The first stage of flight tests of the aircraft engine for the Il-112В aircraft is completed

70
New aviation the TV7-117ST engine developed by Klimov JSC (part of UEC), designed for installation on the Il-112V light military transport aircraft, completed the first stage of flight tests.

During this phase of the test, the order of 20 flights was carried out, on the results of which CIAM should issue its conclusion on the possibility of installing the TV7-117CT on the first IL-112В prototype aircraft.
- stated in the aviation industry.



The first stage of flight tests of the aircraft engine for the Il-112В aircraft is completed


They clarified that the tests were conducted on the IL-76LL flying laboratory. The conclusions of CIAM on the first stage of testing are expected in mid-January of the year 2018.

The work on bringing TV7-117CT to the requirements of the technical specification will continue until 2020 of the year, that is, until the completion of the development work and state tests of the aircraft with these engines
- Said the source agency.

According to him, when creating the TV7-117CT, the most advanced materials, technologies and engine management systems are used. Maximum take-off power increased to 3 ths. Hp instead of 2,5 ths. Hp in TB7-117CM, and in emergency mode, the engine develops power 3,6 thousand hp In addition, the power plant of the IL-112В aircraft is equipped with new propellers AB-112 developed by the research and production enterprise Aerosila.

The Klimov company develops an engine within the framework of a previously concluded agreement between the UEC and the Ilyushin Aviation Complex for the development of design and development works on the subject: "Development of a turboprop engine with a free turbine TV7-117CT and SAU for the Il-112В aircraft" with the code "LVTS-TV7-117ST-Klimov"
- Leads "Interfax" the words of the interlocutor of the agency.
  • AO "Klimov"
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    19 December 2017 12: 54
    It is right. It is better to produce domestic IL-112 than the Czechoslovak L-410 to purchase. It is time to return the IL-114 to production.
    1. +2
      19 December 2017 13: 04
      And there is no such country, and the company has long been owned by a Russian company.
      1. +2
        19 December 2017 15: 40
        It doesn’t matter who owns the company if Russian workers do not work for it and it does not pay taxes in the Russian Federation ...
        1. +2
          19 December 2017 15: 59
          Quote: Nemesis
          It doesn’t matter who owns the company if Russian workers do not work for it and it does not pay taxes in the Russian Federation ...

          An assembly shop has already been built at UZGA and assembly of 6 L-410 per year is being carried out. Most of the components have been imported so far ...
          Here is the link:
          http://www.zhukvesti.ru/articles/detail/40867/
          1. +3
            19 December 2017 16: 05
            I see no reason to import anything and pay for the licensed production of a foreign aircraft, if you have your own cars, it’s no worse ... Doesn’t like the IL-114, let them launch the Be-30.
            1. 0
              19 December 2017 18: 00
              Quote: Nemesis
              I see no reason to bring in anything and pay for the licensed production of a foreign aircraft, if you have your own cars, it's no worse ...

              Which (which) plane do you mean "no worse"?
              Quote: Nemesis
              Do not like the IL-114, let them arrange the release of the Be-30.

              Where and when will the IL-114? Be-30 - is it really real?
              L-410 most optimally fits into local flights, a very successful car. IL-114 - will already be a regional plane.
              The competitor for the L-410 may be the demonstrator TVS-2DTS, but it is single-engine, i.e. cannot fly over territories without the possibility of emergency landing (mountains, taiga, swamps).
              1. +2
                19 December 2017 18: 04
                The L-410 initially lost the Be-30 in flight performance and was adopted by the transport aviation of the USSR and Aeroflot solely for political reasons, which today have completely lost their relevance ... Any domestic aircraft, such as the Be-30, IL-112, IL -114 will be more useful to the Russian Federation than the Czech L-410 for whose licensed production you have to pay the Czech Republic, and its production is still outside the Russian Federation and taxes go to the NATO country, which is generally a crime against Russia ...
                1. 0
                  19 December 2017 18: 16
                  Quote: Nemesis
                  The L-410 initially lost the Be-30 in flight performance ....

                  Is this your personal opinion or is it reflected somewhere (link?) ???
                  Quote: Nemesis
                  Any domestic aircraft, such as the Be-30, Il-112, Il-114 will be more useful to the Russian Federation than the Czech L-410 for the licensed production of which you need to pay the Czech Republic,

                  Be-30 - forget it will never be revived.
                  IL-112, 114 is a completely different class of aircraft (why was there a drag?) And they are quietly brought to production and the engine is already at the exit.
                  Quote: Nemesis
                  L-410 for licensed production of which you must pay the Czech Republic
                  maybe I'm mistaken, but licenses and 51% of the company have already been purchased and will live their independent lives from the Czech Republic.
                  Quote: Nemesis
                  and its production is still outside the Russian Federation and taxes go to the NATO country, which is generally a crime against Russia ...

                  You can’t hear anything when most of the enterprises in Russia are offshore and pay taxes there, while in Russia there remains a small part of the tax on ruble wages.
                  1. 0
                    19 December 2017 18: 20
                    You need to forget about the procurement of aircraft in NATO countries, this is anti-Russian activity for which it is time to punish until the death penalty ... But I do not vote for the party of GDP and do not support it, then everyone will confirm this to you, so your complaints are not addressed .. . They will never live an independent life from the Czech Republic, because 51%, this is not 100%, and their owner is very doubtful ... And on the flight characteristics, everything is in the directories and even on Wikipedia ...
                    1. 0
                      19 December 2017 18: 29
                      Quote: Nemesis
                      You need to forget about the procurement of aircraft in NATO countries, this is anti-Russian activity for which it is time to punish until the death penalty ...

                      Anti-Siyas activity is your childish maximalism, close to blinded radicalism. Let's, according to our principles, give up everything that you do not do with your own hands. For yourself, you only make money (although if you are a milkmaid ...). Therefore, eat paper money, live in a bunch of them, have fun with them .... This is your mental goal.
                      1. 0
                        20 December 2017 11: 07
                        Normally, this is when the manufacturing industry is operating in the country, this indicates the development of the country ... And the fact that people like you sell logs abroad instead of furniture say that your desire to rule Russia is far ahead of your abilities ...
                    2. 0
                      20 December 2017 11: 38
                      Quote: Nemesis
                      And the fact that people like you today sell a log abroad, instead of furniture, indicate that your desire to rule Russia is far ahead of your abilities ...

                      About how you dodged ... I am such that I rule .... There is no "dad" - you judge by your standards and do not perceive objective reality. It is from it that one needs to build on, with the rational use of funds. It’s easier to take a loan - buy someone’s development with well-established production - or buy a disproportionate amount of money for a new development, with a lot of time lost (and you need planes now), with a bunch of mistakes and the risk of getting an unsuccessful result. L-410 is a very successful aircraft. And by the way, he and his production are wholly owned by Russia (did not check for offshore).
                      Somewhere you wrote that you did not support Putin ... Well, this is a consequence of your complete ignorance and misunderstanding of the situation in the country. Putin is being blamed for work to restore the power of Russia. Russian aviation was collapsed under Medvedev, and under Putin it began to recover.
                      But the main problem of Russia is in the Constitution of the country, where external management is legalized and the economy is indirectly hindered from investing in the national currency, which is why the desire of business in offshore companies is. It is necessary to change public opinion to actively support the lawful change of the Constitution through a referendum, but so far people have not "matured", and no referendum should be started.
                      1. 0
                        20 December 2017 11: 41
                        Mistrals such as you have already bought and are not able to understand. That with foreign-made aircraft they will wash you in the same way, it is only a matter of time ... I repeat - The desire of people like you to lead is ahead of your abilities!
              2. +1
                19 December 2017 22: 25
                IL-114 is not a regional plane, but just for the local airlines. I know this very well, because The IL-114 was to replace the Yak-40 in our squadron in Elista, one of the first in the Union. Almost everything was prepared for them, including rembase.
                1. 0
                  19 December 2017 23: 09
                  Quote: dmmyak40
                  IL-114 is not a regional plane, but just for the local airlines.

                  I will not argue, it’s just that the Il-114 has a range and carrying capacity 2 times that of the Yak-40, and larger planes are already operating as short-range ones.
                  1. +1
                    20 December 2017 09: 12
                    Well, here you need to look at the performance of ILs abstracted from the Yak, otherwise, compared with the An-2 IL-114 can be considered an airplane for long-haul airlines.
                    1. 0
                      20 December 2017 11: 09
                      The AN-2 length is just comparable, but the number of seats and the level of comfort are two big differences.
                      The main thing is that you can hardly ensure the IL-114 cabin is full on local flights, and take off and land at each town to pick up / drop off a few people - this is too expensive for a large aircraft. I am silent about the required runway area.
                      1. 0
                        20 December 2017 11: 17
                        An-2s haven’t been released for a long time ... An-3s were produced instead of it in the Russian Federation, with the Omsk engine, it takes 12 passengers in soft chairs ... And the Il-114 was designed to replace the An-24 and this is also small aircraft ... although already of greater capacity ... In any case, betting on a foreign L-410 with American engines, to which they can stop selling spare parts at any time, for political reasons, is not just stupid, but criminal.
                      2. +1
                        20 December 2017 20: 09
                        Why can't occupancy be ensured? The route can be made, as was the case in Soviet times, in large cities.
                        For example, the flight Elista-Mineralnye Vody (Grozny) -Tbilisi. Or Elista-Volgograd-Kuibyshev-Gorky (Kazan). Elista-Rostov (Krasnodar) -Simferopol-Rostov.
                        There were a lot of flights, it was easy to get to all major cities. For a jet Yak-40, it’s not very economical, but for a turboprop IL-114 it will be the following: a set of echelon 5000 (usually 5100, above 7000 or 8100 flight at almost full range or letter, for example, from Ordzhonikidze to Moscow) 15-20 minutes mute, then decline. A bunch of options can be found and people will fly.
                    2. 0
                      20 December 2017 20: 26
                      Quote: dmmyak40
                      Why can't occupancy be ensured? The route can be made, as was the case in Soviet times, in large cities. For example, the flight Elista-Mineralnye Vody (Grozny) -Tbilisi. Or Elista-Volgograd-Kuibyshev-Gorky (Kazan). Elista-Rostov (Krasnodar) -Simferopol-Rostov.

                      So you already decide, you have IL-114 local or regional, and then Grozny-Tbilisi ....
                      1. +1
                        20 December 2017 21: 21
                        It has long been determined, and not by me, by the way, that the IL-114 is an aircraft for local airlines. And what confuses you on the flight Grozny-Tbilisi? Distance, if not mistaken, less than 200 km along the highway.
                    3. 0
                      20 December 2017 23: 33
                      Quote: dmmyak40
                      It has long been determined, and not by me, by the way, that the IL-114 is an aircraft for local airlines. And what confuses you on the flight Grozny-Tbilisi? Distance, if not mistaken, less than 200 km along the highway.

                      It’s not a matter of distance, but of status ... You have listed large cities (regional centers).
                      Local airlines - this is the connection of regional centers (usually there is no aerodrome icon on the general map), with higher-ranking centers. There are small strips or platforms 500-1000m, where at most the L-410 can land. Of course, there are larger local runways, but it depends on circumstances or business activity ...
                      1. 0
                        21 December 2017 20: 50
                        Genry, that's the point! Airplanes can fly to a large airport, but this does not make them long-haul liners. It's all about airplanes, not airports.
                        I do not particularly understand the current classification, but during the Union the planes were divided into the following types (I do not take piston): 1) for local airlines (flight range 700-2500 km): Yak-40, L-410, An-24, An-28 , An-74, IL-114. 2) for short-haul airlines (range of about 3000 km): Tu-134. Yak-42, Tu-334 (conditionally). 3) for medium-haul airlines: Tu-154, Il-18, Il-86, Tu-214 (range of about 5000 km). 4) for long-haul airlines: IL-62, IL-96M (-300), Tu-204-300.
                2. 0
                  21 December 2017 21: 53
                  Quote: dmmyak40
                  Airplanes can fly to a large airport, but this does not make them long-haul liners. It's all about airplanes, not airports.

                  Both in airplanes and in airports. Can a large plane fly to a local airport with a strip of 600m? Here the distinction is determined. Not in range, but in airport class. And airports are built on economic feasibility and passenger flow. Somewhere the narrow narrow ground is 300 m, and where the wide concrete is 3500 m. Somewhere there is a whole range of aircraft maintenance services, and where there are no service personnel at all (one dispatcher for formality). This determines the ability to receive aircraft. It’s clear that a two-seat air taxi can fly to an international airport, but a long-haul plane can never land at a local airport.
                  A local airline is when you fly to a local airfield, albeit from an international airport. In this case, you need a local plane.
                  1. 0
                    21 December 2017 22: 33
                    Question: In Elista we had the runway 2200x90 (it was). What class will the boards boarding in it belong to? Local or regional? For example, from Volgograd, Dubai or Vladivostok?
                    1. 0
                      21 December 2017 23: 39
                      Quote: dmmyak40
                      Question: In Elista we had the runway 2200x90 (it was). What class will the boards boarding in it belong to? Local or regional?

                      You have a much higher class airport.
                      We look at the pedia: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AD%D0%BB%D0%B8%
                      D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0_(%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BF
                      %D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82)
                      Yeah! An international airport of federal significance ... Well, and a list in which short-haul aircraft are accepted.
                      1. 0
                        21 December 2017 23: 52
                        International airport of federal significance! laughing wassat wassat I beg of you! Three Ruslayn flights a week ... The runway is unfinished (crosses at the ends) of the air traffic control from Volgograd (although their dispatchers worked before approaching). The airport, alas, is dead ... I dropped in there last summer, silence ..., a couple of bored cops, on the platform of a pair of Yak-40, one of them is our former board. And that’s all.
                        By the way, if we had a Tu-154M landing (on YouTube there is a video of take-off, by the way), will it belong to which class of aircraft ??? bully
                    2. 0
                      22 December 2017 00: 09
                      Apparently, your airport once developed intensively. Now you do not have passenger traffic and the airport is becoming too expensive to maintain and it may be that the strip will not be repaired over the entire area (I assume that it will be shortened and narrowed). They will make you regional. Although it may be that he is considered a backup and will be fully supported, but from the general budget.
                      1. 0
                        22 December 2017 10: 24
                        Unfortunately, it developed intensively only during the times of the Union, in the 70s and 80s, when there were up to 30 flights a day, there were 3 flights to Moscow: 1st and 2nd without a night, 3rd with a night , with 1 and 2 through Lipetsk or Voronezh, and the 3rd directly to Bykovo (eternal memory). Minsk, Kiev, Kazan. Ashgabat, Shevchenko, Guryev, Gorky, Odessa, Tbilisi, Yerevan ... They flew a lot.
    2. FID
      +2
      19 December 2017 13: 09
      Quote: Nemesis
      It is better to produce domestic IL-112 than Czechoslovak L-410 to purchase

      A few different cars, don't you find? The same applies to the IL-114 ...
      1. +2
        19 December 2017 13: 16
        Quote: SSI
        Quote: Nemesis
        It is better to produce domestic IL-112 than Czechoslovak L-410 to purchase

        A few different cars, don't you find? The same applies to the IL-114 ...


        But this is true))) machines to put it mildly from different classes ...
      2. +2
        19 December 2017 15: 41
        I can’t find it. It’s a small aircraft, and where the L-410 can land, the IL-114 can land. Both aircraft have two turboprop engines ... That's just the taxes the company producing L-410 does not pay in the Russian Federation and it is not Russian citizens who work there, and if so, then such Russian aircraft are not needed. It is necessary to support domestic production and create jobs in the Russian Federation, and not abroad, so that taxes are paid to the budget of the Russian Federation and the citizens of the Russian Federation, and not the Czech Republic, work there
        1. +1
          19 December 2017 22: 14
          Wow) that is, a fly swatter for 14 people with a take-off weight of 6 tons, and a short-haul aircraft for 64 passengers and weighing over 23 tons, is this all for you small aircraft? Yes, and turboprop engines with a capacity of 1000 and 2800 hp, also, as it were, of different classes. On a strip length of 500 meters, Il as Elka, according to the documents will not sit down. And the proposal to organize in 2017, the production of the aircraft for the first time flying in 1968, and which did not go into production at that time, generally means that you are not very familiar with the subject of discussion. Just count - Be-30: empty weight 4600 kg; max take-off weight: 6100 kg; fuel weight 1080 kg; paid load of 1500-2000 kg. Now try to put it all together in different proportions, trying not to exceed the maximum allowed take-off weight, and you will understand that the numbers and opinions indicated in various encyclopedias should not be so easily taken for granted.
          1. 0
            20 December 2017 11: 13
            The IL-114 was designed as a replacement for the An-24 and yes, it’s a small aircraft ... and 12 people can be transported to the An-3 with Russian engines ... And the L-410 is a foreign car with American engines and spare parts for it at any time to stop selling the Russian Federation for political reasons
    3. +1
      20 December 2017 00: 37
      These are different classes and the L-410 has an American engine. And an analogue is not even being developed here ...
      1. 0
        20 December 2017 11: 10
        It’s all the more stupid to bet on a plane with an engine from the United States, spare parts for which they can stop supplying at any time, for political reasons.
        1. 0
          20 December 2017 11: 14
          There will be no problems for normal operation, but enough for army or export.
          1. 0
            20 December 2017 11: 20
            Everyone may have problems, not just the military ... For example, a civilian airline wants to work in Crimea (the United States considers it to be part of Ukraine), in the Kuril Islands (the United States supports Japan’s territorial claims) and here you have sanctions ... I don’t see the point in procurement the aircraft in operation of which there may be restrictions, especially since without the L-410 you can easily do
            1. 0
              20 December 2017 11: 25
              These are minimal problems and exploitation will not hurt. All our companies fly to Crimea and nothing ... Within the framework of a large country, this is being solved. In fact, these engines are so widespread that it is very difficult to fully block them. But the scale of our country can create difficulties. Therefore, we need a full line of TVD in all sizes - L-410 (An-2), IL-112/114 and more powerful
              1. 0
                20 December 2017 11: 28
                There is an An-3 for 12 passengers in soft chairs and with an Omsk engine ... So I don’t see the need for L-410 ... The same Mi-8 can carry 28 passengers ... I don’t see any need for L-410
                1. 0
                  20 December 2017 20: 19
                  there is the same engine problem! and the L-410 is still a fresher design and tested and already ours ...
                  1. 0
                    20 December 2017 20: 26
                    There are no problems with the engines for the An-3 and Mi-8 in the Russian Federation, but the engines for the Il-112 are already being tested, they can also be put on the Il-114 ... But the L-410 is not needed by the Russian foreign car
                    1. 0
                      20 December 2017 20: 30
                      Read what engines are offered for remotorization of AN-2/3 - only ours (but it has some problems)
                      1. 0
                        20 December 2017 20: 32
                        An-3 flew with the Omsk engine and now flies and there are no problems there. Several An-3 has the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Russian Federation, and several more Polar Airlines
  2. +4
    19 December 2017 12: 56
    At one time, work on IL-112 was abandoned in favor of An-140, jointly with the "fraternal" Ukraine.
    About ten or fifteen years have been lost ...
    1. 0
      19 December 2017 13: 17
      Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
      At one time, work on IL-112 was abandoned in favor of An-140, jointly with the "fraternal" Ukraine.
      About ten or fifteen years have been lost ...


      But now they are completed at a new qualitative level.
    2. +1
      19 December 2017 16: 09
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      About ten or fifteen years have been lost ...

      Lost much more. A generation of designers, workers ....
  3. +2
    19 December 2017 13: 00
    Well done our !!! A real breakthrough, Americans and Europeans bite their elbows. But we will not sell them to anyone - only in our industry!
    I respect Putin - I promised to finish the tests, I did it! Who here wants to change it to Navalny? How can he do that? That's it!
    1. FID
      +2
      19 December 2017 13: 11
      Quote: Mikhanishche
      promised to finish the test, did it!

      He personally promised you? Yes, and the tests after 2020 will end .... And where does Bulk? This is your friend, what do you do him advertising?
      1. +1
        19 December 2017 13: 17
        No, Putin promised the whole people! And performs!
        And what is your bulk? He promised nothing, did nothing.
        1. +1
          19 December 2017 14: 00
          Crap everywhere this bulk for mattress grandmother. Judas.
          1. 0
            20 December 2017 21: 51
            Do not drive Alexei, he is a good guy, something reminds me of Yeltsin in his youth.

            With him, there will be freedom and democracy in full;)

            These chic videos are released by associates of Navalny:


            Agree he is cutie%)
  4. 0
    19 December 2017 13: 08
    By the way, an excellent engine if I am not mistaken Izotov
  5. +2
    19 December 2017 13: 11
    We would also have to restore the production of engines for our "maize".
    And that would work even with sunflower oil with working out.
    1. 0
      19 December 2017 13: 19
      Quote: Zomanus
      We would also have to restore the production of engines for our "maize".
      And that would work even with sunflower oil with working out.


      This one can be safely put on a maize ... only the maize themselves will certainly not be produced.
      1. 0
        19 December 2017 13: 38
        Quote: Geisenberg
        This one can be safely put on a maize ... only the maize themselves will certainly not be produced.

        Not yet clear, but the prospects are very vague, despite the availability of a new version
        In general, according to Vladimir Barsuk, airlines do not show interest in the development of SibNIA, considering TVS-2DTS as a demonstrator of the technologies for using composites in the aircraft industry.
        http://aviation21.ru/vladimir-barsuk
        -zadacha-tvs-2dts-postoyanno-naxoditsya-v-vozduxe
        /
      2. 0
        19 December 2017 22: 19

        Geisenberg: "only the corn themselves will not be produced for sure."

        And why is it necessary to produce new ones, if you can just upgrade the old ones? There are still thousands of such planes flying !! There are ancient Cessns in the West and Americans don’t bother with their “backwardness”.
  6. +7
    19 December 2017 13: 14
    Work on bringing TV7-117ST to the requirements of the technical specifications will last until 2020

    1. +2
      19 December 2017 13: 30
      Hello namesake hi
      1. +3
        19 December 2017 13: 35
        San is healthy ... With the rise soldier
        1. +1
          19 December 2017 13: 41
          Thank you! I look at the engines for complete import substitution
  7. 0
    19 December 2017 13: 29
    We need to make a number of similar engines from small ones to drones to large ones for different types of aircraft. But shame, we buy for corn, we don’t have ours.
  8. 0
    19 December 2017 13: 35
    The work on bringing TV7-117CT to the requirements of the technical specification will continue until 2020 of the year, that is, until the completion of the development work and state tests of the aircraft with these engines
    Rogozin promised to lift the Il-112 this summer, then they moved it for six months, and now until 2020 ?! request the plane was already practically assembled ...
    1. 0
      19 December 2017 14: 02
      The rocket money must have gone.
  9. 0
    19 December 2017 14: 44
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    The work on bringing TV7-117CT to the requirements of the technical specification will continue until 2020 of the year, that is, until the completion of the development work and state tests of the aircraft with these engines
    Rogozin promised to lift the Il-112 this summer, then they moved it for six months, and now until 2020 ?! request the plane was already practically assembled ...

    Dmitry Olegovich says a lot of things. I have been following his activities for a long time. Unfortunately, most of his statements remain words! Although correct, but words! But from the words and statements, as you know, there is no sense!
  10. 0
    19 December 2017 17: 25
    Work on bringing TV7-117ST to the requirements of the technical specifications will last until 2020 ...

    Uh, no hurry, no hurry! ... And let's bring five more years !!! fool
    The plane was needed the day before yesterday, and you bring it all, damned thieves ... further along Lavrov ...! request angry
  11. 0
    20 December 2017 00: 38
    Interestingly, IL-76LL we have one? And PD-14 is also tested by TVZ ...
  12. 0
    20 December 2017 20: 37
    Nemesis,
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n90FmdCuvt8
    1. 0
      20 December 2017 22: 10
      This is not An-3, this is another tin can that Russia does not need with an engine of foreign production
      1. 0
        20 December 2017 22: 26
        There about different options, Ukrainian, Omsk and some other ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"