no tactic in the USSR, just push everything, then even education in the union was the best in the world
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 20 December 2017 21: 52 New
      +4
      Tactically, they always lost to the Union. That's why they are angry so far laughing drinks
  4. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 20 December 2017 15: 20 New
    13
    "The emphasis will be on delicate calculation and technology. And such tactics and strategies are closer to the Western style of warfare."

    Oh my god, what advanced, "Western partners" they are. Thinly lyuley get around the world. Okay, technology, a lot of intelligence is not necessary in order to smash bearded muzzle-turners with high-precision weapons, which they have nothing to answer. But a delicate calculation? In what place is he thin?
    1. Petr1968
      Petr1968 21 December 2017 11: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: Sands Career General
      hell of technology, a lot of intelligence is not necessary to smash bearded muzzle-turners with high-precision weapons, which they have nothing to answer. But a delicate calculation? In what place is he thin?

      From under water with expensive rockets to shoot jeeps in the desert is a delicate calculation. You just don’t understand him. Of course, the goal is not a jeep ... Putin’s cunning plan in action !!!
  5. Lexus
    Lexus 20 December 2017 15: 24 New
    +3
    When the Americans will come to the main conclusion that the confrontation with Russia for them, at best, will end in empty pockets on "overfilled" pants ...
  6. NEXUS
    NEXUS 20 December 2017 15: 32 New
    +7
    The Russian armed forces are mainly focused on protecting their homeland, especially key settlements and industrial facilities. There is no sign that Russia is in search of a large-scale conflict

    Well, the fact that the Motherland is written with a capital letter is unlikely to be explained to mattresses ... but the fact that they de facto say that we are sharpening our armed forces under the defense of our Motherland, and not aggression against other countries, suggests that that the mattresses are confused in the testimony. Moreover, how can a country that thinks about the defense of its borders be the Axis of Evil and the aggressor?
    1. chidoryan
      chidoryan 20 December 2017 15: 48 New
      +3
      "Well, the fact that the Motherland is capitalized is hardly possible for the mattresses to explain."

      Explain this better to articles in)))
      1. Non liberoid Russian
        Non liberoid Russian 20 December 2017 16: 09 New
        +1
        better google translator))))
    2. rocket757
      rocket757 20 December 2017 15: 49 New
      +3
      Come on, Schaub, such trifles could confuse them, their "light elves", who care about the whole world.
      A gloomy "Mordor" even building a sturdy fence is starting something vile!
    3. Petr1968
      Petr1968 21 December 2017 11: 16 New
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      Moreover, how can a country that thinks about the defense of its borders be the Axis of Evil and the aggressor?

      You can defend your former territories and "yours" in someone else's territory .... if that I hint at the Sudetenland, and not what you thought wink
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 21 December 2017 12: 09 New
        +3
        We can think of Kaliningrad, the former ...
        And we can do more of the Iskanders and take them where we need to.
  7. Azazelo
    Azazelo 20 December 2017 15: 47 New
    0
    "The Russian armed forces are mainly focused on protecting their homeland, especially key settlements and industrial facilities. There are no signs that Russia is in search of a large-scale conflict."
    YES AS SAME THEY DARE TO WANT IT ...
  8. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 20 December 2017 15: 49 New
    +1
    The unpopular Taburetkin carried out sensible reforms.
    Going to the brigade, for example. Experience in the Donbass made
    switch to effective combined battalion groups.
    But then there was a return to Soviet gigantism: the army,
    new divisions ... In short, many headquarters (and posts) without soldiers
    and technology.
    1. Bigriver
      Bigriver 20 December 2017 16: 08 New
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      ... The experience in the Donbass made
      switch to effective combined battalion groups.

      They went ... to the hull! wink
      The first, in the DPR, is formed of tactical groups (brigades, in fact). And the LNR corps consists of brigades and by name.
      Quote: voyaka uh
      But then there was a return to Soviet gigantism: the army,
      new divisions ...

      13 divisions from Kaliningrad to the Kuril Islands - is it gigantism?
      There is no corps link.
    2. cannabis
      cannabis 20 December 2017 16: 23 New
      +2
      All states build their armed forces from armies, corps, divisions, brigades. Why mislead readers? There are simply periods when states reduce their aircraft for one reason or another. The brigade turns into a separate battalion, the division begins to be called a brigade. Over time, and depending on external threats, the troops "turn around" And the brigades become divisions. Each HF has a Historical Form, where all these "transformations" are fixed. Why mislead people? Not good, dishonest. And you might think that everyone is fighting without headquarters, and only the Russian army has overgrown with headquarters as a scab.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 20 December 2017 16: 28 New
        0
        "All states build their armed forces from armies, corps, divisions, brigades" ////

        Not all. We have: brigade, battalion, company, platoon, squad, unit.
        As an exception: a semi-brigade (for example, two separate battalions
        by general command).
        There is no army, division, regiment.
        1. cannabis
          cannabis 20 December 2017 16: 32 New
          +4
          How much land do you have to protect? 21 thousand square kilometers! And in Rasei, only the Tyumen region is one and a half million square kilometers. So you get by with companies and battalions.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 20 December 2017 16: 50 New
            0
            It is not related to the territory. 4 brigades or one division can be formed
            from the same number of soldiers and officers.
            The question is - what is the more convenient way to manage, train, supply, move from place to place.
            For example: they formed a division, but really there are people in it — just scrape together for one brigade.
            And the generals in Moscow order: "DIVISION - go!" Well, this under-division brigade is smashed by rubbish, because it is a fictitious "paper" in essence.
            1. cannabis
              cannabis 20 December 2017 17: 03 New
              +4
              In the U.S. Army, there are 4 brigade headquarters in the division. And separate battalions of 6-8 tank, 6-8 motorized infantry, 4 artillery divisions. A division may, at its discretion, form a brigade, giving it a certain number of battalions. In our army, in peacetime, battalions were distributed among the regiments. What is the problem?
        2. strannik1985
          strannik1985 20 December 2017 18: 14 New
          0
          In the sense? And the 36th Panzer Division "Gaash" or the 162th Panzer Division "Ha Plada"? Isn't SV AOI divided into regular, territorial and reserve divisions?
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 20 December 2017 19: 00 New
            0
            What you called are artillery and tank brigades, not divisions.
            This is understandable by the number of battalions: 4-5 battalions per brigade.
            "Khativa" is a Hebrew brigade. Gdud - the battalion. In the full infantry battalion of about 400-450 people.
            .
            1. strannik1985
              strannik1985 21 December 2017 00: 00 New
              +1
              Wait, is 1 infantry (Golani), 7 tank (Saar Mi-Golan), 188 tank (Barak), 282 artillery (Golan), 263 reserve tank (Merkavot Hash) is not a brigade?
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 21 December 2017 09: 28 New
                0
                All are brigades. A maximum of 2-2.5 thousand people.
                Only the paratroopers (“Hathatat Tsanhanim”) have more, since
                both reservists and regulars are considered together.
                1. strannik1985
                  strannik1985 21 December 2017 15: 20 New
                  0
                  Russian open sources claim that they are part of the 36th Panzer Division.
        3. komandir8
          komandir8 20 December 2017 23: 11 New
          0
          No, for example, 1 Guards. tank army, 20 guards. the combined arms army of the Western Military District — consists of divisions, regiments, and separate brigades.
    3. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 20 December 2017 17: 17 New
      +4
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The unpopular Taburetkin carried out sensible reforms.
      Going to the brigade, for example. Experience in the Donbass made
      switch to effective combined battalion groups.
      But then there was a return to Soviet gigantism: the army,
      new divisions ... In short, many headquarters (and posts) without soldiers
      and technology.

      It's not about gigantism. The point is the country's capabilities and the tasks assigned to the Armed Forces.
      In 2008, when the reform began, the task was to create from the remnants of Soviet luxury highly mobile forces of constant readiness, ready at any time to force someone not very big and toothy to the world. Because as of 08.08.08 it suddenly turned out that even classified as combat-ready units in fact cannot be deployed in an acceptable time frame or equipped with the equipment of the times of the Marked or even Brenenos. And most of the aircraft are “paper” divisions, air regiments with a flying squadron, and brigades of ships smaller than the division. The military-industrial complex was also in line with the army, on the one hand it was not spoiled by domestic orders, and on the other, it believed that the army would take any of its share, because there are still no options. How do you like a tactical UAV with a radius of 40 km with a lowercase TV camera, which required 4 KAMAZs for 6 UAVs? belay And this miracle was pushed into the army in 2008.
      In addition, then it was believed that the West is relatively sane, and there will be no ordinary average war. The maximum is another 08.08.08. So she began to sculpt brigades of constant readiness from divisions, filling them with equipment.
      In the time of Kuzhugetich, on the one hand, the economy and capabilities of the military-industrial complex grew, and on the other, it became clear that the situation was heating up and the hope of only low-intensity conflicts turned out to be only hope. So I had to reintroduce the division.
      1. strannik1985
        strannik1985 20 December 2017 18: 21 New
        0
        What is the link in this case? This explained the general reduction in the army, de-cropped units and formations.
        The division was abandoned for another reason, the reduction of command and control levels will improve the controllability of troops (ChSK Shamans were not allowed to change the airborne squadrons of the Airborne Forces, the highly mobile troops remained in the form of VDDs and separate brigades).
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 20 December 2017 19: 04 New
          0
          "Link" is my incorrect, as it turned out, translation of the term
          "hulia." This is in the infantry 3 (in my time) or 4 (now, if I'm not mistaken)
          person in the department. The lowest level of division.
          1. strannik1985
            strannik1985 21 December 2017 00: 03 New
            0
            No, in this case the link is the control link. There was a regiment-division-army-VO (front), became a brigade-operational command (there was an army), operational-strategic command (there was a military district).
    4. Doliva63
      Doliva63 20 December 2017 22: 07 New
      +5
      In the states there are no divisions, or what ?! laughing
      Can you steer the GS battalions? And they still complete, train, supply - also GS? On an Israeli scale, it’s probably possible. The regiment will form battalion groups easily and naturally. But who will command the regiments? Suppose, instead of regiments and divisions, brigades. This does not remove the army link anyway, but - the regiment is not as heavy as the brigade.
      Everything was right in the USSR. Maybe someday the collapse will be canceled. drinks
      Normal Jews secretly believe in this and live here. Who has lost faith, leaves for Israel laughing drinks
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 21 December 2017 22: 28 New
        +2
        Quote: Doliva63
        Normal Jews secretly believe in this and live here. Who has lost faith, leaves for Israel

        Sometimes they come back ... yes And again they begin to believe, but they don’t tell anyone about it. laughing
  9. inkass_98
    inkass_98 20 December 2017 15: 58 New
    +1
    Analysts, damn it ... "Most likely", "maybe", "probably" - that’s their whole forecast. We have such analysts for three expeditionary corps.
    1. Petr1968
      Petr1968 21 December 2017 11: 22 New
      0
      Quote: inkass_98
      Analysts, damn it ... "Most likely", "maybe", "probably" - that’s their whole forecast. We have such analysts for three expeditionary corps.

      Yes, we have 5 people in every political show .. and on this forum every second one ... even the first one)
  10. Don Analyst
    Don Analyst 20 December 2017 15: 59 New
    0
    Brainstorming begins at the adversaries - for us this is not the best phenomenon.
  11. Don Analyst
    Don Analyst 20 December 2017 16: 00 New
    0
    Do not expect anything good from the Anglo-Saxon!
    1. Petr1968
      Petr1968 21 December 2017 11: 19 New
      0
      Quote: Don Analyst
      Do not expect anything good from the Anglo-Saxon!

      I’ll say more - enemies around !!!
  12. bald
    bald 20 December 2017 16: 02 New
    0
    --- "And such tactics and strategies are closer to the western style of warfare." - We looked well at the western coalition in Syria, we didn’t even stand nearby. --- "Also, American analysts conclude that Russia may mix conventional and non-traditional methods of warfare." --- And at the expense of unconventional methods of war - laughing - this is not the address, this is to your colleagues.
  13. Alexex
    Alexex 20 December 2017 16: 03 New
    +2
    A country with a gas station with a torn economy ... appoints the president of the United States and prepares to occupy Europe with an army of defense doctrine .... Zadornov is dead, and American "wisdom" lives and thrives, complementing the picture described by Zadornov
  14. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 20 December 2017 16: 07 New
    +1
    Summary: - In the event of an attack, Russia will defend itself with all available means.
  15. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 20 December 2017 16: 09 New
    0
    Let the lips not roll out who you need at the border by pincing, and we will get the initiators and owners beyond the puddle, for complete discomfort.
    1. Petr1968
      Petr1968 21 December 2017 11: 21 New
      0
      Quote: Hariton Laptev
      Let the lips not roll out who you need at the border by pincing, and we will get the initiators and owners beyond the puddle, for complete discomfort.

      If you’ve already begun to speak in the words of the government (we’ll do it, everything will be in the future ... everything should be the main thing), then you should add “it shouldn’t be like that” and after 2025 it will be ... And that's it, I’m ready to vote for your program, go to the presidency .
  16. GELEZNII_KAPUT
    GELEZNII_KAPUT 20 December 2017 16: 18 New
    0
    Aha, numerical advantage, 160 lyam against 1 yard, do we need this ?! Is this a joke !? wassat
  17. Homos
    Homos 20 December 2017 16: 21 New
    +4
    The bet will be placed on delicate calculation and technology.

    similar tactics and strategies closer to the western style of warfare
    read and laughed, laughed, laughed. This is written by a magazine from an exceptional country, whose army even created a 10-fold advantage in manpower and equipment, having total control of airspace for a year hammered into Raqqu dust. But the city was taken only after backstage arrangements for the bearded.
    1. Romulus
      Romulus 21 December 2017 11: 28 New
      0
      Quote: homos
      read and laughed, laughed, laughed.

      US analysts are confident that the Russian army will not try to "crush" the enemy with a numerical advantage. Bet will be made on thin calculation and technology. And such tactics and strategies are closer to the western style of warfare.
      Edition The National Interest publishes
      Similarly, a colleague .. laughing
      1. IQ12NHJ21az
        IQ12NHJ21az 21 December 2017 21: 55 New
        0
        And where and when did we “crush” the enemy with a numerical advantage?
  18. dvina71
    dvina71 20 December 2017 16: 48 New
    +3
    I’m just wondering .. I would have at least one historical fact .. where any Western army defeated an equal enemy with high technology with small losses ..
  19. Maz
    Maz 20 December 2017 18: 27 New
    +6
    Quote: voyaka uh
    The unpopular Taburetkin carried out sensible reforms.
    Going to the brigade, for example. Experience in the Donbass made
    switch to effective combined battalion groups.
    But then there was a return to Soviet gigantism: the army,
    new divisions ... In short, many headquarters (and posts) without soldiers
    and technology.
    uti, uti, uti how long have you served in our Russian army? Do you know the situation from the inside or have you read the newspapers? I’m inside, and my colleagues are still classmates.

    The divisions deployed are those that the Americans forced Yeltsin to roll. Moreover, different branches and types of troops. Some generally cannot fight a battalion group — for example, air defense, artillery, and aviation.

    Unfolded during the Yeltsin dshbr. Only the special groups of the General Directorate of the General Staff are more effective than them.
    Donbass experience? This is when all your mercenaries from the Satseret Matkal at the airport of Donetsk put all? Is it experience from there? And they came there with all your technical superiority. And none of these insolents left alive.

    So, tell us better about Israel’s successes in reaching an agreement with the Palestinians. You know better there so far. And about our army - this is for you in the US rumo. They are afraid of us touching the fire one by one, they attract all the mongrels from the side, the Schaub flock to poison. But only in the back, only from under the silence and meanly. Even the directives were invented. All your tactics - to bring down It is desirable ten together, on tanks. one with a bow or slingshot, with satellites and a laser and a plane with a drone. That’s all the tactics of the USA and its allies. But Israel, after all, is an ally, and even a strategic one, is it true the Fighter? Do you want to talk about it?
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 20 December 2017 22: 26 New
      +5
      That Yeltsin changed everything to his power, I agree. Rare s.voloch.
      But - where is the DSBR? Maybe he just missed something, but the DSD is completely different. And who are the "special groups of the main department"? They replaced the GRU brigades? This is not real, in my opinion.
  20. komandor921
    komandor921 21 December 2017 07: 15 New
    0
    In their opinion, and as I understand it, the West can’t have a different opinion, because it stupidly lacks the mind for anything, apart from what they had already come up with, and calling it the greatest invention of military affairs, they pull everything to their ears They have one strategy. To bomb everything in the district, first of all, the places where civilians are crowded, and then let their soldiers clean up. And you can not let anyone in. But bomb and destroy everything that caught my eye. This they call "NATO standards."