The demand for inflatable tanks and missiles has doubled

51
The supply of imitation and camouflage equipment in the 2017 year has doubled compared to last year. About it Interfax said the representative of the company "Rusbal" Alex Komarov.

According to him, Russian inflatable Tanks and missiles "are in great demand in the world" and compete with products from the UK, China and Germany.



The demand for inflatable tanks and missiles has doubled


Up to 30 percent of Russian-made products delivered to foreign customers
- said Komarov.



He clarified that we are talking about simulators of missiles, anti-aircraft missile systems, aviation several types of equipment, recently armored vehicles have been added to these samples.



Moreover, if previously there were deliveries of two-dimensional models of armored vehicles, now only pneumatic models are delivered.
- noted the agency interlocutor.

Pneumatic model - military equipment simulator is a frame covered with an airtight shell, it copies samples of military equipment with a high degree of detail. The customer provides the developer with the telltale signs of military equipment, which are fully taken into account when creating the layout. Each pneumatic model of military equipment contains a shell, thermal and radar simulators, a power unit and a fan. The composition of the layouts may also include elements of the rigid frame. All models are transported by road, sea and air transport without restrictions. The mass of one sample is from 30 to 100 kg.

  • http://j-times.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    20 December 2017 14: 50
    If the real ones are not enough, it’ll go
    1. +21
      20 December 2017 14: 53
      No real, not enough, without these.
      1. +5
        20 December 2017 15: 18
        And if these inflatable models also launch inflatable rockets, then in general ...
        We are working on it.
        1. +5
          20 December 2017 16: 05
          Our response to rubber women manufacturers)))
          1. 0
            20 December 2017 16: 08
            Ha! Soon, due to increased demand, inflatable tanks, etc. will be more expensive than the real ones! Yes
            The world is definitely feverishly preparing for TMV! sad
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        20 December 2017 16: 02
        It seems that it was not in vain in the USSR that rubber products were assigned number 2. lol It is necessary to protect from unwanted penetration.
    2. +6
      20 December 2017 14: 55
      According to him, Russian inflatable tanks and missiles "are in great demand in the world" and make up

      Disguise is certainly good too
      These missiles also have rubber imitators.? what
      1. +3
        20 December 2017 15: 35
        Disguise is certainly good too

        If only they did not stand as real. And then they will take an example from the manufacturers of "imitations" of the road surface, sensei of "disguising" budget money ...
      2. +3
        20 December 2017 16: 32
        Quote: 79807420129
        These missiles also have rubber imitators.?

        Of course they have. False positions, imitation of a concentration of troops, false artillery batteries and others have been practiced since time immemorial, and even about false airfields — again, “Kies-Kees” jammed, even feature films were shot.
        Quote: 79807420129
        rubber imitators.
        it’s in sex shops, and here they’re talking about means of disguising and misinforming the enemy, about things necessary in this life ...
      3. +1
        20 December 2017 17: 37
        Quote: 79807420129
        These missiles also have rubber imitators.

        This is specifically not necessary (in the photo you have the launch of the Dnepr launch vehicle)


        P-36М2 "black" in the coating


        they use simulators of launch positions of ICBMs

        And so, yes of course "have"

        1. +6
          20 December 2017 17: 43
          Quote: Fitter65
          Of course they have. False positions, imitation of a concentration of troops, false artillery batteries and others have been practiced since time immemorial, and even about false airfields

          Quote: opus
          so yes of course "have"

          Thanks Colleagues for the info hi Yours! hi
      4. 0
        20 December 2017 21: 19
        [quote = 79807420129

        These missiles also have rubber imitators.? what[/ Quote]
        At one time he worked at a factory, which, among other products, produced false ballistic missiles (LBR). Of course, they were not rubber, they did not seem to be different from ICBMs, they knew how to fly, and most importantly, to start. Satellites pinpoint starts, so let them pinpoint.
        I’m sure that Pentagon satellite images of Soviet missiles, which no, no, will be shown on TV, are our products, or of our rubber colleagues. smile
    3. +2
      20 December 2017 15: 21
      I would take one tank ... Purely swim on it on the lake near the beach))
    4. +1
      20 December 2017 16: 12
      For each real product it would be necessary for 5-10 inflatable, given the quantitative reserve of missiles to attack us. Especially on air defense and missile defense products.
  2. +1
    20 December 2017 15: 03
    in 41, there were no such imitators and they bombed real equipment - they had to crawl in any weather 1418 days before Berlin in any weather
    1. +3
      20 December 2017 15: 21
      It was. At least read books or something.
      1. +2
        20 December 2017 21: 29
        There were no rubber planes in the "Restless Farm"
        They were made of battens and fabrics. But at the same time, they also moved, and at the airport the equipment darted in a panic
    2. 0
      20 December 2017 15: 23
      They must be used as targets at the training ground)))
  3. +4
    20 December 2017 15: 05
    It’s interesting, but you can pull this model onto a real tank and let the enemy look at it, he will think that the tank is inflatable and he’s an OP and the real one laughing
    1. +4
      20 December 2017 15: 14
      Quote: Lightning
      It’s interesting, but you can pull this model onto a real tank and let the enemy look at it, he will think that the tank is inflatable and he’s an OP and the real one laughing

      In the Golan (or whatever they are in Arabic), I accurately distinguished Syrian real tanks from inflatable ones. The wind, however, does not swing these tanks and the barrel does not bend them. wink
      1. 0
        20 December 2017 15: 23
        However, stood very close?
      2. +2
        20 December 2017 15: 29
        Quote: professor
        I accurately distinguished Syrian real tanks from inflatable ones.
        A very valuable skill in civilian life. Yes And then everything happens (as in that joke about an Estonian) ... laughing
      3. 0
        20 December 2017 16: 16
        And our blowers are not for your liking, prof. For amers we try, we will ask for a date tomahawks and similar evil spirits if the Anglo-Saxons finally get rid of it.
      4. 0
        20 December 2017 17: 49
        judging by the video here in the trunk frame is hard so it should not bend
      5. 0
        20 December 2017 18: 21
        Everything depends on the strength of the wind, the real tank can pump (((
      6. +1
        20 December 2017 21: 12
        In modern warfare, the goal is distinguished by electronics, and an inflatable tank for it has the same characteristics as the real one.
        1. 0
          20 December 2017 21: 28
          Quote: KOMA
          In modern warfare, the goal is distinguished by electronics, and an inflatable tank for it has the same characteristics as the real one.

          Did she tell you that? wink I thought that the fighter was searching for the target, recognizing it, pointing at it and ... then a technical matter. The question is, why should I shoot at a dumb tank?

          Quote: vredlo
          judging by the video here in the trunk frame is hard so it should not bend

          The layout of the tank weighs 30-100 kg. With such windage and weight, even with a fresh wind it will be thrown and bent. The layout of the air defense system and radar is generally a great sail. Take it away with the wind.
          1. +1
            21 December 2017 00: 11
            Quote: professor
            I thought that the fighter was searching for the target, recognizing it, pointing at it and ... then a technical matter. The question is, why should I shoot at a dumb tank?

            It remains to get to the fast-moving tank at 500 m to discern that "the king is something fake." And then it will be difficult to recognize with eyes - they will water from the wind. And electronics "bending trunk", etc. - will not see.
            Quote: professor
            The layout of the air defense system and radar is generally a great sail. Take it away with the wind.

            Yeah. Here are just a tourist tent does not blow the wind. For instance. Why - prompt?
            1. 0
              21 December 2017 09: 43
              Quote: SergeBS
              It remains to get to the fast-moving tank at 500 m to discern that "the king is something fake." And then it will be difficult to recognize with eyes - they will water from the wind. And electronics "bending trunk", etc. - will not see.

              I did not look at the Syrian tank from 500 meters, but an order of magnitude more. By the way, just in your commercial Zeiss binoculars. ATGM striking at a distance of more than 5000 meters is a rarity.

              Quote: SergeBS
              Yeah. Here are just a tourist tent does not blow the wind. For instance. Why - prompt?

              Yeah. This is if you have time to secure the tent with ten lines, but even then it sways remarkably with the wind. You cannot disguise yourself as a big boulder.
              1. 0
                22 December 2017 20: 57
                Quote: professor
                I did not look at the Syrian tank from 500 meters, but an order of magnitude more. By the way, just in your commercial Zeiss binoculars.

                "Professor" once again demonstrated ignorance of at least optics. Well, tell me how the "bending trunks" made out with 5 km.
                Hint: only the "professors" have a homogeneous environment that does not introduce distortions (in some 20-50 cm) at a distance of 5 kM. laughing

                Quote: professor
                Yeah. This is if you have time to secure the tent with ten lines, but even then it sways remarkably with the wind. You cannot disguise yourself as a big boulder.

                Another screech for the topic "do not have time, sway" ...
                Between "swaying" and "nafig breaks" at a distance of 5-10-20 km - VERY big difference. Especially for the "professor" I’ll clarify: the reel EVEN at 0.5 meters - you will hell with 30 kM (for example).
                I HINT "hinted" to the professor, where is his place in physics knowledge?
                1. The comment was deleted.
      7. +1
        21 December 2017 02: 27
        Quote: professor
        accurately distinguished Syrian real tanks from inflatable ones. The wind, however, does not swing these tanks and the barrel does not bend them.

        These mock-ups are not for “tourists” to look at them from 5 m ..... (okay ... from 10 ...) This "swindle" is more intended for air and space reconnaissance.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +7
            22 December 2017 21: 14
            Quote: SergeBS
            with 5 km you can see the horseradish, the traveler waves your hand or only moves his legs

            Right.
            And the telescope, binoculars and others, ahem, telescopes came up with precisely "they, physicists who don’t know," right?
            Really, why?
            After all, the insidious at-mo-sphere searches for everything ... completely.
            Would you stop hysteria already ... physicist Yes
  4. 0
    20 December 2017 15: 08
    So-and-so ..... So the Russian "swindle" is going to the "abroad" ... But what ... they can’t go there anymore? Are all production facilities for the production of inflatable women involved?
    1. 0
      20 December 2017 16: 17
      And I thought about that. Only "ours" above, we are not ours for a long time. A foreign loot is always native.
  5. +2
    20 December 2017 15: 13
    What is the generation of inflatable? 5+ or 6+? Is the inflatable crew put in an inflatable tank?
  6. +5
    20 December 2017 15: 13
    Yeah, at first they laugh, and then they buy.
    You must be able to deceive the enemy, and here all means are good.
  7. +1
    20 December 2017 15: 16
    someone said that war is a way of deception)))
  8. +1
    20 December 2017 15: 22
    On such a tank in the sea would swim instead of a mattress.
  9. +1
    20 December 2017 16: 18
    PMB Pneumatic (inflatable) models of armored vehicles
    The problem is that the "rubber" technology will not be able to reproduce all the combat properties: modern detection tools, which, for example, uses NATO, easily distinguish the materials from which such vehicles will be made from metal. In addition, inflatable tanks will not be able to move independently, and in bad weather they will be blown away by a strong wind. Moreover, problems with inflatable tanks and aircraft will arise already at the transfer stage. When moving the same pneumatic tanks on airplanes, it will be necessary to simulate the transfer of an entire battalion, that is, one departure of the aircraft can not do. At the same time, transportation of aircraft mockups is not possible due to the latest radar systems that recognize fake. To move the models on the ground, you will need real cars, because the "rubber tanks" themselves will not go. If inflatable equipment is transported by train, there is a danger that it will be blown off from the railway platforms by the air flow during movement.

    1. +3
      20 December 2017 16: 32
      Even during the "Desert Storm", most of the "Tomogawks" at the price of a million more then dollars were issued here with such elastic bands.
      In 1999 during the NATO bombing of Serbia, a significant part of the Kyrgyz Republic was also driven crazy by microwave sources made of microwaves.
      Now imagine the attempts of the "remote war" beloved by the chief officers in mountainous-wooded, or wooded-marshy areas with strong EW effects, the operation of strong layered air defense and missile defense, and even using false targets, as well as special aerosols. Let's just say these attempts will be almost useless.
      1. +1
        21 December 2017 02: 16
        Quote: faterdom
        In 1999 during the NATO bombing of Serbia, a significant part of the Kyrgyz Republic was also driven crazy by microwave sources made of microwaves.

        Lord! Yes, from that time, it has already been proven “one hundred thousand” times that these are “bullies”!
    2. +2
      20 December 2017 17: 55
      with a mass of 30 kg, one truck will be enough to transfer a tank battalion and they said it simulates everything and radio reflection and heat so that the usual radar will not distinguish the pilot’s or satellite’s eyes all the more so, but something specific is not always at hand so the benefit will definitely be well or the old fashioned way plank logs and ground
      1. 0
        20 December 2017 21: 03
        The sound of the engine is also recorded on the tape recorder. And they move around. A tank model is placed on the car, several more are attached - that’s the column on the march, the fans mentioned in the article raise the dust.
    3. 0
      21 December 2017 00: 17
      Quote: TUFAN
      modern detection tools, which, for example, uses NATO, easily distinguish the materials from which such machines will be made from metal.

      Yeah. So I’ll make a tank model out of tin, and of course "modern means will make out that this is tin, not armor." And the depth of the skin layer is "no, we don’t know." wink
  10. +1
    20 December 2017 17: 07
    If all the equipment of the armies of the world were inflatable, they would not have to fight, or rather not what would be.
  11. 0
    20 December 2017 21: 11
    inflatable tank 100kg !!! and if it is inflated with helium, airbrushing and light tuning and run towards the nervous Swedes or the Baltic states!
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    20 December 2017 21: 27
    And anyway, you give an inflatable aircraft carrier! or a submarine.
    1. +2
      21 December 2017 01: 06


      Not inflatable, but cool.
  14. +1
    20 December 2017 22: 08
    Quote: Conductor
    And anyway, you give an inflatable aircraft carrier! or a submarine.

    Yeah. And the inflatable "Iskander" or "Yars" in the sky, heaving on the first space. In order of humor for a Catholic Christmas.
  15. 0
    21 December 2017 08: 52
    And what would I buy one such tangech, put in the apartment - puffed up and pleasing to the eye, though I still have to buy a big apartment)))
    1. 0
      23 December 2017 03: 47
      Quote: gukoyan
      I’ll also have to buy a big apartment)))

      And you inflate the apartment ... wink
  16. +1
    21 December 2017 10: 54
    It all started with inflatable women. Or from the Semibaba Farm

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"