Ukrainian resolution on Crimea with a rattle passed in the UN

December 20 2017

The UN General Assembly adopted the Ukrainian version of the resolution on Crimea. In one of the points of the resolution: "The temporary occupation by Russia of a part of Ukraine." The text says that the Russian authorities "illegally established their laws on the peninsula." At the same time, Russia is referred to as the “occupying power”.

The resolution calls on Russia to lift the ban on the operation in the Crimea by the extremist organization Mejlis. Recall that earlier the decision to ban the activities of this structure on the Russian peninsula adopted the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

The preparation of the draft resolution by Ukraine was carried out jointly with 30-th countries, for which the very concept of popular will in a referendum is an empty sound.

Ukrainian resolution on Crimea with a rattle passed in the UN

For the first time, the draft resolution on Crimea was supported only by 70 states. This is an anti-record for this kind of "documents". 76 UN member states decided to abstain during the voting. 26 states voted against the draft resolution. In addition to Russia, it is the Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, South Africa, China, India, Bolivia, Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba, Serbia, etc.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Klimkin called the resolution on Crimea "the strongest pressure on Russia."

Photos used:: http://www.un.org

We are

76 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

Chertt 20 December 2017 05: 58 New
15

15

0
Foreign Minister of Ukraine Klimkin called the resolution on the Crimea "the most powerful pressure on Russia."
If this is the strongest pressure, then Russia is fine
1. Shura Perm 20 December 2017 06: 16 New
  
  +5
  
  5
  
  0
  
  From the UN there is no sense, they dragged Kosovo in due time ...
  1. The black 20 December 2017 06: 24 New
    
    +9
    
    9
    
    0
    
    They simply drove on duty to the moon and dispersed. Everybody violet .... and so. For the fourth year imbitsyly waddle the thresholds of all international organizations where they are told "Yes, your Crimea, yours, unfasten already
    1. Lelek 20 December 2017 08: 26 New
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Quote: Black
      as well as the fourth year imbitsyly waddle the thresholds of all international organizations where they say "Yes, your Crimea, yours, unfasten already"
      
      , Vyacheslav (by the way, what should you call Vyacheslav or Vecheslav?)
      Yes, they went .... Let them take their directions. Germany and other EU members who are not fixated on Russophobia have already announced that they will send their observers to Crimea during the presidential election in Russia.
      
      And to the hetman, the Ruins were given a “black mark”.
2. Nehist 20 December 2017 06: 40 New
  
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  
  Generally surprised !!! Any resolutions! The VETO right would be imposed, and in general no one would discuss it, much less accept it! Something our representative stupid ...
  1. Titsen 20 December 2017 06: 56 New
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    Quote: Nehist
    Something our representative stupid ...
    
    After Churkin, nobody is there!
    
    In general, all this is a STRONG loss of our country!
    1. LSA57 20 December 2017 07: 43 New
      
      +4
      
      4
      
      0
      
      Quote: Titsen
      In general, all this is a STRONG loss of our country!
      
      what is strong? Have you received a piece of paper? what's the use of her? the sea has already been laid on us like these papers and we all live. yes do not give a damn about it as mattresses spit
  2. Strips 20 December 2017 07: 17 New
    
    13
    
    13
    
    0
    
    Quote: Nehist
    The VETO right would be imposed and
    
    There is no Veto right when voting in the UN General Assembly. The veto right is when voting in the UN Security Council.
    True, such a vote does not really mean anything.
  3. Omskgasmyas 20 December 2017 08: 26 New
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    This resolution is not binding. So do not waste in vain such a powerful weapon as a veto.
  4. Orionvit 20 December 2017 14: 32 New
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: Nehist
    The VETO right would be imposed, and in general no one would discuss it, much less accept it! Something our representative stupid
    
    The veto right exists only during discussions in the UN Security Council, and not at the General Assembly. Check out the structure of this organization.
3. LSA57 20 December 2017 07: 40 New
  
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  
  Quote: Chertt
  If this is the strongest pressure
  
  so what did he push? a piece of paper? Well, this piece of paper must be used in the toilet
  1. Chertt 20 December 2017 08: 33 New
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: LSA57
    so what did he push? a piece of paper? Well, this piece of paper must be used in the toilet
    
    You don’t be nervous, we’ll do it, shoot . You protect your emotions, we will be prepared with so many nasty things by our “Western partners”. And Russia FSU.
    1. LSA57 20 December 2017 12: 21 New
      
      +2
      
      2
      
      0
      
      Quote: Chertt
      "Western partners" will prepare so much more nasty things for us.
      
      but our armored train ...
210ox 20 December 2017 05: 59 New
+6

6

0
Most of the inhabitants of the Earth are against, the rest abstained .. Only a bunch of mongrels yapping from the gateway .. And the caravan goes ..
Said 20 December 2017 06: 00 New
23

23

0
What a news! My Uzbekistan voted against, I am proud.
1. 210ox 20 December 2017 06: 02 New
  
  +9
  
  9
  
  0
  
  Now there is a rapprochement of positions in the international arena of Uzbekistan and Russia .. It's high time.
  Quote: Said
  What a news! My Uzbekistan voted against, I am proud.
2. Uncle lee 20 December 2017 06: 03 New
  
  15
  
  15
  
  0
  
  “How did you end up here, Said?”
  -Shoot!
  1. Separ DNR 20 December 2017 06: 14 New
    
    +4
    
    4
    
    0
    
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    “How did you end up here, Said?”
    -Shoot!
    
    Aha
    And meet Javdet, do not touch He him
  2. UZBEK TASHKENT 20 December 2017 10: 38 New
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    Shot ...
3. amirbek 20 December 2017 13: 24 New
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  Quote: Said
  What a news! My Uzbekistan voted against, I am proud.
  
  76 countries are weaklings ... the scheme of the occupation of Crimea has shown itself well ... it is necessary to further occupy the LPR DPR ... and so on. ... and close the shop in the UN for no good
  1. Antares 20 December 2017 16: 17 New
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: Amirbek
    the scheme of the occupation of Crimea showed itself well
    
    yes excellent, 2 in positive territory, 40 in negative territory, minus 600 km of buffer, and the largest land border has ceased to be neutral. Loss of 1/3 of Russians for future projects. More precisely, the solemn transfer to their enemy, oh partners ..
    We don’t take trifles like cultural, church and language, the Russian world is narrowing and the Russian language began to die even faster ...
ImPerts 20 December 2017 06: 01 New
+2

2

0
No, but what?
The whole world is with them!
Galloped
Same lech 20 December 2017 06: 03 New
10

10

0
did not support the updated resolution on the human rights situation in the occupied Crimea Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Burundi, Cambodia, China, Cuba, North Korea, Eritrea, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Philippines, Russia, Serbia, South Africa , Syria, Sudan, Tajikistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

Most of humanity on our planet (note not the Anglo-Saxon planet) did not support the hallucinations of the Kiev regime and its masters.

It is gratifying ...

The countries that voted for ... the traditional opponents of Russophobia RUSSIA ... they always mischief our country.
1. novel66 20 December 2017 07: 31 New
  
  +6
  
  6
  
  0
  
  it is gratifying that Belarus has finally decided!
  1. Omskgasmyas 20 December 2017 08: 28 New
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Yes. And the Philippines are on our side. A perennial colony of squeezed out from the Spaniards.
  2. Ronald Reagan 20 December 2017 11: 03 New
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    Belarus will not voluntarily refuse a source of income.
    1. novel66 20 December 2017 12: 53 New
      
      +2
      
      2
      
      0
      
      however, they refused to recognize Crimea as Russian
      1. Ronald Reagan 20 December 2017 19: 24 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        His recognition does not promise benefits, but only adds problems - economic and political. Moreover, the Old Man has long spoken out about the Crimea and his opinion is not on the side of Russia or Ukraine.
Mountain shooter 20 December 2017 06: 10 New
11

11

0
But don’t we ... in parallel? What, Russia will now kneel down, open a "bunker" and begin to pay, pay ...?
In Crimea, it’s good. And the bridge is almost ready. And the power plants will soon finish, which will be fed with gas produced in Crimea ...
And the Tatars - and what about the Tatars? The seizures and the "Shanghai" - ended ... Ukrainian razgulyaevo - when no taxes, no SES - too.
1. osoboye_mneniye 20 December 2017 09: 07 New
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  Quote: Mountain Shooter
  And the Tatars - and what about the Tatars? The seizures and the "Shanghai" - ended ... Ukrainian razgulyaevo - when no taxes, no SES - too.
  
  Instead of legal lobi. That is, everything is the same, but on seemingly legal grounds.
  In general, you hurried about how everything is fine in the Crimea. So far, in Crimea, they are only recovering what he lost when he left Ukraine.
rotmistr60 20 December 2017 06: 18 New
+4

4

0
Ukrainian resolution on Crimea with a rattle passed in the UN
With a rattle, but still passed. So not everyone understands what they are voting for, but simply carry out the received installation. Sheer squalor and lack of own opinion.
Klimkin called the resolution on the Crimea "the most powerful pressure on Russia"
Well, this is a miracle from the Ukrainian "diplomacy" is not even worth commenting.
Herculesic 20 December 2017 06: 37 New
+3

3

0
And we chew snot-why not our Foreign Ministry to overwhelm the UN with its similar papers on ukroin? In the same Odessa, for example, to protest that in the illegally obtained Ukrainian and Russian cities of Odessa on May 2, there was a massive destruction of the Russian-burning population. Threaten the entry of our troops into Odessa! !!
1. dog breeder 20 December 2017 06: 53 New
  
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  
  For Sevastopol already answered. The time will come, and they will answer for Odessa!
2. zoolu350 20 December 2017 07: 48 New
  
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  
  Opportunities to finish ukroreich and any other pseudo state in the vastness of the USSR at the oligarchy of the Russian Federation a wagon and a small cart. It is only necessary to declare activity labeled with treason, to judge him and all his living team and to denounce the Bialowieza conspiracy, but the oligarchy of the Russian Federation will not do this because the Bialowieza conspiracy is the basis of his power.
  1. Golovan Jack 20 December 2017 07: 54 New
    
    10
    
    10
    
    0
    
    Quote: zoolu350
    It is only necessary ...
    
    You, my dear, will you be one of the politicians?
    Everything is smooth and simple with you, and all your opponents are idiots who do not understand obvious (only to you, note) things
    1. osoboye_mneniye 20 December 2017 09: 05 New
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Quote: Golovan Jack
      Everything is smooth and simple with you, and all your opponents are idiots who do not understand obvious (only to you, note) things
      
      Why didn’t he say that?
      Yes, there are opportunities. Yes, it must be announced. Yes, they will not. Yes, because they will lose power.
      Maybe he expressed the obvious, but most do not see it.
      About smoothly and just also did not notice.
      1. Golovan Jack 20 December 2017 09: 41 New
        
        +8
        
        8
        
        0
        
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        Why didn’t he say that?
        
        All wrong.
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        Yes, I need to announce
        
        In dreams. In fact, everything is not so simple at all.
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        Yes, they will not announce
        
        And rightly so. Let it rot itself, it’s not long left. But it does not bring much harm.
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        Yes, because they will lose power
        
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        About smoothly and just also did not notice
        
        Well, what can I say ... completely correspond to your nickname, continue
        
        osoboye_mneniye 20 December 2017 19: 02 New
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        In dreams. In fact, everything is not so simple at all.
        
        You are so mysteriously expressed ..)) Or rather? What do you have "not so simple"? And for whom exactly is "not so simple"? For those he brought to power, of course, is not easy. Let’s continue to tell everyone with a smart look how difficult it is to remember that the country was sold for glass beads. And now they are selling Donbass.
        If you do not see your past, you cannot take a step into the future.
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        Well, what to say ...
        
        Smart people, when they have nothing to say in essence, prefer to remain silent)
      2. your1970 20 December 2017 13: 21 New
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        Everything is smooth and simple with you, and all your opponents are idiots who do not understand obvious (only to you, note) things
        
        Why didn’t he say that?
        Yes, there are opportunities. Yes, it must be announced. Yes, they will not. Yes, because they will lose power.
        Maybe he expressed the obvious, but most do not see it.
        About smoothly and just also did not notice.
        - they announced the denunciation of the Bialowieza Accords and? Then what? What are these legal, political and economic consequences? What power will they lose, with what fright, what are the grounds for the loss of power?
        Or do you think, they hung the one marked on aspen and Ukraine / Georgia / Limitrofs / the remaining 11 immediately rush back to the USSR, they say, take it !!! fall at your feet, just take it to yourself? Yeah, you have to be more realistic ...
        Even the union with us (4 existing treaties !!) Lukashenko doesn’t particularly want us
        
        osoboye_mneniye 20 December 2017 19: 08 New
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: your1970
        - announced the denunciation of the Bialowieza Accords and? Then what?
        
        Further, the return of power to the people and property of the state. Another thing is that it's not time yet. The people are not ready to take power.
        Quote: your1970
        What kind of power will be lost, with what fright, what are the grounds for the loss of power?
        
        If they lose property, they will lose power. Is it really that hard?
        Quote: your1970
        Or do you think-hung labeled on aspen and Ukraine / Georgia / Limitrophs / the remaining 11 immediately rush back to the USSR, they say, take it !!!
        
        And here is the USSR and the republic? We are talking about the oligarchy of Russia.
        Quote: your1970
        Even the union with us (4 existing treaties !!) Lukashenko doesn’t particularly want us
        
        Because he doesn’t want, we have the power of the oligarchs. He had already seen them.
        
        Essex62 20 December 2017 22: 57 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        You have the correct opinion, comrade. Only blood will flood the whole country of hucksters. When it was they who gave the loot without resistance. Correctly comrades think-situevina is not yet ripe revolutionary. Maybe it is just around the corner, dill will trample and wrap up, "pension" riots will begin. Or maybe the bandyun will spin and balance for a long time.
        But the Cossack mishandled, tagged does not interfere with a nap. There will be some benefit.
        
        osoboye_mneniye 20 December 2017 23: 28 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Quote: Essex62
        Only blood will flood the whole country of hucksters. When it was they who gave the loot without resistance. Correctly comrades think-situevina is not yet ripe revolutionary.
        
        They won’t give without blood. Entente flowers seem. But so far, the people are not very much in need of power. Those self-government tools that the president gave are lazy to use.
        At the expense of situevina, I understand that it is unlikely that the Bolsheviks could have successfully marched in 17th without support from abroad. The enemies of Russia wanted to throw off the tsar and weaken Russia. They gave the Bolsheviks money. The king was thrown off. Bourgeois brought to power. Almost like in Ukraine now. But since the Bolsheviks are not fascists, then in the 17th they and the bourgeois government also sentenced, which the sponsors of the collapse of Russia did not expect. Looks like the idea was so strong that the people did not sell the revolution, and the sponsors were left with a nose.
        But such a chance in history is given, perhaps, one at all times. GKChP well understood this. That's why they fired after failure.
        Now the sponsors of the ugliness of regime change are already scientists. Now there will be no total exploitation and impoverishment of the population, since the bourgeois understand that if they are greyhounds, then it will be like in the 17th. Now, under the guise of a democratic and social state, they are building an ordinary, but carefully economically verified, stall for the people. In order to know less, I understood (I dreamed not about Marx and not about the stars, but about my 6 acres and about my vacation in Turkey), so that the hay was juicy of several varieties (visibility of variety, and so that it was accessible), that there was order and safety, so that there were everyone understands national pseudo values (God forbid ideology) - Orthodoxy, patriotism and the firm, but good and fair bar (fathers-capitalists). This is enough to keep people in obedience and milk it as long as you want. Another generation will grow up, witnesses of the great past XX century will retire, and you can forget about situevina for a very, very long time. We will live, as in Sha and satellites.
        I do not say at all that the intentions of the authorities and the intentions of the oligarchy coincide. But for now, unfortunately, power without an oligarchy is almost powerless. And the close ties of officials and capitalists do not add optimism.
        There is something to think about.
        
        your1970 21 December 2017 08: 07 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        Quote: your1970
        - announced the denunciation of the Bialowieza Accords and? Then what?
        Further, the return of power to the people and property of the state. Another thing is that it's not time yet. The people are not ready to take power.
        -What do you call property? Land, factories? Well - returned. And further? "Comrades" managers (current) -knowing HOW to steal - okay, to the wall. And in their place ... and who in their place? A shaft of specialists-smart, honest, capable, able to manage? Okay - found. And then a BABLO appears in front of them .... okay, they shot again - or maybe not because a BABLO will also appear in front of the punishing authorities ....
        In the USSR, there was also no particular corruption because: 1) it was impossible to glow especially, 2) there was NOTHING glowing, the top of wealth was MACHINE !!!!
        And now a little different priorities - just look, for example, what kind of crush for iPhones. These people will go to fight "for national happiness" ?? !!! Yeah, schaz .... maximum in the NKVD - take bribes from the "bourgeois undercut".
        
        26 years taught - HERE and NOW, and not then "in the bright future."And you think those who are now under 40 (and this is at least 25-30% of the population !!!) will live with faith in "But our grandchildren will live under socialism !!!" ???? !!! ..
        There will NEVER be socialism, never ...
        Maidans - easily, and even - God forbid !! they can be regular, but there will be no socialist revolution anymore. For it, a total impoverishment of the masses is necessary - and now our stratification is very strong ..
        
        Everything is clearly visible on the example of Ukraine - one might even say an exemplary example. A lot of blood, redistribution of property, even greater impoverishment of the people.
        And this condition will last for a very long time - I think at least 10-15 years ..
        
        Z.Y. Do you know a lot of people who are ready to fight and die for the people - with their own people?
        
        osoboye_mneniye 21 December 2017 10: 08 New
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: your1970
        And you think those who are now up to 40 (and this is at least 25-30% of the population !!!) - will live with faith in "But our grandchildren will live
        
        I am 40 and I live in faith. I’m doing everything in my power for this. I won’t answer for the rest.
        And there will be socialism, illi will be something else, this is not my business. My task is to do everything possible for a good outcome in the future, and so that my grandchildren then do not spit on my grave, as they spit on the grave of Yeltsin. I don’t think much about the great ..
        Quote: your1970
        Maidans - easily, and even - God forbid !!
        
        Educate children on the right values. Influence life in the state (fight corruption and arbitrariness with all available methods), set a personal example, unite people around you. Try to change what is bad. Do not steal yourself (c). Then society will begin to grow a little wise, and the Maidan will be avoided, perhaps.
        Quote: your1970
        And this condition will last for a very long time - I think at least 10-15 years ..
        
        This condition will last until those over 40 chew their snot. And when they come out of age, this condition will remain forever, as it remained in the capitalist countries. Read the Ephraim Hour of the bull.
        Quote: your1970
        Do you know a lot of people who are ready to fight and die for the people - with their own people?
        
        People who are dying in Syria and the Donbass than you are not an example?
        And what do you yourself suggest besides stating the facts? Everyone can express smart thoughts ..
        
        your1970 21 December 2017 21: 17 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        Do you know a lot of people who are ready to fight and die for the people - with their own people?
        People who are dying in Syria and the Donbass than you are not an example?
        -
        An example, but very specific ....
        
        Many are ready to go to a neighbor and slap him as a counter for the fact that he is against the people? You were 40 — the USSR died when you were 13. What do you remember from that time? Recollections of adults — how everything was good? So, alas, then not everything was good, something was really bad and sad.
        
        I'm 48 ...
        
        osoboye_mneniye 21 December 2017 22: 28 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Quote: your1970
        Many are ready to go to a neighbor and slap him as a counter for the fact that he is against the people?
        
        You set the wagon forward of the engine. If there is an idea for the development of society (for example, the Bolsheviks have collective ownership of the means of production), designed to give everyone a better life, and if there is a neighbor who actively opposes, dooming our children to suffering in the future, then they will certainly slap.
        And now for what to spank? For what such a valuable idea for everyone?
        Quote: your1970
        You were 40 — the USSR died when you were 13. What do you remember from that time? Recollections of adults — how everything was good? So, alas, then not everything was good, something was really bad and sad.
        
        Something you are tricking. I went to shops, stood in queues, went in for sports, went to camps throughout the Union, studied at school, watched movies and TV, went to theaters, participated in public life, etc. etc. If you didn’t have all this, then I am sorry for you.
        If the child is not a stupid person, then at the age of 13 he thinks and evaluates events very well. What was good and what was bad, I learned this contrary to the opinion of adults. Adults then all were with a roof that moved away from perestroika, jeans and accelerated democratization.
        So you are very wrong in believing that the generation of adolescents did not see life in the USSR. Very seen. And unlike adults, it was possible to perceive what was happening with a clear mind, not burdened with all sorts of cliches and adult pseudo-values. We saw the main thing - that the state takes care of us - treats, educates, provides with high-quality things and toys, natural food, etc., that the areas and streets are bright and spacious, that you can not breathe exhaust fumes, but ride a developed public transport network along empty streets, that it’s safe in the city, that dad and mom work in an interesting, skilled and well-paid job. And we looked calmly absolutely at any rubbish such as a queue to the store for an hour or crowding in a trolley bus. Then the queue is for 1-2 hours, and all the necessary products are available and cheap, and now, in order to purchase products of the same quality, you need to travel around three regions in traffic jams by traffic jams in 3 hours, and even lay out a round amount compared to vomiting ribbons - carousels, intersections.
        And most importantly. Our generation fell into just such a period of time that before the collapse of the USSR, they themselves studied actively. And after the collapse, our children studied. Therefore, it is very easy for us to compare the lives of children and the lives of their parents.
        Tell us, what should we have seen then, beyond the control of the minds of adolescents? You are 8 years older. Already a whole institute could have finished before the collapse of the USSR! What did you see from what we did not see?
        Yes, we did not understand that the Union was actively breaking up, tormenting people with turmoil, and at the same time telling us that these were system flaws. We could not understand this. But adults did not understand this either. So everyone was in an equal situation, I think.
        
        your1970 22 December 2017 11: 58 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Quote: osoboye_mneniye
        We saw the main thing - that the state takes care of us - treats, educates, provides with high-quality things and toys, natural food, etc., that the areas and streets are bright and spacious, that you can not breathe exhaust fumes, but ride a developed public transport network along empty streets, that it’s safe in the city, that dad and mom work in an interesting, skilled and well-paid job.
        - are you seriously talking about a 13-year-old teenager in the USSR ??? Yes, a 13-year-old thought then - we’ll play hide and seek, fight with the Bricksman’s, or better go to the movies, "Vaska built a plane in a circle, let’s go run!
        And you - “exhaust fumes, treat, education.” The dream of any student then, so that you could not go to school, that’s it.
        Even now, the people do not fully understand what they’ve lost. And you are talking about a kid under age. Throw it, it's not funny ...
        You started to understand it NOW, and then all this was taken for granted ....
        
        osoboye_mneniye 22 December 2017 23: 30 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Quote: your1970
        - are you seriously talking about a 13-year-old teenager in the USSR ??? Yes, a 13-year-old thought then - we’ll play hide and seek, fight with the Bricksman’s, or better go to the movies, "Vaska built a plane in a circle, let’s go run!
        
        Absolutely seriously. Voynushka and hide and seek is the level of kindergarten and elementary school. At the age of 13, a teenager conducts socially significant activities absolutely normal, has clear goals, is seriously engaged in their achievement and is responsible for his actions. And those who are 13 years playing hide and seek, and now abound. Do you offer to focus on them, as on most? Hmm ... perhaps you are not objective.
        Quote: your1970
        You started to understand it NOW, and then all this was taken for granted ....
        
        I can agree with that. But the basis for comparison with the eyes of a teenager was laid precisely then.
        
        And yet, I don’t understand what important thought you are trying to convey to me. Why argue? You can clearly, sequentially and complete express in one statement what you are currently unhappy with, what do you think needs to be done to prevent this from happening, and what do you do for this? I do not see any constructiveness in your speeches. Some incoherent arguments are not clear against what. An argument for the sake of argument.
        
        zoolu350 24 December 2017 09: 56 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Lots of neighbors are just ready to many, give only an excuse.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        zoolu350 24 December 2017 10: 02 New
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: your1970
        There will NEVER be socialism, never ...
        Maidans - easily, and even - God forbid !! they can be regular, but there will be no socialist revolution anymore. For it, a total impoverishment of the masses is necessary - and now our stratification is very strong ..
        
        Everything is clearly visible on the example of Ukraine - one might even say an exemplary example. A lot of blood, redistribution of property, even greater impoverishment of the people.
        And this condition will last for a very long time - I think at least 10-15 years ..
        
        Z.Y. Do you know a lot of people who are ready to fight and die for the people - with their own people?
        
        Never say never. Under feudalism, they also thought that serfdom was eternal. The USSR is a guest from the future. A spaceship built with a hammer, sledgehammer, nails and boards, and therefore it did not fly for long, but when it is revived with new technologies, the flight will last much longer.
        
        your1970 25 December 2017 10: 28 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        the spaceship died before the eyes of one generation - in 1991 there were many more people born before the start of its flight ....
        One pushed about 13s in the USSR - thinking about safe streets and the environment, the other about new technologies ..
        This is possible in one single case - when poverty becomes widespread as in RI - when more than 80% of the population did not have NOTHINGthey had nothing to lose at all. That is why THEN they also burned, gouged out the eyes of the tribal horses, cut down the gardens - out of hate to the rich, and not out of a desire to cash in / redo ....
        Now 1) almost everyone has something to lose, 2) there is no hatred - there is ENVY for the rich. Out of envy - they can steal, write a denunciation, make a dirty trick (drop an egg on a car / scratch it with a nail). But this is not enough for the revolution. That's when he ripens to the point that they gathered as a team, they discussed and went to kill the rich man / his guard / his wife / his children.
        Moreover, the presence of ALL local poor is strictly necessary, otherwise there will be a simple redistribution of the rich from one to the other, which happened in Ukraine. It seems that all the evils were on the regime - and quite a few terbats and other bandits went to kill. .
        
        And do not confuse with the current poverty, it is different
        
        zoolu350 25 December 2017 10: 40 New
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        But the owners of the Fed moved the matter in Ukraine in their favor. So the reverse process is possible. And hatred also arises after the critical mass of negativity in cases with Serdyukov, Zakharchenko (who is not from the DPR), Mara Baghdasaryan, IOC, WADA, etc., exceeds the threshold. The main thing is the Idea, Organization and Leader.
    2. zoolu350 22 December 2017 14: 30 New
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      It’s more honorable to be a politician than to be a highly paid labor force of the Russian oligarchy like you. If by opponents we mean individuals of the oligarchy of the Russian Federation and the "elites" of the CIS countries, then they perfectly understand this and are afraid to tremble in their knees. If the owners of the Fed, then they also understand and therefore support the power of the above. But this does not eliminate the need for actions aimed at destroying the power of all this shobla (your masters) and establishing the power of the Russian people.
3. Alexander Ra 20 December 2017 08: 00 New
  
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  
  Right. Why not initiate an investigation of US war crimes and the "West" in Libya, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan. It's time to recognize the United States as the main international terrorist. It is not superfluous to test the UN for effectiveness, the compliance of goals with the results, and to determine clear criteria for evaluating activities. At the same time, you have to ask yourself many questions.
  1. Golovan Jack 20 December 2017 09: 44 New
    
    +9
    
    9
    
    0
    
    Quote: Alexander Ra
    It is not superfluous to test the UN for effectiveness, for meeting goals with results.
    
    UN on the content of the United States and its ... say, allies:
    Countries making the main contribution to the UN regular budget in 2015
    
    Contributions (Percentage)
    United States 22.000
    Japan 10.833
    Germany 7.141
    France 5.593
    United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 5.179
    China 5.148
    Italy 4.448
    Canada 2.984
    Spain 2.973
    Brazil 2.934
    
    The data, however, two years ago ... but quite suitable
    
    And whoever dines with the girl, you yourself understand her, and she dances.
4. Antares 20 December 2017 16: 19 New
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  Quote: Herkulesich
  Threaten the entry of our troops into Odessa!
  
  threaten. But in Odessa they were waiting for only one army. Army of the Soviet Union (in WWII)
  the rest others will be hostile.
Overlock 20 December 2017 06: 56 New
+1

1

0
dogs bark, Crimea is Russia.
Strips 20 December 2017 07: 31 New
+2

2

0
For the first time, a draft resolution on the Crimea was supported by only 70 states. This is an anti-record for this kind of "documents." 76 UN member countries decided to abstain during the vote. 26 states of the world voted against the draft resolution.

The author is a little mistaken. Resolution (71/205), adopted a year ago, dealt with the human rights situation in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. On December 19, 2016, 70 countries voted for this document, another 77 abstained, and 26 delegations opposed it.

Of course, compared with the first resolution, there are clear changes for the better. But the first resolution was as if significant. Now for the second year, a similar resolution has been passing with the same result.

And it’s difficult to call it with a rattle when 26 is against 70. The fact that many abstained is still not quite a rattle.

Although of course there is little sense in these resolutions - they have no real power.
1. Antares 20 December 2017 16: 23 New
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  Quote: Tiras
  The author is a little mistaken
  
  the author is not mistaken. The main thing here is to inspire the audience that the world has come to terms with the status of Crimea and all is well. Despite the low importance of the resolution, it is still a platform for information warfare.
  I am afraid to stumble around Crimea, despite the agreement with Ukraine, will be for a long time.
  However, the main pressure is not from the Crimea, but from the Donbass.
Mar.Tirah 20 December 2017 07: 41 New
+1

1

0
Quote: novel xnumx
it is gratifying that Belarus has finally decided!

And Israel! Who doesn’t have a single dime of his land. Everything is taken by force. But go and you have taken care of the Crimea! Two-faced ..... and!
1. Strips 20 December 2017 07: 51 New
  
  +4
  
  4
  
  0
  
  Quote: Mar. Tira
  And Israel! Who doesn’t have a single dime of his land. Everything is taken by force. But go and you have taken care of the Crimea! Two-faced ..... and!
  
  There is a nickel. The rest is taken in defensive wars.
  
  After Russia's vote in UNESCO and, in general, all Russian votes against Israel and Jerusalem at the UN, did you expect Israel to vote in favor of Russia?
  
  Israel did not specifically participate in the very first resolution on Crimea, giving a positive signal to Russia. And then Russia voted for delusional resolutions in UNESCO and against Israel.
  
  So the behavior of Israel is understandable.
Retvizan 8 20 December 2017 07: 41 New
+1

1

0
In Ukraine, I’m overwhelmed! "The whole world supports us! 70 states voted for the resolution." In short, they collected all the dwarfs, including the great and mighty Lithuania, Latvia, Georgia and other husks ... But didn’t that 112 states support this resolution?
Moreover, such great countries professing a real independent and independent policy, such as China, India, Iran, etc. voted in general against!
1. Lelek 20 December 2017 08: 36 New
  
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  
  Quote: Retvizan 8
  In Ukraine, I’m overwhelmed!
  
  . How long? Judging by the situation, the “Barbumbio Kerguda” is just around the corner, which even the Hetman Ruins himself is talking drunk:
dsm100 20 December 2017 07: 44 New
+2

2

0
And our army !!!
BAI 20 December 2017 09: 03 New
0

0

0
For the first time, a draft resolution on the Crimea was supported by only 70 states. This is an anti-record

Who cares? Yes, even with an advantage of 1 (ONE) vote. The main thing is accepted. And will be used everywhere. To the detriment of Russia.
AKsvlad047 20 December 2017 09: 11 New
+1

1

0
Just send everyone !!! I don’t know what else to offer !!!
Nemesis 20 December 2017 11: 35 New
0

0

0
But isn’t it time to break off diplomatic relations with these Bandera gentlemen and expel all their citizens from Russia ?!
1. Strips 20 December 2017 13: 31 New
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  Or can Russia break off relations with Ukraine and set an example?
  And then commodity circulation is growing between Ukraine and Russia, there are diplomatic relations and it looks somehow strange given your suggestions regarding other countries.
  1. Nemesis 20 December 2017 15: 21 New
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    In general, all relations with Ukraine must be broken. Enough to feed the state with Russophobia and its citizens
flunker283 20 December 2017 12: 18 New
0

0

0
it is not condemned
A. Privalov 20 December 2017 12: 43 New
+1

1

0
The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution in accordance with which Russia is recognized as an "occupying power." The annexation of the Crimea was condemned by 70 states, including the US and the EU.

By the way, note that Israel did not support this resolution, unlike Russia, which does not miss a chance to support any anti-Israel resolutions.

Well, now it’s quite an opportunity to try on Russia’s Israel costume. This suit is not comfortable, and in the armpits it presses and sits lousy, but there is nothing to do, they called it the occupier - be patient. Now everything with a new force on you zaorut, what is it, how is it ??? !!! !!! This is a violation of everything and everyone! The same is necessary, squeeze right on a bare spot, but in broad daylight, the nearest neighbor has a peninsula the size of Israel !!!
But what does that mean to you?
Yes, absolutely nothing. As if this is so important to you. Of course it's not nice. But not more. You already know that your Crimea.
In the meantime, you should remember that the capital of Israel is Jerusalem, (which is not Tel Aviv, it has never been). And not only the capital of the State of Israel, but the Eternal capital of Eternal Israel. And this is important for us.
1. A. Privalov 20 December 2017 15: 26 New
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  For those interested in the topic. This is not the first resolution of the UN General Assembly on Crimea. On March 27 of the 2014, the resolution A / RES / 80 / 68 was adopted at the 68 plenary meeting of the 262 session of the UN General Assembly. It confirms the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine in its internationally recognized borders and does not recognize the legality of any change in the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the status of the city of Sevastopol, based on the results of the all-Crimean referendum held on March 16 of 2014, since this referendum, according to this resolution , has no legal effect.
  Of the 193 UN member countries, 100 was in favor, 11 was against, 58 of the countries abstained, and 24 countries did not vote (including Israel).
  This resolution was preceded by 6 meetings of the UN Security Council (UN Security Council) on the situation in Crimea. 15 March 2014, a draft resolution was put to the vote on the situation in Crimea. The draft supposed that the Security Council "confirms adherence to the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders" and "declares that the referendum cannot have legal force and cannot serve as a basis for any change of the status of Crimea", as well as Calls upon all States, international organizations and specialized agencies to refrain from any actions or contacts that directly or indirectly recognize such. 13 members of the Security Council voted for the adoption of the resolution (Australia, Argentina, Great Britain, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Nigeria, Republic of Korea, Rwanda, USA, France, Chad, Chile). China abstained, and Russia - the culprit of this whole celebration - has vetoed. After that, it was decided to postpone voting on the Crimean issue to the General Assembly. The corresponding draft resolution was prepared by 24 March. The authors of the document were the delegations of Germany, Canada, Costa Rica, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine. 41 also supported the project as sponsors.
  Unlike decisions taken in the Security Council, resolutions of the UN General Assembly are not legally binding for states and are advisory in nature. At the same time, the appeal announced in the resolution not to recognize the change in the status of Crimea was mainly supported at the international level and few countries recognized Crimea as belonging to the Russian Federation.
2. zoolu350 25 December 2017 10: 50 New
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  Eternal Israel, which was built by the UN 70 years ago on the site of a former British colony? I don’t have any desire to remember this nonsense, but to correct the stupidity of desire 70 years ago, more and more.
Balagan 20 December 2017 19: 08 New
0

0

0
The document spelled Sevastopol and Crimea Ukrainian. That's when the UN indicates that this is Russia - there will be a subject for discussion. And so - all claims to the Ruin.
Slam 23 December 2017 14: 02 New
0

0

0
The Ukrainian resolution on the Crimea, with a gnashing of teeth of the Russian delegation, was held at the UN.
1. Alexander Ra 25 December 2017 17: 23 New
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  There are 10 thousand victims of civil war in recognized Ukraine, and this sacrifice of independence continues. The wild cult of anthropophages is supported by a "civilized" Europe - the signatories of the resolution. How dangerous is our "elite", which prays for this Europe. In the “unrecognized” Crimea, many thousands of saved lives. The time will come - they will catch the cannibals.